Server connectivity control for tele-presence robot

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9381654
  • Patent Number
    9,381,654
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 14, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 5, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A robot system with a robot that has a camera and a remote control station that can connect to the robot. The connection can include a plurality of privileges. The system further includes a server that controls which privileges are provided to the remote control station. The privileges may include the ability to control the robot, joint in a multi-cast session and the reception of audio/video from the robot. The privileges can be established and edited through a manager control station. The server may contain a database that defines groups of remote control station that can be connected to groups of robots. The database can be edited to vary the stations and robots within a group. The system may also allow for connectivity between a remote control station at a user programmable time window.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The subject matter disclosed generally relates to the field of robotics.


2. Background Information


Robots have been used in a variety of applications ranging from remote control of hazardous material to assisting in the performance of surgery. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,762,458 issued to Wang et al. discloses a system that allows a surgeon to perform minimally invasive medical procedures through the use of robotically controlled instruments. One of the robotic arms in the Wang system moves an endoscope that has a camera. The camera allows a surgeon to view a surgical area of a patient.


There has been marketed a tele-presence mobile robot introduced by InTouch Technologies, Inc., the assignee of this application, under the trademark RP-7. The InTouch robot is controlled by a user at a remote station. The remote station may be a personal computer with a joystick that allows the user to remotely control the movement of the robot. Both the robot and remote station have cameras, monitors, speakers and microphones to allow for two-way video/audio communication. The robot camera provides video images to a screen at the remote station so that the user can view the robot's surroundings and move the robot accordingly.


The InTouch robot system can be used to access any number of robots from different remote locations. For example, a hospital facility may have a number of tele-presence robots that are accessible from different remote computer stations. A physician can become connected to a robot by merely logging on through a laptop or personal computer. As the number of in-field InTouch tele-presence robots grows, it is desirable to set and edit the connectivity between various remote control stations and different robots. It is also desirable to provide a means to control the parameters of the connectivity. For example, it may be desirable to control connectivity so that multiple remote control stations can receive the audio/video provided by the robot. It may be desirable to restrict the audio and/or video provided to one or more remote control stations. It may also be desirable to establish a time window of connectivity between control stations and robots.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A robot system with a robot that has a camera and a remote control station that can connect to the robot. The connection can include a plurality of privileges. The system further includes a server that controls which privileges are provided to the remote control station. The system may include a manager control station that can access said server to establish and edit said privileges.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an illustration of a robotic system;



FIG. 2 is an illustration of a user interface to create connectivity groups;



FIG. 3 is an illustration of a user interface to create connectivity rules;



FIG. 4 is an illustration of a user interface used to test connectivity between a remote control station and a robot;



FIG. 5 is an illustration of a user interface similar to FIG. 4 showing an error message;



FIG. 6 is a schematic of an electrical system of a robot;



FIG. 7 is side view of the robot;



FIG. 8 is a side view of a robot head.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed is a robot system with a robot that has a camera and a remote control station that can connect to the robot. The connection can include a plurality of privileges. The system further includes a server that controls which privileges are provided to the remote control station. The privileges may include the ability to control the robot, join in a multi-cast session and the reception of audio/video from the robot. The privileges can be established and edited through a manager control station.


The server may contain a database that defines groups of remote control stations that can be connected to groups of robots. The database can be edited to vary the stations and robots within a group. The system may also allow for connectivity between a remote control station and a robot within a user programmable time window. The system may also allow for connectivity between arbitrary endpoints, including control station to control station connections and robot to robot connections.


Referring to the drawings more particularly by reference numbers, FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of a robot system 10. The robot system 10 includes a plurality of robots 12 each with a base station 14 and a plurality of remote control stations 16. Each remote control station 16 may be coupled to the base station 14 through a network 18. By way of example, the network 18 may be either a packet switched network such as the Internet, or a circuit switched network such has a Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) or other broadband system. The base station 14 may be coupled to the network 18 by a modem 20 or other broadband network interface device.


Each remote control station 16 may include a computer 22 that has a monitor 24, a camera 26, a microphone 28 and a speaker 30. The computer 22 may also contain an input device 32 such as a joystick or a mouse. Each control station 16 is typically located in a place that is remote from the robot 12. Although only one robot 12 is shown, it is to be understood that the system 10 may have a plurality of robots 12. In general any number of robots 12 may be controlled by any number of remote stations. For example, one remote station 16 may be coupled to a plurality of robots 12, or one robot 12 may be coupled to a plurality of remote stations 16.


The robot 12 includes a movement platform 34 that is attached to a robot housing 36. Also attached to the robot housing 36 are a camera 38, a monitor 40, a microphone(s) 42 and a speaker 44. The microphone 42 and speaker 30 may create a stereophonic sound. The robot 12 may also have an antenna 46 that is wirelessly coupled to an antenna 48 of the base station 14. The system 10 allows a user at the remote control station 16 to move the robot 12 through the input device 32. The robot camera 38 is coupled to the remote monitor 24 so that a user at the remote station 16 can view a patient. Likewise, the robot monitor 40 is coupled to the remote camera 26 so that the patient can view the user. The microphones 28 and 42, and speakers 30 and 44, allow for audible communication between the patient and the user.


Each remote station computer 22 may operate Microsoft OS software and WINDOWS XP or other operating systems such as LINUX. The remote computer 22 may also operate a video driver, a camera driver, an audio driver and a joystick driver. The video images may be transmitted and received with compression software such as MPEG CODEC. The control station may have general user interfaces that allow for operation of a robot and for multi-casting with other remote stations.


The system 10 includes a server 50 that controls connectivity between the remote control stations 16 and the robots 12. The server 50 includes a database 52. By way of example, the database 52 may be a relational database. The database 52 can allow for groups of remote stations to connect groups of robots. Groups may contain individual robots and control stations. Groups may also contain customers, which represent all robots and control stations belonging to a particular customer. Groups may also contain OEM configurations, which represent all robots and control stations that are sold by a particular 3rd-party OEM distributor. Groups may also contain other groups in a recursive fashion. By way of example, one healthcare entity may have three robots designated ROBOT-1, ROBOT-2 and ROBOT-3 and 5 remote stations designated CS-1, CS-2, CS-3, CS-4 and CS-5. The 3 robots are defined as group R and the remote stations are defined as group S. Rules can be established that allow connectivity between any remote station in group S with any robot in group R.



FIG. 2 shows a user interface 60 that can be used to create and edit groups. The interface includes an “Add Members” field 62 that allows a user to add members to a group. The members can be selected through the “Clients” field 64, “Customers” field 66, “OEM” configuration field 68 or by a “Group” name field 70. The members of the new group are listed in the “Members” field 72. The members can be listed as a string of client serial numbers, customer ids, OEM configuration ids and group ids in a simple XML-like format. In this example, the group includes client control stations CS-2345 and CS-2346. The interface 60 may include an “Add This Group” button 74 that can be selected to add a group to the database.


The interface 60 may include an “Existing Groups” area 76 that allows the user to view existing groups and group members through fields 78 which filter based on the category of group name, OEM, customer or client. Interface area 80 lists each group along with the group members, the person who created the group (with time log), and an indication of whether the group is active. An existing group can be edited by selecting an “Edit” button 82. A history of edits can be viewed by selecting the “History” button 84.


The group data may be stored in the database with the following group connectivity information:

    • id [int, identity]: Unique numeric ID.
    • createID [int]: ID that is shared amongst all group edits in the history chain. This is used to locate the group history. For the initial group creation, the createID is equal to the regular id. All subsequent edits to the group will retain the same createID, but will be given new unique regular ids.
    • isActive[bit]: Set to true if group is currently considered active, meaning that it has not been edited and replaced by a new version of the group.
    • name [nvarchar]: Friendly name of group. This name appears in any group dropdowns in an advanced page.
    • members [text]: String of group members. Contains mixed client machines, customer names, OEM configurations and nested groups.
    • membersExpanded [text]: Stores members in an expanded format where all nested groups and OEMs are expanded to list all client machines and customers contained in the groups.
    • createdUTC[int]: Timestamp of initial group creation in UTC seconds. When a group is edited, the original group becomes inactive and a new group is created, but the createdUTC timestamp is maintained in the new group.
    • modifiedUTC[int]: Timestamp of most recent group modification in UTC seconds. For groups being made inactive due to a group edit, the newly inactive group will have its modified timestamp set to the time of the edit.
    • creator[nvarchar]: The user who first created the group. This can be automatically pulled from domain login credentials used to access the various UI pages.
    • lastModifiedBy[nvarchar]: The user who last modified the group. This can be automatically pulled from domain login credentials used to access the various UI pages.
    • comments[text]: Textual comments attached to group.



FIG. 3 is an interface 90 that can be used to create and edit connectivity rules. The interface 90 includes rule creation filter fields 92 that allow a user to filter the list of systems that appear in the client field when creating new rules. There are also fields 94 that allow the user to review existing rules. The connectivity path of a rule can be defined in fields 96 by adding groups, OEMs, customers, and individual robots and control stations to the “From” 98 and “To” 100 fields.


The rules include “From” 98 and “To” 100 fields that define the connectivity path between control stations and robots. The “Priority” field 102 defines how conflicting rules will be resolved. When rules are in conflict, the priority value resolves the ambiguity. If two conflicting rules have the same priority, the rule that was modified most recently wins. The “Privilege Level” field 104 establishes what privileges are allowed in this particular connectivity. By way of example, the system may allow the following privileges:

    • The ability to operate the robot.
    • The ability to accept multi-cast sessions with one or more other remote control stations.
    • The ability to be the Host (primary control station CS user) for a multi-cast session with one or more other remote control stations.
    • The ability to be a Guest CS in a multi-cast session with one or more other remote control stations.
    • The ability to connect directly to a robot (i.e. without being a Guest).
    • Disabling of all visible video output and/or audio output on a Guests system of what is captured on the robot.
    • Disabling video output and/or audio output on the robot of what is captured on one or more Guest control stations.
    • Disabling of saving of media including snapshots and movies from the robot.
    • Access to a medical device connected to the robot.
    • The ability to view and control auxiliary video sources.
    • The ability to use an external handset attached to the robot.


The “Type” field 106 allows the user to specify whether the rule is additive or subtractive. Additive rules can be used to add connectivity. Subtractive rules can be used to selectively remove connectivity in a targeted manner. In this fashion, if one defines the connectivity to or from a group, and then subtracts connectivity privileges of a sub-group, and further adds connectivity privileges of a sub-sub-group, the system thereby allows one to define a hierarchy of connectivity rules The “Bidirectional” field 108 allows for connectivity between the From and To members to be unidirectional (“False”) or bidirectional (“True”) which is selectable by the user. The user can set the rule as read-only in the “Read-Only” field 110. Read-only rules always appear at the top of the list when rules are displayed. They require special double confirmation to be edited or deleted.


The user can select a time window for connectivity by entering a start date and time in a “Start Time” field 112 and an end date and time in an “End Time” field 114. The rule can be added by selecting the “Add This Rule” button 116. This allows a user to schedule connectivity in advance, to be enabled at a later date and time.


The From, To, Priority, Privilege and Active data for existing rules can be displayed in an interface area 118. A user can edit an existing rule by selecting an “Edit” button 120 and review edit history by selecting a “History” button 122.


The rules can be stored in the relational database with the following connectivity rule information:

    • id [int, identity]: Unique numeric ID.
    • createID [int]: ID that is shared amongst all rules in the history chain that resulted from edits. This is used to locate the rule history. For the initial rule, the createID is equal to the regular id. All subsequent edits to the rule will retain the same createID, but will be given new unique regular ids.
    • priority [int]: Allows establishing precedence between conflicting rules by determining the order in which rules are applied. Higher numbers means the rule will be applied later in the logic chain.
    • groupFrom [text]: String of “from” group members. Contains mixed client machines, customers and groups. For non-bidirectional rules, this represents the source of connectivity, for bidirectional rules it represents both source and destination.
    • groupTo [text]: String of “to” group members. Contains mixed client machines, customers and groups. For non-bidirectional rules, this represents the destination of connectivity, for bidirectional rules it represents both source and destination.
    • groupFromExpanded [text]: Stores groupFrom in an expanded format where all nested groups and OEMs are expanded to list all client machines and customers contained in the groups.
    • groupToExpanded [text]: Stores groupTo in an expanded format where all nested groups and OEMs are expanded to list all client machines and customers contained in the groups.
    • privilegeMaskFriendlyNameID [int]: Sets the privilege mask associated with this connectivity rule. This is a link to a privilege table. This can also be set to the special value of −1, which implies that the privilege is not explicitly defined and will be inherited from a rule that is higher up in the logic chain. The privilege table can be transferred to a control station which includes code that can decode the table to determine which privileges are allowed in a connectivity.
    • isActive[bit]: Set to true if rule is currently considered active, meaning that it has not expired and has not explicitly been removed or deactivated as the result of being replaced by a new version of the rule following an edit.
    • isBidirectional[bit]: Set to true if rule is bidirectional, meaning that “from” can connect to “to” and vice versa. Set to false for one-way, “from”->“to” connectivity.
    • isReadOnly[bit]: Set to true if the rule is read only, meaning that it requires double confirmation on edit/delete and always appears at top of rule list display. Set to false for standard rule.
    • type[int]: 0=additive connectivity rule, 1=subtractive connectivity rule, 2=privilege-only rule
    • startUTC[int]: Defines the start of time window that rule is active in UTC seconds.
    • endUTC[int]: Defines the end of time window that rule is active in UTC seconds. For infinite rules, this will be set to 0.
    • createdUTC[int]: Timestamp of initial rule creation in UTC seconds. When a rule is edited, the original rule becomes inactive and a new rule is created, but the createdUTC timestamp is maintained in the new rule.
    • modifiedUTC[int]: Timestamp of most recent rule modification in UTC seconds. For rules being made inactive due to a rule edit, the newly inactive rule will have its modified timestamp set to the time of the edit.
    • creator[nvarchar]: The user who first created the rule. This can be automatically pulled from domain login credentials used to access the various UI pages.
    • lastModifiedBy[nvarchar]: The user who last modified the rule. This can be automatically pulled from domain login credentials used to access the various UI pages.
    • comments[text]: Textual comments attached to rule. These are required.


The ability to change/add groups and rules can be limited to a select field of users, requiring a password/code for access to the interfaces 60 and 90. The server 50 may provide interfaces that can be accessed by the remote control stations 16 to review connectivity. The pages can provide information on which robots can be accessed by a particular remote control station or which remote control stations can access a specific robot.


The server may provide a tester page that allows a user to test the connectivity between two endpoints. FIG. 4 shows an interface 130 that can be used to test connectivity. The interface 130 includes a “Control Station” field 132 that allows a user to enter a control station name and a “Robot” field 134 that allows the user to enter a robot name. If connectivity is allowed by the server 50 then the interface may indicate a successful connection as in FIG. 5. If connectivity is not allowed by the server 50 then the interface may display a message as shown in FIG. 4. In either case, the interface may display the list of all connectivity rules that applied to the calculation of the connectivity success or failure.


A manager control station is defined as any computer which has access to one or more of the interfaces depicted in FIGS. 2 and 5. For example, any office computer, including a remote control station itself, can be navigated to a secure web page through a browser such as Internet Explorer, and, after supplying credentials, access those interfaces.



FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of the robot 12. The robot 12 may include a high level control system 150 and a low level control system 152. The high level control system 150 may include a processor 154 that is connected to a bus 156. The bus is coupled to the camera 138 by an input/output (I/O) port 158, and to the monitor 140 by a serial output port 160 and a VGA driver 162. The monitor 40 may include a touchscreen function that allows the patient to enter input by touching the monitor screen.


The speaker 44 is coupled to the bus 156 by a digital to analog converter 164. The microphone 42 is coupled to the bus 156 by an analog to digital converter 166. The high level controller 150 may also contain random access memory (RAM) device 168, a non-volatile RAM device 170 and a mass storage device 172 that are all coupled to the bus 162. The mass storage device 172 may contain medical files of the patient that can be accessed by the user at the remote control station 16. For example, the mass storage device 172 may contain a picture of the patient. The user, particularly a health care provider, can recall the old picture and make a side by side comparison on the monitor 24 with a present video image of the patient provided by the camera 38. The robot antennae 46 may be coupled to a wireless transceiver 174. By way of example, the transceiver 174 may transmit and receive information in accordance with IEEE 802.11b.


The controller 154 may operate with a LINUX OS operating system. The controller 154 may also operate MS WINDOWS along with video, camera and audio drivers for communication with the remote control station 16. Video information may be transceived using MPEG CODEC compression techniques. The software may allow the user to send e-mail to the patient and vice versa, or allow the patient to access the Internet. In general the high level controller 150 operates to control the communication between the robot 12 and the remote control station 16. The controller and the high level controller 150 may be linked to the low level controller 152 by serial ports 176.


The low level controller 152 runs software routines that mechanically actuate the robot 12. For example, the low level controller 152 provides instructions to actuate the movement platform to move the robot 12. The low level controller 152 may receive movement instructions from the high level controller 150. The movement instructions may be received as movement commands from the remote control station. Although two controllers are shown, it is to be understood that the robot 12 may have one controller controlling the high and low level functions.



FIG. 7 shows an embodiment of the robot 12. The robot 12 may include a holonomic platform 150 that is attached to a robot housing 152. The holonomic platform 150 provides three degrees of freedom to allow the robot 12 to move in any direction.


The robot 12 may have a head 154 that supports the camera 38 and the monitor 40. The head 154 may have two degrees of freedom so that the camera 26 and monitor 24 can be swiveled and pivoted as indicated by the arrows.


The system may be the same or similar to a robotic system provided by the assignee InTouch-Health, Inc. of Santa Barbara, Calif. under the trademark RP-7. The system may also be the same or similar to the system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,925,357 issued Aug. 2, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference.


In operation, the robot 12 may be placed in a home, public or commercial property, or a facility where one or more patients are to be monitored and/or assisted. The facility may be a hospital or a residential care facility. By way of example, the robot 12 may be placed in a home where a health care provider may monitor and/or assist the patient. Likewise, a friend or family member may communicate with the patient. The cameras and monitors at both the robot and remote control stations allow for teleconferencing between the patient and the person at the remote station(s).


The robot 12 can be maneuvered through the home, property or facility by manipulating the input device 32 at a remote station 16.


The robot 10 may be controlled by a number of different users. To accommodate for this the robot may have an arbitration system. The arbitration system may be integrated into the operating system of the robot 12. For example, the arbitration technique may be embedded into the operating system of the high-level controller 150.


By way of example, the users may be divided into classes that include the robot itself, a local user, a caregiver, a doctor, a family member, or a service provider. The robot 12 may override input commands that conflict with robot operation. For example, if the robot runs into a wall, the system may ignore all additional commands to continue in the direction of the wall. A local user is a person who is physically present with the robot. The robot could have an input device that allows local operation. For example, the robot may incorporate a voice recognition system that receives and interprets audible commands.


A caregiver is someone who remotely monitors the patient. A doctor is a medical professional who can remotely control the robot and also access medical files contained in the robot memory. The family and service users remotely access the robot. The service user may service the system such as by upgrading software, or setting operational parameters.


Message packets may be transmitted between a robot 12 and a remote station 16. The packets provide commands and feedback. Each packet may have multiple fields. By way of example, a packet may include an ID field a forward speed field, an angular speed field, a stop field, a bumper field, a sensor range field, a configuration field, a text field and a debug field.


The identification of remote users can be set in an ID field of the information that is transmitted from the remote control station 16 to the robot 12. For example, a user may enter a user ID into a setup table in the application software run by the remote control station 16. The user ID is then sent with each message transmitted to the robot.


The robot 12 may operate in one of two different modes; an exclusive mode, or a sharing mode. In the exclusive mode only one user has access control of the robot. The exclusive mode may have a priority assigned to each type of user. By way of example, the priority may be in order of local, doctor, caregiver, family and then service user. In the sharing mode two or more users may share access with the robot. For example, a caregiver may have access to the robot, the caregiver may then enter the sharing mode to allow a doctor to also access the robot. Both the caregiver and the doctor can conduct a simultaneous tele-conference with the patient.


The arbitration scheme may have one of four mechanisms; notification, timeouts, queue and call back. The notification mechanism may inform either a present user or a requesting user that another user has, or wants, access to the robot. The timeout mechanism gives certain types of users a prescribed amount of time to finish access to the robot. The queue mechanism is an orderly waiting list for access to the robot. The call back mechanism informs a user that the robot can be accessed. By way of example, a family user may receive an e-mail message that the robot is free for usage. Tables 1 and 2, show how the mechanisms resolve access request from the various users.














TABLE I






Access
Medical
Command
Software/Debug
Set


User
Control
Record
Override
Access
Priority







Robot
No
No
Yes (1)
No
No


Local
No
No
Yes (2)
No
No


Caregiver
Yes
Yes
Yes (3)
No
No


Doctor
No
Yes
No
No
No


Family
No
No
No
No
No


Service
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes


















TABLE II









Requesting User













Local
Caregiver
Doctor
Family
Service

















Current
Local
Not Allowed
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Warn current user of


User


pending user
pending user
pending user
pending user





Notify requesting
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting





user that system is in
that system is in use
that system is in use
user that system is in





use
Set timeout = 5 m
Set timeout = 5 m
use





Set timeout

Call back
No timeout








Call back



Caregiver
Warn current user
Not Allowed
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Warn current user of




of pending user.

pending user
pending user
pending user




Notify requesting

Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting




user that system is

that system is in use
that system is in use
user that system is in




in use.

Set timeout = 5 m
Set timeout = 5 m
use




Release control

Queue or callback

No timeout








Callback



Doctor
Warn current user
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Notify requesting user
Warn current user of




of pending user
pending user
pending user
that system is in use
pending user




Notify requesting
Notify requesting
Notify requesting user
No timeout
Notify requesting




user that system is
user that system is in
that system is in use
Queue or callback
user that system is in




in use
use
No timeout

use




Release control
Set timeout = 5 m
Callback

No timeout








Callback



Family
Warn current user
Notify requesting
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Warn current user of




of pending user
user that system is in
pending user
pending user
pending user




Notify requesting
use
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting




user that system is
No timeout
that system is in use
that system is in use
user that system is in




in use
Put in queue or
Set timeout = 1 m
Set timeout = 5 m
use




Release Control
callback

Queue or callback
No timeout








Callback



Service
Warn current user
Notify requesting
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Not Allowed




of pending user
user that system is in
request
pending user




Notify requesting
use
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user




user that system is
No timeout
that system is in use
that system is in use




in use
Callback
No timeout
No timeout




No timeout

Callback
Queue or callback









The information transmitted between the station 16 and the robot 12 may be encrypted. Additionally, the user may have to enter a password to enter the system 10. A selected robot is then given an electronic key by the station 16. The robot 12 validates the key and returns another key to the station 16. The keys are used to encrypt information transmitted in the session.



FIG. 8 shows a robot head 200 that can both pivot and spin the camera 38 and the monitor 40. The robot head 200 can be similar to the robot 12 but without the platform 110. The robot head 200 may have the same mechanisms and parts to both pivot the camera 38 and monitor 40 about a pivot axis 4, and spin the camera 38 and monitor 40 about a spin axis 5. The pivot axis may intersect the spin axis. Having a robot head 200 that both pivots and spins provides a wide viewing area. The robot head 200 may be in the system either with or instead of the mobile robot 12.


While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.

Claims
  • 1. A remote controlled robot system, comprising: a robot that has a robot camera, a robot monitor, a robot microphone, and a robot speaker;a remote control station that can establish a connection to said robot, said remote control station includes a station camera, a station monitor, a station microphone, and a station speaker, said connection including one or more privileges that relate to access to said robot, said one or more privileges include the ability to host a multi-cast session with one or more other remote control stations;a server that controls which of said one or more privileges that relate to access to said robot are provided to said remote control station; and,a manager control station that can access said server to establish and edit said one or more privileges, wherein, when said connection is established, said robot monitor displays an image captured by said station camera, said station monitor displays an image captured by said robot monitor, said station speaker produces a sound captured by said robot microphone, and said robot speaker produces a sound captured by said station microphone.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein said robot includes a mobile platform.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein said privileges include an ability to operate said robot.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein said privileges include an ability to save media received from the robot.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein said privileges include an ability to view a video image captured by said robot camera.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein said privileges include an ability to hear audio captured by said robot microphone.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein said privileges include an ability for video captured by a control station camera to be displayed on said robot monitor.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein said privileges include an ability for audio captured by a control station microphone to be played by the robot speaker.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, further comprising an auxiliary device that can be coupled to said robot, and said privileges include an ability to access said auxiliary device attached to said robot.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein said server includes a privilege map that is transferred to said remote control station.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein said system includes a plurality of robots and a plurality of remote control stations, said server includes a database that lists groups of remote stations that can connect to groups of said robots.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein said connection between said remote control station and said robot is established by a time window.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein said server provides a user interface that allows one or more connectivity rules to be subtracted.
  • 14. A method for connecting a remote control station to a robot, comprising: setting one or more connectivity privileges through a manager control station, the one or more connectivity privileges relating to access to a robot that has a robot camera, a robot monitor, a robot microphone, and a robot speaker;connecting a remote control station with the robot, said remote control station including a station camera, a station monitor, a station microphone, and a station speaker, the connection being limited to the one or more connectivity privileges, said one or more connectivity privileges include the ability to host a multi-cast session with one or more other remote control stations; and,editing the one or more connectivity privileges, wherein, when said remote control station and said robot are connected, said robot monitor displays an image captured by said station camera, said station monitor displays an image captured by said robot monitor, said station speaker produces a sound captured by said robot microphone, and said robot speaker produces a sound captured by said station microphone.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the privilege includes an ability to operate the robot.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the privilege includes an ability to save media received from said robot.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the privilege includes an ability to view video captured by the robot camera.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, further comprising transmitting video captured by the robot camera to the remote control station.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application claiming priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/349,288, filed Jan. 6, 2009, pending, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/277,922, filed Nov. 25, 2008, pending.

