Servo loop for well bias voltage source

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7847619
  • Patent Number
    7,847,619
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 22, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 7, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
A servo loop for a charge pump including comparator. A variable resistor and comparator are in series and couple the output of the charge pump to an enable input. A current source/sink coupled to the variable resistor provide a first input voltage to the comparator, with the second input of the comparator being coupled to ground or Vdd. A shunt circuit in parallel with the load at the output of the charge pump is also coupled to the output of the comparator. The charge pump and shunt are alternately enabled and disabled by the comparator to maintain a body-bias supply voltage. The servo loop may be configured to provide body-bias for NFETs or PFETs.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention relate to circuits for providing operational voltages in complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) circuits. In particular, embodiments of the present invention relate to control circuits for body-bias charge pumps.


BACKGROUND ART

As the operating voltages for CMOS transistor circuits have decreased, variations in the threshold voltages for the transistors have become more significant. Although low operating voltages offer the potential for reduced power consumption, threshold voltage variations due to process and environmental variables often prevent optimum efficiency and performance from being achieved due to increased leakage currents.


Prior Art FIG. 1A shows a conventional CMOS inverter 100. A P-type substrate 105 supports an NFET 110 and a PFET 120. The NFET 110 comprises a gate 112, source 113, and drain 114. The PFET 120 resides in an n-well 115, and comprises a gate 122, drain 123, and a source 124. The substrate 105 and source 113 are coupled by a tie 130 that is connected to ground (GND), while source 124 and N-well 115 are coupled by a tie 135 that is connected to a supply voltage (VDD). The input to the inverter is applied to the gates 112 and 122, with the output taken from the drain contact 125. In this conventional configuration, the transistors are often treated as three terminal devices.


Threshold voltage variations may be compensated for by body-biasing. Body-biasing introduces a reverse bias potential between the bulk and the source of the transistor that allows the threshold voltage of the transistor to be adjusted electrically. The purpose of body-biasing is to compensate for 1) process variations; 2) temperature variations; 3) supply voltage variations; 4) changes in frequency of operation; and 5) changing levels of switching activity.


Prior Art FIG. 1B shows an inverter having connections for body-biasing. Body-bias can provided to the PFET 120 through a direct bias contact 150a, or by a buried n-well 140 using contact 150b. Similarly, body-bias may be provided to the NFET 110 by a surface contact 155a, or by a backside contact 155b. An aperture 145 may be provided in the buried n-well 125 so that the bias potential reaches the NFET 110. In general, a PFET 120 or an NFET 110 may be biased by one of the alternative contacts shown.


Depending upon the environmental and operational conditions, a CMOS circuit may require different levels of bias for the transistors. For example, a microprocessor that is executing a computationally intensive routine for a real-time application will typically be biased for maximum speed, whereas during periods of low activity the bias will be adjusted to minimize leakage current.


For a CMOS integrated circuit, the load presented to a circuit providing a body-bias voltage and the bias circuit itself may vary with the environmental and operational conditions of integrated circuit. Thus, the variations in the required body-bias voltage and the load to which it is applied should be taken into account to achieve optimum performance.


Charge pumps are frequently used in integrated circuits to provide a voltage that is larger than the voltage supplied to the integrated circuit. For example, charge pumps are used in certain types of non-volatile memory to provide operating voltages. These operating voltages are typically not subject to the close tolerances that apply to body-bias voltages for threshold voltage adjustment.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Thus, a need exists for a system for controlling a charge pump to provide a precise body-bias voltage for transistors in CMOS circuits.


Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention provides a system that uses a servo loop to control a charge pump to produce a desired body-bias voltage. The system accept an input reference voltage that is related to the desired output and can be configured for either NFETs or PFETs.


In an embodiment of the present invention for providing a body-bias for NFETs, the output of a negative charge pump is coupled to a current source by a variable resistor. A first input terminal of a comparator is coupled to the node between the resistor and the current source, and a second input is connected to ground. The output of the comparator is coupled to enable an input of the charge pump, and an enable input of a shunt circuit that is in parallel with a load on the output of the charge pump.


