A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document of the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The present invention relates to connections in application integration systems.
Existing application integration (AI) systems can utilize application views to simplify the way in which adapters are accessed in an enterprise. Application views provide a layer of abstraction between an adapter and any Enterprise Information System (EIS) functions exposed by that adapter. Instead of accessing an EIS by directly programming the EIS, a user can simply edit an application view for the adapter, create a new application view, or delete an obsolete application view. This layer of abstraction, formed by application views, makes it easy for non-programmers to maintain the services and events exposed by the adapter.
Each application view is specific to one adapter and can define a set of business functions on the EIS for that adapter. After an adapter is created, a Web-based interface for that adapter can be used to define application views. Such application views provide a view of the application capabilities exposed by an adapter. An application view can be used to hide as many of the system details from clients as possible. These details can include functionality for doing integration and interacting with enterprise information. The more system level details that are hidden from clients, the greater the chance of changing those details without affecting the clients. This is one reason for using an abstraction layer. If things that may change are abstracted, anything depending on those things may not need to change.
An application view can take advantage of a connection factory. A connection factory is an interface to a pool of connections for an information system. In present AI systems there is a one to one correspondence between application views and connection factories, such that when an application view is defined it is necessary to also define and deploy a connection factory to handle service invocations through a connector for that application view. This requirement of a one-to-one correspondence between application views and resources leads to undesirable definition and deployment repetition, as well as an undesirable consumption of resources.
Systems and methods in accordance with embodiments of the present invention can overcome deficiencies in existing information systems by changing the way in which information system is accessed. A resource adapter can expose certain capabilities in an information system, such as an Enterprise Information System (EIS). An application view that is specific to the resource adapter can be used to allow a user or client application to access the capabilities exposed by the resource adapter. Instead of having a connection factory for each application view, a shareable connection factory can be used to provide a connection between the resource adapter for the application view and the information system. An application-programming interface can be used to provide the functionality that allows the connection factory to be shareable. The shareable connection factory can provide connections to the information system for multiple application views. A user can designate an application view to use a shareable connection factory by referencing the connection factory at application view design time.
Other features, aspects, and objects of the invention can be obtained from a review of the specification, the figures, and the claims.
Systems and methods in accordance with embodiments of the present invention can allow multiple application views to share a common connection factory. One such system is shown in the diagram of
An AI application programming interface (API) can be used to support shared connection factories. Such APIs can contain shareable connection functionality to allow multiple application views to share a connection factory. An application integration system may only make owned connection factories available to a user, but can expose any existing connection factories. These connection factories can be sharable among newly created application views. Owned connection factories can still be created when a user defines a new application view.
Changes to an existing AI system can be required, such as the way in which users interface with system, to integrate shareable connection factories into the design-time interfaces. A user may wish to be able to select the type of connection for an application view, such as a ‘shareable’ connection or an ‘owned’ connection. A user may also wish to see a list of available connection factories, as well as the properties of those connection factories. In one example, multiple pages of a user interface can be used to show connection factory properties, such as a summary of attributes from a shareable connection factory. In addition, an AI console can be used that implements a new page to display references to a shareable connection factory. A reference page can display any application view currently using a shareable connection factory, and can allow the client to un-deploy all referenced application views.
Shareable connection factories can be determined by using connector component managed beans (MBeans). These MBeans can also be used to determine the Java Naming and Directory Interface (JNDI) locations of those connections. The JNDI specification is published by Sun Microsystems, Inc., of Santa Clara, Calif. The JNDI location of a connection can be set into an application view property, such as “connectionFactoryJNDIName.” An application view deployer can use this property to later deploy the application view. Since a connection factory can be deployed into any JNDI location, there may be no need to identify owned connection factories. Owned connection factories can be determined by a lookup in the repository. If the connection factory exists in the repository, the factory may be unable to be shared.
In some embodiments, the only object having knowledge of an adapter logical name is the connection factory. This name can be used to uniquely identify an adapter and any associated resources. This attribute may not be available to design-time interfaces if the application view uses a shareable connection factory. This attribute can be added to an application descriptor interface, such as “ApplicationDesciptor.” In addition, any methods in an administration deployer extracting administration information objects may need to be reviewed for usage of the logical name.
A connection factory selection page can be the first page that a user sees after defining an application view. The selection page can allow the user to select the type of connection factory to associate with the new application view. If a shareable connection factory is being used, the user can select a specific connection factory. If the user selects an owned connection factory, the next page displayed to the user can contain connection configuration information. If the user selects a shareable connection, the next page can include administration information.
There can be a field, such as a check box or radio button, displayed to a user for each existing connection factory. There can be a field for each shareable connection factory, as well as a field for a new connection factory. In addition to a field, a reference link can be displayed next to each shareable connection factory. This reference link can allow a user to view application views that are deployed with the shareable connection factory.
One system can allow a user to navigate to either a ‘select connection’ or ‘connection configuration’ page at any time during an application view definition process. The user can switch connection types at any time in the application view definition process prior to deployment.
An application view deploy page can display shareable connection factory properties and relevant application view properties when the application view contains a reference to a shareable connection factory. A deploy page can use the current managed connection factory to extract the relevant attributes to allow a user to identify which connection factory is being used.
In an application view, options such as a deploy tab and a connection tab can be used to display shareable connection factory properties when an application view references a shareable connection factory. In addition, both tabs can contain a references link to allow a user to view deployed application views referencing the selected connection factory.
A reference page can be a child window that displays the fully qualified name for any deployed application view currently referencing the connection factory. A reference page can be accessed from a page such as a connection selection page or an application view summary page. Undeploying a shareable connection factory that has application view references can be catastrophic in certain circumstances. A reference page can allow the user to undeploy any deployed application views currently referencing the shareable connection factory.
An AI deployment engine may not identify the connection factory that each application view references without extracting the descriptors from an AI repository. Such functionality may not meet the requirements for identifying and persisting this information into JNDI. The deployment interfaces can maintain a JNDI repository for each shareable connection factory. Connection factory instances can be stored in a connection factory JNDI (sub-)context, for example. This context can contain two new contexts, such as ‘shared’ and ‘references’. The shared context can contain the references sub-context, and the references sub-context can contain a sub-context for each shareable connection factory having outstanding references. The references contained in the shared context can be string objects containing the fully qualified name of an application view. The name can reference the connection factory identified by the sub-context.
For each connection factory deployed, a repository can be created in the references context. The Repository can be named using the user defined connection factory name concatenated with an identifier, such as ‘_connectionFactoryReferences’. The repository can contain the fully qualified name for every application view that has a reference to the connection factory.
When an application view that uses a shareable connection is deployed, the application view deployer can add a fully-qualified application view name to the references repository. Similarly, when an application view containing a reference to a shared connection factory is undeployed, an application view deployer can be responsible for removing the JNDI reference in the reference repository for the connection factory. If the application view is the only or last reference, the connection factory sub-context can be removed as well.
All shareable connection factories can be re-referenced in an AI startup process. A user can ensure that the connection factories deployed through a system console are available for the deployment process. If a connection factory is not found, the application view deployment can fail.
New interfaces can be added to an XCCI layer. XCCI, or XML-CCI, is a dialect of the common client interface (CCI) that uses XML-based record formats to represent data. XCCI provides the tools and framework for supporting such a record format. There are two primary components of XCCI: services and document records. Interfaces can be added, such as “ProxiedMarker” and “ProxiedConnection.” An interface such as ProxiedMarker can be implemented by a in implementation class such as “com.adapter.cci.ConnectionFactoryImpl.” The marker can be used to determine whether the associated connection is a proxy object. An interface such as ProxiedConnection can be implemented by an abstract connection class, such as “com.adapter.cci.AbstractConnection”, and can be used to return the real connection associated with the proxy. A ProxiedConnection interface can have a single method to get an adapter connection, such as a getAdapterConnection( ) interface. A method such as getAdapterConnection( ) can be defined in the abstract connection class, which can return a pointer such as a “this” pointer. A proxied connection interface can be necessary, as a proxy can only return interfaces that the proxy implements. The proxy cannot distinguish class objects in its derivation tree.
To accommodate migration, certain properties can be added to an adapter properties file. Certain properties, such as navigation or “nav” properties for example, can correspond to toolbar items displayed in an application integration console. The remainder of the properties can be used as labels for the shareable connection displays. To utilize the shareable connection functionality, the adapter developer can use the latest ADK and design-time interfaces.
The foregoing description of preferred embodiments of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalence.
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent Application No. 60/377,353 entitled “SHARED COMMON CONNECTION FACTORY”, filed May 2, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. The following applications are cross-referenced and incorporated herein by reference: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/377,322 entitled “Application View Transactions,” by Timothy Potter et al., filed May 2, 2002. U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/377,303 entitled “Adapter Deployment Without Recycle,” by Timothy Potter et al., filed May 2, 2002. U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/377,354 entitled “Modular Deployment of Components,” by Timothy Potter et al., filed May 2, 2002. U.S. Provisional Application No. 10/271,194 entitled “Application View,” by Mitch Upton et al., filed Oct. 15, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5321841 | East et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5469562 | Saether | Nov 1995 | A |
5604860 | McLaughlin et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5630131 | Palevich et al. | May 1997 | A |
5748975 | Van De Vanter | May 1998 | A |
5801958 | Dangelo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5835769 | Jervis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836014 | Faiman, Jr. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862327 | Kwang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867822 | Sankar | Feb 1999 | A |
5933838 | Lomet | Aug 1999 | A |
5944794 | Okamoto et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950010 | Hesse et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961593 | Gabber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966535 | Benedikt et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6012083 | Savitzky et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016495 | McKeehan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018730 | Nichols et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023578 | Birsan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023722 | Colyer | Feb 2000 | A |
6028997 | Leymann | Feb 2000 | A |
6029000 | Woolsey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044217 | Brealey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067548 | Cheng | May 2000 | A |
6067623 | Blakely, III et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070184 | Blount et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085030 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092102 | Wagner | Jul 2000 | A |
6119149 | Notani | Sep 2000 | A |
6141686 | Jackowski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141701 | Whitney | Oct 2000 | A |
6148336 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6185734 | Saboff et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212546 | Starkovich et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222533 | Notani et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226675 | Meltzer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230287 | Pinard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230309 | Turner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237135 | Timbol | May 2001 | B1 |
6243737 | Flanagan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256676 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282561 | Jones et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282711 | Halpern et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292932 | Baisley et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311327 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324681 | Sebesta et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330569 | Baisley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334114 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336122 | Lee et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338064 | Ault et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343265 | Glebov et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349408 | Smith | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353923 | Bogle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360358 | Elsbree et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367068 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377939 | Young | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393605 | Loomans | May 2002 | B1 |
6408311 | Baisley et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411698 | Bauer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6445711 | Scheel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463503 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470364 | Prinzing | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6516322 | Meredith | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549949 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560636 | Cohen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6560769 | Moore et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567738 | Gopp et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6584454 | Hummel et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594693 | Borwankar | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594700 | Graham et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601113 | Koistinen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604198 | Beckman et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609115 | Mehring et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615258 | Barry et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636491 | Kari et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6637020 | Hammond | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643652 | Helgeson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654932 | Bahrs et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662357 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678518 | Eerola | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684388 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687702 | Vaitheeswaran et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687848 | Najmi | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721740 | Skinner et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721779 | Maffeis | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732237 | Jacobs et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6748420 | Quatrano et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754884 | Lucas et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757689 | Battas et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6789054 | Makhlouf | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795967 | Evans et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799718 | Chan et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6802000 | Greene et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804686 | Stone et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6823495 | Vedula et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832238 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836883 | Abrams et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847981 | Song et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850979 | Saulpaugh et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859180 | Rivera | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6874143 | Murray et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6889244 | Gaither et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6915519 | Williamson et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918084 | Slaughter et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922827 | Vasilik et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6950872 | Todd, II | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6959307 | Apte | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963914 | Breitbart et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6971096 | Ankireddipally et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976061 | Sharma | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976086 | Sadeghi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7000219 | Barrett et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7017146 | Dellarocas et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7043722 | Bau, III | May 2006 | B2 |
7051072 | Stewart et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051316 | Charisius et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054858 | Sutherland | May 2006 | B2 |
7062718 | Kodosky et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069507 | Alcazar et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072934 | Helgeson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073167 | Iwashita | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076772 | Zatloukal | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089584 | Sharma | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096422 | Rothschiller et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107578 | Alpern | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111243 | Ballard et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7117504 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127704 | Van De Vanter et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143186 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146422 | Marlatt et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155705 | Hershberg et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7159007 | Stawikowski | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7165041 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181731 | Pace et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184967 | Mital et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7240331 | Vion-Dury et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260599 | Bauch et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260818 | Iterum et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
20020004848 | Sudarshan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010781 | Tuatini | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010803 | Oberstein et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016759 | Macready et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049788 | Lipkin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020073080 | Lipkin | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073396 | Crupi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078365 | Burnett et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083075 | Brummel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111922 | Young et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116454 | Dyla et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120685 | Srivastava et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143960 | Goren et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152106 | Stoxen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161826 | Arteaga et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165936 | Alston et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169644 | Greene | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174241 | Beged-Dov | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184610 | Chong et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188486 | Gil et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194244 | Raventos | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194267 | Flesner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194495 | Gladstone et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004746 | Kheirolomoom et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005181 | Bau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014439 | Boughannam | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018661 | Darugar | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018665 | Dovin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018832 | Amirisetty et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018963 | Ashworth et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023957 | Bau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028579 | Kulkarni et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041198 | Exton et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043191 | Tinsley et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046266 | Mullins et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046591 | Asghari-Kamrani et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051066 | Pace et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055868 | Fletcher et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055878 | Fletcher et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074217 | Beisiegel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079029 | Garimella et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084203 | Yoshida et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093575 | Upton et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110117 | Saidenberg et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110446 | Nemer | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126136 | Omoigui | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149791 | Kane et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167358 | Marvin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030196168 | Hu | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225944 | Mousseau et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233631 | Curry et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019645 | Goodman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040040011 | Bosworth et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068568 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078373 | Ghoneimy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103406 | Patel | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133660 | Junghuber et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148336 | Hubbard et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040204976 | Oyama et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216086 | Bau | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225995 | Marvin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260715 | Mongeon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050050068 | Vaschillo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050278585 | Spencer | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060206856 | Breeden et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060234678 | Juitt et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070038500 | Hammitt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2248634 | Mar 2000 | CA |
WO 0190884 | Nov 2001 | EP |
WO9923558 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0029924 | May 2000 | WO |
0190884 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040034859 A1 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60377353 | May 2002 | US | |
60377322 | May 2002 | US | |
60377303 | May 2002 | US | |
60377354 | May 2002 | US |