Patent Application
20090129077
The present invention relates to a series connected light string and, more particularly to a series-connected LED light string with unidirectional shunts to ensure continuous but dimmed illumination of the light string in the event a bulb becomes inoperable or is missing.
One of the most common uses of series-connected light strings, particularly of the so-called “miniature” type, is for decoration and display purposes, particularly during Christmas time and other holidays, and more particularly for the decoration of Christmas trees, inside and outside of commercial, industrial and residential buildings, trees and shrubbery, and the like.
Probably the most popular light set currently available on the market, and in widespread use throughout the world, comprises one or more strings of 50 miniature light bulbs each, with each bulb typically having an operating voltage rating of 2.5 volts, and whose filaments are connected in an electrical series circuit arrangement. If overall strings of more than 50 bulbs are desired, the common practice is to provide a plurality of 50 miniature bulb strings, with the bulbs in each string connected in electrical series, and with the plurality of strings being connected in a parallel circuit arrangement with respect to each other. Other light strings on the market comprise 35 lights in series.
As each bulb of each string is connected in series, when a single bulb fails to illuminate for any reason, the whole string fails to light and it is very frustrating and time consuming to locate and replace a defective bulb or bulbs. Usually many bulbs have to be checked before finding the failed bulb. In fact, in many instances, the frustration and time-consuming efforts are so great as to cause one to completely discard and replace the string with a new string before they are even placed in use. The problem is even more compounded when multiple bulbs simultaneously fail to illuminate for multiple reasons, such as, for example, the existence of one or more faulty light bulbs, one or more unstable socket connections, or when one or more light bulbs physically fall from their respective sockets, and the like.
There are presently available in the market various devices and apparatuses for electrically testing an individual light bulb after it has been physically removed from its socket. An apparatus is also available on the market for testing series-connected Christmas tree light bulbs, and the like, by physically placing an alternating current line voltage sensor in close proximity to the particular light bulb desired to be tested. However, such a device is merely an electromagnetic field strength detection device which may remain in an “on” condition whenever the particular bulb desired to be tested is physically located in close proximity to another light bulb or bulbs on the Christmas tree.
In fact, light bulb manufacturers have also attempted to solve the problem of bad bulb detection by designing each light bulb in the string in a manner whereby the filament in each light bulb is shorted by various mechanisms and means whenever it burns out for any reason, thereby preventing an open circuit condition to be present in the socket of the burned-out bulb. However, in actual practice, it has been found that such short circuiting feature within the bulb does not always operate in the manner intended, resulting in the entire string going out whenever but a single bulb burns out.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,450,382 utilizes a single Zener or “avalanche” type diode which is electrically connected across each series-connected direct-current (“D.C.”) lamp bulb used by military vehicles operating on “steady state”—not pulsating—DC, strictly for so-called “burn-out” protection for the remaining bulbs whenever one or more bulbs burns out for some reason. It is stated therein that the use of either a single or a plurality of parallel and like-connected Zener diodes will not protect the lamps against normal failure caused by normal current flows, but-will protect against failures due to excessive current surges associated with the failure of associated lamps.
Various other attempts have heretofore been made to provide various types of shunts in parallel with the filament of each bulb, whereby the string will continue to be illuminated whenever a bulb has burned out, or otherwise provide for an open circuit condition.
Typical of such arrangements are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. Re. 34,717; 1,024,495; 2,072,337; 2,760,120; 3,639,805; 3,912,966; 4,450,382; 4,682,079; 4,727,449; 5,379,214; and 5,006,724, together with Swiss patent 427,021 and French patent 884,370.
Of the foregoing prior art patents, the Fleck '449, Harnden '966, and the Swiss '021 patents appear, at first blush, to probably be the most promising in the prior art in indicating defective bulbs in a string by the use of filament shunt circuits and/or devices of various types which range from polycrystalline materials, to powders, and to metal oxide varistors, and the like, which provide for continued current flow through the string, but at either a higher or a lower level. The reason for this is because of the fact that the voltage drop occurring across each prior art shunt is substantially a different value than the value of-the-voltage drop across the incandescent bulb during normal operation thereof.
Some of these prior art shunts cause a reduced current flow in the series string because of too high of a voltage drop occurring across the shunt when a bulb becomes inoperable, either due to an open filament, a faulty bulb, a faulty socket, or simply because the bulb is not mounted properly in the socket, or is entirely removed or falls from its respective socket. However, other shunt devices cause the opposite effect due to an undesired increase in current flow. For example, when the voltage dropped across a socket decreases, then a higher voltage is applied to all of the remaining bulbs in the string, which higher voltage results in higher current flow and a decreased life expectancy of the remaining bulbs in the string. Additionally, such higher voltage also results in increased light output from each of the remaining bulbs in the string, which may not be desirable in some instances. However, when the voltage dropped across a socket increases, then a lower voltage is applied to all of the remaining bulbs in the series connected string, which results in lesser current flow and a corresponding decrease in light output from each of the remaining bulbs in the string. Such undesirable effect occurs in most of the prior art attempts, including those which, at first blush, might be considered the most promising techniques, especially the proposed use of a diode in series with a bilateral switch in the Fleck '449 patent, or the proposed use of a metal oxide varistor in the above Harnden '966 patent, or the use of the proposed counter-connected rectifiers in the Swiss '021 patent.
For example, in the arrangement suggested in the above Fleck '449 patent, ten halogen filled bulbs, each having a minimum 12-volt operating rating, are utilized in a series circuit. The existence of a halogen gas in the envelope permits higher value current flow through the filament with the result that much brighter light is obtainable in a very small bulb size. Normally, when ten 12-volt halogen bulbs are connected in a series string, the whole string goes dark whenever a single bulb fails and does not indicate which bulb had failed. To remedy this undesirable effect, Fleck provided a bypass circuit across each halogen filled bulb which comprised a silicon bilateral voltage triggered switch in series with a diode which rectifies the alternating-current (“A.C.”) supply voltage and thereby permits current to flow through the bilateral switch only half of the time, i.e., only during each half cycle of the A.C. supply voltage. It is stated in Fleck that when a single bulb burns out, the remaining bulbs will have “diminished” light output because the diode will almost halve the effective voltage due to its blocking flow in one direction and conduction flow only in the opposite direction. Such substantially diminished light output will quite obviously call attention to the failed bulb, as well as avoid the application of a greater voltage, which would decrease the life of the remaining filaments. However, in actual practice, a drastic drop in brightness has been observed, i.e. a drop from approximately 314-lux illumination output to approximately 15-lux illumination output when one bulb “goes out”. Additionally, it is stated by the patentee that the foregoing procedure of replacing a burned out bulb involves the interruption of the application of the voltage source in order to allow the switch to open and to resume normal operation after the bulb has been replaced. (See column 2, lines 19-22 therein.) Additionally, as such an arrangement does not permit more that one bulb to be out at the same time, certain additional desirable special effects such as “twinkling”, and the like, obviously would not be possible.
In the arrangement suggested in Harnden '966 patent, Harnden proposes to utilize a polycrystalline metal oxide varistor as the shunting device, notwithstanding the fact that it is well known that metal oxide varistors are not designed to handle continuous current flow therethrough. Consequently, they are merely a so-called “one-shot” device for protective purposes, i.e. a transient voltage suppressor that is intended to absorb high frequency or rapid voltage spikes and thereby preventing such voltage spikes from doing damage to associated circuitry. They are designed for use as spike absorbers and are not designed to function as a voltage regulator or as a steady state current dissipation circuit. While metal oxide varistors may appear in some cases similar to back-to-back Zener diodes, they are not interchangeable and function very differently according to their particular use. In fact, the assignee of the Harnden '966 patent (originally General Electric Corporation, then later Harris Semiconductor, Inc.) states in their Application Note 9311: “They (i.e., metal oxide varistors) are exceptional at dissipating transient voltage spikes but they cannot dissipate continuous low level power.” In fact, they further state that their metal oxide varistors cannot be used as a voltage regulator as their function is to be used as a nonlinear impedance device. The only similarity that one can draw from metal oxide varistors and back-to-back Zener diodes is that they are both bidirectional; after that, the similarity ends.
In the Swiss '021 patent, Dyre discloses a bilateral shunt device having a breakdown voltage rating that, when exceeded, lowers the resistance thereof to 1 ohm, or less. This low value of resistance results in a substantial increase in the voltage being applied to the remaining bulbs even when only a single bulb is inoperative for any of the reasons previously stated. Thus, when multiple bulbs are inoperative, a still greater voltage is applied to the remaining bulbs, thereby again substantially increasing their illumination, and consequently, substantially shortening their life expectancy.
Even though the teachings of the foregoing prior art have been available for many years to those skilled in the art, none of such teachings, either singly or collectively, have found their way to commercial application. In fact, miniature Christmas tree type lights now rely solely upon a specially designed bulb, which is supposed to short out when becoming inoperative. Obviously, such a scheme is not always effective, particularly when a bulb is removed from its socket or becomes damaged in handling, etc. The extent of the extreme attempts made by others to absolutely keep the bulbs from falling from their sockets, includes the use of a locking groove formed on the inside circumference of the socket mating with a corresponding raised ridge formed on the base of the bulb base unit. While this particular locking technique apparently is very effective to keep bulbs from falling from their respective sockets, the replacement of defective bulbs by the average user is extremely difficult, if not sometimes impossible, without resorting to mechanical gripping devices which can actually destroy the bulb base unit or socket.
In Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 6,580,182, entitled SERIES CONNECTED LIGHT STRING WITH FILAMENT SHUNTING, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, there is disclosed and claimed therein various novel embodiments which very effectively solve the prior art failures in various new and improved ways. For example, there is disclosed therein a series string of incandescent light bulbs, each having a silicon type voltage regulating shunting device connected thereacross which has a predetermined voltage regulating value which is greater than the voltage normally applied to said bulbs, and which said shunt becomes fully conductive only when the peak voltage applied thereacross exceeds its said predetermined voltage switching value, which occurs whenever a bulb in the string either becomes inoperable for any reason whatsoever, even by being removed or falling from its respective socket, and which circuit arrangement provides for the continued flow of rated current through all of the remaining bulbs in the string, together with substantially unchanged illumination in light output from any of those remaining operative in the string even though a substantial number of total bulbs in the string are simultaneously inoperative for any combinations of the various reasons heretofore stated. There is disclosed therein various type of shunting devices performing the above desired end result, including back-to-back Zener, or so-called “avalanche” diodes, non-avalanche bilateral silicon switches, and conventional Zener diodes, one-half of which are electrically connected in one current flow direction and the remaining one-half being electrically connected in the opposite current flow direction.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,084,357, a series of rectifier diodes are connected in an array across lamp sockets to continue current flow in the event of a failure. This patent teaches the use of two arrays connected in parallel in opposite electrical directions to simulate counter-connected Zener diodes. U.S. Pat. No. 6,580,182 teaches the use of two counter-connected (back-to-back) Zener diodes across each lamp socket. Other patents teach the use of a single Zener diode as a shunt in an AC rectified DC circuit.
Applicant's U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,084,357; 6,580,182 & 6,765,313 are incorporated here in their entirety. While the circuits disclosed and claimed in those patents offer a vastly superior series connected light string with shunting which avoids much of the disadvantages of the prior art circuits noted above, a further simplified and less expensive circuit would, of course, be desirable. It would also be desirable to provide such a circuit for a LED light string.
It is therefore a principal object of the present invention to provide a simple and inexpensive, and yet highly effective, avalanche silicon type voltage regulating shunt, or bypass, for each of a plurality of series connected LED's, said shunt having a predetermined conductive switching value which is approximately the same or only slightly greater than the peak voltage applied to said LED's, and which shunt becomes conductive whenever such predetermined peak voltage is applied thereacross.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a new and improved series-connected LED light string which has even much greater desirable features than those previously available, and which utilizes a unique voltage regulating shunting circuit which is of very simple and economical construction and is relatively inexpensive to manufacture in mass quantities, thereby keeping the overall cost of the final product at a much lower cost than heretofore possible.
The present invention achieves the foregoing and other objectives by providing a new and improved series-connected string of LED's, operating on AC voltage, each having connected thereacross a voltage regulating shunting circuit which allows unidirectional current flow and regulates the voltage across an empty or otherwise inoperative socket. The voltage regulating shunting circuit of the present invention is advantageously capable of being mass produced by using conventional manufacturing techniques, and thus is one that is much more capable of being manufactured at the desired ultimate selling price of approximately one cent for each said shunting circuit, and thereby constituting a novel LED light string which is low in cost and very reliable.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description of exemplary embodiments provided below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
With reference to the schematic diagram in
The light string circuit of the present invention can be provided with other numbers of electrical sockets and bulbs, such as 50 electrical sockets and bulbs.
Operatively connected in electrical parallel across the electrical terminals of the first socket, hence the electrical terminals of first electric bulb 1, is a first voltage regulating device 51. Likewise, operatively connected in electrical parallel across the electrical terminals of the second socket, hence second electrical bulb 2, is a second voltage regulating device 52, and so on, until each of the remaining sockets, and hence each of remaining electrical bulbs 3 through 35 of the series has a corresponding one of voltage regulating devices 53 through 85 operatively connected in parallel thereacross.
For practical purposes, it is preferred that all of voltage regulating devices 51 through 85 are of identical construction and ideally comprise the electrical functional equivalent of a series of rectifier diodes connected in electrical series connection forming a unidirectional diode array or a simulated unidirectional diode array consisting of a rectifier diode in series with a Zener diode in the Zener direction. Therefore, with an operative electrical bulb missing in the corresponding socket, the peak voltage appearing thereacross is preferably approximately the same or slightly higher than the peak voltage rating of that supplied to the corresponding electrical bulb, when in the socket. Accordingly, when a particular bulb is missing from its socket, the voltage across that particular socket remains substantially unchanged on half of the AC cycle (as explained below) and, accordingly, the half-wave voltage across each remaining electrical bulb in the string remains substantially unchanged during half of the AC cycle.
In
The rectifier diodes A in each voltage regulating device 51-85 act to convert the normal AC voltage to a half-wave pulsating DC voltage. Thus, although the voltage regulating devices 51-85 still allow current to flow through the light string with very little change in the voltage drops across each electric bulb 1-35, the rectifier diode arrays 51-85 limit the frequency of current flow through the string of lights. Instead of operating on a normal continuous AC input, the rectifier diodes 51-85 result in a DC current that only operates approximately 50% of the time. As a result of the reduced frequency of current flow through the light string, the remaining electrical bulbs 1-35 have a noticeably dimmer output.
Another example of a light string 110 using such unidirectional shunts consists of 35 light emitting diodes (LED's) rated at approximately 3.5 to 4.0 volts connected in electrical series. For 120 volt input, a single Zener diode, used as a shunt device, would typically be rated at a Zener rating of around 4 volts. Thus, each two device shunt 151-185 across a respective one of 35 LED's 101-135 as shown in
As mentioned previously, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that different voltage rated LED's and a different number of LED's in the string can be utilized. Other LED's having different voltage ratings could be used with equal success and which would merely require a different number of LED's in the string operating at the same voltage supply which is currently available throughout the country. Of course, the voltage rating of the LED's will dictate the number of standard 1N4001 silicon diodes, or other rectifier diodes, in the series diode array shunt arrangement.
When an LED fails or is removed for any reason, in the above described invention, the illumination of the remaining LED's in the string is substantially unchanged.
Although the invention has been described in detail in connection with the exemplary embodiments, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the above disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alternations, substitutions, or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited by the foregoing description or drawings, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 12/141,842, filed Jun. 18, 2008, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/605,405, filed Nov. 29, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,391,161, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/832,622, filed on Jul. 21, 2006, and which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/954,225, filed Oct. 1, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,166,968, which is a continuation-in-part of application of Ser. No. 10/364,525, filed Feb. 12, 2003, now abandoned, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/061,223, filed Feb. 4, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,580,182, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/526,519, filed Mar. 16, 2000, abandoned, which is a division of application Ser. No. 08/896,278 filed Jul. 7, 1997, now abandoned, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/653,979, filed May 28, 1996, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/560,472, filed Nov. 17, 1995, now abandoned which, in turn, is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/494,725, filed Jun. 26, 1995, now abandoned.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60832622 | Jul 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 08896278 | Jul 1997 | US |
| Child | 09526519 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10061223 | Feb 2002 | US |
| Child | 10364525 | US | |
| Parent | 09526519 | Mar 2000 | US |
| Child | 10061223 | US | |
| Parent | 08653979 | May 1996 | US |
| Child | 08896278 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12141842 | Jun 2008 | US |
| Child | 12358065 | US | |
| Parent | 11605405 | Nov 2006 | US |
| Child | 12141842 | US | |
| Parent | 10954225 | Oct 2004 | US |
| Child | 11605405 | US | |
| Parent | 10364525 | Feb 2003 | US |
| Child | 10954225 | US | |
| Parent | 08560472 | Nov 1995 | US |
| Child | 08653979 | US | |
| Parent | 08494725 | Jun 1995 | US |
| Child | 08560472 | US |
