Solid state lighting devices such as, for example, light emitting diodes (LED's) are used for a number of applications. One type of such solid state lighting device is disclosed in International Patent Application No. PCT/US03/14625, filed May 28, 2003, entitled High Efficiency Solid-State Light Source And Methods Of Use And Manufacture, the details of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
There are numerous applications where a long string of devices, such as, for example, LED's, need to be connected electrically. Such strings present unique problems for the electrical engineer. On the one hand, there is a desire to string the components in series so that the current from one component flows directly through the next component. This is a desired configuration because it minimizes the amount of electrical current required while increasing the total voltage required across all the components. Since high currents are more difficult to deal with because high currents require large gauge wires, for example, it is desired to have lower currents and higher voltages.
However, stringing the components together in series presents a problem because if one of the components in the string fails, it will result in the failure of the entire string. For example, in a string of holiday lights wired in series, if one light fails the entire string also fails. To overcome this problem, holiday string lights are typically wired in parallel so that when one light fails the rest of the lights in the string continue to operate. However, such wiring requires higher current and lower voltage.
Wiring lights in series is preferred because the total current is lower and the operating voltage is higher. This presents a problem because if one light fails all lights in the series fail. Wiring lights in parallel overcomes this problem because when one light fails all other lights still operate. However, one undesirable aspect of wiring in parallel is that the total current is higher and the operating voltage is lower.
One prior art approach to this problem is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,980 (Marshall et al). This patent describes a circuit that has individual sensors for each light source and can determine if any given light source has failed. In the event of failure, the circuit shunts current around the failed component so that the rest of the components that are wired in series continue to receive electrical current. While such a circuit solves the problem of allowing serial connection (and, thus, higher voltage and lower current) the circuit itself is more complicated, expensive, and prone to possible failure, which defeats it's intended purpose.
What is needed is a light source that never fails or that at least has such a high reliability and mean time between failures that failure is something that effectively can never happen. Thus, the preferred solution changes from parallel wiring to series wiring forming a cascading series parallel circuit substantially reducing failures and mean time between failures. The parallel/series circuitry enables the selection of current and potentials that can accommodate the specific performance of solid state light sources in addition to complying with industry standards for different markets. These markets can be, but are not limited to industrial (high power), consumer (low power) and specialty markets as in the case of aerospace and medical markets.
The present invention provides a light source that is composed of an array of devices having a very large mean lifetime. The array is wired in a combination series and parallel circuit that ensures that the composite device will virtually never burn out. The light sources in the array of this invention are wired together in series without concern of the consequences of a module failure.
The array of this invention may include a composite of LED's that may number in the hundreds or about one thousand, for example. LED's are solid-state light sources with very long lifetimes that are measured in hundreds of thousands of hours. The array of this invention capitalizes on the lifetime of the LED's but also capitalizes on their low operating current and voltage to produce a composite array that is partly parallel and partly in series.
The light array of this invention includes a number of columns and rows of LED's. Each column includes a number of rows of plural LED's. The LED's in each row are wired in series and each column is wired in parallel so that if one LED fails only the LED's connected in series with the failed LED will also fail. The array may be connected in series with one or more LED arrays.
Another advantage of the present invention is that connecting the LED's in series provides all of the LED's in the series with the same amount of current so that the LED's have the same brightness.
This invention provides a lighting module comprising an array of LED's consisting of plural columns and rows, wherein each row of LED's in each column is connected in series and each column is connected in parallel. The LED array may be connected in series to one or more LED arrays. Each column in the LED array may contain at least one row of, for example, three LED's. Each column in the LED array may contain, for example, twenty-five rows of LED's. The LED array may contain, for example, thirteen columns.
This invention also provides novel circuits for driving LED's. In one embodiment, a circuit is provided that results in a high LED peak intensity without requiring more power input. In another embodiment, a circuit is provided for pulsing an array of LED's that results in very high current levels in the LED's without causing over-dissipation.
These and other embodiments are described in more detail in the following detailed descriptions and the figures. The foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive list of embodiments and features of the present invention. Persons skilled in the art are capable of appreciating other embodiments and features from the following detailed description in conjunction with the drawings.
