The present invention concerns a separation unit for separating a perforated web material such as paper towels, tissue paper or nonwoven material along the perforation lines.
The present invention further relates to a dispenser for a web material, comprising a housing defining a web material reservoir, a dispensing opening, a control unit, and said separation unit.
Automatic touchfree dispensers (or “hands-free dispensers”) for paper towels are known on the market. The hands-free dispensers are electronically manoeuvred, they store and advance the paper towel with different kinds of control devices, sensors and power sources available. Without touching the dispenser, the user can get a paper towel that is fed automatically by the electronic dispenser. Dispensers like this are commonly used in public lavatories for dispensing paper towels to users. The most common type of a powered, hands-free dispenser is a roll dispenser that users sensors to initiate the mechanisms for advancing the towel such that the subsequent sheet is presented to the user.
Rolls of paper towels are often heavy and there is a friction and resistance for unrolling the paper. Especially when the roll is accelerated there is a high demand of energy. Consequently, there is a need for a strong paper in order to withstand the force necessary to make a full heavy roll to start rotating. A strong paper usually has drawbacks in that the softness of the paper is low. In addition, hands-free dispensers for rolled paper towels demand a large amount of space due to the relatively large volume of the heavy paper rolls.
As an alternative to rolls of paper towels, US2011/0101020, WO 2011/045493, EP 1 830 687 all disclose dispensing units comprising a housing for holding a pile of a continuous length of accordion-like folded web of towels. The dispenser comprises an access opening to the pile, a dispensing opening for the web of towels, a feeding mechanism comprising a member for controlling the dispensing of the web of towels, and a drive unit. Bundles of paper towels with connecting means therebetween are insertable through the access opening into the housing in the dispensing unit and may be added to the bottom of the pile. The web of towels is dispensable from the upper part of the pile by the feeding mechanism, which positions the web of towels in a starting mode in the dispensing opening. This solution enables feeding of a large amount of wipe products while avoiding the problems relating to the weight of a heavy paper roll or large pile. Preferably, the folded web material comprises a double folded perforated web material, where two perforated webs are interfolded, such that the perforations are arranged in an off-set relationship to each other. A separation unit enables the wipe products to be separated at the lines of weakness when the web is pulled by the user. This feature will allow the feeding of the products to be performed manually by the user, hence avoiding any additional arrangements of the dispensers such as electrical power.
However, to realize the dispenser as described above a number of problems must be solved, including separating the webs correctly along the perforation lines, feeding the next portion of the web to be separated to the separation unit, and presenting the leading end of the web to the next user. Furthermore, separation shall be possible for different types of web materials and web materials having different lengths between the perforation lines.
GB 2 433 248 describes a dispenser for feeding a rolled material comprising two perforated webs, wherein the perforations are in offset relationship. The dispenser comprises two profiled rollers being arranged to form a non-linear nip, applying pressure to the sheet material so that the lines of weakness of the web material would burst. The nip is formed by protrusion elements of different sizes arranged on two rollers. It is shown that the surfaces of each pair of opposing protrusion elements are always in contact with each other.
WO 2011/1149393 describes a dispenser for feeding a rolled tissue or nonwoven material, which may be provided with perforations. A problem with perforated webs is defined, relating to the fact that the web tends to break at every perforation, but that the user might sometimes wish to use a long section of web and sometimes a short section of web. For feeding the web in the dispenser, there is provided a drive roller and an engaging roller. The drive roller and the engaging roller are arranged such that an undulated passage is defined between the protrusion elements on the rollers. It is stated that the undulated passage ensures that the dispensing end of the web is in contact with both the drive roller and the engaging roller in the passage. Also, a pulling force exerted substantially straight out from the dispensing passage is distributed evenly over a central portion of the web, which results in that the web will not break even if perforated, until the user chooses to apply a force sideways. The separation is thus done by the user rather than by the dispenser itself.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a separation unit eliminating the above-mentioned problems.
According to the present invention, a separation unit for separating a web material along preformed lines of weakness is provided. The separation unit has a width direction and comprises at least a first roller having a rotational axis extending in the width direction and a web width extending in said width direction, and at least a second roller having a rotational axis extending parallel with said rotational axis of said first roller and a web width extending in said width direction. A web width of a roller is a portion of the roller extending along the width direction of the roller. Over the web width of the roller the web material is arranged to pass during dispensing of the web material. The second roller is positioned at a distance from the first roller. The distance between the rollers extends in a direction perpendicular to the width direction. The rollers are thus positioned such that the rotational axes are juxtaposed. The separation unit may comprise more than two rollers, positioned at a distance from each other, wherein the distance between the rollers extends in a direction perpendicular to the width direction.
Each of said rollers is provided with at least one protrusion element extending radially perpendicular from said axes. Each of said protrusion elements has a maximum width in said width direction, a maximum radial extension from said rotational axes, an inner portion adjacent to said rotational axes, and an outer portion remote from said rotational axes. By “maximum width” is meant the maximal extension of the protrusion element in the width direction. By “maximum radial extension” is meant the distance from the rotational axis of the roller to the most remote point on the protrusion element in the radial direction being perpendicular to the width direction of the rotational axis.
It is of course conceivable to provide at least one of the rollers with a plurality of protrusion elements being spaced along said rotational axes and protruding perpendicularly from said axes.
The outer portions of the protrusion elements on said first roller are arranged in a staggered relationship with the outer portions of the protrusion elements on the second roller. In other words, the rollers and the protrusion elements are placed such that the protrusion elements on the first roller are positioned in between the protrusion elements on the second roller. Further, the outer portions of the protrusion elements on said first roller are partially overlapping with said outer portions of said protrusion elements on said second roller along an imaginary line extending in a width direction, whereby an undulating passage for a web material is formed between said rollers such that the shape of the passage for a web material formed between the protrusion elements is meandering along the imaginary line. The overlap between the protrusion elements has a radial overlap length between 2-40 mm, preferably 2-20 mm, more preferably 3-12 mm, or most preferably between 4-10 mm. Surprisingly, it has been found that when the radial overlap length is in the range mentioned above, preformed lines of weakness are correctly and easily broken, thus allowing an accurate and smooth separation of the web material. Without wishing to be bound by a theory, the inventor believes that this effect is achieved due to the “wrinkling” of the web material in the passage. This wrinkling causes local tension in the web material, which causes the material to burst as the preformed lines of weakness pass through the undulating passage. It is worth noting that the pinch force exercised by the separation unit of the present invention is strong enough to break the preformed lines of weakness, and at the same time weak enough not to damage the web material. Such an optimization of the pinch force is achieved due to the unique geometry of the separation unit.
Thus, by using the separation unit according to the present invention, the risk that any given preformed line of weakness would break before that particular line of weakness has reached the separation unit is eliminated. At the same time, the separation unit according to the present invention facilitates the separation of the web material such that the force needed for separation of the web material is minimized.
The ratio between the radial overlap length and the maximum radial extension of the protrusion elements may be between 4-80%, preferably 15-60%.
The web material mentioned above may in the context of the present invention be tissue paper, such as facial tissue, toilet tissue or paper towels, or may be nonwoven material. As would be understood by the person skilled in the art, the pinch force needed for accurate separation of the web material may need to be altered depending on the type of the web material. In order to provide the separation unit according to the present invention being usable with different types of web material, the distance between the rotational axes of the first and second rollers may be adjustable, thus enabling the radial overlap length in the undulating passage to be variable. This feature of the separation unit makes it very flexible and adaptive.
The protrusion elements of the separation unit according to the present invention may be of any suitable shape, as far as the radial overlap length is within the range specified above. Thus, the protrusion elements may be in the form of disc elements, propeller-shaped elements, cylinder elements or the like. The cross-section in a radial plane of the protrusion elements may be rounded at the outer periphery of the protrusion element. The cross-section at the outer periphery of the protrusion element may also be rectangular, triangular, wavy or the like. The maximum radial extensions of said protrusion elements may be between 5-50 mm, preferably 5-30 mm, more preferably 10-20 mm, or most preferably 12-18 mm.
The protrusion elements may be made of any suitable material that provides friction between the outer portion of the protrusion element and the web material. Thus, the protrusion elements may be made of rubber or another elastomeric material.
The protrusion elements may be covered by a sleeve or ring of an elastomeric material encircling the outer periphery of each individual protrusion element. The elastomeric material may be glued, vulcanized or simply stretched around the outer portion of the protrusion element.
The maximum widths of said protrusion elements may be between 4-20 mm, preferably 5-10 mm, most preferably 6-8 mm. As mentioned above, the maximum width of each protrusion element is determined by the dimension of the widest part of the protrusion element. The width of the protrusion element may be same or different along the radial direction. Thus, if the width of the protrusion element is the same along the radial direction, the maximum width within the overlap length is equal to the maximum width of the protrusion element. On the other hand, if the width of the protrusion element is different along the radial direction, the maximum width within the overlap length may be smaller or greater than the maximum width of the protrusion element.
The maximum radial extensions of the protrusion elements may be equal to or greater than the maximum widths of said protrusion elements. The more the difference between the maximum radial extensions and the maximum widths of the protrusion elements, the greater the undulation amplitude of the passage formed between the protrusion elements. This, in turn, means that with increasing undulation amplitude the pinch force increases.
Another advantageous feature of the separation unit according to the present invention is that for at least one of the rollers, the sum of the maximum widths within the overlap length of all protrusion elements on that roller is between 5-30%, preferably between 12-20% of the web width of that roller. By “maximum width within the overlap length” is meant the maximal extension of the protrusion element in the width direction within the overlap length. Thus, the surface of the web material being in contact with the protrusion elements is relatively small compared to the separation units of the prior art, which optimizes the pinch force acting on the web material and provides an accurate separation.
The separation unit according to the present invention may be formed such that the protrusion elements are formed integral with the rollers, or such that the protrusion elements are separate units attached to the roller.
The spacing of the protrusion elements may be the same along the width direction of the first and/or said second roller. Also, the spacing of the protrusion elements may vary along the width direction of the first and/or said second roller. For instance, one of said first and said second rollers may comprise at least a first, a second and a third protrusion element, wherein the spacing between said first and said second protrusion elements along the width direction of said first and/or said second roller differs from the spacing between said second and said third protrusion elements along the width direction of said first and/or said second roller. The protrusion elements may be sparsely arranged in the central portion of the rollers, and concentrated in the peripheral portions of the rollers. If such an arrangement is used, a wrinkleless portion of the web material in the central portion of the roller may be more suitable for gripping by the user when the web material is to be separated.
As mentioned above, the distance between the rotational axes of the first and second rollers may be adjustable, thus enabling the radial overlap length in the undulating passage to be variable. Thus, the rollers may be arranged such that the distance between the rollers is manually changed depending on the type of the web material. Another alternative is that the distance between the rollers is automatically adjustable to provide an optimal separation. Such an automatic adjustment may be enabled by using rollers arranged with a biasing means. The biasing means may be a spring suspension, or suspension acting by gravity. Biasing means facilitate pulling the material through the separation unit when the dispenser is being loaded with a web material. Also, biasing means provides a flexible separation unit enabling a smooth passage of parts of the web material having thickness greater than the web material itself. Such parts may for instance be joints between two bundles of the web material. The distance between said rotational axes of said first and said second rollers may be between 8-100 mm. As will be understood by the person skilled in the art, the distance between the rotational axes may be chosen such that an undulating passage providing an optimal pinch force is formed depending on the type of the web material.
The separation unit according to the present invention may comprise protrusion elements having the same maximum radial extensions and same maximum widths. In other words, all the protrusion elements may be equally sized. The separation unit according to the present invention may comprise protrusion elements having different maximum radial extensions and/or different maximum widths, i.e. the separation unit comprises protrusion elements of different sizes. Thus, a plurality of radial overlaps having different lengths will be formed for every given distance between the rotational axes. In this case, it is essential that the lengths of the radial overlaps formed between each two adjacent protrusion elements are in the range mentioned above.
It has been found that the performance of the separation unit according to the present invention is improved when the spacing between each two protrusion elements is equal to or greater than the maximum width of each protrusion element. Such a relationship between the spacing between the protrusion elements and the maximum widths of the protrusion elements provides for a scarce distribution of the protrusion elements along the rotational axes, which optimizes the pinch force affecting the web material, and facilitates separation of the web material at the desired position.
The separation unit according to the present invention may comprise protrusion elements wherein the maximum radial extensions of the protrusion elements are equal to or greater than said maximum widths of said protrusion elements. This means that the protrusion elements may be relatively large and thin, which contributes to an optimal pinch force of the web material.
The separation unit according to the present invention may be placed in a dispenser. Such a dispenser may comprise a housing defining a web material reservoir, a dispensing opening, a control unit for determining a correct tension and path of the web material, and a separation unit according to the present invention. The dispenser may further comprise a web material contained inside the housing. The web material comprises preformed lines of weakness and may be Z-folded to form a stack, or being in the form of a roll.
A leading portion of the web material is configured to be supported in a dispensing path from the reservoir to the dispensing opening. The leading portion may extend upwardly from the top of the said stack of said web material, or from the peripheral or central part of the roll.
The preformed lines of weakness may be perforation lines formed by alternating bonds and slots and having the perforation strength between 20-80 N/m, preferably 30-45 N/m measured using SS-EN ISO 12625-4:2005. This perforation strength may for instance be achieved by using perforation lines wherein the total bond length/(the total bond length+total slot length) is between 4% and 10%. It is desired to form perforation lines which are strong enough to enable feeding of the web material, but which are also weak enough to enable separation of the sheets along the perforation lines using the separation unit of the present invention. In this context, it is known that also other parameters may influence the strength of the perforation line, such as the paper quality, and the size, shape and distribution of the slots and bonds. However, it is believed that the above-mentioned measure is useful for guiding the person skilled in the art when selecting suitable perforation lines.
The web material may be a two-layer structure, i.e. the web material may comprise at least a first web layer divided into sheet products defined between longitudinally separated preformed lines of weakness extending across the first layer; and at least a second web layer divided into sheet products defined between longitudinally separated lines of weakness extending across the second web layer. The web layers may be interfolded so that the lines of weakness of the first web layer are offset from the lines of weakness of the second web layer in a longitudinal direction.
Further, the dispenser may comprise a feeding mechanism, i.e. a motor to advance a web through the dispenser.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:
In the embodiment shown in
As may be seen in
Another advantageous feature of the separation unit according to the present invention is that the maximum radial extensions r of the protrusion elements are equal to or greater than the maximum widths w of the protrusion elements. As may be seen in
As previously mentioned, the protrusion elements 4 may have different maximum widths w and maximum radial extension r. In
As mentioned above, the shape of the outer portions 5 of the protrusion elements 4 may vary. In
The unit subsequent to the guiding element 14 is separation unit 1 described above. The separation unit 1 provides an optimal pinch force acting on the web material 16, and allows the web material 16 to be separated at the desired position. The separation unit 1 depicted in
The dispenser 7 illustrated in
In
It should be noted that the dispenser 7 according to the present invention may be any type of automatic or non-automatic dispenser for dispensing at least one web, i.e. a plurality of webs may be dispensed simultaneously, or a plurality of different webs may be dispensed by the dispenser 7 one at a time.
The dispenser 7 is a free-standing, but the dispenser may also be mounted on any suitable object in any suitable manner. Furthermore, a dispenser housing 10 of a dispenser according to the present invention need not necessarily contain an entire web 16 that is to be dispensed by the dispenser 7. At least one web 16 may for example be stored outside the housing 10 and merely be fed through the housing 10 when the dispenser 7 is in use.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to various embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognise that changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. It is intended that the detailed description be regarded as illustrative and that the appended claims including all the equivalents are intended to define the scope of the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2012/051158 | 10/26/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/065729 | 5/1/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
804307 | Fonda | Nov 1905 | A |
2886226 | Batlas et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
2809082 | Marcuse | Oct 1957 | A |
2974839 | Batlas et al. | Jul 1958 | A |
3826548 | Schnyder et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3877576 | Kishi et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4089378 | Suzuki | May 1978 | A |
4288068 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4494747 | Graef et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4516711 | Barege | May 1985 | A |
4614632 | Kezuka et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4779861 | Ozawa et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4861013 | Shibata et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5033620 | De Luca | Jul 1991 | A |
5061232 | Bloch et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5098078 | Nakanishi | Mar 1992 | A |
5152522 | Yamashita | Oct 1992 | A |
5205454 | Schutz et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5372359 | Miura et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375785 | Boone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5653439 | Rider | Aug 1997 | A |
5882004 | Padget | Mar 1999 | A |
5975518 | Wakana et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6070867 | Tsurumi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6186490 | Sugiura et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213346 | Skerrett et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6311819 | Stromme et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6520408 | Force et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6655679 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6736466 | Helland et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
7144006 | Graef et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7191657 | Maier et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7472802 | Van Riel | Jan 2009 | B2 |
8899508 | Hjort et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20010020626 | Skerrett et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020033405 | Gergek | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030110915 | Kapiloff et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121970 | Force et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050275153 | Owa | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070010389 | Cutrona et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070236110 | Kling | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080121649 | Kistner | May 2008 | A1 |
20100258579 | Billman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110089213 | Granger | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101020 | Granger | May 2011 | A1 |
20110210137 | Kling | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120193463 | Newhouse | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120211509 | Granger | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130105614 | Hjort et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130277492 | Granger | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150282679 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150282680 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150297042 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2527209 | Dec 2002 | CN |
101080188 | Nov 2007 | CN |
102395307 | Mar 2012 | CN |
202173351 | Mar 2012 | CN |
0 236 709 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0 392 696 | Oct 1990 | EP |
853 284 | Mar 1940 | FR |
2 433 248 | Jun 2007 | GB |
2011-194125 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2004056250 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2006071148 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2007000153 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008009760 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008078168 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2011045493 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO 2011149393 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012003867 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012076776 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013184049 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Demand (Form PCT/IPEA/401) dated Mar. 11, 2014, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Preliminary Examining Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051158. (7 pages). |
PCT Demand (Form PCT/IPEA/401) dated Mar. 31, 2014, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Preliminary Examining Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2013/050204. (15 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report (Forms PCT/ISA/220 and PCT/ISA 210) and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Form PCT/ISA/237) dated Jul. 8, 2013, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051160. (10 pages). |
An English Translation of the Office Action (Decision on Grant) dated Apr. 28, 2016, by the Federal Service for Intellectual Property Office in corresponding Russian Patent Application No. 2015119664/12. (6 pages). |
The extended European Search Report dated May 6, 2016, by the European Patent Office in corresponding European Patent Application No. 12887301.5-1601. (8 pages). |
The extended European Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2016, by the European Patent Office in European Patent Application No. 13848737.6-1601. (8 pages). |
The extended European Search Report dated May 6, 2016, by the European Patent Office in European Patent Application No. 12887211.6-1601. (9 pages). |
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) dated Jul. 1, 2013, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051158. |
Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) dated Jul. 1, 2013, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051158. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (PCT/IPEA/409) dated Jan. 29, 2015, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Preliminary Examining Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051158. |
Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority (PCT/IPEA/408) dated Nov. 10, 2014, by the Swedish Patent Office as the International Preliminary Examining Authority for International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051158. |
English language translation of Office Action/Search Report dated May 17, 2016, by the Russian Patent Office in aorresponding Russian Patent Application No. 2015119242. (9 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Form PCT/IPEA/409) dated Oct. 1, 2014, by the Swedish Patent Office in corresponding International Application No. PCT/SE2013/050204. (9 pages). |
International Search Report (Form PCT/ISA/210) and the Written Opinion (Form PCT/ISA/237) dated Dec. 2, 2013, by the Swedish Patent Office acting as the International Searching Authority in corresponding International Application No. PCT/SE2013/050204. (10 pages). |
Office Action (Notification of the second Office Action) dated Apr. 10, 2017, by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280076596.2, and an English Translation of the Office Action. (21 pages). |
Office Action (Notification of the second Office Action) dated May 10, 2017, by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201280076557.2, and an English Translation of the Office Action. (20 pages). |
Office Action (Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC) dated Oct. 2, 2017, by the European Patent Office in corresponding European Patent Application No. 12 887 301.5-1601. (5 pages). |
Office Action (Notification of the third Office Action) dated Aug. 21, 2017, by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China in the Chinese Patent Application No. 201280076596.2, and an English Translation of the Office Action. (21 pages). |
Office Action (Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC) dated Sep. 4, 2017, by the European Patent Office in the European Patent Application No. 12 887 211.6-1601. (5 pages). |
Office Action (Notification of the First Office Action) dated Sep. 19, 2016, by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280076556.8, and an English Translation of the Office Action. (9 pages). |
Office Action (Notification of the First Office Action) dated Sep. 20, 2016, by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280076596.2, and an English Translation of the Office Action. (19 pages). |
The extended European Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2016, by the European Patent Office in European Patent Application No. 12886996.3-1601. (7 pages). |
European Patent Office dated Aug. 22, 2014. (4 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Forms PCT/IPEA/416 and PCT/IPEA/409) dated Jan. 16, 2015, by the European Patent Office in the International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051164. (7 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/ISA/220, PCT/ISA/210 and PCT/ISA/237) dated Jun. 18, 2013, by the Swedish Patent Office in the International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051164. (12 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority (Form PCT/IPEA/408) dated Oct. 22, 2014, by the European Patent Office in the International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051164. (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150282678 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |