This application is a Reissue Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/639,065, filed on 4 Mar. 2015.
1. Field of the Invention
One or more embodiments pertain to the field of storage and transport bags and containers and to seals for these bags and containers. More particularly, but not by way of limitation, one or more embodiments enable a shaped elastomeric bag with an integrated leak resistant seal. Embodiments may be used for storage, transport, and cooking of food, including liquids, and for other applications. Embodiments may be durable and reusable. Embodiments of the invention incorporate a leak resistant seal to provide enhanced sealing with a mechanism that is integrated into the container.
2. Description of the Related Art
Sealable bags and containers are well known in the art. For example, Ziploc® plastic bags have a zipper-like sealing mechanism integrated into the opening of the bag. More recent innovations have modified sealable bags to be more durable, reusable containers, often based on silicone materials. For example, both Munguia in US Patent Publication 2013/0105352 and LeBoeuf in US Patent Publication 2009/0110335 teach silicone food storage bags with seals.
A limitation of the existing art in sealable bags is that the integrated seal designs provide relatively weak sealing force. For example, Ziploc® bags are closeable, but they are not leakproof. This lack of leak resistance is a consequence of the relatively small sealing area and the simple track and groove shapes of the Ziploc® seal. LeBoeuf discloses a seal with a track and groove, but specifically notes that an additional mechanical clasp may be needed as an added method of closure. Hence the integrated sealing portion of the container disclosed in LeBoeuf may not be leak resistant without external clasping members.
This difficulty in providing an integrated leak resistant seal was taught in 1946 by Koeppel in U.S. Pat. No. 2,500,363. As Koeppel states: “Closures for containers of this nature have been formed in various ways, but when the opening in the bag or container is made sufficiently large to receive ice cubes or relatively large lumps of ice it is difficult to seal the opening effectively. Efforts have been made to overcome this difficulty by providing the container with a thickened portion about the mouth of the opening with complementary zig-zag or tongue and groove surfaces to form a seal. However, even such constructions are ineffective to prevent leakage unless they are pressed together with considerable force.” Koeppel then teaches a design using an external mechanical clip attached to a bag to provide the necessary sealing force. In this sense Koeppel arrives at a similar solution to LeBoeuf using an external clasp.
While use of external clips or mechanical clasps can provide seals, they are less convenient for the user and they require additional manufacturing cost and complexity. Therefore there is a need for an elastomeric container with an integrated leak proof seal, which does not require such additional elements to enhance sealing force.
Embodiments of the invention enable a shaped elastomeric container with an integrated leak resistant seal. Such a container may be used for example to store and transport liquids or solids or both, include food products. Embodiments of the invention may be of various shapes and sizes, including but not limited to rectangular, square, circular, trapezoidal, cylindrical, elliptical, polygonal, cubical, or any convenient shape for the intended use of the container. Embodiments of the invention utilize elastomers among their materials to provide properties such as flexibility, heat-resistance, microbial resistance, and ease of manufacturing. Other materials may be used as well for shaping, strengthening, decorating, or any other purpose. Some embodiments may employ silicone as one of the elastomers in the container. Silicone offers several potential advantages including non-toxicity, stick resistance, ability to be heated such as in an oven, ability to be frozen as in a freezer, and ability to be molded into various shapes in manufacturing processes.
Embodiments of the invention may include two parts of an enclosure, referred to as the top enclosure and the bottom enclosure. The top enclosure and bottom enclosure may be joined along some of their edges to form a container with an opening. The edge nearest the opening is referred to herein as the front edge; the edge opposite the front is referred to as the back edge. The edges running between the back and front are referred to as the left edge and the right edge. The joints between the parts of the enclosure may be made of an elastomer as well, or may be made of other materials. Any joining technique such as molding, gluing, taping, sewing, stapling, welding, or any other technique may be used to form the enclosure. The enclosure may partially surround an inner volume designed for the storage or transport of materials inside the container. In some embodiments the container may be sufficiently rigid so that this inner volume is present even when the container is empty. In other embodiments the container may be designed to collapse when empty so that the inner volume is not apparent unless items are inside the container.
Embodiments may have one or more edges of the enclosures fully or partially open for the insertion and removal of materials. Adjacent to or proximal to these open edges, embodiments may include a seal designed to close off the inner portion of the container that is utilized to open and close the container. In some embodiments the seal includes two elements called press-fit elements that are designed to press together and seal when closed. The press-fit elements are referred to herein as the top press-fit element and the bottom press-fit element. They may be located anywhere on the container where it is necessary or convenient to provide a seal. These press-fit elements may have complementary profiles that come together at a common boundary when the elements are pressed together. Various embodiments of the invention employ designs for the press-fit elements that contribute to the strength of the seal. In some embodiments the seal is designed for leak resistance. For example, some embodiments provide a seal that can hold one to two cups of water inside the container without leaking, even when the container is inverted with the seal pointing downwards.
In one or more embodiments the leak resistance of the seal is enhanced by utilizing sufficient material thickness in the press-fit elements. Thicker material in the press-fit elements increases the sealing force of the seal. In some embodiments the average material thickness of both the upper press-fit element and the lower press-fit element is at least 0.25 cm, in other embodiments, any value up to 0.5 cm, in other embodiments any value between 0.5 cm and 0.75 cm and in other embodiments 1.0 cm, when measured across the common boundary between the press-fit elements. Other embodiments may use even thicker material for greater sealing. Some embodiments do not rely on material thickness as a major factor for sealing strength, but instead or in addition use the shape of the press-fit elements to create enhanced leak-resistance.
In one or more embodiments of the invention the front edge of the enclosure may be longer than the back edge. For example, a container may be roughly trapezoidal in shape with the front edge longer than the back edge. Such embodiments may provide a benefit of a larger opening area for the insertion and removal of materials. This benefit may be particularly valuable when the press-fit elements of the seal utilize thick material, since the opening may pinch together at the left and right edges.
In one or more embodiments, the top press-fit element and the bottom press-fit element have one or more male or female elements that mate together to form part of the seal. Different embodiments may employ any convenient shapes, sizes, and numbers for these male and female elements. In some embodiments either the top press-fit element or the bottom press-fit element, or both, may have a vertical protrusion extending upward or downward into a corresponding cavity on the other press-fit element. In some embodiments one or more of the vertical protrusions may have one or more horizontal ridges emerging horizontally from the vertical protrusion. These ridges may be implemented to lock into place into corresponding indentations on the opposite press-fit element. Some embodiment use at least two horizontal ridges attached to a single vertical protrusion, spaced out vertically at different heights, to provide additional sealing force. Other embodiments may use only a single horizontal ridge, or no horizontal ridges. The shapes and sizes of the vertical protrusion and the horizontal ridges, if present, may differ across embodiments. For example, horizontal ridges may be triangular, circular, elliptical, square, rectangular, or any other shape extending horizontally from a vertical protrusion. In some embodiments a vertical protrusion may be at least 0.2 cm, e.g., 80%, or any other percentage of the overall thickness of the upper and lower press-fit elements, in other embodiments, any value between 0.4 cm and 0.6 and in other embodiments 0.8 cm tall. In some embodiments a horizontal ridge may be at least 0.1 cm wide or any other width, including any value greater than 0.1 cm, such as 0.2 cm or wider.
To achieve a leak resistant seal, one or more embodiments of the invention may incorporate press-fit elements of substantial size and material thickness. Such designs present a potential challenge in that the sealing elements may extend a considerable distance away from the top and bottom enclosures. To mitigate this effect, one or more embodiments of the invention may offset the top and bottom press-fit elements so that they are more centered along the horizontal plane of the container. In particular, in one or more embodiments, the top press-fit element or the bottom press-fit element, or both, may have cavities and protrusions that extend both above and below the center horizontal plane between the top and bottom enclosures. For example, a bottom press-fit element might have cavities below the center horizontal plane, and a vertical protrusion that extends above the center horizontal plane. Thus, one or more embodiments enable containers with leak resistant seals that have sealing elements better aligned or centered with the sides of the containers' enclosures. Furthermore, thicker seals provide a tactile area in which to hold the container while minimizing the chance of dropping the container. Thus the seal is configured as a handle to hold the container in one or more embodiments when the seal is thick enough based on the coefficient of static friction and based on the shape of the seal in order to hold the desired contents securely.
In some embodiments of the invention the top and bottom press-fit elements may extend to portions of the left edge or right edge of the top and bottom enclosures. In such embodiments the opening mechanism for the container may incorporate a hinged area or similar design along the sides that allows the container to open wider than if it can only open on the front edge. Such embodiments may provide considerable convenience by making it easier for a user to insert items into the container or remove items from the container.
One or more embodiments of the invention may provide flaps or tabs extending from the front edge or the sides of the top and bottom press-fit elements. Such flaps or tabs may be used to hold the edges of the container in order to pull it open from its sealed position. These flaps may be of any convenient size or shape, and may be placed in any convenient location. In some embodiments for example, the flaps may be shaped roughly as an arc with the widest portion in the center of the front edge. In other embodiments the flaps may consist of simple tabs emerging from the center of the front edge or from other locations. In some embodiments there may be a bottom tab and a top tab, with the bottom tab longer than the top tab. Other embodiments may reverse this arrangement and may have a top tab that is longer than the bottom tab. In other embodiments the flaps or tabs may be of equal size. A longer flap or tab may provide a lever arm for the user when pulling the seal open, allowing the user to more easily open the seal. This feature may be particularly valuable for a very strong seal that is designed for leak resistance, since the user must have a mechanism to overcome the sealing force when opening the container. In one or more embodiments there may be a gap between the top flap and the bottom flap to make it easier for the user to grasp one or both of the flaps for opening.
In one or more embodiments the top or bottom press-fit element may incorporate a vertical protrusion surrounded by two cavities, one forward of the protrusion and one backward from the protrusion. In some embodiments the depths of these two cavities may be unequal. For example, in one or more embodiments a forward cavity may be shallower than a back cavity. A potential advantage of such an asymmetric shape for the press-fit element is that the force required to begin opening the seal from the forward edge may be less than the sealing force towards the back edge. This may facilitate opening by the user while maintaining a strong seal. Once the user has broken the seal at the forward cavity, the additional lever arm provided by the open portion of the press-fit element may be used to continuing opening the back part of the seal.
Embodiments of the invention may incorporate various shapes and sizes for the press-fit elements. In some embodiments the shape of the boundary between the top press-fit element and the bottom press-fit element may contribute significantly to the sealing force. Embodiments may use winding paths for the boundary with multiple changes of direction to improve the seal. Such winding paths provide two potential advantages. First, they can provide resistance to movement of the press-fit elements in multiple directions. Secondly, they can lengthen the distance that liquid must travel to escape from the seal, improving leak resistance. The direction of resistance to movement is quantified by the direction of the normal vector to the boundary surface. In some embodiments a boundary path may provide normal vectors that point in four different directions, including up, down, forward, and backward. Some embodiments may provide more or fewer normal vectors. The normal vectors are orthogonal to the surface whether planar or curved at a particular point along the plane or curve. In some embodiments the normal vectors to the boundary surface may point approximately in these four directions, but may point somewhere in all four quadrants of the vertical plane perpendicular to the back-to-front axis of the container. With normal vectors in all quadrants, the press-fit elements provide sealing forces in all directions. In other embodiments the winding path of the boundary may change directions multiple times to provide multiple normal vectors in all directions on different segments of the boundary path. For example, in one or more embodiments there may be at least three different segments of the boundary path with normal vectors in each of the four directions or four quadrants. Such paths further increase the sealing force.
In one or more embodiments the winding path of the press-fit boundary will be significantly longer than the straight-line back-to-front horizontal distance across the press-fit elements. This longer path improves the sealing by lengthening the path for liquids to travel out of the seal. For example, in some embodiments the length of the boundary path is at least twice as long as the horizontal back-to-front distance between the start and end of the boundary path. Other embodiments may utilize even longer boundary paths with greater distance ratios.
The above and other aspects, features and advantages of the ideas conveyed through this disclosure will be more apparent from the following more particular description thereof, presented in conjunction with the following drawings wherein:
A shaped elastomeric container with an integrated leak resistant seal will now be described. In the following exemplary description numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the ideas described throughout this specification. It will be apparent, however, to an artisan of ordinary skill that embodiments of ideas described herein may be practiced without incorporating all aspects of the specific details described herein. In other instances, specific aspects well known to those of ordinary skill in the art have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the disclosure. Readers should note that although examples of the innovative concepts are set forth throughout this disclosure, the claims, and the full scope of any equivalents, are what define the invention.
In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, the shapes and dimensions of the press-fit elements may also contribute significantly to the leak resistance of the seal.
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
The vertical protrusion 601 in
Embodiments of the invention provide opposing surfaces of the top press-fit element and the bottom press-fit element to resist forces in multiple directions. These opposing surfaces in multiple directions contribute to the strength of the seal and the resistance of the seal to leaks. In one or more embodiments, opposing forces between the top and bottom press-fit elements exist in each of the four directions up, down, forward and backward (when viewed from a side view). In some embodiments the directions of opposing forces exist in all four quadrants of the plane perpendicular to the front edge, but may not be precisely along the vertical and horizontal axes. Such embodiments effectively provide opposing forces in all four directions since the vector sum of the actual forces includes components in the positive and negative vertical and horizontal directions.
In one or more embodiments, multiple segments of the common boundary provide resistance to forces in each direction. With multiple segments providing force resistance in various directions, the strength of the seal may be further increased.
The directions of the opposing forces between the top press-fit element and the bottom press-fit element are represented by the normal vectors to the common press-fit boundary between the top and bottom press-fit elements.
One or more embodiments of the invention provide leak resistance in part by utilizing a winding path for the boundary between the top press-fit element and the bottom press-fit element. When the seal is closed, liquids flowing through gaps in the seal must traverse this entire winding path. Such a gap is shown at gap 819 having horizontal width G1 between first boundary of contact having horizontal width B1, starting at contact point 820 when traversing the seal from left to right up to contact point 821 (where the gap begins) and second boundary of contact having horizontal width B2, starting at contact point 822 (where the gap ends) when traversing the seal from left to right up to contact point 823. Hence a longer and more tortuous path increases the leak resistance of the seal. Different embodiments may employ various shapes for such a winding path.
Some embodiments of the invention utilize multiple techniques to enhance the leak resistance of the seal. For example, the embodiment shown in
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the press-fit elements of the seal may extend to portions of the left edge or the right edge, or both, of the top and bottom enclosures.
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the container may include a top flap or a bottom flap, or both, proximal to the opening. These flaps may be used for example for grasping the edges of the container when opening or closing the container.
While the ideas herein disclosed have been described by means of specific embodiments and applications thereof, numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention set forth in the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2121988 | Salfisberg | Jun 1938 | A |
2500363 | Koeppel | Mar 1950 | A |
2613421 | Madsen | Oct 1952 | A |
2637085 | Madsen | May 1953 | A |
2674289 | Silverman | Apr 1954 | A |
2777181 | Morner | Jan 1957 | A |
2780261 | Svec et al. | Feb 1957 | A |
3115689 | Jacobs | Dec 1963 | A |
3149747 | Burgess | Sep 1964 | A |
3280870 | Bundy | Oct 1966 | A |
3338285 | Jaster et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3808649 | Ausnit | May 1974 | A |
4159728 | Kraus et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4199845 | Ausnit | Apr 1980 | A |
4397404 | Blanchette | Aug 1983 | A |
4512474 | Harding | Apr 1985 | A |
4736496 | Fisher et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4842670 | Callis et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4845781 | Strickland et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4929487 | Tilman et al. | May 1990 | A |
5031768 | Fischer | Jul 1991 | A |
5046659 | Warburton | Sep 1991 | A |
5067208 | Herrington et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5161286 | Herrington et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5235731 | Anzai et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5351369 | Swain | Oct 1994 | A |
5577305 | Johnson | Nov 1996 | A |
5584408 | Orkisz | Dec 1996 | A |
5665301 | Alanko | Sep 1997 | A |
5686304 | Codner | Nov 1997 | A |
5709915 | Tomic et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5729876 | Johnson | Mar 1998 | A |
5802677 | Dorman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6420037 | Tsuji et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6625955 | Aylward | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632164 | Warburton-Pitt | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6761481 | Bois | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7291370 | Gipson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316052 | Pawloski et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7585111 | Turvey et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7681732 | Moehlenbrock et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7891514 | Walsh et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7904996 | Dobreski et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8157123 | Tucker et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
9156593 | Schreiter et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9371153 | Nouri et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
20040144781 | Dees et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050247709 | Atkins et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060000076 | Hayes | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060034551 | Linneweil | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060083833 | Pezzana et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060289550 | Guardigli | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070095848 | Galland et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070183692 | Pawloski | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080118609 | Harlfinger | May 2008 | A1 |
20090110335 | LeBoeuf | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134179 | Kidd et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090134180 | Kidd et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090223966 | Kidd et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100218690 | Huber et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110038564 | Slansky | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110103717 | Kasai | May 2011 | A1 |
20120008880 | Toth | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120037618 | Perez | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120106874 | Pawloski | May 2012 | A1 |
20120152943 | Leoncavallo et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130091667 | Zerfas | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130105352 | Munguia | May 2013 | A1 |
20140270579 | Nouri | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270587 | Schreiter et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150232234 | Plourde | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150367987 | Clark | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160031609 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1238598 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0958909 | Nov 1999 | EP |
2302247 | Sep 1976 | FR |
1549021 | Aug 1979 | GB |
1981147909 | Nov 1981 | JP |
H08217093 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2001031138 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2008056279 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2010168098 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2015016018 | Jan 2015 | JP |
2014163712 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report Received in PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US16/20279, dated Mar. 1, 2016, 12 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9371153 (IPR2018-01216), 89 pages. |
Declaration of Paul Koch, Ph.D. In Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 136 pages and Curriculum Vitae in Support thereof. |
Rehak, Melanie, “Who Made that Ziploc Bag”, The New York Times Magazine dated Jul. 25, 2014. |
“Handbook of molded and extruded rubber”, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Akron (1949), retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015002005448. |
Correspondence from Robert F. Kramer of Dentons US LLP to Mr. R. William Beard, Jr. of Slayden Grubert Beard PLLC, dated Apr. 9, 2018 in re Stasher, Inc.—Zip Top LLC, 5 pages. |
Correspondence from R. William Beard, Jr. of Slayden Grubert Beard PLLC to Danna J. Cotman, Esq. of ARC IP Law, PC dated Mar. 16, 2018 in re “Stasher Patents”, 16 pages. |
Correspondence from Danna J. Cotman of ARC IP Law, PC to Rebecca Finell, dated Mar. 9, 2018 in re “Notification of Intellectual Property Rights”, 2 pages. |
“Stasher Monthly Gross Sales” for the years 2016 through 2018, 2 pages. |
Correspondence from reddot design award to Stasher, Inc. in re “Your Success in the Red Dot Award: Product Design 2016”, Mar. 2016, 3 pages. |
“Global Innovation Awards” 2016 Winner Plaque (1 page) and Photograph of plaque being presented (1 page). |
Original Complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division in Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-00276 (Zip Top, LLC and Finell Co., LLC v. Blue Avocado Co.) on Apr. 2, 2018, 30 pages. |
“Zip Top Containers” retrieved from https://vimeo.com/259047617 (3 pages). |
“Elastomer: chemical compound”, Encyclopedia Britannica, retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150704001810/https://www.britannica.com/science/elastomer (5 pages). |
Shark Tank Season 9 Episode 15—Stasher Segment (24 pages) and Segment Offset Summary (1 page); Undated. |
“IHA Announces Finalists for Global Innovation Awards for Product Design”, Press Release International Housewares Association, Feb. 17, 2016, 4 pages. |
S9 E15 Episode 15, ABC Episode Summary, retrieved from https://abc.go.com/shows/shark-tank/episode-guide/season-09/15-episode-15 (2 pages). |
The American Heritage College Dictionary, Third Edition, 1997 (8 pages). |
Declaration of Katousha Nouri in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response to Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 56 pages. |
Declaration Robert M. Kimmel in Support of Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 56 pages. |
Declaration of Katousha Nouri in Support of Patent Owner Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 7 pages. |
Declaration of Katousha Nouri in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 6 pages. |
Declaration of Paul Maguire in Support of Patent Owner Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 17 pages. |
Declaration of Robert M. Kimmel in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 6 pages. |
Declaration of Haley Haggerstone in Support of Patent Owner Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 5 pages. |
Declaration of Toby Thomas in Support of Patent Owner Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 88 pages. |
“Pre-Order Zip Tops on Kickstarter”, newsletter dated Oct. 1, 2018 (2 pages). |
Internal Stasher, Inc. Email Correspondence in re “½ gallon price competition on Amazon” dated Jun. 15, 2018 through Jul. 9, 2018, 26 pages. |
“Ziploc Brand Freezer Bags” Product Listing retrieved from www.watsinsidescjohnson.com/us/en/brands/ziploc/ziploc-brand-freezer-bags, 2 pages. |
Email Correspondnece from Susan Cassar of Wacker Chemical Corporation in re: “Stress/strain curve legend”, dated Apr. 10, 2019, 1 page. |
Patent Owner Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 80 pages. |
Supplemental Patent Owner Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 9 pages. |
Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review, (IPR2018-01216), 39 pages. |
Patent Owner Response for Inter Partes Review (IPR2018-01216), 84 pages. |
“National Certification in Plastics Study Guide”, The Society of the Plastics Industry (SPI), Inc., published by Hanser Publishers, Munich (2000), 5 pages. |
“Guide to Plastics Property and Specification Charts”, by the Editors of Modern Plastics Encyclopedia (1974) 8 pages. |
Polymer Data Handbook by Oxford University Press, Inc. (1999), 1102 pages. |
Bhowmick, Anil, “Mechanical Properties of Polymers”, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, 16 pages. |
Meltzer, et al., “The Influence of Fillers and Degree of Vulcanization on the Mechanical Properties of Hard Rubber Polyblends”, vol. 8 pp. 773-789 (1964). |
Wang, et al., “Influence of Prolonging Vulcanization on the Structure and Properties of Hard Rubber”, The University of South Australia (2007) 11 pages. |
Rosato, Dominick, “Rosato's Plastics Encyclopedia and Dictionary”, Hanser Publishers (1993) 8 pages. |
Soroka, Walter, “Illustrated Glossary of Packaging Terminology” (2008) 5 pages. |
Billmeyer, Fred, “Textbook of Polymer Science”, Interscience Publishers (1962), 4 pages. |
Whittington, Lloyd, “Whittington's Dictionary of Plastics”, Technomic Publishing Co. (1978), 5 pages. |
Stasher Website Acclaim, 16 pages, Undated. |
Oral Deposition of Paul Edward Koch, dated Apr. 11, 2019 conducted in Case No. IPR2018-01216 (91 pages). |
Hamilton, James, “An Overview of Silicone Rubber”, published Jun. 1, 2003 (7 pages). |
“Standard Terminology Relating to Plastics”, ASTM International (2019), retrieved Apr. 9, 2019, 17 pages. |
International Standard 1382 Rubber Vocabulary, retrieved Apr. 15, 2019, 132 pages. |
Original Schematic re “Tortous Path”. |
Stasher Seal Cross Section, Undated, 1 Page. |
Stasher, Inc. listing of Accolades, Undated, 3 Pages. |
“U.S. Population: How many plastic freezer, sandwich or storage bags have you used in the last 7 days”, Statista (2018 Data), 2 pages. |
Parker, Laura, “Fast Facts about Plastic Pollution”, National. Geographic, Dec. 20, 2018, 10 pages. |
“Excellence in Housewares Awards 2018” program for event held in Royal Lancaster London on Oct. 3, 2018, 2 pages. |
“Thirteen Companies Honored with IHA Global Innovation Awards for Product Design”, International Housewares Association, dated Mar. 3, 2019, 2 pages and photograph of plaque presentation (1 page). |
“About the International Housewares Association—IHA”, https://www.housewares.org/iha/default. |
“2019 IHA Global Innovation Award Global Honorees and Finalists”, Undated, 8 pages. |
LyondellBasell Petrothene NA940085 Low Density Polyethylene (Film Grade) Properties Specification, Undated, 4 pages. |
“Easy Zipper Audit”, Undated, 1 page. |
“Zip Top Containers are all you need” Undated, 1 page. |
“Keep America Beautiful”, Wikipedia.org, Undated, 6 pages. |
“Frequently Asked Questions” retrieved https://ziptop.co/apps/help-center#!im-a-blogger-can-i-get-a-sample-to-review, retrieved Mar. 9, 2018, 3 pages. |
“Red Dot”, Wikipdia.org, retrieved from https://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/red_dot, undated, 3 pages. |
Baron, Abigail, et al., “The 7 most brilliant product designs of 2016”, Inc. Magazine, Undated, 9 pages. |
Hill, Danielle, “What are Ziploc Brand Bags Made of”, Leaf Group Ltd, Undated, 6 pages. |
“A Hard Character”, Wacker Chemie AG, retrieved Apr. 2, 2019, 4 pages. |
“Hardly any Strain Under Stress” Diagram, Undated, 1 page. |
“Standard Terminology Relating to Rubber”, ASTM Intl., Retrieved on Apr. 2, 2019, 17 pages. |
“Overview of Materials for Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Copolymer, Film Grade”, MatWeb Material Property Data, retrieved from http://www.matweb.com/search/datasheetText.aspx?bassnum=O4107 on Apr. 6, 2019, 2 pages. |
Die 299 45% HDPE (.103 Width) Track Specifications, Dated Jul. 26, 1999, 2 pages. |
Die 324 (2044-2001) Bolthouse Carrot Tamper Evident Specifications, Dated Jul. 14, 1999, 1 page. |
Judgment Terminating the Proceeding issued in Case IPR2018-01216 (4 pages). |
Consolidated Markman Briefing filed in Civil Action No. 6:18-cv-312 on May 14, 2019, 147 pages. |
Declaration of Toby Thomas in Support of Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief (Civil No. 6:18-cv-312), filed May 14, 2019, 13 pages. |
Declaration of Robert Kimmel in Support of Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief (Civil No. 6:18-cv-312), filed May 14, 2019, 27 pages, and Curriculum Vitae in Support thereof (9 pages). |
Declaration of Paul Koch in Regarding Claim Construction Issues (Civil No. 6:18-cv-312), filed May 14, 2019, 11 pages. |
“The Compact Oxford English Dictionary—2nd Edition”, Clarendon Press—Oxford; 5 pages. |
“Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary”, Merriam-Webster, Inc. (1988), 4 pages. |
Joint Claim Construction Statement filed in Civil Action No. 6:18-cv-312, on May 14, 2019, 6 pages. |
Claim Construction Order filed in Civil Action No. 6:18-cv-312, on Jun. 19, 2019, 10 pages. |
Initial Claim Construction Order filed in Civil Action No. 6:18-cv-312, on Jun. 7, 2019, 3 pages. |
First Amended Answer and Counterclaims, filed in Civil Action No. 6:18-cv-312, on May 27, 2019, 17 pages. |
“Copycat 2” undated images, 4 pages. |
“Copycat 3” images of samples purchased Mar. 2019, 6 pages. |
“Copycat 4”, retrieved from alibaba.com, Undated, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Received in PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US16/20279, Sep. 14, 2017, 10 pages. |
Extended Search Report issued in EP16759364.9, dated Sep. 26, 2018, 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in JP2017-546909, dated Jan. 29, 2020 (7 pages), and corresponding English Translation (6 pages). |
Examination Report issued in AU2016226375, dated Feb. 4, 2020, 4 pages. |
Response to Examination Report dated Apr. 17, 2020 (22 pages). |
Annex A: Commercial embodiments of Munguia, 3 pages, Undated. |
Engineers Edge, Coefficient of friction values for various materials, retrieved from https://www.engineersedge.com/coefficients_of_friction.htm on Apr. 17, 2020 (4 pages). |
Professional Plastics, Coefficient of friction for a large number of different types of plastics, undated (4 pages). |
Annex G: Granted Canadian Claims (CA2999323/ Jan. 17, 2020) based off PCT/US2016/020279. |
Annex H: Granted Chinese Claims (English Translation) (2020). |
Annex I: Applicant's commercial product discussed in view of the current claims, undated (5 pages). |
Communication pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC issued in EP16759364.9, dated Oct. 12, 2018 (1 page), and response thereto dated Apr. 18, 2019 (3 pages). |
Examination Report (Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC) issued in EP16759364.9, dated Jun. 17, 2019 (5 pages), and response thereto dated Oct. 14, 2019 (8 pages). |
Examination Report (Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC) issued in EP16759364.9, dated Nov. 26, 2019 (4 pages); and response thereto (22 pages), including claims (original and marked-up); Annex 1 (5 pages). |
Annex A to Examination Report Response in EP16759364.9, “Example 1: Redrocket Silicone Food Storage Bag” at https://tinyurl.com/s225yz6. (3 pages). |
“Coefficient of Friction Equation and Table Chart—Engineers Edge”, webpage retrieved from www.engineersedge.com/coefficients_of_friction.htm; retrieved on Apr. 17, 2020 (4 pages). |
“Mechanical Properties of Plastic Materials”, published by Professional Plastics, Printed Apr. 17, 2020 (4 pages). |
Examination Report (Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC) issued in EP16759364.9, dated Jun. 24, 2020 (4 pages). |
Office Action Input and Amended Claims filed in response to Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2020 issued in JP2017-546909, and English Translation. |
Office Action issued in KR 10-2017-7028124, dated Jun. 25, 2020 (10 pages) and English Translation thereof (10 pages). |
Office Action filed in KR 10-2017-7028124, dated Aug. 25, 2020 (14 pages), Claim Amendments and English Translation thereof. |
Examination Report Response filed in AU2016226375, dated Sep. 2, 2020, 29 pages, and Statement of Proposed Amendments (20 pages). |
Notice of Allowance received in AU2016226375, dated Oct. 2, 2020 (4 pages). |
Office Action issued in CA2999323, dated Jan. 24, 2020 (4 pages). |
Office Action Response filed in CA2999323, dated Feb. 18, 2020 (39 pages). |
Notice of Allowance issued in CA2999323, dated Apr. 1, 2020 (1 page). |
Certificate of Patent issued in CA2999323, dated Jun. 9, 2020 (49 pages). |
International Search Report Received in PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US14/00032, dated Jul. 30, 2014, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14639065 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 16590281 | US |