Representative embodiments of the present invention are shown in
As shown in
In this example, the total voltage required to drive the LED array 10 is roughly three times the forward voltage drop across any given LED 12. The total current required to drive the LED array 10 is 13·25·XmA, where 13 is the number of columns 16 for each array 10, 25 is the number of rows 14 of LED's 12, and Xma is the nominal drive current required for each LED 12. For example, the LED 12 might have a nominal forward current of 20 mA at a forward voltage of between 3.6 and 4.0 volts. For example, the voltage and current for driving a single board populated with these LED's 12 may be 13·25·0.020A=6.5A and between 10.8-12 volts.
If all of the LED's 12 were wired in parallel, the required current would be three times higher, and the voltage three times lower. The configuration of
Each LED array 10 may be wired, preferably, in series to one or more other LED arrays to form a module as seen in
For example, one might want ten LED arrays 10. Wiring them in series requires (using the numbers from the above example) 6.5 amps at about 120 volts. This is roughly the electrical requirement of a domestic vacuum cleaner. By comparison, if the ten LED arrays were operated in parallel they would require 65 amps at about 12 volts, which is roughly the requirements of a light-duty arc welder. So, when wired in series the electrical requirements are far more tractable than when wired in parallel.
Thus, wiring in series results in lower current and higher voltage requirements. These requirements are more easily (cheaply and inexpensively) met by power supplies than having to provide higher current and lower voltage. However, as discussed above, series connections result in the entire string failing when any single component fails. This is such a significant disadvantage that in almost all cases the wiring is done in parallel and the consequent cost in high current and low voltage is simply absorbed by the consumer.
With the LED array of this invention, a light source is provided that is made of distributed devices having lifetimes of hundreds of thousands of hours. The array 10 itself is wired in a parallel/series combination that ensures that if one LED 12 fails, at most only two others fail with it, as shown in this example. This is a minor problem for an array with hundreds of LED's 12. Except for row 14 of LED's 12 wired in series, the columns 16 of LED's are wired in parallel, ensuring that the LED array 10 can virtually never fail. It is this extreme reliability that allows multiple LED arrays 10 to be strung together in series without regard for failure in any given array.
The number of rows 14, columns 16, and number of LED's 12 in each row 14 may vary depending on a number of factors such as, for example, the size of the array substrate.
An LED can be electrically modeled as a diode with a series resistance. Pulsing the LED in the manner described overcomes the series resistance and allows the current in the LED to be determined by the usual diode equation:
I=Is exp (V/kt),
where I is the current in the LED, Is is the saturation current, V is the voltage applied across the diode junction (not the LED), k is the Boltzman constant, and t is the absolute temperature.
It can be shown that very high currents are possible in an LED junction if the series resistance can be overcome by high-voltage pulsing means. Voltages across individual LED's can be in excess of 20 volts for a 3-volt junction voltage. The actual construction of the individual LED will determine how high the applied voltage can be before voltage breakdown occurs. As such, voltages considerably higher than a typical 3.3 volts may be applied to drive the LED's. Individual LED's may be pulsed with voltages of between 6-50 volts. However, voltages up to 150 volts may be applied to the LED's. It is also possible with this invention to pulse at least one LED up to 1,000 times its DC current value.
Persons skilled in the art will recognize that many modifications and variations are possible in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts and actions which have been described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of this invention and that such modifications and variations do not depart from the spirit and scope of the teachings and claims contained therein.
This invention claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/516,381, entitled “Series Wiring of Highly Reliable Light Sources,” filed Oct. 31, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in its entirety for all purposes.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2004/036046 | 10/29/2004 | WO | 00 | 4/27/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/043954 | 5/12/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3586959 | Eccles et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3936686 | Moore | Feb 1976 | A |
4011575 | Groves | Mar 1977 | A |
4118873 | Rothchild | Oct 1978 | A |
4435732 | Hyatt | Mar 1984 | A |
4530040 | Petterson | Jul 1985 | A |
4544642 | Maeda et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4595289 | Feldman et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4684801 | Carroll et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4685139 | Masuda et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4734714 | Takasu et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
5003357 | Kim et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5018853 | Hechel et al. | May 1991 | A |
5150623 | Woods | Sep 1992 | A |
5195102 | McLean et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5296724 | Ogata et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5397867 | Demeo | Mar 1995 | A |
5418384 | Yamana et al. | May 1995 | A |
5424544 | Shelton et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5436710 | Uchiyama | Jul 1995 | A |
5449926 | Holm et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5479029 | Uchida et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5490049 | Montalan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5522225 | Eskandari | Jun 1996 | A |
5554849 | Gates | Sep 1996 | A |
5555038 | Conway | Sep 1996 | A |
5623510 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632551 | Roney et al. | May 1997 | A |
5660461 | Ignatius et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661645 | Hochstein | Aug 1997 | A |
5698866 | Doiron et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5715270 | Zediker et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719589 | Norman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5806965 | Deese | Sep 1998 | A |
5857767 | Hochstein | Jan 1999 | A |
5877899 | Stern et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880828 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892579 | Elyasaf et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5910706 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5936353 | Triner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6033087 | Shozo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058012 | Cooper et al. | May 2000 | A |
6088185 | Ratliff et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6118383 | Hegyi | Sep 2000 | A |
6141040 | Toh | Oct 2000 | A |
6155699 | Miller et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160354 | Ruvinskiy et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163036 | Taninaka et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6200134 | Kovac et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222207 | Carter-Coman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6258618 | Lester | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273596 | Parkyn, Jr. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288497 | Chang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291839 | Lester | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299329 | Mui et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318886 | Stopa et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319425 | Tasaki et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328456 | Mize | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340868 | Lys et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6366017 | Antoniadis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367950 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375340 | Biebl et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419384 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420199 | Coman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424399 | Shimada et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441873 | Young | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6445124 | Asai et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459919 | Lys et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6498355 | Harrah et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525335 | Krames et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534791 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536923 | Merz | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547249 | Collins, III et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554451 | Keuper | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561640 | Young | May 2003 | B1 |
6561808 | Neuberger | May 2003 | B2 |
6573536 | Dry | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577332 | Osawa et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578986 | Swaris et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578989 | Osumi et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6607286 | West et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6630689 | Bhat et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6686581 | Verhoeckx et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6708501 | Ghoshal et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724473 | Leong et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6796698 | Sommers et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798152 | Rooke et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800500 | Coman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815724 | Dry | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822991 | Collins, III et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826059 | Bockle et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831303 | Dry | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836081 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6857767 | Matsui et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869635 | Kobayashi | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882331 | Wu | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6930870 | Nobe et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937754 | Eguchi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6992335 | Ohkawa | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995348 | Bradley et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009165 | Hehemann et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7071493 | Owen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7102172 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7179670 | Shelton et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20010002120 | Bessendorf | May 2001 | A1 |
20010030782 | Trezza | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010046652 | Ostler et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020151941 | Okawa et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020187454 | Melikechi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002282 | Swaris et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030038943 | Almarzouk et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030230765 | Dry | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000677 | Dry et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011457 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040026721 | Dry | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041521 | Mandler et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057873 | Yerazunis et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040090794 | Ollette et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113549 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119084 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134603 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135159 | Siegel | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141326 | Dry | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040166249 | Siegel | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040201988 | Allen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040206970 | Martin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040238111 | Siegel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018424 | Popovich | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050082673 | Fujiwara et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087750 | Braddell et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098299 | Goodson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050152146 | Owen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050218468 | Owen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230600 | Olson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231713 | Owen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050253252 | Owen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285129 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060216865 | Owen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070051964 | Owen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070109790 | Anderson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070154823 | Marson et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070278504 | Jasmin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8815418 | Feb 1989 | DE |
0560605 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0935145 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1158761 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1467416 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1469529 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2224374 | Aug 1988 | GB |
2396331 | Jun 2004 | GB |
2399162 | Sep 2004 | GB |
59035492 | Feb 1984 | JP |
404204333 | Nov 1990 | JP |
2003268042 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO9716679 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9854227 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO0037904 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0102846 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO0206723 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO0213231 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO0226270 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO02086972 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO2004009318 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004011848 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004038759 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2004078477 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2005043598 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2006072071 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070030678 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60516381 | Oct 2003 | US |