The present invention relates to a servo control device.
In a servo control device employed in, for example, a machine tool, various control methods have been proposed in order to improve the precision of positioning control.
Movement in the X-axis direction of the table 2 is performed by a ball-screw drive mechanism. Movement in the Y-axis direction of the carriage 5 provided with the ram 6 is also performed by another ball-screw drive mechanism installed at the column 3.
With a relatively large machine tool, such as the one shown in
In order to solve such a problem, for example, it has been proposed to model a servo system or a machine system and to perform feedforward compensation using a transfer function having an inverse of that model (for example, see Patent Literature 1).
With the invention disclosed in Patent Literature 1, although the position of the carriage 5 can be compensated for vibrations of the column itself, there is a problem in that it is not possible to cope with characteristic vibrations of the carriage 5 caused by the vibrations of the column, and it is difficult to maintain a desired precision for the positioning control.
Furthermore, with the invention disclosed in Patent Literature 1, it is necessary to identify machine constants in a transfer function for the feedforward compensation control; however, it is difficult to accurately identify such machine constants, and there is a problem in that, without appropriately identifying the machine constants, the desired precision cannot be maintained even if the feedforward compensation control is performed.
The present invention has been conceived in view of the above-described circumstances, and an object thereof is to provide a servo control device that is capable of realizing improved precision of positioning control.
In order to solve the above-described problems, the present invention employs the following solutions.
The present invention provides a servo control device that is applied to a numerical control equipment provided with a screw-feeding section that converts rotational movement of a motor to linear movement, a driven section that is linearly moved by the screw-feeding section, and a support member by which the screw-feeding section and the driven section are supported and that controls the motor so as to match a position of the driven section to a positioning instruction, including a support-member-reaction-force compensating section that compensates for vibrations of the driven section due to vibrational reaction force of the support member, wherein a transfer function provided in the support-member-reaction-force compensating section includes a stiffness term for the driven section.
By employing such a configuration, with the support-member-reaction-force compensating section, it becomes possible to compensate for positioning-control errors due to the vibrations of the driven part caused by the vibration of the support member. Accordingly, it becomes possible to improve the precision of positioning control of the driven section. Since the transfer function provided in the support-member-reaction-force compensating section includes the stiffness term for the driven section, it is possible to estimate a level at which the vibrations of the support member are transmitted to the driven section with considerable precision.
In the servo control system described above, the support-member-reaction-force compensating section may be provided in a feedforward control system for velocity control of the motor.
In this way, by providing the support-member-reaction-force compensating section in the feedforward control system for controlling the motor velocity, it becomes possible to accurately perform compensation for the motor velocity.
In the servo control system described above, the transfer function provided in the support-member-reaction-force compensating section may include a stiffness term for the support member, and the stiffness term for the support member may be identified on the basis of a vibration resonance frequency of vibrations generated when an impact is applied to the support member or the driven section.
Since the vibrational resonance frequency is used in this way, for example, in comparison with a method of identifying from the relationship between the force and the deformation, a greater measurement precision can be obtained, and a greater identification precision can be obtained.
The servo control system described above may include a constant identifying section that identifies the stiffness term for the support member, wherein the constant identifying section may include an impact generating section that vibrates the driven section by applying an impact to the driven section; a vibration detecting section that detects the vibrations of the driven section or the support member when the impact is applied thereto; and a support-member-stiffness-term identifying section that calculates a resonance frequency of the driven section from a vibration signal detected by the vibration detecting section and that identifies the stiffness term for the support member from this resonance frequency.
The driven section is vibrated by applying an impact to the driven section in this way, and the stiffness term for the support member is identified on the basis of the state of these vibrations; therefore, it is possible to increase the reliability of identification of the stiffness term for the support member.
In the servo control system described above, the transfer function provided in the support-member-reaction-force compensating section may include a viscosity term for the support member, and the viscosity term of the support member may be identified on the basis of attenuation of the vibrations generated when the support member or the driven section is vibrated by applying an impact thereto.
In this way, the viscosity term for the support member is identified on the basis of attenuation of the vibrations; therefore, the viscosity term for the support member can easily be identified.
The servo control system described above may include a constant identifying section that identifies constants included in the transfer function provided in the support-member-reaction-force compensating section, wherein the constant identifying section may include an impact generating section that vibrates the driven section by applying an impact to the driven section; a vibration detecting section that detects the vibrations of the driven section or the support member when the impact is applied thereto; and a support-member-viscosity-term identifying section that calculates an attenuation rate of the vibrations of the driven section from a vibration signal detected by the vibration detecting section and that identifies the viscosity term for the support member from the attenuation rate of the vibrations.
