Many surgical instruments include a working end or effector, such as a clamp, scissors, forceps, needle holder, graspers, pusher, etc. that is connected to a central shaft. Distal from the working end is typically a handle for grasping and manipulating the instrument. In many instances, the handle includes an actuating mechanism that is linked to and that actuates the working end or effector. For example, scissors may include blade portions that are moveable relative to each other. The scissors are connected to a shaft extending away from the scissors. At the distal end, the handle includes a linkage that can be manipulated by a user to actuate the scissors.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,501,698 discloses a device for performing minimally-invasive microsurgery such as thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. The instrument generally includes a pair of coaxially arranged shafts, an end-effector at the distal ends of the shafts, and an actuator at the proximal ends of the shafts. The actuator includes a pair of generally straight arms pivotally coupled to a shaft. The links are coupled to a proximal portion of the arms for mechanical advantage. The instruments may be provided in a variety of sizes, depending on the particular purpose for which the instrument is to be used.
The present invention provides an instrument for use in intricate, minimally-invasive procedures. The instrument has an ergonomic handle with one or more of various features providing advantages over existing prior art handles. For example, in one embodiment, the handle of the present invention may be formed at least partially of titanium or another metal that is resistive to corrosion during cleaning of the handle. Titanium may provide an added benefit of decreasing the overall weight of the handle.
In some embodiments, material at the center portion of the handle may be removed to provide an open handle configuration. The handle portions may thus have a reduced side profile. This embodiment reduces the surface area of the handle that may harbor bacteria, dirt, etc. It may also reduce areas that would be difficult to clean.
The handle may include a gripping section for frictionally engaging the user's hand. In an additional or alternative embodiment, the handle includes a contoured section that increases the ergonomic aspects of the handle. The handle may also create a decreased number of connections to the surgical instrument, thereby decreasing the instrument's complexity and possible failure points. In addition, the connection design of the handle to the surgical instrument may also for increased control of the working end of the surgical instrument via the handle.
The handle typically includes two or more handle portions in an opposed relationship that are connected to the surgical instrument. The handle portions may extend from an end of the shaft in a direction toward the working end of the instrument, whereby the handle portions overly a portion of the shaft, such that the handle either does not or only minimally extends past the end of the surgical instrument. In this embodiment, the handle is in a compact configuration reducing the overall length of the instrument.
In some embodiments, the handle portions may provide clearance relative to the shaft so as increase the motion of the handle portions relative to each other, thereby providing more precise control of the surgical instrument. The handle may also allow the surgical instrument to be more easily rotated in the hands of the user without the need to remove the surgical instrument from the surgical site to be repositioned in the user's hand.
Considering specific exemplary combinations of inventive features, one embodiment relates to a surgical instrument having a shaft and a handle. A rod is located in the shaft and extends between a first end that is connected to a working end of the surgical instrument, and a second end that connects to the handle. The first and second handle portions are in pivotal communication with the shaft. First and second linkages respectively connect the first and second handle portions to the rod at or near the distal end of the rod. When the first and second handles are moved about respective pivot points relative to the shaft, the rod operates the working end of the surgical instrument. To accommodate a finger and another finger or thumb of the surgeon in an advantageous manner, the handle portions may each have an indented grasping segment, typically at the distal end region of the handle.
Additional features may be included. For instance, the indented handle areas may have a rounded cross-section to facilitate a surgeon rotating the handle. The cross-section may be, for example, semi-elliptical. The indented portions may also include gripping surfaces with ridges to assist in firmly grasping the handle. The indented portions may also each include a finger stop at a distal end thereof to permit the surgeon to easily grasp the handle in a preferred location.
Typically, the handle will have an open configuration and a closed configuration. The indented portions together form a narrow handle portion when the handle is in the closed configuration. In one embodiment, the handle at a widest portion is at least two times wider than the handle at a narrow portion (e.g. in the indented region) when the handle is in a closed configuration. Another feature is that the handle at a widest portion may be at least four times wider than the shaft, in the closed configuration, to provide rotational stability.
The handle may include walls having elongated openings to facilitate cleaning of the handle. The handle may also be configured to have a 1:1 movement ratio between movement of the handle by the surgeon, as when the surgeon is pressing down on the handle to move the working end into a closed position, and the corresponding movement of the working end. In a preferred embodiment, the indentation depth ratio of the handle is between 0.35 and 0.55; and the indentation length ratio of the handle is between 0.65 and 0.85
In any of the specific embodiments, the handle of the surgical instrument may be compact relative to the overall length of the device, with the handle being no more than approximately one third as long as the total length of the surgical instrument. The balance point of the instrument may be at approximately the distal end of the handle. In some embodiments, the balance point is at approximately ⅓ of the length of the instrument from the proximal end of the instrument.
The handle of any of the embodiments may have a two-portion structure, with a relatively heavy proximal portion and a lighter distal portion that curves inwardly sharply and that has a rounded cross-section. The relatively heavy proximal portion acts as a counterweight, so that there is a balance point at about the point where the surgeon is grasping the device. The counterweight makes the device more stable. The proximal portion of the handle may also be relatively wider than the distal portion when the handle is in a closed configuration, as described above, to add rotational stability.
The aforementioned features may be combined in a variety of different ways to form different embodiments. It should also be understood that the foregoing Summary is not a complete description of the inventive features and aspects of the invention. Other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following Detailed Description, taken in conjunction with the drawings, and from the claims.
The following table summarizes the reference numbers used in conjunction with the accompanying Figures:
The following description of embodiments refers to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate specific embodiments of the invention. Other embodiments having different structures and operation do not depart from the scope of the present invention. For example, the handle of the present invention is illustrated herein in communication with different surgical instrument embodiments. It is understood that the handle of the present invention is not confined to the specific embodiments shown herein. These embodiments merely illustrate the concepts of the invention as applied to specific surgical instruments.
As illustrated in
As illustrated, the handle 10 of this embodiment includes first and second lengthwise extending handle portions, respectively 36 and 38. The handle portions 36, 38 are in an opposed relationship and are pivotally connected to the instrument housing 22 at a distal position B. In the illustrated embodiment, the handle portions are connected to the housing via pivot pins 40. In other embodiments, the handle portions may be connected via living hinges to the housing 22. The first and second handle portions are also mechanically connected to the rod 24 of the surgical instrument. In the illustrated embodiment, the handle 10 includes first and second linkages, respectively 42 and 44. The first linkage 42 is pivotably connected to both the first handle portion 36 and the rod 24, and the second linkage 44 is pivotably connected to both the second handle portion 38 and the rod 24.
In this embodiment, the first and second linkages are respectively connected to the first and second handle portions at a position C and to the rod at a position D. In this embodiment, the position D is more distal from the connection of the rod to the working end 16 than the position C where the linkages 42 and 44 are respectively connected to the handle portions 36 and 38. In this configuration, when the two handle portions 36 and 38 are moved toward one another, such as when squeezed together by a user's hand (See
As understood,
Referring again to
In some embodiments, the first and second handle portions 36 and 38 may have respective outer contoured surfaces 48 and 50 to provide an ergonomic design for fitting in a user's hand. As illustrated, the contoured surfaces 48 and 50 may include narrow portions 52 and 54 for placement of a user's finger or thumb. In some embodiments, the contoured surfaces 48 and 50 may include gripping surfaces 56 and 58. The gripping surfaces may be any desired size and at any desired location for improving desired gripping of the handle.
With reference to
With reference to
Two relevant ratios pertaining to the dimensions are as follows. The total of the dimensions D5+D6+D8 is 1.8 cm. The inward dimension of the indented grasping area is D5+D8=0.8 cm. Consequently, the ratio of the depth of the indentation to the depth of the full handle at that point is (D5+D8)/(D5+D6+D8)=0.8 cm/1.8 cm=0.44. This may be referred to, in the context of this design, as the “indentation depth ratio.” Another relevant ratio relates to the total length of a handle portion D1 relative to the distance to the proximal end of the gripping area, D2. In this embodiment, D2/D1−8.5/11.3=0.75, which is referred to as the “indentation length ratio.” Generally, in this particularly well-performing embodiment, an indentation depth ratio of between 0.35 and 0.55 is desirable, and an indentation length ratio of between 0.65 and 0.85 is desirable, in order to facilitate desirable control and ergonomic features of the device.
As mentioned above, a biasing mechanism 30 is located in communication with the rod 24 to bias the rod. In some embodiments, the biasing mechanism may be configured to provide added control between the handle 10 and the working end 16. The biasing mechanism can be designed to allow for variability of the force necessary to activate the working end 16, in this case, the cutting edges 20.
For example, where a spring is used as the biasing mechanism, a more compliant spring (i.e., less resistive) will reduce the activation force, while a less compliant spring will increase the activation force. The specification of the spring could be chosen during the manufacturing process or it could be selected by the user. In this latter instance, user selection could be made by allowing the user to replace the spring by selecting from a plurality of replacement springs having different tensioning. In another or additional embodiment, the biasing mechanism may include an adjustable bias aspect that allows the user to alter biasing when desired or needed. For example, the biasing mechanism of this embodiment may include a spring with screw tension adjustment to set and adjust the tension on the spring.
The biasing system may also offer the benefit of limiting the force that forceps, scissors and needle drivers close and open. This “terminal force” may be a benefit, for example, if the surgeon has a piece of tissue in the forceps and depresses the handle more. Even though the handles are pushed further down, the forceps will only exert a maximum force as specified by the spring chosen. Here again, the amount of bias may be selected and/or adjusted based on the embodiment.