In an embodiment of the present invention for providing a body-bias for PFETs, the output of a positive charge pump is coupled to a current sink at ground by a variable resistor. A first input terminal of a comparator is coupled to a power supply Vdd as a reference, and a second input is coupled to the node between the resistor and the current source. The output of the comparator is coupled to enable an input of the charge pump, and an enable input of a shunt circuit that is in parallel with a load on the output of the charge pump.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention:


Prior Art FIG. 1A shows a conventional CMOS inverter without body-bias connections.


Prior Art FIG. 1B shows a conventional CMOS inverter with body-bias connections.



FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a feedback controlled body-bias circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present claimed invention.



FIG. 3 shows a circuit diagram of a negative body-bias supply with a servo loop for NFETs in accordance with an embodiment of the present claimed invention.



FIG. 4 shows a circuit diagram of a positive body-bias supply with a servo loop for PFETs in accordance with an embodiment of the present claimed invention.



FIG. 5A shows a circuit diagram of a servo loop with a negative body-bias supply applied to an NFET in accordance with an embodiment of the present claimed invention.



FIG. 5B shows a circuit diagram of a servo loop with a positive body-bias supply applied to a PFET in accordance with an embodiment of the present claimed invention.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the following detailed description of the present invention, a feedback-controlled body-bias circuit, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be obvious to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances well known methods, procedures, components, and circuit elements have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows a block diagram 200 of an embodiment of the present invention. A charge pump 210 has an output coupled to Cload that represents a substrate or well. Since body-bias is typically applied as a reverse bias to a p-n junction within a CMOS device, the load seen by the body-bias voltage source is generally a capacitive load, however, there is a certain amount of leakage current, represented by Rleak.


An output monitor 205 has a sense input coupled to the output of the charge pump 210. The output of the charge pump is compared to a reference voltage Vref by the output monitor 205. Upon sensing a positive or negative deviation (over-voltage or under-voltage) that exceeds an allowed value, the output monitor provides a control signal to the charge pump circuit 210 and/or a shunt circuit 215.


For an over-voltage condition with loads having a large Cload and large Rleak (small leakage current), simply turning off the charge pump may not result in a sufficiently fast discharge of Cload to the desired value. Accordingly, the shunt 215 may be enabled to provide a discharge path that allows faster correction of the output voltage Vout. FIG. 2 is described in previously incorporated co-pending patent application entitled “Feedback Controlled Body-Bias Voltage Source.”



FIG. 3 shows a circuit diagram 300 of a negative body-bias supply with a servo loop for NFETs in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The current source 305 is coupled to the output of the negative charge pump circuit 315 by a variable resistor R. An equivalent load circuit is shown having an Rleak in parallel with a Cload. The negative charge pump circuit 315 and shunt 320 have enable inputs coupled to the output of comparator 310.


The variable resistor R, Shunt 320, comparator 310 and current source 305 are elements of the servo loop that controls the voltage Vpw at the output of the charge pump 315. The basic servo loop feedback is provided by the comparator. Vpw is equal to −IR with respect to the virtual ground at the (+) input of the comparator 310. In a particular embodiment, I is preferably about 10 microamperes.


The magnitude of the voltage drop IR may be adjusted by adjusting the variable resistor R. A description of the variable resistor R shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 is provided in the previously incorporated co-pending patent application entitled “A Precise Control Component for a Substrate Potential Regulation Circuit.”


When the virtual ground potential at the (+) input is above the reference ground potential at the (−) input of the comparator 310, the comparator output is high, enabling the negative charge pump 315 and disabling the shunt 320. With the charge pump on, Vpw is forced lower.


In order to lower Vpw, the charge pump 315 must be able to sink a current that is greater than the output of the current source 305. For sufficiently large values of Rleak, Vpw may tend to rise due to charging of Cload by the current source 305 when the charge pump 315 is off.


Due to the action of the charge pump 315, the virtual ground potential will drop until the virtual ground potential is slightly below the reference ground potential. At this point the comparator output is switched low and the charge pump 315 is disabled and the shunt is enabled. The enabling of the shunt reduces the voltage across Cload.


Although the potential across Cload will tend to drop when the charge pump is turned off due to the presence of Rleak, The shunt provides a faster forced response. The servo loop produces a cycling behavior to maintain Vpw at −IR, in which the charge pump and shunt are alternately enabled and disabled.


In one embodiment, the comparator 315 may be designed with a hysteresis characteristic to provide a dead-band in which neither the charge pump or shunt are enabled. Alternatively, the shunt 320 may be designed with a delay at the enable input.


In one embodiment, the current source 305 sources a current of about 10 microamperes and the shunt 320 and charge pump 315 are cycled at a frequency of about 40 MHz when coupled to a Cload of less than 100 nanofarads (e.g., about 75 nanofarads).



FIG. 4 shows a circuit diagram 400 of a positive body-bias supply with a servo loop for PFETs in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. A current sink 405 is coupled to the output of the negative charge pump circuit 415 by a variable resistor R. An equivalent load circuit is shown having an Rleak in parallel with a Cload. The positive charge pump circuit 415 and shunt 420 have enable inputs coupled to the output of comparator 310.


The variable resistor R, Shunt 420, comparator 410 and current sink (negative source) 405 are the elements making up the servo loop that controls the voltage Vnw at the output of the charge pump 415. Vnw is equal to Vdd+IR with respect to ground. In a particular embodiment, I is preferably about 10 microamperes.


The comparator 410 has Vsupply that limits the available range of Vdd. For example, if Vsupply is equal to about 2.5 volts, the available range of Vdd is about 0.6 volts to 1.6 volts. In order to maximize the common mode input range of comparator 410 it is preferable to use a comparator that employs both PFETs and NFETs in its input stage.


When the virtual Vdd potential at the (−) input is below the reference Vdd potential at the (+) input of the comparator 410, the comparator output is high, enabling the positive charge pump 415 and disabling the shunt 420. With the charge pump on, Vnw is forced higher.


Due to the action of the charge pump 415, Vnw will rise until the virtual Vdd potential is slightly above the reference Vdd potential. At this point the comparator output is switched low and the charge pump 415 is disabled and the shunt is enabled. The enabling of the shunt reduces the voltage across Cload.


Although the potential across Cload will tend to drop when the charge pump is turned off due to the presence of Rleak, The shunt provides a faster forced response. The servo loop produces a cycling behavior to maintain Vnw at Vdd+IR, in which the charge pump and shunt are alternately enabled and disabled.


In one embodiment, the comparator 415 may be designed with a hysteresis characteristic to provide a dead-band in which neither the charge pump or shunt are enabled. Alternatively, the shunt 420 may be designed with a delay at the enable input.


Descriptions of the variable resistor R and shunt (320, 420) shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 are provided in the previously incorporated co-pending patent applications entitled “A Precise Control Component for a Substrate Potential Regulation Circuit” and “A Charge Stabilizing Component for a Substrate Potential Regulation Circuit.”



FIG. 5A shows a circuit diagram of a servo loop with a negative body-bias supply used to reverse-bias a p-n junction in a CMOS device in accordance with an embodiment of the present claimed invention.



FIG. 5B shows a circuit diagram of a servo loop with a positive body-bias supply used to reverse-bias a p-n junction in a CMOS device in accordance with an embodiment of the present claimed invention.