In this way, the driven section is vibrated by applying an impact thereto, and the viscosity term for the support member is identified on the basis of the state of the vibrations; therefore, it is possible to increase the reliability of identification of the viscosity term for the support member.
In the servo control system described above, the impact generating section may vibrate the driven section by moving the driven section at or above a predetermined acceleration.
In this way, the vibrations are generated by applying an impact to the driven section by moving the driven section; therefore, it becomes possible to check the conditions of the vibrations in a mode that is closer to the actual operation.
In the servo control system described above, when amplitudes of the vibrations of the driven section detected by the vibration detecting section exceed a predetermined threshold after the constants are identified, the constant identifying section may adjust the constants on the basis of the vibration signal detected by the vibration detecting section.
In this way, whether or not the constants are appropriate is checked after the constants are identified, and, if they are not appropriate, the constants are adjusted until appropriate values are set; therefore, it is possible to increase the identification precision of the constants.
In the servo control system described above, during a period in which the numerical control equipment is being driven, the constant identifying section may compare the vibration signal detected by the vibration detecting section with an estimated vibration signal calculated from a model in the support-member-reaction-force compensating section and may adjust machine constants of the transfer function provided in the support-member-reaction-force compensating section on the basis of this comparison.
With such a configuration, because the constants are adjusted even during a period in which the numerical control equipment is being driven, it is possible to always set the constants at appropriate values. Accordingly, it is possible to improve the precision of positioning control of the driven section.
With the present invention, an advantage is afforded in that precision of positioning control can be improved.
Embodiments of a servo control device of the present invention, as applied to a machine tool (numerical control equipment) shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The machine-deflection compensating section 200 compensates the instructed position θ with a transfer function, described later, and outputs a compensated instructed position θ′. The subtraction section 101 outputs a positioning difference Δθ, which is the difference between the compensated column instructed position θ′ and the load position θL. The multiplication section 102 multiplies the positioning difference Δθ by a positioning loop gain KP and outputs a velocity difference ΔV. The subtraction section 103 outputs an instructed velocity V, which is a value obtained by subtracting the motor velocity ωM from a value obtained by adding a compensated velocity V′ output from the velocity feedforward section 201 to the velocity difference Δθ. The proportional integral calculation section 104 proportionally integrates the instructed velocity V and outputs the instructed torque τ. The proportional integral calculation section 104 obtains the instructed torque τ by performing a calculation τ=VKT{Kv(1+(1/Tvs))}, using a velocity loop gain Kv, an integration time constant Tv, and a torque constant KT.
This instructed torque τ is supplied to the control-target equipment shown in
Next, the velocity feedforward section 201 will be described. As shown in
The above-described first-order differential coefficient to fourth-order differential coefficient are set in transfer functions of inverse models of the torque and the velocity in machine system models. A transfer function of the above-described velocity loop compensating section 310 is expressed as {KP/(1+Tvs)}, using the positioning loop gain KP and the integration time constant Tv; and a transfer function of the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 is expressed as {JCJL/KR)s2/(2JCs2+CCs+KC)}, using inertia JC of the column, inertia JL of the carriage and the ram, column viscosity CC, feeding-system stiffness KR, and spring stiffness KC of the column.
At the velocity feedforward section 201, when the instructed position θ′, for which the positioning compensation has been performed by the machine-deflection compensation section 200, is input, the first-order differential term that has been multiplied by the first-order differential coefficient, the second-order differential term that has been multiplied by the second-order differential coefficient, the third-order differential term that has been multiplied by the third-order differential coefficient, and the fourth-order differential term that has been multiplied by the fourth-order differential coefficient are individually input to the addition section 309; these different differential coefficients are summed thereby and supplied to the velocity loop compensating section 310. At the velocity loop compensating section 310, the positioning compensation expressed by the above-described transfer functions is performed, and then, the result is output to the subtraction section 312.
The third-order differential term output from the third-order-differential-term calculating section 303 is also input to the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 and is output to the subtraction section 312, after the positioning compensation expressed by the above-described transfer function is performed. At the subtraction section 312, the amount of positioning compensation by the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 is subtracted from the output from the velocity loop compensating section 310 to calculate the compensated velocity V′, and this compensated velocity V′ is output to the subtraction section 103 in
With the servo control device shown in
Next, the machine-deflection compensating section 200 shown in
As described above, the purpose of the servo control device 100 according to this embodiment is to prevent deterioration of the precision of the positioning control due to the vibrations of the carriage 5 caused by the vibrations of the column 3, when the column 3 vibrates due to the movement of the carriage 5 and the ram 6.
When the column 3 vibrates, the positioning control of the carriage 5 must be performed in consideration of the vibrations of the column 3 itself, and the positioning control of the carriage 5 must also be performed in consideration of the vibrations of the carriage 5 and the ram 6 due to the reaction force of the vibrations of the column 3.
That is, when the column 3 and the carriage 5 both have high stiffness, the carriage 5 vibrates with the column 3 at the same amplitude and the same frequency therewith. Therefore, in this case, characteristic vibrations of the carriage 5 need not be considered, and only the positioning errors due to the vibrations of the column 3 need to be considered.
As opposed to this, when the stiffness of the carriage 5 is low, the carriage 5 vibrates due to the reaction force of the column 3, and, in addition, these vibrations are not necessarily the same as the vibrations of the column 3; therefore, the carriage 5 vibrates with a different period and phase from the column 3. In this case, not only the positioning errors due to the vibrations of the column 3 but also positioning errors due to the characteristic vibrations of the carriage 5 caused by the reaction force of the vibrations of the column 3 need to be considered, and the positioning-control errors involved therein need to be compensated for.
In this way, the present invention focuses on the characteristic vibrations of the carriage 5 caused by the reaction force of the vibrations of the column 3, and one feature thereof is the compensation for the positioning errors due to these characteristic vibrations of the carriage 5.
Accordingly, the servo control device 100 according to this embodiment includes a compensation model for compensating for positioning errors due to not only the vibrations of the column 3 itself described above, but also the vibrations of the carriage 5 caused by the reaction force of the vibrations of the column 3. This compensation model is the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 shown in
In this way, the servo control device 100 according to this embodiment includes two compensation models constituted of the machine-deflection compensating section 200 that compensates for the positioning-control errors due to the vibrations of the column 3 itself, and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 that compensates for the positioning errors due to the vibrations of the carriage 5 caused by the reaction force of the vibrations of the column 3. By including the two compensation models in this way, it is possible to efficiently eliminate positioning-control errors due to the vibrations of the column, and it is possible to improve the precision of the positioning control in the Y-axis direction of the machine tool shown in
Next, derivation processes of the transfer functions of the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311, described above, will be briefly described.
As shown in
When the properties of the carriage 5, which is the load, are modeled and expressed as transfer functions, they are represented by Block 5-1 and Block 5-2. θM, θL, CR, KR, JL, and DL indicate the motor position, the load position, translational attenuation of the feeding system, feeding-system stiffness, carriage-ram inertia, and load viscosity (carriage viscosity), respectively.
Upon receiving a difference (θM−θL) between the motor position θM and the load position θL, the Block 5-1 outputs a reaction force torque. Upon receiving a value obtained by summing this reaction force torque and the reaction force of the column vibrations, the Block 5-2 outputs the load position θL.
When properties of the column 3 are modeled and expressed as transfer functions, they are represented by Block 3-1 and Block 3-2. JC indicates column inertia, CC indicates column viscosity, and KC indicates column stiffness.
Next, on the basis of the machine system model shown in
First, in the machine system model shown in
τ−(θM−θL)KR+θCJCs2=θM(JMs2+DMs) (1)
(θM−θL)KR−θCJCs2=θL(JLs2+DLs) (2)
−(θM−θL)KR−θC(KC+CCs)=θCJCs2 (3)
The following expression (4) is derived by summing the above-described expressions (2) and (3).
−θCJCs2−θC(KC+CCs)=θL(JLs2+DLs)+θCJCs2
−θL(JLs2+DLs)=θC(2JCs2+CCs+KC) (4)
Since the machine tip position θ is θ=θL+θC,
θC=θ−θL (5)
From the above-described expressions (4) and (5), the following expression (6) is finally obtained.
−(JLs2+DLs)θL=(θ−θL)·(2JCs2+CCs+KC)
{(2JCs2+CCs+KC)−(JLs2+DLs)}θL=θ(2JCs2+CCs+KC)
θL=θ(2JCs2+CCs+KC)/{(2JC−JL)s2+(CC−DL)s+KC} (6)
Here, in order to match the machine tip position with the instructed position θ, the carriage position θL detected by the linear scale (position sensor) 14 needs to be shifted in accordance with expression (6). Therefore, the machine-deflection compensating section 200 is represented (see
G1(s)=(2JCs2+CCs+KC)/{(2JC−JL)s2+(CC−DL)s+KC} (7)
Next, the transfer function of the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 in the velocity feedforward section 201 will be described.
By determining the relationship between the detected position θL of the carriage 5 and the motor velocity θMs from the machine system model shown in
θC={(θM−θL)KR−θLJLs2}/JCs2 (8)
The following expression (9) is derived from the above-described expressions (3) and (8).
−(θM−θL)KR−[{(θM−θL)KR−θLJLs2}/JCs2]*(KC+CCs)
=(θM−θL)KR−θLJLs2 (9)
Furthermore,
θM[−2KR−KR(KC+CCs)/JCs2]
=θL[−2kR−JLs2−(JL/JC)*(KC−CCs)−KR/JCs2*(KC+CCs)]
Rearranging these,
θM[−2KRJCs2−KR(KC+CCs)]
=θL[−2KRJCs2−JLs2*JCs2−JL*(KC+CCs)s2−KR*(KC+CCs)]
Therefore, the following expression (10) is obtained.
Here, in order to extract only the column-reaction-force compensation, by subtracting the following expression (11), which corresponds to compensation in a two-mass system in the above-described expression (2), from the above described expression (10), expression (12) is obtained.
θMs=θLs[(JL/KR)s2+1] (11)
In order to obtain the motor velocity, both sides are multiplied by the Laplacian coefficient, and expression (13) is obtained.
Then, the above-described expression (13) is applied to the block diagram of the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 shown in
Next, identification methods of machine constants used in the transfer function of the above-described machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the transfer function of the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 in the velocity feedforward section 201 will be described.
First, as shown in the above-described expression (7), the transfer function G1(s) of the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the transfer function G2(s) of the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 in the velocity feedforward section 201 include six machine constants, the column inertia JC, the column viscosity CC, the column stiffness KC, the carriage-ram inertia JL, the load viscosity DL, and the feeding-system stiffness KR. Among these, the column inertia JC, the column viscosity CC, the column stiffness KC, and the feeding-system stiffness KR are variable constants, and it is desirable that identification methods for these be simple.
Additionally, among these four machine constants, the column inertia JC can be estimated because the machine weight of each section is known, and identification thereof is not necessary. The feeding-system stiffness KR can also be estimated from a theoretical value of the ball-screw stiffness, and identification thereof is not necessary.
Therefore, by determining the remaining column viscosity CC and the column stiffness KC by performing identification thereof, all of machine constants for the individual compensating sections can be determined.
Identification methods for the above-described column viscosity CC and the column stiffness KC will be described below.
In this embodiment, an impact is applied to the column 3, and the column viscosity CC and the column stiffness KC are identified from response vibrations to this impact.
The identification of the column stiffness KC is performed on the basis of a resonance frequency of vibrations generated at the carriage 5 when the impact is applied to the column 3.
Accordingly, derivation of a computational expression for calculating the column stiffness KC from the resonance frequency will be described first.
In the machine system model shown in
−θLKR−θCJCs2=θLJLs2 (15)
θLKR−θC(KC+CCs)=θCJCs2 (16)
From expression (15),
θL=−θcJCs2/(JLs2+KR) (17)
From expressions (16) and (17),
−θc(JCs2KR)/(JLs2+KR)−θC(KC+CCs)=θcJCs2
JCs2+CCs+KC+(JCs2KR)/(JLs2+KR)=0
JCs2(JLs2+KR)+(KC+CCs)*(JLs2+KR)+JCs2KR=0
JCJLs4+CCJLs3+(2JCKR+JLKC)s2+CCKRs+KRKC=0 (18)
At this time, by keeping only terms that are not related to the resonance frequency (CC is not related to the resonance), and by setting s to jω, the following expression (19) is obtained.
JCJLω4−(2JCKR+JLKC)ω2+KRKC=0 (19)
By solving the above-described expression (19) and, additionally, by rearranging it to an expression regarding the column stiffness KC, the following expression (20) is obtained.
KC=(8JC2JLKRω2−(2JCJL)2ω4/(−4JCJL2)ω2+4JCJLKR) (20)
By expressing the above-described expression (20) in terms of the resonance frequency q, the following expression (21) is obtained.
KC=JC(8KRq2−JLq4)/(KR−JLq2) (21)
In the above-described expression (21), KR is the feeding-system stiffness, JL is the carriage inertia, JC is the column inertia, and the q is the column resonance frequency; among these, the column inertia JC, the carriage inertia JL, and the feeding-system stiffness KR are known. Therefore, by detecting the column resonance frequency, the column stiffness KC can be identified in accordance with the above-described expression (21).
Next, the procedure for actually identifying the column stiffness KC using the above-described expression (21) will be described.
The impact generating section 51, for example, applies a predetermined impact in the Y-axis direction to the carriage 5. The predetermined impact is, for example, an impact like a step response. In this embodiment, as shown in
In the rectangular shape shown in
In the servo control for identifying the machine constants, the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 in the servo control device 100 are set to the off state so that the machine-deflection compensation, the column-reaction-force compensation, etc. are not performed.
The acceleration sensor 52 is mounted on the column 3 or the carriage 5, detects the vibrations of the carriage 5 due to the impact applied to the carriage 5 by the impact generating section 51, and outputs this detected signal to the column-stiffness identifying section 53 and the column-viscosity identifying section 54.
When the impact is applied to the carriage 5 by the impact generating section 51, the column-stiffness identifying section 53 determines the column resonance frequency q from the detected signal acquired by the acceleration sensor 52 and identifies the column stiffness KC by substituting it into the above-described expression (21).
When the impact is applied to the carriage 5 by the impact generating section 51, the column-viscosity identifying section 54 determines an attenuation rate of the vibrations from the detected signal acquired by the acceleration sensor 52 and identifies the column viscosity CC on the basis of this attenuation rate. An identification method of the column viscosity CC will be described below using
When attenuating vibrations as shown in
CC=δ*SQRT(JC*KC)/π
The machine-constant setting section 55 sets the column stiffness KC identified by the column-stiffness identifying section 53 and the column viscosity CC identified by the column-viscosity identifying section 54 in the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 in the velocity feedforward section 201. The machine-constant setting section 55 which holds a table in which machine states, such as a W-axis position, attachment, etc., and the machine constants other than the above-described column stiffness KC and the column viscosity CC are associated with each other, reads out machine constants corresponding to machine states at a given time, and sets the individual read-out machine constants in the machine-deflection compensation section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 in the velocity feedforward section 201.
Then, once all of the machine constants of the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 in the velocity feedforward section 201 are set in this way, the servo control device 100 activates the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 and performs positioning control using these compensation models.
As has been described above, with the servo control device according to this embodiment, not only the machine-deflection compensating section 200 that performs compensation for positioning-control errors due to the vibrations of the column 3, but also the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 that performs compensation for positioning-control errors due to vibrations of the carriage 5 caused by the reaction force of the column 3 is provided; therefore, the vibrations of the carriage 5 due to the reaction force of the column 3 can be compensated for, and positioning control of the carriage 5 can be performed at a high precision even when the column 3 is vibrating.
In this test, a jig (angle plate) having a thickness of 500 mm was disposed on a top surface of a table shown in
As described above, even when constants of the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 are set by the constant identifying section 50, it is conceivable that the set constants are not appropriate, that the carriage 5 still vibrates even when these compensating sections are activated, and that the precision of the positioning control is deteriorated.
Therefore, in a servo control device according to a second embodiment, in order to check whether or not the constants that have already been set are appropriate, an impact in the Y-axis direction is applied to the carriage 5 by the impact generating section 51 in a state in which the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 are activated, and the vibration conditions of the carriage 5 at this time are checked using a detected signal from the acceleration section 52. When amplitudes of the vibrations in the detected signal from the acceleration section 52, in this case, exceed a predetermined threshold, the machine constants that have already been set are adjusted. Accordingly, as shown in
When the vibration determining section 56 determines that the amplitudes of the vibrations of the carriage 5 based on the detected signal from the acceleration sensor 52 exceed the predetermined threshold, the constant adjusting section 57 adjusts the machine constants that have already been set by the machine-constant setting section 55. Specifically, when vibrations immediately after an impact is applied are relatively large, the constant adjusting section 57 applies changes in a direction that increases the column viscosity CC, and, when the vibrations become relatively large some time after the impact is applied, the machine constants are adjusted by changing a compensation frequency. Then, when the machine constants are changed, the adjustment of the machine constants is repeated by performing the same procedure again until it is determined by the vibration determining section 56 that the amplitudes of the vibrations of the carriage 5 are at or below the predetermined threshold.
In this way, the servo control device according to this embodiment possesses means to check whether or not the machine constants that have already been set are appropriate, and the adjustment of the machine constants is repeated until a determination result that the machine constants are appropriate is obtained; therefore, the precision of positioning control of the carriage 5 can be improved.
In this embodiment, it is necessary to mount the acceleration sensor 52 on the carriage 5. This is because the column 3 still vibrates, although the precision of positioning control of the carriage 5 is improved by activating the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311. Therefore, if the acceleration sensor 52 is attached to the column 3, effects of the positioning compensation by the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 cannot be checked, and thus, it is also not possible to determine whether or not the machine constants are appropriate.
In the first embodiment and the second embodiment described above, the carriage 5 is intentionally vibrated by applying an external impact thereto, and the machine constants are identified on the basis of the conditions of these vibrations.
As opposed to this, this embodiment assumes a state in which the machine constants have already been set, and the machine constants are gradually adjusted when the precision of positioning control is deteriorating in a state in which positioning control by the servo control device is being performed, in other words, in a state in which the machine tool is being driven.
Specifically, the servo control device according to this embodiment is provided with a machine-constant adjusting section 60. As shown in
With such a machine-constant adjusting section 60, upon receiving the instructed position θ (Step SA1 in
As a result, when the frequency of the signal from the column resonance model 61 side is larger than the frequency of the signal from the acceleration sensor 52 side, the adjusting section 64 decreases the column stiffness KC by a predetermined amount. On the other hand, when the frequency of the signal from the column resonance model 61 side is smaller than the frequency of the signal from the acceleration sensor 52 side, the adjustment 64 increases the column stiffness KC by a predetermined amount (Step SA4 in
Next, when it is determined that the two frequencies match each other, the amplitudes of the two are subsequently compared at the adjusting section 64 (Step SA6 in
Then, when it is determined that the two amplitudes match each other, the processing returns to Step SA1 and the above-described processing is repeated.
As has been described above, with the servo control device according to this embodiment, whether or not the machine constants in the machine-deflection compensating section 200 and the column-reaction-force compensating section 311 are set to appropriate values is checked at certain time intervals even during a normal driving state, and, if not appropriate, adjustments to appropriate values are performed; therefore, it is possible to constantly maintain the precision of positioning control of the carriage 5 at or above a predetermined precision.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2009-147730 | Jun 2009 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2010/059871 | 6/10/2010 | WO | 00 | 7/26/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/150663 | 12/29/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4396975 | Kurakake | Aug 1983 | A |
4525659 | Imahashi et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
5008606 | Koehler et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5038090 | Kawabata et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5374883 | Morser | Dec 1994 | A |
5504407 | Wakui et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5525877 | Umida | Jun 1996 | A |
5660255 | Schubert et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5704250 | Black | Jan 1998 | A |
5714860 | Makinouchi | Feb 1998 | A |
5757149 | Sato et al. | May 1998 | A |
5823307 | Schubert et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5952804 | Hamamura et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959427 | Watson | Sep 1999 | A |
6170622 | Wakui et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6281643 | Ebihara | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6744233 | Tsutsui | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6998810 | Kameyama | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7063192 | Mayama | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7130026 | Sugawara et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7154242 | Asano | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7181294 | Nihei et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
8508171 | Miyaji | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513906 | Shilpiekandula et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20020060545 | Inagaki et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20040114116 | Asano | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119428 | Abe et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040183494 | Nagaoka et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050033460 | Tanahashi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052149 | Kameyama | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050061065 | Terpstra | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050174554 | Sugawara et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070040529 | Takebayashi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070188117 | Shoda et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070278980 | Wilson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20100302526 | Saiki | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110046795 | Fujimoto et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120194121 | Miyaji | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1523465 | Aug 2004 | CN |
1505463 | Feb 2005 | EP |
7-110716 | Apr 1995 | JP |
8-6644 | Jan 1996 | JP |
9-198114 | Jul 1997 | JP |
11-184529 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-309649 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-176788 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-322116 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-30136 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-202136 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2004-272883 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-56254 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2007-25961 | Feb 2007 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2009-147730 mailed Mar. 12, 2013 with English Translation. |
Hori et al., “Slow Resonance Ratio Control for Vibration Suppression and Disturbance Rejection in Torsional System”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 46, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 162-168. |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080005980.4 issued Oct. 29, 2012 with Englsih translation. |
Decision to Grant a Patent for European Patent Application No. 10791981.3-1807 issued Oct. 23, 2013. |
Decision to Grant a Patent for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 099119705 issued Oct. 30, 2013. |
Decision to Grant a Patent for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2011-7017166 issued Nov. 20, 2013 with an English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110285340 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |