Shaped-charge liner

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6354219
  • Patent Number
    6,354,219
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 21, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 12, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A liner for a explosive shaped charge, such as those used in perforating operations in oil and gas wells, is formed from a powdered metal mixture that includes molybdenum. The molybdenum allows a higher density liner to be formed to create denser jets for achieving deeper penetration, but without the negative effects that often accompany the use of higher density materials. The molybdenum may be used in the amount of 0.5% to 25% by weight of the metal mixture, with tungsten and other constituents forming the remainder of the mixture.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates to shaped explosive charges, and in particular to a liner material used in shaped charges, such as those used in oil and gas wells.




2. Description of the Prior Art




Shaped charges for use in oil and gas well perforation and retrieval operations typically will consist of a casing which houses a quantity of explosive and a liner formed from a compressed-powder metal mixture. Materials used for such liners are well known and include copper, graphite, tungsten, lead, nickel and tin. The purpose of these metals is to allow a reasonably homogeneous mixture with specific properties. When formed under load into a liner, the density and symmetry of the liner can be controlled. By varying the material components, i.e. the material percentages in the matrix, the performance can be controlled.




Over the last few years, the tendency has been to use increasing amounts of tungsten (W) in the mixture to achieve higher density jets that penetrate deeper. One of the problems, however, with these denser powdered metal mixes, is the tendency to cause “slugging” or blockage of the perforation tunnel. This slugging limits the flow of hydrocarbons through the perforation tunnel and into the well bore for recovery. Slugging is attributed to a re-agglomeration of some of the liner materials during the formation of the jet. This can be from the jet itself or the after-jet, known as a “slug” or “carrot.” The higher the density of the liner the more the likelihood of this phenomenon occurring. Therefore those mixtures with highest amounts of wolfram and other high density metals tend to produce the most slugging.




What is therefore needed is a liner material for a shaped charge with a high density to achieve maximum formation penetration, yet which reduces or eliminates those problems associated with prior art liner materials, such as slugging.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An object of the present invention is therefore to provide a means of making a high density charge lining without the disadvantages of slug formation.




Another object of the present invention is to provided a charge liner material comprising at least molybdenum (Mo) and other materials of higher density such as tungsten (W).




Yet another object of the present invention is to provide an improved shaped-charge for forming perforations in a wellbore.




These objects are achieved by providing a liner material for use in a shaped explosive charge, such as those used in oil and gas wells for perforating formations surrounding the borehole of the well. The liner material is formed from a powdered metal mixture that contains molybdenum. The metal mixture may further contain tungsten and other powdered metals. In one embodiment the liner material contains an amount of molybdenum of between about 0.5% to 25% by weight of the metal mixture, with tungsten making up between about 40% to 85% by weight of the metal mixture. The mixture may also contain graphite.




The liner may be formed in a shaped charge having a casing. The casing has a casing wall and a hollow interior. The liner is positioned within the interior of the casing, and an explosive material is disposed within the interior of the casing between the casing wall and the liner. The liner may be formed in a generally conical configuration.




Additional objects, features and advantages will be apparent in the written description which follows.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional view of a shaped charge within a well perforating gun assembly and showing a liner of the shaped charge; and





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional side view of the perforating gun assembly from which the cross-sectional view is of

FIG. 1

is taken along the lines I—I.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




When the explosive in a perforating gun is detonated, the force of the detonation collapses the liner material and ejects it from one end of the charge. The ejected material is a “jet”, which penetrates the casing, the cement around the casing, and a quantity of the formation. It is desirable to penetrate as much of the formation as possible to obtain the highest yield of oil or gas. Thus, the jet formation is critical to the operation of the shaped charge. While a high density material such as tungsten gives deeper penetration into the formation, it also creates slugs that block the perforation. This is due to a re-agglomeration of the molten material instead of dispersal. By changing the constituents that make up the liner, the dynamics of the jet and slug formation can be controlled.




The present invention improves the jet dynamics and slug formation of shaped-charges. Referring to

FIG. 1

, a transverse cross section of a perforating gun assembly


10


is shown.

FIG. 2

shows a longitudinal cross section of the perforating gun assembly


10


. The perforating gun


10


has a tubular carrier


12


having an interior cylinder wall


14


and an exterior cylindrical surface or wall


16


. A cylindrical charge tube


18


is disposed within the tubular carrier


12


and is concentric with the tubular carrier


12


. The outside diameter of the charge tube


18


is such that an annular space


20


is created between the outer surface of the charge tube


18


and the inner wall


14


of the carrier


12


.




An explosive shaped charge


22


has a frusto-conical charge case


24


. The charge case


24


is typically formed from steel, die cast aluminum, or zinc alloys and has an interior surface or wall


26


that defines a hollow interior of the charge case


24


. The charge case


24


is open at the outer end and tapers inward. Disposed within the interior of the case


24


is a liner


28


having a generally conical or frusto-conical configuration. The liner


28


tapers inward from a base


30


, located at the outer end, to a nose portion


32


. The liner


28


is open at the base


30


and has a hollow interior. As discussed infra, the liner


28


is formed from a powdered metal matrix that is compressed under high pressure to the desired configuration and density.




Disposed between the liner


28


and interior wall


26


of the casing


24


is an explosive material


34


. The explosive material


34


extends from the interior of the case


24


through channel


36


formed in the innermost end of the case


24


. A pair of ears


38


extend from the channel


36


of the case


24


and receive a detonating cord


40


for detonating the explosive


34


of the shaped charge


22


.




As shown in

FIG. 2

, a plurality of shaped charges


22


are mounted in the charge tube


18


and the perforating gun assembly


10


is mounted within a wellbore (not shown) When the shaped charges


22


of the perforating gun assembly


10


are detonated, the liner


28


disintegrates forming a jet that penetrates through the casing (not shown) of the wellbore and into the surrounding formation to form a perforation.




As discussed previously, the liner


28


is formed from a powdered metal mixture that is compressed at high pressures to form a solid mass in the desired shape. A high density metal must be included in the mixture in order to achieve the desired effect from the explosive force. Common high density metals used include copper and tungsten, but other high density metals can also be used. The mixture of metals typically contains various other ductile metals being combined within the matrix to serve as a binder material. Other binder metals include nickel, lead, silver, gold, zinc, iron, tin, antimony, tantalum, cobalt, bronze and uranium. Powdered graphite is also commonly used and serves as lubricant during the formation of the liner.




It has been found that the inclusion of molybdenum in the metal matrix enhances both the jet formation and density of the jet formed and retards re-agglomeration of the liner materials that form slugging or blockage of the perforation tunnel. Molybdenum has been found to have higher shock velocities than conventional constituents of the liner matrix, such as lead, copper or tungsten. With the addition of molybdenum to the mixture, the reduction or elimination of the slugging phenomenon results and a cleaner perforation is formed. Further, the higher shock velocity imparted to the charge by the addition of the molybdenum increases the overall depth of penetration of the jet.




In the present invention, molybdenum is added to the matrix and may be used to replace, in whole or in part, one of the other ductile metals otherwise used in the metal matrix. The molybdenum also allows higher amounts of tungsten to be used to achieve a higher density mixture, thus increased penetration into the formation. Another benefit of the molybdenum is that it provides lubricating effects so that the graphite lubricant typically used can be reduced or eliminated.




The liner mixture may consist of between 0.5% to 25% molybdenum, 60% to 85% tungsten, with other ductile malleable metals comprising 10% to 35%, and from 0% to 1% graphite. All percentages given are based upon the total weight of the powdered mixture. Table 1 shows the ranges percent composition of metals that may be used for the liner based on percentage by weight of the total powdered mixture.












TABLE 1











Percentage Range of Component Metals in






Charge of the Invention.














COMPONENT




PERCENTAGE











Molybdenum (Mo)




0.5-25% 







Copper (Cu)




 0-10%







Tungsten (W)




60-85%







Lead (Pb)




10-19%







Graphite (C)




0-1%















Table 2 shows representative data from tests performed on the charge of the invention as compared to other commonly used charges. These data show that the depth of penetration into the wellbore (TTP) is greatest when molybdenum is present in the metal mixture. Thus, the shaped charge of the invention (NTX liner) give the best results. As discussed above, an increase in tungsten tends to increase slugging, which is born out in the data of Table 2. The “Western Atlas” (WA) liner having 80% tungsten had a TTP value of 18.13 inches, but a slug length of 3.38, the longest of the three example tests. Using the higher density tungsten is desirable to obtain high penetration, but results in the negative effect of forming slugs in the perforation. Further, the “NT” shaped-charges which contain only 55% tungsten had a relatively low TTP, and also a high slug length, both values being undesirable. By adding molybdenum to the metal mixture to a 15% (by weight) level, the amount of added tungsten can be increased, thus increasing the TTP, while decreasing the slug length. These data show the increased depth of bore penetration and lower slug length by using the mixture of molybdenum and tungsten of the present invention.




The data in Table 2 also indicate that using molybdenum may also improve the shock velocity of the liner. This is indicated by the 19.57 TTP value, being larger than even the WA value which contains more tungsten. An increase in the shock velocity of the liner will improve the depth of penetration of the jet into the surrounding formation, thus improving the performance of the shaped-charge.












TABLE 2











Comparison of Liner Performance of Present






Invention with Other Shaped-Charges.

















Percent




TTP




Slug Length







Liner Type




Tungsten




(inches)




(inches)











NT




55%




17.60




2.75







NT




55%




15.20




4.70







NT




55%




17.60




2.60







NT




55%




18.20




3.75







NT




55%




15.80




2.20







NT




55%




16.90




2.80








Averages




16.88




3.13







NTX(15% Mo)




70%




20.00




2.75







NTX(15% Mo)




70%




19.25




2.25







NTX(15% Mo)




70%




19.50




0.00







NTX(15% Mo)




70%




19.00




3.00







NTX(15% Mo)




70%




19.38




2.00







NTX(15% Mo)




70%




20.30




2.20








Averages




19.57




2.03







WA




80%




17.50




4.50







WA




80%




20.50




3.25







WA




80%




18.00




4.25







WA




80%




17.25




3.50







WA




80%




16.75




1.25







WA




80%




18.80




3.50








Averages




18.13




3.38















The shaped charge liner has several advantages over the prior art. The inclusion of molybdenum in the liner matrix allows materials to be used that create a higher density liner to achieve deeper penetration yet reduces slugging and re-agglomeration effects that are undesirable in many applications.




The present invention allows for deeper penetration of the jet of a shaped charge into the formation due to the higher shock velocity imparted to the charge by the molybdenum, thus improving the oil or gas yield in an operation.




The molybdenum containing lining of the invention also provides lubricating effects during the formation of the liner, thus decreasing the need for graphite in the metal mixture.




Although the invention has been described with reference to a specific embodiment, this description is not meant to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications of the disclosed embodiment as well as alternative embodiments of the invention will become apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description of the invention. While the invention has been shown in only one of its forms, it is not thus limited but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.



Claims
  • 1. A shaped explosive charge comprising:a casing having an interior wall and a hollow interior; a liner formed from a powdered metal mixture compressed at high pressures to form a solid mass containing between about 0.5% to 25% molybdenum, 60% to 85% tungsten, with other ductile malleable metals comprising 10% to 35%, and up to 1% graphite, the solid mass being positioned within the interior of the casing; and an explosive material disposed within the interior of the casing between the interior wall and the liner.
  • 2. The explosive charge of claim 1, wherein:the metal mixture of the liner further contains a metal selected from the group consisting of copper, nickel, lead, silver, gold, zinc, iron, tin, antimony, tantalum, cobalt, bronze and uranium.
  • 3. The explosive charge of claim 1, wherein:the metal mixture of the liner contains by weight of the metal mixture up to about 10% copper and between about 10% to 19% lead.
  • 4. The explosive charge of claim 1, wherein:the metal mixture of the liner is formed into a generally conical configuration.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

Benefit is herein claimed of the filing date under 35 U.S.C. §§ 119 and/or 120, and 37 CFR § 1.78 to U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/083.931, filed on May 1, 1998, entitled “Shaped-Charge Liner”.

US Referenced Citations (10)
Number Name Date Kind
3675575 Bailey et al. Jul 1972 A
3854941 Morrow, III et al. Dec 1974 A
4174213 Fukui et al. Nov 1979 A
4400349 Kudo et al. Aug 1983 A
4747350 Szecket May 1988 A
5279228 Ayer Jan 1994 A
5331895 Bourne et al. Jul 1994 A
5494636 Dupoiron et al. Feb 1996 A
5523048 Stinson et al. Jun 1996 A
5569873 Walters et al. Oct 1996 A
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/083931 May 1998 US