Separation Methods

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080029455
  • Publication Number
    20080029455
  • Date Filed
    November 08, 2004
    19 years ago
  • Date Published
    February 07, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
A method for chromatographic separation of a molecule, wherein a mobile phase and a charged stationary phase are present and a charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s) is employed to modify the hydrophobic interaction between the molecule and said charged stationary phase.
Description

LIST OF FIGURES

In each of the figures conductivity (mS/cm) and UV absorbance at 280 nm (mAu) of eluted fractions are plotted against time (min).



FIG. 1 shows the results when acetone in aqueous solution is run on a non-derivatised Q-Sepharose anion exchange column. Acetone is not retained on the column.



FIG. 2 shows the results when lysozyme in aqueous solution is run on a non-derivatised Q-Sepharose anion exchange column. Lysozyme is positively charged and is not retained on the positively charged column.



FIG. 3 shows the results when a mixture of acetone and lysozyme in aqueous solution is run on a non-derivatised 0-Sepharose anion exchange column. Neither the acetone, nor the lysozyme is retained on the column.



FIG. 4 shows the results when acetone in aqueous solution is run on a Q-Sepharose anion exchange column derivatised with sulfated beta cyclodextrin. Acetone is not retained on the derivatised column.



FIG. 5 shows the results when lysozyme in aqueous solution is run on a Q-Sepharose anion exchange column derivatised with sulfated beta cyclodextrin. Lysozyme is retained on the derivatised column and is eluted from the column (peak at 13 to 20 minutes) using a salt gradient.



FIG. 6 shows the results when a mixture of acetone and lysozyme in aqueous solution is run on a Q-Sepharose anion exchange column derivatised with sulfated beta cyclodextrin. Acetone is not retained on the column and is eluted from the column in under five minutes. Lysozyme is retained on the derivatised column and is eluted from the column (peak at 13 to 20 minutes) using a salt gradient. Using the derivatised column two UV absorbance peaks are seen confirming that the acetone and lysozyme have been separated on the derivatised column.





EXAMPLES

The following methods are for the purification of basic proteins (high pI). Resin types (charge) would be reversed to separate acidic proteins.


Example 1
Method 1—Separation of a Strongly Hydrophobic Protein

A running buffer (mobile phase) is selected with a pH below the pI of the protein so that the protein carries a positive charge. Purification of the protein is achieved using a negatively charged sugar polymer carboxymethyl beta-cyclodextrin and a positively charged chromatography matrix (anion exchanger). Traditionally it would not be possible to retain a positively charged protein on a positively charged matrix. However, in this method, a solution of a negatively charged sugar polymer is injected through the column prior to introduction of the protein solution. The sugar polymer binds to the chromatography matrix, temporarily derivatising the surface. This derivatised surface is capable of hydrophobic interaction with protein molecules. The protein(s) to be separated are then injected through the column. An elution is performed. The elution method can be an isocratic elution (no salt gradient) in which retention time on the column is determined by the strength of the hydrophobic protein—sugar polymer interactions. A protein separation is achieved, the most hydrophobic protein is eluted last from the column. Thus a separation based on protein hydrophobicity is achieved using an ion-exchange matrix. Alternatively a salt gradient may be used for the elution. The elution may also involve the use of one or more other compounds (e.g. urea, methanol, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, guanidine hydrochloride or acetonitrile) to modulate the hydrophobic interaction of the sugar polymer with protein.


Chromatography Column:


















Type
Strong anion exchanger



Brand
Q sepharose fast flow



Manufacturer
Amersham



Size
1 ml










Running Buffers:


















Tris
100 mM



EDTA
1 mM



pH
8.0



Flow
1 ml/min



Salt gradient
NaCl 0-0.5 M










Target Protein:


















Type
Lysozyme (pl = 11.3)



Concentration
0.5 mg/ml



Inject volume
1 ml










Sugar Polymer:


















Description
Negatively charged, cyclodextrin derivative



Type
Sulfated-beta-cyclodextrin



Conc
4 mg/ml



Inject
25 ml










A 1 ml Q Sepharose anion exchanger was employed to separate the protein lysozyme from acetone in aqueous solution. The process was operated as described in method 1 using a salt gradient to elute the protein and sugar polymer.


Lysozyme has a molecular weight of 14 kDa and an isoelectric point of 11.3. The running buffer used was 100 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA at pH 8.0 (buffer 1). Therefore, both the protein and the chromatography stationary phase were positively charged under the process conditions. Charged molecules bound to the anion exchange resin were removed by elution using a salt gradient. This was performed by mixing buffer 1 with buffer 2 (as buffer 1 plus 1 M NaCl) in gradually increasing ratios of buffer 2.


The column was loaded with 1 ml samples for each of the six runs shown. The samples contained 0.25% v/v acetone, 0.5 mg/ml lysozyme or a mixture of 0.25% v/v acetone, 0.5 mg/ml lysozyme. All samples were dissolved in buffer 1. Each sample was run on the Q Sepharose column with a flow rate of 1 mil/min. The experiments were performed by first running each of the acetone, lysozyme and mixed acetonellysozyme samples individually down the underivatised column. This process was repeated using the same column, but using a derivatisation step to derivatise the column with sulfated-beta-cyclodextrin before running each sample down the column. To derivatise the column the sulphated beta-cyclodextrin was loaded onto the column by injecting 25 ml of buffer 1 containing 4 mg/ml of the sulphated beta-cyclodextrin at a flow rate of 4 ml/min. The sugar polymer used, sulphated beta-cyclodextrin sodium salt (Aldrich, #38,915-3), is negatively charged.


Elution of acetone and lysozyme was monitored continuously by detecting UV absorbance at 280 nm (mAu) of the elute. Lysozyme and acetone absorb UV light at 280 nm. Sulphated beta-cyclodextrin does not absorb UV light at 280 nm sufficiently strongly to affect the UV signals measured. Conductivity was measured in mS/cm. The conductivity of buffer 1 was around 8 mS/cm and of buffer 2 was around 80 mS/cm.


Under normal operation, (i.e. without derivatisation of the anion exchange resin), lysozyme cannot be retained on an anion exchange column as both the column and protein have the same charge. Since the flow rate is 1 ml/mn and the column volume is 1 ml with around 50% voidage, material that cannot bind to the chromatography stationary phase begins to elute approximately 0.5 min after injection (FIG. 2).











TABLE 1







Sepharose anion exchange



Sepharose anion exchange
column - Derivatised with


Sample
column - Non-derivatised
sulphated beta-cyclodextrin







Acetone
No retention (FIG. 1)
No retention (FIG. 4)


Lysozyme
No retention (FIG. 2)
Retained (FIG. 5)


Mixture of
No retention (FIG. 3)
Separated (FIG. 6)


Acetone and


Lysozyme









All three samples run on the underivatised column eluted rapidly without binding to the column (FIGS. 1 to 3). The same process occurred when acetone was injected onto the sulphated beta-cyclodextrin-derivatised column (FIG. 4). Acetone is uncharged and thus does not interact with the anion exchange resin; acetone forms no hydrophobic interaction with cyclodextrin sugar polymer and so elutes without binding to either the non-derivatised or derivatised column.


When the lysozyme sample was injected onto the derivatised column, no increase in UV absorbance was detected in the 0 to 5 minute range, as the protein was retained on the derivatised column (FIG. 5). When a salt gradient was run down the column, the UV absorbance Increased rapidly, indicating that the retained protein was being eluted from the column (FIG. 5).


In the final run, a sample containing a mixture of acetone and lysozyme was found to be separated efficiently on the derivatised column. The acetone passed through the column, but the lysozyme protein was retained until it was eluted from the column using a salt gradient. These results demonstrate that charged amphipathic sugar polymer—protein interactions can be used in ion-exchange chromatography to achieve separation.


Method 2—Separation of a Weakly Hydrophobic Protein

In this method a positively charged amphipathic sugar polymer (e.g. an amino beta-cyclodextrin or an aminoalkyl inulin) and a negatively charged chromatography matrix (cation exchanger) are used. The column is derivatised with a pulse of the positively charged sugar polymer in aqueous solution. A solution containing the positively charged weakly hydrophobic protein is then injected through the column. This method is mixed mode, that is protein—matrix interactions occur through a combination of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. Elution is performed using a gradually increasing salt concentration to screen out the protein—matrix electrostatic interactions. However, since the protein is bound through a combination of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions elution of the more hydrophobic protein will occur at a higher salt concentration. This method is particularly useful for separation of two proteins with very similar charge using an ion exchange matrix.


Chromatography Column:


















Type
Weak cation exchanger



Brand
CM sepharose fast flow



Manufacturer
Amersham



Size
1 ml










Running Buffers:


















Tris
100 mM



EDTA
1 mM



pH
8.0



Flow
1 ml/min



Salt gradient
NaCl 0-0.5 M










Protein:















Type
Lysozyme (pl = 11.3) with



Cytochrome c (pl = 10.6), alpha chymotrypsinogen



(pl = 9.5) or ribonuclease A (pl = 9.6)


Concentration
0.5 mg/ml


Inject volume
1 ml









Sugar Polymer:


















Description
Weakly positively charged, cyclodextrin derivative



Type
6-monodeoxy-6-monoamino-beta-cyclodextrin




hydrochloride



or



Description
Weakly positively charged, inulin derivative



Type
aminopropyl inulin



Conc
4 mg/ml



Inject
25 ml










Method 3

In this method, the hydrophobic interaction between the amphipathic sugar polymer and the positively charged protein of interest is used to decrease binding to the chromatography matrix. The sugar polymer used has a weak negative charge (e.g. carboxymethyl beta-cyclodextrin). A negatively charged chromatography matrix (cation exchanger) is used to ensure that there is little or no binding of the sugar polymer to the matrix. The positively charged protein is passed through the column and binds to the negatively charged matrix. The sugar polymer is now included in the elution buffer and a salt gradient passed through the column. The sugar polymer binds to the most hydrophobic protein with greatest affinity. This reduces the protein net charge and allows the most hydrophobic protein to be eluted at a lower salt concentration than a similarly charged less hydrophobic protein.


Method 4—Optional Step—Removal of Amphipathic Sugar Polymer(s)

Eluent obtained from the ion exchange column is passed through a second column, or column section, containing an immobilised enzyme. The enzyme degrades any sugar polymer that co-elutes with the protein(s) of interest. Sugar polymers are degraded to monomers, e.g. glucose, fructose and/or derivatives thereof. This releases the sugar polymers from the protein molecules and prevents any further modification of the protein properties by the sugar polymer.

