The present invention relates to an optical free space interconnect of circuitry. Particularly, the present invention concerns optical interconnection employed in computers.
One of the current approaches to increasing computational and control power is to link multiple low cost, distributed processors together. In this manner, the cost associated with a single processor capable of the similar computational efficiency may be avoided. Currently the distributed processing is achieved by employing high-speed data links using conventional wire and connector technology, referred to herein as “hardwired technology”. Specifically, the high-speed data links facilitate data communication between processor nodes and other dedicated component-to-component and/or board-to-board applications as processor speeds increase. As processor speeds increase, however, the present data-links will result in data transfer bottlenecks, due to the limited data transfer rate the same may provide. Moreover, data link reliability may be compromised as the number of wires employed in the data link increases.
To improve the operational characteristics of the aforementioned data links, advancements in optical communication systems have been employed to replace the conventional the hardwired technology. A well-known example includes the replacement of conventional copper wires used for telephony with optical dielectric wave guides commonly know as optical fibers. This has generated a need for improvement methodologies to interconnect the optical fibers together or with other optical devices such as light sources, light detectors, and the like. To that end, the prior art is replete with improved techniques for interconnecting optical components.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,057,319 to Ash et al. discloses such a technique. Specifically, the patent to Ash et al. discloses an optical system in which individual connections are made involving the passage of light between a specific device in one array of optical devices and a specific device in another array of optical devices via a phase hologram plate of the transmission type fixed relative to each array.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,140,657 to Thylen discloses a device for optically coupling an optical fiber, forming part of an optical communication system, to an optical semiconductor laser amplifier. Specifically, the semiconductor laser amplifier has an input facet and an output facet, and the optical fiber has an end surface arranged opposite to at least one of the facets. A diffraction optics element is disposed between the end surface of the fiber and the surface of the facet in order to adapt the nearfield of the fiber end to the nearfield of the facet surface while filtering the same to reduce spontaneous emission noise. The diffraction optics element is described as being a phase hologram.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,072,579 to Funato discloses an optical pickup apparatus that includes first and second light sources that selectively emit one of first and second light beams. The first and second light beams are different in wavelength and are suitable for accessing first and second optical disks respectively. A coupling lens converts a corresponding one of the first and second light beams into a collimated beam. An objective lens forms a light spot on a corresponding one of the first and second optical disks by focusing the collimated beam. A holographic optical element receives a reflection beam of the light spot from one of the first and second optical disks and provides holographic effects on the reflection beam so as to diffract the reflection beam in predetermined diffracting directions depending on the wavelength of the reflection beam. A photo detector receives the reflection beam from the holographic optical element at light receiving areas and outputs signals indicative of respective intensities of the received reflection beam at the light receiving areas, so that a focusing error signal and a tracking error signal are generated based on the signals. A drawback with the aforementioned optical interconnect systems is that each coupling device requires precise alignment of the optical elements to achieve efficient coupling of optical energy.
What is needed, therefore, is an optical coupling technique that decreases the alignment tolerances of the various optical devices between which optical energy is coupled.
Provided is an optical communication system and method that features concurrently refracting and filtering, employing a holographic transform, optical energy to impinge upon an optical detector with unwanted characteristics of the optical energy being removed. To that end, the system includes a source of optical energy to direct optical energy along a path, an optical detector disposed in the path, and an optical apparatus. The optical apparatus has a spherical surface and a holographic transform function, with the optical apparatus being disposed to filter the optical energy in accordance with properties of the holographic transform function to remove optical energy having unwanted characteristics, defining transformed optical energy, and refract the transformed energy in accordance with properties of the spherical surface to impinge upon a detector.
In another embodiment, the system includes an array of optical transmitters to generate optical energy to propagate along a plurality of axes and an array of optical receivers, each of which is positioned to sense optical energy propagating along one of the plurality of optical axes. The optical apparatus includes first and second arrays of refractory lens. Each of the lens of the first array is disposed in one of the plurality of axes and has a first holographic transform function disposed thereon to filter from the optical energy unwanted characteristics. The first holographic transform function associated with a subgroup of the lens of the first array, defines a transfer function that differs from the first holographic transform function associated with the remaining lens of the first array of lenses. Each of the lenses of the second array is disposed between the first array of lenses and the array of optical receivers to collect optical energy propagating along the one of the plurality of optical axes. A subset of the lenses of the second array having a spherical surface with a second holographic transform function disposed on the second surface that matches the transfer function. A method is also disclosed, the functions of which are carried out by the aforementioned systems.
Referring to
The unwanted characteristics that may be removed from the optical energy 18 includes wavelength or polarization information. Specifically, the optical apparatus 16 is a refractory lens having a bulk hologram recorded therein that defines the transform function. The bulk hologram facilitates characterizing the optical energy 18 to have desired characteristics that may improve detection, by the optical detector 14, of information contained in the optical energy 18. For example, the transform function may allow a specific wavelength to pass through the lens, diffracting all other wavelengths to deflect away from the optical detector 14. Alternatively, the transform function may allow only a certain polarization of the optical energy 18 to propagate therethrough, diffracting all other polarizations away from the optical detector 14.
The refractory function of the optical apparatus 16 facilitates impingement of the optical energy 18 onto the optical detector 14. In this manner, the precise alignment of the optical detector 14 with respect to the source 12 and, therefore, the path 20 may be relaxed.
Referring to
Referring to both
Referring to
Specifically, referring to
Specifically, the optical apparatus 316 may include an additional array of lenses 400b that match the pitch of the individual detectors 314a–314p of the array 314, shown more clearly in
In one example, superior performance was found by having the array 314 sectioned into (m×n) bins, with each bin corresponding to a particular polarization and/or wavelength that matched a particular polarization and/or wavelength corresponding to a transmitter 312a–312p. Thus, were a beam from one or more of the transmitters 312a–312p to flood the entire (M×N) array 314 or multiple (m×n) bins, only the appropriate detectors 314a–314p sense information with a very high signal-to-noise ratio and discrimination capability. It will be noted that the (m×n) bins can also be effectively comprised of a single sensing pixel (element) to exactly match the (X×Y) array.
Additional beam-sensor discrimination may be achieved by employing transmitters 312a–312p having different wavelengths or by incorporating up-conversion processes that include optical coatings applied to the individual transmitters 312a–312p or made integral therewith. One such up-conversion process is described by F. E. Auzel in “Materials and Devices Using Double-Pumped Phosphors With Energy Transfer”, Proc. of IEEE, vol. 61. no. 6, June 1973.
Referring to
Referring to
The etched substrate 614 has two arcuate regions 616 that are located in areas of the photosensitive layer 600 disposed adjacent to the islands 612, shown in
Referring to
Although the invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, one skilled in the art will recognize that various changes to the invention may be performed, and are meant to be included herein. For example, instead of forming the arcuate regions 616 using standard etch techniques, the same may be formed by exposing the substrate 610, shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3610926 | Kastner et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3751132 | Croh | Aug 1973 | A |
3785736 | Spitz et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3885856 | Ostrowsky et al. | May 1975 | A |
4057319 | Ash et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4296994 | Quick et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4359259 | Horner et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4392709 | Horner et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4510575 | Mueller et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4655539 | Caulfield et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4710605 | Presby | Dec 1987 | A |
4807978 | Grinberg et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817207 | Smith et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4897541 | Phillips | Jan 1990 | A |
H738 | McManus et al. | Feb 1990 | H |
4932989 | Presby | Jun 1990 | A |
4953954 | Ewbank et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4991150 | Wixom | Feb 1991 | A |
5008890 | McFarlane | Apr 1991 | A |
5011254 | Edwards et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5056039 | Caulfield | Oct 1991 | A |
5103324 | Brandstetter | Apr 1992 | A |
5132813 | Caulfield et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5140657 | Thylen | Aug 1992 | A |
5245623 | McFarlane | Sep 1993 | A |
5256851 | Presby | Oct 1993 | A |
5295208 | Caulfield et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5325386 | Jewell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5369415 | Richard et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5399315 | Paz-Pujalt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411709 | Furuki et al. | May 1995 | A |
5442433 | Hoshino et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446334 | Gaffney | Aug 1995 | A |
5446572 | Husbands et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446816 | Shiraishi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5467104 | Furness, III et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5515194 | Kanterakis et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521913 | Gridley | May 1996 | A |
5596339 | Furness, III et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602679 | Dolgoff et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5622868 | Clarke et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5659327 | Furness, III et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5677778 | Kanterakis et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5699464 | Marcuse et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706114 | Erteza | Jan 1998 | A |
5772720 | Taira-Griffin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5793919 | Payne et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5809198 | Weber et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822091 | Baker | Oct 1998 | A |
5832147 | Yeh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854697 | Caulfield et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857042 | Robertson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5886822 | Spitzer | Mar 1999 | A |
5915097 | Chao | Jun 1999 | A |
5930012 | Mears et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935288 | DiGiovanni et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943149 | Cearns et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6008781 | Furness, III et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6055099 | Webb | Apr 2000 | A |
6072579 | Funato | Jun 2000 | A |
6079252 | Tabler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081430 | La Rue | Jun 2000 | A |
6083767 | Tjaden et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6144472 | Knox | Nov 2000 | A |
6151144 | Knox | Nov 2000 | A |
6185215 | Aho | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6246026 | Vergeest | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246680 | Muller et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6284546 | Bryning et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304694 | Ford | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314210 | Fukushima et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6449066 | Arns et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452700 | Mays, Jr. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6486984 | Baney et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6542264 | Agranat et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6826368 | Koren et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20020024702 | Mays | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020089709 | Mays, Jr. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020167698 | Mays | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191254 | Mays, Jr. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191598 | Mays, Jr. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9959766 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9960192 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0002700 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0004660 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0005026 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0028359 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0032327 | Jun 2000 | WO |