The field of the invention is a setting mechanism for subterranean tools and more particularly a mechanism to produce a flow induced pressure wave that is sufficient to set the tool.
Tools located in very deep wells frequently need pressure levels for setting that can be beyond the capabilities of surface pumping equipment. One way to set such tools is to develop a boost force in the form of a pressure surge to get the internal pressure in the tool to a level where the tool can be set.
One attempt at doing this is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 7,870,895 where initial movement of the packer setting mechanism triggers either a chemical reaction that generates gas pressure or a setting off of explosive to get a pressure surge to set the packer. These two sources can be an assist or the sole driving force for setting the packer with a pressure sensitive piston. Generating the pressure surge with chemicals or explosives creates increased cost as well as safety issues and transportation issues to the well site.
What is needed is a simpler and cheaper way to generate a pressure surge to set a subterranean tool and the present invention addresses this issue. The kinetic energy of flowing well fluids are deployed and a hammer effect is created by abrupt interruption of circulating fluid while still leaving a flow channel open to reach an actuating piston for the tool. The fluid hammer effect that is created provides sufficient pressure to set the tool. The hammer effect is created with either a rapid increase in flow to close a circulation port or a dropped object on a seat that isolates a circulation port while leaving access open to an actuation piston for the tool. In the preferred embodiment the tool is a pressure set packer but other types of tools are contemplated. Those skilled in the art will more readily appreciate the details of the invention from the attached description and the associated drawings while recognizing that the full scope of the invention is to be found from the appended claims.
A circulation sub is provided that has a ball seat and a circulation port that is closed when a ball is landed on the seat. An axial passage directs the pressure surge created with the landing of the ball on the seat to the port with the actuation piston for the tool. The surge in pressure operates the actuation piston to set the tool, which is preferably a packer. In an alternative embodiment raising the circulation rate through a constriction in a circulation sub breaks a shear device and allows the restriction to shift to cover a circulation port. The pressure surge that ensues continues through the restriction to the actuating piston for the tool to set the tool.
a and 1b illustrate the embodiment where the seating of a ball on a seat creates the pressure wave to the tool actuation piston respectively in the run in and the set positions; and
a and 2b use an increase in flow to create the pressure wave to the tool actuation piston and respectively show the run in and the set positions:
a-3b are an alternative embodiment to
a-4b are an alternative embodiment illustrating a spring loaded ball that seats with pressure to isolate a lateral port;
a-6b are another alternative embodiment where the circulation ports are closed with a spring-loaded ported sleeve.
Connected to the top of the packer mandrel 42 is a circulation sub 26. A ball seat 28 is located above lateral port 30 such that without ball 32 landed in seat 28 circulation, down a dedicated path to port 30, represented by arrow 34 up the annular space 36 and to the surface is possible. Axial passage 38 remains open even when ball 32 lands in seat 28. Passage 38 leads into passage 40 in mandrel 42 and down to port 14. As shown in
a and 2b also have a lateral port 30 but instead of a ball seat as in
a-3b show that initially the collet 71 is latched in groove 72 when the ports 30 are open and when flow is increases to increase the net force on sleeve 50, the sleeve is shifted to block ports 30 while allowing through flow to a tool such as a packer 12 for setting using the shock wave that is created. In the blocked position of ports 30 the collet 71 is latched into groove 74 as shown in
a-4b are a variation of the
a-6b are an alternative embodiment to
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the use of the kinetic energy of the circulating fluid is employed in the different configurations described in the drawings to create a hammer effect with the resulting pressure spike being conducted to the setting port of the tool for use in setting the tool. A rupture disc can be placed in the tool port that breaks under the force of the hammer effect. The spike is over and above the static pressure delivered by the surface pumping equipment. In each case there is a single moving part, either the ball 32 or the sleeve 50. The design is simple and cheap to build and needs no seals that can be attacked by grit in the well fluids. Although a single passage 38 is shown, multiple passages can be used. The tools actuated can be anchors, fishing tools, vibratory tools, jars, spears and grapples to name a few examples.
The creation of the hammer effect can also be combined with a piston or pistons in passage 40 that multiply the hammer effect by having a larger dimension to receive the hammer effect and a smaller dimension on an opposite side so that the hammer effect can be multiplied by the ratio of the diameters of the piston on opposed sides. To do this passage 40 would have two different dimensions to accommodate the two piston diameters of this booster piston that responds to the created hammer effect. Piston 70 is shown schematically in
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3909776 | Broding et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4054399 | Maurer | Oct 1977 | A |
4120097 | Jeter | Oct 1978 | A |
4905778 | Jurgens | Mar 1990 | A |
5079750 | Scherbatskoy | Jan 1992 | A |
7870895 | Lucas | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8522877 | Chambers et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20050011678 | Akinlade et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20120279603 | Swist | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120327742 | Kusko et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140048283 | Mohon et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130133878 A1 | May 2013 | US |