The field of the disclosure relates generally to spars for aircraft wings and rotor blades, and more particularly, to shape memory alloy active spars.
Shape memory alloys (SMA) are a group of metals that have interesting thermal and mechanical properties. Shape memory alloys can exist in one of several distinct temperature-dependent phases. The most commonly utilized of these phases are the so-called martensite and austenite phases. Upon heating a shape memory alloy through a transformation temperature, the shape memory alloy changes from the martensite phase into the austenite phase.
A shape memory alloy material, for example, NiTinol that is deformed while in a martensitic state (low yield strength condition) and then heated to its transition temperature to reach an austenitic state where the shape memory alloy material will resume its original (non-deformed) shape. The rate of return to the original shape depends upon the amount and rate of thermal energy applied to the component. When the shape memory alloy material is cooled, the shape memory alloy material will return to the martensitic state and shape.
Structural spars are used in aircraft wings, rotor blades, as well as non-aerospace structures for strength and to facilitate the shape of the structures. Mechanical and/or electrical actuation systems are sometimes used to change the shape of structures that include spars. However these mechanical and/or electrical actuation systems are complex, take up space and add weight. There is a need for a means of changing the shape of structural spars that does not have these known detrimental characteristics.
In one aspect, a system for changing a shape of a structural spar is provided. The system includes a plurality of adjoining structural strips axially aligned to form the structural spar. At least one of the structural strips is formed from a shape memory alloy. The system also includes a temperature control system to control a temperature of the at least one shape memory alloy strip. Heat applied to the at least one shape memory alloy strip causes the structural spar to twist or bend.
In another aspect, a structural spar is provided. The structural spar includes a plurality of adjoining structural strips to form the structural spar. At least one of the structural strips is a shape memory alloy strip. The structural spar also includes at least one heating element positioned adjacent the at least one shape memory alloy strip to change a temperature of the at least one shape memory alloy strip. Heat applied to the at least one shape memory alloy strip causes the structural spar to twist or bend.
In another aspect, a method of twisting a rotor blade is provided. The method includes forming a structural spar from a plurality of adjoining structural strips axially aligned to form the structural spar, with at least one of the strips comprising a shape memory alloy strip. The method also includes attaching a temperature control system to the structural spar to control a temperature of the at least one shape memory alloy strip, and applying heat to the at least one shape memory alloy strip to cause the structural spar to twist which twists the rotor blade.
The features, functions, and advantages that have been discussed can be achieved independently in various embodiments or may be combined in yet other embodiments further details of which can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.
Shape memory alloy active spars for aircraft wings and rotors are described in detail below. A system for changing the shape of an aircraft structural spar in an exemplary embodiment includes a plurality of adjoining structural strips axially aligned to form the structural spar. At least one of the strips is formed from a shape memory alloy. Shape memory materials are characterized by a shape transition both upon heating from the martensite phase of the material to the austenite phase. Upon cooling, the shape memory alloy moves from the austenite phase back to the martensite phase. The system also includes a temperature control system to control the temperature of the shape memory alloy strips. Heat applied to the shape memory alloy strips move to the austenite phase where the shape memory alloy strips changes to the trained/morphed configuration (twisted configuration) which causes the structural spar to twist. The twist of the structural spar will twist, for example, a helicopter rotor blade. The twist in the rotor blade provides aerodynamic optimization between hover and forward flight, and increases lift capacity. Aerodynamic optimization between hover and forward flight produces cost savings, for example, fuel savings that may be attributed to increased envelope performance. In addition, the blade twist may permit integration of higher harmonic control technologies in the blade. It should be understood that the description below references an exemplary helicopter rotor blade, but may also be utilized in an aircraft wing and other structures for both aerospace and non-aerospace applications.
Referring to the drawings,
Structural spar 44 is formed from a plurality of structural strips 52 axially aligned. At least one or more of structural strips 52 are made from a shape memory alloy forming shape memory alloy strips 54. The use of shape memory alloy strips 54 exploit the difference between spar open channel stiffness and closed channel stiffness to change the shape of structural spar 44. Shape memory alloy strips 54 are used to replace one or more structural strips 52 of structural spar 44. Any suitable shape memory alloy may be used, for example, but not limited to, nickel-titanium based alloys, nickel-titanium-platinum based alloys, indium-titanium based alloys, nickel-aluminum based alloys, nickel-aluminum-platinum based alloys, nickel-gallium based alloys, copper based alloys, gold-cadmium based alloys, iron-platinum based alloys, iron-palladium based alloys, silver-cadmium based alloys, indium-cadmium based alloys, manganese-copper based alloys, ruthenium-niobium based alloys, ruthenium-tantalum based alloys, titanium based alloys, iron based alloys, and the like.
Two-way shape memory materials are characterized by a shape transition both upon heating from the martensite phase to the austenite phase, as well as upon cooling from the austenite phase back to the martensite phase. Shape memory alloy structures that exhibit a two-way shape memory effect are fabricated from a shape memory alloy composition that will revert to its “remembered” low-temperature shape. Two-way shape memory behavior is imparted by training the shape memory material through processing. Such processing can include extreme deformation of the material while in the austenite phase, and heating-cooling under constraint, load, and/or sheer. Once the material has been trained to exhibit the two-way shape memory effect, the shape change between the low and high temperature states is generally reversible and persists through a high number of thermal cycles.
Shape memory alloy strips 54 may be trained to deform the desired austenite (e.g., twisted or bent) shape. In one embodiment, shape memory alloy strips 54 are trained under shear. When the shape memory alloy material is cooled to the martensite phase, shape memory alloy strips 54 revert back to the non-deformed shape of shape memory alloy strips 54.
A temperature control system 56 (shown in
Referring to
A sample finite element analysis was performed to show the ability of shape memory alloy integrated into a spar to twist the spar by the application of heat.
Shape memory alloy active spars 44 and 90 described above may be used in aircraft wings or empennages, rotors, and other aero and non-aero structures, components and elements, including ground structures and ground based vehicles, water based structures, and vehicles. The use of shape memory alloy materials in spars 44 and 90 facilitate twisting, bending, and other configurations of spars 44 and 90. Changing the configuration of spars 44 and 90 may facilitate aerodynamic optimization of aircraft wings, rotors, and/or aero structures. Aerodynamic optimization may produce cost savings, for example, fuel savings that may be attributed to increased envelope performance.
This written description uses examples to disclose the disclosure, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the disclosure, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the disclosure is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3042371 | Fanti | Jul 1962 | A |
3764227 | Albertzart | Oct 1973 | A |
3930626 | Croswell, Jr. | Jan 1976 | A |
4400642 | Kiraly | Aug 1983 | A |
4518444 | Albrecht et al. | May 1985 | A |
4637962 | Albrecht et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4868447 | Lee et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5114104 | Cincotta et al. | May 1992 | A |
5224826 | Hall | Jul 1993 | A |
5374011 | Lazarus et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5440193 | Barrett | Aug 1995 | A |
5611874 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619177 | Johnson | Apr 1997 | A |
5662294 | Maclean et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5869189 | Hagood, IV et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6015263 | Morris | Jan 2000 | A |
6048622 | Hagood et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6065934 | Jacot et al. | May 2000 | A |
6182929 | Martin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209824 | Caton et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260567 | Gruensfelder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6419187 | Buter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6499952 | Jacot et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6588709 | Dunne et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6669444 | Alacqua et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6989197 | Schneider | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7037076 | Jacot et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7159398 | Bushnell et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7669799 | Elzey et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7878459 | Mabe et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8043045 | Clark | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8104793 | Browne et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8118264 | Mabe et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8202056 | Rice | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8246303 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20020113499 | von Behrens | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040067134 | Beauchamp et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040197519 | Eizey et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204676 | Anderson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050099261 | Walak | May 2005 | A1 |
20060125291 | Buravalla et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070182146 | Browne et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080302024 | Browne | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090175726 | Rosati et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090212158 | Mabe et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110064579 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110217170 | Buffone et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110255974 | Nanukuttan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110300358 | Blohowiak et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004063093 | Jul 2006 | DE |
2076865 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2078865 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2333334 | Jun 2011 | EP |
S63128529 | Jun 1988 | JP |
H09305233 | Nov 1997 | JP |
03018853 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
China First Office Action for related application No. 201310181121.6 dated Feb. 1, 2016; 21 pp. |
Extended European Search Report for related application 13166811.3 dated Feb. 26, 2016; 7 pp. |
AU Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jul. 29, 2016 for related application 2013200999; 4 pp. |
2nd China Office Action for related application 2013101811216 dated Sep. 21, 2016; 14 pp. |
Canada Office Action for related application 2,806,095 dated Dec. 2, 2016, 5 pp. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection, JP Patent Application No. 2013-102787, dated Mar. 7, 2017, 4 pages. |
Chinese Office Action for related application 2013101811216 dated Mar. 28, 2017, 13 pp. |
Fourth China Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2017 for related application 201310181121.6; 21 pp. |
Canada Office Action for related application 2,806,095 dated Sep. 26, 2017, 4 pp. |
EP Examination Report for related application 13166811.3 dated Sep. 17, 2018; 6 pp. |
Chopra, Inderjit; “Development of a Smart Rotor”; Proceedings of the European Rotorcraft Forum, Cernobbio, Italy; Sep. 14-16, 1993; vol. 2, pp. N6-00. |
CA Office Action for related application 2,806,095 dated Jul. 11, 2018; 4 pp. |
China Office Action for related application 201310181121.6 dated Mar. 30, 2018; 19 pp. |
Chopra, Inderjit; “Development of a Smart Rotor”, Proceedings of the European Rotorcraft Forum, Cernobbio, Sep. 14-16, 1993; vol. 2, pp. 11-14. |
European Application Serial No. 19205464.1, Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130309089 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |