Patent Grant
10921089
Explosively-propelled liquids are used to disrupt explosive devices, including improvised explosive devices (IEDs). One system relies on mass-focusing shaped charges to propel a liquid fluid on target.
There are several commercial and improvised shaped charges that drive water and each have their strengths and weaknesses. A common method is to attach the explosives to a plastic former which is either seated inside the fluid, sandwiched between fluid chambers, or is on the outside surface of the fluid container. Pressure fields are produced by shaping explosives into hemispherical, linear (wedge or hemi-cylindrical), rod and conical charge geometries. When the explosives are initiated, shocks form inside the water column and reflect off of the free field surfaces. Various parameters such as angles and corners within the container of fluid or on the explosive former define the pressure-time history of the gases and shocks acting on the water. There are regions of high and low pressure that will differentially accelerate the water to form a jet. High pressure regions are due to a Mach-stem effect which are formed by collisions of shocks, usually along a central axis or plane. A slug of water is the projectile, and water behind the explosives traps the gases, thus increasing the duration of pressure acting on the slug. Shocks can also reflect off the free field boundary of the tamper's rear surface and move back into the water, amplifying the pressure.
A common charge configuration of mass focusing shaped charges driving a liquid fluid is linear and are symmetric along a bisecting plane. In the case of the Hydrajet™ disrupter (U.S. Pat. No. 6,269,725 by Cherry), a tall pyramidal wedge former of explosives with an angle of 90 degrees is utilized and placed inside a rectangular shaped fluid-filled chamber. Cherry proposes an adjustable apex angle and a scalability in disrupter size. Another example of a linear charge is the mod series of disrupters (U.S. Pat. No. 6,584,908). In that case, rather than a wedge, it is an arc section of a hemi-cylindrical shape. Alford et al. uses two separate water chambers and sandwiches sheet explosives between them. The jet profile is similar to the Hydrajet™ disrupter. Linear high explosive charges that drive water form blade shaped water jets. A tomographic cross sectioning of the jet would have the profile of a narrow ellipse.
Omni-directional mass jetting high explosive disrupters are good at delivering high impulse to a target and use a rod shaped explosive charge at the core of a cylindrically-shaped container. Those tools have axial symmetry. Omnidirectional tools produce low density spatial jets that particulate into droplets. Examples of these are the Mineral Water Bottle charge and the Bottler charge (U.S. Pat. No. 9,322,624). The bottler charge has three hemi-cylindrical indentations on the outer bottle surface that create a shock cavity effect and linear fluid jets at the center of each one.
Some water-based charges are more effective at perforating barriers such as liquid follow-through (LIFT) charges (U.S. Pat. No. 4,955,939). Conical LIFT charges have an air void. The explosives are rectangular prisms or right angle cylinders and oriented so that the flat face of the cylinder it abutting the water. The detonator is positioned coaxially down the center of the charge. The explosive detonation wave shock couples at the water interface producing an approximate planar shock front that travels into the water surrounding the hollow cavity causing the water to collapse into the void and jet forward. The thin plastic liner collapses on itself and flows at the leading edge of the jetting fluid. Another example of conical LIFT charge is the Rocksmith Precision Closer™ disrupter (U.S. Pat. No. 8,677,902). The cone angles are approximately 45 to 60 degrees and the jets are moving at extremely high velocities, traveling in some cases in excess of Mach 10. An example of a linear LIFT charge is the Stingray™ disrupter (U.S. Pat. No. 8,091,479 B1). LIFT charges generally produce narrow fluid jets of low mass. They have high jet stretch rates and are good barrier penetrators but yield low bulk work on media and low impulse in our testing. As a result, they are relatively poor general disruption tools.
Although improvised conical shapes are very efficient with respect to the ratio of charge mass to projectile mass (C/M), they are impractical because they have a high risk of shock initiation of an IED's main charge. We have demonstrated that a mass focusing, five-inch diameter conical shaped charge with a 60 degree apex/cone angle loaded with the lowest possible Primasheet® explosive charge will shock initiate most common propellants, which make them unacceptable for IED disruption. Standard conical shaped charges have cone angles between 45 and 80 degrees.
From the foregoing, there is a need in the art for shaped charges that can be tailored to any of a variety of applications, while also ensuring that the generated liquid fluid jet has appropriate characteristics to minimize risk of unwanted shock initiation without sacrificing target disruption capabilities.
The shaped charges provided herein address the above-discussed problems by specially designed surface shapes that support a shape-conforming explosive and that ensure a fluid is appropriately propelled from the shaped charge toward the target. This is achieved by the special geometry that can be generally described herein as a catenary paraboloid, specifically the plastic shell and facing distal end of the plastic body in which the plastic shell is positioned. The fluid immerses the plastic shell and the fluid portion between the shell surface and the distal end of the plastic body is the projectile region corresponding to liquid that will be propelled toward a target upon detonation of the explosive supported by the plastic shell surface.
Provided herein are shaped charges for focusing a fluid mass. The shaped charges are particularly suited for disrupting improvised explosive devices. The shaped charges can comprise a plastic shell having a surface with a geometric shape configured to support a shape-conforming explosive. In this manner, the geometric shape is configured to provide desired explosive characteristics on the supported explosive to force a fluid mass toward a target. The geometric shape comprises a truncated cone having an open distal end and a closed proximal end, the closed proximal end having a smoothly-curved concave shape, an outer circumference with a plurality of cut-outs radially spaced around the outer circumference. The geometric shape is axially-symmetric about a central longitudinal axis. A cylindrical plastic body has an interior volume for containing a liquid and the plastic shell, the cylindrical plastic body having: a plastic body closed distal end having a geometric shape that is substantially matched to the concave shape of the plastic shell closed proximal end; a plastic body proximal end that faces the plastic body distal end; wherein the plastic shell is concentrically positioned to the cylindrical plastic body with respect to the central longitudinal axis. A channel extends through the cylindrical plastic body proximal end and terminates at the plastic shell surface at a contact position coincident with the central longitudinal axis, wherein the channel is configured to accommodate a detonator. In this manner, a detonator can be operably connected to the shape-conforming explosive at the central longitudinal axis for precise and well-controlled detonation.
The shaped charge may further comprise the shape-conforming explosive mated to at least a portion of the plastic shell surface.
The plastic body proximal end may comprise an end cap that fluidically seals the liquid and plastic shell in the cylindrical plastic body interior volume.
The shaped charge may further comprise a detonator in a press-fit configuration in the channel and, when present, the shape-conforming explosive, to fluidically seal the liquid in the interior volume.
The shaped charge is compatible with a range of curvatures, including a concave shape that is a catenary paraboloid.
In use, the plastic shell is laterally positioned in the interior volume of the cylindrical plastic body to form a tamper region having a tamper length and a projectile region having a projectile length, wherein a ratio of the tamper length to the projectile length is between 1:1 to 2.5:1.
The cone angle can be selected from a range that is greater than or equal to 90° and less than or equal to 150°. This reflects that the invention is compatible with a range of geometries and fluid mass characteristics. For example, depending on the application of interest, including target characteristics such as barrier properties, stand-off distance, and desired fluid impact and post-impact characteristics, the cone angle, lengths, curvatures are varied. This can impact the surface area and, therefore, the amount of explosives supported by the surface.
The shaped charge is compatible with a range of interior volumes, including between 32 and 7040 fluid ounces and/or an outer diameter of between 3 inches and 25 inches.
The shaped charge may have a transition region on the plastic shell surface for smoothly transitioning from the truncated cone to the smoothly-curved concave shape. In this aspect, “smoothly transitioning” refers to a continuous slope such that there are not observable discontinuities or sharp edges on the surface.
In an embodiment, the plastic shell closed proximal end has a diameter that is between 30% and 80% of the diameter of the open end.
The shaped charges described herein may further comprise a fluid positioned in the interior volume. In an embodiment, the fluid is a highly efficient energy transfer (HEET) fluid, including any of those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/731,834 titled “DISRUPTER DRIVEN HIGHLY EFFICIENT ENERGY TRANSFER FLUID JETS” filed Aug. 18, 2017, which is specifically incorporated by reference herein for the HEET fluids described therein. Specific examples include a combination of liquid and solid particles, such that the HEET fluid combines the advantages of both water and solid projectiles as they have viscoelastic behavior and can have solid particles mixed into a fluid, including sand mixtures, and/or is a high viscosity fluid such as corn syrup, molasses or the like.
