Series wiring of highly reliable light sources

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7524085
  • Patent Number
    7,524,085
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 29, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 28, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
The light array of this invention includes a number of columns and rows of LED's connected in a series/parallel combination. The series parallel combinations effectively optimize the impedance, accommodate failure rate, facilitate light mixing, provide a means of imbedding redundancy, and common cathodes or anodes. This arrangement provides a superior light source for consumer, industrial and specialty markets in respect to mean time between failure, process control, radiant intensity, wavelength mixing, power requirements and other characteristics of the light source. Each column includes a number of rows of plural LED's. The LED's in each row are wired in series and each column is wired in parallel so that if one LED fails only the LED's connected in series with the failed LED will also fail. There is redundancy in the circuit as well as the arrays so that if there are failures different current carrying elements or different series LEDS will automatically by powered on. The array may be connected in series with one or more LED arrays to form a module. Multiple modules may be connected in series with other multiple modules.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Solid state lighting devices such as, for example, light emitting diodes (LED's) are used for a number of applications. One type of such solid state lighting device is disclosed in International Patent Application No. PCT/US03/14625, filed May 28, 2003, entitled High Efficiency Solid-State Light Source And Methods Of Use And Manufacture, the details of which are hereby incorporated by reference.


There are numerous applications where a long string of devices, such as, for example, LED's, need to be connected electrically. Such strings present unique problems for the electrical engineer. On the one hand, there is a desire to string the components in series so that the current from one component flows directly through the next component. This is a desired configuration because it minimizes the amount of electrical current required while increasing the total voltage required across all the components. Since high currents are more difficult to deal with because high currents require large gauge wires, for example, it is desired to have lower currents and higher voltages.


However, stringing the components together in series presents a problem because if one of the components in the string fails, it will result in the failure of the entire string. For example, in a string of holiday lights wired in series, if one light fails the entire string also fails. To overcome this problem, holiday string lights are typically wired in parallel so that when one light fails the rest of the lights in the string continue to operate. However, such wiring requires higher current and lower voltage.


Wiring lights in series is preferred because the total current is lower and the operating voltage is higher. This presents a problem because if one light fails all lights in the series fail. Wiring lights in parallel overcomes this problem because when one light fails all other lights still operate. However, one undesirable aspect of wiring in parallel is that the total current is higher and the operating voltage is lower.


One prior art approach to this problem is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,980 (Marshall et al). This patent describes a circuit that has individual sensors for each light source and can determine if any given light source has failed. In the event of failure, the circuit shunts current around the failed component so that the rest of the components that are wired in series continue to receive electrical current. While such a circuit solves the problem of allowing serial connection (and, thus, higher voltage and lower current) the circuit itself is more complicated, expensive, and prone to possible failure, which defeats it's intended purpose.


What is needed is a light source that never fails or that at least has such a high reliability and mean time between failures that failure is something that effectively can never happen. Thus, the preferred solution changes from parallel wiring to series wiring forming a cascading series parallel circuit substantially reducing failures and mean time between failures. The parallel/series circuitry enables the selection of current and potentials that can accommodate the specific performance of solid state light sources in addition to complying with industry standards for different markets. These markets can be, but are not limited to industrial (high power), consumer (low power) and specialty markets as in the case of aerospace and medical markets.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a light source that is composed of an array of devices having a very large mean lifetime. The array is wired in a combination series and parallel circuit that ensures that the composite device will virtually never burn out. The light sources in the array of this invention are wired together in series without concern of the consequences of a module failure.


The array of this invention may include a composite of LED's that may number in the hundreds or about one thousand, for example. LED's are solid-state light sources with very long lifetimes that are measured in hundreds of thousands of hours. The array of this invention capitalizes on the lifetime of the LED's but also capitalizes on their low operating current and voltage to produce a composite array that is partly parallel and partly in series.


The light array of this invention includes a number of columns and rows of LED's. Each column includes a number of rows of plural LED's. The LED's in each row are wired in series and each column is wired in parallel so that if one LED fails only the LED's connected in series with the failed LED will also fail. The array may be connected in series with one or more LED arrays.


Another advantage of the present invention is that connecting the LED's in series provides all of the LED's in the series with the same amount of current so that the LED's have the same brightness.


This invention provides a lighting module comprising an array of LED's consisting of plural columns and rows, wherein each row of LED's in each column is connected in series and each column is connected in parallel. The LED array may be connected in series to one or more LED arrays. Each column in the LED array may contain at least one row of, for example, three LED's. Each column in the LED array may contain, for example, twenty-five rows of LED's. The LED array may contain, for example, thirteen columns.


This invention also provides novel circuits for driving LED's. In one embodiment, a circuit is provided that results in a high LED peak intensity without requiring more power input. In another embodiment, a circuit is provided for pulsing an array of LED's that results in very high current levels in the LED's without causing over-dissipation.


These and other embodiments are described in more detail in the following detailed descriptions and the figures. The foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive list of embodiments and features of the present invention. Persons skilled in the art are capable of appreciating other embodiments and features from the following detailed description in conjunction with the drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows an array of LED's that are wired both in series and in parallel.



FIG. 2 shows a module of plural arrays of LED's wired together.



FIG. 3 shows a full-wave bridge rectifier for directly driving a single string of LED's of FIGS. 1 and 2.



FIG. 4 shows a circuit for pulsing an array of LED's as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Representative embodiments of the present invention are shown in FIG. 1, wherein similar features share common reference numerals.


As shown in FIG. 1, an LED array 10 is shown that is wired in a series/parallel combination. The LED array 10 includes a plurality of individual LED's 12 mounted on a substrate 13 and arranged in rows 14 and columns 16. Each column 16 includes plural rows 14 of LED's 12 with, for example, three LED's 12 in each row 14. There may be, for example, twenty-five rows 14 in each column 16. The LED's 12 in each row 14 are wired in series and each column 16 is wired in parallel. Since the LED's 12 in each row 14 are wired in series it is ensured that if one LED 12 fails only the other LED's 12 in that series will fail also. The loss the LED's 12 in a single row 14 in the total array 10 has only a minimal impact on the total brightness of the array 10 since it consists of many LED's 12.


In this example, the total voltage required to drive the LED array 10 is roughly three times the forward voltage drop across any given LED 12. The total current required to drive the LED array 10 is 13·25·XmA, where 13 is the number of columns 16 for each array 10, 25 is the number of rows 14 of LED's 12, and Xma is the nominal drive current required for each LED 12. For example, the LED 12 might have a nominal forward current of 20 mA at a forward voltage of between 3.6 and 4.0 volts. For example, the voltage and current for driving a single board populated with these LED's 12 may be 13·25·0.020A=6.5A and between 10.8-12 volts.


If all of the LED's 12 were wired in parallel, the required current would be three times higher, and the voltage three times lower. The configuration of FIG. 1 provides an improvement in offering considerably lower current at higher voltage while at the same time producing an LED array 10 that has a virtually unlimited lifetime.


Each LED array 10 may be wired, preferably, in series to one or more other LED arrays to form a module as seen in FIG. 2. Multiple modules may be wired, preferably, in series to other multiple modules. However, because of the virtually unlimited lifetime of the LED array 10 the modules may be wired in parallel or in series without regard for concerns that one of the LED arrays might fail causing failure of the whole module.


For example, one might want ten LED arrays 10. Wiring them in series requires (using the numbers from the above example) 6.5 amps at about 120 volts. This is roughly the electrical requirement of a domestic vacuum cleaner. By comparison, if the ten LED arrays were operated in parallel they would require 65 amps at about 12 volts, which is roughly the requirements of a light-duty arc welder. So, when wired in series the electrical requirements are far more tractable than when wired in parallel.


Thus, wiring in series results in lower current and higher voltage requirements. These requirements are more easily (cheaply and inexpensively) met by power supplies than having to provide higher current and lower voltage. However, as discussed above, series connections result in the entire string failing when any single component fails. This is such a significant disadvantage that in almost all cases the wiring is done in parallel and the consequent cost in high current and low voltage is simply absorbed by the consumer.


With the LED array of this invention, a light source is provided that is made of distributed devices having lifetimes of hundreds of thousands of hours. The array 10 itself is wired in a parallel/series combination that ensures that if one LED 12 fails, at most only two others fail with it, as shown in this example. This is a minor problem for an array with hundreds of LED's 12. Except for row 14 of LED's 12 wired in series, the columns 16 of LED's are wired in parallel, ensuring that the LED array 10 can virtually never fail. It is this extreme reliability that allows multiple LED arrays 10 to be strung together in series without regard for failure in any given array.


The number of rows 14, columns 16, and number of LED's 12 in each row 14 may vary depending on a number of factors such as, for example, the size of the array substrate.



FIG. 3 shows a full-wave bridge rectifier for directly driving a single string of LED's as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. A resistor may be used to provide a limit on current. One novel feature of this circuit is that no filter capacitor is used. The LED string conducts only on the peaks of the pulsating-DC output of the rectifier. The LED current may be high, which may have an operational advantage in high peak light output, particularly for chemical processes. However, the duty cycle is limited. The result is a high LED peak intensity for the same power input. It is known that the human eye responds to the peak intensity of a light source. The scheme of FIG. 3 results in a visible light source of higher apparent brightness for a given power dissipation.



FIG. 4 shows a novel scheme for pulsing an array of LED's as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. In this scheme, an AC-DC supply (shown here as an off-line rectifier) is used to charge a low-ESR (equivalent series resistance) capacitor to a voltage much higher than the low-current operating voltage of the LED. A string of LED's is placed in series with a high-current MOSFET switch across this capacitor. If the MOSFET is switched to “ON” at a duty cycle equal to or lower than 5%, it is possible to create very high current levels in the LED's without causing over dissipation. Since the LED output is proportional to current in the LED, the resulting peak optical output of the LED is many times its DC value. This can have advantages both in visible and chemical systems applications.


An LED can be electrically modeled as a diode with a series resistance. Pulsing the LED in the manner described overcomes the series resistance and allows the current in the LED to be determined by the usual diode equation:

I=Is exp (V/kt),

where I is the current in the LED, Is is the saturation current, V is the voltage applied across the diode junction (not the LED), k is the Boltzman constant, and t is the absolute temperature.


It can be shown that very high currents are possible in an LED junction if the series resistance can be overcome by high-voltage pulsing means. Voltages across individual LED's can be in excess of 20 volts for a 3-volt junction voltage. The actual construction of the individual LED will determine how high the applied voltage can be before voltage breakdown occurs. As such, voltages considerably higher than a typical 3.3 volts may be applied to drive the LED's. Individual LED's may be pulsed with voltages of between 6-50 volts. However, voltages up to 150 volts may be applied to the LED's. It is also possible with this invention to pulse at least one LED up to 1,000 times its DC current value.


Persons skilled in the art will recognize that many modifications and variations are possible in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts and actions which have been described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of this invention and that such modifications and variations do not depart from the spirit and scope of the teachings and claims contained therein.

Claims
  • 1. A lighting device, comprising: an array of LEDs consisting of plural columns and rows, wherein each row of LEDs in each column is connected in series and each column is connected in parallel;a low equivalent series resistance capacitor electrically connected to the array of LEDs; anda metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) electrically connected in series with the array of LEDs, the MOSFET arranged to act as a switch to the capacitor.
  • 2. The lighting device of claim 1, wherein the LED array is connected in series to one or more LED arrays to form a module.
  • 3. The lighting device of claim 1, wherein each column in the LED array contains at least one row of one or more LED's.
  • 4. The lighting device of claim 3, wherein each column in the LED array contains at least two or more rows of LED's.
  • 5. The lighting device of claim 4, wherein the LED array contains at least two or more columns.
  • 6. The lighting device of claim 1, wherein the LED's connected in series are supplied with the same amount of current so that each LED emits the same brightness.
  • 7. The lighting device of claim 1, wherein each of the two or more LED's in each column is also supplied with the same amount of current so that each column emits the same brightness.
  • 8. The lighting device 3, wherein each module is connected in series to one or more modules.
  • 9. The lighting device 3, wherein each module is connected in parallel to one or more modules.
  • 10. A method of operating a lighting device, comprising: charging a capacitor to a voltage at least three times higher than an operating voltage of an LED using an input DC power level;periodically switching on a metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) to create a current in the LED; andgenerating a peak optical output int he LED, the peak optical output being a multiple of the DC power level and is generated while the MOSFET is on.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the charging further comprises using a full-wave bridge rectifier circuit.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein charging a capacitor comprises charging a low-ESR capacitor to a voltage that is substantially higher than the low-current operating voltage of the LED.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein periodically switching on a MOSFET comprises switching on a MOSFET placed in series with the LED.
Parent Case Info

This invention claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/516,381, entitled “Series Wiring of Highly Reliable Light Sources,” filed Oct. 31, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in its entirety for all purposes.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2004/036046 10/29/2004 WO 00 4/27/2006
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2005/043954 5/12/2005 WO A
US Referenced Citations (142)
Number Name Date Kind
3586959 Eccles et al. Jun 1971 A
3936686 Moore Feb 1976 A
4011575 Groves Mar 1977 A
4118873 Rothchild Oct 1978 A
4435732 Hyatt Mar 1984 A
4530040 Petterson Jul 1985 A
4544642 Maeda et al. Oct 1985 A
4595289 Feldman et al. Jun 1986 A
4684801 Carroll et al. Aug 1987 A
4685139 Masuda et al. Aug 1987 A
4734714 Takasu et al. Mar 1988 A
5003357 Kim et al. Mar 1991 A
5018853 Hechel et al. May 1991 A
5150623 Woods Sep 1992 A
5195102 McLean et al. Mar 1993 A
5296724 Ogata et al. Mar 1994 A
5397867 Demeo Mar 1995 A
5418384 Yamana et al. May 1995 A
5424544 Shelton et al. Jun 1995 A
5436710 Uchiyama Jul 1995 A
5449926 Holm et al. Sep 1995 A
5479029 Uchida et al. Dec 1995 A
5490049 Montalan et al. Feb 1996 A
5522225 Eskandari Jun 1996 A
5554849 Gates Sep 1996 A
5555038 Conway Sep 1996 A
5623510 Hamilton et al. Apr 1997 A
5632551 Roney et al. May 1997 A
5660461 Ignatius et al. Aug 1997 A
5661645 Hochstein Aug 1997 A
5698866 Doiron et al. Dec 1997 A
5715270 Zediker et al. Feb 1998 A
5719589 Norman et al. Feb 1998 A
5806965 Deese Sep 1998 A
5857767 Hochstein Jan 1999 A
5877899 Stern et al. Mar 1999 A
5880828 Nakamura et al. Mar 1999 A
5892579 Elyasaf et al. Apr 1999 A
5910706 Stevens et al. Jun 1999 A
5936353 Triner et al. Aug 1999 A
6033087 Shozo et al. Mar 2000 A
6058012 Cooper et al. May 2000 A
6088185 Ratliff et al. Jul 2000 A
6118383 Hegyi Sep 2000 A
6141040 Toh Oct 2000 A
6155699 Miller et al. Dec 2000 A
6160354 Ruvinskiy et al. Dec 2000 A
6163036 Taninaka et al. Dec 2000 A
6200134 Kovac et al. Mar 2001 B1
6222207 Carter-Coman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6258618 Lester Jul 2001 B1
6273596 Parkyn, Jr. Aug 2001 B1
6288497 Chang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291839 Lester Sep 2001 B1
6299329 Mui et al. Oct 2001 B1
6318886 Stopa et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319425 Tasaki et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328456 Mize Dec 2001 B1
6340868 Lys et al. Jan 2002 B1
6366017 Antoniadis et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367950 Yamada et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375340 Biebl et al. Apr 2002 B1
6419384 Lewis et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420199 Coman et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424399 Shimada et al. Jul 2002 B1
6441873 Young Aug 2002 B2
6445124 Asai et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459919 Lys et al. Oct 2002 B1
6498355 Harrah et al. Dec 2002 B1
6525335 Krames et al. Feb 2003 B1
6534791 Hayashi et al. Mar 2003 B1
6536923 Merz Mar 2003 B1
6547249 Collins, III et al. Apr 2003 B2
6554451 Keuper Apr 2003 B1
6561640 Young May 2003 B1
6561808 Neuberger May 2003 B2
6573536 Dry Jun 2003 B1
6577332 Osawa et al. Jun 2003 B2
6578986 Swaris et al. Jun 2003 B2
6578989 Osumi et al. Jun 2003 B2
6607286 West et al. Aug 2003 B2
6630689 Bhat et al. Oct 2003 B2
6686581 Verhoeckx et al. Feb 2004 B2
6708501 Ghoshal et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724473 Leong et al. Apr 2004 B2
6796698 Sommers et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798152 Rooke et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800500 Coman et al. Oct 2004 B2
6815724 Dry Nov 2004 B2
6822991 Collins, III et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826059 Bockle et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831303 Dry Dec 2004 B2
6836081 Swanson et al. Dec 2004 B2
6857767 Matsui et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869635 Kobayashi Mar 2005 B2
6882331 Wu Apr 2005 B2
6930870 Nobe et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937754 Eguchi Aug 2005 B1
6992335 Ohkawa Jan 2006 B2
6995348 Bradley et al. Feb 2006 B2
7009165 Hehemann et al. Mar 2006 B2
7071493 Owen et al. Jul 2006 B2
7102172 Lynch et al. Sep 2006 B2
7179670 Shelton et al. Feb 2007 B2
20010002120 Bessendorf May 2001 A1
20010030782 Trezza Oct 2001 A1
20010046652 Ostler et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020151941 Okawa et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020187454 Melikechi et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030002282 Swaris et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030038943 Almarzouk et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030230765 Dry Dec 2003 A1
20040000677 Dry et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040011457 Kobayashi et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040026721 Dry Feb 2004 A1
20040041521 Mandler et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040057873 Yerazunis et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040090794 Ollette et al. May 2004 A1
20040113549 Roberts et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040119084 Hsieh et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040134603 Kobayashi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040135159 Siegel Jul 2004 A1
20040141326 Dry Jul 2004 A1
20040166249 Siegel Aug 2004 A1
20040201988 Allen Oct 2004 A1
20040206970 Martin Oct 2004 A1
20040238111 Siegel Dec 2004 A1
20050018424 Popovich Jan 2005 A1
20050082673 Fujiwara et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050087750 Braddell et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050098299 Goodson et al. May 2005 A1
20050152146 Owen Jul 2005 A1
20050218468 Owen Oct 2005 A1
20050230600 Olson et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050231713 Owen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050253252 Owen et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050285129 Jackson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060216865 Owen et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070051964 Owen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070109790 Anderson et al. May 2007 A1
20070154823 Marson et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070278504 Jasmin et al. Dec 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
8815418 Feb 1989 DE
0560605 Mar 1993 EP
0935145 Aug 1999 EP
1158761 Nov 2001 EP
1467416 Oct 2004 EP
1469529 Oct 2004 EP
2224374 Aug 1988 GB
2396331 Jun 2004 GB
2399162 Sep 2004 GB
59035492 Feb 1984 JP
404204333 Nov 1990 JP
2003268042 Sep 2003 JP
WO9716679 May 1997 WO
WO9854227 Dec 1998 WO
WO0037904 Jun 2000 WO
WO0102846 Jan 2001 WO
WO0206723 Jan 2002 WO
WO0213231 Feb 2002 WO
WO0226270 Apr 2002 WO
WO02086972 Oct 2002 WO
WO2004009318 Jan 2004 WO
WO2004011848 Feb 2004 WO
WO2004038759 Jun 2004 WO
WO2004078477 Sep 2004 WO
WO2005043598 May 2005 WO
WO2006072071 Jul 2006 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070030678 A1 Feb 2007 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60516381 Oct 2003 US