Shaped microperforated polymeric film sound absorbers and methods of manufacturing the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6598701
  • Patent Number
    6,598,701
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 30, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 29, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
Shaped, microperforated sound absorbers and methods of making the same are herein provided. In one embodiment, the sound absorber is produced from a polymeric, typically plastic, film having a series of microperforations formed over all or a portion of the film surface. The film is then formed to produce the desired three-dimensional shape. The depth of the three-dimensional shape is controlled to provide the desired cavity depth which, in turn, influences the sound absorption spectrum. After forming, the three-dimensional shape is maintained without the need for additional supports or frames. Deformation of the microperforations due to the forming process does not substantially interfere with the sound absorption properties of the film. Further, film resonance over largely unsupported portions also has little effect on the sound absorption spectrum.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to sound absorption systems and, more particularly, to both three-dimensionally-shaped, microperforated polymeric sound absorbers and methods of manufacturing the same.




BACKGROUND




Sound absorbers are in widespread use in a number of different applications. While various configurations are known, one common sound absorber design utilizes one or more layers of fibrous material to dissipate sound wave energy. Such fiber-based absorbers may include, for example, fiberglass strands, open-cell polymeric foams, fibrous spray-on materials such as polyurethanes, and acoustic tiles (agglomerated fibrous and/or particulate matter). These materials permit the frictional dissipation of sound energy within the interstitial voids of the sound absorbing material. While such fiber-based absorbers are advantageous in that they are effective over a broad acoustic spectrum, they have inherent disadvantages. For instance, these sound absorbers can release particulate matter, degrading the surrounding air quality. In addition, some fiber-based sound absorbers do not possess sufficient resistance to heat or fire. They are therefore often limited in application or, alternatively, must undergo additional and sometimes costly treatment to provide desirable heat/flame resistance.




Another type of sound absorber utilizes perforated sheets, such as relatively thick metal having perforations of large diameter. These sheets may be used alone with a reflective surface to provide narrow band sound absorption for relatively tonal sounds. Alternatively, these perforated sheets may be used as a facing overlying a fibrous sound absorber to improve sound absorption over a wider acoustic spectrum. In addition to their own absorbing properties, the perforated sheets also serve to protect the fiber-material. However, these “two-piece” sound absorbers are limited in application due to their cost and relative complexity.




Perforated, sheet-based sound absorbers have also been suggested for sound absorption. Conventional perforated, sheet-based sound absorbers may use either relatively thick (e.g., greater than 2 mm) and stiff perforated sheets of metal or glass or thinner perforated sheets which are externally supported or stiffened with reinforcing strips to eliminate vibration of the sheet when subject to incident sound waves.




Fuchs (U.S. Pat. No. 5,700,527), for example, te aches a sound absorber using relatively thick and stiff perforated sheets of 2-20 mm thick glass or synthetic glass. Fuchs suggests using thinner sheets (e.g., 0.2 mm thick) of relatively stiff synthetic glass provided that the sheets are reinforced with thickening or glued-on strips in such a manner that incident sound cannot cause the sheets to vibrate. In this case, the thin, reinforced sheet is positioned away from an underlying reflective surface.




Mnich (U.S. Pat. No. 5,653,386) teaches a method of repairing sound attenuation structures for aircraft engines. The sound attenuation structures commonly include an aluminum honeycomb core having an imperforate backing sheet adhered to one side, a perforate sheet of aluminum adhered to the other side, and a porous wire cloth adhesively bonded to the perforated aluminum sheet. According to Mnich, the sound attenuation structure may be repaired by removing a damaged portion of the wire cloth and adhesively bonding a microperforated plastic sheet to the underlying perforated aluminum sheet. In this manner, the microperforated plastic sheet is externally supported by the perforated aluminum sheet to form a composite, laminated structure which provides similar sound absorption as the original wire cloth/perforated sheet laminated structure.




While these perforated and microperforated sheet-based sound absorbers may overcome some of the inherent disadvantages of their fiber-based counterparts, they are expensive and/or of limited use. For instance, very thick and/or very stiff sound absorbers or those which require external support e.g., thickening strips, are costly and complex when compared to fiber-based sound absorbers.




Another problem inherent with fiber-based and conventional perforated sound absorbers involves applications in non-planar configurations, i.e., applications that require sound absorbers having three-dimensional rather than planar shapes. In particular, fiber-based sound absorbers generally require external support to maintain such non-planar, three-dimensional configurations. Perforated sheet-based sound absorbers, on the other hand, are heavy and typically require expensive forming equipment to produce three-dimensional shapes.




Yet another drawback with conventional, perforated sound absorbers is that the perforated sheet may require expensive, narrow diameter perforations for applications involving other than absorption of tonal sound. For instance, to achieve broad-band sound absorption, conventional perforated sheets must be provided with perforations having high aspect ratios (hole depth to hole diameter ratios). However, known punching, stamping, and laser drilling techniques used to form such small hole diameters are relatively expensive.




SUMMARY




Accordingly, the present invention provides a shaped, broad-band sound absorber that is inexpensive to produce, yet applicable across a wide range of applications. More particularly, the present invention provides polymeric film sound absorbers having non-planar, three-dimensional shapes and methods of producing such sound absorbers.




A sound absorbing body in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention includes a polymeric film having first and second major surfaces and a plurality of microperforations extending between the first and second major surfaces. A three-dimensional shape is formed by the polymeric film. The three-dimensional shape has an interior surface and an exterior surface wherein the interior surface defines a volume.




In another embodiment, a sound absorbing body is provided including a polymeric film having first and second major surfaces and a plurality of microperforations extending between the first and second major surfaces. A three-dimensional shape formed by the polymeric film is also provided. The three-dimensional shape includes an interior surface and an exterior surface, wherein the interior surface defines a volume of the three-dimensional shape. In response to incident soundwaves at a particular frequency in the audible frequency spectrum, the sound absorbing body absorbs at least a portion of the incident soundwaves. At least a portion of the three-dimensional shape may vibrate in response to the incident soundwaves.




In yet another embodiment, a sound absorbing body is provided having a polymeric film with first and second major surfaces. The body further includes a plurality of microperforations extending between the first and second major surfaces of the polymeric film, and a three-dimensional shape formed by the polymeric film. The three-dimensional shape includes an interior surface and an exterior surface, wherein the interior surface defines a volume of the three-dimensional shape. A fibrous sound absorbing material proximate the polymeric film is also included.




In still yet another embodiment of the invention, a method of manufacturing a sound absorbing body is provided. The method includes providing a sheet of polymeric film having first and second major surfaces, wherein the polymeric film has a plurality of microperforations extending between the first and second major surfaces. The method further includes deforming the sheet to form a three-dimensional shape where the three-dimensional shape includes an interior surface and an exterior surface, the interior surface defining a volume of the three-dimensional shape.











Although briefly summarized here, the invention can best be understood by reference to the drawings and the description of the embodiments which follow.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The invention will be further described with reference to the drawings wherein like reference characters indicate like parts throughout the several views, and wherein:





FIG. 1

is perspective view of a sound absorbing system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 2

is a cross-section view taken along line


2





2


of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a perforation configuration in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 4

is a perforation configuration in accordance with another embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 5

is a perforation configuration in accordance with yet another embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 6

is a perforation configuration in accordance with still yet another embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 7

is a representative normal incidence sound absorption spectrum for a three-dimensional microperforated film sound absorber in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 8

is a diagrammatic representation of a method used to produce a microperforated plastic film;





FIGS. 9A-9D

are diagrammatic views illustrating a method of producing a three-dimensional sound absorber in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;





FIGS. 10A-10F

illustrate sound absorbers in accordance with other embodiments of the invention; and





FIG. 11

illustrates exemplary sound absorption spectrums for sound absorbers in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS




In the following detailed description of the embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.




Generally speaking, the present invention is directed to microperforated, polymeric films that are formed into three-dimensional shapes for use as sound absorbers. The three-dimensional shape is achieved and maintained without the need for external supports or supplemental shaping elements.




The sound absorbers of the present invention are intended for a wide range of acoustic applications such as, for example, automobile door panels and the like, and household appliances such as washing machines, for example. However, the ability to produce a wide array of three-dimensional shapes makes absorbers and methods of the present invention adaptable to most any sound absorbing application.





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a sound absorbing system


50


including a sound absorbing body


100


and a sound reflecting surface


200


. The sound absorbing body


100


, in one embodiment, may be formed from a single continuous sheet of microperforated, polymeric film


102


that is molded or otherwise formed to produce a three-dimensional shape


104


. The three-dimensional shape


104


may be defined by one or more exterior surfaces


106


and one or more interior surfaces


108


(see FIG.


2


). While the three-dimensional shape


104


is illustrated in FIG.


1


and described herein as generally box shaped, this is not to be interpreted as limiting as other embodiments having most any shape are possible. Further, the film


102


may be formed into a sound absorbing body


100


comprising a single three-dimensional shape as shown in

FIG. 1

or, alternatively, into numerous three-dimensional shapes of the same or different size. Examples of such alternative embodiments are described in more detail below.





FIG. 2

is a cross section taken along line


2





2


of FIG.


1


. As evident in this view, microperforations


112


(also referred to hereinafter as “holes” or “perforations”) extend through the film


102


from the exterior surface


106


to the interior surface


108


. In this view, the microperforations


112


are shown enlarged for clarity, e.g., they are shown overly large in comparison to the sheet


102


. In practice, actual microperforation size is much smaller and the density much greater than that generally represented in the accompanying figures.




Still referring to

FIG. 2

, the interior surfaces


108


of the sound absorbing body


100


define a cavity or volume


114


. The volume


114


may be further defined and may preferably be enclosed by the reflecting surface


200


. The volume has a depth


116


that is herein generally defined as the distance from the interior surface


108


to the reflective surface


200


. Where the reflecting surface


200


and opposing interior surface


108


are planar and parallel, the depth


116


is constant. However, where one or more of the surfaces


200


and


108


are non-planar or planar but skewed from the other, the depth


116


may vary.




To assist in coupling or otherwise securing the sound absorbing body


100


to the reflecting surface


200


, the three-dimensional shape


104


is preferably formed with coupling portions, e.g., flanges


110


. The flanges


110


may be used to secure the sound absorbing body


100


to the reflecting surface


200


via an adhesive (e.g., two-sided, adhesive tape, epoxy, etc.), ultrasonic weld, or other attachment method. When so secured, a sound absorbing system


50


is formed wherein the volume


114


is preferably enclosed by the sound absorbing body


100


and the reflecting surface


200


. Other embodiments where the volume is not enclosed, i.e., the sound absorbing body


100


does not couple to the reflecting surface


200


, are also possible.




When exposed to acoustic energy waves, “plugs” of air within the microperforations


112


vibrate. As the air vibrates, sound energy is dissipated via frictional interaction of the moving air with the walls of the microperforations


112


. Many factors including the microperforation size, sheet material, sheet thickness, and depth


116


of the volume


114


influence the particular acoustic absorption properties of the sound absorber


100


.




Sound absorbers in accordance with the present invention permit the formation of three-dimensional shapes adapted for use in sound absorbing applications having non-planar reflecting surfaces or, alternatively, in applications where a non-uniform cavity depth


116


is desired (e.g., shaped absorber and planar reflective surface). Further, the formation of the three-dimensional shapes is achieved without the need for reinforcing or thickening strips or other supports.




With this general overview, a discussion of particular aspects of sound absorbers and methods of the present invention is now provided. In particular, preferred microperforated polymeric films and methods for forming the three-dimensional shapes are described.




Microperforated Polymeric Films




In general, the three-dimensional shape


104


(see

FIGS. 1 and 2

) is produced by post-forming a generally planar and continuous polymeric sheet, e.g., film


102


, having microperforations


112


therein. While not central to the present invention, films


102


and methods of producing the films will now be described. For a more detailed discussion, see published PCT Application No. PCT/US99/00987 (international publication number WO 00/05707), filed Jan. 18, 1999, and entitled “Microperforated Polymeric Film for Sound Absorption and Sound Absorber Using Same.”




Referring still to

FIG. 2

, a sound absorbing body


100


(also referred to herein as a “sound absorber”) using a relatively thin and flexible microperforated polymeric film in accordance with one embodiment of the invention is illustrated. The film


102


is typically formed from a solid, continuous polymeric material which is substantially free of any porosity, interstitial spaces, or tortuous-path spaces. The film typically has a bending stiffness of about 10


6


to about 10


7


dyne-cm or less and a thickness less than about 80 mils (2 mm) and more preferably about 30 mils (0.75 mm) or less. The type of polymer as well as the specific physical characteristics (e.g., thickness, bending stiffness, surface density, hole diameter, hole spacing, and hole shape) of the film


102


may vary without departing from the scope of the invention. Preferably, the film


102


has a substantially uniform thickness (before post-forming) with the exception of possible variations in the vicinity of the microperforations that may result from the forming process.




As already stated, a number of factors affect the sound absorption characteristics of the sound absorber


100


. For example, cavity depth


116


(see

FIG. 2

) and properties/geometry of the reflective surface


200


may alter absorption properties. In addition, aspects of the microperforated film


102


including, for example, physical properties of the film material, geometry of the film, the shape of the holes


112


, and the hole spacing


132


may all influence the sound absorption spectrum.




For the frequency range most commonly of interest in sound absorption (roughly 100-10,000 Hz), an average cavity depth


116


of between about 0.25 inches (0.6 cm) and about 6 inches (15.2 cm) is common. However, other cavity depths may be selected in order to broaden the sound absorption spectrum. In addition to varying the cavity depth


116


, the volume


114


(see

FIG. 2

) may also be partitioned into separate compartments or subunits. In still other embodiments, a secondary absorbing element such as a fibrous layer, e.g., layer


1026


of

FIG. 10F

, may be placed adjacent the sound absorber proximate either the exterior surface or the interior surface to further improve the sound absorption spectrum.




Depending on the application, hole spacing or “hole density” preferably ranges from about 100 to about 4,000 holes/square inch, although other densities are certainly possible. The particular hole pattern may be selected as desired. For example, a square array or, alternatively, a staggered array (for example, a hexagonal array) may be used, the latter potentially providing improved tear resistance. In addition to hole density, the actual hole size may also vary depending on the particular application.





FIGS. 3-6

illustrate exemplary perforation configurations according to the present invention. The perforations preferably have a narrowest diameter less than the film thickness


122


(see

FIG. 2

) and typically less than about 20 mils (0.5 mm). The perforation shape and cross-section may also vary. For instance, the cross-section of the perforation may be circular, square, hexagonal and so forth. For non-circular perforations, the term “diameter” is used herein to refer to the diameter of a circle having the equivalent area as the non-circular cross-section. The microperforation embodiments shown in

FIGS. 3-6

are intended to be exemplary, not exhaustive. Accordingly, other configurations are certainly possible without departing from the scope of the invention.





FIG. 3

illustrates one exemplary microperforation


312


having a relatively constant cross-section over its length. In accordance with another embodiment,

FIG. 4

illustrates a microperforation


412


having a varying diameter ranging from a narrowest diameter less than the film thickness


122


to a widest diameter. In still yet another embodiment,

FIG. 5

illustrates a counterbored microperforation


512


.

FIG. 6

illustrates yet another microperforation


600


in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The hole


600


has tapered edges


606


and includes a narrowest diameter


602


(d


n


) less than the film thickness


122


(t


f


) and a widest diameter


604


(d


w


) greater than the narrowest diameter


602


. This provides the hole


600


with an aspect ratio (t


f


:d


n


) greater than one and, if desired, substantially greater than one.




Throughout the figures, various embodiments of the microperforations are shown as tapered (see e.g., reference


112


in

FIG. 2

, reference


600


in FIG.


6


). These embodiments are illustrated and described with the widest diameter, e.g.,


604


in

FIG. 6

, facing outwardly (i.e., away from the reflecting surface). However, other embodiments may utilize microperforations that taper in the opposite direction, i.e., the widest diameter faces inwardly or towards the reflecting surface, without significantly impacting the sound absorption characteristics.




Near the narrowest diameter


602


, tapered edges


606


form a lip


608


. The lip


608


may result from the manufacturing process used to form the microperforation


600


. The lip


608


, in one embodiment, has a length


620


(l) of about 4 mils (0.1 mm) or less and more often about 1 mil (0.02 mm) over which the average diameter is about equal to the narrowest diameter


602


.




The dimensions of the narrowest diameter


602


and widest diameter


604


of the hole


600


can vary, which in turn, affect the slope of the tapered edges


606


. As noted above, the narrowest diameter


602


is typically less than the film thickness


122


and may, for example, be about 50% or less or even about 35% or less of the film thickness. In absolute terms, the narrowest diameter may, for example, be about 20 mils (0.5 mm) or less, about 10 mils (0.25 mm) or less, about 6 mils (0.15 mm) or less and even about 4 mils (0.10 mm) or less, as desired. The widest diameter


604


may be less than, greater than, or equal to the film thickness


122


. In certain embodiments, the widest diameter ranges from about 125% to about 300% of the narrowest diameter


602


.




To appreciate the advantages of a microperforation configuration


600


such as that illustrated in

FIG. 6

, it is helpful to first quantify sound absorption properties. In general, the sound absorption capacity of a sound absorber may be quantified in terms of a sound absorption coefficient α. The sound absorption coefficient α, may be expressed by the relationship:






α(


f


)=1


−A




ref


(


f


)/


A




inc


(


f


)






where A


inc


(f) is the incident amplitude of sound waves at frequency f, and A


ref


(f) is the reflected amplitude of sound waves at frequency f.

FIG. 7

illustrates a representative normal incidence sound absorption spectrum


700


. The spectrum generally includes a peak absorption coefficient (α


p


) at frequency f


p


in a primary peak


702


, a secondary peak


704


, and a nodal frequency f


n


, forming a primary node between the primary and secondary peaks


702


and


704


. At the nodal frequency f


n


, the absorption coefficient a reaches a relative minimum. The quality or performance of the sound absorption spectrum may be characterized using the frequency range f


1


, to f


2


over which the absorption coefficient α meets or exceeds 0.4 and the frequency range f


2


to f


3


between the primary peak


702


and secondary peak


704


over which the absorption coefficient a falls below 0.4. Typically, it is desired to maximize the primary peak breadth ratio f


2


/f


1


(R


p


) and minimize the primary node breadth ratio f


3


/f


2


(R


n


).




Due to the higher frictional damping factors associated with smaller hole sizes, as hole diameter decreases, the quality of the sound absorption spectrum generally increases, i.e., R


p


increases and R


n


decreases. Consequently, with sound absorbers using microperforated sheets, it is desirable to decrease the diameter of the microperforations in order to achieve broad-band sound absorption.




The microperforation


600


of

FIG. 6

provides small diameter holes and small hole length in relatively thick films. The providing of high film thickness relative to effective hole length provides several advantages. For instance, the acoustic performance of a short hole length can be combined with the strength and durability of a thick film. This provides several practical benefits. For example, for a straight-wall hole having a length of about 10 mils (0.25 mm) and a diameter of about 4 mil (0.10 mm), an optimum hole spacing (e.g., α>0.4 and high R


p


) is about 20 mils (0.5 mm). This corresponds to a hole density of about 2500 holes per square inch and to a percentage open area based on narrowest hole diameter of about 3%. Using a tapered hole having a narrowest diameter of about 4 mil (0.10 mm) and a lip of about 1 mil (0.03 mm), a sound absorption spectrum essentially equivalent to the above can be obtained with a hole spacing of about 35 mils (0.9 mm). This corresponds to a hole density of about 800 holes per square inch and a percentage open area of about 1%. Thus, for a given sound absorption performance, the much lower hole density allowed by the use of tapered holes may result in more cost-effective manufacturing. Also, the reduced open area may allow the microperforated film to be more effectively used as a barrier to, for example, liquid water, water vapor, oil, dust and debris, and so forth.




Formation of Microperforations in the Film




Although other methods of producing the microperforations are certainly possible (e.g., laser drilling, punching, etc.), an exemplary method in accordance with the present invention is described below.




Microperforated films in accordance with the present invention may be formed from various materials such as, for instance, polymeric materials. While many types of polymeric materials may be used, e.g., thermoset polymers such as polymers which are cross-linked or vulcanized, a particularly advantageous method of manufacturing a microperforated film utilizes plastic materials.

FIG. 8

illustrates an exemplary process for fabricating a microperforated plastic polymer film for use as a sound absorber. Block


802


represents forming a plastic material. This may include selecting the type of plastic and additives, if any. Suitable plastics include, but are not limited to, polyolefins, polyesters, nylons, polyurethanes, polycarbonates, polysulfones, polypropylenes and polyvinylchlorides for many applications. Copolymers and blends may also be used. The type and amount of additives can vary and are typically selected in consideration of the desired sound absorption properties of the film as well as other characteristics of the film, such as color, printability, adherability, smoke generation resistance, heat/flame retardancy and so forth. Additives may, as discussed above, also be added to a plastic to increase its bending stiffness and surface density.




Block


804


represents contacting the embossable plastic material with a tool having posts which are shaped and arranged to form holes in the plastic material which provide the desired sound absorption properties when used in a sound absorber. Embossable plastic material may be contacted with the tool using a number of different techniques such as, for example, embossing, including extrusion embossing, or compression molding. Embossable plastic material may be in the form of a molten extrudate which is brought in contact with the tooling, or in the form of a pre-formed film which is then heated and placed into contact with the tooling. Typically, the plastic material is first brought to an embossable state by heating the plastic material above its softening point, melting point or polymeric glass transition temperature. The embossable plastic material is then brought in contact with the post tool to which the embossable plastic generally conforms. The post tool typically includes a base surface from which the posts extend. The shape, dimensions, and arrangement of the posts are suitably selected in consideration of the desired properties of the holes to be formed in the material. For example, the posts may have a height corresponding to the desired film thickness and have edges which taper from a widest diameter to a narrowest diameter which is less than, the height of the post in order to provide tapered holes, such as the hole, shown in FIG.


6


.




Block


806


represents solidifying the plastic material to form a solidified plastic film having holes corresponding to the posts. The plastic material typically solidifies while in contact with the post tool. After solidifying, the solidified plastic film is then removed from the post tool as indicated at block


808


. In some instances, the solidified plastic film may be suitable for forming the three-dimensional shapes in accordance with the present invention without further processing. In many instances, however, the solidified plastic film includes a thin skin covering or partially obstructing one or more of the holes. In these cases, as indicated at block


810


, the solidified plastic film typically undergoes treatment to displace the skins.




Skin displacement may be performed using a number of different techniques including, for example, forced air treatment, hot air treatment, flame treatment, corona treatment, or plasma treatment. After skin removal, the film is ready for post-forming into three-dimensional shapes as described herein. The film, in one embodiment, has microperforations over substantially all its surface. In other embodiments, the film has microperforations formed over one or more portions of the film surface corresponding to the desired microperforation location after post-forming.




Three-Dimensional Post-Forming of Microperforated Sound Absorbing Films




The sound absorbing film


102


is formed into the three-dimensional shape


104


(see

FIG. 1

) through post-forming operations. That is, the microperforated film


102


is manufactured as described above or in accordance with other methods and then formed into the desired three-dimensional shape


104


through a forming operation.




Post-forming results in permanent deformation of the microperforated film to produce the self-supporting, three-dimensional shape


104


(see

FIG. 1

) without the need for separate support frames or fixtures. The deformation typically involves thinning of the film and displacing at least one surface of the film from the planar film shape in which it was manufactured.




Post-forming operations may typically, but not necessarily, employ heat to improve the working qualities of the film. The post-forming processes may also employ pressure (positive or vacuum), molds, etc. to further improve the working qualities of the film, as well as to increase the throughput of the process. For example, one typical post-forming method is thermoforming, including the various forms of vacuum or pressure molding/forming, plug molding, etc. Post-forming may also include stretching films or portions/areas of films in planar directions or stretching the films into non-planar or curved shapes.





FIG. 9A

illustrates a film


102


prior to post-forming in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The film


102


includes a first major surface


118


, a second major surface


120


, and a thickness


122


. Microperforations


112


extend through the film


102


as shown.

FIG. 9B

illustrates an exemplary forming mold having surfaces or halves


902


and


904


. When the mold halves are closed (e.g., the half


902


is moved in the direction


906


), the film


102


is clamped therebetween. As a result, the film


102


is molded to form a sound absorbing body


100


(see

FIG. 9C

) having the three-dimensional shape


104


similar to that illustrated in

FIGS. 1 and 2

. A heat source


908


may apply heat to the film


102


prior to molding and/or to the mold halves


902


/


904


during molding to assist in the forming process.




The sound absorbing body


100


, in one embodiment, includes a flange


110


, a first portion


124


, and a second portion


126


as shown in FIG.


9


C. During the forming process, the thickness


128


of the first portion


124


remains substantially equal to the original sheet thickness


122


(See FIG.


9


A). The thickness


129


of the second portion


126


(see FIG.


9


D), on the other hand, is typically reduced during forming. As a result, the thickness of the sheet


102


varies over the three-dimensional shape


104


.




While the deformation of the film


102


is illustrated as forming generally planar sections (see FIG.


9


C), other drawing molds may also be used. For example, the mold could be spherical such that the three-dimensional shape has a spherical or cylindrical component (see e.g., FIG.


10


C).




In another example, the film


102


can be formed to fit and effectively function on most any simple, e.g., regular-shaped, or complex, e.g., irregular-shaped, surface in which it is desired to provide sound absorption. Because most any three-dimensional shape is possible, sound absorbers having relatively complex shapes may be readily produced. In addition, by controlling the cavity depth during forming, the desired sound absorption spectrum may be custom-selected for the particular application.




The deformations illustrated in

FIGS. 9A-9D

can be characterized by the ratio of the thickness


122


(t


o


) in the undeformed portions of the film


102


to the thickness


129


(t


f


) of the deformed portions of the film. Typically, it may be desirable that the ratio t


o


:t


f


be at least about 1.1:1 or greater. In some cases, it is desirable that the ratio t


o


:t


f


be at least about 1.5:1 or greater, more preferably at least about 2:1 or greater.




Thickness variations in the film of post-formed films are, in large part, caused by variations in the strain experienced in different areas of the film during post-forming. In other words, some areas of the post-formed film may experience significant deformation (strain) while other areas may experience little or no deformation during post-forming. Where the film experiences significant deformation, the microperforations


112


(see

FIG. 9D

) may deform. The deformation, if carefully controlled, may not seriously affect the sound absorbing properties of the film. For instance, a model 4110 densometer produced by Gurley Precision Instruments was used to measure the time required to push about 18 cubic inches (300 cubic centimeters) of air through about a 1 square inch (6.5 square centimeter) area of microperforated film. A Gurley parameter of about 0.7 to about 5.0 seconds has been found to correlate with useful sound absorption in a generally flat (i.e., not post-formed) microperforated film, with the preferred range being about 1.0 to about 2.8 seconds. In one test, a generally flat, microperforated film sample produced in a Gurley parameter of about 2.4 to about 2.8 seconds. After being deformed into a three-dimensional shape similar to that shown in

FIG. 10E

, the main surface


1018


of the film exhibited a Gurley parameter of about 1.1 to about 1.2 seconds, still within the preferred range. Accordingly, the slight deformation of the microperforations in this instance had little adverse effect on the film's sound, absorbing capabilities. In fact, this example illustrates that it is possible to select the initial, i.e., undeformed, microperforation size so as to allow for most any expansion which might occur during forming. Additionally, if there are regions of the film in which the holes would be overly-deformed, e.g., in areas of high draw ratios such as surface


1020


in

FIG. 10E

, the microperforation pattern may be selected such that those areas contain few or no microperforations.




Although some specific examples of articles including post-formed films have been described above, it will be understood that post-formed films may be included in any article in which it is desired to take advantage of the unique acoustic and physical properties of such shaped, polymeric films. For example, articles including post-formed films may find use in the automotive industry in door panels, engine compartments, headliners, and similar areas. The articles may also find application in household appliances, e.g., refrigerators, dishwashers, washers, dryers, garbage disposals, HVAC equipment, trash compactors, and the like.





FIGS. 10A-10F

illustrate other exemplary three-dimensional shapes that may be produced in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 10A

illustrates a film


1002


formed to produce multiple shapes


1004


. The shapes may be identical or dissimilar and may be formed on the same or opposite sides as shown.

FIG. 10B

illustrates a film formed to produce two similar or dissimilar planar shapes


1006


and one non-planar, e.g., spherical, shape


1008


.

FIG. 10C

illustrates a single spherical shape


1010


as used with a curved reflecting surface


1012


.

FIG. 10D

illustrates a film forming a cylindrical portion


1014


and a planar portion


1016


.

FIG. 10E

illustrates a three-dimensional shape


1018


having sloped side portions


1020


.

FIG. 10F

illustrates a three-dimensional shape


1022


having inwardly facing flanges


1024


.

FIG. 10F

further illustrates the inclusion of a separate insulating layer


1026


, e.g., a fibrous sound absorbing material, proximate and, in one embodiment, attached to the interior of the three-dimensional shape


1022


. The three-dimensional shape may therefore act as a protective container for the more fragile fibrous material while, at the same time, providing improved sound absorption over absorbers using only fibrous material. The fibrous material


1026


may fill the interior of the three-dimensional shape


1022


partially or completely and may further be configured so as to conform to the three-dimensional shape.




While shown on the interior, other embodiments wherein the fibrous material is located outside the shape


1022


are also possible. Once again, these embodiments are exemplary only and other embodiments are certainly possible without departing from the scope of the invention. For instance, individual elements of the various embodiments described herein may be combined to produce even other sound absorbers.




Attachment to a Reflecting Surface




Referring again to

FIG. 2

, the three-dimensionally shaped, microperforated polymeric film


102


may be disposed near the reflecting surface


200


in a number of different manners. For example, the film


102


may be attached to the structure which forms the reflecting surface


200


. In this case, the film


102


may be attached by its coupling portions, e.g., flanges


110


(see FIG.


2


). The film


102


may alternatively be hung, similar to a drape, from a structure near the reflecting surface


200


. Regardless, the shaped, microperforated film


102


of the present invention is adapted to span relatively large areas without external support.




Exemplary Performance





FIG. 11

illustrates normal incidence sound absorption coefficient spectrums for a microperforated polypropylene film. In the illustrated embodiment, the film has a bending stiffness of about 5.4×10


4


dyne-cm, a film thickness of about 15 mils (0.4 mm), a narrowest diameter of about 4 mils (0.10 mm), a lip length of about 1 mil (0.03 mm) and hole spacing of about 45 mils (1.15 mm). As illustrated in

FIG. 11

, the sound absorption spectrums


1102


-


1110


may vary with cavity depth. Also evident in this figure is a discontinuity or “notch”


1120


in the primary peaks of the absorption spectrums


1102


-


1110


. These notches


1120


may occur due to film vibration (i.e., motion of the film resulting from resonant transfer between film kinetic energy and film potential energy from bending) at the film's fundamental resonant frequency, e.g., about 1 kHz. It is believed that the notches


1120


result from the fact that the film motion subtracts slightly from the motion of the air plugs relative to the walls of the microperforations, thus resulting in a slightly reduced absorption coefficient at that frequency.




Nonetheless,

FIG. 11

clearly demonstrates that, despite the small anomalous notch attributable to film resonance, the microperforated polypropylene films exhibit excellent sound absorption. For example, the spectrums shown in

FIG. 11

have relatively high peak breadth ratios (R


p


). Moreover, film vibration in response to incident sound typically only affects sound absorption in a specific and limited frequency range (e.g., near the film's resonant frequency) and does not detract from sound absorption over the majority of the frequency range of interest. Thus, films in accordance with the present invention provide relatively broad-band sound absorption despite the existence of the notches


1120


.




Thus, while the free spanning portion(s) (i.e., the dimension of the film over which the film is not in contact with an external structure) of the film may vibrate in response to incident sound waves, it has been found that the vibration, if any, fails to significantly impact sound absorption properties. By way of example and not of limitation, suitable free span portions may range from about 100 mils (2.5 mm) on up, with the upper limit being primarily delineated by the surrounding environment.




Conclusion




To provide a more effective sound absorber with minimum degradation of performance, other properties may be altered. For example, film properties such as thickness, bending stiffness, surface density, and loss modulus, as well as boundary conditions such as the extent of the free span can be altered to suit a particular application. It is noted that the relationships between these variables may be complex and interrelated. For example, changing the film thickness may change the bending stiffness as well as the surface density. Accordingly, these variables should be selected taking into account the application and other constraints (for example cost, weight, resistance to environmental conditions, and so on) to arrive at each particular design.




Advantageously, the present invention provides three-dimensionally shaped sound absorbers and methods for forming such sound absorbers. More particularly, the present invention provides for post-forming of sheet-based, microperforated films into most any three-dimensional, self-supporting shape. Accordingly, sound absorbers that conform to non-planar reflecting surfaces or sound absorbers with selectable gaps between the absorber and the reflecting surface can be produced. As discussed above, sound absorbers in accordance with the present invention provide the desired three-dimensional shapes without significantly sacrificing sound absorption properties. This is accomplished even though distortion of the microperforations may occur during post-forming operations.




The complete disclosure of the patents, patent documents, and publications cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety as if each were individually incorporated.




Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described above. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many embodiments are possible within the scope of the invention. Variations, modifications, and combinations of the various parts and assemblies can certainly be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Thus, the invention is limited only by the following claims, and equivalents thereto.



Claims
  • 1. A sound absorbing body comprising:a polymeric film comprising first and second major surfaces; a plurality of microperforations extending between the first and second major surfaces of the polymeric film; and a three-dimensional shape formed by the polymeric film, the three-dimensional shape comprising an interior surface and an exterior surface, wherein the interior surface defines a volume.
  • 2. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein the polymeric film has a bending stiffness of 107 dyne-cm or less.
  • 3. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein the sound absorbing body comprises one or more substantially planar elements.
  • 4. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein the sound absorbing body comprises one or more non-planar elements.
  • 5. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, further comprising a reflecting surface facing the interior surface of the three-dimensional shape, wherein the volume is further defined by the reflecting surface.
  • 6. The sound absorbing body of claim 5, wherein the reflecting surface is substantially planar.
  • 7. The sound absorbing body of claim 5, wherein the reflecting surface is non-planar.
  • 8. The sound absorbing body of claim 5, wherein the sound absorbing body is proximate the reflecting surface.
  • 9. The sound absorbing body of claim 5, wherein the sound absorbing body is attached to the reflecting surface.
  • 10. The sound absorbing body of claim 5, wherein the sound absorbing body is semi-permanently attached to the reflecting surface.
  • 11. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein the thickness of the polymeric film varies over the three-dimensional shape.
  • 12. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein one or more of the plurality of microperforations has a diameter which varies between the first major surface and the second major surface.
  • 13. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein the film has sufficient stiffness to maintain the three-dimensional shape.
  • 14. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein a plurality of three-dimensional shapes are formed in a substantially unitary polymeric film.
  • 15. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein a plurality of substantially uniform three-dimensional shapes are formed in a substantially unitary polymeric film.
  • 16. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein a plurality of different three-dimensional shapes are formed in a substantially unitary polymeric film.
  • 17. The sound absorbing body of claim 16, wherein the plurality of different three-dimensional shapes vary in size.
  • 18. The sound absorbing body of claim 16, wherein the plurality of different three-dimensional shapes vary in shape.
  • 19. The sound absorbing body of claim 16, wherein the plurality of different three-dimensional shapes vary in size and shape.
  • 20. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein at least one of the plurality of microperforations has a narrowest diameter less than a thickness of the polymeric film at its thickest portion.
  • 21. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein a majority of the plurality of microperforations are tapered between the first and second major surfaces of the polymeric film.
  • 22. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein a majority of the plurality of microperforations are tapered between the first and second major surfaces of the polymeric film, and wherein each of the tapered microperforations has a narrowest diameter less than a thickness of the polymeric film at its thickest portion.
  • 23. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein the microperforations comprise a narrowest diameter of about 20 mils or less.
  • 24. The sound absorbing body of claim 1, wherein the plurality of microperforations are arranged in a pattern comprising a density of about 100 to about 4000 per square inch.
  • 25. A sound absorbing body comprising:a polymeric film comprising first and second major surfaces; a plurality of microperforations extending between the first and second major surfaces of the polymeric film; and a three-dimensional shape formed by the polymeric film, the three-dimensional shape comprising an interior surface and an exterior surface, wherein the interior surface defines a volume of the three-dimensional shape, and further wherein, in response to incident soundwaves at a particular frequency in the audible frequency spectrum, the sound absorbing body absorbs at least a portion of the incident soundwaves, and further wherein at least a portion of the three-dimensional shape vibrates in response to the incident soundwaves.
  • 26. The sound absorbing body of claim 25, wherein the particular frequency is a fundamental resonant frequency of the polymeric film with the microperforations formed therein.
  • 27. The sound absorbing body of claim 25, wherein the sound absorbing body has a sound absorption coefficient of 0.4 or greater at the fundamental resonant frequency.
  • 28. The sound absorbing body of claim 25, wherein the three-dimensional shape comprises one or more curvilinear surfaces.
  • 29. The sound absorbing body of claim 25, wherein the three-dimensional shape comprises a smooth, continuous surface.
  • 30. The sound absorbing body of claim 25, wherein the three-dimensional shape comprises one or more planar surfaces.
  • 31. The sound absorbing body of claim 25, wherein the sound absorbing body is proximate a reflecting surface which further defines the volume.
  • 32. The sound absorbing body of claim 31, wherein the three-dimensional shape further comprises coupling portions for coupling the three-dimensional shape to the reflecting surface.
  • 33. The sound absorbing body of claim 25, wherein the plurality of microperforations are formed over substantially all of the three-dimensional shape.
  • 34. The sound absorbing body of claim 25, wherein the plurality of microperforations are formed over a portion of the three-dimensional shape.
  • 35. A sound absorbing body comprising:a polymeric film comprising first and second major surfaces; a plurality of microperforations extending between the first, and second major surfaces of the polymeric film; a three-dimensional shape formed by the polymeric film, the three-dimensional shape comprising an interior surface and an exterior surface, wherein the interior surface defines a volume of the three-dimensional shape; and fibrous sound absorbing material proximate the polymeric film.
  • 36. The sound absorbing body of claim 35, wherein the fibrous sound absorbing material is attached to the polymeric film.
  • 37. The sound absorbing body of claim 35, wherein the fibrous sound absorbing material is located within the volume defined by the interior surface of the three-dimensional shape.
  • 38. The sound absorbing body of claim 35, wherein the fibrous sound absorbing material is coupled to the polymeric film.
  • 39. A method of manufacturing a sound absorbing body comprising:providing a sheet of polymeric film comprising first and second major surfaces, the polymeric film comprising a plurality of microperforations extending between the first and second major surfaces of the polymeric film; and deforming the sheet to form a three-dimensional shape, the three-dimensional shape comprising an interior surface and an exterior surface, wherein the interior surface defines a volume of the three-dimensional shape.
  • 40. The method of claim 39, wherein the deforming comprises heating the sheet of polymeric film.
  • 41. The method of claim 39, wherein the deforming comprises forcing the sheet of polymeric film against a mold surface.
  • 42. The method of claim 39, wherein the deforming comprises heating the sheet of polymeric film and forcing the sheet of polymeric film against a mold surface.
  • 43. The method of claim 39, wherein the deforming comprises heating the sheet of polymeric film and forcing the sheet of polymeric film against a mold surface after heating the sheet.
  • 44. The method of claim 39, wherein the deforming comprises forcing the sheet of polymeric film against a heated mold surface.
  • 45. The method of claim 39, wherein the deforming comprises forming a plurality of the three-dimensional shapes in the sheet of polymeric film.
  • 46. The method of claim 39, further comprising attaching a reflecting surface to the sheet of polymeric film after the deforming, the reflecting surface facing the interior surface of the three-dimensional shape, wherein the volume defined by the interior surface of the three-dimensional shape is further defined by the reflecting surface.
  • 47. The method of claim 46, wherein the reflecting surface is substantially planar.
  • 48. A sound absorbing body comprising:a polymeric film comprising first and second major surfaces; a plurality of microperforations extending between the first and second major surfaces of the polymeric film; and a three-dimensional shape formed by the polymeric film, the three-dimensional shape comprising an interior surface and an exterior surface, wherein the interior surface defines a volume of the three-dimensional shape, and further wherein, in response to incident soundwaves at a particular frequency in the audible frequency spectrum, the sound absorbing body absorbs at least a portion of the incident soundwaves, and further wherein at least a portion of the three-dimensional shape vibrates in response to the incident soundwaves, and still further wherein the sound absorbing body operates to cause a normal incidence sound absorption spectrum to exhibit a notch.
  • 49. The sound absorbing body of claim 48, wherein the particular frequency is a fundamental resonant frequency of the polymeric film with the microperforations formed therein.
  • 50. The sound absorbing body of claim 49, wherein the sound absorbing body has a sound absorption coefficient of 0.4 or greater at the fundamental resonant frequency.
  • 51. The sound absorbing body of claim 48, wherein the three-dimensional shape comprises one or more curvilinear surfaces.
  • 52. The sound absorbing body of claim 48, wherein the three-dimensional shape comprises a smooth, continuous surface.
  • 53. The sound absorbing body of claim 48, wherein the three-dimensional shape comprises one or more planar surfaces.
  • 54. The sound absorbing body of claim 48, wherein the sound absorbing body is proximate a reflecting surface which further defines the volume.
  • 55. The sound absorbing body of claim 54, wherein the three-dimensional shape further comprises coupling portions for coupling the three-dimensional shape to the reflecting surface.
  • 56. The sound absorbing body of claim 48, wherein the plurality of microperforations are formed over substantially all of the three-dimensional shape.
  • 57. The sound absorbing body of claim 48, wherein the plurality of microperforations are formed over a portion of the three-dimensional shape.
US Referenced Citations (24)
Number Name Date Kind
3621934 Thrasher et al. Nov 1971 A
3782495 Nassof Jan 1974 A
3893640 Hult, Jr. et al. Jul 1975 A
4097633 Focht Jun 1978 A
4118531 Hauser Oct 1978 A
4287962 Ingard et al. Sep 1981 A
4755416 Schneider et al. Jul 1988 A
4825974 Hoffmann et al. May 1989 A
5298694 Thompson et al. Mar 1994 A
5459291 Haines et al. Oct 1995 A
5550338 Hielscher Aug 1996 A
5560967 Isaksen Oct 1996 A
5653386 Hennessee et al. Aug 1997 A
5653836 Mnich et al. Aug 1997 A
5657582 Chitwood Aug 1997 A
5700527 Fuchs et al. Dec 1997 A
5741456 Ayrton Apr 1998 A
5807628 Mnich et al. Sep 1998 A
5841081 Thompson et al. Nov 1998 A
5923002 McGrath et al. Jul 1999 A
5962107 Lowery et al. Oct 1999 A
6021612 Dunn et al. Feb 2000 A
6145617 Alts Nov 2000 A
6209680 Perdue Apr 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
43 16 843 Nov 1994 DE
43 34 984 Jan 1995 DE
198 38 766 Feb 2000 DE
0454949 Jun 1991 EP
0 441 759 Aug 1991 EP
0584442 Feb 1994 EP
0 816 583 Apr 2001 EP
WO 0005707 Feb 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Ingard, K. U., “Acoutic visco-thermal effects,” Notes on Sound Absorption Technology, Chapter 2, pp. 2-1 through 2-35 and E-37, copyright 1994 (no month available).
Maa, D.Y., “Microperforated-Panel Wideband Absorbers,” Noise Control Engineering Journal, vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 77-84 (Nov.-Dec., 1987).
Wu, M.Q., “Micro-Perforated Panels for Duct Silencing,” Noise Control Engineering Journal, vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 69-77 (Mar.-Apr., 1997).
Rodriguez, “Principles of Polymer Systems,” 2nd Edition, title page and pp. 373-376.