In an embodiment, the plastic body has a sidewall thickness and a front face thickness, wherein the sidewall thickness is between 2 and 4 times thicker than the front face thickness. The sidewall is optionally formed of a plastic material having a higher density than a plastic material of the front face. Examples include, but are not limited to, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), Polyterafluroethylene, Polyoxymethylene (POM) such as Delrin® plastic, phenolic Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene terephthalate (PETE), Chlorinated Polyvinylchloride, Phenolic plastics. Similarly, sidewall relative to front face density may have a ratio up to 1.5.
The shaped charge may be further described in terms of one or more of: the truncated cone has a truncated cone angle of between 90° and 150°; the smoothly-curved concave shape corresponds to a paraboloid; and/or the truncated cone and paraboloid transition at a transition region, and the transition region is approximately tangential to both the truncated cone and the paraboloid.
The shaped charge may have an explosive weight per unit area of between 1 g/in2 and 6 g/in2.
The shaped charge may further comprise: a spherical projectile adjacent to the exterior distal surface of the plastic body and placed at the center of the concavity along the longitudinal axis. The spherical projectile is preferably a polyball formed of a polyurethane. The spherical projectile preferably has a spherical geometry and diameter that is between about 10% to 50% of the diameter of the plastic shell open distal end. In this configuration, the spherical projectile is physically separated from the fluid contained in the plastic body by the thickness of the wall of the plastic body distal surface.
The shaped charge has a geometric shape configured to generate a liquid jet having an annular cross-section upon impact with a target, including specifically the plastic shell surface and cylindrical plastic body closed distal end. This annular cross-section (e.g., a ring of liquid having a cylindrical outer surface) is a unique jet-shape that reduces shock impulse and thus enables the shaped charge to have twice the explosive load of comparable commercial disrupters without causing shock initiation of explosives on impact.
The shape conforming explosive is preferably a sheet explosive or a detonation cord explosive connected to a distal-facing surface of the plastic shell.
The shaped charge has a geometry configured to reduce a forward velocity gradient of a generated fluid jet. In this manner, the liquid fluid jet maintains integrity after explosive detonation.
The outer surface of the plastic body distal end preferably comprises a plurality of scores to generate petal formation, prevent cylindrical plastic body impact on the target during use and minimize risk of unwanted shock initiation. The scores may be on the outer-facing and/or inner-facing surface of the plastic body distal end. The scores may be characterized as recess features in the surface having a penetration depth. Exemplary penetration depths correspond to between 10% and 90% wall thickness, such as about 30%-60%. The exact penetration depth is variable in that the purpose of the scores is to generate structural faults, such that upon explosive motion of the liquid fluid mass, the distal end surface of the plastic body physically separates and falls apart to avoid impact force on a barrier target. Without such scoring, there is a risk of the distal end being carried along with the front face of the fluid jet and making impact on the barrier target, with attendant potential uncontrolled path in the target interior. Scoring the front face to induce petal formation of the plastic and using low density and high ductility plastic (Polypropylene, polyethylene) prevents the shaped charge body plastic from impacting at close standoffs.
Also provided herein are methods of explosively driving a fluid to disrupt an explosive target using any of the shaped charges described herein. The method may comprise the steps of: providing a shaped charge of the instant invention with a liquid positioned in the interior volume, wherein the plastic shell is immersed in the liquid; aligning the mass focusing shaped charge with an explosive target; initiating a detonation wave in the shape-conforming explosive that travels substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis, wherein the geometric shape and position of the plastic shell and the plastic body distal end are configured to generate a tamp and timing of rarefaction waves to increase a pressure duration and amplitude to drive the liquid toward the explosive target; and generating a liquid jet having an annular cross-section upon explosive target impact to reduce shock impulse and minimize risk of target explosive shock initiation. In this manner, the explosive target is disrupted.
Also provided herein are methods of making any of the shaped charges described herein, such as by forming the plastic shell and the plastic body, wherein the plastic body can accommodate the plastic shell in an interior volume, along with liquid, such that the plastic shell (and explosive supported by the plastic shell) is immersed in the liquid.
Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, there may be discussion herein of beliefs or understandings of underlying principles relating to the devices and methods disclosed herein. It is recognized that regardless of the ultimate correctness of any mechanistic explanation or hypothesis, an embodiment of the invention can nonetheless be operative and useful.
In the following description, numerous specific details of the devices, device components and methods of the present invention are set forth in order to provide a thorough explanation of the precise nature of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to those of skill in the art that the invention can be practiced without these specific details.
In general, the terms and phrases used herein have their art-recognized meaning, which can be found by reference to standard texts, journal references and contexts known to those skilled in the art. The following definitions are provided to clarify their specific use in the context of the invention.
“Fluid” refers to a liquid-based material that is contained in the interior volume of the plastic body and that immerses the plastic shell surface. The shaped charges are compatible with any number of liquids, including water and high-density liquids, such as corn syrup. As described herein and at U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/731,874, the fluid may be a high energy efficient (HEET) fluid. The fluid may comprise solid particles suspended in a liquid medium.
“Focusing” refers to the ability to force liquid in a desired direction with desired properties related to jet formation, stability, and impact pressure or force against a target, including post-barrier penetration.
The term “substantially matched” refers to two components that are similar. In the context of a geometric shape, it refers to a deviation from absolute correspondence that does not adversely impact functional properties associated with the fluid jet and target disruption. The term is intended to reflect that the shaped charges provided herein are able to tolerate differences between surfaces (e.g., plastic shell surface and cylindrical plastic body distal end) without significant degradation in a liquid jet parameter. As desired, the term may be optionally quantitatively defined, such as curve parameters that differ by less than 10% from each other, such as curvature, distances, and any parameters associated with a corresponding curve fit, such as:
Unless otherwise defined, “approximately” or “substantially” refers to a value that is within 10% of a desired or true value, and can correspondingly include identically matched.
“Proximal” and “distal” are relative to the detonator and target. A distal position is further from the detonator and closer to the target than a proximal position. The terms are useful in describing relative positions of components.
The invention can be further understood by the following non-limiting examples.
The Catenary Advanced Technology (CAT) disrupter is a mass focusing shaped charge that explosively drives a large volume of water, or other liquid such as Highly Efficient Energy Transfer (HEET) fluid as described in any of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/731,874, U.S. Pat. No. 10,451,378, U.S. Pub. No. 2020/0025508 each to Vabnick et al. The liquids jet at relatively high velocity to disrupt improvised explosive devices (IEDs). The jet may perforate the barrier(s) of a bomb, destroys fuzing components and causes separation of the firing train to include expulsion of the explosive main charge. The CAT disrupter has an axially symmetric geometry. The plastic shell that shapes the explosives (also referred herein as an HE former) is a hybridization of a truncated cone at the opening which transitions to a smooth-curved surface such as a parabola at the closed end. Sheet explosives are mated to the surface of the HE former. An enhanced water charge (EWC) was previously developed using a plastic bowl lined with sheet explosives or lined with overlapping wraps of detonation cord. As with all mass focusing shaped charges, the CAT disrupter uses a Mach-stem effect to cause a higher pressure field along its axis of longitudinal symmetry. The water near the center is accelerated more than the water in the periphery. The CAT disrupter fluid jet tip can be explosively propelled in a range from transonic to supersonic velocities. The jet velocity can be controlled by the amount of explosives applied to the explosive former or by modifying disrupter geometric parameters to include cone angle and tamper mass-to-projectile mass ratio. Due to the HE former's parabolic base, the water is collimated and has a greatly reduced forward velocity gradient (FVG) compared to other mass focusing charges. This results in unprecedented penetration and effective working distance. The CAT shaped charge can disrupt IEDs up to four times farther than other fluid mass focusing disrupters of comparable size. Modification of the cone angle can also be used to change the jet profile including the cross sectional area at any point along its length.
The previous EWC improvised mass focusing disrupter used a plastic food storage bowl to hold a large volume of water that was driven at high velocity and formed jets over short distances. That EWC tool was good at mass expulsion of an IED main charge, a desirable characteristic of any IED disrupter. The bowl had a scalable and consistent shape; its structure had a flat bottom and curved sides. The rim diameter was generally 50% larger than the base. Unfortunately, the EWC had a large explosive charge mass to fluid mass ratio (C/M). That EWC required a considerable amount of explosives to perform its function, which is about three to four times the explosive quantity used inside an instant CAT disrupter of comparable size. That EWC lacked a tamper due to the complexity of construction and had a flat face which was made from the bowl lid. As described herein, however, a flat disc shaped lid adds to the inefficiency of the charge. With the advent of CTH hydrocode modeling (Sandia National Laboratories), computer-aided design, and 3D printing, developing complex geometries to dramatically increase efficiency and performance of mass focusing water charges became possible and all these technologies are used in concert to create the instant CAT high explosive shaped charge. The CAT disrupter drives a jet of water in roughly a right angle cylinder profile that is notably longer than most disrupter jets and, as discussed herein, can have an annular cross-section upon target impact. The reduced FVG makes it very stable in flight having an effective working distance of two to three times that of current commercially available mass focusing high explosive disrupters.
One embodiment of the CAT disrupter has a container volume of approximately 64 ounces and drives a water slug that is 5 to 10 times the volume of the water projectile in a propellant-driven water cannon/dearmer such as the percussion actuated non-electric (PAN) disrupter (U.S. Pat. No. 4,957,027) or similar dearmer.
The CAT disrupter jet profile in cross section is similar to the jet formed by the PAN with the Reverse Velocity Jet Tamper (ReVJeT) disrupter enhancer adapter (U.S. Pat. No. 10,451,378). The CAT disrupter average jet cross sectional area is significantly larger and travels at higher velocity. Using the maximum explosive load tested, the velocity of the CAT disrupter jet tip averages five times faster than that of a PAN jet.
Several inefficiencies in mass focusing explosive shaped charges were minimized in the design of the CAT disrupter. A dominant destructive hydrodynamic factor in all mass focusing high explosive tools is the FVG. The jet will break up into droplets or particles, thus losing the jet's effective density and its ability to transfer momentum and energy. The FVG can be explained qualitatively by dividing the jet into discrete elements. Proceeding from the rear of the jet to its front, each element is progressively faster. The rate of jet stretch increases with explosive load. The FVG can be complex and may not be linear. The jet stretches apart by this hydrodynamic stress. Atomization also occurs from the turbulence inside the jet and air drag along its front and sides. The CAT disrupter FVG is considerably reduced compared to other disrupter high explosive shaped charges described herein.
The CAT disrupter can also be used to drive HEET fluids (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/731,874 titled “High Energy Efficient Transfer Fluids” filed Aug. 18, 2017). There are experimentally demonstrated advantages which show that higher density liquids have improved penetration, notable increases in bulk work and momentum transfer and, due to their higher mass, can lower jet velocities. The latter is important when impact sensitive explosives are present inside an IED. Due to the hydrodynamic characteristics of the jet, the impact pressures have a squared dependence with jet velocity. The shock Hugoniot properties of the HEET fluids also may contribute to the reduced risk of shock initiation of explosives inside an IED when they are impacted by a disrupter jet.
Provided herein are CAT disrupter conical regions having an apex angle greater than 90 degrees and less than 150 degrees. One embodiment uses a 109 degree angle which results in the maximum water volume to minimum surface area of the conical zone, thus minimizing the amount of sheet explosives in the charge. The base region of the CAT disrupter is parabolic and not conical. This shape is repeated on the front shock wave shaper; however, rather than having a discrete transition, the curve is tangential to the linear region of the cone so there is a smooth transition between these regions. The diameter of the parabola is 50% of the diameter of the conical belt's rim. The explosives of the CAT are back-tamped with water to increase the duration that the pressure is sustained and peak pressure for a given explosive charge mass. The velocity range of the CAT disrupter can be transonic using the minimum thickness Primasheet® flexible sheet explosive and supersonic with the maximum load tested. This velocity range makes it ideal for the Counter-IED mission by controlling impact pressures using a spectrum of velocities. We have demonstrated that the CAT disrupter jet can be driven with twice the explosive loads of comparable-sized commercial disrupters without causing shock initiation of impact sensitive explosives. Hydrocode modeling reveals an annular jet tip in cross section. The reduced area of impact and jet bunching help reduce the shock impulse.
A detonator is coaxially seated in contact with charge apex and initiated. The resultant detonation wave shock couples into the water and shock waves move inside the fluid. Due to shock impedance at the water-container interface, the shock rarefaction waves reflect back into the water slug which can further contribute to water movement. In one embodiment of the CAT disrupter, the sidewalls of the fluid container were three times thicker than the front face and used higher density PVC compared to the front face which was made from ASA material. Tests of CAT disrupters constructed from uniformly thick ASA sidewalls and front were less efficient at penetration and impulse than the CAT disrupter embodiment using a thick PVC side wall. Provided is a method of using inertial confinement and shock impedance to increase the efficiency of the CAT disrupter. Thus, PETE plastic on the side wall can further improve the efficiency of the CAT disrupter given it is of higher density than PVC. PVC and PETE are 1.35 and 1.5 times the density of ASA, respectively.
We observed that thickening the wall on the front face of the charge and using a high strength, brittle plastic had negative effects on performance. High explosive disrupters whose front surface are made from low ultimate tensile strength and high tensile elongation plastics such as low density polyethylene (LDPE), high density polyethylene (HDPE), or polypropylene (PP) should have better performance with respect to jet velocity, penetration and impulse. Wall thicknesses between 0.02 inches and 0.08 inches result in good performance. Brittle plastics that have similar densities to water fracture into particles that travel along with the jet and resulted in explosive initiation on impact with targets filled with common explosives.
Due to difficulty in manufacture, most commercial mass focusing high explosive charges have flat fronts, which may cause cavitation bubbles inside the water slug that forms the jet. Shock waves can cause tensor stress regions within the water. These extreme low pressure zones may result in cavitation and the water boiling at room temperature. The gas bubble formed can interfere with jet formation. For these reasons, any of the shaped charges provided herein do not have a flat front (distal end). The CAT disrupter has a front (plastic body distal end) that is coaxially aligned with the explosive former (plastic shell distal end) and of similar geometry: a truncated cone at the opening which transitions smoothly to a parabola at the closed end. This is referred herein as “substantially matched” surfaces. CTH modeling shows shaping of the water-air boundary causes the rarefaction waves to dissipate in amplitude with distance from the front surface of the charge and thus minimizes the cavitation effect. The front face of the CAT disrupter is, therefore, also referred to as the rarefaction wave dampener. It is a mild indentation compared to what is seen on LIFT charges, but likely contributes to jet formation.
The CAT disrupter explosive cone angle compatible with various angles, with the specific angle selected to achieve a desired jet velocity, jet length, and jet diameter. A sectioning of the CAT formed jet reveals an annular cross section toward and at the jet tip. The CAT disrupter is geometrically scalable. Examples include two sizes, a 64-ounce volume and an approximately 150-ounce volume. When geometric scaling is used, the 150-ounce disrupter is predicted, with the appropriate explosive scaling, to have a 33% increase in penetration and impulse and a 60% increase in bulk work compared to the smaller disrupter. In addition, the geometrically scaled larger disrupter will produce the same jet velocity as the smaller disrupter. This means the impact pressures and thereby the risk of shock initiation on impact of explosives will be similar. The CAT charge diameters can be scaled down to 3″ or scaled up to 25″. We can limit the largest size to be that of a 55 gallon drum to use as a general disruption tool against vehicle borne IEDs. The smallest CAT disrupters have tactical applications for dismounted operations or for precision disablement of specific components inside of a bomb.
