The present invention relates to semiconductor processing, and more particularly to a method for performing trench isolation during semiconductor device fabrication.
Shallow trench isolation (STI) technology uses shallow, refilled trenches for isolating devices of the same type as replacements for LOCOS isolation. The process begins by depositing a layer of pad oxide on a silicon substrate and patterning a nitride mask to define active regions on the silicon substrate. Shallow trenches are then etched into the silicon substrate in the openings in the nitride mask between the active regions. A liner oxidation process is performed in the recesses in which a thin layer of oxide is grown. Next, an oxide (e.g., SiO2) is deposited over the silicon substrate and is then etched back so that it remains only in the trenches, its top surface level with the nitride mask. After the oxide is etched back, the nitride mask is stripped to expose the pad oxide and a dip back process is performed on the pad oxide. Thereafter, a layer of polysilicon (Poly1) may be patterned to define floating gate structures for the semiconductor device.
Although the STI process has the advantages of eliminating birds beak of the LOCOS process and of providing a planar surface, the STI process has several drawbacks.
Conventional approaches for rounding the trench corners 16 include 1) performing a single liner oxidation with a double sacrificial oxidation or 2) performing a double liner oxidation with a single sacrificial oxidation. Both the approaches, however, fail to sufficiently round the trench corners 16 to reduce electron leakage to an acceptable level.
Accordingly what is needed is a STI process that has improved trench corner rounding that significantly prevents electron leakage between the polysilicon and the active regions of the substrate. The present invention addresses such a need.
The present invention provides a method for performing shallow trench isolation during semiconductor fabrication that improves trench corner rounding. The method includes etching trenches into a silicon substrate between active regions, and performing a double liner oxidation process on the trenches. The method further includes performing a double sacrificial oxidation process on the active regions, wherein corners of the trenches are substantially rounded by the four oxidation processes.
According to the present invention, the trench corners are substantially rounded, which significantly reduces electron leakage between the polysilicon and the active regions of the substrate and increases performance of the semiconductor devices.
The present invention relates to a method for performing trench isolation during semiconductor device fabrication. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiments and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
The present invention provides a method for performing shallow trench isolation that improves STI corner rounding in a semiconductor device. After etching shallow trenches into a substrate, the process includes performing a double liner oxidation process on the trenches prior to STI fill. Thereafter, a double sacrificial oxidation process is performed, resulting in improved STI corner rounding.
The process begins by providing a silicon substrate 24 with a layer of pad oxide 26 (S1O2) and a masking material, such as a layer of silicon nitride 28, defining active regions 30 and isolation regions 32 on the substrate 24 in step 50 (
After the trenches 34 have been formed, the substrate 24 is precleaned in step 54, creating undercuts 36 in the pad oxide 26, as shown in
After the preclean, a first liner oxidation is performed in which a thin layer of oxide 38 is grown in the trenches 34 in step 56 (
After the first liner oxidation, a dip back is performed to remove the oxide 38 from the surface of the trenches 34 in step 58 (
After the second lincer oxidation, the trenches 34 are filled by depositing an isolation oxide 42 over the substrate 24 in step 64, such as TEOS (tetraethyl orthosilicate) or HDP (high-density plasma) (
After the first sacrificial oxidation, a dip back is performed to remove the oxide 44 in step 74. In a preferred embodiment, the dip back removes approximately 200 Å of material, which is slightly larger than the thickness of the oxide 44 grown during the first oxidation. Thus, the dip back removes not only the oxide 44, but also a portion of the fill material 42, which exposes the corner of the trench for a second sacrificial oxidation, as shown in
After the oxide 44 is removed, a second sacrificial oxidation is performed in which a second layer of oxide 46 is again grown on the active regions 30 of the silicon substrate 24 in step 76 (
Semiconductor fabrication then proceeds as normal in step 78, including removing the oxide 46, performing implants, and patterning at least one a layer of polysilicon 48 over the active regions 30 (
A method for performing STI has been disclosed in which two liner oxidations are performed in the trenches, followed by two sacrificial oxidations. The present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, and one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments, and any variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part claiming priority of U.S. patent application entitled “Shallow Trench Isolation Approach for Improved STI Corner Rounding”, Ser. No. 10/032,631, filed Dec. 27, 2001 now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5719085 | Moon et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5741740 | Jang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5861339 | Lien | Jan 1999 | A |
5970363 | Kepler et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5998280 | Bergemont et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6040232 | Gau | Mar 2000 | A |
6054343 | Ashburn | Apr 2000 | A |
6087243 | Wang | Jul 2000 | A |
6165854 | Wu | Dec 2000 | A |
6326283 | Liang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6541382 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6670689 | Oh et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6689665 | Jang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
20010012676 | Dickerson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010041421 | Park et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020117731 | Kim et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030176043 | Kim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1160852 | May 2001 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030176043 A1 | Sep 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10032631 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10277395 | US |