Patent Grant
7931981
Alkaline electrochemical cells are typically configured as elongated cylindrical cells (e.g., AA-, AAA-, C- and D-size cells) or as flat cells (e.g., prismatic cells and button cells). Primary alkaline cells include a negative electrode (anode), a positive electrode (cathode), an electrolyte, a separator, a positive current collector and a negative current collector. The cathode of a conventional primary alkaline electrochemical cell comprises manganese dioxide (MnO2) and a conducting carbonaceous material, typically graphite, such as synthetic, natural, or expanded graphite or mixtures thereof as widely recognized in the art in a mixture wetted with an aqueous alkaline electrolyte such as potassium hydroxide. In cylindrical cells, the cathode mixture is compressed into annular rings and stacked in the battery can or the mixture may be extruded directly into the can, which serves as the positive current collector.
The anode of a primary alkaline cell generally comprises zinc or zinc alloy particles of various dimensions and shapes disposed in an alkaline electrolyte, such as potassium hydroxide, along with gelling agents such as carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and other additives such as surfactants. A negative current collector, usually a brass pin or nail, is placed in electrical contact with the gelled anode. A separator placed between the electrodes enables ions, but not electrons, to transfer between the cathode and anode while preventing the materials from directly contacting each other and creating an electrical short circuit. Conventionally, the separator is a porous, non-woven, fibrous material wetted with electrolyte. The separator is typically disposed radially inwardly of the cathode. Other aspects of a conventional alkaline cell are well known.
With the successful commercialization of these primary cells in the marketplace, new approaches to designing cells with long service life, acceptable shelf life, and voltage characteristics that operate common portable devices continue to be developed.
However, the low density of the manganese dioxide material and its consumption of water during the discharge reaction of conventional zinc manganese dioxide alkaline electrochemical cells (requiring the designer to provide the necessary water) limits the amount of space available for the zinc anode (which determines the service life), thereby leading to relatively low volumetric energy density. A recognized alternative cathode material is copper oxide, which has a high material density, does not consume water in the electron discharge reaction, has a flat discharge curve, high volumetric energy density, and little volume expansion upon discharge. Although it appears to be an excellent candidate for a long service life battery, the operating voltage of conventional batteries having a zinc anode and a copper oxide cathode is unfortunately no more than approximately 1.05V, too low to operate modern day electronic devices at reasonable current drains. At any substantial device current drain, it can fall significantly below 1V, rendering the device largely inoperable.
The use of sulfur compounds to enhance the operating voltage of a battery having a CuO cathode is known. However, it is recognized in the art that soluble sulfur species produced in the presence of alkaline electrolyte are detrimental to both anode performance and shelf life. The commercial application is therefore limited.
Additionally, recent approaches disclose using expanded graphite and/or graphitic nano-fibers with CuO to produce a cell having long service life. However the operating voltage in such systems is typically around 0.7V. Notably many of the prior approaches fail to mention soluble copper species that can be detrimental to the anode, provide no means for mitigating the problem, and fail to recognize the significance of surface area of CuO particles or of active sites on the particles on the cell discharge voltage and performance. Therefore, the disclosed technology does not produce a viable battery with reasonable shelf life.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, an electrochemical cell is provided having an anode, a cathode including a cathode active material, and at least one layer of a separator between the anode and the cathode. An alkaline aqueous bulk electrolyte is in fluid communication with the anode and the cathode, substantially all of the fluid communication being through the separator. The separator has an Exclusion Value of at least 50%.
In accordance with another aspect, an electrochemical cell is provided including an anode with anode active material. A cathode is provided including cathode active material and at least one anode-fouling soluble species. At least one layer of a separator is between the cathode and the anode. An alkaline aqueous bulk electrolyte is in fluid communication with the anode and the cathode. Substantially all of the fluid communication is through the separator. The separator is adapted to effectively limit migration of the at least one anode-fouling soluble species through the separator from the cathode to the anode.
In accordance with yet another aspect, a prolate cylindrical electrochemical cell has an anode, a cathode and a separator situated therebetween. A bulk alkaline aqueous electrolyte is in fluid communication with the anode and the cathode, and a soluble species in the cathode. Substantially all of the fluid communication is through the separator. The separator effectively limits migration of anode-fouling soluble species through the separator from the cathode to the anode.
In accordance with still another aspect, an electrochemical cell is provided including a zinc anode, and a cathode including an oxide of copper and CuS. A separator is situated between the anode and the cathode. An alkaline aqueous electrolyte is in fluid communication with the anode and the cathode. The separator 1) includes a polyvinyl alcohol film, and 2) is configured to effectively limit soluble copper species and soluble sulfur species from migrating to the anode.
In accordance with a version of the present invention, a separator is provided for use in an electrochemical cell. The separator includes a polymer film having opposing sides, the polymer film having the ability to effectively limit the migration of soluble copper species from one side of the polymer film to the other side of the polymer film.
In accordance with another version, a separator is provided for use in an electrochemical cell. The separator includes a polymer film having opposing sides, the polymer film having the ability to effectively limit the migration of soluble sulfur species from one side of the polymer film to the other side of the polymer film.
In accordance with still another version, a separator is provided for use in an electrochemical cell. The separator includes a polymer film having opposing sides, the polymer film having the ability to effectively limit the migration of soluble copper species, soluble silver species and soluble sulfur species from one side of the polymer film to the other side of the polymer film.
Other aspects and advantages will become apparent, and a fuller appreciation of specific adaptations, compositional variations, and physical attributes will be gained upon an examination of the following detailed description of the various embodiments, taken in conjunction with the appended claims.
The present invention relates to an alkaline electrochemical cell and to its component parts. A representative conventional cylindrical cell is illustrated in
At least one or more cylindrical annular cathode rings 24, formed such that their outside diameters at their outer peripheral sidewalls are slightly greater than the inside diameter of the positive current collector 20, are forced into the positive current collector. A coating 22, desirably carbon, can be applied to the radially inner surface of container 20 to enhance the electrical contact between the cathode rings 24 and the container. Installation of the cathode rings 24 forms a pressure contact with coating 22. Cathode 24 further presents an inner surface 27 that define a centrally shaped void 28 in a cylindrical cell within which anode 26 is disposed.
A separator 32 is disposed between the anode 26 and cathode 24. Anode 26, which is placed inside of the cathode rings 24, is generally cylindrically shaped, and has an outer peripheral surface which engages the inner surfaces of a separator 32, and comprises gelled zinc in accordance with at least one aspect of the present invention. The separator is disposed adjacent inner wall 27 between the cathode 24 and anode 26. An alkaline aqueous electrolyte typically comprising potassium hydroxide and water at least partially wets anode 26, cathode rings 24, and separator 32.
A bead 30 is rolled into the container near the negative end 41 to support a sealing disk 34. The sealing disk 34, having a negative current collector 36 extending there-through, is placed into the open end of the container 20 and in contact with the bead 30. The negative open end 41 of the container 20 is crimped over the sealing disk 34 thus compressing it between the crimp and the bead 30 to close and seal the cell. An insulation washer 38 with a central aperture is placed over the crimped end of the cell such that the end of the negative current collector 36 protrudes through the aperture. A contact spring 40 is affixed to the end of the negative current collector 36. Negative terminal cap 42 and positive terminal cap 44 are placed into contact with the contact spring 40 and the positive current collector 20, respectively, and an insulating tube 46 and steel shell 48 can be placed around the cell 18 and crimped on their ends to hold the terminal caps in place. It should be appreciated that steel shell 48 and insulating tube 46 could be eliminated to increase the internal volume for the cell that may be occupied by active ingredients. Such an arrangement is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,419 assigned to Rayovac Corporation, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein for the purposes of background information.
In a broad embodiment, a cell of the invention includes a cathode that comprises an oxide of copper as a cathode active material. A suitable oxide that comprises copper is copper (II) oxide or a mixed oxide compound that comprises copper and at least one other metal, where the other metal(s) has a reducible oxidation state. Such a cathode can comprise a physical mixture of the two, or a chemically synthesized complex oxide of the two or more elements. The invention can also relate to other components of the cathode, and of the anode, the separator, and the electrolyte, which components can be combined as desired to produce a cell having improved discharge and service life characteristics in accordance with the invention. Other aspects of the cell of the invention not specifically described herein can be conventional.
The invention also relates to methods for making and using a cathode, an anode, electrolyte, separator/barrier, separator/barrier seal, and alkaline electrochemical cell.
Cathode Materials and Designs
Focusing first on the cathode, one aspect of the present invention recognizes that copper oxide is known as a high capacity (e.g., about 337 mA/g for 1 electron reduction and 674 mAh/g for a 2-electron reduction) cathode material with the potential to significantly increase service life compared to present day commercially available alkaline cells. However, several issues typically minimize the likelihood that one of skill would include copper oxide as cathode material for conventional Zn gelled anode alkaline cells. One issue arises as a result of the operating voltage of the copper oxide being too low for applications requiring open circuit voltages above 1.1V or closed circuit voltage above 1.0V at reasonable current drains. Various versions of the present invention enable the operating voltage increase of a copper oxide containing cell.
Another issue is the solubility of copper from the copper-containing cathode in alkaline electrolytes. In particular, the soluble species from these materials can be detrimental to the storage and discharge of the gelled zinc anode of alkaline cells if allowed to migrate past the separator to the anode. Various aspects of the present invention disclose ways to mitigate and/or manage this problem and provide batteries with improved service life and shelf life. Similar issues arise with silver, nickel, iodate, and/or sulfur-containing cathode materials.
Various versions of the present invention provide physical and chemical approaches to increasing the operating discharge voltage of a cell that comprises an oxide of a metal, and in particular an oxide of copper, in the cathode to a level greater than that of CuO alone. Without intending to be limited to a theory of the invention, it is believed that thermodynamic and kinetic considerations support the disclosed approach. The operating voltage of the cathode can be increased by supplementing the CuO with at least one additional cathode active material that has an operating voltage higher than CuO, for example EMD, CMD, NiO, NiOOH, Cu(OH)2, Cobalt Oxide, PbO2, AgO, Ag2O, AgCuO2, Cu2Mn2O4, Cu2Ag2O4, and Cu2Ag2O3. The combination of CuO and the additive(s) therefore also has an operating voltage higher than CuO.
Alternatively, the discharge voltage of the cathode can be increased by supplementing the CuO with at least one additive having a discharge voltage that is lower than the discharge voltage of CuO. When a suitable additive is combined with CuO, however, the combination has a higher discharge voltage than either the additive or the CuO alone. The open circuit and discharge voltages of the CuO, the additive, and the combination of the CuO and the additive can, of course, be determined experimentally by one skilled in the art. Alternatively, the present inventors recognize that a suitable additive can be selected by screening multiple candidate materials without experimentation by first estimating the change in Gibbs' Free Energy of a combination versus zinc, and hence the open circuit voltage of the reduction reaction utilizing the Gibbs Free Energy equation. In particular, a suitable additive can be identified when the change in Gibbs Free Energy of the reduction reaction of the combination versus zinc is higher with respect to the change in Gibbs Free Energy of the reduction reaction of either individual component versus zinc. Of course, alternatives to a zinc anode could be substituted for batteries having a different anode, as would be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art. The open circuit voltage being a thermodynamic characteristic, a high value will not always produce a high operating voltage due to kinetic considerations, however a high open circuit voltage is indicative of possible suitable additive candidates. Once a candidate material is selected based on calculating the change in Gibbs' Free Energy, one skilled in the art would recognize that simple experimentation may be performed to establish the discharge voltage of its combination. This aspect is discussed below with reference to a CuO/CuS mixture.
One aspect of the present invention provides a cathode having an active material whose discharge voltage is higher than CuO while providing cell service life at least 60% as long as a CuO electrode. Suitably, the discharge voltage of the battery incorporating a cathode additive having either 1) a higher discharge voltage than the first cathode active material or 2) a lower discharge voltage than the first cathode active material but, when combined with the first cathode active material, produces a combination having a discharge voltage higher than the first cathode active material, produces a discharge voltage greater than 1.05 V for at least an initial 5% of the cell discharge period (meaning the first 5% of a total length of time that the cell is discharged continuously until the operating voltage is reduced to a level of 0.8V) at a current density of 5 mA/g. Accordingly, a cathode constructed in accordance with aspects of the present invention achieves a higher discharge voltage than prior art cells including copper oxide cathode active materials, whose discharge voltages were not sufficiently high to operate modern devices.
One approach is to provide a cathode active material that comprises a physical mixture of an oxide of copper with another metal oxide. A second approach includes compounding or complexing a plurality of components to synthesize new cathode active materials that comprise copper and at least one other metal or non-metal. A third general approach is to provide a cathode having CuO mixed or combined in various ways with at least one additional material such that the Gibbs Free Energy of the overall reaction with zinc is increased as a result of displacement reactions between (for example) CuO and the additional material like copper sulfide (CuS). It is further recognized that various combinations of the described general approaches may be used to provide the desired result.
