Set of glenoid components for a shoulder prosthesis

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10631993
  • Patent Number
    10,631,993
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 3, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 28, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
This set comprises glenoid components that each include a body defining, on two of its opposite faces, respectively, a joint surface, intended to cooperate with a humeral head, and a bearing surface bearing against the socket of a shoulder blade. In this set, the glenoid components are provided in several different sizes, respectively defined by the dimensions of the joint surface of their body. At least two glenoid components of which the bearing surfaces respectively have different dimensional geometries are provided so as to allow the surgeon to improve the durability of the mechanical cooperation between the implanted component and the operated socket.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments of the present invention relate to a set of glenoid components for a shoulder prosthesis.


BACKGROUND

Typically, the body of a glenoid component is not very thick, the two opposite primary faces of said body respectively being adapted to cooperate in a ball-and-socket manner with a humeral head, either natural or prosthetic, and to be pressed against the socket of a shoulder blade so as to be immobilized there. To that end, the first aforementioned face includes a joint surface, generally spherical, while the second face includes a bearing surface, which is also spherical or planar, in the central region of which often at least one bone anchoring element protrudes in the socket, such as a keel or pins. Such glenoid components may be provided in different sizes, but the glenoid components of different sizes often have identical bearing surfaces.


Thus, depending in particular on the patient's morphology, the surgeon has the option of choosing the glenoid component of which the size seems best suited to the patient. As a result, the articular performance of the patient's prosthetic shoulder is quite often satisfactory. At the same time, it has, however, been observed that, during use of glenoid components which did not best suit the patient, the implanted glenoid component tends gradually to come unsealed from the socket, through wear or mechanical alteration of the interface between the body and the socket.


SUMMARY

A set of glenoid components for use in a joint according to embodiments of the present invention includes a first glenoid component having a first joint surface and a first bearing surface, and a second glenoid component having a second joint surface and a second bearing surface, wherein each of the first and second joint surfaces is configured to cooperate with a prosthetic or natural bone head, wherein each of the first and second bearing surfaces is configured for placement against a socket of the joint, wherein the first joint surface is substantially the same as the second joint surface, and wherein the first and second bearing surfaces have different dimensional geometries. Both the first and second bearing surfaces may include substantially convex curved surfaces. The first bearing surface may have a first radius of curvature, and the second bearing surface may have a second radius of curvature that is greater than the first radius of curvature. The second radius of curvature is at least 4 mm greater, or 8 mm greater, than the first radius of curvature, according to embodiments of the present invention.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the first and second glenoid components are of a first size, and the set further includes a third glenoid component having a third joint surface and a third bearing surface, a fourth glenoid component having a fourth joint surface and a fourth bearing surface, wherein each of the third and fourth joint surfaces is also configured to cooperate with the prosthetic or natural bone head, wherein each of the third and fourth bearing surfaces is also configured for placement against the socket of the joint, wherein the third and fourth glenoid components are of a second size larger than the first size, wherein the third joint surface is substantially the same as the fourth joint surface, and wherein the third and fourth bearing surfaces have different dimensional geometries. The first bearing surface may have a first radius of curvature, the second bearing surface may have a second radius of curvature that is greater than the first radius of curvature, the third bearing surface may have a third radius of curvature, and the fourth bearing surface may have a fourth radius of curvature that is greater than the third radius of curvature, according to embodiments of the present invention. In some cases, the first radius of curvature may be the same as the third radius of curvature. In such cases, the second radius of curvature may be the same as the fourth radius of curvature. In other cases, the first radius of curvature may be smaller than the third radius of curvature, and/or the second radius of curvature may be smaller than the fourth radius of curvature.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the first and third bearing surfaces have identical dimensional geometries. According to other embodiments of the present invention, the different dimensional geometries are two different geometries selected from the group including a planar surface, a convex curved surface, a concave curved surface, and a terraced surface. At least one of the first and second bearing surfaces may include a protruding anchor element configured for engagement with the socket of the joint.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the first glenoid component includes a first top face and a first bottom face, the first top face including the first joint surface, the first bottom face including the first bearing surface, wherein the first bearing surface occupies most or all of the first bottom face other than an anchor element, if any. According to some embodiments of the present invention, the joint is a shoulder joint, the socket is a shoulder blade socket, and the prosthetic or natural bone head is a prosthetic or natural humeral head.


A set according to embodiments of the present invention may further include a fifth glenoid component having a fifth joint surface and a fifth bearing surface, and a sixth glenoid component having a sixth joint surface and a sixth bearing surface, wherein each of the fifth and sixth joint surfaces is also configured to cooperate with the prosthetic or natural bone head, wherein each of the fifth and sixth bearing surfaces is also configured for placement against the socket of the joint, wherein the fifth and sixth glenoid components are of a third size larger than the second size, wherein the fifth joint surface is substantially the same as the sixth joint surface, and wherein the fifth and sixth bearing surfaces have different dimensional geometries. According to such embodiments, the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth glenoid components may be packaged together in a kit, for example within a common box or container.


According to some embodiments of the present invention, the first bearing surface has a first radius of curvature, the second bearing surface has a second radius of curvature that is greater than the first radius of curvature, the third bearing surface has a third radius of curvature, the fourth bearing surface has a fourth radius of curvature that is greater than the third radius of curvature, the fifth bearing surface has a fifth radius of curvature, and the sixth bearing surface has a sixth radius of curvature that is greater than the fifth radius of curvature. The first radius of curvature may be the same as the third radius of curvature but less than the fifth radius of curvature; and/or the second radius of curvature may be the same as the fourth radius of curvature but less than the sixth radius of curvature, according to embodiments of the present invention. In some cases, the fifth radius of curvature is at least 4 mm smaller, or at least 8 mm smaller, than the sixth radius of curvature.


A method for glenoid implantation according to embodiments of the present invention includes evaluating a geometrical shape of a patient's bone socket, selecting a glenoid component from a set of glenoid components, the set of glenoid components including at least two different sizes of glenoid components, with at least two glenoid components of each size having geometrically different bearing surfaces but similar joint surfaces, wherein selecting the glenoid component includes first selecting a size of the at least two different sizes, and then within the selected size selecting a best match of the geometrically different bearing surface with the geometrical shape of the patient's bone socket, and implanting the selected glenoid component in the patient's bone socket.


While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of a glenoid component of a set of glenoid components, according to embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the glenoid component of FIG. 1 along plane II of FIG. 1, according to embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 3 illustrates a set of glenoid components, according to embodiments of the present invention.





While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below. The intention, however, is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A set of glenoid implants according to embodiments of the present invention allows the surgeon to improve the durability of the mechanical cooperation between the implanted glenoid component and the socket of the patient. As such, embodiments of the present invention include a set of glenoid components of a shoulder prosthesis, including glenoid components that each include a body defining, on two of its opposite faces, respectively, a joint surface, intended to cooperate with a humeral head, prosthetic or natural, and a bearing surface bearing against the socket of a shoulder blade, in which set the glenoid components are provided in several different sizes, respectively defined by the dimensions of their respective joint surfaces, the set being characterized in that, in each size, at least two glenoid components are provided with bearing surfaces respectively having different dimensional geometries.


According to one embodiment of the present invention, the surgeon is provided with different sized glenoid components (e.g. at least two different sizes), each of which are available with respective support surfaces provided to be different from each other. In this way, to place a prosthesis in the shoulder of a given patient, the surgeon decides on the size of the glenoid component based on considerations related to the joint to be reestablished with the patient's humeral head, prosthetic or natural, then, given the size that the surgeon has selected, the surgeon chooses the glenoid component with the bearing surface best suited to the patient's glenoid, in its natural actual size or after having surgically prepared it. During surgery, the surgeon strives to keep the greatest possible amount of bone material actually present. Thus, use of embodiments of the present invention is counterintuitive to traditional dogma, according to which the surgeon must perform fairly substantial bone preparation operations for the patient's socket by removing a significant quantity of bone matter from the shoulder blade, to shape, in the patient's shoulder blade, a glenoid cavity adapted to the unique geometry and imposed on the glenoid bearing surface of the component that the surgeon has chosen by its size, e.g., as a function of its joint surface. Conversely, while leaving the surgeon the choice of a size for the glenoid component to be implanted, the glenoid component according to embodiments of the present invention allows the surgeon to take into account the actual state of the patient's glenoid. Furthermore, the bone state of patients' sockets varies within non-negligible proportions, in a manner not correlated to the joint cooperation to be reestablished using a shoulder prosthesis, according to embodiments of the present invention.


According to embodiments of the present invention, the differences between the bearing surfaces of the different glenoid components of a same size can follow the overall geometric size of these surfaces, or, for a given geometric shape, the dimensions of said geometric shape. Of course, the number of sizes present in the set according to embodiments of the invention as well as, within a same size, the number of glenoid components having different respective bearing surfaces, can be as large as desired.


Embodiments of a glenoid component may include a combination of one or more of the following features and/or characteristics, according to embodiments of the present invention:

    • the dimensional geometries, respectively provided to be different for at least two of the glenoid components having a same size, correspond to a same convex curved surface shape but have as many different curves;
    • the same convex curved surface shape is substantially spherical, so that said dimensional geometries, respectively provided to be different for at least two of the glenoid components having a same size, correspond to as many different curve radii;
    • for at least some sizes, the difference between the respective curve radii of the bearing surfaces of said at least two components having a same size is greater than 4 mm, or in some cases greater than 8 mm;
    • at least one of the curve radii, respectively provided to be different for a same size, has a value that is unchanged at least once when, among the sizes, one goes from a smaller size to a larger size;
    • at least one of the curve radii, respectively provided to be different for a same size, has a value that increases at least once when, among the sizes, one goes from a smaller size to a larger size;
    • the dimensional geometries, respectively provided to be different for at least two of the glenoid components having a same size, correspond to as many different geometric shapes selected from the group consisting of: a planar surface, a convex curved surface, a concave curved surface, and a terraced surface;
    • at least one of said dimensional geometries, respectively provided to be different for at least two of the glenoid components having a same size, is found identically in at least two of the different sizes;
    • at least one of the glenoid components of the set is provided with at least one anchor element in the socket of the shoulder blade, which protrudes from the bearing surface of said glenoid component;
    • the bearing surface of each of the glenoid components of the set occupies, outside the anchoring element(s) that may be present, most or all of the corresponding face of the body of the glenoid component.



FIGS. 1 and 2 show a glenoid prosthesis component S2. This component S2 has a primary body S2.1 that has sides, in two spatial dimensions, that are significantly larger than its side in its third spatial dimension, this third side thus corresponding to the thickness of the body. The body S2.1 therefore has two opposite primary faces, connected by a peripheral face embodying the aforementioned thickness of the body.


The body S2.1 can also be a single piece, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, or correspond to the fixed assembly of several parts. Furthermore, the body S2.1 is made from one or more materials having a suitable rigidity and strength to, as described in more detail below, both cooperate with a humeral head (not shown) and be securely fixed to the bone socket of a shoulder blade (also not shown in the figures).


One of the two aforementioned primary faces of the body S2.1 defines a joint surface S2.2 shaped to engage with the substantially complementary surface of the aforementioned humeral head. In practice, this humeral head is either natural, e.g. it corresponds to the natural upper epiphysis of the humerus associated with the shoulder blade, or prosthetic, e.g. it is defined by a humeral component of a shoulder prosthesis to which the glenoid component S2 belongs.


The joint surface S2.2 of the body S2.1 is substantially spherical, according to embodiments of the present invention. The corresponding curve radius is denoted RS. In the glenoid component shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, this joint surface S2.2 is concave. As a non-illustrated alternative, this joint surface may be convex. The joint surface S2.2 may occupy most of the corresponding face of the body S2.1, or all of said face, as for example illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, according to embodiments of the present invention. The other primary face of the body S2.1 is adapted to be securely fastened to the aforementioned socket. To that end, this face includes a bearing surface S2.3 on the socket, from the central region from which an anchoring keel S2.4 for anchoring in the socket extends. According to embodiments of the present invention, outside the anchor keel S2.4, the bearing surface S2.3 advantageously occupies most of the corresponding face of the body S2.1, or all of that face, as for example in the glenoid component illustrated in the figures.


As a non-illustrated alternative, bone anchoring elements other than the keel S2.4 can be provided, to replace or complement said keel. Likewise, such anchor elements can be completely absent, according to embodiments of the present invention. In the glenoid component shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the bearing surface S2.3 of the body S2.1 is substantially spherical, in other words, it corresponds to a sphere portion for which the curve radius is denoted rS2. The surfaces S2.2 and S2.3 may or may not be concentric. In the event they are not concentric, their respective geometric center may or may not be situated in a same median plane of the body S2.1, according to embodiments of the present invention.


According to some embodiments of the invention, the glenoid component S2, which is described in detail above with respect to FIGS. 1 and 2, belongs to a set J of six glenoid components, as shown in FIG. 3. Thus, in addition to the glenoid component S2, which appears in the upper right corner of FIG. 3, the set J comprises five other glenoid components, respectively referenced S1, M1, M2, L1 and L2.


Each of the components S1, M1, M2, L1 and L2 comprises a body S1.1, M1.1, M2.1, L1.1 and L2.1, which is functionally similar to the body S2.1 of the component S2. In particular, each body S1.1, M1.1, M2.1, L1.1, L2.1 has, opposite one another, a joint surface S1.2, M1.2, M2.2, L1.2 and L.2, functionally similar to the joint surface S2.2 of the component S2, and a bearing surface S1.3, M1.3, M2.3, L1.3, L2.3 functionally similar to the bearing surface S2.3 of the component S2.


Component S1 is the same size as component S2, in that their respective joint surfaces S1.2 and S2.2 have substantially the same dimensions. In particular, as shown in FIG. 3, these joint surfaces S1.2 and S2.2 are substantially spherical and have the same curve radius RS according to embodiments of the present invention. The components S1 and S2 thus form, within the set J, a group of size S. According to some embodiments of the present invention, the joint surfaces S1.2 and S2.2 are identical or have curved surfaces which are identical.


On the other hand, component S1 differs from component S2 by the dimensional geometry of its bearing surface S1.3 compared to that of the bearing surface S2.3 of component S2. In other words, the bearing surfaces S1.3 and S2.3 both have the same sphere portion shape, but their respective curve radii rS1 and rS2 are different: rS1 is smaller than rS2, according to embodiments of the present invention.


Likewise, components M1 and M2 are the same size and thus form, within the set J, a group of two components, referenced M in FIG. 3. By comparison to components S1 and S2, the joint surfaces M1.2 and M2.2 of components M1 and M2 have substantially the same dimensions, in particular, in the illustrated example, the same curve radius RM. The group of size M, containing components M1 and M2, differs from group S, containing components S1 and S2, in that the radius RM has a value greater than that of the radius RS, according to embodiments of the present invention.


Furthermore, as for components S1 and S2 in the group of size S, the bearing surfaces M1.3 and M2.3 of components M1 and M2 of the group of size M have different dimensional geometries, e.g. these bearing surfaces are both sphere portions for which the respective radii rM1 and rM2 are different, the value of the radius rM1 being smaller than the value of the radius rM2.


The radii rS1 and rM1 illustrated in FIG. 3 may have the same value and the radii rS2 and rM2 may also have the same value, according to embodiments of the present invention. In other words, when one goes from the group of size S to the group of size M, the curve radii rS1 and rM1 of the bearing surfaces S1.3 and M1.3 have an unchanged value, according to embodiments of the present invention. The same may be true for the bearing surfaces S2.3 and M2.3, according to embodiments of the present invention.


Lastly, by transposition of the preceding technical considerations relative to the components S1 and S2 of the group of size S and components M1 and M2 of the group of size M, components L1 and L2 constitute a group of size L, such that:

    • the joint surfaces L1.2 and L2.2 of the components L1 and L2 have substantially the same dimensions, in particular the same curve radius RL, which has a value strictly greater than that of the radius RM, according to embodiments of the present invention, and
    • the bearing surfaces L1.3 and L2.3 are both sphere portions having respective curve radii rL1 and rL2, the radius rL1 having a value below that of the radius rL2, according to embodiments of the present invention.


The radius rL1 may have a value greater than that of the radius rM1, but smaller than that of the radius rM2, according to embodiments of the present invention. And the radius rL2 may have a value greater than that of the radius rM2, according to embodiments of the present invention.


The radii of curvature RS, RM and RL may not only increase from size S to size M to size L, but the joint surfaces of the glenoid components of each of the groups with the same size may also differ by an increase in edge-to-edge expanse, for example in the plane of FIG. 3, according to embodiments of the present invention. This difference in the edge-to-edge expanse is optional, however, and is not present in all embodiments of glenoid component sets, according to embodiments of the present invention.


The glenoid components of the set J are broken down into three groups of different sizes: S, M and L, according to embodiments of the present invention. Depending on whether the surgeon chooses one of components S1 and S2 or one of components M1 and M2 or one of components L1 and L2, the joint behavior of the selected glenoid component, relative to the humeral head of the patient, is fixed. However, for each of sizes S, M and L, the surgeon's choice of one of the two available components allows him to account for the actual state of the patient's socket: in particular, the surgeon will choose the one of the two available components for which the curvature of the bearing surface is best suited to the actual geometric configuration of the socket, in particular to limit the extent of the prior preparation of the socket, thereby limiting the loss of bone substance, while also optimizing the extent of the bearing interface produced between the socket and the component selected during implantation thereof, according to embodiments of the present invention.


The difference between the radii of curvature of the bearing surfaces of the components of a same size is, for example, greater than or equal to 4 mm, according to embodiments of the present invention. According to other embodiments of the present invention, the difference between the radii of curvature of the bearing surfaces of the components of a same size is greater than or equal to 8 mm. Thus, one non-limiting example of numerical quantification related to the embodiment of the set J shown in FIG. 3 is as follows:

    • rS1=34 mm,
    • rS2=38 mm,
    • rM1=34 mm,
    • rM2=38 mm,
    • rL1=36 mm, and
    • rL2=44 mm.


Various arrangements and alternatives may be utilized for the set of glenoid components J. As one example, at least one of the three groups of different sizes S, M and L may include more than two glenoid components, the respective bearing surfaces of the at least three glenoid components respectively having different dimensional geometries. Likewise, the set can be provided with only two groups of different sizes, for example S and M, or S and L or M and L, according to embodiments of the present invention. The set can also include more than three groups of different sizes, according to embodiments of the present invention.


According to one alternative embodiment of the present invention (not shown), the difference of dimensional geometries between the bearing surfaces of the glenoid components of a same size does not correspond to a dimensional difference of a same geometric shape, as is the case for the set J, but this difference is based on the presence of as many different geometric shapes as there are glenoid components present in the group of a same size. In other words, within each group of a same size, one of the glenoid components has, for example, a planar bearing surface while the other glenoid component has a bearing surface with a convex curve, according to embodiments of the present invention. More generally, the respective bearing surfaces of the at least two glenoid components present in the aforementioned group then have different geometric shapes that are chosen from among at least a planar surface, a convex curved surface, a concave curved surface and a terraced surface, according to embodiments of the present invention.


Optionally, rather than being continuously smooth as in the figures, the bearing surfaces of the components of the set J can have a roughness, or even macro-aspects, such as grooves, pyramidal spurs, conical cells, and the like, to strengthen the immobilization of the component in the socket.


Although embodiments of the present invention are described with respect to shoulder joints, one of ordinary skill in the art, based on the disclosure provided herein, will recognize that similar sets of glenoid components may be used for other joints, for example hip joints, according to embodiments of the present invention.


Various modifications and additions can be made to the exemplary embodiments discussed without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, while the embodiments described above refer to particular features, the scope of this invention also includes embodiments having different combinations of features and embodiments that do not include all of the described features. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the scope of the claims, together with all equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A method for glenoid implantation in a shoulder, the method comprising: evaluating a geometrical shape of a patient's shoulder blade socket;selecting a glenoid component from a set of glenoid components, each glenoid component comprising a primary body and a bone anchoring element, the primary body comprising a joint surface configured to cooperate with a prosthetic or natural bone head and a bearing surface configured for placement against the patient's shoulder blade socket, the bone anchoring element extends from the bearing surface, the set of glenoid components comprising at least two different sizes of glenoid components, each size of glenoid components comprising at least two glenoid components having geometrically different bearing surfaces surrounding the bone anchoring element but geometrically similar joint surfaces, wherein selecting the glenoid component from the set of glenoid components comprises: first selecting a size of the at least two different sizes, andwithin the selected size, selecting a best match of the geometrically different bearing surface with the geometrical shape of the patient's shoulder blade socket; andimplanting the selected glenoid component in the patient's shoulder blade socket such that the bone anchoring element extends into the socket and the bearing surface surrounding the bone anchoring element is placed against the patient's shoulder blade socket.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the geometrically different bearing surfaces of the at least two glenoid components of each size has a different radii of curvature.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the different radii of curvature differ from each other by at least 4 mm.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the different radii of curvature differ from each other by at least 8 mm.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the similar joint surfaces of the at least two glenoid components of each size have a same radius of curvature.
  • 6. The method claim 1, wherein implanting the selected glenoid component comprising inserting the bone anchoring element of the selected glenoid component into the patient's shoulder blade socket.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the bone anchoring element is a keel.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the bone anchoring element is a pin.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the bearing surfaces of two different-sized glenoid components have a same radii of curvature.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the bearing surfaces of the set of glenoid components comprise convex curved surfaces.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the joint surfaces of the set of glenoid components comprise concave curved surfaces.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 58647 Oct 2010 FR national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/279,070, filed on Oct. 21, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,351,844, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/488,102, filed on May 19, 2011, and claims foreign priority to French Patent Application No. FR1058647, filed on Oct. 22, 2010, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (299)
Number Name Date Kind
3694820 Scales et al. Oct 1972 A
3815157 Skorecki et al. Jun 1974 A
3842442 Kolbel Oct 1974 A
3864758 Yakich Feb 1975 A
3869730 Skobel Mar 1975 A
3916451 Buechel et al. Nov 1975 A
3978528 Crep Sep 1976 A
3979778 Stroot Sep 1976 A
3992726 Freeman et al. Nov 1976 A
4003095 Gristina Jan 1977 A
4030143 Elloy et al. Jun 1977 A
4040131 Gristina Aug 1977 A
4054955 Seppo Oct 1977 A
4135517 Reale Jan 1979 A
4179758 Gristina Dec 1979 A
4206517 Pappas et al. Jun 1980 A
4261062 Amstutz et al. Apr 1981 A
4550450 Kinnett Nov 1985 A
4693723 Gabard Sep 1987 A
4822370 Schelhas Apr 1989 A
4846840 Leclercq et al. Jul 1989 A
4865605 Dines et al. Sep 1989 A
4865609 Roche Sep 1989 A
4892549 Figgie, III et al. Jan 1990 A
4919670 Dale et al. Apr 1990 A
4957510 Cremascoli Sep 1990 A
4963155 Lazerri et al. Oct 1990 A
4986833 Worland Jan 1991 A
5032132 Matsen, III et al. Jul 1991 A
5080673 Burkhead et al. Jan 1992 A
5080685 Bolesky et al. Jan 1992 A
5127920 MacArthur Jul 1992 A
5135529 Paxson et al. Aug 1992 A
5152797 Luckman et al. Oct 1992 A
5163961 Harwin Nov 1992 A
5171289 Tornier Dec 1992 A
5181928 Bolesky et al. Jan 1993 A
5192329 Christie et al. Mar 1993 A
5201882 Paxson Apr 1993 A
5206925 Nakazawa et al. Apr 1993 A
5222984 Forte Jun 1993 A
5226915 Bertin Jul 1993 A
5261914 Warren Nov 1993 A
5314479 Rockwood, Jr. et al. May 1994 A
5314485 Judet May 1994 A
5314487 Schryver et al. May 1994 A
5326359 Oudard Jul 1994 A
5330531 Cappana Jul 1994 A
5358526 Tornier Oct 1994 A
5383936 Kubein-Meesenburg et al. Jan 1995 A
5405399 Tornier Apr 1995 A
5425779 Schlosser et al. Jun 1995 A
5429639 Judet Jul 1995 A
5443519 Averill et al. Aug 1995 A
5458650 Carret et al. Oct 1995 A
5462563 Shearer et al. Oct 1995 A
5505731 Tornier Apr 1996 A
5507817 Craig et al. Apr 1996 A
5507818 McLaughlin Apr 1996 A