The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. For example, an integrated circuit having a P-type substrate and an N-well disposed therein is described. More generally, the invention may be used with a semiconductor substrate of either N-type or P-type having a complementary well disposed therein. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A circuit comprising: a charge provider circuit operable to receive a control signal and operable to provide a charge to a body-bias voltage source of an integrated circuit responsive to said control signal;an output monitoring circuit operable to determine, independently of said control signal, whether a voltage at an output node of said charge provider circuit is an over-voltage or an under-voltage that is outside of an acceptable threshold value, wherein said output monitoring circuit is operable, independently of an external signal, to outputs said control signal which is operable to adjust said output node responsive to said determination; anda shunt circuit operable to provide a discharge path responsive to said control signal based on whether said voltage at said output node exceeds said acceptable threshold value,wherein said control signal causes said charge provider circuit to provide said charge to said body-bias voltage source based on whether said voltage at said output node is outside of said acceptable threshold value.
  • 2. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said charge provider circuit is a charge pump, and wherein said charge pump is coupled to a substrate.
  • 3. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said shunt circuit comprises an enable input delay.
  • 4. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said output monitoring circuit comprises a comparator.
  • 5. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said output monitoring circuit comprises both NFETs and PFETs in an input stage.
  • 6. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said output of said output monitoring circuit is coupled to said charge provider circuit.
  • 7. A voltage source comprising: a negative charge provider circuit operable to receive a control signal and operable to provide a negative charge to a body-bias voltage source for an integrated circuit responsive to said control signal;a comparator operable to determine, independently of said control signal, whether a first voltage at a first input is greater than a reference voltage at a second input, wherein said first voltage is dependent on an output voltage at an output node of said negative charge provider circuit, wherein said comparator is operable, independently of an external signal, to output said control signal in response to said determination, and wherein a voltage of said body-bias voltage source is increased or decreased responsive to said control signal; anda shunt circuit coupled to an output of said comparator.
  • 8. The voltage source of claim 7, wherein said negative charge provider circuit comprises a negative charge pump, and further comprising: a current source coupled to said first input; anda variable resistor coupled between said current source and said negative charge pump, andwherein said negative charge pump is coupled to a substrate.
  • 9. The voltage source of claim 7, wherein said shunt circuit is also coupled to said negative charge provider circuit, and wherein said shunt circuit is operable to control said output voltage of said negative charge provider circuit responsive to said control signal.
  • 10. The voltage source of claim 9, wherein said shunt circuit is disabled if said negative charge provider circuit is enabled.
  • 11. The voltage source of claim 9, wherein said shunt circuit is operable to reduces said output voltage of said negative charge provider circuit.
  • 12. The voltage source of claim 9, wherein said shunt circuit is operable to provides increased response time of said output voltage.
  • 13. The voltage source of claim 9, wherein said shunt circuit is enabled if said negative charge provider circuit is disabled.
  • 14. The voltage source of claim 9, wherein said shunt circuit comprises a delay at an enable input.
  • 15. The voltage source of claim 7, wherein said output node of said negative charge provider circuit is coupled to a load comprising a reverse-biased p-n junction.
  • 16. A voltage source comprising: a positive charge provider circuit operable to receive a control signal and operable to provide a positive charge to a body-bias voltage source for an integrated circuit responsive to said control signal;a comparator operable to determine, independently of said control signal, whether a voltage of an input signal is lower than a reference voltage, wherein said voltage of said input signal is dependent on an output voltage at an output node of said positive charge provider circuit, wherein said comparator is operable, independently of an external signal, to outputs said control signal in response to said determination, and wherein a voltage of said body-bias voltage source is increased or decreased responsive to said control signal; anda shunt circuit coupled to an output of said comparator.
  • 17. The voltage source of claim 16, wherein said positive charge provider circuit comprises a positive charge pump, and further comprising: a current sink; anda variable resistor coupled to said current sink, wherein said variable resistor and said current sink are operable to control an output voltage of said positive charge pump, andwherein said positive charge pump is coupled to a substrate.
  • 18. The voltage source of claim 16, wherein said shunt circuit is also coupled to said positive charge provider circuit, and wherein said shunt circuit is operable to control said output voltage of said positive charge provider circuit responsive to said control signal.
  • 19. The voltage source of claim 18, wherein said shunt circuit is disabled if said positive charge provider circuit is enabled.
  • 20. The voltage source of claim 18, wherein said shunt circuit is operable to reduces said output voltage of said positive charge provider circuit.
  • 21. The voltage source of claim 18, wherein said shunt circuit is operable to provides increased response time of said output voltage.
  • 22. The voltage source of claim 18, wherein said shunt circuit is enabled if said positive charge provider circuit is disabled.
  • 23. The voltage source of claim 18, wherein said shunt circuit comprises a delay at an enable input.
  • 24. The voltage source of claim 16, wherein said comparator comprises both NFETs and PFETs in an input stage.
  • 25. The voltage source of claim 16, wherein said output node of said positive charge provider circuit is coupled to a load comprising a reverse-biased p-n junction.
  • 26. A circuit comprising: means for providing a charge to a body-bias voltage source of an integrated circuit responsive to a control signal, wherein said means for providing receives said control signal;means for determining, independently of said control signal, whether a voltage at an output node of said means for providing said charge is an over-voltage or an under-voltage that is outside of an acceptable threshold value, wherein said means for determining, independently of an external signal, outputs said control signal which is operable to adjust said output node responsive to said determination, and wherein said control signal causes said means for providing said charge to provide said charge to said body-bias voltage source based on whether said voltage at said output node is outside of said acceptable threshold value; andmeans for providing a discharge path responsive to said control signal based on whether said voltage at said output node exceeds said acceptable threshold value.
  • 27. The circuit of claim 26, wherein said means for providing said charge is a charge pump, and wherein said charge pump is coupled to a substrate.
  • 28. The circuit of claim 26, wherein said means for providing said discharge path comprises an enable input delay.
  • 29. The circuit of claim 26, wherein said means for determining comprises means for comparing.
  • 30. The circuit of claim 26, wherein said means for determining comprises both NFETs and PFETs in an input stage.
  • 31. The circuit of claim 26, wherein an output of said means for determining is coupled to said means for providing said charge.
RELATED UNITED STATES PATENT APPLICATIONS