US Referenced Citations (333)
Number Name Date Kind
4107689 Jellinek Aug 1978 A
4213182 Eichelberger et al. Jul 1980 A
4553309 Hess et al. Nov 1985 A
4679152 Perdue Jul 1987 A
4697278 Fleischer Sep 1987 A
4878501 Shue Nov 1989 A
5220263 Onishi et al. Jun 1993 A
5230023 Nakano Jul 1993 A
5262944 Weisner et al. Nov 1993 A
5305427 Nagata Apr 1994 A
5347306 Nitta Sep 1994 A
5347457 Tanaka et al. Sep 1994 A
5375195 Johnston Dec 1994 A
5400068 Ishida et al. Mar 1995 A
5413693 Redepenning May 1995 A
5486853 Baxter et al. Jan 1996 A
5510832 Garcia Apr 1996 A
5511147 Abdel-Malek Apr 1996 A
5563998 Yaksich et al. Oct 1996 A
5617539 Ludwig et al. Apr 1997 A
5619341 Auyeung et al. Apr 1997 A
5623679 Rivette et al. Apr 1997 A
5673082 Wells et al. Sep 1997 A
5675229 Thorne Oct 1997 A
5734805 Isensee et al. Mar 1998 A
5748629 Caldara et al. May 1998 A
5754631 Cave May 1998 A
5758079 Ludwig et al. May 1998 A
5793365 Tang et al. Aug 1998 A
5801755 Echerer Sep 1998 A
5844599 Hildin Dec 1998 A
5867494 Krishnaswamy et al. Feb 1999 A
5871451 Unger et al. Feb 1999 A
5872922 Hogan et al. Feb 1999 A
5961446 Beller et al. Oct 1999 A
5983263 Rothrock et al. Nov 1999 A
5995119 Cosatto et al. Nov 1999 A
6031845 Walding Feb 2000 A
6047259 Campbell et al. Apr 2000 A
6091219 Maruo et al. Jul 2000 A
6113343 Goldenberg et al. Sep 2000 A
6189034 Riddle Feb 2001 B1
6233735 Ebihara May 2001 B1
6250928 Poggio et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266162 Okamura et al. Jul 2001 B1
6292714 Okabayashi Sep 2001 B1
6314631 Pryor Nov 2001 B1
6317652 Osada Nov 2001 B1
6317953 Pryor Nov 2001 B1
6324184 Hou et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324443 Kurakake et al. Nov 2001 B1
6373855 Downing et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389329 Colens May 2002 B1
6400378 Snook Jun 2002 B1
6408230 Wada Jun 2002 B2
6411055 Fujita et al. Jun 2002 B1
6445964 White et al. Sep 2002 B1
6470235 Kasuga et al. Oct 2002 B2
6480762 Uchikubo et al. Nov 2002 B1
6529620 Thompson Mar 2003 B2
6567038 Granot et al. May 2003 B1
6581798 Liff et al. Jun 2003 B2
6590604 Tucker et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597392 Jenkins et al. Jul 2003 B1
6643496 Shimoyama et al. Nov 2003 B1
6666374 Green et al. Dec 2003 B1
6667592 Jacobs et al. Dec 2003 B2
6674259 Norman et al. Jan 2004 B1
6693585 MacLeod Feb 2004 B1
6724823 Rovati et al. Apr 2004 B2
6769771 Trumbull Aug 2004 B2
6816192 Nishikawa Nov 2004 B1
6816754 Mukai et al. Nov 2004 B2
6893267 Yueh May 2005 B1
6957712 Song et al. Oct 2005 B2
6990112 Brent et al. Jan 2006 B1
7007235 Hussein et al. Feb 2006 B1
7011538 Chang Mar 2006 B2
7015934 Toyama et al. Mar 2006 B2
RE39080 Johnston Apr 2006 E
7053578 Diehl et al. May 2006 B2
7055210 Keppler et al. Jun 2006 B2
7158861 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7164970 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167448 Wookey et al. Jan 2007 B2
7181455 Wookey et al. Feb 2007 B2
7219364 Bolle et al. May 2007 B2
7222000 Wang et al. May 2007 B2
7283153 Provost et al. Oct 2007 B2
7292257 Kang et al. Nov 2007 B2
7305114 Wolff et al. Dec 2007 B2
7317685 Flott et al. Jan 2008 B1
7332890 Cohen et al. Feb 2008 B2
7333642 Green Feb 2008 B2
7352153 Yan Apr 2008 B2
7363121 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B1
7391432 Terada Jun 2008 B2
7400578 Guthrie et al. Jul 2008 B2
7404140 O'Rourke Jul 2008 B2
7421470 Ludwig et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430209 Porter Sep 2008 B2
7433921 Ludwig et al. Oct 2008 B2
7467211 Herman et al. Dec 2008 B1
7483867 Ansari et al. Jan 2009 B2
7492731 Hagendorf Feb 2009 B2
7510428 Obata et al. Mar 2009 B2
7523069 Friedl et al. Apr 2009 B1
7557758 Rofougaran Jul 2009 B2
7587260 Bruemmer et al. Sep 2009 B2
7587512 Ta et al. Sep 2009 B2
7590060 Miceli Sep 2009 B2
7599290 Dos Remedios et al. Oct 2009 B2
7630314 Dos Remedios et al. Dec 2009 B2
7631833 Ghaleb et al. Dec 2009 B1
7643051 Sandberg et al. Jan 2010 B2
7647320 Mok et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657560 DiRienzo Feb 2010 B1
7680038 Gourlay Mar 2010 B1
7693757 Zimmerman Apr 2010 B2
7698432 Short et al. Apr 2010 B2
7703113 Dawson Apr 2010 B2
7737993 Kaasila et al. Jun 2010 B2
7739383 Short et al. Jun 2010 B1
7756614 Jouppi Jul 2010 B2
7769705 Luechtefeld Aug 2010 B1
7774158 Domingues et al. Aug 2010 B2
7860680 Arms et al. Dec 2010 B2
7861366 Hahm et al. Jan 2011 B2
7885822 Akers et al. Feb 2011 B2
7890382 Robb et al. Feb 2011 B2
7912583 Gutmann et al. Mar 2011 B2
7949616 Levy et al. May 2011 B2
7956894 Akers et al. Jun 2011 B2
7957837 Ziegler et al. Jun 2011 B2
7982769 Jenkins et al. Jul 2011 B2
7987069 Rodgers et al. Jul 2011 B2
8126960 Obradovich et al. Feb 2012 B2
8180486 Saito et al. May 2012 B2
8212533 Ota Jul 2012 B2
8265793 Cross et al. Sep 2012 B2
8287522 Moses et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292807 Perkins et al. Oct 2012 B2
8320534 Kim et al. Nov 2012 B2
8340654 Bratton et al. Dec 2012 B2
8340819 Mangaser et al. Dec 2012 B2
8348675 Dohrmann Jan 2013 B2
8374171 Cho et al. Feb 2013 B2
8400491 Panpaliya et al. Mar 2013 B1
8401275 Wang et al. Mar 2013 B2
8423284 O'Shea Apr 2013 B2
8451731 Lee et al. May 2013 B1
8463435 Herzog et al. Jun 2013 B2
8503340 Xu Aug 2013 B1
8515577 Wang et al. Aug 2013 B2
8527094 Kumar et al. Sep 2013 B2
8532860 Daly Sep 2013 B2
8610786 Ortiz Dec 2013 B2
8612051 Norman et al. Dec 2013 B2
8639797 Pan et al. Jan 2014 B1
8670017 Stuart et al. Mar 2014 B2
8726454 Gilbert, Jr. et al. May 2014 B2
8836751 Ballantyne et al. Sep 2014 B2
8849679 Wang et al. Sep 2014 B2
8849680 Wright et al. Sep 2014 B2
8861750 Roe et al. Oct 2014 B2
8897920 Wang et al. Nov 2014 B2
8902278 Pinter et al. Dec 2014 B2
9195233 Perrone Nov 2015 B2
20010020200 Das et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010048464 Barnett Dec 2001 A1
20010051881 Filler Dec 2001 A1
20020027597 Sachau Mar 2002 A1
20020027652 Paromtchik et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020033880 Sul et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038168 Kasuga et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020044201 Alexander et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049517 Ruffner Apr 2002 A1
20020055917 Muraca May 2002 A1
20020085030 Ghani Jul 2002 A1
20020095239 Wallach et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106998 Presley et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020109770 Terada Aug 2002 A1
20020109775 White et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128985 Greenwald Sep 2002 A1
20020133062 Arling et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030021107 Howell et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030050734 Lapham Mar 2003 A1
20030080901 Piotrowski May 2003 A1
20030112823 Collins et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120714 Wolff et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135097 Wiederhold et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152145 Kawakita Aug 2003 A1
20030195662 Wang et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212472 McKee Nov 2003 A1
20030216833 Mukai et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030236590 Park et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040001197 Ko et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040001676 Colgan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040008138 Hockley, Jr. et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040017475 Akers et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040088078 Jouppi et al. May 2004 A1
20040095516 Rohlicek May 2004 A1
20040107254 Ludwig et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040107255 Ludwig et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117067 Jouppi Jun 2004 A1
20040123158 Roskind Jun 2004 A1
20040135879 Stacy et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040150725 Taguchi Aug 2004 A1
20040168148 Goncalves et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172306 Wohl et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186623 Dooley et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040205664 Prendergast Oct 2004 A1
20040218099 Washington Nov 2004 A1
20040222638 Bednyak Nov 2004 A1
20040241981 Doris et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260790 Balloni et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004708 Goldenberg et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050060211 Xiao et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065435 Rauch et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050073575 Thacher et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050078816 Sekiguchi et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050125083 Kiko Jun 2005 A1
20050125098 Wang et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149364 Ombrellaro Jul 2005 A1
20050152447 Jouppi et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050152565 Jouppi et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050168568 Jouppi Aug 2005 A1
20050225634 Brunetti et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050231586 Rodman et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234592 McGee et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050264649 Chang et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050286759 Zitnick et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010028 Sorensen Jan 2006 A1
20060014388 Lur et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020694 Nag et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060056655 Wen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060056837 Vapaakoski Mar 2006 A1
20060066609 Iodice et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071797 Rosenfeld et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074719 Horner Apr 2006 A1
20060125356 Meek et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149418 Anvari Jul 2006 A1
20060161136 Anderson et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060171515 Hintermeister et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060173708 Vining et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178559 Kumar et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178777 Park et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060224781 Tsao et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247045 Jeong et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060268704 Ansari et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271238 Choi et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271400 Clements et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070025711 Marcus Feb 2007 A1
20070093279 Janik Apr 2007 A1
20070116152 Thesling May 2007 A1
20070133407 Choi et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070170886 Plishner Jul 2007 A1
20070198130 Wang et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070226949 Hahm et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255706 Iketani et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070290040 Wurman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009969 Bruemmer et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027591 Lenser et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033641 Medalia Feb 2008 A1
20080045804 Williams Feb 2008 A1
20080051985 D'Andrea et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080086241 Phillips et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091340 Milstein et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080126132 Warner et al. May 2008 A1
20080161969 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080174570 Jobs et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201016 Finlay Aug 2008 A1
20080232763 Brady Sep 2008 A1
20080263628 Norman et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080267069 Thielman et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080306375 Sayler et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090044334 Parsell et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090049640 Lee et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090070135 Parida et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090086013 Thapa Apr 2009 A1
20090102919 Zamierowski et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106679 Anzures et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090122699 Alperovitch et al. May 2009 A1
20090144425 Marr et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164255 Menschik et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164657 Li et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090171170 Li et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177323 Ziegler et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177641 Raghavan Jul 2009 A1
20090248200 Root Oct 2009 A1
20100017046 Cheung et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100026239 Li et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100030578 Siddique et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100051596 Diedrick et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100063848 Kremer et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100066804 Shoemake et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100085874 Noy et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088232 Gale Apr 2010 A1
20100131102 Herzog et al. May 2010 A1
20100145479 Griffiths Jun 2010 A1
20100157825 Anderlind et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100171826 Hamilton et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100228249 Mohr et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100278086 Pochiraju et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100286905 Goncalves et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100301679 Murray et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110022705 Yellamraju et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110071675 Wells et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110072114 Hoffert et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110153198 Kokkas et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110193949 Nambakam et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110195701 Cook et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213210 Temby et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110280551 Sammon Nov 2011 A1
20110306400 Nguyen Dec 2011 A1
20120023506 Maeckel et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120036484 Zhang et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059946 Wang Mar 2012 A1
20120072023 Ota Mar 2012 A1
20120072024 Wang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120092157 Tran Apr 2012 A1
20120095352 Tran Apr 2012 A1
20120113856 Krishnaswamy May 2012 A1
20120191246 Roe Jul 2012 A1
20120191464 Stuart et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120203731 Nelson et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120291809 Kuhe et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130250938 Anandakumar et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140047022 Chan et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140085543 Hartley et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140135990 Stuart et al. May 2014 A1
20140139616 Pinter et al. May 2014 A1
20140155755 Pinter et al. Jun 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
2000012162 Oct 1999 AU
1404695 Mar 2003 CN
1561923 Jan 2005 CN
1743144 Mar 2006 CN
101049017 Oct 2007 CN
101151614 Mar 2008 CN
100407729 Jul 2008 CN
20031304872 Apr 2003 EP
20071763243 Mar 2007 EP
1819108 Aug 2007 EP
1232610 Jan 2009 EP
20072431261 Apr 2007 GB
07-194609 Aug 1995 JP
11-220706 Aug 1999 JP
11220706 Aug 1999 JP
2002101333 May 2002 JP
2002-305743 Oct 2002 JP
2002-321180 Nov 2002 JP
2004-181229 Jul 2004 JP
2005-111083 Apr 2005 JP
2006508806 Mar 2006 JP
2006109094 Apr 2006 JP
2007007040 Jan 2007 JP
2007-232208 Sep 2007 JP
2007-316966 Dec 2007 JP
2009-125133 Jun 2009 JP
20100019479 Feb 2010 KR
9742761 Nov 1997 WO
2000025516 May 2000 WO
0131861 May 2001 WO
03077745 Sep 2003 WO
2004012018 Feb 2004 WO
2006044847 Apr 2006 WO
2007041295 Apr 2007 WO
2011097132 Dec 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (67)
Entry
“Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in No. 11-CV-9185, Judge Percy Anderson”, May 9, 2014, pp. 1-48.
“Google translation of: Innovations Report”, From research project to television star: Care-O-bot in ZDF series, available online at <http://www.innovations-report.de/specials/printa.php?id=5157>, Sep. 28, 2001.
“MPEG File Format Summary”, downloaded from: <http://www.fileformat.info/format/mpeg/egff.htm>, Feb. 1, 2001, 8 pages.
“MPEG-4: a Powerful Standard for Use in Web and Television Environments”, by Rob Koenen (KPN Research), downloaded from <http://www.w3.org/Architecture/1998/06/Workshop/paper26>, Jul. 1, 1998, 4 pages.
CMU Course 16X62, “Robot user's manual”, (describing the Nomad Scout), Carnegie Mellon University, Feb. 1, 2001, 11 pages.
Panusopone et al., “Performance comparison of MPEG-4 and H.263+ for streaming video applications”, Circuits Systems Signal Processing, vol. 20, No. 3, 2001, pp. 293-309.
Schraft et al., “Care-O-botTM: The Concept of a System for Assisting Elderly or Disabled Persons in Home Environments”, IEEE Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society, IECON '98, Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2476-2481.
Apple, Inc., “iPhone”, iPhone Series, XP002696350, hftp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone—5, n. d., retrieved Apr. 30, 2013, pp. 1-29.
Blaer, et al., “TopBot: Automated Network Topology Detection With a Mobile Robot”, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics 7 Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, Sep. 14-19, 2003, pp. 1582-1587.
Bradner, “The Internet Standards Process—Revision 3”, Network Working Group Request for Comments: 2026, www.rfc-e ditor.org!rfC/r1c2026. txt, Oct. 1996, pp. 1-36.
Christensen et al., “BeeSoft User's Guide and Reference”, Robots for the Real World™, Real World Interface, Inc., www.praecogito.com/-brudy/zaza/BeeSoft-manual-1.2-2/ beeman˜1.htm, Sep. 26, 1997, pp. 1-203.
Dario, “A Robot Workstation for Diagnosis and Physical Therapy”, IEEE Catalog No. 88TH0234-5, 1989, pp. 67-72.
Gostai, “Robotic Telepresence: Gos ai Jazz”, Flyer, http://www.gostai.com, n. date, 4 pgs.
Leifer, et al., “VIPRR: A Virtually In Person Rehabilitation Robot”, Proceedings of 1997 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, http://www.stanford.edu/group/rrdlPeople/vdl/publicationsIICORR97/VIPRR.html, Apr. 14-15, 1997, 4 pgs.
Minsky, “Telepresence”, OMNI, Jun. 1980, pp. 1-6.
Motorola Technical Developments, et al., “Detection of Target Mobile Signal Strength”, PriorArt Database: Technical Disclosure, IP.com, Retrieved from http:www.ip.com/pubview/IPCOM000009024D, original publication date: Jan. 1, 1999 by Motorola, Inc., pp. 205-206, Aug. 1, 2002, pp. 1583-1587.
Noritsugu, “Application of Rubber Artificial Muscle Manipulator as a Rehabilitation Robot”, IEEE/ASME Transations on Mechatronics, vol. 2, No. 4, Dec. 1997, pp. 259-267.
Osborn, “QoLT Research Overview”, Quality of Life Technology Center:A National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University of Pittsburgh, www.qolt.org, n. date, 2 pgs.
Reynolds et al., “Review of Robotic Telemedicine Utilization in Intensive Care Units (ICUs)”, 11th Annual ATA Symposium, Tampa, Florida, 2011, 1 pg.
Saphira Software Manual, Saphira Version 5.3, ActiveMedia, Inc., 1997, 105 pgs.
Tipsuwan, et al., “Gain Adaptation of Networked Mobile Robot to Compensate QoS Deterioration”, IEEE, 2000, pp. 3146-3151.
Tsui, et al., “Exploring Use Cases for Telepresence Robots”, Human-Robot Interaction, Lausanne, Switzerland, http://robotics.cs.uml.edu/fileadmin/content/publications/2011/tsui-et-al-telepresence-HRI11.pdf, Robotics Lab UMass Lowell, 2011, 7 pgs.
UMass Lowell Robotics Lab, “Robotics Lab © UMASS Lowell”, Brochure, http://robotics.cs.uml.edu/fileadmin/content/brochures/roboticslab—brochure—2011—WEB.pdf, 2011, 2 pgs.
Video Middleware Group, “H.350 Directory Services for Multimedia”, http://www.vide.net/resources/h350vendor.pdf, n. date, 2 pgs.
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No.. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. I of IV, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A1-A6357.
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. II of IV, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A6849-A10634.
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. III of IV, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A10654-A15517.
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. IV of IV, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A15677-A18127.
Brief for Defendant-Appellee VGO Communications, Inc., Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, in Case No. 2:11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, May 28, 2013, 75 pages.
Civil Minutes-General: Case No. CV 11-9185PA (AJWx), InTouch Tech., Inc. v. VGo Commons, Inc., Sep. 10, 2012, 7 pages.
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680044698.0, Nov. 4, 2010, 9 pages of Official Copy and 15 pages of English Translation.
Opening Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant InTouch Technologies, Inc., Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Apr. 12, 2013, 187 pages.
Reply Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant InTouch Technologies, Inc., Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Jun. 14, 2013, 39 pages.
Activmedia Robotics, “Pioneer 2/PeopleBot, Operations Manual, Version 9”, Oct. 2001, 78 pages.
Weaver et al., “Monitoring and Control Using the Internet and Java”, vol. 3, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 1999, pp. 1152-1158.
Garner et al., “The Application of Telepresence in Medicine”, BT Technology Journal, vol. 15, No. 4, Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 181-187.
“Mange Charge”, Smart Power for Electric Vehicles, General Motors Corporation, Serial No. 75189637, Registration No. 2114006, Filing Date: Oct. 29, 1996, Aug. 26, 1997, 2 pages.
“Using your Infrared Cell Phone Camera”, Available on <http://www.catsdomain.com/xray/about.htm>, retrieved on Jan. 23, 2014, Courtesy of Internet Wayback Machine, Jan. 30, 2010, 4 pages.
Weiss et al., “Telework and Video-Mediated Communication: Importance of Real-Time, Interactive Communication for Workers with Disabilities”, Available online at <http://www.telbotics.com/research—3.htm>, retrieved on Nov. 23, 2010, 1999, 3 pages.
Jacobs et al., “Applying Telemedicine to Outpatient Physical Therapy”, AMIA, Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2002, 1 page.
Kurlowicz et al., “The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)”, The Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, Journal of Psychiatric Research, No. 3, Jan. 1999, 2 pages.
Lemaire, Edward, “Using Communication Technology to Enhance Rehabilitation Services”, Terry Fox Mobile Clinic, The Rehabilitation Centre, Ottawa, Canada, Version 2.0, 1998-2001, 104 pages.
Nakazato et al., “Group-Based Interface for Content-Based Image Retrieval”, Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 2002, pp. 187-194.
Nakazato et al., “Group-Oriented User Interface for Digital Image Management”, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, vol. 14, No. 4, Aug. 2003, pp. 45-46.
North, Michael, “Telemedicine: Sample Script and Specifications for a Demonstration of Simple Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Using Live Two-Way Video on a Computer Network”, Greenstar Corporation, 1998, 5 pages.
Piquepaille, Roland, “How New Technologies are Modifying Our Way of Life”, Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends, This Blog and its RSS Feed Are Moving, Oct. 31, 2004, 2 pages.
Radvision, “Making Sense of Bandwidth the NetSense Way”, Network Congestion in Unmanaged Networks Bandwidth Estimation and Adaptation Techniques, Radvision's Netsense Technology, 2010, 7 pages.
Roy et al., “Towards Personal Service Robots for the Elderly”, Workshop on Interactive Robots and Entertainment (WIRE 2000), vol. 25, Apr. 30-May 1, 2000, 7 pages.
Theodosiou et al., “MuLVAT: A Video Annotation Tool Based on XML-Dictionaries and Shot Clustering”, 19th International Conference, Artificial Neural Networks-ICANN, Sep. 14-17, 2009, pp. 913-922.
Tyrrell et al., “Teleconsultation in Psychology: The Use of Videolinks for Interviewing and Assessing Elderly Patients”, British Geriatrics Society, Age and Ageing, vol. 30, No. 3, May 2001, pp. 191-195.
Telepresence Research, Inc., “Telepresence Mobile Robot System”, available online at <http://www. telepresence.com/telepresence-research/TELEROBOT/>, retrieved on Nov. 23, 2010, Feb. 20, 1995, 3 pages.
Adams, Chris, “Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB'02)—From Animals to Animats 7”, Mobile Robotics Research Group, The Seventh International Conference, available online at: <http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/groups/mrg/MRG.html>, retrieved on Jan. 22, 2014, Aug. 4-11, 2002, 1 page.
Evans et al., “HelpMate: The Trackless Robotic Courier”, PYXIS, available online at <http://www.pyxis.com/>, 3 pages.
Gaidioz et al., “Synchronizing Network Probes to Avoid Measurement Intrusiveness with the Network Weather Service”, High-Performance Distributed Computing, Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium, 2000, pp. 147-154.
Screenshot Showing Google Date for Lemaire Telehealth Manual, Screenshot Retrieved on Dec. 18, 2014, 1 page.
Nomadic Technologies, Inc., “Nomad Scout Language Reference Manual”, Software Version: 2.7, Part No. DOC00002, Jul. 12, 1999, 47 pages.
Nomadic Technologies, Inc., “Nomad Scout User's Manual”, Software Version 2.7, Part No. DOC00004, Jul. 12, 1999, pp. 1-59.
ACM Digital Library Record, Autonomous Robots, vol. 11, No. 1, Table of Content, available at <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=591550&picked=prox&cfid=360891374&cftoken=35225929>, Jul. 2001, 2 pages.
Brenner, Pablo, “A Technical Tutorial on the IEEE 802.11 Protocol”, BreezeCOM Wireless Communications, Jul. 18, 1996, pp. 1-24.
Library of Congress, “008-Fixed-Length Data Elements (NR)”, MARC 21 Format for Classification Data, available at <http://www.loc.gov/marc/classification/cd008.html>, retrieved on Jul. 22, 2014, pp. 1-14.
Paulos et al., “Personal Tele-Embodiment”, Chapter 9 in Goldberg et al., Ed., “Beyond Webcams”, MIT Press, Jan. 4, 2002, pp. 155-167.
Paulos et al., “Social Tele-Embodiment: Understanding Presence”, Autonomous Robots, vol. 11, No. 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Jul. 2001, pp. 87-95.
Paulos, Eric John, “Personal Tele-Embodiment”, Introductory and Cover Pages from 2001 Dissertation Including Contents table, together with E-mails Relating thereto from UC Berkeley Libraties, as Shelved at UC Berkeley Engineering Library (Northern Regional Library Facility), May 8, 2002, 25 pages (including 4 pages of e-mails).
Paulos, Eric John, “Personal Tele-Embodiment”, OskiCat Catalog Record, UCB Library Catalog, Results page and MARC Display, retrieved on Jun. 14, 2014, 3 Pages.
NetMeeting, available online at <http://web.archive.orgjweb/2006041 723 555 5/http://transcriptions .english>, retrieved on Apr. 17, 2006, 2 pages.
Fulbright et al., “Swami: An Autonomous Mobile Robot for Inspection of Nuclear Waste of Storage Facilities”, Autonomous Robots, 2, 1995, pp. 225-235.
Hameed et al., “A Review of Telemedicine”, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 5, Supplement 1, 1999, 1 page.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140156078 A1 Jun 2014 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12349288 Jan 2009 US
Child 13894246 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12277922 Nov 2008 US
Child 12349288 US