Claims
  • 1. A method for chromatographic separation of a molecule, wherein a mobile phase and charged stationary phase are present and a charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s) is employed to modify the hydrophobic interaction between said molecule and said charged stationary phase, and wherein the pH of said mobile phase is below the pI of the molecule (and thus the molecule carries a net positive charge) or the pH of the mobile phase is above the pI of the molecule (and thus the molecule carries a net negative charge).
  • 2-4. (canceled)
  • 5. The method of claim 1 for separating a positively charged molecule from a solution comprising said the molecule and further components by hydrophobic interaction chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising said molecule to a positively charged stationary phase which is non-covalently associated with a negatively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s), and eluting said molecule from said stationary phase in a mobile phase.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 for separating a negatively charged molecule from a solution comprising said he molecule and further components by hydrophobic interaction chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising said molecule to a negatively charged stationary phase which is non-covalently associated with a positively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s), and eluting said molecule from said the stationary phase in a mobile phase.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 for separating a positively charged molecule from a solution comprising said molecule and further components by mixed mode hydrophobic interaction/ion exchange chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising said molecule to a negatively charged stationary phase which is non-covalently associated with a positively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s), and eluting said the molecule from said the stationary phase in a mobile phase.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 for separating a negatively charged molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by mixed mode hydrophobic interaction/ion exchange chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising the molecule to a positively charged stationary phase which is non-covalently associated with a negatively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s), and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the mobile phase comprises an amphipathic sugar polymer(s).
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the mobile phase comprises a charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s).
  • 11. The method of claim 1 for separating a positively charged molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by mixed mode hydrophobic interaction/ion exchange chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising the molecule to a negatively charged stationary phase, and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase comprising a negatively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s).
  • 12. The method of claim 1 for separating a negatively charged molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by mixed mode hydrophobic interaction/ion exchange chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising the molecule to a positively charged stationary phase, and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase comprising a positively charged amphipathic sugar polymer.
  • 13-49. (canceled)
  • 50. A method for separating a molecule from a solution comprising a charged molecule and further components by hydrophobic interaction chromatography comprising applying the solution comprising the molecule to an oppositely charged stationary phase, and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase, characterised in that the stationary phase comprises a charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s).
  • 51. A method for separating a molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by hydrophobic interaction chromatography comprising applying the solution comprising the molecule to a charged stationary phase, and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase, characterised in that: (a) the charged stationary phase is non-covalently associated with a charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s), or the stationary phase comprises a charged amphipathic sugar polymer, and/or(b) the molecule is non-covalently associated with a charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s),
  • 52. A method according to claim 51 for separating a positively charged molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by hydrophobic interaction chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising the molecule to a positively charged stationary phase which is non-covalently associated with a negatively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s), and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase.
  • 53. A method according to claim 51 for separating a negatively charged molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by hydrophobic interaction chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising the molecule to a negatively charged stationary phase which is non-covalently associated with a positively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s), and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase.
  • 54. A method according to claim 51 for separating a positively charged molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by mixed mode hydrophobic interaction/ion exchange chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising the molecule to a negatively charged stationary phase which is non-covalently associated with a positively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s), and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase.
  • 55. A method according to claim 51 for separating a negatively charged molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by mixed mode hydrophobic interaction/ion exchange chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising the molecule to a positively charged stationary phase which is non-covalently associated with a negatively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s), and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase.
  • 56. A method according to claim 51, wherein the mobile phase comprises an amphipathic sugar polymer(s).
  • 57. A method according to claim 51, wherein the mobile phase comprises a charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s).
  • 58. A method according to claim 51 for separating a positively charged molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by mixed mode hydrophobic interaction/ion exchange chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising the molecule to a negatively charged stationary phase, and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase comprising a negatively charged amphipathic sugar polymer(s).
  • 59. A method according to claim 51 for separating a negatively charged molecule from a solution comprising the molecule and further components by mixed mode hydrophobic interaction/ion exchange chromatography comprising applying a solution comprising the molecule to a positively charged stationary phase, and eluting the molecule from the stationary phase in a mobile phase comprising a positively charged amphipathic sugar polymer.
  • 60. A method according to claim 1 or claim 51, wherein the or an amphipathic sugar polymer is selected from the group consiting of a cyclic helical or linear sugar polymer.
  • 61. A method according to claim 1 or claim 51, wherein the or an amphipathic sugar polymer is a cyclodextrin or derivative thereof.
  • 62. A method according to claim 1 or claim 51, wherein the amphipathic sugar polymer is an inulin or a derivative thereof.
  • 63. A method according to claim 1 or claim 51, wherein the amphipatic sugar polymer is an inulin derivative is substituted with one or more charged group selected from the group consisting of: a sulfonyl group, sulfonylalkyl group, a phosphonyl group, a phosphonylalkyl group, a carboxyl group, a carboxyalkyl group, an alkyl-succinyl group, a quaternary ammonium group, an aminoalkyl group, an amino group, an alkylamino group and a dialkylamino group
  • 64. A method according to claim 1 or claim 51 further comprising removal of amphipathic sugar polymer(s) from the eluate.
  • 65. A method according to claim 1 or claim 51, wherein the molecule for separation is a protein or a nucleic acid. _
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0326064.3 Nov 2003 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/GB04/50024 11/8/2004 WO 00 4/9/2007