Patent Application
20130293398
Many electronic devices and equipments utilize keyboards or keypads to take user input. On each of these keypads, many keys are provided to be pressed down or touched upon to generate signals for processing.
On a keypad, a key is either bigger than the average size of a finger tip, or the distance between keys are longer than that of a finger. This is to avoid the “fat” finger phenomenon, i.e. when a key is pressed, the neighboring keys maybe pressed too due to the big size of a finger. However, on a regular sized keyboard, “fat” finger phenomenon may still occur because some fingers are much bigger than the average. Such size issues have limited the number of keys that can be put on a small device, such as a TV remote control, or a hand held phone set. As the TV set-top boxes are becoming more computer powered, and phones enable text communication, more keys are desired to be put on the small keypad.
On smaller hand-held devices and mini-sized keyboards, resistance has been added to the keys so that bigger forces are needed to press down a key. This is to prevent unintended key hits from random sources, but caused discomfort and may cause injuries for fingers with frequent use.
Another class of devices are the infrared touch screens and touchless keypads. This type of input devices utilizing crossing light beams as finger position detectors. When a pair of crossing light beams are blocked, a key triggering signal is generated. However, since such designs usually put keys in a unilocular area, keys may also be unintentionally triggered by the movement of the fingers over other keys, even if each key can take a big area. Input speed is usually very slow to avoid such unintended triggering for such devices.
In accordance with one embodiment, some raised parts, called separation walls, can be established on the keypads so that when a key is hit, its neighboring keys can avoid being hit accidentally.
Accordingly several advantages of one or more aspects are as follows: more keys can be placed on a unit area of space; keys can take less force to press; movement of fingers will not trigger unintended keys. Other advantages of one or more aspects will be apparent from a consideration of the drawings and ensuing description.
One embodiment of the keypad is illustrated in
In this embodiment, the height of the keys and the separation walls don't need to be the same. But the keys need to be below the top surface of the separation walls to trigger a key entry signal. Any sticks that are thinner than the dimension of the keys can also be used to press down the keys.
Another embodiment of the keypad is illustrated in
In this embodiment, the height of the keys don't have to be the same as the enclosure surface. They can be slightly above, at the same height, or slightly below the enclosure surface as long as the triggering position of a key is lower than the top surface of the separation wall. The force needed to press down a key can be very light as the enclosure surface 0 forms a natural protection of the keys from accidental triggering.
A stick that can fit into the cavity size easily can be used to press the keys efficiently.
Another embodiment of the keypad is illustrated in
Another embodiment of the keypad is illustrated in
Surrounding each key area are separation walls 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 that have slits 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 to let enough light beams pass through. These walls are high enough so that only when a finger tip or a stick is put deep enough inside the cell, can a light beam be blocked. Such walls are effective to prevent crossing light beams from being hit unintentionally by moving or fat fingers.
From the description above, a number of advantages of some embodiments of my separation walls for keypad keys become evident:
(a) Because the separation walls can prevent neighboring keys from being unintentionally affected, the keys can be made small so that more keys can be placed in a unit area.
(b) Because the separation walls provide protections to the keys, the force needed to trigger a key can be reduced to be very small.
(c) In the case of the input devices utilizing light beams, the separation walls with slits not only can prevent unintended key hits, but also provide a tactile feedback that can enable the usage of multiple fingers and increase the input speed.
Accordingly, the reader will see that the keypads with separation walls of the various embodiments can be used to reduce the size of the keys, increase the number of keys on a unit area, reduce the forces needed to trigger a key, and to increase the input speed.
Although the description above contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments but as merely providing illustrations of some of the embodiments. For example, the separation walls can have other shapes such as rounded corners and be more fit to finger tips, or made of soft materials that makes touching comfortable, or have different colors from the enclosure surface to be conspicuos.
Thus the scope of the embodiments should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.