This Continuation Application claims the benefit of the commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/591,431, filed on Oct. 31, 2006, by Tien-Min Chen, and entitled “SERVO LOOP FOR WELL BIAS VOLTAGE SOURCE,” now issued as a U.S. Pat. No. 7,362,165, which is a Continuation Application that claims the benefit of the commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/747,015, filed on Dec. 23, 2003, by Tien-Min Chen, and entitled “SERVO LOOP FOR WELL BIAS VOLTAGE SOURCE,” now issued as a U.S. Pat. No. 7,129,771, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/747,016 by Tien-Min Chen, et al., filed on Dec. 23, 2003, entitled “Feedback Controlled Body-Bias Voltage Source.” now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,649,402, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/746,539 by Tien-Min Chen and Robert Fu, filed on Dec. 23, 2003, entitled “A Precise Control Component for a Substrate Potential Regulation Circuit,” now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,692,477, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention. This Application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/747,022 by Tien-Min Chen, filed on Dec. 23, 2003, entitled “A Charge Stabilizing Component for a Substrate Potential Regulation Circuit” now issued as a U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,461, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.

US Referenced Citations (204)
Number Name Date Kind
4246517 Dakroub Jan 1981 A
4471290 Yamaguchi Sep 1984 A
4769784 Doluca et al. Sep 1988 A
4798974 Reczek et al. Jan 1989 A
4912347 Morris Mar 1990 A
4929621 Manoury et al. May 1990 A
5039877 Chern Aug 1991 A
5086501 DeLuca et al. Feb 1992 A
5113088 Yamamoto et al. May 1992 A
5124632 Greaves Jun 1992 A
5167024 Smith et al. Nov 1992 A
5201059 Nguyen Apr 1993 A
5204863 Saint-Joigny et al. Apr 1993 A
5218704 Watts, Jr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5230055 Katz et al. Jul 1993 A
5239652 Seibert et al. Aug 1993 A
5254883 Horowitz et al. Oct 1993 A
5336986 Allman Aug 1994 A
5347172 Cordoba et al. Sep 1994 A
5386135 Nakazato et al. Jan 1995 A
5394026 Yu et al. Feb 1995 A
5406212 Hashinaga et al. Apr 1995 A
5422591 Rastegar et al. Jun 1995 A
5422806 Chen et al. Jun 1995 A
5440520 Schutz et al. Aug 1995 A
5447876 Moyer et al. Sep 1995 A
5461266 Koreeda et al. Oct 1995 A
5483434 Seesink Jan 1996 A
5495184 Des Rosiers et al. Feb 1996 A
5502838 Kikinis Mar 1996 A
5506541 Herndon Apr 1996 A
5511203 Wisor et al. Apr 1996 A
5519309 Smith May 1996 A
5560020 Nakatani et al. Sep 1996 A
5592173 Lau et al. Jan 1997 A
5682093 Kivela Oct 1997 A
5692204 Rawson et al. Nov 1997 A
5694072 Hsiao et al. Dec 1997 A
5717319 Jokinen Feb 1998 A
5719800 Mittal et al. Feb 1998 A
5727208 Brown Mar 1998 A
5744996 Kotzle et al. Apr 1998 A
5745375 Reinhardt et al. Apr 1998 A
5752011 Thomas et al. May 1998 A
5754869 Holzhammer et al. May 1998 A
5757171 Babcock May 1998 A
5778237 Yamamoto et al. Jul 1998 A
5781060 Sugawara Jul 1998 A
5812860 Horden et al. Sep 1998 A
5815724 Mates Sep 1998 A
5818290 Tsukada Oct 1998 A
5825674 Jackson Oct 1998 A
5838189 Jeon Nov 1998 A
5842860 Funt Dec 1998 A
5848281 Smalley et al. Dec 1998 A
5884049 Atkinson Mar 1999 A
5894577 MacDonald et al. Apr 1999 A
5900773 Susak May 1999 A
5920226 Mimura Jul 1999 A
5923545 Nguyen Jul 1999 A
5929621 Angelici et al. Jul 1999 A
5933649 Lim et al. Aug 1999 A
5940020 Ho Aug 1999 A
5940785 Georgiou et al. Aug 1999 A
5940786 Steeby Aug 1999 A
5952871 Jeon Sep 1999 A
5974557 Thomas et al. Oct 1999 A
5986947 Choi et al. Nov 1999 A
5996083 Gupta et al. Nov 1999 A
5996084 Watts Nov 1999 A
5999040 Do et al. Dec 1999 A
6006169 Sandhu et al. Dec 1999 A
6018264 Jin Jan 2000 A
6021500 Wang et al. Feb 2000 A
6035407 Gebara et al. Mar 2000 A
6047248 Georgiou et al. Apr 2000 A
6048746 Burr Apr 2000 A
6075404 Shindoh et al. Jun 2000 A
6078084 Nakamura et al. Jun 2000 A
6078319 Bril et al. Jun 2000 A
6087820 Houghton et al. Jul 2000 A
6087892 Burr Jul 2000 A
6091283 Murgula et al. Jul 2000 A
6100751 De et al. Aug 2000 A
6118306 Orton et al. Sep 2000 A
6119241 Michail et al. Sep 2000 A
6141762 Nicol et al. Oct 2000 A
6157092 Hofmann Dec 2000 A
6202104 Ober Mar 2001 B1
6215235 Osamura Apr 2001 B1
6216235 Thomas et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218708 Burr Apr 2001 B1
6226335 Prozorov May 2001 B1
6229379 Okamoto May 2001 B1
6232830 Fournel May 2001 B1
6259612 Itoh Jul 2001 B1
6272642 Pole, II et al. Aug 2001 B2
6279048 Fadavi-Ardekani et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281716 Mihara Aug 2001 B1
6303444 Burr Oct 2001 B1
6304824 Bausch et al. Oct 2001 B1
6305407 Selby Oct 2001 B1
6311287 Dischler et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314522 Chu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320453 Manning Nov 2001 B1
6337593 Mizuno et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345362 Bertin et al. Feb 2002 B1
6345363 Levy-Kendler Feb 2002 B1
6347379 Dai et al. Feb 2002 B1
6370046 Nebrigic et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373323 Kuroda Apr 2002 B2
6373325 Kuriyama Apr 2002 B1
6378081 Hammond Apr 2002 B1
6388432 Uchida May 2002 B2
6415388 Browning et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424203 Bayadroun Jul 2002 B1
6424217 Kwong Jul 2002 B1
6425086 Clark et al. Jul 2002 B1
6427211 Watts, Jr. Jul 2002 B2
6442746 James et al. Aug 2002 B1
6457135 Cooper Sep 2002 B1
6466077 Miyazaki et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469573 Kanda et al. Oct 2002 B2
6476632 La Rosa et al. Nov 2002 B1
6477654 Dean et al. Nov 2002 B1
6486729 Imamiya Nov 2002 B2
6487668 Thomas et al. Nov 2002 B2
6489224 Burr Dec 2002 B1
6496027 Sher et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496057 Wada et al. Dec 2002 B2
6510400 Moriyama Jan 2003 B1
6510525 Nookala et al. Jan 2003 B1
6513124 Furuichi et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518828 Seo et al. Feb 2003 B2
6519706 Ogoro Feb 2003 B1
6529421 Marr et al. Mar 2003 B1
6531912 Katou Mar 2003 B2
6563371 Buckley, III et al. May 2003 B2
6570371 Volk May 2003 B1
6574577 Stapleton et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574739 Kung et al. Jun 2003 B1
6600346 Macaluso Jul 2003 B1
6617656 Lee et al. Sep 2003 B2
6642774 Li Nov 2003 B1
6675360 Cantone et al. Jan 2004 B1
6677643 Iwamoto et al. Jan 2004 B2
6700434 Fujii et al. Mar 2004 B2
6731221 Dioshongh et al. May 2004 B1
6737909 Jaussi et al. May 2004 B2
6741118 Uchikoba et al. May 2004 B2
6771115 Nakano Aug 2004 B2
6774705 Miyazaki et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784722 Tang et al. Aug 2004 B2
6791146 Lai et al. Sep 2004 B2
6791212 Pulvirenti et al. Sep 2004 B2
6792379 Ando Sep 2004 B2
6803633 Mergens et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809968 Marr et al. Oct 2004 B2
6865116 Kim et al. Mar 2005 B2
6882172 Suzuki et al. Apr 2005 B1
6889331 Soerensen et al. May 2005 B2
6906582 Kase et al. Jun 2005 B2
6917240 Trafton et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922783 Knee et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927620 Senda Aug 2005 B2
6936898 Pelham et al. Aug 2005 B2
6967522 Chandrakasan et al. Nov 2005 B2
6986068 Togawa Jan 2006 B2
6992508 Chow Jan 2006 B2
7012461 Chen et al. Mar 2006 B1
7030681 Yamazaki et al. Apr 2006 B2
7100061 Halepete et al. Aug 2006 B2
7119604 Chih Oct 2006 B2
7120804 Tschanz et al. Oct 2006 B2
7228242 Read et al. Jun 2007 B2
7562233 Sheng et al. Jul 2009 B1
20010028577 Sung et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020011650 Nishizawa et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020026597 Dai et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020067638 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020073348 Tani Jun 2002 A1
20020083356 Dai Jun 2002 A1
20020087219 Dai Jul 2002 A1
20020087896 Cline et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020116650 Halepete et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020130701 Kleveland Sep 2002 A1
20020138778 Cole et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140494 Thomas et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020194509 Plante et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030006590 Aoki et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030036876 Fuller, III et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065960 Rusu et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030071657 Soerensen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074591 McClendon et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030098736 Uchikoba et al. May 2003 A1
20030189465 Abadeer et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040010330 Chen Jan 2004 A1
20040025061 Lawrence Feb 2004 A1
20040073821 Naveh et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103330 Bonnett May 2004 A1
20040108881 Bokui et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040246044 Myono et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050225376 Kin Law Oct 2005 A1
20070283176 Tobias et al. Dec 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
0381021 Aug 1990 EP
0474963 Mar 1992 EP
0501655 Sep 1992 EP
0504655 Sep 1992 EP
0624909 Nov 1994 EP
0978781 Apr 2003 EP
1398639 Mar 2004 EP
63223480 Sep 1988 JP
04114365 Apr 1992 JP
409185589 Jul 1997 JP
11-118845 Apr 1999 JP
2000172383 Oct 2001 JP
2001345693 Dec 2001 JP
2003324735 Nov 2003 JP
0127728 Apr 2001 WO
0238828 May 2002 WO
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11591431 Oct 2006 US
Child 12107733 US
Parent 10747015 Dec 2003 US
Child 11591431 US