Patent Grant
10543483
The invention relates to a method of providing filtration of contaminants from process streams. In another aspect, this invention relates to a method for providing flow distribution of process streams in process units. In yet another aspect, this invention provides filtration or flow distribution or both while concurrently catalyzing at least one reaction to at least partially remove and/or convert certain chemical species within the process stream. In yet another aspect, this invention relates to a method and assembly for utilizing at least one cellular solid material in a component separation unit to separate one or more process streams into one or more component process streams having desired compositions.
Contaminants in process streams can be deleterious to processes and also to process units. Contaminants can damage process units, potentially resulting in an environmental or safety incident. Contaminants can also damage processes by decreasing efficiencies within processes, stopping production, affecting the specifications of products, or the like. Contaminants can be found in all types of process streams, such as feed streams, discharge streams, or effluent streams. Contaminants can affect various types of process units, such as reactors, extractors, distillation columns, scrubbers, tail gas treaters, incinerators, exchangers, boilers, condensers, and the like.
Process units may be configured such that process streams in the unit flows vertically downward or upward or both. Alternatively, process streams in the unit may flow radially from the center out or from the external part of the unit to the center or both.
Reactors are one type of process unit. Many reactors include discrete solid catalyst particles contained in one or more fixed beds. Catalyst beds are typically very efficient at trapping contaminants in process streams fed to the catalyst bed. Such catalyst beds, however, can quickly become clogged by these trapped contaminants. As the bed becomes clogged, pressure drop across the process unit rises resulting in eventual premature shutdown of the process unit.
Partly to mitigate this problem, catalyst bed process units as well as non-catalyst bed process units are often supplemented with conventional retention material beds that are somewhat less resistant to clogging. These conventional retention material beds are typically located at the inlet to the process unit. In the case of catalyst bed process units, the conventional retention material beds are typically inert to the reactions in the catalyst bed. These conventional retention material beds can be somewhat effective in trapping or filtering all or some contaminants such as dirt, iron oxide, iron sulfide, asphaltenes, coke fines, catalyst fines, salts, acidic impurities, sediments or other entrained foreign particulate material in the process stream entering, within or leaving the process unit. The trapping of the contaminants is to prevent undesirable material from clogging or poisoning or otherwise harming the process unit. When these conventional retention material beds are inert they are typically made of conventional ceramic materials in the form of pellets, rings, saddles or spheres and typically must be resistant to crushing, high temperatures and/or high pressures. While these conventional retention material beds can be somewhat effective in preventing the process unit from being clogged, the conventional retention material beds themselves eventually become clogged.
Conventional retention material beds may also facilitate flow distribution of the process stream in a direction perpendicular to the flow of the process stream across the process unit. Such behavior will be referred to herein as perpendicular flow distribution. As an example, in an upflow or down flow process unit, the process stream flow is in the axial direction and the perpendicular flow distribution is in the radial direction.
To increase the efficiency of conventional retention material beds, graduated layers of these materials in different sizes and shapes along with perforated discs, or screen baskets, have been used to retard the process unit from becoming clogged with contaminants such as dirt, iron oxide, iron sulfide, asphaltenes, coke fines, catalyst fines, sediments, or other entrained foreign particulate material.
Conventional retention material beds exposed to contaminants at the inlet to a process unit will eventually become clogged with contaminants. As this happens, the pressure drop across the process unit rises, resulting in the eventual shutdown of the unit. When this happens in catalyst bed process units, it is typical that part of the catalyst bed itself becomes somewhat or completely clogged with contaminants. After such shutdown of the process unit, skimming, or removal, of the clogged portion of the conventional retention material, as well as the clogged portion of the catalyst bed, is required.
In addition to clogging by contaminants in the process stream, polymerization of polymer precursors, e.g., diolefins, found in the process streams fed to catalyst bed process units may also foul, gum or plug such process units. In particular, two mechanisms of polymerization, free radical polymerization and condensation-type polymerization, may cause catalyst bed fouling, gumming or plugging. The addition of antioxidants to control free radical polymerization has been found useful where the process stream has encountered oxygen. Condensation polymerization of diolefins typically occurs after an organic-based feed is heated. Therefore, filtering prior to the process stream entering the catalyst bed process unit may not be helpful to remove these foulants as the polymerization reactions generally take place in the unit.
It is highly desirable to have retention materials that do not just clog with contaminants but efficiently and effectively filter contaminants from the process stream. Efficiency relates to the percent of contaminants removed by such materials from the process stream, as well as, to the range of sizes of contaminants that can be removed by such materials. Effectiveness relates to the extent that such materials do not impede the flow of the decontaminated process stream through the retention materials. Such materials would desirably remove virtually all contaminants within a broad range of sizes from the process stream, while not causing an unacceptable pressure drop increase across the process unit. It is also highly desirable to have retention materials that promote perpendicular flow distribution. The method of the present invention for filtration and flow distribution for process streams, when compared with previously proposed prior art methods, has the advantages of providing highly efficient and highly effective filtering of contaminants; increasing the life and activity of catalysts in catalyst bed process units; decreasing catalyst losses; enhancing product selectivities, increasing throughput/productivity, allowing for the optimization of process unit configuration; improving the perpendicular flow distribution of process streams into and within process units and eliminating the need to take process units off-line when conventional retention material beds have clogged to the point that pressure drop across units have risen to unacceptable levels. These benefits will result in both capital and operating cost savings, reduced downtimes, increased process unit performance and extended process unit operating time.
Weaknesses of conventional retention material beds are that they are neither particularly efficient nor particularly effective as filters. Conventional retention material beds are typically efficient at removing some contaminants from the process stream for a limited period of time. The contaminants so trapped are typically those about 50 microns and larger. The effectiveness of conventional retention material beds suffers due to eventual clogging, which prevents flow of the decontaminated process stream through the conventional retention material beds and leads to unacceptable increase in process unit pressure drop. Furthermore, conventional retention material beds appear to trap contaminants within about the top six to twelve inches of depth. Deeper beds of conventional retention materials do not increase the trapping capacity of these materials. Therefore, the art has sought filtration methods that remove particulate contaminants smaller than 50 microns, that filter particulate contaminants while allowing the free flow of decontaminated process streams with no significant rise in process unit pressure drop and that have a filtering capacity that increases with bed depth, regardless of bed depth.
Disadvantages associated with current perpendicular flow distribution designs and methods in process units may result in poor distribution within the process unit. Clogging or other fouling such as that caused by particulate contaminants or the products of undesired polymerization reactions may also cause maldistribution. The maldistribution may result in channeling and corresponding bypassing of portions of the process unit, reduction in the efficiency of contaminant removal and reduction in unit efficiency. Usually, a maldistribution problem is also evidenced by so-called temperature hot-spots. Such hot-spots can, for example, lead to increased coking and reduced activity in catalyst bed process units. Besides maldistribution problems and coking, the increase in pressure drop may cause catalyst breakdown as a result of attrition. Therefore, the art has sought a perpendicular flow distribution method that may distribute the process stream more uniformly within the process unit, provide efficient filtering of contaminants, reduce the occurrence of hot-spots, minimize catalyst attrition, and reduce fouling caused by undesired polymerization reactions.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,258,900 and 6,291,603, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties, describe reticulated ceramic materials that are used to filter and distribute organic feed streams in a chemical reactor. A need exists for filtering and flow distribution capabilities for other types of process streams besides organic-based streams and for other types of process units besides chemical reactors.
It is desirable for the filtering and flow distribution methods for all process streams and all process units to increase the filtering efficiency and effectiveness of materials utilized to remove contaminants from process streams, to improve perpendicular flow distribution within process units, to have unit run length determined by factors other than pressure drop increase, to minimize pressure drops across process equipment, and to maximize process safety and minimize environmental concerns arising from catalyst bed channeling and flow misdistribution, temperature hot-spots and process unit shutdowns and start-ups.
Component separation units are a specific type of process unit that have traditionally been used in laboratories, pilot plants and industrial facilities to separate process streams into component process streams having desired compositions. With regard to any component separation unit, a “process stream” can refer to a feed stream, “component process streams” can refer to product streams from the unit and “phases” can refer to individual liquid or vapor phases within the unit. During component separation, a phase moving in one direction and a phase moving in the opposite direction are contacted with one another within the component separation unit to effectuate mass transfer at the interface between the phases. Component separation is accomplished as a result of this mass transfer. As a result of the mass transfer, one or more process streams are separated to form one or more component process streams each having desired compositions. Typically, a plurality of trays and/or packing elements are positioned within the unit to facilitate contact between the phases and mass transfer between the phases. The trays are typically stacked horizontally with respect to one another, while the packing elements are randomly loaded or formed into a structured shape. Randomly loaded packing elements generally do not have any specified orientation relative to one another, while structured elements have a specific overall shape and relative orientation.