Controlling the velocity of the jet balances performance with the negative result of shock initiation of target IED explosives due to impact pressures. The jet tip velocity and the jet velocity profile with respect to jet length are manipulated in several ways in the CAT disrupter. Several structural manipulations can accomplish the goal of keeping the velocity of the jet below critical levels that cause shock initiation of explosives on impact. The CAT disrupter parabolic region curvature can be flattened and the cone region angle can be increased to reduce velocity and this also has the benefit of increasing jet diameter. The CAT ratio of tamper region length to projectile region length can also control the jet tip velocity and the ratio can be 1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1 and 2.5:1, and any sub-ranges thereof. Geometrically scaling the disrupter, but not the explosives weight per unit area inside the disrupter, is another method to reduce the jet velocity. Scaling the CAT disrupter such that the diameter ranges from three inches to 25 inches. Changes in net explosive weight and fluid density can also be used to reduce velocity. Furthermore, HEET fluids can be used to increase density. The Hydrajet™ disrupter (U.S. Pat. No. 6,269,725) describes use of clay as a material of higher density, but for the purposes of increasing penetration rather than reducing velocity. The CAT disrupter explosive weight per unit area can be adjusted from 1 gram per square inch to 6 grams per square inch which results in comparable velocities of the PAN water jets to five times the PAN water jet.
During our testing of current commercial mass focusing high explosive charges, their nominal standoffs are approximately one charge diameter. However, increasing the distance from this standoff results in a dramatic loss in momentum transfer and penetration. The CAT disrupter provided herein is the first disrupter tested that increased penetration with standoff to two charge diameters. Furthermore, there was not a significant loss in moment transfer at this farther distance. This improvement is due to the normalized velocity profile within the jet. The effective working distance of the jet did not drop with double the standoff. The hole diameters in layered barriers perforated by the jets were reduced which can be explained by the jet stretching. Accordingly, the shaped charges described herein may be used to increase stand-off distance, including up to and including two charge diameters. Tests using higher explosive weights, showed the CAT disrupter is effective at standoffs up to 12 charge diameters.
Due to the normalized velocity profile of the CAT jet, a high strength, high durometer (80-90) polyurethane ball can be placed at the axial center of the shock wave dampener. The ball can be used as a jet stabilizing projectile (JSP) (U.S. Pat. App. No. 62/884,961 filed Aug. 9, 2019 titled “Fluid Jet Stabilizing Projectile for Enhanced IED”) and behaves similarly to the JSP used with the PAN disrupter and ReVJeT adapter. Based on the predicted jet tip shape being annular, it will promote hydraulic trapping of the polyurethane ball. The polyball seats inside the hollow region of the jet and is trapped by the jet due to its flow properties. The ball will cause a slip stream such that air drag is reduced around the jet tip and a low pressure zone behind the ball will cause the water to flow forward around the rear surface of the ball creating hydraulic stabilization of its flight. The advantages of a JSP for bomb disablement is increased barrier limit thickness and the reduced surface area on impact which is known to lower shock impulse as previously described. Polyurethane has similar shock Hugoniot properties as water and thus reduces the risk of shock initiation of explosives due to shock impedance. The JSP should be 10% to 50% of the CAT container diameter to produce the air drag benefits. In comparison, Rock et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 8,677,902) propose using a small metallic bead in the apex of the hollow void (shock cavity) of their LIFT charge. They propose the small bead material to be copper, steel, lead or depleted uranium, which are at least nine times the density of water. The small bead is explosively driven forward, but does not ride the jet tip. There is an extreme forward velocity gradient in a conical LIFT and the metal bead would not behave like a JSP.
The plastic shell is specially configured to have a desired geometric shape to achieve the desired functional benefits described herein with respect to a subsequently generated fluid projectile.
Views of the outer surfaces of the shaped charge, specifically the cylindrical plastic body, are provided in
The position of the shell surface 40 along the central longitudinal axis can be adjusted by changing the length of the plastic shell 30 stem 42 that accommodates channel 250 for the detonator 260.
A channel 250 is configured to operably connect to a detonator 260 for detonating shape-confirming explosive 150 that is at least partially mated to plastic shell surface 50 (see, e.g.,
Referring to
As illustrated in
Resultant fluid jet profile over time upon detonation of shape-conforming explosives with the detonator are summarized in
All references throughout this application, for example patent documents including issued or granted patents or equivalents; patent application publications; and non-patent literature documents or other source material; are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties, as though individually incorporated by reference, to the extent each reference is at least partially not inconsistent with the disclosure in this application (for example, a reference that is partially inconsistent is incorporated by reference except for the partially inconsistent portion of the reference).
The terms and expressions which have been employed herein are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed. Thus, it should be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by preferred embodiments, exemplary embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims. The specific embodiments provided herein are examples of useful embodiments of the present invention and it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be carried out using a large number of variations of the devices, device components, methods steps set forth in the present description. As will be obvious to one of skill in the art, methods and devices useful for the present methods can include a large number of optional composition and processing elements and steps.
As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a cell” includes a plurality of such cells and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art. As well, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. It is also to be noted that the terms “comprising”, “including”, and “having” can be used interchangeably. The expression “of any of claims XX-YY” (wherein XX and YY refer to claim numbers) is intended to provide a multiple dependent claim in the alternative form, and in some embodiments is interchangeable with the expression “as in any one of claims XX-YY.”
When a group of substituents is disclosed herein, it is understood that all individual members of that group and all subgroups, are disclosed separately. When a Markush group or other grouping is used herein, all individual members of the group and all combinations and subcombinations possible of the group are intended to be individually included in the disclosure.
Every device, system, formulation, combination of components, or method described or exemplified herein can be used to practice the invention, unless otherwise stated.
Whenever a range is given in the specification, for example, a temperature range, a time range, or a composition or concentration range, all intermediate ranges and subranges, as well as all individual values included in the ranges given are intended to be included in the disclosure. It will be understood that any subranges or individual values in a range or subrange that are included in the description herein can be excluded from the claims herein.
All patents and publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the levels of skill of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. References cited herein are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety to indicate the state of the art as of their publication or filing date and it is intended that this information can be employed herein, if needed, to exclude specific embodiments that are in the prior art. For example, when composition of matter are claimed, it should be understood that compounds known and available in the art prior to Applicant's invention, including compounds for which an enabling disclosure is provided in the references cited herein, are not intended to be included in the composition of matter claims herein.
As used herein, “comprising” is synonymous with “including,” “containing,” or “characterized by,” and is inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps. As used herein, “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified in the claim element. As used herein, “consisting essentially of” does not exclude materials or steps that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the claim. In each instance herein any of the terms “comprising”, “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of” may be replaced with either of the other two terms. The invention illustratively described herein suitably may be practiced in the absence of any element or elements, limitation or limitations which is not specifically disclosed herein.
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that starting materials, biological materials, reagents, synthetic methods, purification methods, analytical methods, assay methods, and biological methods other than those specifically exemplified can be employed in the practice of the invention without resort to undue experimentation. All art-known functional equivalents, of any such materials and methods are intended to be included in this invention. The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention that in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed. Thus, it should be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by preferred embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims.
The inventions described herein were invented by employees of the United States Government and thus, may be manufactured and used by or for the U.S. Government for governmental purposes without the payment of royalties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2491516 | Piggot et al. | Dec 1949 | A |
| 3100445 | Poulter | Aug 1963 | A |
| 4046055 | McDanolds et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4955939 | Petrousky et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4957027 | Cherry | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5792977 | Chawla | Aug 1998 | A |
| 6269725 | Cherry | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6439127 | Cherry | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6584908 | Alford | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6644166 | Alexander et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 8091479 | Jakaboski et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8276495 | Chiu et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8677902 | Rock et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 9322624 | Alford et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9322625 | Langner | Apr 2016 | B1 |
| 9360222 | Collier | Jun 2016 | B1 |
| 9404718 | Shaver et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
| 9958245 | Shih | May 2018 | B1 |
| 9976838 | Langner | May 2018 | B1 |
| 10054388 | Langner | Aug 2018 | B1 |
| 10066916 | Vabnick et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
| 10451378 | Vabnick et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10495433 | Langner | Dec 2019 | B1 |
| 20030131749 | Lussier | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20050081706 | Alford | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20110061521 | Gardner et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20180259306 | Trefilov | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20190309606 | Loehken | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20200025508 | Vabnick | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200056858 | Vabnick | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200173761 | Vabnick | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2083894 | Apr 1996 | ES |
| 2083894 | Mar 1982 | GB |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/731,874, filed Aug. 18, 2017. |