In the first approach, chemical components having the desirable physical characteristics (e.g., particle size, surface area, etc.) for use in a cathode can be physically mixed to homogeneity using standard processing methods known to those having ordinary skill in the art. In use, such a physical cathode mixture transitions from the discharge behavior of the higher oxide to that of the oxide of copper. Supplementary metal oxide additives to the oxide of copper can be chosen from the group of generally known positive electrode materials that independently provide higher operating voltages vs. zinc in the initial portion of discharge than does the oxide of copper. Suitable examples of positive electrode materials can include, but are not limited to, MnO2 (EMD or CMD), NiO, NiOOH, Cu(OH)2, Cobalt Oxide, PbO2, AgO, Ag2O, Ag2Cu2O3, CuAgO2, CuMnO2, and suitable combinations thereof.
Mn is used as an example herein since it is currently the most widely used cathode active material. Mn is therefore used in combination with Cu to increase the initial portion of the discharge curve of CuO while maintaining the longer service life provided by CuO. Similar methods can be utilized using other elements such as Ni, Co, Pb, Ag, etc. to enhance the voltage in the initial portion of the discharge curve as desired. Generally, the higher the oxidation state of an active material, the higher the discharge voltage.
By way of example, a cathode having an appropriate quantity of EMD MnO2 (say, 5-60%), which has an initially high operating voltage but a rather sloping discharge curve, can be mixed with CuO to yield a mixed cathode that exhibits the higher initial operating voltage of the MnO2 with an extended service life more characteristic of the CuO electrode at 1V. The MnO2 discharges first, followed by the CuO, with a relatively sharp transition between them. It is envisioned that by adding MnO2 to about 20% one can obtain almost the same discharge capacity as CuO (and significantly higher than MnO2 by itself), with the advantage of high operating voltage of the manganese oxide for the first 6 hours of the discharge as shown in
The discharge mechanisms of MnO2 and CuO are very different. In a standard Zn/MnO2 cell, the MnO2 has a density of 4.5 g/cc, consumes 1 mole of water per mole MnO2 incorporating protons into its structure to yield MnOOH (a poor electronic conductor and a material of lower density). The need for water for the cathode reaction limits the amount of active material (e.g. zinc) that can be used in the cell, resulting in relatively low volumetric energy density. The cathode also has a sloping discharge curve with little capacity below 1 V. On the other hand, copper oxide (CuO), which has a density of approximately 6.3 g/cc, consumes only half a mole of water per mole of CuO discharged for the first electron (with little volume expansion), has a very flat discharge curve, and provides high volumetric energy density in a cell.
In a cathode containing a physical mixture of the two, it appears that performance of the CuO portion of the cathode deteriorates as MnO2 content increases, presumably for the following reasons. In such a cathode, the CuO discharge reaction takes over after the MnO2 discharges its first electron. However, insufficient electrolyte is available to the CuO for efficient reaction, creating mass transfer polarization. The MnO2 volume expansion during discharge can separate the CuO particles from themselves and from the conducting material (e.g., synthetic or expanded graphite) that is usually provided in the cathode. This increases the ohmic resistance in the cathode, resulting in a further loss in voltage. Additionally, the anode is already partially discharged when the CuO discharge commences, contributing anode polarization to the cell voltage. The presumed net effect of these processes is that the CuO material operates at a lower voltage than it otherwise would, resulting in a lower than desirable battery voltage as shown in
Certain aspects of this invention (i.e., CuO≧40% by weight of cathode active material) also seek to mitigate the detrimental effects of dissimilar discharge behaviors by optionally providing in the cell a plurality of cathode active materials in separate layers or pellets (or in separate layers that can comprise mixtures of oxides), such that the operating voltage of a cell having a zinc anode and a cathode of the invention is higher than that of a Zn/CuO cell.
In the second general approach, a higher operating voltage than pure CuO, and a smoother and more continuous transition than in the preceding method, can be obtained by solution phase chemical compounding or synthesis using soluble cationic elements to produce mixed oxide compounds or complexes existing in one or more phases. Suitable elements can include, but are not limited to, Mn, Ni, Co, Fe, Sn, V, Mo, Pb, or Ag, or combinations thereof. Such mixed oxide compounds may also be produced via solid state reactions at appropriate temperatures, as one skilled in the art will readily appreciate.
In accordance with this aspect of the invention, the general formula of a copper based mixed oxide material of this invention is MxCuyOz (where M is any suitable element, as noted, while 1≦x≦5, 1≦y≦5 and 1≦z≦20). Compounds having AMxCuyOz as general formula (where A can be, e.g., Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Ca, Mg, Sr and Ba) can also be designed for use as cathode active materials.
One example of a process for preparing a mixed oxide cathode active material involves chemically reducing a mixed solution of salts together with a complexing agent and a reducing agent (e.g., sodium tetra-borohydride (NaBH4), sodium formate, formic acid, formaldehyde, fumaric acid or hydrazine) to produce a compound containing the metals. A complex compound of the form AMxCuy can also be prepared upon addition of a third metal salt as a precursor in this reduction step. The resulting product can be oxidized under acidic conditions with an oxidizing agent (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, potassium permanganate, potassium persulfate or potassium chlorate) to form a copper based mixed oxide.
For instance, Cu/Mn compounds prepared in this manner were confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis to be a mixed copper manganese oxide compound of a new phase. Although, no ASTM card corresponds to this oxide, its diffraction pattern is similar to that of Cu2Mn3O8. Other compounds such as Cu2Mn2O5 alone or in combination with CuO are also detected when the pH of hydrogen peroxide is made more acidic during the oxidation process. Oxidation conditions substantially affect the crystalline structure of the copper based mixed oxide.
It is also envisioned that oxidation of the Cu/Mn compounds can be carried out in, for example, an alkaline solution or a solution having a neutral pH. Organic or inorganic acid (or base) can be used to adjust the pH of the oxidation solution. Also, the compounds can be first heat treated prior to chemical oxidation. Furthermore, copper mixed oxide compounds can be heat-treated prior to being mixed with conducting material to form cathode.
The compounds can also be prepared by known mechanical alloying methods using a high-energy ball mill or by direct high-temperature melting in a furnace. It is further envisioned that MxCuyOz- or AMxCuyOz-copper based mixed oxide materials can alternatively be made by co-precipitating a mixture of metal salt solution followed by heating the precipitate under appropriate conditions.
Another process for preparing a mixed metal oxide comprises oxidizing a soluble first metal salt such as copper (I or II) salt (e.g., copper acetate) by potassium permanganate in alkali solution. The first metal is oxidized to a higher oxidation state while the Mn in the permanganate is reduced.
Another process can be used to synthesize a higher voltage cathode material containing copper. Specifically Cu in the +3 state is synthesized in a silver compound using AgNO3 and Cu(NO3)2.3H2O, and the mixed solution is oxidized using K2S2O8 in the presence of KOH. Such an oxide in KOH would, however, generate anode-fouling copper and silver species. The present invention therefore also provides a separator system that overcomes this difficulty and yields a viable battery having an acceptable shelf life, as is described in more detail below.
In a related embodiment, a cathode active material can be obtained by a combination of physical admixing with chemical synthesis. This combination provides copper oxide on the surface of the manganese oxide to facilitate smooth transitions between the phases and discharge profiles of the individual compounds. Using this combination, it is possible to obtain the voltage profiles shown in
In accordance with an embodiment of this method, CuO and Ag2O are precipitated from CuSO4 and AgNO3, respectively in alkali media in the presence of EMD. The cathode material can contain for example, 64% CuO, 35% EMD and approximately 1% Ag2O added as a conductivity enhancer. The Ag2O will discharge first, producing highly conducting metallic silver in the cathode. Synthetic, natural or expanded graphites as are well known in the art provide adequate electronic conductivity and integrity to the cathode. The resulting cathode, shown in
In the third general approach, supplementary additives can also be chosen for combining, from elements or compounds that have a lower discharge voltage than CuO, but which, in combination with CuO, produce a higher discharge voltage than either constituent alone. When the reaction kinetics are suitably rapid, the discharge voltage of these couples also follows the same trend as the open circuit voltage. Examples of such materials may include, but are not limited to, elemental sulfur, selenium, tellurium, sulfides, selenides, tellurides, and iodates such as CuS, Ag2S, ZnS, B2S3, SnS, FeS, Fe2S3, CoS, NiS, CuSe, CuTe, CuAgS, CuAg3S, and suitable compounds and mixtures thereof. For example, it is believed for the case of a CuO/CuS combination, that the discharge voltage is unexpectedly higher as a result of a displacement reaction between CuO and CuS (i.e., CuS having a discharge voltage lower than CuO). Thus, while pure CuS by itself has a lower discharge voltage versus zinc (0.7V vs. Zn), the combination of CuS with CuO discharges at a higher voltage than either material by itself. Shown below are theoretical open circuit voltages for relevant reactions to help illustrate the CuO/CuS system:
Copper Oxide Reduction Reaction: (Reaction I)
2CuO+2e+H2O→Cu2O+2OH− ΔG=−50.2 K cal
Copper Sulfide Reduction Reaction (Reaction 2)
2CuS+2e+H2O→Cu2S+HS−+OH− ΔG=−32.6 K cal
Copper Oxide/Copper Sulfide Mixture Reduction Reaction: (Reaction 3)
CuO+CuS+2e+H2O→Cu2S+2OH− ΔG=−54.6 K cal
To determine the change in Free Energies and Open Circuit Voltages above, the anode reaction used was:
Zn+20H−→ZnO+H2O+2e
The experimental OCV values obtained were found to reflect the theoretical values quite well. It has also been determined that the reaction kinetics are sufficiently rapid, resulting in the discharge voltage of a CuO/CuS combination being higher than the discharge voltage CuO or CuS alone versus Zinc. The change in Gibbs' Free Energies were calculated from the free energies of formation of reactants and products, available in the “The oxidation states of the elements and their potentials in aqueous solutions”, Second Edition, Wendell M. Latimer, Prentice Hall, Inc, 1952, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference to the extent that it discusses the free energies of formation of reactants and products of the type described herein. The open circuit voltages were calculated utilizing the formula ΔG=−nFE, where Delta G refers to the free energy change of a reaction, n refers to the number of electrons involved in the reaction, F is the Faraday constant (96500 coulombs/mole) and E is the voltage in V as one skilled in the art would readily recognize.
It is believed that the ratio of CuO to CuS dictates the discharge voltage profile. For example, an excess of CuS in a CuO/CuS mixture will cause the reaction to proceed in two steps, where Reaction 3 proceeds first at about 1.18V, until the CuS is consumed, followed by Reaction 1 at approximately 1.09V vs. Zinc. Since the copper oxide/copper sulfide mixture reduction reaction consumes equi-molar amounts of CuO and CuS, use of a mixture containing a 1:1 molar ratio of CuO and CuS provides a discharge profile at approximately 1.1V for the entire capacity, without a lower discharge plateau as is observed when CuO is in excess as described above. 1:1 molar ratio represents a 45/55 weight ratio of CuO/CuS for the mixture.
Various versions of this invention encompass a molar ratio within the range of 0.5:1 and 1:1.5 CuO/CuS, and one-tenth increments of CuO between 0.5:1 and 1.5:1, with a suitable molar ratio of approximately 1:1.
Table 1 shows the theoretical capacity to −0.9V vs. Hg/HgO reference electrode that can be obtained from cathodes containing various CuO/CuS molar ratio blends.
For a cylindrical cell (AAA, AA, C, D) for which annular cylindrical cathodes are formed ex-situ or in-situ, it has been discovered that the unique characteristics of the CuS material can be leveraged to allow tablet densities hitherto not seen in commercial alkaline batteries. The cathodes in present day commercial alkaline batteries have densities of about 3.2 g/cc of cathode volume. With appropriate choice (e.g. about 97%) of CuO, CuS, conducting carbon (e.g., about 3% or KS4 and/or expanded graphite) and processing conditions (e.g., using a standard hydraulic or pelletting press), cathode densities of about 3.5 g/cc up to about 4.5 g/cc of cathode volume can be achieved. A skilled artisan will appreciate that variants of these concentrations can also produce the stated cathode densities. This allows significantly more active material to be packed into a cell, to provide batteries with longer service life than previously known. AA cells with delivered capacities up to 4 Ah may be produced, which are significantly improved OVER present day commercial alkaline batteries having deliverable capacities of about 2.5-2.8 Ah.
The present inventors also recognize that jet-milling of commercially available CuO to reduce particle size and increase surface area results in a higher operating voltage. The surface area plays an important role in the reaction kinetics and hence the operating voltage of the battery. The present invention recognizes that an applied current to a cathode creates a stress that is distributed among the entire surface area of the cathode. Accordingly, cathodes having a greater surface area perform better than those having smaller surface areas as illustrated in
In addition to mechanical attrition and air-jet milling, the surface area of the CuO can also be increased by modifying the process conditions during synthesis of the CuO, particularly if using a solution process. Jet milling of as-received commercial CuO (from Sigma/Aldrich, located in St. Louis, Mo.) is shown to more than double the BET surface area from ˜1.27 m2/g to ˜5.57 m2/g. Solution synthesized CuO can be obtained, where suface areas are significantly higher, thereby providing electrodes with lower polarization. A commonly known method to determine surface areas of powders is the BET method, which uses the principle of gas adsorption of the surface of the particles to estimate the surface area. A commercially available Tristar 3000 Gas Adsorption Analyzer and Smart prep Degasser manufactured by Micromeretics Corp., located in Norcross, Ga. were used for the analysis. 1 gram samples were used, after degassing for 2 hours. The results are illustrated in Table 2.
Chemically synthesized agglomerates of a nano-CuO may also be used for the cathode. Such materials can be obtained from NanoScale Materials, Inc. 1310 Research Park Drive, Manhattan, Kans. 66502 USA. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the particle size is within a range whose lower end is between, and includes, 0.1 microns and 10 microns, and whose upper end is between, and includes, 50 microns and 150 microns. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the CuO has a surface area within a range whose lower end is between, and includes, 0.5 m2/g, 1 m2/g, and 5 m2/g, and whose upper end is between, and includes, 20 m2/g, 30 m2/g, 60 m2/g, 70 m2/g, and 100 m2/g.
The particle size, particle size distribution (PSD) and Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) surface area of the CuS are believed to play an important role in achieving the desired cathode packing density and integrity, as well as discharge voltage characteristics. The relative PSD's of the CuO and CuS are also believed to be important considerations in making blends, as would be appreciated by one of skill in the art.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the particle size of CuS is within a range whose lower end is between, and includes, 0.1 microns and 10 microns, and whose upper end is between, and includes, 50 microns and 150 microns. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the CuS has a surface area within a range whose lower end is between, and includes, 0.5 m2/g, 1 m2/g, and 5 m2/g, and whose upper end is between, and includes, 20 m2/g, 30 m2/g, 60 m2/g, 70 m2/g, and 100 m2/g.
One problem with sulfur or sulfide containing mixtures in the cathode is the solubility of sulfur species in alkaline electrolytes (such as KOH) and their migration toward the zinc anode where they can foul and interfere with the anode's reactions and lead to passivation, self-discharge or other undesirable situations that, depending on the conditions, depress the anode voltage. Hence it is desirable to block, tie-up or slowdown this process of species generation and migration in order to produce a practical battery with reasonable shelf life. Various aspects of this invention teach the use of special separator materials as well as methods to practice the preparation and sealing of the separator seams, in order to allow one to utilize the high operating voltage and still produce a battery with reasonable shelf life.
Various versions of the present invention recognize the good lubricating properties and high conductivity of CuS in practice. Use of CuS in a mixture therefore allows the reduction or elimination of conducting carbons in the cathode and provides an additional 5-7 wt. % room for active material, thereby further increasing cell capacity. In a related aspect, the conductive and lubricating properties of CuS may be utilized to replace the conductive carbon coating 22 currently used on the internal can surfaces in alkaline batteries (See
The initial voltage of this combination of CuO/CuS could be further increased by the presence of other higher voltage cathode active materials such as MnO2, NiO, NiOOH, CuAg2O4 and the like. Unfortunately, if the individual material characteristics are not properly matched, then any mismatch before, during or after discharge causes the performance of the later discharging material to be inferior to its normal discharge behavior, as was shown in
While this has been demonstrated in the example of
Each layer or pellet comprises either a distinct cathode active material or a physical mixture of the materials suitable for use in combination with the invention. It is specifically contemplated that where separate cathode layers or pellets are provided, at least one layer or pellet can comprise a physical mixture of copper oxide with another additive (e.g., a metal oxide or sulfide) while another layer or pellet can comprise a mixed compound. Likewise, a layer or pellet can comprise a physical mixture of a mixed oxide compound with an additive (e.g., another metal oxide or sulfide).
The concept is shown in
In a button cell battery where the cathode is in a disk form, the active materials can be in layers one over the other, or as concentric circles (discs) one within the other as shown in
For a prolate cylindrical battery configuration, which uses a cylindrical cathode in a can, either pressed externally and inserted, or fabricated in-situ in the can, the same concept can be used to keep the materials separated as shown in
It is recognized that a mixture of CuO and CuS in a cathode can raise the operating voltage of the cathode in alkaline solution compared to a cathode including CuO alone. However, it has been discovered that a mixture of CuO and CuS can react when stored in an alkaline solution, and produce soluble sulfur species that, if allowed to migrate unheeded to the anode, can adversely affect the performance of the zinc anode. For purposes herein those species that adversely impact the performance of a zinc anode are referred to as anode-fouling species. Examples of anode-fouling species are well known to those skilled in the art and include various Cu, Ag, S, Fe, Ni, and Sb species.
For instance, it is recognized that, when the cathode contains sulfur, one or more sulfur species, such as sulfide, sulfate, sulfite, or thiosulfate may be produced that tend to migrate to the anode, thereby fouling the anode. In these situations, it is desirable to further provide an additive that reduces the ability of the sulfur species to foul the anode. The additive can be included in the anode, cathode, electrolyte, or separator and operate at the location where anode-fouling species would be generated, at the separator where the fouling species would migrate through the separator, or after anode-fouling species migrate through the separator from the cathode towards the anode but prior to the fouling species interact with and foul the anode. The additive can operate either by binding to the sulfur species or chemically interacting (e.g. by oxidation, reduction complexing, coordinating, etc. . . . ) with the sulfur species to form a non-anode-fouling product, such as a metal sulfide or non-anode-fouling sulfate having a reduced solubility. Furthermore, the additive can reduce the effect of anode-fouling soluble species by modulating the local hydroxide ion concentration within the electrode. Precipitation is a vehicle for removing soluble species from solution by reducing their solubility. The solubilities are represented by their Ksp value. It has been determined that low solubility products of the product of the reaction between the additive and the anode-fouling soluble species are beneficial. One such beneficial solubility product has been found to be less than or equal to 2×10−25. The additive can also catalyze the dis-proportionation between the various sulfur species that exist in alkaline electrolytes to convert them to less anode-fouling species, thereby reducing the fouling. It will thus be appreciated that the additive can mitigate anode-fouling either by effectively limiting sulfur migration from the cathode to the anode, and/or reacting with the sulfur species to form an innocuous product or a less fouling product. Various versions of the present invention recognize that suitable additives include, but are not limited to, bismuth oxide (Bi2O3), bismuth hydroxide (Bi(OH)3), and zinc oxide (ZnO). Example 9 below, for instance, describes the effect of a ZnO additive in a CuO/CuS cathode. Each of these chemicals, when added to a sulfur-containing cathode, have been found to reduce the ability of the sulfur species to foul the anode, either by reacting with the sulfur species or by effectively limiting the sulfur species from migrating through the separator to the anode. One skilled in the art will recognize that additives performing a similar function can also be targeted toward anode fouling soluble copper species. Complexing agents like EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid), ethanol amines, oxalic or citric acid etc. interact with metal ions in solution.
Anode:
A high capacity anode-formulation is also provided for use in alkaline cells. As noted, cathodes of conventional alkaline cells, for example cathodes whose cathode active ingredient is MnO2, consume more water by the cathodic reaction than is produced by the anodic reaction (i.e., the reaction of zinc anode and electrolyte). Hence the total cell reaction, as represented, consumes water as shown below and are thus said to be “water consuming”:
Zn+MnO2+H2O→ZnO+MnOOH
The zinc anodes of conventional alkaline cells are thus generally limited to a concentration of zinc by weight below 70% in the anode because higher zinc loadings will not discharge efficiently as the anode would not contain sufficient quantities of electrolyte to properly sustain the water consuming reaction in the cathode. Furthermore, high zinc loadings with conventional particle size distributions result in higher mass transfer polarization due to the low porosity of these anodes leading to early anode passivation and premature failure.
The anode provided in accordance with an embodiment is usable in an electrochemical cell whose cathode consumes less water than conventional alkaline manganese dioxide cells, and achieves a higher discharge efficiency compared to conventional cells. Because the copper oxide and mixed copper oxide active materials of the cathode are low-water-consuming, the amount of electrolyte required in the anode is reduced relative to a conventional zinc manganese dioxide alkaline cell. The low-water consuming reaction advantageously permits an increase in zinc loading in the anode and thereby facilitating a longer cell service life.
It has been determined that a CuO-containing cathode is one example of a cathode that consumes less water than alkaline manganese dioxide cells. A zinc/air battery cathode is an example wherein the reaction does not consume water and the anode operates efficiently at anode zinc loadings of 68% to 76% by weight relative to the total weight of the anode (including electrolyte), which is significantly higher than in a conventional alkaline manganese cell.
The anode thus constructed in accordance with an embodiment can be “drier” than conventional electrochemical cells, meaning that the anode has a higher loading of zinc particles that can be efficiently discharged with reduced electrolyte concentrations given the following anodic cell reaction:
Zn+4OH−→Zn(OH)42−+2e−
In conventional alkaline batteries, the depletion of hydroxide ions can become prominent during medium and high continuous discharge rates (e.g., greater than 250 mA for a size AA cell) and induce depressed cell performance due to anode failure in these cases. Furthermore when the electrolyte is saturated with zincate Zn(OH)42− produced in the above reaction, the zincate precipitates to form zinc oxide which, in turn, passivates the zinc anode, thereby lowering cell performance. Conventional zinc powders contain particles having a wide distribution of particle sizes ranging from a few microns to about 1000 microns, with most of the particle size distribution ranging between 25 microns and 500 microns. Therefore, in order to achieve proper discharge of such conventional zinc powders, a KOH concentration above 34% is conventionally used and necessary.
The present inventors have discovered that a narrow particle size distribution as described in more detail below allows the use of electrolyte concentrations significantly lower than in conventional alkaline batteries. This in turn further favors lower Cu solubility into the electrolyte, better wetting of the cathode surface and assists the discharge efficiency of the cathode.
Specifically, a KOH concentration less than 36% (for example between 25% and 34% KOH concentration) is desirable, using principles of the present invention while avoiding premature anode passivation that would occur in a conventional cell.
Various aspects of the present invention recognize that the particle size distribution (“PSD”) of the zinc plays a role in enhancing the effectiveness of discharge in a low zinc loading anode, as is described in more detail below. In particular, several PSD's have been identified that allow the use of the lower electrolyte concentrations while providing the necessary anode porosity for an efficient discharge at high zinc loadings.
The present inventors have recognized that physical modifications to the anode can also improve cell service life, either alone or in combination with chemical modifications noted above. For example, one can efficiently discharge cells having an advantageously lower concentration of hydroxide ions in the electrolyte than can be used in conventional cells by reducing diffusion resistance for the hydroxide ions. This can be accomplished, for example, by adjusting the zinc particle size distribution to provide in the anode a narrow distribution of similar zinc particle sizes, thereby enhancing porosity (diffusion paths) for the hydroxide ion transport. In addition to improving mass transport in the gelled anode matrix, the particle size distributions of this invention also provide increased porosity, which allow for less precipitation of ZnO on the zinc particle surface, thereby delaying anode passivation compared to the particle size distributions typically found in conventional cells. This approach is effective for use in the anodes of various aspects of the invention and can be used alone or in combination with other improvements disclosed herein.
Similarly, a suitable zinc particle size distribution is one in which at least about 70% of the particles have a standard mesh-sieved particle size within a 100 micron size range and in which the mode of the distribution is between about 100 microns and about 300 microns. It is desirable that 70% of the particles be distributed in a size distribution range even more narrow than 100 microns, for example 50 microns or even 40 microns or less.
A suitable gelled anode as described herein comprises a metal alloy powder (desirably an alloyed zinc powder), a gelling agent and an alkaline electrolyte. One skilled in the art can readily select a suitable zinc powder (alloyed with In, Bi, Ca, Al, Pb, etc). As used herein, “zinc” refers to a zinc particle that may include an alloy of zinc as is well known to one skilled in the art. Another aspect of the electrochemical cells described herein is that the anode may contain little or no mercury (e.g., less than about 0.025% by weight). It is noted that known gelling agents other than the desirable sodium polyacrylate gelling agent are suitable for use in various aspects of the present invention. Such gelling agents include carboxymethyl cellulose, crosslinked-type branched polyacrylate acid, natural gum, and the like.
The present inventors recognize that another factor that controls cell performance relates to the surface area of the anode. Specifically, increasing the active anode electrode surface area provides sufficient active reaction sites needed to keep up with the cathode reaction at high discharge rates. Accordingly, cells are provided having a predetermined amount of zinc particles (which may either be in the form of zinc or a zinc alloy) added to the anode gel. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, zinc particles less than about 75 microns (−200 mesh size), that is, particles that pass a 200 mesh screen size are present in the anode in an amount less than about 10%, by weight relative to the total zinc in the anode (including coarse zinc particles), and desirably within the range of 1% and 10%, alternatively between the range of 1% and 8%, or alternatively within the range of 4% and 8%; it being appreciated that smaller particles further increase the effective surface area of the anode. Mesh sizes are stated herein to specify a range of particle sizes. For example, −200 mesh indicates particles smaller than 75 microns, while +200 mesh indicates particles larger than 75 microns. Alternatively, desirable results may also be attained using an amount of zinc fines greater than 10%, while the zinc particles having a diameter between 75 and 105 microns (+75 and −140 mesh size) may be present at anywhere between 1% and 50%, and more suitably between 10% and 40%, by weight of total zinc present in the anode.
Various aspects of the present invention recognize that multiple ranges of zinc particles having a diameter less than 105 microns (−140 mesh size) including particles between 75 and 105 microns (+200 and −140 mesh size) and zinc fines less than 75 microns (−200 mesh size), may be used to increase cell performance. For instance, the anode may include zinc particles between 75 and 105 micrometers, with the advantages in cell performance being enhanced when the anode gel has an electrolyte (KOH) concentration less than 30%, alternatively between 20% and 30%. When zinc fines have a size between the range of 20 and 75 micrometers (+625 and −200 mesh size), and alternatively between 38 and 75 micrometers (+400 and −200 mesh size), cell performance is particularly enhanced when the KOH concentration is between 30% and 40%, and desirably between 33% and 38%. Yet another suitable range is between 20% and 34%, alternatively, between 25% and 33%, and alternatively, between 25% and 30%. A “low KOH concentration” as used in this disclosure refers to a KOH concentration within or below any of the above-stated ranges.
Although it is known that improved cell performance can result from the use of zinc fines in combination with the low KOH concentrations, one skilled in the art would also recognize the benefits of the use of zinc fines and reduced KOH concentration individually.
While it is particularly desirable to increase the cell operating voltage in CuO containing cells which are generally associated with lower cell potentials, it will be appreciated that certain aspects of the present invention provide for cathodes that contain oxides that comprise copper, but wherein the cathode contains not CuO alone, but CuO in combination with other oxides, sulfides, or mixed copper oxide materials. In certain embodiments, the cathode may be more water consuming than in others. Depending upon the composition of the cathode, one skilled in the art will be able to determine the acceptable modification to the anode that corresponds to the reduced water consumption of such cathodes.
Lower electrolyte concentrations are desirable in the CuO containing systems to improve reaction kinetics, reduce copper ion dissolution (hence migration into the anode), and achieve a high operating voltage. The use of a lower concentration electrolyte (relative to the electrolyte concentration in the anode) to prewet the cathode is believed to result in performance improvements attributed to improved wettability of the cathode. Lower copper ion migration to the zinc reduces self-discharge and gassing at the anode during storage, which results in improved shelf life. Low anode polarization also contributes to achieving the desired close circuit voltage in the cell.
Various versions of the anode described herein result in a number of advancements in the art when compared to conventional anodes usable in a typical Zn/MnO2 alkaline cell. These advancements include:
1. Higher zinc loadings that take advantage of the low-water consuming cathode reaction compared to a conventional Zn/MnO2 alkaline cell. If one were to increase zinc loadings in a conventional alkaline cell, it would typically result in less electrolyte (less water) available for the cathode and thereby inhibit cathode discharge performance. The high water consuming chemistry therefore restricts the overall cell design in conventional cells. In addition, the high capacity and/or density of CuO allows higher capacity cathodes to be packed in less volume than MnO2 cathodes, allowing higher quantities of anode to be placed in the cells, while still maintaining a level of electrolyte required by the cell. This significantly increases the anode capacity to cell volume ratio (Ah/cc) compared to conventional alkaline cells into a range that was not previously known to be attainable. For instance, conventional commercial alkaline cells are restricted to an anode capacity/internal cell volume ratio of ˜0.5 Ah/cc based on a zinc capacity of 820 mAh/g and an MnO2 capacity of 400 mAh/g based on a 1.33 electron reduction of MnO2. A cell constructed in accordance with various aspects of the present invention achieves an anode capacity/cell internal volume ratio >0.5 Ah/cc, between 0.55 and 0.9 Ah/cc, and further between 0.55 and 0.7 Ah/cc. The PSD, particle shape, and electrolyte concentration of this invention allows high zinc loading anodes to be discharged at a high efficiency. This results in higher cell capacity.
2. The proper choice of zinc powder PSD of this invention enables the use of lower electrolyte concentrations without the premature passivation that would otherwise occur with regular powders in conventional alkaline cells. In particular, passivation generally occurs in electrochemical cells when the anodic reaction produces zinc oxide, which covers the remaining zinc in the anode, thereby preventing the KOH from accessing and reacting with the remaining zinc. It is well known that conventional MnO2 alkaline cell anodes having conventional PSD prematurely passivate when lower electrolyte concentrations are used. Conventional anode particle sizes are distributed between 45-500 microns, thus within a broad range of 455 microns, rather than a narrow range of 100 to 150 microns that is envisaged by the present inventors.
In accordance with an alternative embodiment, the zinc PSD's disclosed herein desirably can be distributed within a narrow window of 200 microns and, alternatively, 150 microns, meaning that between and including 90% and 95%, and up to 100%, of the particle sizes, by weight, are within the 150, or 200, micron window, and in particular are tight distributions substantially centered around 100 μm, 175 μm and 250 μm, and 300 μm (meaning that between and including 90% and 95%, and up to 100% of the zinc particles have particle sizes centered around the specified sizes). One skilled in the art will recognize that mesh sizes corresponding to these particle sizes can be identified using ASTM Designation: B214-99. The PSD's herein increase the zinc anode porosity, thereby reducing passivation. A zinc powder with a tight PSD centered around 100 μm is illustrated, for example, in
3. The PSD's when combined with a lower electrolyte concentration typically result in a higher cell operating voltage. In particular,
4. Lower electrolyte concentrations are believed to reduce copper ion solubility, resulting in lower copper ion migration to the anode. Referring now to
5. Lower electrolyte concentrations also improve the wettability of the CuO containing cathode, which is believed to result in better reaction kinetics. CuO is more hydrophobic than EMD MnO2 as can be seen in
Separator
One version of a suitable separator material has a polymer backbone formed from a straight chain, a branched chain, or variants thereof. Examples of materials having such a backbone that have been found to provide a suitable separator include polyvinyl alcohol, (PVA), poly (ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol-EVOH), copolymers of polystyrene, blends or co-extrusions of these and like materials such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, and variants of the foregoing. Additional suitable separator materials include cellulosic films such as cellophane and variants thereof. However, not all such polymers are suitable. Rather, suitable polymers retain electrolyte in the separator where, in the separator, the retained electrolytes have a pH value lower than the bulk electrolyte found in the cathode and the anode. The separator-retained electrolyte desirably has a pH value that is 0.5 to 3 pH units lower than the pH of the bulk electrolyte. The extent to which electrolyte is retained in the separator, and the extent to which the pH of the retained electrolyte can vary from that of the bulk electrolyte, can be modulated by polymer side groups provided on the backbone. Alcohol side groups are suitable, ranging from simple hydroxyl groups to more complex side chains that comprise at least one alcohol moiety, including linear, cyclic and branched side chains that can comprise carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, silicon, and the like. Other side groups such as carboxylic acid functional groups can be provided on the separator to enhance or inhibit electrolyte retention or pH in the separator. The separator is hydrated by the bulk alkaline aqueous electrolyte, as in conventional cells, but the electrolyte retained in the hydrated separator has a characteristic pH lower than that of the bulk electrolyte.
The separator can be a film and is optionally formed on the cathode or inserted into the cell during cell manufacture. A particularly suitable film has as small a cross-sectional thickness as is practical while retaining manufacturing processibility (e.g., flexibility, mechanical stability, integrity at processing temperatures, integrity within the cell, and the like), adequate electrolyte absorption, as well as the advantageous properties noted herein. Suitable dry film thicknesses typically range from about 10 to about 250 microns. The present inventors have recognized that depending on the difference between the pH value of the bulk electrolyte and the pH value of the electrolyte retained in the separator, the thickness of a film separator may be selectively optimized to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling soluble species.
One version of the present invention includes a sealed separator system for an electrochemical cell that is disposed between a gelled zinc anode of the type described above and a cathode containing soluble species of copper, sulfur, or both, as described above. It should thus be appreciated that the term “sealed separator system” is used herein to define a structure that physically separates the cell anode from the cathode, enables hydroxyl ions and water to transfer between the anode and cathode, limits transport other than through the material itself by virtue of a seam and bottom seal, and effectively limits the migration through the separator of other soluble species such as copper, silver, nickel, iodate, and sulfur species from the cathode to the anode.
The utility of an alkaline electrochemical cell constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention can be significantly enhanced by providing in the cell an improved barrier-separator system that effectively limits the migration of anode-fouling soluble species from the cathode into the anode compartment while permitting migration of hydroxyl ions. With certain cathode materials, such as CuO, CuS, CuAg2O4 and Cu2Ag2O3, it is advantageous to use a separator system that employs a barrier to migration of the soluble species such as Cu, Ag, S, and the like, that are produced (migration reduced by at least about 50%; alternatively at least about 60%; finally at least about 70% in a test as described herein). Such barrier materials can include PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) films, modified or crosslinked PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) films, EVOH (ethyl vinyl alcohol), cellulose type films, and laminated or non-laminated combinations or synthetic hybrids of such films. These materials enable a larger variety of oxides, sulfides, and metal complexes to be used as cathode active materials in accordance with aspects of the present invention to produce a battery with improved shelf life.
The separator can further have structure and conductivity enhancing agents incorporated therein. The separator can be a conformal separator for use in an electrochemical cell wherein the separator comprises materials that effectively limit (i.e., at least about 50%, alternatively at least about 60%; at least about 70%; and finally at least about 90%) the soluble species from passing there-through.
The cathode of the invention can also be provided with an agent that effectively limits anode-fouling soluble species from migrating from the cathode toward the anode by interacting with the soluble species. Agents such as polyvinyl alcohol, activated carbon, natural and synthetic clays and silicates such as Laponite, etc. have shown an ability to absorb or block ionic species.
Aspects of the present invention thus overcome at least several difficulties associated with cells having soluble cathode materials in the cathode. These difficulties include:
1. Soluble copper or silver species from cathodes tend to diffuse and migrate to the anode side and deposit in the metallic form and can cause bridge shorting, anode gassing, or anode passivation. Bridge shorting occurs when a material such as zinc oxide, copper, or silver deposits and penetrates through the separator, forming a bridge between the anode and cathode, thereby shortening the battery life. Anode passivation can lead to varying degrees of anode-fouling, ranging from an increase of the anode resistance (hence higher internal resistance in the battery) to a complete shutdown of the anode reaction.
Sulfur species can also dissolve from the sulfide additives or other sulfur containing compounds present to form soluble sulfur species in the additives or other sulfur-containing compounds present to form soluble sulfur species in the alkaline electrolytes. These species can further react with each other and with other ions dissolved in the electrolyte, precipitating out either within the separator or at the separator-to-electrode interface, thereby hindering electrolyte transport between the cathode and anode or causing bridge shorting.
2. When the cathode contains sulfur either as a sulfide or as sulfur mixed with a metal oxide, the sulfide and sulfur can react with alkali and alkaline-earth hydroxides to form sulfides, polysulfides, thiosulfates, and sulfites in solution, which are capable of diffusing and/or migrating to the anode side of the cell, thereby passivating the anode and interfering with the discharge reaction as well as shelf life.
3. The above mentioned species can also react with each other and with other ions dissolved in the electrolyte, precipitating out either within the separator or at the separator-to-electrode interface, thereby blocking desirable ionic and electrolytic transport between the cathode and anode.
4. Even when the separator material effectively limits the migration of soluble copper species, silver species, sulfides, polysulfides, thiosulfates, sulfites, iodates, or similar anode-fouling soluble species, it should be appreciated that cylindrical cell separators have seams (in particular along one or more ends and the side of a cylindrical cell separator) that, if not adequately sealed, can provide avenues for these species to still diffuse and migrate into the anode. Conventional cylindrical cell separators cannot adequately limit such soluble species from migrating into the anode compartment. A “side seam” is defined herein as a seam located at overlapping ends (or potentially adjacent ends) of a cylindrical separator. An “end seam” is defined herein as a seam disposed at one of the open ends of a cylindrical cell separator. It should thus be appreciated that the terms “positive end” and “negative end” refers to the ends of the separator that are disposed proximal the positive and negative ends of a cylindrical cell, respectively, after separator installation into the cell. A “peripheral end seam” is defined herein as the outer periphery of a flat and round, square or rectangular separator that is to be sealed when installed into a button or prismatic cell.
Various aspects of the present invention provide separator combinations and configurations that overcome many of the above-mentioned difficulties for electrochemical cells having or producing a variety of anode-fouling species, such as copper, silver, and sulfur.
Separator Materials and Combinations:
Difficulties 1, 2, and 3 can be addressed by selecting appropriate separator materials or combinations of materials.
In accordance with various aspects of the present invention, several materials and combinations of materials have been found effective for alkaline cells having a gelled zinc anode and copper, silver and sulfur ions in the cathode. These materials were further evaluated to determine what material property effectively limited the migration of the anode-fouling soluble species.
It has been determined that a relatively high physical porosity in the form of open pores that extend through the separator from the anode side of the separator to the cathode side of the separator is undesirable in the separator. For instance, cellophanes, PVA, EVOH, TiO2-filled high molecular weight polyethylene (HMWPE) membranes, and the like are anticipated as illustrated and described with reference to Examples 1-3 below. A HMWPE sample is available from Advanced Membrane Systems, located in Billerica, Mass., and is a porous membrane that can be filled with TiO2 to decrease the porosity and increase the tortuosity of the separator pores.
It has also been determined that PVA films or fabrics coated or impregnated with polymers such as PVA, EVA and EVOH (each of which may be cross-linked), herein defined as a “hybrid separator,” are effective in limiting the migration of anode-fouling soluble species as described with reference to Example 6 below if the porosity is minimized or eliminated.
While a non-woven fabric substrate coated or impregnated with an appropriate polymer like PVA or EVA is effective in limiting Cu, Ag, and S migration, it is desirable to reduce the thickness of the material and also to form a relatively impervious film using such materials. In this regard, PVA film may be cast directly from a water-based solution on a substrate from which the dried film can be easily peeled off. A 10% PVA solution (Celvol grade 350 PVA from Celanese Ltd., Dallas, Tex.) cast on a Mylar substrate/release film at 70° C. may be used. Experiments per the prescribed Exclusion Test method show that the film possesses desirable barrier properties against migration of copper, silver and sulfur species. Commercially available PVA films have also been evaluated, showing similar trends. One example of a manufacturer of such PVA films is Monosol LLC located in Portage, Ind. Several samples from Monosol have been evaluated, some containing processing aids and/or plasticizers. The resistance of the films in concentrated KOH has also been measured, showing that as the ability to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling species improves, the ionic resistance increases. In general, PVA film samples containing significant amounts of plasticizer are less effective at limiting migration of soluble species while maintaining acceptably low ionic resistance. It may be appreciated by those skilled in the art, that effective limitation of the migration of soluble species can be attained by selecting the polymer properties, including the chemical composition, molecular weight, molecular weight distribution, additives and by appropriate cross-linking.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other polymer solutions may also be used to coat or impregnate non-woven or cellophane separators and achieve effects similar to those seen with PVA when used as a separator for electrochemical cells having a zinc anode and a cathode that contains anode-fouling soluble species. Alternatively, polymer solutions can coat the anode or cathode directly, thereby providing a conformal separator. It should thus be appreciated that many of the polymer solutions discussed below as forming part of a hybrid separator (e.g., a non-woven fabric separator coated or impregnated with the polymer) can alternatively be applied directly to the inner cathode surface or outer anode surface to provide a conformal separator that enables hydroxide ion transport while effectively limiting the migration of soluble copper, silver, and sulfur species. This type of separator can also minimize the need for separate side seam or bottom seal.
Other such polymers are ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) emulsion (that contains vinyl acetate monomers), vinyl acetate-ethylene copolymers and vinyl acetate polymers that can be coated or impregnated onto a nonwoven separator to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling soluble species such as, for example, copper, silver, sulfides, polysulfides, thiosulfates, sulfites, iodates, iodides, phosphates, silicates, or carbonates as described in Example 7 below. Another suitable polymer is EVOH.
Organic or inorganic materials, such as Laponite, Bentonite or smectite clays, or clay like materials, can also be incorporated into the polymer solutions to further enhance the performance of the polymer coated separator by providing structure or enhancing ion transport or ionic conductivity. The performance of a separator having Laponite incorporated into a cross-linked PVA-coated non-woven F3T23 separator in a 357 size cell is illustrated and described below in Example 8.
It has further been discovered that a separator can include a first group (Group I) of separator materials (e.g. cellophane, TiO2 filled HMWPE, etc.) that effectively limits the migration of the anode-fouling soluble copper and silver species in combination with a second group (Group II) of separator materials (e.g. PVA film or PVA coated on or impregnated in a non-woven separator, with or without cross-linking) that effectively limits the migration of the anode-fouling soluble sulfur species. The combination effectively limits soluble copper, Ag and sulfur species. A separator including a combination of Groups I and II is thus effective in minimizing the difficulties 1, 2, and 3 discussed above. Such a separator is tested below in Examples 5 and 6. The two separator materials can be stacked, laminated, or coated in various combinations. For instance, a Group I material can be coated onto an anode-facing or cathode-facing surface of a non-woven separator of Group II (or layers of suitable non-woven separators), or alternatively can be placed between adjacent layers of non-woven separator coated with PVA or a combination of suitable non-woven separators.
One measure of the suitability of a separator to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling soluble species is the air permeability of the separator. Air permeability can be measured in Gurley seconds, as appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art. Because the Gurley test measures the length of time necessary to pass a predetermined volume of air through a separator, a longer time measurement is an indication of low air permeability. A separator having a Gurley Air Permeability of 500 Gurley seconds or higher has been found suitable for use in an electrochemical cell described above, while overcoming difficulties 1, 2, and 3. The Gurley measurement was taken using Model No. 4150N, commercially available from Gurley Precision Instruments, located in Troy, N.Y., at a pressure drop of 12.2 inches of water to displace 10 cc air through a 1 sq. inch area. The higher the Gurley air permeability, the better. One having ordinary skill in the art will now recognize that a film separator having a relatively high Gurley air permeability will have few, if any, open pores.
It is to be appreciated that air permeability is not necessarily an accurate indicator of the permeability of the separator when wet with electrolyte containing the anode-fouling soluble species. Hence, a more direct measure of the suitability of a separator to effectively limit the migration of the anode-fouling soluble species is to use the results of a direct measurement analysis such as the Exclusion Test described below.
The separator is also compatible with known variations and improvements in cathode, anode and electrolyte structure and chemistry, but finds particular advantage for cells having a cathode that contains one or more cathode active materials comprising at least one of a primary oxide or sulfide of a metal, a binary oxide or sulfide of a metal, a ternary oxide or sulfide of a metal or a quaternary oxide or sulfide of a metal, where the metal is selected from manganese, copper, nickel, iron and silver, that can dissolve to form one or more anode-fouling soluble species, including but not limited to ionic metallic species and sulfur species, that can disadvantageously migrate from the cathode to the anode in the bulk electrolyte fluid in fluid communication with both the cathode and the anode. As used herein, “binary,” “ternary,” and “quaternary” refer to containing two, three or four of a particular species. Materials finding utility as cathode active materials include but are not limited to manganese dioxide, copper sulfide, copper oxide, copper hydroxide, nickel oxyhydroxide, silver oxides, copper iodate, nickel iodate, copper fluoride, copper chloride, copper bromide, copper iodide, copper silver oxides and copper manganese oxides, and combinations thereof. Combinations of cathode active materials can be provided in a cathode as mixtures or as separate entities.
In varying aspects of the invention, routes of fluid communication between the cathode and the anode, including the separator seams, are sealed to minimize or eliminate fluid communication (e.g., of bulk electrolyte) except through the separator material, at least one layer of which is provided. Moreover, substantially all anode-fouling species in the bulk electrolyte are desirably retained on the cathode side of the separator and do not migrate to the anode. The separator is thus associated with an “Exclusion Value” that refers to a percentage of soluble species that is prevented from migrating from the cathode through the separator to the anode. “Substantially all” is intended to indicate that the separator has an Exclusion Value of at least about 50%; alternatively at least about 60%; alternatively at least about 70%, alternatively at least about 80%, alternatively at least about 85%; alternatively at least about 90%; alternatively at least about 95%; alternatively at least about 97%; and finally alternatively at least about 99% per the test method developed and described herein.
It will be appreciated, however, that to the extent the anode active material of a cell tolerates the soluble species, the cell can tolerate some migration through the separator of anode-fouling soluble species. Generally, therefore, a suitable separator effectively limits the migration of anode-fouling soluble species if the separator passes less of the species than the anode active material can tolerate without becoming fouled. Substantially lower amounts of the soluble species are desired, however.
Also, a substantial portion of the electrolyte retained in the separator, for instance at least about 50%, is associated with (typically, non-covalently associated with) the polymer backbone or its side groups. A suitable measure of such an association is obtained by analyzing the separator material to determine the temperature at which water retained in the separator melts after freezing. Whereas free water retained in, but not physically associated with, the polymer melts at about 0° C., a lower melting temperature indicates an association with the polymer and, accordingly, a desirable separator. A suitable method for determining the temperature at which separator-retained water transitions to the liquid phase employs a simple differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) test. A suitably sized sample of the separator material is swollen in water for one hour then immersed in liquid nitrogen until frozen. The frozen sample is melted at a rate of 2° C. per minute in a low temperature DSC apparatus (commercially available from TA Instruments (Newark, Del.)) and the melting temperature is observed at temperatures in the range of at least as low as about −30° C. to about 20° C. (See attached
A suitable separator material in a cell also desirably transports water over hydroxide ions, and hydroxide ions to soluble species. Attached
Separator Configuration and Seam and Bottom Sealing:
Difficulty number 4 described above (involving ion permeability through the separator side and/or end seam(s)) is addressed by the following methods and corresponding apparatus.
A sealed separator, while applicable to all battery systems, finds particular applicability to a system such as that described herein, where soluble species from one electrode can migrate to the other electrode, thereby degrading performance or shelf life. These are generally referred to as anode-fouling soluble species. In such cases, separator material alone can be insufficient because soluble species can migrate around a seam or end of the separator, unless a substantially impervious seal is provided.
As described above, it is desirable that fluid communication between the cathode and the anode via routes around the separator is minimized or eliminated by sealing the separator such that the anode is in substantial fluid isolation from the cathode except via a route through the separator. The method of sealing the separator material can be achieved by known methods, including adhesive sealing, heat sealing, ultrasonic sealing, and the like. The separator so formed can take the shape of a tube having a closed end. For water-soluble separator materials, including polyvinyl alcohol, softening the materials with a limited amount of water and then sealing with heat or pressure or both can form the seal. This arrangement is desirable as the fused separator seal typically limits the likelihood of an undesired channel for direct fluid communication between the cathode and the anode.
In a button or prismatic flat cell, a good seal is generally attainable to effectively limit anode-fouling soluble species from seeping around the separator, since the separator is pressed tightly against a flat surface (e.g., the disc or prismatic shaped electrode) by an opposing member such as an insulating grommet. In cylindrical cells however, a good seal is not easily achieved, since for ease, speed and cost of manufacture, the separator is normally inserted as a convolute, spiral wound tube or cross-placed into the cavity and the seam is difficult to seal.
A cylindrical separator can be provided having an outer periphery and a first and second end. The end of the separator to be disposed proximal the positive terminal end of the cell can be seamless, either during fabrication of the separator (i.e., via extrusion, melt blowing, and the like) or can be sealed by chemical or physical means to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling soluble species. Chemical sealing methods include the use of an adhesive with or without a chemical bond involved. Physical sealing methods include heat (welding), vibration (e.g. ultrasonic bonding), and application of pressure or combinations thereof. Various combinations of chemical and/or physical sealing methods may also be applied depending on the material of choice—for example, to bond a PVA film to itself, use of heat, water and/or pressure can be used to produce an effective seal/joint.
Among the chemical sealing methods, one method of forming such a seal involves using a cross-linkable polymer and a cross-linking agent to provide at least a seam seal and a bottom seal and desirably also a top seal (after introduction of the gelled anode into the separator cavity).
A seam-sealed and bottom sealed separator configuration can be produced externally and then inserted into a cell, or can be produced in situ after insertion of a spirally wound, convolute or cross-placed separator tube into a cell cavity.
Cross-linking locks a polymer in place and produces a seal that is intact throughout the life of the battery. Simple coagulation of the polymer or precipitation in a high pH environment typically produces a gelatinous mass that can move or be displaced by expansion or contraction during operation or physical or mechanical shock in normal handling or transportation, thereby compromising the seal. Adhesive polymers without cross-linking may also be used, it being desired, of course, that the seal produced is stable in the battery electrolyte over the life of the battery and it does not permit more transport of anode-fouling species at the seam or bottom seal, than the separator material itself.
With the proper choice of materials, both cross-linking and coagulation can be effective. Two suitable separator materials are presented as examples of ex-situ seals. One material is cellophane and the other is a hybrid separator, which comprises a non-woven fabric coated with PVA, which is cross-linked using a cross-linking agent. Sufficient loading of PVA is necessary (>5 g/m2) to make the non-woven paper substantially impermeable to air, with Gurley air permeability >500 sec. Low air permeability ensures that in a battery, when the polymer swells upon absorbing electrolyte, there would be substantially no paths for the transport of the anode-fouling soluble species through the material. To make a seam seal, a layer of viscous PVA solution (e.g., 2-10% by weight in water) is applied near the seam, the two surfaces brought together, followed by application of a thin layer of a cross-linking agent such as sodium borate or others known in the art. The seal area cross-links immediately, while also bonding the two surfaces together. A simple test of 5 days soak in concentrated KOH electrolyte shows that the seam is intact and cannot be physically torn apart, suggesting good operational characteristics in a battery. The efficacy of the seal in effectively limiting anode-fouling soluble species may be tested using the Exclusion Test described herein. Other suitable cross-linkable polymers suitable or use as the adhesive include but are not limited to polyethylene glycol, polyvinylbutyral, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
To produce a bottom seal, one end of a wound separator tube with at least some overlap between layers (and with a mandrel inside) is folded to form a cup over a disk shaped piece of the same or other separator-placed on the end face of the mandrel followed by a drop of the cross-linkable polymer (e.g. PVA). Upon addition of sufficient cross-linking agent, a cross-linked, adherent composite folded bottom is created, which effectively limits the migration of the anode-fouling soluble species. The tubular shaped separator can then be utilized to produce a battery in the traditional manner.
While an ex-situ seal as described above is very effective, it is not the most desirable from a battery design and performance perspective because there is often a gap that exists between the sealed tube and the cathode cavity. This space can create a poor wetted interface between the anode and the cathode, leading to poor battery performance, particularly after prolonged shelf storage. One solution to this problem is to use a separator that swells significantly upon electrolyte absorption, thereby filling the space that existed between the dry tube and the cathode. A pleated tubular shaped separator—that can expand after insertion can also be used. Another solution to the problem is to produce such a seal in-situ after insertion of a spiral wound tube (for example), as described below for the case of a cross-linkable polymer-coated non-woven separator. The particular advantage of an in-situ aspect is that when an unsealed spirally wound tube or cross-placed separator is inserted into a cavity, it has the opportunity to expand into the volume available and reduce the gap between itself and the cathode material to produce a good interface. This can be further aided in the case of a wound tube in the process of removing the insertion mandrel, by a slight counter-directional twist or a controlled jet of gas to allow or cause the separator to expand into the cavity since the seam is not yet sealed.
Hence in a desired embodiment, to obtain an in-situ seal, a non-woven separator may be coated with sufficient loading of a mixture of a cross-linkable polymer (e.g., PVA) and a cross-linking agent (e.g. a borate derivative) to render it substantially impervious (Gurley air permeability >500 sec). The cross-linking agent is selected such that it will not immediately cross-link the PVA (i.e. remain dormant until activated appropriately). An example of such a borate derivative cross-linking agent is boric acid. In this particular example, cross-linking will occur when the pH increases above 7 in the battery after (KOH) electrolyte contacts the separator, thereby activating the cross-linking agent. The substantially dry PVA/boric acid coated separator is wound around a mandrel (as in present day alkaline cell manufacturing) with at least some overlap between layers. One end is folded to form a cup shaped bottom, and the tube is inserted into a cathode cavity. A bottom disk comprising the same or other separator material coated with a cross-linkable polymer and cross-linking agent, as above, is next inserted into the tube so as to rest inside the folded bottom of the wound separator tube. When a pre-shot of electrolyte is introduced into the separator tube, or Zn gel containing electrolyte is added, it will cause cross-linking of the PVA in the presence of the boric acid, simultaneously also forming a seal or bond between adjacent layers of the separator, the bottom disk and tube, as well as the seam in the overlap region.
Another method of achieving the same objective is to start with a nonwoven paper, which has a sufficient amount of cross-linkable polymer, e.g. PVA (but without cross-linking agent) coated on it to render it substantially impervious (Gurley air permeability >500 sec). A folded bottom is created and it is inserted into a cathode cavity as described above, followed by insertion of a bottom cup coated or impregnated with PVA. Cross-linking agent (e.g. sodium borate) is next applied to the inserted separator tube, thereby simultaneously cross-linking and sealing the adjacent layers of the separator tube, the bottom to the bottom cup and the seal region at the overlap. It has been found that this process of cross-linking becomes more efficient if the separator is pre-wet or sprayed with water prior to application of the cross-linker. It should be appreciated that the correct process steps and conditions should be optimized based on the nature of the cross-linkable polymer and the cross-linker.
Other polymers and/or cross-linking agents can be used to achieve the same end result. By way of non-limiting example, carboxylic groups can be introduced into PVA and cross-linked with glutaraldehyde to improve film properties, as can regenerated cellulose coated or laminated on PVA or modified PVA. PVA can be copolymerized with acrylic acid to significantly lower ionic resistance. Acetylized PVA films can be modified with polyacrylic acid. Acrylic- or methacrylic acid-grafted PVA can also be used. Similarly, grafted methacrylic acid on a polyethylene or polypropylene membrane is also suitable as a separator.
In another aspect, a combination of the ex-situ and in-situ processes can also be used. For example, the PVA can first be applied to the wound separator seam and bottom of an appropriate separator material followed by insertion into the cell cavity. The requisite amount of sodium borate (or other) cross-linking agent may next be applied into the tube, to cause the assembly to cross-link and seal in place.
An additional aspect of this invention is the optional incorporation of conductivity and structure-enhancing fillers like Laponite, fumed silica, Bentonite, etc. into the separator during the polymer coating process. Since higher loadings of PVA than in conventional cells is required to make the non-woven layer impervious, this can increase the electrical resistivity of the separator. Incorporation of appropriate fillers will tend to enhance the conductivity to more acceptable levels and improve battery discharge characteristics.
A second general method of producing a sealed separator is physical, using a heat-sealable polymeric material, such as PVA, polyethylene, polypropylene, nylon, and the like. The seal is formed by providing a layer of the polymeric material, in the form of a continuous film, or porous fibrous film, and inserting the layer into the area to be sealed (e.g., the outer periphery of a separator to be installed into a size AA cell). The separator then can form a seal under controlled heating with or without application of pressure. The heat sealable polymeric layer can also be applied to one surface of a separator layer (that may or may not be heat sealable), and subsequently wound into a cylinder, such that the overlapping region will comprise a layer of the sealable polymeric material interfacing with another separator layer. The heat sealable polymeric material will thus seal against the other separator layer under a controlled heating condition. The polymeric material may further be positioned adjacent the outer periphery or the inner periphery cylindrical separator prior to forming the separator into a cylinder. Alternatively, the polymeric material can be applied to the interface of two overlapping ends (that would not otherwise bond with each other) of a cylindrical separator. The polymeric seal would thus bond the two ends together under a controlled heating condition, and form a seal. A suitably shaped polymeric layer can also be laminated or coated onto either side of a separator to be installed into a button cell, such that the polymeric material seals the outer periphery of the separator during a controlled heating condition.
The use of ultrasonic vibration to fuse the material to itself or another material has been found effective in producing a good seal in (for example) PVA films.
A third method for forming a seal is to apply hot wax, or epoxy resin, or other glue type sealant to the seams. An important aspect is that the materials used here (wax or epoxy) be resistant to the highly alkaline environment of the battery and maintain their sealing characteristics.
Alternatively, seamless separator tubes using a variety of polymer processing methods such as extrusion, injection molding, or blow moulding/blown films can be employed. Likewise, seamless tubes can be prepared by, e.g., completely coating a seamed material such as a fibrous material with a suitable separator forming polymer such as regenerated cellulose such that the seam is not present in the separator, but rather in the underlying material. It should be appreciated that the separator structures described herein may include any number of layers of the materials described above to more effectively limit the migration of the anode-fouling soluble species.
A still further alternative is to combine heat sealing and polymer cross-linking by coating or laminating a cross-linkable polymer with cross-linking agent onto a separator such as cellophane. The separator can be placed into position using conventional placement methods. Introduction of electrolyte alone or in the anode will cross-link the polymer to form a sealed separator.
It should be further appreciated that the positive and negative ends of the separator should also be desirably sealed in a manner sufficient to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling soluble species to the anode. Cylindrical cells typically include an annular grommet disposed proximal the negative cell terminal end that is compressed either axially or radially against the cathode and separator to prevent anode spillover. The negative end of the separator can abut and be sealed against the grommet by dispensing a polymer to the periphery of the separator at the negative end, and sealing the polymer against the grommet under controlled heating conditions. A chemical bond including cross-linking may also be used to create a seal. The negative end of the separator can also be mechanically sealed using a grommet or the like with an appropriately designed separator lock. Alternatively, a physical seal can be applied to the upper end of the zinc anode to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling soluble species to the anode. The negative end can also be sealed by using a disk shaped cap coated with a cross-linkable polymer which will seal against the seam and bottom-sealed cylindrical separator tube when the polymer is cross-linked. Alternatively, the top surface and edge of the cathode may be covered by appropriate cross-linkable polymers or polymer gels to effectively limit migration of anode-fouling soluble species. Alternatively, the top surface of the anode may be covered by appropriate cross-linkable polymers or polymer gels to effectively limit migration of anode-fouling soluble species from the cathode.
In a fourth method, a side seal can be fabricated using a mandrel and shoe set-up and ultrasonically fusing the material to form a side (seam) seal. A cut piece of PVA film is wrapped around the mandrel and held captive by the shoe. Sufficient film over-wrap is maintained for processing purposes, and a seal overlap of approximately 3 mm is targeted. The mandrel/shoe set-up is placed onto a speed-programmable slide, which is in turn mounted to a spring-loaded plate. The slide and plate are then placed under an ultrasonic welding horn, operating desirably between 20 kHz and 40 kHz. The force that the plate exerts between the horn and the PVA film on the mandrel (desirably 3-10 lbf, alternatively 4-7 lbf, or alternatively 5-6 lbf) is adjustable by using springs with different spring constants. The quality of the welded seam is dependent upon the speed of the slide, the pressure of the film against the horn, the amplitude of the welder, and the moisture content/temperature of the film during the welding process. Moisture content at 21 C is desirably 1-25%, alternatively 3-10%, and alternatively still 5-7%. When welding is complete, the final tube should be a continuously sealed cylinder substantially devoid of porosity (in excess of that of the base film material) caused by either insufficient or excessive heating derived from ultrasonic welding (
In order to create a sealed separator tube or bag, at least a portion of an end of the fully side-sealed cylinder should be sealed. Using an impulse heat-sealing apparatus (Fuji FS-315), at least a portion of an end of the cylinder is sealed in a line substantially perpendicular to that of the side seal (
The creation of a sealed tube substantially free of leaks is desirable to provide a suitably operable cell. A qualitative test is used to determine seal quality in the following manner. A hollow tube with an outer diameter (OD) that is undersized from the PVA bag inner diameter (ID) by about 0.005″ is connected to a gas supply (preferably Argon or Nitrogen). A PVA bag, which is significantly taller than the height required for the cylindrical cell, is inserted onto the hollow tube so that the total height of the bag to be installed in the cell is still below the bottom of hollow tube. An elastomeric O-ring is then placed over the PVA bag in such a manner as to seal the bag against the hollow tube. A gas pressure of 2-3 psig is supplied to the tube, and sufficient time is allowed for the bag to fill with gas and reach an ultimate pressure of 2-3 psig. Once the bag is inflated (without any dimensional deformation to the PVA bag) it is inserted into a bath of EtOH (95.2%, Fisher Scientific, located in Pittsburgh, Pa.) and the presence of gas bubbling through the EtOH is indicative of a leak in the sealed bag and will render the bag unusable.
Finally, diffusion of anode-fouling soluble species may be effectively limited when a suitable separator is configured as described herein. Simple experiments can be performed to screen various sample materials directly in button cells or other test vehicles and monitor the open circuit voltage (OCV) over time. A decay in OCV is an indicator of a change in the surface of one of the electrodes, most likely the result of migration of an anode-fouling soluble species, since all other components in the cell are known to typically not cause OCV decay. For more quantitative separator material screening and selection as well as to evaluate improvements and/or modifications made to a particular material, an “out-of-cell” test (such as the Exclusion Test described herein) in a specially designed fixture is more desirable. The Exclusion Test was performed as follows to determine suitability of separator materials or to determine the efficacy of a seal.
A glass tube was provided having a first end (Side A) and a second end (Side B) divided by two L-shaped O-ring seal joints with an o-ring size of −112 (Ace Glass, located in Vineland, N.J.). The separator or sealed seam of the separator sample was placed in the center of the tube, between the O-ring seal joints. Side A of the glass tube was filled with 10 mL of 34 wt. % KOH containing a mixture of 0.25 g CuO and 0.25 g of CuS. This ensured that there was a constant supply of soluble copper and sulfur species in the bulk solution substantially close to the equilibrium concentration under those conditions for the duration of the experiment. Side B was filled with 10 mL of 34 wt. % of KOH substantially free of CuO, CuS, or a mixture of CuO and CuS. The use of CuO and CuS particles was selected over the use of a known concentration of the soluble copper and sulfur species in side A because it also more closely mimics the conditions prevailing in a battery containing the solid cathode materials in electrolyte. For silver exclusion experiments, 0.25 g of AgO was utilized in Side A. The difference between the concentrations of the species on side A vs. side B provided an Exclusion Value, which is a measure of the ability of the separator to effectively limit migration of anode-fouling soluble species through the separator. When starting with un-dissolved materials like CuO or CuS powders placed in KOH in side A of the glass tube, the experiment will also indicate the solubility of the soluble species from the undissolved materials. A high concentration of KOH (e.g. 34 wt. %) is desirable, to ensure rapid and significant solubility of the anode-fouling soluble species. The above-described experiment was performed at 60° C. for 5 days.
A. Button Cell Tests:
A 357 size button cell is provided including the separator to be tested. The cathode includes 92% active material, 5% graphite, 2.5% electrolyte, and 0.5% polyethylene binder. The anode includes 68% sieved zinc with 31.25% 34-2 electrolyte and 0.75% of a combination of gelling agents and corrosion inhibitors. The cell was stored in an oven at a temperature of 60 C. Cell open circuit voltage (OCV), impedance, and cell expansion was monitored. Cell impedance was measured using a frequency response analyzer (e.g. Model 12 from Schlumberger Inc.). Reduction in OCV implies the potential of one or both electrodes is deteriorating from its thermodynamic value, and indicates that anode-fouling soluble species are migrating through the separator. Increase in cell impedance implies increase in the resistance between the two electrodes, which may also be caused by blocking of the separator or passivation of the Zinc anode surface by the diffusing or migrating anode-fouling species. Cell expansion is a sign of internal pressure build-up from gas generation, which is also an expected result if copper ions migrate through the separator and come in contact with the zinc anode. Expansion can be measured by monitoring the external height increase over time, of the assembled cell. Hence monitoring these characteristics is very instructional in understanding and valuating the efficacy of a particular separator material or its seal quality, or to screen several candidate materials or combinations.
B. Exclusion Test:
A more quantitative method involves a direct measure of the concentration of the anode-fouling species on either side of the separator in question. The set up is stored at 60° C. in an oven for 5 days with the top of the glass tube sealed to limit electrolyte evaporation. The electrolyte on both sides is then analyzed for the specific ion concentrations as described herein.
When specific ion concentration on side B is less than the concentration on side A, the separator or seal is deemed effective in limiting the migration of anode-fouling soluble species. The results in Table 4 indicates the results of the exclusion test, as described in more detail herein.
Soluble Cu species were analyzed in KOH using standard inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analytical techniques utilizing a Thermo Iris Intrepid II (radial unit) supplied by Thermo Electron Corporation (Waltham, Mass.). Typically, samples were prepared using 1 g of electrolyte sample diluted to 50 ml with 10% nitric acid solution prior to analysis. Calibration curves consisted of three solutions: blank, 0.5 ppm, and 1 ppm where all solutions were 10% nitric acid. Copper is calibrated using a 1000 ppm Spex standard. Measurements for copper were made using the average of four wavelengths (223.0, 224.7, 324.7, 327.3). A Scandium internal standard was used in each sample and standard (20 ppm) measured.
Soluble sulfur species were analyzed in KOH using standard inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analytical techniques utilizing a Thermo Iris Intrepid II (radial unit) supplied by Thermo Electron Corporation (Waltham, Mass.). Typically, samples were prepared using 1 g of electrolyte sample diluted to 50 ml with 10% nitric acid solution. Normally an additional 5:50 or 10:50 dilution was made, which was measured by volume to provide suitable results in this technique. Calibration curves consisted of three solutions: blank, 0.5 ppm, and 1 ppm where all solutions were 10% nitric acid. Sulfur was calibrated using standards prepared from Spex SO4 (K2SO4 starting source) standard. Measurements for sulfur were made using the average of two wavelengths (180.7, 182.0). A Scandium internal standard was used in each sample and standard (20 ppm) measured.
It is also noted that plasticizers or processing aids used in manufacture of films such as polyvinyl alcohol can adversely affect the ability of the film to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling soluble species when used as a separator in a cell, and, as such, films prepared with substantial quantities of one or more plasticizers are disfavored. It is desirable that a film separator for use in accordance with the invention contain less than about 15% plasticizers by weight, alternatively, contain less than about 10% or less than about 5% plasticizers by weight. Particularly suitable film separators contain about 3% plasticizers by weight or less.
One possible separator is non cold-water soluble, non-crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol film separator comprising less than about 3% plasticizers by weight. Two such suitable polyvinyl alcohol films are M-1000 and M-2000 (Monosol).
Although a separator of the invention can be provided as described, the separator can optionally be coupled with (e.g., laminated or tacked to) a conventional non-woven fabric layer in an otherwise conventional manner.
The following Examples describe various embodiments of the present invention. Other embodiments within the scope of the appended claims will be apparent to a skilled artisan considering the specification or practice of the invention as described herein. It is intended that the specification, together with the Examples, be considered exemplary only, with the scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the claims, which follow the Examples.
This is an example that illustrates the efficacy of various separators' ability to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling soluble species. The OCV was compared for a plurality of 357 cells made with various separators both initially and after 1 day room temperature of storage. The cathode was CuO (commercially available from Aldrich), and the cell anode was a conventional alkaline Zn gel anode having conventional zinc and electrolyte concentrations.
In most cases, two layers of separator were used in the cell, one facing the cathode (“cathode side separator”), the other facing the anode (“anode side separator”). The OCV data presented below in Table 3 includes the average of two cells of the given cell type. It should be appreciated that a decrease in OCV indicates increased migration of anode-fouling soluble copper species into the anode.
As shown in Table 3, based on the deterioration in OCV, it is seen that the cellophane and the TiO2 filled HMWPE (high molecular weight polyethylene) membranes outperform the microporous-type membranes (e.g. Celgard 3407 PE, B10ab Nylon and Excellerator Alkaline PTFE, etc), indicating that they are more effective in limiting migration of anode-fouling copper species.
This is an example that illustrates the ability of various separators to effectively limit the migration of anode-fouling species. As explained elsewhere, Side A of the glass tube fixture was filled with 34% KOH having a known concentration of copper ions and electrolyte free of copper ions was added to compartment B. The concentration of complex copper ions on side B was measured after 1 week at room temperature.
Referring now to Table 4, the Exclusion Test was performed on various separators to determine the Exclusion Value of soluble copper, silver, and sulfur species after storage at a temperature of 60 C. Side A of the glass fixture was filled with 34% KOH solution with 0.25 g of CuO (copper oxide) and 0.25 g of CuS powder which produce the soluble copper and sulfur species concentrations shown in columns 2 and 4. For silver exclusion determination, 0.25 g of AgO was used in side A of the AgO was used in side A of the fixture to produce silver concentrations shown in column 6. The summary results are displayed below in Table 4.
The results of Table 4 above illustrate that multiple layers of a separator are more effective than a single layer of the same separator material in limiting the migration of soluble copper and sulfur species at 60C. The results also indicate suitability of PVA films in excluding soluble copper, silver, and sulfur species.
This is an example that illustrates the utility of effectively limiting the migration of anode-fouling soluble species in stored 357 size button cells. Referring now to
This is an example that illustrates the utility of a cell made from materials of the herein described invention. Referring now to
Example 4 thus shows that a combination of cellophane and hybrid separator is more effective in limiting the migration of soluble copper and sulfur species than 2 layers of SC 216 cellophane.
It should be appreciated that the hybrid separator layer used above was fabricated by cross-linking a 2% PVA in water solution with a 5% sodium borate solution on the surface of a F3T23 non-woven separator. The PVA loading in the hybrid separator was approximately 10 g/m2, and it had an air permeability in the dry state of 1800 Gurley seconds. The hybrid layer was placed on the anode gel side of the separator structure. The air permeability was determined using a Gurley Precision Instrument Tester described above.
This is an example that illustrates the utility of a cell made using separators and cathode materials of various aspects of the present invention. Referring now to
This is an example that illustrates the utility of a cell made to represent an aspect of the present invention. Referring to
This is an example that illustrates the utility of the separator and cathode materials described herein. Referring now to
This is an example that illustrates the effectiveness of limiting the migration of anode-fouling species in a cell made according to various aspects of the present invention. Referring now to
This example illustrates the effect of using an additive such as ZnO in the cathode to reduce the ability of the copper and sulfur species to foul the anode. Two 357 size button cells were constructed in a similar manner with the exception that the cathode of one button cell contained 2% ZnO blended with the cathode. The cathode mix was produced from a 1:1 M ratio of jet-milled CuO and as received CuS dry blended with KS4 graphite and ZnO additive such that the cathode composition was 95% actives, 3% graphite and 2% ZnO. The cathode composition for the cell without the ZnO additive was 95% actives and 5% KS4 graphite. The anode consisted of a 68% sieved BIP anode and the separator was a single ply of M 2000 PVA film. Both cells were discharged after a 7 day period of ambient storage. Both cells were exposed to an intermittent test regime involving a 12.5 mA current for 1 hour followed by open circuit rest, repeated 4 times per day. The results, shown in the Table 5 below demonstrate that the cell with 2% ZnO delivered 240 mA/g discharge capacity as compared to only 100 mAh/gm for the control cell with no ZnO. The results demonstrate the beneficial aspects of added ZnO on battery shelf life.
Referring to
This is an example that illustrates the method used to identify the relative melting points of PVA separator samples. Samples of separator material having a diameter of 0.11″ were prepared and preconditioned in 50% relative humidity atmospheric conditions for 24 hours. Also in an atmosphere of 50% relative humidity a sample pan was tared and the prepared sample was then inserted into the sample pan. The prepared sample was then weighed and the weight recorded. The sample lid was then crimped onto the pan. The sample container was inserted into a differential canning calorimeter (available from TA Instruments of New Castle, Del., Model QI00) which was used to evaluate the sample. The system was programmed to ramp at 5° C. per minute and to scan the temperature range from 30° C. to 300° C. The melting point of the material was determined by the first significant peak in the heat flow curve (W/g) as will be understood by one skilled in the art (See
This is an example that illustrates the method used to identify the relative pH value of the electrolyte retained in a separator. Samples of separator materials were preconditioned in dry atmospheric conditions (<I% RH) for a minimum of 24 hours. Samples were weighed to the nearest 0.0001 g. Monosol M2000, M1000, and M1030 PVA film were soaked in 10 ml of 34-0 KOH for 24 hours at 23° C. After soaking, the films were dipped in methanol to remove surface KOH and water and rinsed with methylene chloride to remove residual solvent. The samples with absorbed KOH were then allowed to evaporate the residual methylene chloride by standing at 23° C. for 5 minutes and the weights were recorded to 0.0001 g. The film was then digested in 25 mL of deionized water at 70° C. until dissolved. The pH was recorded along with the temperature of the solution during measurement. The pH at 23° C. of retained electrolyte within each film was calculated using solution pH and temperature data using standard chemical calculation methods. Control samples were run using duplicates of the materials being tested but exposing them to only pH 7 de-ionized water solution. Variation from pH 7 was compensated (added or subtracted) from the corresponding sample to yield the normalized pH of the electrolyte retained within the sample separator. Table 6 shows that in separators that demonstrate adequate Exclusion Values, the pH values of the retained electrolyte in these separators are lower than the pH values in the bulk electrolyte.
In view of the above, it will be seen that the several advantages of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results attained. As various changes could be made in the above processes and composites without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/914,934 filed Aug. 9, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,645,540, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/493,695 filed Aug. 8, 2003, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/528,414 filed Dec. 10, 2003, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/577,292 filed Jun. 4, 2004, the disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in their entirety herein.
The U.S. Government has a pre-paid license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of Contract No. 99128200.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 274110 | De Lalande et al. | Mar 1883 | A |
| 430279 | Edison | Jun 1890 | A |
| 479887 | De Lalande | Aug 1892 | A |
| 519330 | Hertel | May 1894 | A |
| 533078 | O'Toole | Jan 1895 | A |
| 555304 | Crowdus | Feb 1896 | A |
| 684204 | Edison | Jan 1901 | A |
| 762425 | Lord | Jun 1904 | A |
| 871214 | Edison | Nov 1907 | A |
| 1134093 | Bauer | Apr 1915 | A |
| 1255283 | Benner et al. | Feb 1918 | A |
| 1282057 | Erwin | Oct 1918 | A |
| 2457948 | Thomas | Jan 1919 | A |
| 1316760 | Benner et al. | Oct 1919 | A |
| 1316761 | Benner et al. | Oct 1919 | A |
| 1375647 | Benner et al. | Apr 1921 | A |
| 1378549 | Manchester et al. | May 1921 | A |
| 1415860 | Benner et al. | May 1922 | A |
| 1434469 | Wilker | Nov 1922 | A |
| 1437287 | Willis | Nov 1922 | A |
| 1438086 | Benner et al. | Dec 1922 | A |
| 1450004 | Martus | Mar 1923 | A |
| 1486955 | Dunham | Mar 1924 | A |
| 1564741 | Wolfe | Dec 1925 | A |
| 1579558 | Martus et al. | Apr 1926 | A |
| 1599121 | Edison | Sep 1926 | A |
| 1602402 | Flath | Oct 1926 | A |
| 1624460 | Armstrong | Apr 1927 | A |
| 1624845 | Nyberg | Apr 1927 | A |
| 1637446 | Hendry | Aug 1927 | A |
| 1644344 | Martus et al. | Oct 1927 | A |
| 1644389 | Martus et al. | Oct 1927 | A |
| 1657543 | Lynn | Jan 1928 | A |
| 1706895 | Martus et al. | Mar 1929 | A |
| 1711462 | Wescott | Apr 1929 | A |
| 1725716 | Martus et al. | Aug 1929 | A |
| 1784592 | Heise et al. | Dec 1930 | A |
| 1786945 | Hendry | Dec 1930 | A |
| 1815508 | Heise | Jul 1931 | A |
| 1830234 | Martus et al. | Nov 1931 | A |
| 1831460 | Martus et al. | Nov 1931 | A |
| 1835867 | Heise | Dec 1931 | A |
| 1835868 | Heise | Dec 1931 | A |
| 1836720 | Martus et al. | Dec 1931 | A |
| 1855917 | Martus | Apr 1932 | A |
| 1863791 | Heise | Jun 1932 | A |
| 1864652 | Heise | Jul 1932 | A |
| 1920151 | Ruben | Jul 1933 | A |
| 1932654 | Dunham | Oct 1933 | A |
| 1936792 | Kahler | Nov 1933 | A |
| 1941869 | Martus et al. | Jan 1934 | A |
| 2048804 | Martus et al. | Jul 1936 | A |
| 2077561 | Heise | Apr 1937 | A |
| 2157072 | Eddy | May 1939 | A |
| 2175885 | Eddy | Oct 1939 | A |
| 2189463 | Eddy | Feb 1940 | A |
| 2233593 | Eddy et al. | Mar 1941 | A |
| 2269040 | Rublee | Jan 1942 | A |
| 2369033 | Eubank | Feb 1945 | A |
| 2390574 | Dunham et al. | Dec 1945 | A |
| 2422045 | Ruben | Jun 1947 | A |
| 2422046 | Ruben | Jun 1947 | A |
| 2441481 | Garrity | May 1948 | A |
| 2450472 | Dunham et al. | Oct 1948 | A |
| 2458878 | Ruben | Jan 1949 | A |
| 2463565 | Ruben | Mar 1949 | A |
| 2473546 | Ruben | Jun 1949 | A |
| 2481539 | Ruben | Sep 1949 | A |
| 2502723 | Harriss | Apr 1950 | A |
| 2509249 | Rhodes | May 1950 | A |
| 2526692 | Ruben | Oct 1950 | A |
| 2527576 | Ruben | Oct 1950 | A |
| 2542574 | Ruben | Feb 1951 | A |
| 2562215 | Ruben | Jul 1951 | A |
| 2594714 | Andre | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2612534 | Blake | Sep 1952 | A |
| 2635127 | Yardney et al. | Apr 1953 | A |
| 2650945 | Herbert | Sep 1953 | A |
| 2670395 | Audubert | Feb 1954 | A |
| 2679546 | Eisen | May 1954 | A |
| 2692215 | Ruben | Oct 1954 | A |
| 2701272 | Reiner | Feb 1955 | A |
| 2768229 | Herbert | Oct 1956 | A |
| 2786088 | Robinson | Mar 1957 | A |
| 2788383 | Robinson | Apr 1957 | A |
| 2809225 | Morehouse et al. | Oct 1957 | A |
| 2829186 | Kort | Apr 1958 | A |
| 2829189 | Coleman et al. | Apr 1958 | A |
| 2859266 | Garvey et al. | Nov 1958 | A |
| 2859267 | Garvey et al. | Nov 1958 | A |
| 2902530 | Eisen | Sep 1959 | A |
| 2942050 | Denes et al. | Jun 1960 | A |
| 2969413 | Peters | Jan 1961 | A |
| 2981782 | Warren et al. | Apr 1961 | A |
| 2991412 | Kordesch | Jul 1961 | A |
| 2993946 | Lozier | Jul 1961 | A |
| 3003015 | Duddy | Oct 1961 | A |
| 3016413 | Pasquale et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
| 3042732 | Kordesch | Jul 1962 | A |
| 3043896 | Herbert et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
| 3048645 | Ruben | Aug 1962 | A |
| 3056849 | Warren et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3060255 | Lozier | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3100163 | Lyons, Jr. | Aug 1963 | A |
| 3100164 | Solomon et al. | Aug 1963 | A |
| 3114659 | Warren | Dec 1963 | A |
| 3121029 | Duddy | Feb 1964 | A |
| 3154435 | Kitagawa et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
| 3158798 | Sauder | Nov 1964 | A |
| 3170820 | Drengler et al. | Feb 1965 | A |
| 3189486 | Pryor et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
| 3205096 | Honer et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3207630 | Solomon et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3207633 | Meltzer et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3214299 | Balaguer | Oct 1965 | A |
| 3236690 | Booe et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3240688 | Pryor et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3258415 | Kordesch | Jun 1966 | A |
| 3266936 | Krebs | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3269869 | Mendelsohn | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3287164 | Arrance | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3287166 | Arrance | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3303054 | Gruber et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3316159 | Louzos et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
| 3317349 | Elliott et al. | May 1967 | A |
| 3330701 | McElhill et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3335031 | Kordesch | Aug 1967 | A |
| 3355329 | Wilke | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3368924 | Benderly et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
| 3368952 | Pryor et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
| 3368958 | Pryor et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
| 3415688 | Foucry et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3433679 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3440110 | Arbter | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3441445 | Ehrlich et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3466195 | Spellman et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3468710 | Krasnow et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3484295 | Dawson | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3537397 | Ripley et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3597276 | Jammet | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3607403 | Arrance | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3615858 | Soto-Krebs | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3617387 | Grulke et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3647542 | Berger | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3652339 | Grulke | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3655450 | Soto-Krebs | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3663182 | Hamling | May 1972 | A |
| 3671319 | Arrange | May 1972 | A |
| 3679489 | Jammet | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3740271 | Jammet et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3749608 | Sarbacher | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3757793 | Fester et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3796606 | Lehmann et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3802923 | Spanur | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3839092 | Hausler et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3847674 | Kegelman | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3853630 | Hausler et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3864171 | Mills et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3865631 | Clayman | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3880672 | Megahed et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3884721 | Tucholski | May 1975 | A |
| 3894889 | Gillman et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3897265 | Auborn | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3907598 | Megahed | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3923550 | von Krusenstiema | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3951687 | Takamura et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3953238 | Honer | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3953241 | Langer et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3990917 | Clayman | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4015055 | Langan et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4018970 | Jumel et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4025698 | von Krusenstiema | May 1977 | A |
| 4037033 | Takamura et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4054727 | O'Nan et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4060676 | Dey et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4084047 | Himy et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4091181 | Merritt, Jr. | May 1978 | A |
| 4104420 | Jordan et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4105480 | Sterling et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4146681 | Spanur | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4154912 | Philipp et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4218275 | Kadija et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4218280 | Philipp et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4230549 | D'Agostino et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4262067 | Philipp et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4272470 | Hsu et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4277572 | Fujiwara et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4309493 | Kuhl et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4327157 | Himy et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4331746 | Sheibley | May 1982 | A |
| 4350610 | Jung et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4357402 | Sheibley et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4361632 | Weber et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4371596 | Sheibley | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4438185 | Taskier | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4440838 | Schmidt | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4487822 | Ruben | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4490448 | Williamson, III | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4505998 | Hsu et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4579791 | Wang | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4604335 | Johnson | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4734344 | Choi | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4767687 | LaBonte | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4812145 | LaBonte | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4833050 | Whitney et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4937154 | Moses et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4965147 | Mas et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5019467 | Fujiwara | May 1991 | A |
| 5075958 | Kelemen et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5077150 | Yoneda | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5122375 | Sklarchuck et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5154731 | Winger | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5164274 | Kordesch et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5208120 | Winger | May 1993 | A |
| 5219685 | Taniguchi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5221453 | Crespi | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5268243 | Noda et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5283139 | Newman et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5290645 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5298348 | Kung | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5366832 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5389471 | Kung | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5422185 | Egami et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5478669 | Flack | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5482798 | Mototani et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5516604 | Mieczkowska et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5543249 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5554460 | Wu et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5565688 | Hayashi | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5614331 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616437 | Gao | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5631102 | Spillman et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5639577 | Takeuchi et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5656393 | Boer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5667910 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5674369 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5716422 | Muffoletto et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5716734 | Nakano | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5742070 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5744014 | Gordon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5753389 | Gan et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5776635 | Gan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5814419 | Kenyon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5861213 | Ohmory et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5902696 | Smesko et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5935728 | Spillman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5952124 | Kainthla et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965291 | Pyszczek | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6027827 | Gan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033806 | Sugiura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040088 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6060184 | Gan et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6063526 | Gan et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6068950 | Gan et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6096447 | Gan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6096453 | Grunwald | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099987 | Daniel-Ivad et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110622 | Frysz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6124058 | Ohmory et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6153337 | Carlson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6159634 | Yen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6174622 | Thiebolt, III et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177210 | Lonsberry | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177213 | Fetcenko et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6180281 | Schneider et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183901 | Ying et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194098 | Ying et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6200706 | Ashida et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203941 | Reichert et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6207324 | Licht | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6248478 | Friend et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251536 | Janmey | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6261721 | Andrieu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6274269 | Gan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6284410 | Durkot et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6300004 | Tucholski | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306545 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6312850 | Janmey | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6332900 | Muffoletto et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6368365 | Chi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6368745 | Malay | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6399243 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6403256 | Gan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6410182 | Ying et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6423444 | Ying et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6444360 | Gan et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6444364 | Harris et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451486 | Davis et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6465129 | Xu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6472103 | Durkot et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6489056 | Davis et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6489057 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6495292 | Yen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503658 | Klein et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6503659 | Ovshinsky et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6511772 | Gan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6511774 | Tsukuda et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6514637 | Treger et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6521378 | Durkot et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6528207 | Gan et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6537698 | Gan et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6541160 | Cheiky et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6551747 | Gan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6562515 | Gan et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6586134 | Skoumpris | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6586135 | Gan et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6589612 | Cintra et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6593029 | Spillman et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6605385 | Gan et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6627337 | Gan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6656630 | Reichert et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6670074 | Spillman | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6670077 | Huang | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6677077 | Spillman et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6692865 | Gan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6692871 | Gan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6720108 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6730436 | Wang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6753109 | Nanjundaswamy et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6759166 | Wang et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6808847 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6828061 | Janmey | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 20010000485 | Ying et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
| 20010006751 | Gan et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010008733 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010009736 | Shiota et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010009741 | Durkot et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010016287 | Clough et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010024755 | Bahar et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010028976 | Treger et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010033953 | Gan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010038943 | Spillman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053475 | Ying et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020034685 | Sato et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020041997 | Muffoletto et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020061437 | Gan et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068220 | Wyler et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020071915 | Schubert et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020076611 | Palazzo | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020081492 | Gan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020090548 | Gan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020092155 | Carlson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020094479 | Gan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020094480 | Gan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020102465 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132167 | Gan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136947 | Spillman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136949 | Gan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136950 | Gan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136951 | Gan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136956 | Gan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142216 | Skoumpris | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020146505 | Fetcenko et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020155350 | Spillman | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020155352 | Durkot et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160263 | Corrigan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020164530 | Iwakura et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177036 | Faris | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020182511 | Cheiky et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197530 | Tani et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030017385 | Frustaci et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030017390 | Probst et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030017396 | Harigae et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030022062 | Wutz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030039887 | Yun et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030044686 | Bushong et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030068552 | Anglin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030079337 | Woodnorth et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030082443 | Janmey | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030087153 | Durkot et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030096171 | Thrasher et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030099881 | Bowden et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113632 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030118909 | Paulot et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030124427 | Takeuchi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134188 | Roy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134199 | Christian et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148181 | Wang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162098 | Gan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170537 | Randell | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203281 | Melzer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030207173 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211392 | Nanjundaswamy et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211394 | Tang | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228522 | Yang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030232248 | Iwanmoto et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040005501 | Naki et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040029005 | Leising et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038120 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145344 | Bushong et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040175613 | Eylem et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040197654 | Barker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224229 | Mansuetto et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229116 | Malinski et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050271941 | Bushong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0747983 | Dec 1996 | EP |
| 1149426 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 1519434 | Mar 2005 | EP |
| 2356286 | Jan 1978 | FR |
| 49109834 | Oct 1974 | JP |
| 55126961 | Oct 1980 | JP |
| 55130067 | Oct 1980 | JP |
| 56091369 | Jul 1981 | JP |
| 56093263 | Jul 1981 | JP |
| 56097967 | Aug 1981 | JP |
| 56116274 | Sep 1981 | JP |
| 56120069 | Sep 1981 | JP |
| 56132768 | Oct 1981 | JP |
| 57060665 | Apr 1982 | JP |
| 58064766 | Apr 1983 | JP |
| 58071561 | Apr 1983 | JP |
| 58082465 | May 1983 | JP |
| 58119159 | Jul 1983 | JP |
| 60221959 | Nov 1985 | JP |
| 60221960 | Nov 1985 | JP |
| 60262357 | Dec 1985 | JP |
| 62122057 | Jun 1987 | JP |
| 62291859 | Dec 1987 | JP |
| 62291860 | Dec 1987 | JP |
| 63148534 | Jun 1988 | JP |
| 01248460 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| 01248462 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| 01255162 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| 02267861 | Nov 1990 | JP |
| 07094162 | Apr 1995 | JP |
| 08213030 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 08273653 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 10275608 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| 11111256 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| 2000230075 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2003272615 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 9530248 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| 9934460 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 9934461 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 0041256 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| 0179706 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| 02101858 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 03009406 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| 03096448 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2004082093 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| 2004102699 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2005060026 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100112431 A1 | May 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60493695 | Aug 2003 | US | |
| 60528414 | Dec 2003 | US | |
| 60577292 | Jun 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10914934 | Aug 2004 | US |
| Child | 12582022 | US |