The ergonomic and compact design of the handle allows the instrument to be more easily manipulated. For example, because the first and second handle portions 36 and 38 of some embodiments are located in compact adjacent relationship to the shaft, the handle may allow the surgical instrument to be more easily rotated in the hands of the user without the need to remove the surgical instrument from the surgical site to be repositioned in the user's hand. Further, the compact design may allow for use of the surgical instrument in close proximity to other surgical instruments without less obstruction. The ergonomic design of some embodiments may also allow for increased control of the surgical instrument. Due in part to the simply mechanical linkages used, the arched or angled inner surfaces 60 and 62 that allow for greater clearance of the first and second handle portions 36 and 38 relative to the shaft, and the ergonomic design, the handle may achieve at or near 1 to 1 ratio between action of the user's hands during activation and the action of the working end of the instrument, which allows the instrument to feel as though it is an extension of the user's hand.
When clamps or similar surgical instruments are employed, it may be beneficial to lock the clamps in place during use, as illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, the locks 66 and 68 are somewhat centrally located widthwise in the handle. To accommodate for this placement, the surgical instrument of the illustrated embodiment includes a slot 78 in the shaft to provide clearance for the locks. While not illustrated, in some embodiments, the first and second locks could be placed in an off-center position in the handle so as to avoid the shaft.
As illustrated, the first and second locks 66 and 68 may be coupled respectively to the first and second handle portions 36 and 38 so as to be laterally moveable relative to the first and second portions. Specifically, in one embodiment, the first and second locks 66 and 68 are located in slots 70 and 72 respectively in the first and second handle portions 36 and 38. The first and second locks are laterally biased by bias mechanism 74 and 76, such as springs. In this configuration, when the first and second handle portions 36 and 38 are move toward each other, the L-shaped portions 66a and 68b of the first and second locks 66 and 68 are brought into engagement with other to interlock. However, further movement of the first and second handle portions relative to each other will cause the biasing mechanism to move the first and second locks away from each other laterally. It is understood that
In one embodiment of the present invention, the handle provides rotational stability by having, for example, a portion that is considerably wider than the shaft. This width helps to create rotational inertia, which tends to resist rotation of the shaft. The device is therefore more stable at times when the surgeon does not want the device to rotate, and helps to slow the rotation as the surgeon is rotating the device. This gives the surgeon better control during the delicate stitching process. In
Additionally, the width of the handle in the closed configuration at a narrow portion at the base of an indented portion, D12, is about 1.1 cm in the embodiment of
Various aspects of the handle construction provide added functionality and ease of use. As a few non-limiting examples, the indented portion of the handle allows the surgeon to quickly locate the proper location on the handle to grasp. The round and/or semi-elliptical cross-section at the indented portion provides the surgeon with the ability to smoothly rotate the device during surgery. In some embodiments, the width of the handle at a wider portion creates rotational inertia that provides rotational stability. The relative dimensions of certain embodiments and/or the relative weight of the handle in relation to the shaft, balances the device for improved control. In one embodiment, the handle has two portions. The proximal portion is relatively heavy. The distal portion curves inward sharply, has a curved cross-section and is lighter than the proximal portion. A surgeon grasps the handle at the distal, inwardly curved portion with the thumb and a finger, and holds the device as in
Removal of non-essential and non-functional elements of the handle in some embodiments minimizes the mass and ultimate weight of the handle. Use of contoured handle elements and gripping elements in some embodiments provides a natural resting place for fingers and aids in handle manipulation. The open handle design of some embodiments allows for easy cleaning of the device that may otherwise be hidden and not easily verifiable as clean. Also, the compact nature of the handle and circular gripping area allow for easy manipulation and rotation of the surgical instrument with reduced requirements for repositioning of the instrument. First and second handle portions 36, 38 and other components such as interface connector 28 may be made of titanium, which has properties of strength and light weight. The shaft 14 is typically made of stainless steel, although alternative materials may be used for both the handle 10 and the shaft 14.
Minimizing connection points between the handle and the shaft minimizes jamming and/or malfunctioning of the surgical instrument. Also, the linkage used in some embodiments of the design allow for 1 to 1 ratio or near 1 to 1 ratio between action of the user's hands during activation and the action of the working end of the instrument, which allows the instrument to feel as though it is an extension of the user's hand. The use of titanium in some embodiments increases the stability and longevity of the handle, decreases weight, and eliminates most handle degradation due to use and cleaning.
In a preferred embodiment, the device has a balance point at the distal end of the handle, when the handle is in a closed configuration. Consequently, when the surgeon grasps the handle at the indentations, as illustrated in
Referring to the specific, non-limiting embodiment of
While particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the appended claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/078,184, filed on Jul. 3, 2008 and entitled “Ergonomic Handle for Shafted Instruments,” and is a continuation-in-part of US Design Patent Application No. 29/335,238, filed on Apr. 10, 2009, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61078184 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 29335238 | Apr 2009 | US |
Child | 12493977 | US |