Examples of component separation units include, for example, distillation units, chromatographic units, absorbers, extractors and combinations thereof. Distillation units achieve component separation based on the differences in boiling points of the species present in the process streams fed to the unit. Distillation units include, for example, columns, fractionators, splitters, semi-continuous units, continuous units, flash units, batch distillation units, strippers, rectifiers, extractive distillation units, azeotropic distillation units, and vacuum distillation units. Absorbers and extractors are contacting units in which vapor and liquid phases are contacted and desired component separation is achieved based on the affinity of components in one phase to the components in the other phase. For example, a process stream containing components A and B may enter such a unit at one position while another process stream containing C may enter the unit at another position. One of these streams is typically liquid while the other can be liquid or vapor. Now assume component B has a much greater affinity for component C than for component A. Intimate contacting of the two streams in a properly designed and operated contacting unit will result in creating one product stream containing component A with a essentially no component B and a second product stream containing component C and essentially all of component B. Commercial use of such a unit might be driven by the difficulty of directly separating B from A versus of separating B from C. In this example the first product stream would be termed the desorbant and the second product stream would be termed the absorbant. Specific examples of absorber units include continuous absorbers, temperature swing absorbers, pressure swing absorbers, purge/concentration swing absorbers and parametric pumping. Extractors are contacting units in which immiscible liquid phases are contacted and component separation is achieved using a mass separating agent. In the example above, the component C in the second process stream would be the mass separating agent. An example of an extractor unit is an aromatics extraction unit wherein a hydrocarbon stream containing aromatic species and non-aromatic species are contacted with a mass separating agent such as sulfolane or morpholine and efficient contacting of these two immiscible liquids results in extraction of the aromatic species from the hydrocarbon steam into the stream containing the mass separating agent. Component separation units can also include a zone of catalytic materials to facilitate desired chemical reactions in the component separation unit. Examples of such include reactive distillation units and extractive distillation units. Examples of conventional unit internals used to achieve or enhance separation in component separation units include, for example, trays, randomly packed rings or saddles, structured packing having meshes, monoliths, gauzes and the like, collectors, distributors, downcomers, wall wipers, support grids and hold down plates.
Inside a component separation unit, there is repeated intimate contact between the rising phase and the falling phase. This contact is facilitated by the trays and/or packing materials. Each section of trays or depth of packing material may approximately represent a number of “theoretical stages” of separation. The component separation unit internals are designed and positioned within the component separation unit to produce the appropriate number of “theoretical stages” that will achieve the desired separation.
In distillation units the repeated contact between the phases ultimately results in a vapor phase consisting of higher volatility, lower boiling point species and a liquid phase consisting of lower volatility, higher boiling point species. This mass transfer between phases is driven by the differences between the boiling points of the species in the phases. Species with lower boiling points rise and components with higher boiling points fall. Upon creation of the one or more phases of desired composition, a portion of the vapor phase is typically recovered as an upper component process stream, and the remaining portion is condensed and passed as a reflux phase back into the distillation unit for further mass transfer. Likewise, a portion of the liquid phase is recovered as a lower component process stream, and the remaining portion is reboiled (i.e., vaporized) and returned to the distillation unit for further mass transfer. In addition, one or more component process streams can be recovered from the distillation unit at any location between the top and bottom of the distillation unit.
In component separation units, it is highly desirable to achieve efficient and cost effective separation within the unit. It is also highly desirable to achieve low pressure drop within the unit and a low HETP (height equivalent to a theoretical plate (or stage)) number for the unit. The degree of separation achieved by the unit may be affected by, among other factors, the amount of contact between the phases, the number of trays used, the amount and type of packing material used, the temperature and pressure at which the unit is operated, and the differences between the boiling points or other relevant separation characteristics of the species contained within the phases. Separation may also be affected by, for example, the design of the trays, the use of distributors in the unit to promote uniform distribution of phases across the cross-sectional area of the unit, and the design of the packing materials.
Prior art packing materials within component separation units have been either randomly loaded or structured. Randomly loaded or “loose” packing, although less costly than structured packing material, has been shown to have high pressure drop or low mass transfer characteristics, and suffer from poor phase distribution which results in poor separation efficiency in the unit. Also, prior art units that have utilized trays or “loose” packing materials have proven to be prone to corrosion and fouling and have provided inefficient separation. As a result, prior art loose packing technology gave way to the development of highly engineered structured packing technology. Structured packing materials can provide improved or separation efficiency; however, the manufacturing of structured packing material requires sophisticated machineries, engineering expertise and fabrication skills to design larger units to perfection. Further, these materials are generally more expensive to fabricate and require more unit down time for installation than random packing. Even though they are more costly, structured packing materials are often used in place of random packing because they provide higher production rates than existing units due to better pressure drop and mass transfer characteristics. The use of structured packing materials, however, has generally been limited to processes that are not subject to fouling or corrosion. Structured packing is more expensive and difficult to install, and so its use in processes where fouling or corrosion would necessitate more frequent replacement is economically unattractive.
Accordingly, prior to the development of the present invention, there has been no method and apparatus for separating process streams into component process streams having desired compositions in a component separation unit which provides the desirable characteristics and/or levels of: efficient separation at a low HETP value; relatively low pressure drop; resistance to fouling and/or corrosion; low fabrication and installation costs; ease of replacement; and improved overall performance and production. Therefore, the art has sought a method and apparatus for improving the separation of process streams into desired component process streams via distillation, absorption and/or extraction which: does not cause relatively large pressure drops; displays more efficient separation at a low HETP number; requires less complex and expensive design, fabrication, installation, operation and maintenance, resists fouling and corrosion, can be easily replaced and exhibits overall improved performance and production.
In accordance with the invention, the foregoing advantages have been achieved through the present method of filtering a process stream, for distributing a process stream within a process unit and for accomplishing one or both while concurrently catalyzing desired reactions. Yet another embodiment of the invention is separating one or more process streams into one or more component process streams having desired compositions in a component separation unit using specified forms of cellular solid materials. CELLDIST will be the name used to identify the specific forms of cellular solid materials used in the present invention. CELLDIST materials are three-dimensional cellular solids. Cellular solids are materials comprised of solid components or materials and cells. (“Cells” and “pores” are, for the purpose of this application, synonyms.) The solid material can be comprised of ceramics, metals, polymers and mixtures thereof. The cells can be open or closed or a combination of both. Open cells have windows into the cell said windows being of a size equal to or less than the size of the cell itself. Open-cell materials have passages between the cells through the windows in the cell. Closed-cell materials have no windows and no passages between cells. There are two basic structural forms of cellular solids: two-dimensional and three-dimensional. Two-dimensional cellular solids have cells that are translated in two dimensions. These typically form non-interconnected parallel channels. Honeycombs and monoliths are examples of two-dimensional cellular solids. There are two basic structural forms of three-dimensional cellular solids: periodic and stochastic. Three-dimensional periodic cellular solids are characterized by a unit cell that is translated throughout the structure with three-dimensional periodicity. Examples include ordered cell arrays such as hollow spheres and truss and lattice structures. Stochastic cellular solids have three-dimensional geometry with variation of cell sizes and shapes. These materials cannot be characterized by a single repeated unit cell. The randomness of the topology of these materials leads to the label “stochastic.” An example of an open-cell stochastic cellular solid is ceramic foam. CELLDIST materials need not be purely stochastic nor purely periodic in topology. CELLDIST materials may be intentionally or unintentionally a combination of the two, the latter due to the imprecision of nature when it comes to attaining perfect periodicity and the opportunity at some level to formulate stochastic materials that have some semblance of periodicity. Cellular solids with substantially open cells are also called reticulated materials.
CELLDIST materials must also satisfy the requirements of separation. The requirements of separation of the present invention are driven by the need to achieve satisfactory capacity, phase contacting and pressure drop in component separation units. The requirements of separation require that the CELLDIST materials exhibit sufficiently open cells and low relative density. Recognizing the possible existence of an amount of closed cells in the CELLDIST material, sufficiently open cells have windows into sufficient open cells such that the average window size is greater than 10% of the size of the average cells (including open and closed cells), preferably averaging greater than 40% of the size of the average cell. Relative density is the density of the cellular solid divided by the density of the solid material itself. Relative density is low if it is 50% or less, preferably 30% or less.
In accordance with the invention, component separation units are a specific type of process unit used to separate process streams into one or more component process streams having desired compositions. With regard to any component separation unit, a “process stream” can refer to a feed stream, “component process streams” can refer to product streams from the unit and “phases” can refer to individual liquid or vapor phases within the unit. Examples of component separation units relevant to the invention include, for example, distillation units, adsorbers, extractors and combinations thereof. During component separation in, for example, a distillation unit, a phase moving in one direction and a phase moving in the opposite direction are contacted with one another within the component separation unit to effectuate mass transfer at the interface between the phases. During component separation in, for example, an adsorption unit, mass transfer is accomplished by causing desired species from one or more fluid phases to be adsorbed on the surface of suitably activated solid materials, including CELLDIST materials, packed within the unit. During component separation in, for example, an extraction unit, fluid phases are contacted within the unit to achieve desired mass transfer between the phases. Component separation is accomplished as a result of this mass transfer. As a result of the mass transfer, one or more process streams are separated to form one or more component process streams each having desired compositions.
Examples of component separation units relevant to the invention include, for example, distillation units, absorbers, extractors and combinations thereof. Distillation units achieve component separation based on the differences in boiling points of the species present in the process streams fed to the unit. Distillation units include, for example, distillation columns, fractionators, splitters, semi-continuous units, continuous units, flash units, batch distillation units, strippers, rectifiers, extractive distillation units, azeotropic distillation units, and vacuum distillation units and combinations thereof. Absorbers and extractors are contacting units in which one or more fluid phases are contacted and desired component separation is achieved based on the affinity of components in one phase to either the components in the other phase or to suitably activated solid adsorbent materials packed in the unit. For example, a process stream containing components A and B may enter such a unit at one position while another process stream containing C may enter the unit at another position. One of these streams is typically liquid while the other can be liquid or vapor. Now assume component B has a much greater affinity for component C than for component A. Intimate contacting of the two streams in a properly designed and operated contacting unit will result in creating one product stream containing component A with a essentially no component B and a second product stream containing component C and essentially all of component B. Commercial use of such a unit might be driven by the difficulty of directly separating B from A versus of separating B from C. Specific examples of absorber units include continuous absorbers, temperature swing absorbers, pressure swing absorbers, purge/concentration swing absorbers and parametric pumping. Extractors are contacting units in which immiscible liquid phases are contacted and component separation is achieved using a mass-separating agent. In the example above, the component C in the second process stream would be the mass-separating agent. An example of an extractor unit is an aromatics extraction unit wherein a hydrocarbon stream containing both aromatic species and non-aromatic species are contacted with a mass separating agent such as sulfolane or morpholine and efficient contacting of these two immiscible liquids results in extraction of essentially all of the aromatic species from the hydrocarbon stream into the stream containing the mass separating agent. Component separation units can also include a zone of catalytic materials to facilitate desired chemical reactions in the component separation unit. Examples of such include reactive distillation units and extractive distillation units.
The present invention advantageously provides a method of removing contaminants from a contaminated process stream. The method preferably is performed by passing the process stream over a plurality of reticulated elements in a process unit. The reticulated elements are randomly packed in the process unit such that there is significant void space between each reticulated element to enhance filtration of contaminants on a surface of the reticulated elements while allowing the decontaminated process stream to pass unimpeded through the plurality of reticulated elements. A surface can include an inner surface and an outer surface. Reticulated elements made in accordance with the present invention will have more inner surface area available for filtering than outer surface area. Reticulated elements can include foam materials and monolith materials. Foam materials generally have a random pattern, while the monoliths have a more uniform pattern. The reticulated elements can be made from any commercially available materials, for example, zirconia toughened alumina, commonly referred to as ZTA. ZTA is available, in a ceramic foam, from Fiber Ceramics, Inc. headquartered in Cudahy, Wis. Another suitable type of ceramic is a monolith, which is manufactured by Corning, Inc. headquartered in Corning, N.Y. The process stream can be a liquid stream, a vapor phase, or a combination of both phases, and the contaminants can include dirt, iron oxide, iron sulfide, asphaltenes, coke fines, soot, catalyst fines, acidic impurities, sediments or other entrained foreign particulate matter, salts in distillation columns, particulates in gas streams, or sulfur or sulfides from tail gas units. The process stream can also be an organic-based process stream. The reticulated elements should be provided in an amount sufficient to remove some or all of the contaminants from the process stream. Another feature of the present invention may include the step of providing a decontaminated process stream for further processing.
More particularly, the invention relates to a process for improving stream quality of process streams entering to process units. An exemplary example includes improving stream quality of organic-based process streams going to catalytic bed process units. Preferably, the catalytic bed process units use discrete, solid element, fixed catalyst beds. The catalytic bed process units can include hydrotreater, hydrorefiner, hydrocracker, reformer, alkylation, dealkylation, isomerization, oxidation, esterification, and polymerization reactors. The discrete solid catalyst particles may be contained in one or more fixed beds and in either an upflow, down flow or radial flow design.
In addition to catalytic bed process units, the reticulated elements of the present invention can be used to remove contaminants from other types of process equipment. Such process equipment can include incinerators, scrubbers, tail gas treaters, and distillation columns and any manufacturing units that operate in a continuous fashion. When used to remove contaminants in a distillation column, the reticulated elements can be placed in the bottom of, or at any position in, the distillation column to act as a filter to remove salts or other contaminants from the distillation process. Removal of salts or other contaminants will reduce the pressure drop across the tower, allow for better separation efficiency in the column, and increase the time between downtimes typically required to remove these salts or other contaminants from the column.
The present invention also advantageously provides a method of perpendicular flow distribution in process units. This perpendicular flow distribution method includes providing one or more reticulated elements in the process unit. When only one reticulated element is used, it is typically large enough to effectively span the process unit. When multiple reticulated elements are used, they are typically arranged in a randomly packed bed. Regardless of the configuration of the reticulated elements, each reticulated element has a plurality of web members that define a plurality of flow passageways through the reticulated element. A process stream contacted with the plurality of reticulated elements is therefore subdivided into a plurality of smaller fluid streams by passing the process stream through the plurality of flow passageways defined by the web members of each reticulated element. The flows of the process stream through the flow passageways within the reticulated elements and through the void spaces between the reticulated elements when multiple reticulated elements are used provides for effective flow distribution perpendicular to the flow of the process stream through the process unit. This method can be applied to process streams that are entering the process unit, at any location within the process unit, at the exit from the process unit or any combination of these locations. This method can be applied to process streams while concurrently providing for filtration of contaminants from the process stream. This method can be applied to process streams while concurrently performing catalytic reactions to partially or totally remove or convert desired chemical species in the process stream.
An additional feature of the present invention can include the step of using reticulated elements in a variety of shapes. The shapes can include substantially spherical shaped balls, monoliths, squares, raschig rings, saddles, hollow cylinders, perforated disks, disks, single sheets, and solid cylinders, among others. Each shape can be sized to individual specifications. Sizes for the shapes used can include substantially spherical balls of about ⅛ to 2-inch diameters; monoliths with widths of about ⅛ to 2-inches and lengths of about ⅛ to 2-inches; squares with widths of about ⅛ to 2-inches and lengths of about ⅛ to 2-inches; raschig rings with inside diameters of about ⅛ to 1 inch and outside diameters of about ¼ to 1½ inches, and heights of about ¼ to 2 inches; saddle shapes with radii of about ¼ to 2 inches; hollow cylinders having inside diameters of about ⅛ to 1¼ inches, outside diameters of about ¼ to 2 inches, and heights of about ¼ to 3 inches; and solid cylinders having diameters of about ⅛ to 1 inch and heights of about ¼ to 2 inches. Custom-made one-piece disks or single sheet construction can be custom-fit to the physical configuration of a reactor. A further feature of this aspect of the present invention is that the reticulated elements can be formed in either a disk or single sheet, each optionally having perforations. An additional feature of the present invention is that the reticulated elements when constructed can be formed into a plurality of segments in order to form an assembled sheet or disk that is custom-fit to the reactor's physical configuration.
An additional feature of the present invention can include the step of using reticulated elements in a variety of porosities and pore sizes. The reticulated elements can be manufactured such that they have a porosity of so many pores per inch (“ppi”). For example, this means that a reticulated element of 30 ppi will, when examined by one skilled in the art, have on average 30 pores per inch. Given that there are about 25 millimeters per inch, the pore sizes of such a material would be just under one millimeter. Pore size in this context is the general size of the cavity of the pore recognizing that pores are not perfect spheres. Another important element of pore size is the size of the window opening into the pore. It is this measure that determines the size of the largest particle that is trapped or filtered within the pore. The porosity range of the reticulated elements of the present invention is from about 4 to about 800 ppi. This enables customization of the size and shape of the reticulated elements for the application constraints including particulate loading and pressure drop constraints. The pores of the reticulated elements can be in a range of about 6 millimeters to about 100 microns, each being defined by a plurality of web members forming a plurality of flow passageways through the reticulated elements. The surface area of these materials can vary even if the ppi value remains constant.
An additional feature of the present invention can include the step of using reticulated elements with different pore sizes in the same process unit so as to remove contaminant materials of a broad range of sizes. The materials of the present invention can filter contaminants down to about 1 micron in size. Commercially available retention materials are capable of trapping particles down to about 50 micron in size.
Another feature of the present invention advantageously provides providing a plurality of reticulated elements over an entire length of a process unit. The plurality of reticulated elements can be commingled throughout the process unit with a catalyst, with multiple catalysts or with other materials, such as structured packing materials and the like.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the step of contacting the contaminated process stream with the reticulated elements may include depositing a catalyst on the reticulated elements prior to contacting the contaminated process stream. Another feature of this aspect of the present invention may include the use of reticulated elements as a substrate having a substantially uniform coating of a selected catalyst including a porous alumina coating with a Group VI-B metal or a Group VIII metal, or both. Preferably, the Group VI-B metal is molybdenum and preferably, the Group VIII metal is either nickel or cobalt. More preferably, the Group VI-B metal and Group VIII metal are impregnated into the reticulated elements. The method of the present invention is useful to extend the run life of the catalyst bed. The catalytically active reticulated elements can be utilized to react diolefins or other polymer precursors and also to act as a filter and as a flow distributor. By filtering solids and partially reacting any polymer precursors, e.g., diolefins, fouling of the catalyst is reduced effectively extending the run time of the reactor.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the filtration method may include the step of filtering solid particulate material or sediments that form within a process unit in order to reduce fouling or plugging of downstream equipment. This aspect of the present invention may include the steps of providing one or more reticulated elements; contacting a process stream containing the particulate material or sediments with the reticulated elements; removing the particulate material or sediments from the process stream; and providing a relatively particulate material or sediments-free process stream for further processing. The reticulated elements can be located at one or more locations within the process unit or at the outlet of the process unit or a combination of both. This method of removing sediments can also be used in distillation columns to provide a relatively sediment free process stream for further processing. The method of the present invention for filtering process streams in catalytic bed process units, when compared with prior art methods, has the advantages of reducing the volume of retention materials required; lowering capital costs; improving the filtration of the solid particular matter from the feed streams; decreasing the pressure drop across the system; increasing run time of the reactor; allowing for the use of catalysts that have higher activity, lowering operating costs; increasing process safety; and reducing environmental concerns.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the foregoing advantages have also been achieved through the present apparatus and method for separating at least one process stream into one or more component process streams having desired compositions using CELLDIST materials in a component separation unit.
The method may include the steps of providing CELLDIST materials in the component separation unit, positioning the CELLDIST materials within at least one zone of the component separation unit (hereinafter referred to as the “unit”), introducing two or more phases of the process stream into the zone containing the CELLDIST materials, contacting the two or more phases at or near the surface of the CELLDIST materials to facilitate mass transfer and recovering at least a portion of one or more of the phases from the unit as one or more component process streams, wherein the component process streams have a desired composition.
A feature of the present invention is that the phases have desired compositions upon exiting the zone of CELLDIST material. One or more component process streams can be recovered from one or more locations between the top of the unit and the bottom of the unit. In one embodiment, the surface of the CELLDIST material can have a surface area of up to about 4000 square meters per cubic meter of CELLDIST material in the unit. Preferably, the surface of the CELLDIST material has a surface area in the range of about 250-4000 square meters per cubic meter of CELLDIST material in the unit.
In one aspect, the solid component of the CELLDIST materials in the unit can be selected from the group consisting of oxides, carbides, nitrides, borides, a ceramic material, a metallic material, a polymeric material and a chemical vapor deposition material or combinations thereof. CELLDIST material can also be formed from a corrosion resistant material or predominantly from silicon carbide.
A feature of the present invention is that the component separation unit can include both CELLDIST materials and one or more conventional unit internals. The process streams entering the unit may be vapor steams, liquid streams or a combination of both. One or more phases contained within the unit can be passed through one or more zones of CELLDIST material installed within the unit.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of altering the composition of at least one process stream in a component separation unit can include positioning at least one bed of CELLDIST material within a unit, creating two or more desired phases from the at least one process stream, passing the two or more phases through the at least one bed of CELLDIST material, whereby the composition of the two or more phases is changed as it passes through the CELLDIST material, thereby producing at least one component process stream with a desired composition, and recovering the at least one component process stream from the unit. A feature of the invention is that one or more component process streams are recovered from locations between the top of the unit and the bottom of the unit. In one aspect, the bed or beds of CELLDIST material are custom fit to the cross sectional configuration of the unit. In another aspect, the bed or beds of CELLDIST material is comprised of a plurality of randomly packed elements.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of altering the composition of at least one process stream via distillation in a distillation unit can include positioning at least one bed of CELLDIST material within a distillation unit, creating desired phases from the at least one process stream, passing the phases through the at least one bed of CELLDIST material, whereby the composition of the phases is changed as it passes through the CELLDIST material, thereby producing at least one component process stream with a desired composition, and recovering the at least one component process stream from the distillation unit. A feature of the invention is that one or more component process streams are recovered from locations between the top of the distillation unit and the bottom of the distillation unit. In one aspect, the bed or beds of CELLDIST material are custom fit to the cross sectional configuration of the distillation unit. In another aspect, the bed or beds of CELLDIST material is comprised of a plurality of randomly packed CELLDIST elements.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of altering the composition of at least one process stream via absorption in an absorber can include positioning at least one bed of CELLDIST material within an absorber, creating two or more desired phases from the at least one process stream, passing the two or more phases through the at least one bed of CELLDIST material, whereby the composition of the two or more phases is changed as they pass through the CELLDIST material, thereby producing at least one component process stream with a desired composition, and recovering the at least one component process stream from the absorber. A feature of the invention is that one or more component process streams are recovered from locations between the top of the absorber and the bottom of the absorber. In one aspect, the bed or beds of CELLDIST material are custom fit to the cross sectional configuration of the absorber. In another aspect, the bed or beds of CELLDIST material is comprised of a plurality of randomly packed CELLDIST elements.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of altering the composition of at least one process stream via extraction in an extractor can include positioning at least one bed of CELLDIST material within a extractor, creating desired phases from the at least one process stream, passing the phases through the at least one bed of CELLDIST material, whereby the composition of the phases is changed as it passes through the CELLDIST material, thereby producing at least one component process stream with a desired composition, and recovering the at least one component process stream from the extractor. A feature of the invention is that one or more component process streams are recovered from locations between the top of the extractor and the bottom of the extractor. In one aspect, the bed or beds of CELLDIST material are custom fit to the cross sectional configuration of the extractor. In another aspect, the bed or beds of CELLDIST material is comprised of a plurality of randomly packed CELLDIST elements.
Another aspect of the present invention involves facilitating the separation of process streams into component process steams via mass transfer in a component separation unit. The unit preferably has one or more beds of CELLDIST material. Such one or more beds can be composed of a plurality of randomly packed CELLDIST material or CELLDIST material that is custom fit to the unit's cross sectional configuration or a combination thereof. The depths of the one or more beds is set so as to provide the required number of theoretical stages to achieve the desired separation of some or all of one or more of the species in the process streams.
In yet another aspect, the present invention relates to a component separation unit assembly with at least one CELLDIST material disposed therein, wherein the amount of at least one CELLDIST material in the unit preferably is sufficient to provide the number of theoretical stages required to separate one or more process streams into component process streams containing desired compositions of certain of the species in the one or more process streams.
The methods and assemblies of the present invention for separating one or more process streams into component process streams having desired compositions using CELLDIST materials in a component separation unit, when compared with prior art methods, have the advantages, among others, of reducing the complexity and cost of designing, fabricating, installing, operating and maintaining units and of providing more efficient contacting of process streams to achieve the desired separation.
In the drawings:
While the invention will be described in connection with the preferred embodiment, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as may be included within the spirit and the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
With reference to
The present invention advantageously provides a method of removing contaminants from a contaminated process stream. The method preferably is performed by providing reticulated elements preferably randomly packed with a void space between each reticulated element to enhance filtration of contaminants in such a way that the decontaminated process stream may pass through the reticulated material unimpeded. The present invention provides a method whereby the entirety of the reticulated elements can be utilized to filter contaminants from the process stream. In catalytic bed process units, the reticulated elements can be sized such that the catalyst bed has exhausted its catalytic activity before the reticulated elements have exhausted their ability to filter out contaminant particles. This method enables use of the entire bed of reticulated elements, as opposed to current methods that eventually clog the top six to twelve inches of the retention materials conventionally available. With such materials, beds deeper than about one foot are essentially of no use in removing particulate contaminants from process streams. Further, with such materials, once the top of the bed is plugged, the pressure drop in the equipment begins to escalate, requiring a shutdown to remove and replace the clogged materials from the process unit.
Data has been collected from different process units that have experimented with the reticulated elements of the present invention. The reticulated elements of the current invention have performed dramatically better than conventional retention materials available commercially.
Use in a Distillate Hydrotreater
Data were obtained from a refinery for four distillate hydrotreaters in virtually identical process conditions. Two of the hydrotreaters, A and B, contained conventional reticulated materials, known as “ring grading systems.” The remaining two hydrotreaters, C and D, used the reticulated elements of the present invention.
A typical pressure drop scenario is to have a low pressure drop for the first months of operation, but then, at a time that is not predictable, the pressure increases significantly over a relatively short period to a point where the unit must be shutdown to remove the pluggage, replace the removed material and restart the unit. This can be problematic given the unpredictability of the event, the need to acquire replacement materials with very short lead-time or to maintain sufficient extra inventory of replacement materials or to extend the down-time to await delivery of replacement materials. With use of the reticulated elements in accordance with the methods described herein, the pressure drop remains low for a predictable period of time based on the level of contaminants in the process stream and the capacity of the reticulated elements loaded in the process unit. Sufficient reticulated elements may be loaded such that the catalyst in the unit is exhausted before the reticulated elements are saturated.
Use in a Naphtha Hydrotreater
Data was obtained from a refinery with four naphtha hydrotreaters. Three of the hydrotreaters (A, B, and C) used conventional ring grading systems, while the remaining hydrotreater (D) used the reticulated elements of the present invention.
Referring again to
By passing the process stream through a plurality of flow passageways 120 (
For catalytic bed process units, methods of the present invention filter particulate contaminants before they reach the catalytic bed. This allows for increased efficiency of the catalyst bed since more of the surface area of the catalyst is available for use as a catalyst when compared to systems with conventional retention materials, such as the ring grading systems used in Examples 1 and 2. As a result, smaller sized, more catalytically active catalyst elements can be used due to the lower average pressure drop of the unit resulting in a gain in catalyst activity of about 10%-15%.
The reticulated material 15 may be used to filter and retain particulates 36 from the outgoing process stream 38. Small particulate material 36 that may be entrained in the outlet process stream may be filtered, or captured, from the process stream 38 and retained by reticulated material layers 40, 42. Preferably, the size of the reticulated material in layers 40, 42 is graduated from a size in layer 40 to another size in layer 42 at the outlet 44 of the reactor 22. In addition, sediments of material may form in the process unit, e.g., sediments formed by excessive hydrocracking of residual oils that may plug or foul downstream equipment. These sediments may be filtered from the outgoing process stream 38 by the reticulated material 15. Preferably, the size of the reticulated material in layers 40, 42 is graduated from a size in layer 40 to another size in layer 42 at the outlet 44 of the reactor 22. Alternately, the invention may also be used in an up flow configuration wherein the contaminated process stream 46 would instead enter the unit at 44 at the lower end 39 and the outlet process stream 25 would exit the process unit at 24 at the upper end 47 of reactor 22.
As previously discussed, another advantage of the present invention is to react activated or partially activated reticulated material 15 with polymer precursors in a contaminated process stream 20. Condensation polymerization of diolefins may occur in the process unit 32 after the contaminated process stream 20 is heated, generally prior to introduction into the process unit 22, thereby forming foulants in the process unit 32 itself that may gum or plug the process unit 32. As the foulants form in the process unit, they cannot be filtered from the contaminated process stream 20 before flowing across the fluid entry cross-section 34. Therefore, the layer or layers 26, 28, 40, 42 of reticulated material 15 may be coated with an alumina powder that may also act as a substrate for catalyst materials to form partially activated reticulated material. As used herein, an “activated support” means (1) a reticulated material that has been impregnated with catalyst materials or (2) a reticulated material that may be an oxide, nitride, or carbide of a metal or (3) a reticulated material that contains zeolite or inorganic oxides, e.g., alumina, silica, silica-alumina, magnesia, silica-magnesia or titania. As used herein, a “partially activated support” means an activated support material that has been purposefully made less active or partially deactivated in order to achieve a slower reaction rate or to partially react the materials contacted.
With regard to contaminated process streams, coated reticulated material 15 may also be used, wherein the coating may comprise one of several conventional catalysts. Alumina may be used as an active coating, optionally but preferably, alumina may be used as a support to strengthen the catalyst. The catalyst according to this invention preferably comprises a metal of Group VI-B or a member of Group VIII, or both, impregnated into an alumina based support. Accordingly, the catalyst may comprise at least one of chromium, molybdenum and tungsten in combination with at least one of iron, nickel, cobalt, platinum, palladium and iridium. The use of palladium is particularly useful in the removal of acetylene and diolefins from ethylene, the removal of oxygen, the removal of hydrogen. Of the Group VI-B metals, molybdenum is most preferred. The catalyst preferably will contain from about 2% to about 14% by weight of Group VI-B metal. Of the Group VIII metals, nickel and cobalt are most preferred. The amount of Group VIII metal in the catalyst is preferably from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight.
With reference to
Layers 66, 68, 70 of reticulated material 15 are provided in the reactor 46 below the inlet 52 and mixing chamber 64 in an amount sufficient to filter the process stream 51 and the partially reacted process stream 62. Preferably, the multiple layers 66, 68, 70 are provided such that the porosity of the reticulated material 15 is graduated from a porosity in layer 66 to another porosity in layer 68 to another porosity in layer 70 as the incoming contaminated process stream flows through the reticulated material 15. Optionally, the present invention may be practiced with or without conventional basket screens 72. Preferably, the fixed catalyst beds 48, 50 contain discrete solid catalyst particles 74.
Another feature of the present invention advantageously provides providing a plurality of reticulated elements 15 over an entire length of a process unit. The plurality of reticulated elements 15 can be commingled throughout the process unit with a catalyst 19, as shown in
As previously discussed, an advantage of the present invention is that it may also be used to distribute the process stream. The process stream 51 may also be distributed while being filtered by subdividing the incoming process stream into a plurality of smaller fluid streams by passing the process stream through a plurality of flow passageways 120 (
Another feature of the present invention is that the reticulated material 15 may also be used to capture and retain catalyst particles 74 from the outflowing partially reacted process stream 58 and the reacted process stream 54. The reticulated material 126 in layers 78, 80 at the outlet 61 of the first fixed bed 48 and the reticulated material 126 in layers 82, 84 at the outlet 56 of the second fixed bed 50 are used to filter and retain catalyst particles 74 that may be entrained in the partially reacted process stream 58 or reacted process stream 54. As discussed with reference to
A further advantage of the present invention is that the reticulated material 15 may be activated or impregnated with catalytically active material to react with polymer precursors in process streams 51, 62. As depicted in
Activated or partially activated reticulated material as described above may be used to control the hydrogenation rate of the diolefins or other polymer precursors to prevent fouling or gum formation. When endothermic reactions require the addition of heat to the partially reacted process stream 58, preferably the reticulated material 15 of layer 70 is also activated or partially activated. The invention may also be practiced with coated reticulated material, wherein the coating may comprise one of several conventional catalysts. Alumina may be used on an active coating or support. The catalyst according to this invention preferably comprises a metal of Group VI-B or a member of Group VIII, or both, impregnated into the reticulated material, inorganic oxide or zeolite. Accordingly, the catalyst may comprise at least one of chromium, molybdenum and tungsten in combination with at least one of iron, nickel, cobalt, platinum, palladium and iridium. Of the Group VI-B metals, molybdenum is most preferred. The catalyst preferably will contain from about 2% to about 14% by weight of Group VI-B metal. Of the Group VIII metals, nickel and cobalt are most preferred. The amount of Group VIII metal in the catalyst is preferably from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight.
Alternatively, in
With reference to
The reticulated elements can be used to filter contaminants, such as sediments, in other types of process equipment.
The present invention also advantageously provides a method of perpendicular flow distribution in process units. This perpendicular flow distribution method includes providing one or more reticulated elements in the process unit. When only one reticulated element is used, it is typically large enough to effectively span the process unit. When multiple reticulated elements are used, they are typically arranged in a randomly packed bed. Regardless of the configuration of the reticulated elements, each reticulated element has a plurality of web members that define a plurality of flow passageways through the reticulated element. A process stream contacted with the plurality of reticulated elements is therefore subdivided into a plurality of smaller fluid streams by passing the process stream through the plurality of flow passageways defined by the web members of each reticulated element. The flows of the process stream through the flow passageways within the reticulated elements and through the void spaces between the reticulated elements when multiple reticulated elements are used provides for effective flow distribution perpendicular to the flow of the process stream through the process unit. This method can be applied to process streams that are entering the process unit, at any location within the process unit, at the exit from the process unit or any combination of these locations, as illustrated in
An additional feature of the present invention can include the step of using reticulated elements in a variety of porosities and pore sizes, as shown in
As an advantage of the present invention, the filtering method provides for more efficient filtration within the process unit. Since the contaminants do not cake up on the first inches of the reticulated elements, as with conventional retention materials, all of the filter bed can be effectively used. Pressure drop through the reticulated elements can remain low as long as sufficient reticulated elements are utilized such that the process unit reaches an end-of-run condition other than pressure drop increase. The lower pressure drop increases the safety of operating the unit since downstream equipment is not deprived of flow and the upstream equipment does not pressure up. The run times between catalyst changes are significantly increased since the process equipment can operate much longer than with previous filtration methods before the process equipment end-of-run conditions.
Another advantage of the present invention is that smaller sized catalysts can be used in catalyst bed process units since the catalyst bed is subjected to a much lower cycle-average pressure drop. The result of using the smaller, more catalytically reactive catalyst is a gain in activity of about 10% to about 15%. The entire surface area of the catalyst can be used for its intended purpose, which is to modify and increase the rate of a reaction, due to a much lower average pressure drop per cycle for the process unit.
Another advantage of the present invention is, as depicted in
With reference to
Referring to
The CELLDIST material 15 may be composed of any material that is capable of being fabricated into the required structure, and able to withstand the temperature, pressure, corrosivity and other requirements of component separation unit operation. Inert CELLDIST material 15 can be used when no reactivity with the components in the process stream is desired. In another embodiment, the CELLDIST material 15 is composed of a non-metallic material in order to allow for treatment of corrosive systems such as hydrochloric or sulfuric acid, to decrease design cost, installation time and to reduce heat loss in the unit.
The CELLDIST material 15 can take a variety of shapes with openly connected pores forming pathways or passageways 120 as illustrated in
Porosity of CELLDIST materials is measured in units of pores per inch (“ppi”). The porosity of porous materials is graduated as known to those skilled in the art. Microporous materials have the smallest pore sizes, generally from about five Angstroms to about five nanometers. Mesoporous materials generally have pore sizes of about five nanometers to about fifty nanometers. Macroporous materials have pore sizes in excess of about fifty nanometers. CELLDIST material comprised of macroporous pores or cells can have a random pattern as illustrated in
In an embodiment of the present invention, phases are passed through one or more zones of CELLDIST material 15 positioned within the unit, as illustrated in
In one embodiment, the CELLDIST material 15 is in the form of a single structured element, as illustrated in
There may be voidage, or open space, within the pores of, or surrounding the exterior of, the CELLDIST material 15 in the unit. Typically, a high voidage space or void fraction corresponds to a high porosity and a low pressure drop within the unit, which is desirable for separation purposes. The internal void fraction of the CELLDIST material 15 of the present invention is preferably as high as 70 percent. By comparison, the voidages found in most currently available metallic structured packings are about 98-99 percent, and are about 65 percent for nonmetallic structured packing. While certain of these prior art materials may have higher void fractions than that of the present invention, the increase in mass transfer efficiency associated with the increased surface area of the CELLDIST material 15 of the present invention can allow the unit to be operated at a lower flooding number. This will preferably result in the same, or better, productivity for a unit operated with CELLDIST material 15 according to the present invention than a unit utilizing the prior art materials with higher voidage percentages.
The CELLDIST material 15 also exhibits good wettability characteristics when compared to prior art packing materials. Wettability relates to the level of contacting and distribution of phases on the surface of the packing material and is affected by the structure of the material. A high wettability value is critical for avoiding maldistribution of phases within the unit.
In general, a packing material that achieves a high theoretical number of stages at a given flooding factor with a low pressure drop is an efficient and preferred packing material. The goal is to minimize the amount of packing material used and yet produce the number of theoretical stages that will result in the desired separation. The CELLDIST material 15 of the present invention advantageously exhibits high separation efficiency and low pressure drop characteristics when compared to prior art materials used in component separation units, which is a result of the increased surface area and preferred voidage and wettability characteristics of the CELLDIST material 15.
It is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials, or embodiments shown and described, as obvious modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. For example, special liquid distributors or conventional liquid distributors could be used with the reticulated elements to facilitate the spreading of the liquid across process equipment. Conversely, the reticulated elements could be used only for particulate removal. Accordingly, the invention is therefore to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application of, and claims the benefit of, U.S. application Ser. No. 12/786,140 filed, May 24, 2010, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,421,067, which is a divisional of, U.S. application Ser. No. 11/136,631 filed May 24, 2005, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,722,832, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/396,851, filed Mar. 25, 2003, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,265,189.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 436414 | Graham | Sep 1890 | A |
| 578548 | Deruelle | Mar 1897 | A |
| 598351 | Staub | Feb 1898 | A |
| 1947777 | Huff et al. | Feb 1934 | A |
| 2006078 | Pyzel | Jun 1935 | A |
| 2055162 | Friedrich | Sep 1936 | A |
| 2153599 | Thomas | Apr 1939 | A |
| 2183657 | Page | Dec 1939 | A |
| 2212932 | Fairlie | Aug 1940 | A |
| 2408164 | Foster | Sep 1946 | A |
| 2439021 | Quigg | Apr 1948 | A |
| 2571958 | Slaughter et al. | Oct 1951 | A |
| 2739118 | Comte | Mar 1956 | A |
| 2793017 | Lake | May 1957 | A |
| 2893852 | Montgomery | Jul 1959 | A |
| 2919981 | Calva | Jan 1960 | A |
| 2985589 | Broughton et al. | May 1961 | A |
| 3090094 | Schwartzwalder et al. | May 1963 | A |
| 3100688 | Dess | Aug 1963 | A |
| 3151187 | Comte | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3167600 | Worman | Jan 1965 | A |
| 3169839 | Calva | Feb 1965 | A |
| 3171820 | Volz | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3175918 | McGahan | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3208833 | Carson | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3214247 | Broughton | Oct 1965 | A |
| 3232589 | Eckert | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3361839 | Lester | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3410057 | Lerner | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3423185 | Ballard et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3431082 | Sellin | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3487112 | Paulik et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3489529 | Dudych et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
| 3498755 | Borre | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3506248 | Starbuck et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3544457 | Fredrick et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3562800 | Carlson | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3563887 | Sommers et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3635943 | Stewart | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3657864 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3685971 | Carson | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3706812 | Derosset et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3717670 | Schultz | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3732078 | Kassarjian | May 1973 | A |
| 3787188 | Lyon | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3787189 | Lovell et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3789989 | Carson | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3796657 | Protorius et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3844936 | Newson | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3888633 | Grosboll et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3892583 | Winter et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3898180 | Crooks et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3947347 | Mitchell | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3960508 | Bessant et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3962078 | Hirs | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3992282 | Grosboll et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4029482 | Postma et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| RE29314 | Carlson et al. | Jul 1977 | E |
| RE29315 | Carlson et al. | Jul 1977 | E |
| 4033727 | Vautrain | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4086307 | Glaspie | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4149862 | Sewell, Sr. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4188197 | Amberkar et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4197205 | Hirs | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4203935 | Hackenjos | May 1980 | A |
| 4251239 | Clyde et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4285910 | Kennedy, Jr. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4329318 | Le Grouyellec et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4342643 | Kyan | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4374020 | Trevino et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4378292 | Haase | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4380529 | Gupta | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4402832 | Gerhold | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4443559 | Smith, Jr. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4478721 | Gerhold | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4483771 | Koch | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4487727 | Ballato, Jr. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4504396 | Vardi et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4511519 | Hsia | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4568595 | Morris | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4569821 | Duperray et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4579647 | Smith | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4615796 | Kramer | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4642089 | Zupkas et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4642397 | Zinnen et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4668442 | Lang | May 1987 | A |
| 4669890 | Peyrot | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4681674 | Graven et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4691031 | Suciu et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4708852 | Helbling, Jr. et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4711930 | Hoelderick et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4719090 | Masaki | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4726825 | Natale | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4775460 | Reno | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4788040 | Campagnolo et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4798676 | Matkovich | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4810685 | Twigg et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4830736 | Hung et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4849569 | Smith, Jr. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4859642 | Hoelderick et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4863712 | Twigg et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4880541 | Chiron et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4938422 | Koves | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4950834 | Arganbright et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4954251 | Barnes et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4968651 | Crabtree | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4971771 | Stahl | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4982022 | Smith, Jr. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4985211 | Akihama et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5013426 | Vu et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5017542 | Matan et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5043506 | Crossland | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5055627 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5104546 | Filson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5113015 | Palmer et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5118873 | Smith, Jr. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122276 | Loikits | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5143700 | Anguil | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5177961 | Whittenberger | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5189001 | Johnson | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5202097 | Poussin | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5217603 | Inoue et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5235102 | Palmer et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5243115 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5248836 | Bakshi et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5298226 | Nowobilski | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5304423 | Niknafs et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5326512 | Stillwagon et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5336656 | Campbell | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5368722 | Bartholdy | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5384300 | Feeley et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5384302 | Gerdes et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5399535 | Whitman | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5409375 | Butcher | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5446223 | Smith, Jr. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5454947 | Olapinski et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5476978 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5510056 | Jacobs et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5512530 | Gerdes et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5523503 | Funk et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5538544 | Nowobilski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5558029 | Peake | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5599363 | Percy | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5624547 | Sudhakar et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| D381394 | Lex, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | S |
| 5660715 | Trimble et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5670095 | Southam | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5766290 | Zievers et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5767470 | Cha | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5779993 | Gentry | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5785851 | Morris et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5799596 | Peake | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5817594 | McNamara et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5853579 | Rummier et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853582 | Grangeon et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5866736 | Chen | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5873998 | Grangeon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5895572 | Joulin et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5901575 | Sunder | May 1999 | A |
| 5910241 | McNamara et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5943969 | Peake | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5972214 | Callebert et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6024871 | Harter et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033629 | Friederick et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6036743 | Butcher et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6096278 | Gary | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117812 | Gao et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6156197 | Dessapt et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6242661 | Podrebarac et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258900 | Glover et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6262131 | Arcuri et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6284022 | Sachweh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6291603 | Glover et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6315972 | Mehdizadeh et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6352579 | Hirata et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6402959 | Dessapt et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6454948 | Ferschneider et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6521562 | Clem et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6583329 | Podrebarac | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6630078 | Kourtakis et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6713772 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6797175 | Hotier | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6835224 | Cheng | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6890878 | Moore | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7014175 | Honnell | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7125490 | Clendenning et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7255917 | Rochlin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7265189 | Glover | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7314551 | Frey et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7390403 | Siwak | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7393510 | Glover | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7427385 | Scheirer et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7527671 | Stuecker et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7722832 | Glover et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7741502 | Lecocq et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 8062521 | Glover | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8282890 | Niknafa et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8293195 | Blanchard | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8313709 | Glover | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8500852 | Galbraith | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8524164 | Glover | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8550157 | O'Malley | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8663474 | Niazi | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 9056268 | Jones et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9101863 | Glover | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9205392 | Byl et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9352292 | Solantie et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9732774 | Glover | Aug 2017 | B1 |
| 10054140 | Glover et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10161428 | Glover et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10421067 | Glover | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10421068 | Glover | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10449531 | Glover | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 20010015336 | Glover | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020146358 | Smith et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030125594 | Moore | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040031729 | Meier et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040084352 | Meier et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192862 | Glover et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225085 | Glover et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050240038 | Gobbel et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050255014 | Glover | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060009648 | Gobbel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060108274 | Frey et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060196826 | Glover | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060251555 | Warner et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060275185 | Tonkovich et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070158277 | Bachand et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265357 | Iversen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080044316 | Glover | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080296216 | Glover | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090044702 | Adamek et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090146339 | Malone et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090211441 | Reyes et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090283479 | Warner et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100209315 | Niknafs | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100243519 | Glover et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100243520 | Glover et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110200478 | Billiet | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120211438 | Glover | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120237434 | Blanchard et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130306562 | Stifter et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20150053627 | Silin et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150129512 | Thiyagarajan | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20160136603 | Parihar et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20170189834 | Glover et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170234339 | Glover | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20180008952 | Glover | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180023598 | Glover | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180093207 | Glover et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20190048903 | Glover et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190217283 | Glover et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190242412 | Glover et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190285098 | Glover et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190301498 | Glover | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190301499 | Glover | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2004232690 | Nov 2004 | AU |
| 2010203014 | Aug 2010 | AU |
| 2019928 | Dec 1991 | CA |
| 2520071 | Apr 2004 | CA |
| 2297113 | Feb 2005 | CA |
| 2570527 | Dec 2005 | CA |
| 202072546 | Dec 2011 | CN |
| 203382593 | Jan 2014 | CN |
| 585595 | Oct 1933 | DE |
| 3539195 | May 1986 | DE |
| 73150 | Oct 1933 | EP |
| 260826 | Mar 1988 | EP |
| 576096 | Dec 1993 | EP |
| 639544 | Feb 1995 | EP |
| 651041 | May 1995 | EP |
| 719578 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 1001837 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0899011 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 1606038 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 1755766 | Feb 2007 | EP |
| 3040119 | Jun 2016 | EP |
| 3397364 | Nov 2018 | EP |
| 3414003 | Dec 2018 | EP |
| 2480137 | Oct 1981 | FR |
| 2851559 | Aug 2004 | FR |
| 267877 | Jan 1927 | GB |
| 374707 | Jul 1932 | GB |
| 429616 | Jun 1935 | GB |
| 933124 | Aug 1963 | GB |
| 1442085 | Jul 1976 | GB |
| 2108003 | May 1983 | GB |
| 2149771 | Jun 1985 | GB |
| 5237396 | Sep 1977 | JP |
| S58 (1983)-024308 | Feb 1983 | JP |
| S61 (1986)-134300 | Jun 1986 | JP |
| S61 (1986)-180818 | Aug 1986 | JP |
| 62114643 | May 1987 | JP |
| S63 (1988)-043632 | Mar 1988 | JP |
| H06 (1994)-205922 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| 1028876 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| 1057821 | Mar 1998 | JP |
| 11128734 | May 1999 | JP |
| 2000-246048 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 2003-120257 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2004-515432 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2004-530746 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 2004-537406 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2006-523139 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2007-514529 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2008-545527 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 5543817 | Jul 2014 | JP |
| 2016-13748 | Aug 2016 | JP |
| 2018-61955 | Apr 2018 | JP |
| 6324420 | May 2018 | JP |
| 1221298 | Jan 2013 | KR |
| 1009499 | Jan 2000 | NL |
| 542787 | Jun 2009 | NZ |
| 9903561 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| 2001001536 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| 2002045838 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 2002079346 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 2003013725 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| 2004094039 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2005058472 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| 2005123221 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006127671 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2010149908 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2017117492 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| 2017139597 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| 2019020705 | Jan 2019 | WO |
| 200508048 | Nov 2006 | ZA |
| Entry |
|---|
| Australian Government, IP Australia, Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application, Issued in connection to AU2017217834; 3 pages; dated Nov. 14, 2018; Australia. |
| Australian Government, IP Australia, Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application, Issued in connection to AU2016381170; 3 pages; dated Apr. 10, 2019; Australia. |
| Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property; Technical Examination Report, issued in connection to PI0613275-8; dated Feb. 25, 2016; 16 pages; Brazil. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Official Action, issued in connection with CA3009825; dated Jun. 18, 2019; 4 pages; Canada. |
| Chilean Patent and Trademark Office; Abstract Publication of CL2131-2018; Sep. 28, 2018; 1 page; Chile. |
| European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2005/020712; dated Mar. 3, 2006; 2 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2004/006366; dated Oct. 20, 2004; 2 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2006/019854; dated Jan. 17, 2007; 2 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2006/019854; dated Jan. 17, 2007; 5 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US98/14768; dated Nov. 26, 1998; 3 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2016/069396; dated Mar. 31, 2017; 3 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2016/069396; dated Mar. 31, 2017; 6 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communicaiton and Search Report, Issued in Connection to EP15192642.5; dated Jun. 2, 2016; 7 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communicaiton Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC, issued in connection to EP17706648.7; dated Sep. 19, 2018; 3 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communicaiton Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC, issued in connection to EP16834162.6; dated Aug. 8, 2018; 3 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP15192642.5; dated Mar. 13, 2019; 5 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Issued in Connection to EP04716499.1; dated May 9, 2016; 4 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP04716499.1; dated Mar. 10, 2017; 5 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Issued in Connection to EP04716499.1; dated Mar. 15, 2013; 4 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, issued in connection to EP04716499.1; dated Feb. 12, 2018; 6 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued in connection to EP18201370.6; dated Apr. 9, 2019; 6 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued in connection to EP15192642.5; dated Jun. 2, 2016; 6 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Mar. 16, 2009; 3 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Jun. 21, 2006; 4 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Sep. 10, 2004; 4 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Dec. 11, 2002; 3 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Oct. 8, 2001; 2 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP05760680.8; dated Jan. 28, 2009; 6 pages; Europe. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP05760680.8; dated Jul. 5, 2010; 5 pages; Europe. |
| Espacenet; English Translation of CN203382593U; Oct. 4, 2016; 7 pages; Europe. |
| Espacenet; English Translation of CN202072546U; Oct. 4, 2016; 11 pages; Europe. |
| Espacenet; English Translation of FR2851559A1; Oct. 4, 2016; 9 pages; Europe. |
| Espacenet; English Translation of WO2010149908A1; Oct. 4, 2016; 23 pages; Europe. |
| The International Bureau OT WIPO; PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Issued in Connection to PCT/2005/020712; dated Dec. 14, 2006; 5 pages; Switzerland. |
| The International Bureau OT WIPO; PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Issued in Connection to PCT/2004/006366; dated Oct. 1, 2005; 5 pages; Switzerland. |
| Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2010-246536; dated Sep. 1, 2012; 8 pages; Japan. |
| Japan Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection with JP2010-246536; dated Nov. 12, 2013; 6 pages; Japan. |
| Japan Patent Office; Certified Final Rejection, issued in connection with JP2010-246536; dated Jun. 25, 2014; 2 pages; Japan. |
| Japan Patent Office; Decision to Dismiss Amendment, issued in connection to JP2010-246536; dated Jun. 25, 2014; 3 pages; Japan. |
| Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection of Japanese Patent Application 2016-017373; dated Dec. 7, 2016; 11 pages; Japan. |
| Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2014-217190; dated Aug. 31, 2016; 6 pages; Japan. |
| Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2014-217190; dated Sep. 30, 2015; 8 pages; Japan. |
| Japanese Patent Office; Observation, issued in connection to JP2017-226648; dated Jul. 17, 2018; 50 pages; Japan. |
| Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2017-226648; dated Jan. 31, 2019; 10 pages; Japan. |
| Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Resons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2018-553847; dated May 29, 2019; 10 pages; Japan. |
| New Zealand Intellectual Property Office; First Examination Report, issued in connection to application No. 743895; dated Jan. 31, 2019; 5 pages; New Zealand. |
| New Zealand Intellectual Property Office; First Examination Report, issued in connection to application No. 743891; dated Nov. 6, 2018; 10 pages; New Zealand. |
| Behrens et al.; Performance of a Monolith-like Structured; Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 15 (2); pp. 49-57; 2001. |
| Beihai Huihuang Chemical Packing Co. Lts., http://77520.pub.diysite.com/sc.deliver/main/0-4-5/4/0-ma.html?siteid=77520; 10 pages; May 5, 2003. |
| Butcher; Reticulated Ceramic Foam as a Catalyst Support; Seminar for CatCon '98; Jun. 3-5, 1998; Ohio. |
| Ceramic Industry Cover page; and Table of Contents; vol. 147, No. 3; 2 pages; Mar. 1997. |
| Criterion; Technical Bulletin: Loading Your Hydrotreating Reactor for Maximum Activity; Criterion Catalysts & Technologies; 3 pages; 2008. |
| Fay; A Three-Point Generalization of the Ellipse; International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology; Jan. 2002; vol. 33, Issue 1; pp. 111-123. |
| Foseco Home Page; Internet; p. 1-3; Feb. 21, 1997. |
| Fulton; CE Refresher: Catalyst Engineering, Part 2, Selecting the Catalyst Configuaration; May 1986 Chemical engineering; pp. 97-101. |
| Gibson; Cellular Solids, MRS Bulletin; www.mrs.org/publications/bulleting; pp. 270-274; Apr. 2003. |
| Gibson et al.; Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties; Second Edition, Cambridge Solid State Science Series, Cambridge University Press; 71 pages; 1997. |
| Green et al.; Cellular Ceramics: Intriguing Structures, Novel Properties, and Innovative Applications; www.mrs.org/publications/bulletin; pp. 296-300; Apr. 2003. |
| Haldor Topsoe, Inc.; Material Safety Data Sheet Inert Topping TK-10; p. 1-4; 1992. |
| Hickman et al.; Production of Syngas by Direct Catalytic Ocidation of Methane; Science; vol. 256; p. 343-346; Jan. 15, 1993. |
| Hung et al.; Translation of DE3539195, Hydroprocessing Catalyzer with Specific Geometric Shate; 23 pages; May 2000. |
| Ivars Peterson's MathLand; Beyond the Ellipse; The Mathematical Association of America; Sep. 2, 1996; 3 pages. |
| Kim et al.; Effect of Inert Filler Addition on Pore Size and Porosity of Closed-Cell Silicon Oxycarbide Foams; Journal of Materials Science 39; pp. 3513-3515; 2004. |
| Loehrke and Nagib, AGARD Report No. R-598 Experiments on Management of Free-stream Turbulence 1972. |
| Materials 2017, 10(7), 735; “Improving the Strength of ZTA Foams with Different Strategies: Immersion Infiltration and Recoating;” https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10070735; 15 pages; Jul. 1, 2017. |
| Mills; Ceramic Technology Provides Refining Solutions, Saint-Gobain Norpro; pp. 1-17; 2003. |
| Mills; Ceramic Guard Bed Materials; Norton Chemical Process Products Corporation; Jun. 3-5, 1998; 24 pages; US. |
| Norton Chemical Process Products Corporation, MacroTrap Guard Bed Media; 6 pages: 1998. |
| Norton Chemical Process Products Copr.; Denstone Inert Catalyst Bed Supports; 10 pages; 1992; Ohio. |
| NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology; Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 85-101; 1990. |
| NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 98-118; 1991. |
| NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 104-135; 1992. |
| NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 94-112; 1993. |
| NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 98-139; 1994. |
| NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 96-123; 1995. |
| NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 131-160; 1996. |
| Olujic et al.; Distillation Column Internals/Configurations for Press . . . , Chem. Biochem, Eng. Q. 17 (4); pp. 301-309; 2003. |
| Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 7th Ed., McGraw-Hill, 1997, pp. 6-33-6-34. |
| Petrotech, vol. 4, pp. 382-383; 1981. |
| Product Bulletin: Criterion 855 MD “Medallions” Inert Catalyst Support; Aug. 1998; 2 pages. |
| Queheillalt et al.; Synthesis of Stochastic Open Cell Ni-Based Foams; Scripta Materialia 50; pp. 313-317; 2004. |
| Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notification of Provisional Rejection, issued in connection to application No. 10-2018-7021988; dated Oct. 22, 2019; 7 pages; Korea. |
| European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP17706648.7; dated Oct. 24, 2019; 7 pages; Europe. |
| Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notification of Provisional Rejection, issued in connection to application No. 10-2018-7026274; dated Oct. 22, 2019; 14 pages; Korea. |
| Schildhauer; Application of Film-Flow-Monoliths . . . , Technical Univesity Delft; Julianalaan 136, NL-2628 BL Delft; The Netherlands; 1 page; Oct. 29, 2003. |
| Scheffler, Michael; Cellular Ceramics: Structure, Manufacturing, Properties and Applications; Die Beutsche Bibliotheck; 2005; 5 pages; Germany. |
| Schlichting, Boundary-Layer Theory; McGraw-Hill; (Translation of Grenzschicht-Theorie, Translated by Dr. J. Kestin), 1979; pp. 230-234. |
| Selee Corporation; Product Brochure; 6 pages; 1997. |
| Selee Corporation Home Page; Internet; downloaded Nov. 14, 1996; 3 pages. |
| Selee Corporation; Ceramic Foam for Thermal/Kiln Furniture Applications; Ceramic Foam Kiln Furniture Phusical Property Data Sheet; Nov. 14, 1996; 2 pages. |
| Snyder Filtration; Nanofiltration Membranes; Retrieved Jun. 15, 2016 from: http://synderfiltration.com.nanofiltration/membranes/; 4 pages; Membrane Technology. |
| Sulzer; Structured Packings for Separation and Reactive Distillation Brochure; pp. 2-27; 2002-2003. |
| Sweeting et al.; High Surface Reticulated Ceramics for Catalytic Applications; Mat., Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 549; pp. 17-23; 1999. |
| Sweeting et al.; Reticulated Ceramics for Catalyst Support Applications; Hi-Tech Ceramics, Inc.; Nov. 30, 1994; 12 pages. |
| Tan-Atichat and Nagib, “Interaction of free-stream turbulence with screens and grids: a balance between turbulence scales” J. Fluid Mech (1982), vol. 114, pp. 501-528; Great Britain. |
| Wadley; Cellular Metals Manufacutring; Advanced Engineering Materials; 4; No. 10; pp. 726-733; 2002. |
| Woodward et al.; Akzo Chemicals' Guard Bed Technology; 16 pages; 1991. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Mar. 10, 2010; 6 pages; U.S. |
| Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Aug. 20, 2010; 4 pages; U.S. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Nov. 3, 2010; 5 pages; U.S. |
| Applicant; Response to Final Office Action, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jan. 3, 2011; 5 pages; U.S. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jan. 19, 2011; 5 pages; U.S. |
| Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jul. 19, 2011; 4 pages; U.S. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Sep. 22, 2011; 6 pages; U.S. |
| Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Dec. 16, 2011; 5 pages; U.S. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jan. 27, 2012; 7 pages; U.S. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Feb. 3, 2012; 7 pages; U.S. |
| Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Aug. 3, 2012; 6 pages; U.S. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Oct. 23, 2012; 9 pages; U.S. |
| Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Dec. 24, 2012; 8 pages; U.S. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jan. 11, 2013; 3 pages; U.S. |
| Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Feb. 25, 2013; 4 pages; U.S. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated May 2, 2013; 8 pages; U.S. |
| U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit; Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Faulding Inc., 56 USPQ2d 1481 (CA FC 2000); Oct. 25, 2000; 11 pages. |
| Selected relevant excerpts from file history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190, filed Aug. 15, 2007 and assigned to Applicant for present application. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/867,015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,393,510, dated Jul. 1, 2008). |
| New Zealand Intellectual Property Office; Further Examination Report, issued in connection to application No. 743891; dated Jun. 24, 2019; 9 pages; New Zealand. |
| Japanese Patent Office; Observation, issued in connection to JP2018-541647;dated Jun. 19, 2019; 40 pages; Japan. |
| The Japan Petroleum Institute; Petroleum Refining Process; Kodansha Ltd.; May 20, 1998; 6 pages; Japan. |
| Chen, Xiaodong et al.; Improving the Strength of ZTA Foams with Different Strategies: Immersion Infiltration and Recoating; www.mdpi.com/journal/material;; May 30, 2017; 15 pages. |
| Intellectual Property Office of Singapore; Written Opinion, issued in connection to application No. 11201805367W; dated Aug. 16, 2019; 7 pages; Singapore. |
| Intellectual Property Office of Singapore; Written Opinion, issued in connection to application No. 11201805491X; dated Aug. 29, 2019; 6 pages; Singapore. |
| Intellectual Property India; Examination Report, issued in connection to application No. 201837023710; dated Aug. 28, 2019; 6 pages; India. |
| Government of Chile, Ministry of Economy, Promotion and Tourism; Examiner's Report and Search Report, issued in connection to application No. 201801799; dated Aug. 9, 2019; 14 pages; Chile. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Official Action and Examination Search Report, issued in connection with CA3009845; dated Aug. 28, 2019; 4 pages; Canada. |
| Saint-Gobain Norpro; Denstone® Deltrap® Support Media; 6 pages; printed Oct. 1, 2019; https://www.norpro.saint-gobain.com/support-media/denstone-deltap. |
| Saint-Gobain Norpro; Tools Help Optimize Selection of Denstone® Bed Support Media; Apr. 4, 2019; 4 pages; https://www.norpro.saint-gobain.com/articles/tools-help-optimize-selection-denstone-bed-support-media-article. |
| Chilean Patent and Trademark Office; Examiner Report, issued in connection to application No. 2131-2018; 17 pages; dated Aug. 29, 2019; Chile. |
| Chilean Patent and Trademark Office; Search Report, issued in connection to application No. 2131-2018; 3 pages; dated Aug. 29, 2019; Chile. |
| Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2018-541647; dated Aug. 28, 2019; 14 pages; Japan. |
| Australian Government, IP Australia, Examination Report No. 2 for Standard Patent Application, Issued in connection to AU2016381170; 3 pages; dated Nov. 8, 2019; Australia. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190358620 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11136631 | May 2005 | US |
| Child | 12786140 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12786140 | May 2010 | US |
| Child | 16537282 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10396851 | Mar 2003 | US |
| Child | 11136631 | US |