5507824 Lennox Apr 1996 A
5531793 Kelman et al. Jul 1996 A
5549682 Roy Aug 1996 A
5580352 Sekel Dec 1996 A
5591168 Judet et al. Jan 1997 A
5603715 Kessler Feb 1997 A
5662651 Tornier et al. Sep 1997 A
5676702 Ratron Oct 1997 A
5702447 Walch et al. Dec 1997 A
5702457 Walch et al. Dec 1997 A
5702478 Tornier Dec 1997 A
5702486 Craig et al. Dec 1997 A
5723018 Cyprien et al. Mar 1998 A
5728161 Camino et al. Mar 1998 A
5741335 Gerber et al. Apr 1998 A
5755807 Anstaett et al. May 1998 A
5766256 Oudard et al. Jun 1998 A
5800551 Williamson et al. Sep 1998 A
5824106 Fournol Oct 1998 A
5879395 Tornier et al. Mar 1999 A
5879405 Ries et al. Mar 1999 A
5902340 White et al. May 1999 A
5910171 Kummer et al. Jun 1999 A
5928285 Bigliani Jul 1999 A
5944758 Mansat et al. Aug 1999 A
5961555 Huebner Oct 1999 A
5984927 Wenstrom, Jr. et al. Nov 1999 A
6015437 Stossel Jan 2000 A
6033439 Camino et al. Mar 2000 A
6045582 Prybyla Apr 2000 A
6045583 Gross et al. Apr 2000 A
6102953 Huebner Aug 2000 A
6129764 Servidio Oct 2000 A
6162254 Timoteo Dec 2000 A
6165224 Tornier Dec 2000 A
6168629 Timoteo Jan 2001 B1
6171341 Boileau et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183519 Bonnin et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197062 Fenlin Mar 2001 B1
6197063 Dews Mar 2001 B1
6203575 Farey Mar 2001 B1
6206925 Tornier Mar 2001 B1
6228120 Leonard et al. May 2001 B1
6267767 Strobel et al. Jul 2001 B1
6283999 Rockwood, Jr. Sep 2001 B1
6299646 Chambat et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312467 McGee Nov 2001 B1
6328758 Tornier et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334874 Tornier et al. Jan 2002 B1
6358250 Orbay Mar 2002 B1
6364910 Schultz et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368352 Camino et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368353 Arcand Apr 2002 B1
6379387 Tornier Apr 2002 B1
6398812 Masini Jun 2002 B1
6406495 Schoch Jun 2002 B1
6406496 Rüter Jun 2002 B1
6436144 Ahrens Aug 2002 B1
6436147 Zweymuller Aug 2002 B1
6454809 Tornier Sep 2002 B1
6458136 Allard et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475243 Sheldon et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488712 Tornier et al. Dec 2002 B1
6494913 Huebner Dec 2002 B1
6506214 Gross Jan 2003 B1
6508840 Rockwood, Jr. et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514287 Ondrla et al. Feb 2003 B2
6520994 Nogarin Feb 2003 B2
6530957 Jack Mar 2003 B1
6540770 Tornier et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558425 Rockwood, Jr. May 2003 B2
6569202 Whiteside May 2003 B2
6582469 Tornier Jun 2003 B1
6589281 Hyde, Jr. Jul 2003 B2
6599295 Tornier et al. Jul 2003 B1
6620197 Maroney et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626946 Walch et al. Sep 2003 B1
6673114 Hartdegen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6673115 Resch et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679916 Frankle et al. Jan 2004 B1
6699289 Iannotti et al. Mar 2004 B2
6736851 Maroney et al. May 2004 B2
6746487 Scifert et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749637 Bahler Jun 2004 B1
6755866 Southworth Jun 2004 B2
6676368 Tornier Jul 2004 B2
6761740 Tornier Jul 2004 B2
6767368 Tornier Jul 2004 B2
6780190 Maroney Aug 2004 B2
6783549 Stone Aug 2004 B1
6790234 Frankle Sep 2004 B1
6802864 Tornier Oct 2004 B2
6824567 Tornier et al. Nov 2004 B2
6863690 Ball et al. Mar 2005 B2
6875234 Lipman et al. Apr 2005 B2
6887277 Rauscher et al. May 2005 B2
6890357 Tornier May 2005 B2
6890358 Ball et al. May 2005 B2
6942699 Stone et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953478 Bouttens et al. Oct 2005 B2
6969406 Tornier Nov 2005 B2
7011686 Ball et al. Mar 2006 B2
7033396 Tornier Apr 2006 B2
7066959 Errico et al. Jun 2006 B2
7108719 Horber Sep 2006 B2
7166132 Callaway et al. Jan 2007 B2
7169184 Dalla Pria Jan 2007 B2
7175663 Stone Feb 2007 B1
7195645 Disilvestro et al. Mar 2007 B2
7238207 Blatter et al. Jul 2007 B2
7238208 Camino et al. Jul 2007 B2
7297163 Huebner Nov 2007 B2
7309360 Tornier et al. Dec 2007 B2
7329284 Maroney et al. Feb 2008 B2
7338498 Long et al. Mar 2008 B2
7338528 Stone et al. Mar 2008 B2
7468077 Rochetin et al. Dec 2008 B2
7544211 Rochetin et al. Jun 2009 B2
7604665 Iannotti et al. Oct 2009 B2
7666522 Justin et al. Feb 2010 B2
7678150 Tornier Mar 2010 B2
7753959 Berelsman et al. Jul 2010 B2
7892287 Deffenbaugh Feb 2011 B2
8002839 Rochetin et al. Aug 2011 B2
8114091 Ratron et al. Feb 2012 B2
8231683 Lappin et al. Jul 2012 B2
8241365 Williams, Jr. et al. Aug 2012 B2
8303665 Tornier et al. Nov 2012 B2
8308807 Seebeck et al. Nov 2012 B2
8465548 Long Jun 2013 B2
8480750 Long Jul 2013 B2
8532806 Masson Sep 2013 B1
8632597 Lappin Jan 2014 B2
8790402 Monaghan et al. Jul 2014 B2
8852283 Tornier et al. Oct 2014 B2
8864834 Boileau et al. Oct 2014 B2
8961611 Long Feb 2015 B2
9114017 Lappin Aug 2015 B2
9351844 Walch et al. May 2016 B2
9545312 Tornier et al. Jan 2017 B2
20010032021 McKinnon Oct 2001 A1
20010047210 Wolf Nov 2001 A1
20010049561 Dews et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020032484 Hyde, Jr. Mar 2002 A1
20020099381 Maroney Jul 2002 A1
20020138148 Hyde, Jr. Sep 2002 A1
20020143402 Steinberg Oct 2002 A1
20020151982 Masini Oct 2002 A1
20030009170 Tornier Jan 2003 A1
20030009171 Tornier Jan 2003 A1
20030028198 Tornier et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030074072 Errico et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030097183 Rauscher et al. May 2003 A1
20030114933 Bouttens et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030125809 Iannotti Jul 2003 A1
20030149485 Tornier Aug 2003 A1
20030158605 Tornier Aug 2003 A1
20040002765 Maroney et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040006392 Grusin et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040030394 Horber Feb 2004 A1
20040034431 Maroney et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039449 Tornier Feb 2004 A1
20040064189 Maroney et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040064190 Ball et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040133276 Lang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040134821 Tornier Jul 2004 A1
20040138754 Lang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148033 Schroeder Jul 2004 A1
20040193276 Maroney et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193277 Long et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193278 Maroney et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040210217 Baynham et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210317 Maroney et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215200 Tornier et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220673 Pria Nov 2004 A1
20040220674 Pria Nov 2004 A1
20040225367 Glien et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230197 Tornier et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040210220 Tornier Dec 2004 A1
20040267370 Ondria Dec 2004 A1
20050008672 Winterbottom et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015154 Lindsey et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050043805 Chudik Feb 2005 A1
20050049709 Tornier Mar 2005 A1
20050055102 Tornier et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065612 Winslow Mar 2005 A1
20050085919 Durand-Allen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050085921 Gupta et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050090902 Masini Apr 2005 A1
20050107882 Stone et al. May 2005 A1
20050113931 Horber May 2005 A1
20050119531 Sharratt Jun 2005 A1
20050143829 Ondria et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165490 Tornier Jul 2005 A1
20050177241 Angibaud et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050197708 Stone et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203536 Laffargue et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209700 Rockwood et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216092 Marik et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050251263 Forrer et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256584 Farrar Nov 2005 A1
20050267590 Lee Dec 2005 A1
20050278031 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278032 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278033 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288681 Klotz et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288791 Tornier et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004462 Gupta Jan 2006 A1
20060009852 Winslow et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015185 Chambat Jan 2006 A1
20060020344 Schultz et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030946 Ball et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060074353 Deffenbaugh et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060122705 Morgan Jun 2006 A1
20060149388 Smith et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173457 Tornier Aug 2006 A1
20060235538 Rochetin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241775 Buss Oct 2006 A1
20070016304 Chudik Jan 2007 A1
20070142918 Stone Jun 2007 A1
20070225817 Reubelt et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225818 Reubelt et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225821 Reubelt et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244564 Ferrand et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250174 Tornier et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080195108 Bhatnagar et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090149961 Dallmann Jun 2009 A1
20100016975 Iannotti et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100161066 Iannotti et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100217399 Groh Aug 2010 A1
20110190899 Pierce et al. Aug 2011 A1
20130110470 Vanasse et al. May 2013 A1
20130253656 Long Sep 2013 A1
20130261752 Lappin et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140142711 Maroney et al. May 2014 A1
20140257499 Winslow et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140371863 Vanasse et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150018959 Tornier et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150150688 Vanasse et al. Jun 2015 A1
20170095336 Tornier et al. Apr 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (73)
Number Date Country
426096 Dec 1966 CH
507704 May 1971 CH
101340862 Jan 2009 CN
19509037 Sep 1996 DE
19630298 Jan 1998 DE
0299889 Jan 1989 EP
0257359 Nov 1991 EP
0524857 Jan 1993 EP
0617934 Oct 1994 EP
0549480 Aug 1997 EP
0599429 Oct 1997 EP
0797964 Oct 1997 EP
0679375 Sep 1998 EP
0864306 Sep 1998 EP
0712617 Sep 1999 EP
0715836 Oct 2001 EP
0664108 Aug 2002 EP
0809986 Oct 2002 EP
0927548 May 2003 EP
0807426 Oct 2003 EP
1380274 Jan 2004 EP
1402854 Mar 2004 EP
0903128 May 2004 EP
1195149 Jul 2005 EP
1064890 Sep 2005 EP
1607067 Dec 2005 EP
1062923 Jul 2006 EP
1782765 May 2007 EP
0903127 Jun 2007 EP
1844737 Oct 2007 EP
1844737 Oct 2007 EP
1515758 Mar 2009 EP
1639966 Sep 2009 EP
1902689 Nov 2011 EP
1996125 May 2013 EP
2335655 Jul 2013 EP
1973498 Apr 2014 EP
1 844 737 Jun 2015 EP
2248820 May 1975 FR
2545352 Nov 1984 FR
2574283 Jun 1986 FR
2652498 Apr 1991 FR
2664809 Jan 1992 FR
2699400 Jun 1994 FR
2721200 Dec 1995 FR
2726994 May 1996 FR
2737107 Jan 1997 FR
2835425 Aug 2003 FR
2836039 Aug 2003 FR
2848099 Jun 2004 FR
2848099 Jun 2004 FR
2009-513285 Apr 2009 JP
749392 Jul 1980 SU
WO 9107932 Jun 1991 WO
WO 9309733 May 1993 WO
WO 9617553 Jun 1996 WO
WO 1997025943 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9846172 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9949792 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9965413 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0015154 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0041653 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0147442 Jul 2001 WO
WO 02039931 May 2002 WO
WO 02039933 May 2002 WO
WO 02067821 Sep 2002 WO
WO 03005933 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03094806 Nov 2003 WO
WO 03101320 Dec 2003 WO
WO 07109291 Sep 2007 WO
WO 07109319 Sep 2007 WO
WO 07109340 Sep 2007 WO
WO 2015068035 May 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (38)
Entry
Search Report and Written Opinion issued in ep 11185537.5 dated Feb. 14, 2012, in 5 pages.
Search Report and Written Opinion issued in FR 1058647 dated Jun. 14, 2011, in 6 pages.
“Anatomic Glenoid, Surgical Technique,” Smith & Nephew, Inc., Feb. 2000 in 6 pages.
“Anatomical Shoulder™—Cemented Shoulder Prosthesis Product Information and Surgical Technique,” Sulzer Medica, 2000, in 30 pages.
“Anatomical Shoulder™ System—The new removable head option,” Zimmer Inc., 2004 in 6 pages.
“Anatomical Shoulder™ System Surgical Technique—Removable head option for improved surgical results,” Zimmer, Inc., 2004, in 33 pages.
Apoil, A., “A Condyle for the Rotator Cuff Muscles: The Total Shoulder Prosthesis,” Aesculap—ICP S.A., Feb. 1994, in 4 pages.
Bigliani/Flatow®—The Complete Shoulder Solution, Designed by Shoulder Surgeons for Shoulder Surgery, Zimmer, Inc., 2001 in 6 pages.
“Bigliani/Flatow®—The Complete Shoulder Solution, Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Surgical Technique,” Zimmer, Inc., 2003, in 30 pages.
Bigliani/Flatow®—The Complete Shoulder Solution, 4-Part Fracture of the Humerus Surgical Technique, Zimmer, Inc., 2001.
“Bio-Modular® / Bi-Polar Shoulder Arthroplasty,” Biomet, Inc., 1997, in 2 pages.
“Bio-Modular® Choice—Shoulder System—Surgical Technique,” Biomet Orthopedics, Inc., 2004, in 16 pages.
Boileau, P., et al. “Adaptability and modularity of shoulder prosthese,”Maitrise Orthopédique, https://www.maitriseorthop.com/corpusmaitri/orthopaedic/prothese_epaule_orthop/boileau_us.shtml, downloaded Jan. 3, 2006.
Boileau, P., et al. “Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus: Does the Tendon Really Heal?” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc., Jun. 2005, 87A(6): 1229-1240.
Buechel, F.F., “Buechel-Pappas™ Modular Salvage Shoulder System, Surgical Procedure,” Endotec, Inc., Aug. 2001, in 8 pages.
Buechel, F.F., “Buechel-Pappas™ Resurfacing Shoulder System, Surgical Procedure” Endotec, Inc., Aug. 2000, in 8 pages.
Buechel, F.F., “Buechel-Pappas™ Total Shoulder System, Surgical Procedure,” Endotec, Inc., Aug. 2000, in 16 pages.
Cofield, R.H., “Cofield2 Total Shoulder System, Surgical Technique,” Smith & Nephew, 1997, in 32 pages.
“Copeland™ Humeral Resurfacing Head,” Biomet Orthopedics, Inc., 2001, in 12 pages.
“Delta CTA™ Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis—Surgical Technique,” DePuy International Ltd., revised Aug. 2004, in 28 pages.
Fenlin, Jr., J.M., “Total Glenohumeral Joint Replacement,” Symposium on Surgery of the Shoulder, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, Apr. 1975, 6(2): 565-583.
“Global C.A.P.™ Surgical Technique, Resurfacing Humeral Head Implant,” DePuy International, Ltd., revised Oct. 2004, in 23 pages.
Hertel, R., “Technical considerations for implantation of EPOCA glenoid components (Leseprobe),” Epoca Newsletter, May 14, 2001, in 1 page.
Mansat, M., “Neer 3™, Surgical Technique for Fractures,” Smith & Nephew, Sep. 2000, in 19 pages.
Nicholson, G.P., “Chapter 7: Arthroplasty and Rotator Cuff Deficiency,” Shoulder Arthroplasty, 2005, pp. 149-166.
“Offset Head: Bio-Modular® Total Shoulder,” Biomet, Inc. 2000 in 2 pages.
“Tornier Surgical Technique Addendum, Aequalis® Reversed Shoulder Polyethylene Insert,” Tornier, Inc., Oct. 8, 2005, in 1 page.
“Zimmer® Shoulder Retractors,” Zimmer, Inc., 2000, in 2 pages.
“Aequalis-Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis—Surgical Technique,” Tornier, Inc., 2002, in 32 pages.
“Aequalis-Reversed™ Shoulder Prosthesis, Surgical Technique,” Tornier, Inc., 2004, in 24 pages.
Boileau, P., “Technique de synthèse des tubérosités,” Tornier, Inc., 2005, in 2 pages.
Boileau, P., “The technique of Tuberosities Fixation,” Tornier, Inc., 2007, in 2 pages.
“Latitude Total Elbow Prosthesis Surgical Technique,” Tornier Implants, 2004, in 40 pages.
“Latitude Total Elbow Prosthesis Surgical Technique,” Tornier Implants, 2007, in 44 pages.
“FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness: Glenoid Component for the Foundation™ Total Shoulder System,” Encore Orthopedics, Inc., Apr. 15, 1996, in 1 page.
“Aequalis-Glenoid Keeled and Pegged—Surgical Technique Brochure,” Tornier, Inc., 2003 in 12 pages.
Klein, T.J., et al., “Mechanically Favorable Bone Remodeling in Rotator Cuff Arthropathy Patients with Good Function,” presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics University of Pittsburgh, Oct. 21-23, 1999, in 2 pages.
“The Foundation® Total Shoulder System,” Encore Orthopedics, Inc., Apr. 1996, in 3 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160242921 A1 Aug 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61488102 May 2011 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13279070 Oct 2011 US
Child 15145210 US