Hunting and target archery arrows can frequently get deeply embedded in wood or other similar objects. Removing them intact and undamaged can be difficult if not impossible. The shafts of the arrows alone constitute an expensive investment on the part of the hunter, especially when the shafts are constructed of carbon fiber. A typical carbon fiber arrow shaft can cost between $10 and $20.
In general, the present disclosure relates to shaft extraction devices that allow an elongated object having a shaft to be removed when an end of the object has become stuck or embedded in another object. In some implementations, the devices are configured to allow an archery arrow to be safely extracted from an object in which it has become embedded without significant (and generally without any) damage to the arrow.
The shaft extraction devices described herein include an elongated gripping element that is removably clamped onto a shaft by a clamping device. The gripping element and clamping device are configured to allow the shaft, e.g., the shaft of an arrow, to be securely gripped without crushing. A force applying element, mounted on the clamping device, allows a force to be applied to the shaft in a direction parallel to the long axis of the shaft.
In some implementations, the clamping device connects the gripping portion to a slide weight assembly that includes a slide rod and a slide hammer and which is configured to allow a force to be applied to the gripping portion and, thus, to the shaft, in a direction substantially parallel to the axis of the shaft when the slide hammer is actuated.
The devices disclosed herein allow a force to be applied to a shaft so as to allow an object that includes the shaft, e.g., an arrow, to be retrieved without significant damage to the shaft or the need for application of excessive amounts of force by the user. For example, when an arrow is embedded in an object, e.g., a wood stump or tree, the device can be clamped onto the arrow shaft with a clamping force that is sufficient to limit slippage when the slide hammer is actuated and yet not so excessive that damage to the arrow shaft is incurred. The slide weight is tapped against a slide stop by the user, which, with each subsequent tap, incrementally backs the arrow out of the object.
In one aspect, the invention features a shaft extraction device that includes (a) a gripping element configured to grip a portion of a shaft having a longitudinal axis, and distribute a force applied to the gripping element over the portion; (b) a clamping device, mounted on the gripping element, configured to releasably secure the gripping element to the shaft; and (c) a force applying element, mounted on the clamping device, the force applying element being configured to allow an extraction force to be applied to the gripping element in a direction parallel to the axis of the shaft.
Some implementations can include one or more of the following features. For example, the force applying element can include a slide rod, and the device can further include a slide hammer slidably mounted on the slide rod. The gripping element can include a pair of hemi-cylindrical elements, which can range in length, for example, from 2 to 6 inches, and can be configured to be positioned on opposite sides of the shaft. Furthermore, the hemi-cylindrical elements can be lined with an elastomeric material that can have, for example, a Shore A durometer of about 30 to 85.
Some implementations of the clamping device can comprise locking pliers. The clamping device can be secured to the gripping device. The clamping device can be configured to allow the force applied to the shaft through the gripping elements by the clamping device to be adjustable.
Some implementations of the slide rod can have a length from about 2 to 3 feet. The slide rod may have a slide stop which limits the travel of the slide hammer along the slide rod.
In some implementations, the longitudinal axis of the force applying element is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the clamping device. In addition, some implementations of the clamping device will have a longitudinal axis, which is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the gripping device. In other implementations, the longitudinal axis of the clamping device is perpendicular to that of the gripping device.
In another aspect, the invention features shaft extraction methods, which comprise (a) gripping a portion of a shaft having a longitudinal axis with a gripping element; (b) releasably securing the gripping element to the shaft with a clamping element; and (c) applying a force to the gripping element, using a force applying element that is mounted on the clamping device and that has a longitudinal axis that is substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the clamping device.
As discussed above, the shaft extraction devices described herein include a gripping element that releasably grips the shaft to be extracted, a clamping device that secures the gripping element in place on the shaft, and a force applying element that allows a force to be applied to the gripping element, and thus to the shaft, in a direction generally parallel to the long axis of the shaft.
Referring to
The slide hammer 12 generally ranges in weight from about 1 to 5 pounds and can have a length ranging from about 4 to 8 inches. Generally, the length and weight of the slide hammer are determined by the force that needs to be applied to extract the shaft (e.g., the force required to back an arrow head and shaft out of an object in which it is embedded), and the portability requirements of the particular application. The slide hammer 12 is shaped with flared flanges 13 at both ends, which serve to protect the user's fingers from being pinched during operation. The slide hammer 12 moves along the slide rod 16, which generally ranges in length from 2 to 3 feet when the device is intended for arrow removal. The slide rod 16 is generally long enough to give the slide hammer sufficient travel distance without negatively impacting the portability of the device. The slide rod 16 is generally formed of a metal, e.g., steel or aluminum, and may be solid or hollow. Generally, the slide hammer 12 operates on the slide rod 16 behind the nock of the arrow.
Referring to
In some implementations, the slide rod 16 is attached to the clamping device 24 such that its long axis is substantially perpendicular to that of the clamping device 24, preferably at a 90° angle plus or minus 1°. The slide rod may be attached, e.g., by threading a threaded end of the slide rod 16 into a threaded through opening in the clamping device 16 and securing with a nut 17. The substantially perpendicular mounting of the clamping device on the slide rod ensures that the force generated by actuating the slide hammer 16 against the slide stop 18 (the extraction force) is transmitted to the arrow shaft along its axis.
Referring to
Referring to
In the embodiment shown in
Referring to
To use the device, a user unlocks the clamping device 24 (if it is locked), and positions the hemi-cylindrical elements 20 on either side of the shaft to be extracted. The user then locks the clamping device 24, first adjusting the clamping force if necessary by adjusting the screw 23, and applies a force to the shaft by sliding the slide hammer back and forth against the slide stop. It is generally preferred that the user operate the slide hammer with moderate force, e.g., a force that will incrementally move the arrow head about 1/16″ per hammer blow, so as to avoid applying a potentially damaging force to the arrow.
A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
For example, other embodiments could be used to extract a variety of types and sizes of shafts, for example a shaft having one end stuck in a machine. Adjustments to the scale of the shaft extraction device would be dictated by the shaft needing to be extracted. Additionally, some embodiments could utilize clamping devices without the use of a rubber or an elastomer.
Other embodiments could omit the slide weight and in its place utilize a plate attached generally perpendicular to the clamping device which could be struck with a hammer or something similar.
Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2572370 | Moeller | Oct 1951 | A |
3826471 | Orton | Jul 1974 | A |
3890692 | Jandura | Jun 1975 | A |
5102100 | Troncoso, Jr. | Apr 1992 | A |
5445424 | Binette | Aug 1995 | A |
5544926 | Ravencroft | Aug 1996 | A |
5546621 | Bulot | Aug 1996 | A |
5765821 | Janisse et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5984272 | Crider | Nov 1999 | A |
5991997 | Schley et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6854776 | Downing | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6994385 | Sigears | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7234219 | Deiter | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7682270 | De Buyer-Mimeure | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20040051315 | Barker | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2567259 | Jan 1986 | FR |
Entry |
---|
Flinch Outdoor Gear On-Line Catalogue, pp. 1-2 Flinch Outdoor Gear Broadhead Extractor: http://www.flinchoutdoorgear.com/broadheadextractors.html. |
Darryl L. Woods Review on Flinch Broadhead Extractor, pp. 1-3 Outdoor Product Review.com: Flinch Broadhead Extractor http://outdoorproductreview.com/index.php?option=com—content&view=article&id=47:flinch-broadhead-extractor&catid=25:archery&Itemid=43. |
Products found at an online vendor: Lancaster Archery Supply, pp. 1-2 http://www.lancasterarchery.com/shooting-gear/3d-target-accessories/arrow-pullers.html Fivics Arrow puller, Third Hand Pro Puller, October Mountain Products Flex Pull Arrow Puller, AAE Gorilla Grip Arrow Puller, Coffey Wedge-it Arrow Puller, Cartel Rubber Arrow Puller, Booster Arrow Puller. |
Double D's Archery Products: http:l/www.ddarchery.com/ Double D's Arrow Puller. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130154295 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |