The subject matter of this application is related to the subject matter in the following applications:
This disclosure is generally related to the distribution of digital content. More specifically, this disclosure is related to a shared and distributed pending interest table in a content-centric network.
The proliferation of the Internet and e-commerce continues to create a vast amount of digital content. Content-centric network (CCN) architectures have been designed to facilitate accessing and processing such digital content. A CCN includes entities, or nodes, such as network clients, forwarders (e.g., routers), and content producers, which communicate with each other by sending “interest” packets for various content items and receiving “content object” packets in return. CCN interests and content objects are identified by their unique names, which are typically hierarchically structured variable-length identifiers (HSVLI). An HSVLI can include contiguous name components ordered from a most general level to a most specific level.
A CCN node stores an interest in an entry in a pending interest table (PIT), which includes the name and a receiving interface associated with the interest. When the node receives the corresponding content object, the node consumes (i.e., retrieves and removes) the PIT entry and forwards the content object via the interface specified in the PIT entry.
The node can have limited resources (e.g., limited amount of memory) to store its PIT. If the node forwards a large volume of data flow, the node can receive a large number of interests for content objects. As a result, the node's PIT can quickly become full (i.e., the memory available for the PIT is occupied and a new interest cannot be incorporated). The node typically does not accept interests if the local PIT is full. As a result, the node drops any subsequent interests.
One embodiment provides a pending interest table (PIT) sharing system that facilitates sharing of a PIT. During operation, the system receives, by a local interface, a first message comprising an interest from a node of origin. The hop count for the interest has not been decreased. The system creates an entry, which includes a name of the interest, in a PIT for the interest. If the system receives a content object associated with the name, the system retrieves and removes the entry from the PIT, and sends the content object to the node of origin in a second message.
In a variation on this embodiment, the name of the interest is based on one or more of: a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier (HSVLI), which comprises contiguous name components ordered from a most general level to a most specific level. The HSVLI is applicable in a portal instance corresponding to the stack; a flat name that does not indicate any hierarchy; a role of the component within the stack; and a unique identifier, which is specific to the component of the stack.
In a variation on this embodiment, the first and second messages also include an interface of origin indicating an interface via which the node of origin has received the interest. The entry then further includes an identifier of the interface of origin.
In a further variation, the PIT is a proxy PIT dedicated for interests from the node of origin. The proxy PIT is distinct from a local PIT for interests from a locally coupled device.
In a further variation, the entry also includes an identifier of a tunnel interface of a tunnel coupling the node of origin.
In a variation on this embodiment, the first and second messages are tunnel-encapsulated messages. A respective interface of origin is associated with an individual tunnel.
In a variation on this embodiment, the interest from the node of origin is distinguished from interests from a locally coupled device based on distinct namespaces.
In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
Overview
Embodiments of the present invention solve the problem of extending a pending interest table (PIT) by sharing the PIT with a proxy node. With existing technologies, when a CCN node receives a large number of interests, its PIT can become full. As a result, the node drops any subsequent interest until a content object returns. To solve this problem, the node can offload some of the PIT entries to another node, which can be referred to as a proxy node. The proxy node maintains a set of proxy PIT entries for the node (i.e., the node of origin). When the proxy node receives the content object for an interest with a proxy PIT entry, the proxy node forwards the content object to the node.
In some embodiments, the node establishes a tunnel with the proxy node. Upon receiving an interest, the node determines whether the interest should be in a local PIT entry or a proxy PIT entry. The node can allocate different namespace for local and proxy PIT entries. For example, the node can determine that any interest with a prefix “/a/b/” should be in a local PIT entry and any interest with a prefix “/p1/” should be in a proxy PIT entry. Upon determining an interest to be a candidate for a proxy PIT entry, the node sends the interest and an interface of origin (i.e., the interface via which the node has received the interest) to the proxy node via the tunnel. The proxy node then creates a proxy PIT entry (e.g., either in a different proxy PIT or in its local PIT) comprising the name of the interest and the interface of origin. The proxy node then forwards the interest.
When the proxy node receives the content object for the interest, the proxy node retrieves and removes the proxy PIT entry, and sends the content object and the interface of origin back to the node via the tunnel. The node receives the content object and the interface of origin, and forwards the content object via the interface of origin. In this way, the node shares PIT entries with the proxy node, thereby extending the capacity of its PIT. It should be noted that forwarding information via a tunnel includes encapsulating the information in a tunnel encapsulation.
In some embodiments, a PIT operates under the CCN architecture. In CCN, each piece of content is individually named, and each piece of data is bound to a unique name that distinguishes the data from any other piece of data, such as other versions of the same data or data from other sources. This unique name allows a network device to request the data by disseminating a request or an interest that indicates the unique name, and can obtain the data independent from the data's storage location, network location, application, and means of transportation. The following terms are used to describe the CCN architecture:
Content Object (or “content object”): A single piece of named data, which is bound to a unique name. Content Objects are “persistent,” which means that a Content Object can move around within a computing device, or across different computing devices, but does not change. If any component of the Content Object changes, the entity that made the change creates a new Content Object that includes the updated content, and binds the new Content Object to a new unique name.
Unique Names: A name in a CCN is typically location-independent and uniquely identifies a Content Object. A data-forwarding device can use the name or name prefix to forward a packet toward a network node that generates or stores the Content Object, regardless of a network address or physical location for the Content Object. In some embodiments, the name may be a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier (HSVLI). The HSVLI can be divided into several hierarchical components, which can be structured in various ways. For example, the individual name components parc, home, ccn, and test.txt can be structured in a left-oriented prefix-major fashion to form the name “/parc/home/ccn/test.txt.” Thus, the name “/parc/home/ccn” can be a “parent” or “prefix” of “/parc/home/ccn/test.txt.” Additional components can be used to distinguish among different versions of the content item, such as a collaborative document.
In some embodiments, the name can include an identifier, such as a hash value that is derived from the Content Object's data (e.g., a checksum value) and/or from elements of the Content Object's name. A description of a hash-based name is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/847,814, which is herein incorporated by reference. A name can also be a flat label. Hereinafter, “name” is used to refer to any name for a piece of data in a name-data network, such as a hierarchical name or name prefix, a flat name, a fixed-length name, an arbitrary-length name, or a label (e.g., a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) label).
Interest (or “interest”): A packet that indicates a request for a piece of data, and includes a name (or a name prefix) for the piece of data. A data consumer can disseminate a request or Interest across an information-centric network, which CCN/NDN routers can propagate toward a storage device (e.g., a cache server) or a data producer that can provide the requested data to satisfy the request or Interest.
In addition, “lci” and “ccnx” refer to labeled content information and indicate a Universal Resource Indicator (URI) compliant identifier in which name segments carry a label. Network protocols such as CCN can use labeled content information by applying specific labels to each name segment of a URI. In a hierarchically structured name, a labeled content name assigns a semantic type or label to each segment. For example, a type of name segment can include a name segment, which is a generic name segment that includes arbitrary octets, which allows a CCN to use a binary on-the-wire representation for messages.
The methods disclosed herein are not limited to CCN networks and are applicable to other architectures as well. A description of a CCN architecture is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,175, which is herein incorporated by reference.
Exemplary Network and Communication
With existing technologies, when node 102 receives a large number of interests, its PIT can become full. As a result, node 102 drops any subsequent interest from device 116 until a content object returns. To solve this problem, node 102 can offload some of the PIT entries to a proxy node 114. Node 114 maintains a set of proxy PIT entries for node 102. In some embodiments, node 102 establishes a tunnel 140 with node 114 between interfaces 142 and 144. Upon receiving an interest 132 from device 116 via interface 146, node 102 determines whether the interest should be in a local PIT entry or a proxy PIT entry. Node 102 can allocate different namespaces 152 and 154 for local and proxy PIT entries, respectively. For example, the node can allocate namespace 152 as prefix “/a/b/” and namespace 154 as prefix “/p1/.” Namespace 154 can be referred to as a proxy namespace.
Suppose that interest 132 is for a content object identified by a name “/p1/q1,” which is in namespace 154. As a result, node 102 determines interest 132 to be a candidate for a proxy PIT entry. Node 102 then includes interest 132 and an interface of origin 134 in a message 130, which can be a tunnel message (i.e., a message encapsulated in a tunneling protocol) and sends message 130 via tunnel 140. Message 130 can be referred to as a proxy message. In some embodiments, interface of origin 134 can be an identifier of interface 146. Node 114 receives message 130 and obtains interest 132 and interface of origin 134 by decapsulating message 130. Node 114 creates a proxy PIT entry (e.g., either in a different proxy PIT or in its local PIT) comprising name “/p1/q1” and the identifier of interface 146. The proxy node then forwards interest 132 in network 100.
Suppose that device 118 is the producer of the content object. When device 118 receives interest 132, device 118 sends the content object associated with name “/p1/q1” to node 114. Node 114 receives the content object, and retrieves and removes the proxy PIT entry associated with name “/p1/q1.” Node 114 includes the content object and interface of origin 134 in a message 136, which can be an encapsulated message that can be forwarded via a tunnel, and sends message 136 via tunnel 140 to node 102. Node 102 receives message 136, and obtains the content object and interface of origin 134 by decapsulating message 136. Since interface of origin 134 is an identifier of interface 146, node 102 forwards the content object via interface 146 to device 116. In this way, node 102 shares PIT entries with proxy node 114, thereby extending the capacity of node 102's PIT.
It should be noted that even though node 102 is sharing a PIT with node 114, these nodes construct and maintain their own forwarding information base (FIB). Furthermore, the distribution of namespaces 152 and 154 ensures distribution of interests received at node 102 between nodes 102 and 114. However, node 102 remains the node of origin. As a result, in contrast to load balancing techniques, content objects associated with both namespaces 152 and 154 are eventually forwarded to node 102.
Exemplary PIT Sharing
Suppose that node 114, which is the proxy node of node 102, maintains PIT 220 for local entry and proxy PIT 225 for proxy entries. PIT 220 stores an interest name 222 and a local interface 224 via which node 114 has received a local interest. Proxy PIT 225 stores an interest name 226 and an interface of origin 228, which is an interface of node 102. Here, storing an interface indicates storing an identifier of the interface. This identifier can be a local and internal identifier of a node.
Upon receiving message 130, node 114 obtains interest 132 and an identifier of interface 136 by decapsulating message 130. Node 114 determines that name “/p1/q1” in interest 132 is in namespace 154 and hence, should be in a proxy PIT entry. Node 114 then creates an entry in a proxy PIT 225 comprising name “/p1/q1” and the identifier of interface 146. Node 114 then forwards interest 132 in network 100. When node 114 receives a content object 202, node 114 retrieves and removes the proxy PIT entry associated with name “/p1/q1.” Node 114 includes content object 202 and the identifier of interface 146 in message 136 and sends message 136 via tunnel 140 to node 102.
Node 102 receives message 136, and obtains content object 202 and the identifier of interface 146 by decapsulating message 136. Since node 102 has received message 136 via tunnel 140, node 102 is aware that message 136 includes a content object and the interface via which content object 202 should be forwarded. In some embodiments, node 102 determines that name “/p1/q1” of content object 202 is in namespace 154 and hence, content object 202 has already “consumed” a proxy PIT entry. Node 102 then forwards content object 202 via interface 146 to device 116 without consulting its local PIT 210. In this way, node 102 uses proxy node 114 to extend the capacity of node 102's PIT while continuing using a local PIT.
However, when node 102 receives interest 204 from device 250, node 102 determines that name “/a/b/c/d” in interest 204 is in namespace 152 and hence, should be in a local PIT entry. Node 102 then creates an entry in PIT 210. PIT 210 stores an interest name 212 and an interface 214. The entry comprises name “/a/b/c/d” of interest 204 and the identifier of interface 252. Node 102 then forwards interest 204 in network 100. Suppose that node 102 receives a corresponding content object 205 from node 114. Upon receiving content object 205, node 102 determines that name “a/b/c/d” of content object 205 is in namespace 152 and hence, should be processed based on a local PIT entry. Node 102 retrieves and removes the proxy PIT entry associated with name “a/b/c/d” to obtain an identifier of interface 252. Node 102 then forwards content object 205 via interface 252 to device 250.
In the same way, when node 114 receives interest 206 from device 120, node 114 determines that name “/x/y/z” in interest 206 is from a local interface 148 and hence, should be in a local PIT entry. Node 114 then creates an entry in PIT 220 comprising name “x/y/z” and the identifier of interface 148. Node 114 then forwards interest 206 in network 100. Suppose that node 102 receives a corresponding content object 207. Upon receiving content object 207, node 114 determines that name “x/y/z” of content object 207 is not in namespace 154 and hence, should been processed based on a local PIT entry. Node 114 retrieves and removes the PIT entry associated with name “x/y/z” to obtain an identifier of interface 148. Node 114 then forwards content object 207 via interface 148 to device 120.
If an entry in PIT 230 is a proxy entry, node 114 stores both the proxy interface (i.e., the interface via which node 114 has received a proxy message) and the interface of origin. On the other hand, if an entry in PIT 230 is a local entry, node 114 stores an identifier of the interface via which the interest has been received. In some embodiments, if an entry in PIT 230 is a local entry, node 114 also stores a value indicating that the entry is a local entry. Examples of the value include, but are not limited to, a null value, an empty value (or string), and a value sufficiently distinct from an identifier of an interface.
Upon receiving message 130 via interface 144, node 114 obtains interest 132 and an identifier of interface 136 by decapsulating message 130. Node 114 determines that name “/p1/q1” in interest 132 is in namespace 154 and hence, should be in a proxy entry. Node 114 then creates an entry in PIT 230 comprising name “/p1/q1,” the identifier of proxy interface 144, and the identifier of interface 146. Node 114 then forwards interest 132 in network 100. When node 114 receives content object 202, node 114 retrieves and removes the PIT entry associated with name “/p1/q1.” Node 114 includes content object 202 and the identifier of interface 146 in message 136 and sends message 136 via proxy interface 144.
On the other hand, when node 114 receives interest 206 from device 120, node 114 determines that name “/x/y/z” in interest 206 is from a local interface 148 and hence, should be in a local PIT entry. Node 114 then creates an entry in PIT 230 comprising name “x/y/z,” a value 210, which indicates the PIT entry to be a local PIT entry, and the identifier of interface 148. Here, node 114 can use value 210 in place of a proxy interface value (i.e., in the same column) to use the same PIT for both local and proxy entries. In the same way, node 114 uses the same column to store identifiers of interfaces 146 and 148. Node 114 then forwards interest 206 in network 100. Suppose that node 102 receives a corresponding content object 207. Upon receiving content object 207, node 114 retrieves and removes the PIT entry associated with name “x/y/z” to obtain value 210 and an identifier of interface 148. Node 114 determines that value 210 is present in the entry and hence, the entry is a local entry. Node 114 then forwards content object 207 via interface 148 to device 120.
Since node 102 maintains mapping 280, node 114 stores proxy entries and local entries in the same PIT 240. PIT 240 stores an interest name 242 and an interface 244. Interface 244 represents the local interface via which node 114 has received an interest or a proxy message. Here, storing an interface indicates storing an identifier of the interface. In this example, node 102 encapsulates interest 132 in message 131 and forwards message 131 via interface 142. Upon receiving message 131 via interface 144, node 114 obtains interest 132 by decapsulating message 131. Node 114 then creates an entry in PIT 240 comprising name “/p1/q1” and the identifier of interface 144 via which node 114 has received interest 132. Node 114 then forwards interest 132 in network 100. When node 114 receives content object 202, node 114 retrieves and removes the PIT entry associated with name “/p1/q1.” Node 114 includes content object 202 in message 138 and sends message 138 via obtained interface 144.
Upon receiving message 138 via interface 142, node 102 decapsulates message 138 to obtain content object 202. Node 102 determines that message 138 is received via tunnel 140 and hence, is from a proxy node. In some embodiments, node 102 determines that name “/p1/q1” of content object 202 is in namespace 154 and hence, content object 202 has already “consumed” a proxy PIT entry. Node 102 then looks up interface 142 in mapping 280 to obtain interface 146 as the interface via which content object 202 should be forwarded. Node 102 then forwards content object 202 via interface 146 to device 116 without consulting its local PIT 210.
Forwarding Interest to the Proxy Node
When node 102 forwards interest 132 to node 114, node 102 uses tunnel 140 to forward interest 132.
If the name is not in the proxy namespace, the node creates a local PIT entry comprising the name and the local interface (operation 306). The node then forwards the interest based on the local FIB (operation 310). If the name is in the proxy namespace, the node encapsulates the interest and an interface of origin, which is the local interface, in a tunnel message (operation 308). The node may not include the interface of origin in the tunnel message if the node maintains a tunnel mapping, as described in conjunction with
Operations of the Proxy Node
This interest travels though the network and the corresponding content object comes back to the node. The node receives the content object associated with the name (operation 412) and selects the proxy PIT based on the name matching a proxy namespace (operation 414). The node obtains the interface of origin associated with the name from the proxy PIT and removes the corresponding PIT entry (operation 416). Since the name is in the proxy namespace, the node selects the interface of the proxy tunnel as the outgoing interface (operation 418). The node encapsulates the content object and the interface of origin in a tunnel message (operation 420) and forwards the tunnel message via the selected interface (operation 422).
This interest travels though the network and the corresponding content object comes back to the node. The node receives the content object associated with the name (operation 442). The node obtains the interface of origin and the proxy interface associated with the name from the PIT and removes the corresponding PIT entry (operation 444). Since the name is in the proxy namespace, the node determines the interface of the proxy tunnel to be the outgoing interface. The node encapsulates the content object and the interface of origin in a tunnel message (operation 446) and forwards the tunnel message via the obtained proxy interface (operation 448).
This interest travels though the network and the corresponding content object comes back to the node. The node receives the content object associated with the name (operation 470). The node obtains the proxy interface associated with the name from the PIT and removes the corresponding PIT entry (operation 472). The node encapsulates the content object in a tunnel message (operation 474) and forwards the tunnel message via the obtained proxy interface (operation 476).
Forwarding Content Object
Exemplary Apparatus and Computer System
In some embodiments, communication module 602 can send and/or receive data packets to/from other network nodes across a computer network, such as a content-centric network. Communication module 602 can create, send. and receive tunnel-encapsulated messages. Such messages can include one or more of: an interest, a content object, an interface of origin, and a proxy interface. Tunneling module 604 can encapsulate a notification message in a tunnel encapsulation (e.g., based on a tunneling protocol).
PIT management module 606 allows apparatus 600 to operate as a proxy node. PIT management module 606 maintains and manages proxy entries in a PIT (either in a separate or a combined PIT) for interests from a node of origin. Proxy management module 608 allows apparatus 600 to operate as a node of origin. Proxy management module 608 determines a proxy node and a proxy namespace. PIT management module 606 also determines whether a name is in a proxy namespace. In some embodiments, proxy management module 608 maintains a mapping between a tunnel interface and an interface of origin.
PIT sharing system 718 can include instructions, which when executed by computer system 702, can cause computer system 702 to perform methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, PIT sharing system 718 may include instructions for sending and/or receiving data packets to/from other network nodes across a computer network, such as a content-centric network (communication module 720). Further, PIT sharing system 718 may include instructions for sending and/or receiving data packets to/from other network nodes across a computer network, such as a content-centric network. This packet can be an encapsulated message.
PIT sharing system 718 can include instructions for encapsulating a notification message in a tunnel encapsulation (e.g., based on a tunneling protocol) (tunneling module 722). PIT sharing system 718 can also include instructions for maintaining and managing proxy entries in a PIT (either in a separate or a combined PIT) for interests from a node of origin (PIT management module 724). In addition, PIT sharing system 718 can include instructions for determining whether a name is in a proxy namespace (PIT management module 724). Furthermore, PIT sharing system 718 can also include instructions for a proxy node and a proxy namespace, and for maintaining a mapping between a tunnel interface and an interface of origin (proxy management module 726).
Data 732 can include any data that is required as input or that is generated as output by the methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, data 732 can store one or more PITs and a mapping. Data 732 can also include an FIB of computer system 702.
The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer-readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. The computer-readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs), DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), or other media capable of storing computer-readable media now known or later developed.
The methods and processes described in the detailed description section can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium as described above. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the computer-readable storage medium.
Furthermore, the methods and processes described above can be included in hardware modules. For example, the hardware modules can include, but are not limited to, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules are activated, the hardware modules perform the methods and processes included within the hardware modules.
The foregoing descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
817441 | Niesz | Apr 1906 | A |
4309569 | Merkle | Jan 1982 | A |
4921898 | Lenney | May 1990 | A |
5070134 | Oyamada | Dec 1991 | A |
5110856 | Oyamada | May 1992 | A |
5214702 | Fischer | May 1993 | A |
5377354 | Scannell | Dec 1994 | A |
5506844 | Rao | Apr 1996 | A |
5629370 | Freidzon | May 1997 | A |
5845207 | Amin | Dec 1998 | A |
5870605 | Bracho | Feb 1999 | A |
6021464 | Yao | Feb 2000 | A |
6047331 | Medard | Apr 2000 | A |
6052683 | Irwin | Apr 2000 | A |
6085320 | Kaliski | Jul 2000 | A |
6091724 | Chandra | Jul 2000 | A |
6105122 | Muller | Aug 2000 | A |
6128623 | Mattis | Oct 2000 | A |
6128627 | Mattis | Oct 2000 | A |
6173364 | Zenchelsky | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6209003 | Mattis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226618 | Downs | May 2001 | B1 |
6233617 | Rothwein | May 2001 | B1 |
6233646 | Hahm | May 2001 | B1 |
6289358 | Mattis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292880 | Mattis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6332158 | Risley | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363067 | Chung | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366988 | Skiba | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6574377 | Cahill | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6654792 | Verma | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6667957 | Corson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681220 | Kaplan | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681326 | Son | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6732273 | Byers | May 2004 | B1 |
6769066 | Botros | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772333 | Brendel | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775258 | vanValkenburg | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6834272 | Naor | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6862280 | Bertagna | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6901452 | Bertagna | May 2005 | B1 |
6915307 | Mattis | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6917985 | Madruga | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6957228 | Graser | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6968393 | Chen | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6981029 | Menditto | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7007024 | Zelenka | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7013389 | Srivastava | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031308 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043637 | Bolosky | May 2006 | B2 |
7061877 | Gummalla | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7080073 | Jiang | Jul 2006 | B1 |
RE39360 | Aziz | Oct 2006 | E |
7149750 | Chadwick | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152094 | Jannu | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7177646 | ONeill | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7206860 | Murakami | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206861 | Callon | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7210326 | Kawamoto | May 2007 | B2 |
7233948 | Shamoon | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7246159 | Aggarwal | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257837 | Xu | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7287275 | Moskowitz | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7315541 | Housel | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7339929 | Zelig | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350229 | Lander | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7362727 | ONeill | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7382787 | Barnes | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7395507 | Robarts | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430755 | Hughes | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7444251 | Nikovski | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7466703 | Arunachalam | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7472422 | Agbabian | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7496668 | Hawkinson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7509425 | Rosenberg | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7523016 | Surdulescu | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7535926 | Deshpande | May 2009 | B1 |
7542471 | Samuels | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543064 | Juncker | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552233 | Raju | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555482 | Korkus | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555563 | Ott | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564812 | Elliott | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7567547 | Mosko | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567946 | Andreoli | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7580971 | Gollapudi | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7623535 | Guichard | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636767 | Lev-Ran | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647507 | Feng | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7660324 | Oguchi | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685290 | Satapati | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698463 | Ogier | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698559 | Chaudhury | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7769887 | Bhattacharyya | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7779467 | Choi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801069 | Cheung | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801177 | Luss | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7816441 | Elizalde | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831733 | Sultan | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7873619 | Faibish | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7908337 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7924837 | Shabtay | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7953014 | Toda | May 2011 | B2 |
7953885 | Devireddy | May 2011 | B1 |
7979912 | Roka | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8000267 | Solis | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010691 | Kollmansberger | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8069023 | Frailong | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8074289 | Carpentier | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8117441 | Kurien | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8160069 | Jacobson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8204060 | Jacobson | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214364 | Bigus | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8224985 | Takeda | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8225057 | Zheng | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8239331 | Shanmugavelayutham | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8271578 | Sheffi | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271687 | Turner | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8312064 | Gauvin | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8332357 | Chung | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8375420 | Farrell | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386622 | Jacobson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8447851 | Anderson | May 2013 | B1 |
8462781 | McGhee | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467297 | Liu | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473633 | Eardley | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8553562 | Allan | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572214 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8654649 | Vasseur | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8665757 | Kling | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8667172 | Ravindran | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8677451 | Bhimaraju | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8688619 | Ezick | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8699350 | Kumar | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8718055 | Vasseur | May 2014 | B2 |
8750820 | Allan | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8761022 | Chiabaut | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762477 | Xie | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762570 | Qian | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762707 | Killian | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767627 | Ezure | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8817594 | Gero | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8826381 | Kim | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8832302 | Bradford | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8836536 | Marwah | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8861356 | Kozat | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8862774 | Vasseur | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868779 | ONeill | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8874842 | Kimmel | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8880682 | Bishop | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903756 | Zhao | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8923293 | Jacobson | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8934496 | Vasseur | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8937865 | Kumar | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8972969 | Gaither | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8977596 | Montulli | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002921 | Westphal | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9032095 | Traina | May 2015 | B1 |
9071498 | Beser | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9112895 | Lin | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9137152 | Xie | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9253087 | Zhang | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9270598 | Oran | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9280610 | Gruber | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9609014 | Solis | Mar 2017 | B2 |
20020002680 | Carbajal | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010795 | Brown | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020038296 | Margolus | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020048269 | Hong | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054593 | Morohashi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077988 | Sasaki | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078066 | Robinson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020138551 | Erickson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152305 | Jackson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188605 | Adya | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199014 | Yang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004621 | Bousquet | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009365 | Tynan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033394 | Stine | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046396 | Richter | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046421 | Horvitz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046437 | Eytchison | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048793 | Pochon | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051100 | Patel | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061384 | Nakatani | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074472 | Lucco | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088696 | McCanne | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097447 | Johnston | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099237 | Mitra | May 2003 | A1 |
20030140257 | Peterka | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030229892 | Sardera | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024879 | Dingman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030602 | Rosenquist | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064737 | Milliken | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040071140 | Jason | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073617 | Milliken | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073715 | Folkes | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040139230 | Kim | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040196783 | Shinomiya | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218548 | Kennedy | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221047 | Grover | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225627 | Botros | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233916 | Takeuchi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246902 | Weinstein | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252683 | Kennedy | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267902 | Yang | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003832 | Osafune | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028156 | Hammond | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043060 | Brandenberg | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050211 | Kaul | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066121 | Keeler | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074001 | Mattes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050132207 | Mourad | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149508 | Deshpande | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159823 | Hayes | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198351 | Nog | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050238050 | Pung | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249196 | Ansari | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259637 | Chu | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262217 | Nonaka | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281288 | Banerjee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286535 | Shrum | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289222 | Sahim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010249 | Sabesan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029102 | Abe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039379 | Abe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060051055 | Ohkawa | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072523 | Richardson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099973 | Nair | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129514 | Watanabe | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133343 | Huang | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146686 | Kim | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173831 | Basso | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193295 | White | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203804 | Whitmore | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206445 | Andreoli | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215684 | Capone | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060223504 | Ishak | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242155 | Moore | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256767 | Suzuki | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268792 | Belcea | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288237 | Goodwill | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019619 | Foster | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070073888 | Madhok | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094265 | Korkus | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112880 | Yang | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124412 | Narayanaswami | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127457 | Mirtorabi | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156998 | Gorobets | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070160062 | Morishita | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162394 | Zager | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171828 | Dalal | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189284 | Kecskemeti | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195765 | Heissenbuttel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204011 | Shaver | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070209067 | Fogel | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239892 | Ott | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240207 | Belakhdar | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245034 | Retana | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253418 | Shiri | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255677 | Alexander | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255699 | Sreenivas | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255781 | Li | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274504 | Maes | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275701 | Jonker | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276907 | Maes | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283158 | Danseglio | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294187 | Scherrer | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005056 | Stelzig | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005223 | Flake | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010366 | Duggan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037420 | Tang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043989 | Furutono | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046340 | Brown | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059631 | Bergstrom | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080440 | Yarvis | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082662 | Dandliker | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095159 | Suzuki | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101357 | Iovanna | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103896 | Flake | May 2008 | A1 |
20080107034 | Jetcheva | May 2008 | A1 |
20080107259 | Satou | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123862 | Rowley | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133583 | Artan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133755 | Pollack | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151755 | Nishioka | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159271 | Kutt | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165775 | Das | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186901 | Itagaki | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200153 | Fitzpatrick | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215669 | Gaddy | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216086 | Tanaka | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243992 | Jardetzky | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250006 | Dettinger | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256138 | Sim-Tang | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256359 | Kahn | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270618 | Rosenberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271143 | Stephens | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287142 | Keighran | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288580 | Wang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291923 | Back | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298376 | Takeda | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320148 | Capuozzo | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006659 | Collins | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013324 | Gobara | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022154 | Kiribe | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024641 | Quigley | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030978 | Johnson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037763 | Adhya | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052660 | Chen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067429 | Nagai | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077184 | Brewer | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092043 | Lapuh | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090097631 | Gisby | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103515 | Pointer | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113068 | Fujihira | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116393 | Hughes | May 2009 | A1 |
20090117922 | Bell | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132662 | Sheridan | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135728 | Shen | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144300 | Chatley | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157887 | Froment | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090185745 | Momosaki | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193101 | Munetsugu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198832 | Shah | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222344 | Greene | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228593 | Takeda | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090254572 | Redlich | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268905 | Matsushima | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274158 | Sharp | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276396 | Gorman | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090285209 | Stewart | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287835 | Jacobson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287853 | Carson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288076 | Johnson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288143 | Stebila | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288163 | Jacobson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292743 | Bigus | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293121 | Bigus | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296719 | Maier | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300079 | Shitomi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300407 | Kamath | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300512 | Ahn | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307286 | Laffin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307333 | Welingkar | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323632 | Nix | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005061 | Basco | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027539 | Beverly | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046546 | Ram | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057929 | Merat | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100058346 | Narang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088370 | Wu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094767 | Miltonberger | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094876 | Huang | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098093 | Ejzak | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100465 | Cooke | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103870 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124191 | Vos | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125911 | Bhaskaran | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131660 | Dec | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150155 | Napierala | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165976 | Khan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169478 | Saha | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169503 | Kollmansberger | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180332 | Ben-Yochanan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182995 | Hwang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185753 | Liu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195653 | Jacobson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100195654 | Jacobson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100195655 | Jacobson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217874 | Anantharaman | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217985 | Fahrny | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232402 | Przybysz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232439 | Dham | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235516 | Nakamura | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246549 | Zhang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250497 | Redlich | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250939 | Adams | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257149 | Cognigni | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268782 | Zombek | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272107 | Papp | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281263 | Ugawa | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284309 | Allan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284404 | Gopinath | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293293 | Beser | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100316052 | Petersen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322249 | Thathapudi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332595 | Fullagar | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110013637 | Xue | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019674 | Iovanna | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022812 | vanderLinden | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029952 | Harrington | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055392 | Shen | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055921 | Narayanaswamy | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060716 | Forman | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060717 | Forman | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090908 | Jacobson | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106755 | Hao | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131308 | Eriksson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137919 | Ryu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145597 | Yamaguchi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145858 | Philpott | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149858 | Hwang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153840 | Narayana | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158122 | Murphy | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161408 | Kim | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110202609 | Chaturvedi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110219093 | Ragunathan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219427 | Hito | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219727 | May | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225293 | Rathod | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231578 | Nagappan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239256 | Gholmieh | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Ramer | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264824 | Venkata Subramanian | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265159 | Ronda | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265174 | Thornton | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271007 | Wang | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280214 | Lee | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286457 | Ee | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286459 | Rembarz | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295783 | Zhao | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299454 | Krishnaswamy | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120011170 | Elad | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011551 | Levy | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023113 | Ferren | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036180 | Thornton | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045064 | Rembarz | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047361 | Erdmann | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066727 | Nozoe | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079056 | ZoltÃ?Âin | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120102136 | Srebrny | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120106339 | Mishra | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110159 | Richardson | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114313 | Phillips | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120803 | Farkas | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127994 | Ko | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136676 | Goodall | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136936 | Quintuna | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136945 | Lee | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137367 | Dupont | May 2012 | A1 |
20120141093 | Yamaguchi | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155464 | Kim | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158973 | Jacobson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163373 | Lo | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166433 | Tseng | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170913 | Isozaki | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179653 | Araki | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197690 | Agulnek | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198048 | Loffe | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221150 | Arensmeier | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224487 | Hui | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226902 | Kim | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120257500 | Lynch | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120284791 | Miller | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290669 | Parks | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290919 | Melnyk | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291102 | Cohen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300669 | Zahavi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307629 | Vasseur | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314580 | Hong | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317307 | Ravindran | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317643 | Kim | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317655 | Zhang | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120322422 | Frecks | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323933 | He | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331112 | Chatani | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130024560 | Vasseur | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130041982 | Shi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051392 | Filsfils | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054971 | Yamaguchi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060962 | Wang | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130061084 | Barton | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130066823 | Sweeney | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073552 | Rangwala | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073882 | Inbaraj | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130074155 | Huh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090942 | Robinson | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091237 | Ambalavanar | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091539 | Khurana | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110987 | Kim | May 2013 | A1 |
20130111063 | Lee | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128786 | Sultan | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132719 | Kobayashi | May 2013 | A1 |
20130139245 | Thomas | May 2013 | A1 |
20130151584 | Westphal | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151646 | Chidambaram | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130152070 | Bhullar | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163426 | Beliveau | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166668 | Byun | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173822 | Hong | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182568 | Lee | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182931 | Fan | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185406 | Choi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191412 | Kitamura | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130197698 | Shah | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198119 | Eberhardt, III | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212185 | Pasquero | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219038 | Lee | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219081 | Qian | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219478 | Mahamuni | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223237 | Hui | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227048 | Xie | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227114 | Vasseur | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227166 | Ravindran | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130242996 | Varvello | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250809 | Hui | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262365 | Dolbear | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262698 | Schwan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275544 | Westphal | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282854 | Jang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282860 | Zhang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282920 | Zhang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304758 | Gruber | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304937 | Lee | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325888 | Oneppo | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329696 | Xu | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332971 | Fisher | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336103 | Vasseur | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336323 | Srinivasan | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339481 | Hong | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343408 | Cook | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140003232 | Guichard | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003424 | Matsuhira | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006354 | Parkison | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006565 | Muscariello | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140029445 | Hui | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032714 | Liu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033193 | Palaniappan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040505 | Barton | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040628 | Fort | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140043987 | Watve | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047513 | vantNoordende | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074730 | Arensmeier | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075567 | Raleigh | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082135 | Jung | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082661 | Krahnstoever | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089454 | Jeon | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096249 | Dupont | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098685 | Shattil | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108313 | Heidasch | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108474 | David | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115037 | Liu | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122587 | Petker et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129736 | Yu | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136814 | Stark | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140348 | Perlman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143370 | Vilenski | May 2014 | A1 |
20140146819 | Bae | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149733 | Kim | May 2014 | A1 |
20140237095 | Petker | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156396 | deKozan | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140165207 | Engel | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172783 | Suzuki | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172981 | Kim | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173034 | Liu | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173076 | Ravindran | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181140 | Kim | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192677 | Chew | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192717 | Liu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195328 | Ferens | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195641 | Wang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195666 | Dumitriu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204945 | Byun | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214942 | Ozonat | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140233575 | Xie | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140237085 | Park | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245359 | DeFoy | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140254595 | Luo | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280823 | Varvello | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281489 | Peterka | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281505 | Zhang | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282816 | Xie | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289325 | Solis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289790 | Wilson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298248 | Kang | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314093 | You | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140337276 | Iordanov | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140365550 | Jang | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150006896 | Franck | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150018770 | Baran | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150032892 | Narayanan | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150033365 | Mellor | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039890 | Khosravi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150063802 | Bahadur | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089081 | Thubert | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150095481 | Ohnishi | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150095514 | Yu | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150120663 | Lescouarnec | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150169758 | Assom | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188770 | Naiksatam | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150195149 | Vasseur | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207633 | Ravindran | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207864 | Wilson | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150279348 | Cao | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150288755 | Mosko | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312300 | Mosko | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150341373 | Solis et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150349961 | Mosko | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150372903 | Hui | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381546 | Mahadevan | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160014234 | Oran | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160019275 | Mosko | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021172 | Mahadevan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160062840 | Scott | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160110466 | Uzun | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160171184 | Solis | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170012867 | Royon | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170134276 | White | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103873371 | Jun 2014 | CN |
1720277 | Jun 1967 | DE |
19620817 | Nov 1997 | DE |
0295727 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0757065 | Jul 1996 | EP |
1077422 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1383265 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1384729 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1473889 | Nov 2004 | EP |
2120402 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2120419 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2120419 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2124415 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2214357 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2299754 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2323346 | May 2011 | EP |
2533495 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2552083 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2214356 | May 2016 | EP |
03005288 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03042254 | May 2003 | WO |
03049369 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03091297 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2005041527 | May 2005 | WO |
2007113180 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2007122620 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007144388 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2011049890 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2012077073 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013123410 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014023072 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2015084327 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
RTMP (2009). Available online at http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/rtmp/ pdf/rtmp specification 1.0.pdf. |
Garnepudi Parimala et al “Proactive, reactive and hybrid multicast routing protocols for Wireless Mesh Networks”, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, IEEE, Dec. 26, 2013, pp. 1-7. |
Marc Mosko: “CCNx 1.0 Protocol Introduction” Apr. 2, 2014 [Retrieved from the Internet Jun. 8, 2016] http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/hhg/1.1%20CCNx%201.0%20Protocol%20Introduction.pdf *paragraphs [01.3], [002], [02.1], [0003]. |
Akash Baid et al: “Comparing alternative approaches for networking of named objects in the future Internet”, Computer Communications Workshops (Infocom Wkshps), 2012 IEEE Conference on, IEEE, Mar. 25, 2012, pp. 298-303, *Paragraph [002]* *figure 1*. |
Priya Mahadevan: “CCNx 1.0 Tutorial”, Mar. 16, 2014, pp. 1-11, Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/hhg/1.2%20CCNx%201.0%20Tutorial.pdf [retrieved on Jun. 8, 2016] *paragraphs [003]—[006], [0011], [0013]* *figures 1,2*. |
Marc Mosko et al “All-In-One Streams for Content Centric Networks”, May 24, 2015, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/AllinOne.pdf [downloaded Jun. 9, 2016] *the whole document*. |
Cesar Ghali et al. “Elements of Trust in Named-Data Networking”, Feb. 13, 2014 Retrieved from the internet Jun. 17, 2016 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.3332v5.pdf *p. 5, col. 1* *p. 2, col. 1-2* * Section 4.1; p. 4, col. 2* *Section 4.2; p. 4, col. 2*. |
Priya Mahadevan et al. “CCN-KRS”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information-Centric Networking, Inc. '14, Sep. 24, 2014. |
Flavio Roberto Santos Et al. “Funnel: Choking Polluters in BitTorrent File Sharing Communities”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, IEEE vol. 8, No. 4, Dec. 1, 2011. |
Liu Wai-Xi et al: “Multisource Dissemination in content-centric networking”, 2013 Fourth International conference on the network of the future (NOF), IEEE, Oct. 23, 2013, pp. 1-5. |
Marie-Jose Montpetit et al.: “Network coding meets information-centric networking”, Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on emerging Name-Oriented mobile networking design, architecture, algorithms, and applications, NOM '12, Jun. 11, 2012, pp. 31-36. |
Asokan et al.: “Server-Supported Signatures”, Computer Security Esorics 96, Sep. 25, 1996, pp. 131-143, Section 3. |
Mandl et al.: “A Fast FPGA Based Coprocessor Supporting Hard Real-Time Search”, New Frontiers of Information Technology, Proceedings of the 23rd Euromicro Conference Budapest, Sep. 1, 1997, pp. 499-506 *The Whole Document*. |
Sun et al.: “Content-Based Route Lookup Using CAMs”, Global Communications Conference, IEEE, Dec. 3, 2012 *The Whole Document*. |
Gelenbe et al.: “Networks With Cognitive Packets”, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, 2000. IEEE, Aug. 29, 2000, pp. 3-10. |
Vangelis et al.: “On the Role of Semantic Descriptions for Adaptable Protocol Stacks in the Internet of Things”, 2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, IEEE, May 13, 2014, pp. 437-443, *last paragraph of section II.B*. |
Smetters et al. “Securing Network Content” Technical Report, PARC TR-2009-1, Oct. 1, 2009, Retrieved from the internet URL:http//www.parc.com/content/altachments/TR-2009-01.pdf [retrieved Nov. 1, 2016]. |
Marc Mosko “CCNx Label Forwarding (CCNLF)” Jul. 21, 2014. |
Gallo Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs “Content-Centric Networking Packet Header Format” Jan. 26, 2015. |
Huard J-F et al. “A Programmable Transport Architecture with QOS Guarantees” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 36, No. 10, Oct. 1, 1998. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, 2002, Microsoft Press, p. 23. |
Mind—A Brief Introduction, John R. Searle, 2004, Oxford University Press, pp. 62-67. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/026346, dated Jun. 28, 2017, 11 pgs. |
Saxena, et al., “Named Data Networking: A Survey”, Computer Science Review, XP029469974, ISSN: 1574-0137, Feb. 21, 2016, 41 pgs. |
Jacobson, Van et al., “Content-Centric Networking, Whitepaper Describing Future Assurable Global Networks”, Palo Alto Research Center, Inc., Jan. 30, 2007, pp. 1-9. |
Koponen, Teemu et al., “A Data-Oriented (and Beyond) Network Architecture”, SIGCOMM '07, Aug. 27-31, 2007, Kyoto, Japan, XP-002579021, p. 181-192. |
Ao-Jan Su, David R. Choffnes, Aleksandar Kuzmanovic, and Fabian E. Bustamante. Drafting Behind Akamai: Inferring Network Conditions Based on CDN Redirections. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking {Feb., 2009). |
“PBC Library-Pairing-Based Cryptography-About,” http://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc. downloaded Apr. 27, 2015. |
Boneh et al., “Collusion Resistant Broadcast Encryption With Short Ciphertexts and Private Keys”, 2005. |
D. Boneh and M. Franklin. Identity-Based Encryption from the Weil Pairing. Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO 2001, vol. 2139, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2001). |
Anteniese et al., “Improved Proxy Re-Encryption Schemes with Applications to Secure Distributed Storage”, 2006. |
J. Bethencourt, A, Sahai, and B. Waters, ‘Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption,’ in Proc. IEEE Security & Privacy 2007, Berkeley, CA, USA, May 2007, pp. 321-334. |
J. Lotspiech, S. Nusser, and F. Pestoni. Anonymous Trust: Digit. |
J. Shao and Z. Cao. CCA-Secure Proxy Re-Encryption without Pairings. Public Key Cryptography. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceVolume 5443 (2009). |
Gopal et al. “Integrating content-based Mechanisms with hierarchical File systems”, Feb. 1999, University of Arizona, 15 pages. |
R. H. Deng, J. Weng, S. Liu, and K. Chen. Chosen-Ciphertext Secure Proxy Re-Encryption without Pairings. CANS. Spring Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5339 (2008). |
S. Chow, J. Weng, Y. Yang, and R. Deng. Efficient Unidirectional Proxy Re-Encryption. Progress in Cryptology—AFRICACRYPT 2010. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2010). |
S. Kamara and K. Lauter. Cryptographic Cloud Storage. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2010). |
Sandvine, Global Internet Phenomena Report—Spring 2012. Located online at http://www.sandvine.com/downloads/ documents/Phenomenal H 2012/Sandvine Global Internet Phenomena Report 1H 2012.pdf. |
The Despotify Project (2012). Available online at http://despotify.sourceforge.net/. |
V. K. Adhikari, S. Jain, Y. Chen, and Z.-L. Zhang. Vivisecting Youtube:An Active Measurement Study. In INFOCOM12 Mini-conference (2012). |
Vijay Kumar Adhikari, Yang Guo, Fang Hao, Matteo Varvello, Volker Hilt, Moritz Steiner, and Zhi-Li Zhang. Unreeling Netflix: Understanding and Improving Multi-CDN Movie Delivery. In the Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2012 (2012). |
Jacobson, Van et al. ‘VoCCN: Voice Over Content-Centric Networks.’ Dec. 1, 2009. ACM ReArch'09. |
Rosenberg, J. “Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols”, Apr. 2010, pp. 1-117. |
Shih, Eugene et al., ‘Wake on Wireless: An Event Driven Energy Saving Strategy for Battery Operated Devices’, Sep. 23, 2002, pp. 160-171. |
Fall, K. et al., “DTN: an architectural retrospective”, Selected areas in communications, IEEE Journal on, vol. 28, No. 5, Jun. 1, 2008, pp. 828-835. |
Gritter, M. et al., ‘An Architecture for content routing support in the Internet’, Proceedings of 3rd Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, 2001, pp. 37-48. |
“CCNx,” http://ccnx.org/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015. |
“Content Delivery Network”, Wikipedia, Dec. 10, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?titleContent_delivery_network&oldid=465077460. |
“Digital Signature” archived on Aug. 31, 2009 at http://web.archive.org/web/20090831170721/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature. |
“Introducing JSON,” http://www.json.org/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015. |
“Microsoft PlayReady,” http://www.microsoft.com/playready/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015. |
“Pursuing a pub/sub internet (PURSUIT),” http://www.fp7-pursuit.ew/PursuitWeb/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015. |
“The FP7 4WARD project,” http://www.4ward-project.eu/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015. |
A. Broder and A. Karlin, “Multilevel Adaptive Hashing”, Jan. 1990, pp. 43-53. |
Detti, Andrea, et al. “CONET: a content centric inter-networking architecture.” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Information-centric networking. ACM, 2011. |
A. Wolman, M. Voelker, N. Sharma N. Cardwell, A. Karlin, and H.M. Levy, “On the scale and performance of cooperative web proxy caching,” ACM SIGHOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 16-31, Dec. 1999. |
Afanasyev, Alexander, et al. “Interest flooding attack and countermeasures in Named Data Networking.” IFIP Networking Conference, 2013. IEEE, 2013. |
B. Ahlgren et al., ‘A Survey of Information-centric Networking’ IEEE Commun. Magazine, Jul. 2012, pp. 26-36. |
Bari, MdFaizul, et al. ‘A survey of naming and routing in information-centric networks.’ Communications Magazine, IEEE 50.12 (2012): 44-53. |
Baugher, Mark et al., “Self-Verifying Names for Read-Only Named Data”, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Mar. 2012, pp. 274-279. |
Brambley, Michael, A novel, low-cost, reduced-sensor approach for providing smart remote monitoring and diagnostics for packaged air conditioners and heal pumps. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2009. |
C.A. Wood and E. Uzun, “Flexible end-to-end content security in CCN,” in Proc. IEEE CCNC 2014, Las Vegas, CA, USA, Jan. 2014. |
Carzaniga, Antonio, Matthew J. Rutherford, and Alexander L. Wolf. ‘A routing scheme for content-based networking.’ INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. vol. 2. IEEE, 2004. |
Cho, Jin-Hee, Ananthram Swami, and Ray Chen. “A survey on trust management for mobile ad hoc networks.” Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 13.4 (2011): 562-583. |
Compagno, Alberto, et al. “Poseidon: Mitigating interest flooding DDoS attacks in named data networking.” Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2013 IEEE 38th Conference on. IEEE, 2013. |
Conner, William, et al. “A trust management framework for service-oriented environments.” Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 2009. |
Content Centric Networking Project (CON) [online], http://ccnx.org/releases/latest/doc/technical/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015. |
Content Mediator Architecture for Content-aware Networks (COMET) Project [online], http://www.comet-project.org/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015. |
D.K. Smetters, P. Golle, and J.D. Thornton, “CCNx access control specifications,” PARC, Tech. Rep., Jul. 2010. |
Dabirmoghaddam, Ali, Maziar Mirzazad Barijough, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. ‘Understanding optimal caching and opportunistic caching at the edge of information-centric networks.’ Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information-centric networking. ACM, 2014. |
Detti et al., “Supporting the Web with an information centric network that routes by name”, Aug. 2012, Computer Networks 56, pp. 3705-3702. |
Dijkstra, Edsger W., and Carel S. Scholten. ‘Termination detection for diffusing computations.’ Information Processing Letters 11.1 (1980): 1-4. |
Dijkstra, Edsger W., Wim HJ Feijen, and A_J M. Van Gasteren. “Derivation of a termination detection algorithm for distributed computations.” Control Flow and Data Flow: concepts of distributed programming. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1986. 507-512. |
E. Rescorla and N. Modadugu, “Datagram transport layer security,” IETF RFC 4347, Apr. 2006. |
E.W. Dijkstra, W. Feijen, and A.J.M. Van Gasteren, “Derivation of a Termination Detection Algorithm for Distributed Computations,” Information Processing Letter, vol. 16, No. 5, 1983. |
Fayazbakhsh, S. K., Lin, Y., Tootoonchian, A., Ghodsi, A., Koponen, T., Maggs, B., & Shenker, S. {Aug. 2013). Less pain, most of the gain: Incrementally deployable ICN. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 147-158). ACM. |
G. Tyson, S. Kaune, S. Miles, Y. El-Khatib, A. Mauthe, and A. Taweel, “A trace-driven analysis of caching in content-centric networks,” in Proc. IEEE ICCCN 2012, Munich, Germany, Jul.-Aug. 2012, pp. 1-7. |
G. Wang, Q. Liu, and J. Wu, “Hierarchical attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control in cloud storage services,” in Proc. ACM CCS 2010, Chicago, IL, USA, Oct. 2010, pp. 735-737. |
G. Xylomenos et al., “A Survey of Information-centric Networking Research,” IEEE Communication Surveys and Tutorials, Jul. 2013. |
Garcia, Humberto E., Wen-Chiao Lin, and Semyon M. Meerkov. “A resilient condition assessment monitoring system.” Resilient Control Systems (ISRCS), 2012 5th International Symposium on. IEEE, 2012. |
Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Jose J. ‘A unified approach to loop-free routing using distance vectors or link states.’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 19. No. 4. ACM, 1989. |
Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Jose J. ‘Name-Based Content Routing in Information Centric Networks Using Distance Information’ Proc ACM ICN 2014, Sep. 2014. |
Ghali, Cesar, GeneTsudik, and Ersin Uzun. “Needle in a Haystack: Mitigating Content Poisoning in Named-Data Networking.” Proceedings of NDSS Workshop on Security of Emerging Networking Technologies (SENT). 2014. |
Ghodsi, Ali, et al. “Information-centric networking: seeing the forest for the trees.” Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. ACM, 2011. |
Ghodsi, Ali, et al. “Naming in content-oriented architectures.” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Information-centric networking. ACM, 2011. |
Gupta, Anjali, Barbara Liskov, and Rodrigo Rodrigues. “Efficient Routing for Peer-to-Peer Overlays.” NSDI. vol. 4. 2004. |
Heckerman, David, John S. Breese, and Koos Rommelse. “Decision-Theoretic Troubleshooting.” Communications of the ACM. 1995. |
Heinemeier, Kristin, et al. “Uncertainties in Achieving Energy Savings from Hvac Maintenance Measures in the Field.” ASHRAE Transactions 118.Part 2 {2012). |
Herlich, Matthias et al., “Optimizing Energy Efficiency for Bulk Transfer Networks”, Apr. 13, 2010, pp. 1-3, retrieved for the Internet: URL:http://www.cs.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/informationik/ag-karl/publications/miscellaneous/optimizing.pdf (retrieved on Mar. 9, 2012). |
Hoque et al., ‘NLSR: Named-data Link State Routing Protocol’, Aug. 12, 2013, ICN 2013, pp. 15-20. |
I. Psaras, R.G. Clegg, R. Landa, W.K. Chai, and G. Pavlou, “Modelling and evaluation of CCN-caching trees,” in Proc. IFIP Networking 2011, Valencia, Spain, May 2011, pp. 78-91. |
Intanagonwiwat, Chalermek, Ramesh Govindan, and Deborah Estrin. ‘Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks.’ Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 2000. |
J. Aumasson and D. Bernstein, “SipHash: a fast short-input PRF”, Sep. 18, 2012. |
J. Hur, “Improving security and efficiency in attribute-based data sharing,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng., vol. 25, No. 10, pp. 2271-2282, Oct. 2013. |
V. Jacobson et al., ‘Networking Named Content,’ Proc. IEEE CoNEXT '09, Dec. 2009. |
Jacobson et al., “Custodian-Based Information Sharing,” Jul. 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine: vol. 50 Issue 7 (p. 3843). |
Ji, Kun, et al. “Prognostics enabled resilient control for model-based building automation systems.” Proceedings of the 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association. 2011. |
K. Liang, L. Fang, W. Susilo, and D.S. Wong, “A Ciphertext-policy attribute-based proxy re-encryption with chosen-ciphertext security,” in Proc. INCoS 2013, Xian, China, Sep. 2013, pp. 552-559. |
Katipamula, Srinivas, and Michael R. Brambley. “Review article: methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systemsa review, Part I.” HVAC&R Research 11.1 (2005): 3-25. |
Katipamula, Srinivas, and Michael R. Brambley. “Review article: methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systemsa review, Part II.” HVAC&R Research 11.2 (2005): 169-187. |
L. Wang et al., ‘OSPFN: An OSPF Based Routing Protocol for Named Data Networking,’ Technical Report NDN-0003, 2012. |
L. Zhou, V. Varadharajan, and M. Hitchens, “Achieving secure role-based access control on encrypted data in cloud storage,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 8, No. 12, pp. 1947-1960, Dec. 2013. |
Li, Wenjia, Anupam Joshi, and Tim Finin. “Coping with node misbehaviors in ad hoc networks: A multi-dimensional trust management approach.” Mobile Data Management (MDM), 2010 Eleventh International Conference on. IEEE, 2010. |
Lopez, Javier, et al. “Trust management systems for wireless sensor networks: Best practices.” Computer Communications 33.9 (2010): 1086-1093. |
M. Green and G. Ateniese, “Identity-based proxy re-encryption,” in Proc. ACNS 2007, Zhuhai, China, Jun. 2007, pp. 288-306. |
M. Ion, J. Zhang, and E.M. Schooler, “Toward content-centric privacy in ICN: Attribute-based encryption and routing,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ICN 2013, Hong Kong, China, Aug. 2013, pp. 39-40. |
M. Naor and B. Pinkas “Efficient trace and revoke schemes,” in Proc. FC 2000, Anguilla, British West Indies, Feb. 2000, pp. 1-20. |
M. Nystrom, S. Parkinson, A. Rusch, and M. Scott, “PKCS#12: Personal information exchange syntax v. 1.1,” IETF RFC 7292, K. Moriarty, Ed., Jul. 2014. |
M. Parsa and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “A Protocol for Scalable Loop-free Multicast Routing.” IEEE JSAC, Apr. 1997. |
M. Walfish, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Shenker, “Untangling the web from DNS,” in Proc. USENIX NSDI 2004, Oct. 2010, pp. 735-737. |
Mahadevan, Priya, et al. “Orbis: rescaling degree correlations to generate annotated internet topologies.” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 37. No. 4. ACM, 2007. |
Matocha, Jeff, and Tracy Camp. ‘A taxonomy of distributed termination detection algorithms.’ Journal of Systems and Software 43.3 (1998): 207-221. |
Matteo Varvello et al., “Caesar: A Content Router for High Speed Forwarding”, ICN 2012, Second Edition on Information-Centric Networking, New York, Aug. 2012. |
McWilliams, Jennifer A., and Iain S. Walker. “Home Energy Article: A Systems Approach to Retrofitting Residential HVAC Systems.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2005). |
Merindol et al., “An efficient algorithm to enable path diversity in link state routing networks”, Jan. 10, Computer Networks 55 (2011), pp. 1132-1140. |
Mobility First Project [online], http://mobilityfirst.winlab.rutgers.edu/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015. |
Narasimhan, Sriram, and Lee Brownston. “HyDE-A General Framework for Stochastic and Hybrid Modelbased Diagnosis.” Proc. DX 7 (2007): 162-169. |
NDN Project [online], http://www.named-data.net/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015. |
Omar, Mawloud, Yacine Challal, and Abdelmadjid Bouabdallah. “Certification-based trust models in mobile ad hoc networks: A survey and taxonomy.” Journal of Network and Computer Applications 35.1 (2012): 268-286. |
P. Mahadevan, E.Uzun, S. Sevilla, and J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “CCN-krs: A key resolution service for ccn,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information-centric Networking, Ser. INC 14 New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 97-106. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2660129.2660154. |
S. Deering, “Multicast Routing in Internetworks and Extended LANs,” Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '88, Aug. 1988. |
S. Deering et al., “The PIM architecture for wide-area multicast routing,” IEEE/ACM Trans, on Networking, vol. 4, No. 2, Apr. 1996. |
S. Jahid, P. Mittal, and N. Borisov, “Easier: Encryption-based access control in social network with efficient revocation,” in Proc. ACM ASIACCS 2011, Hong Kong, China, Mar. 2011, pp. 411-415. |
S. Kamara and K. Lauter, “Cryptographic cloud storage,” in Proc. FC 2010, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, Jan. 2010, pp. 136-149. |
S. Kumar et al. “Peacock Hashing: Deterministic and Updatable Hashing for High Performance Networking,” 2008, pp. 556-564. |
S. Misra, R. Tourani, and N.E. Majd, “Secure content delivery in information-centric networks: Design, implementation, and analyses,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ICN 2013, Hong Kong, China, Aug. 2013, pp. 73-78. |
S. Yu, C. Wang, K. Ren, and W. Lou, “Achieving secure, scalable, and fine-grained data access control in cloud computing,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2010, San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2010, pp. 1-9. |
S.J. Lee, M. Gerla, and C. Chiang, “On-demand Multicast Routing Protocol in Multihop Wireless Mobile Networks,” Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 7, No. 6, 2002. |
Scalable and Adaptive Internet Solutions (SAIL) Project [online], http://sail-project.eu/ Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015. |
Schein, Jeffrey, and Steven T. Bushby. A Simulation Study of a Hierarchical, Rule-Based Method for System-Level Fault Detection and Diagnostics in HVAC Systems. US Department of Commerce,[Technology Administration], National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005. |
Shani, Guy, Joelle Pineau, and Robert Kaplow. “A survey of point-based POMDP solvers.” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 27.1 (2013): 1-51. |
Sheppard, John W., and Stephyn GW Butcher. “A formal analysis of fault diagnosis with d-matrices.” Journal of Electronic Testing 23.4 (2007): 309-322. |
Shneyderman, Alex et al., ‘Mobile VPN: Delivering Advanced Services in Next Generation Wireless Systems’, Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 3-29. |
Solis, Ignacio, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. ‘Robust content dissemination in disrupted environments.’ proceedings of the third ACM workshop on Challenged networks. ACM, 2008. |
Sun, Ying, and Daniel S. Weld. “A framework for model-based repair.” AAAI. 1993. |
T. Ballardie, P. Francis, and J. Crowcroft, “Core Based Trees (CBT),” Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '88, Aug. 1988. |
T. Dierts, “The transport layer security (TLS) protocol version 1.2,” IETF RFC 5246, 2008. |
T. Koponen, M. Chawla, B.-G. Chun, A. Ermolinskiy, K.H. Kim, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica, ‘A data-oriented (and beyond) network architecture,’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 181-192, Oct. 2007. |
V. Goyal, 0. Pandey, A. Sahai, and B. Waters, “Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data,” in Proc. ACM CCS 2006, Alexandria, VA, USA, Oct.-Nov. 2006, pp. 89-98. |
V. Jacobson, D.K. Smetters, J.D. Thornton, M.F. Plass, N.H. Briggs, and R.L. Braynard, ‘Networking named content,’ in Proc. ACM CoNEXT 2009, Rome, Italy, Dec. 2009, pp. 1-12. |
Verma, Vandi, Joquin Fernandez, and Reid Simmons. “Probabilistic models for monitoring and fault diagnosis.” The Second IARP and IEEE/RAS Joint Workshop on Technical Challenges for Dependable Robots in Human Environments. Ed. Raja Chatila. Oct. 2002. |
Vutukury, Srinivas, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. A simple approximation to minimum-delay routing. vol. 29. No. 4. ACM, 1999. |
W.-G. Tzeng and Z.-J. Tzeng, “A public-key traitor tracing scheme with revocation using dynamic shares,” in Proc. PKC 2001, Cheju Island, Korea, Feb. 2001, pp. 207-224. |
Waldvogel, Marcel “Fast Longest Prefix Matching: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applications”, A dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 2002. |
Walker, Iain S. Best practices guide for residential HVAC Retrofits. No. LBNL-53592. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (US), 2003. |
Wang, Jiangzhe et al.,“DMND: Collecting Data from Mobiles Using Named Data”, Vehicular Networking Conference, 2010 IEEE, pp. 49-56. |
Xylomenos, George, et al. “A survey of information-centric networking research.” Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 16.2 (2014): 1024-1049. |
Yi, Cheng, et al. ‘A case for stateful forwarding plane.’ Computer Communications 36.7 (2013): 779-791. |
Yi, Cheng, et al. ‘Adaptive forwarding in named data networking.’ ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review 42.3 (2012): 62-67. |
Zhang, et al., “Named Data Networking (NDN) Project”, http://www.parc.com/publication/2709/named-data-networking-ndn-project.html, Oct. 2010, NDN-0001, PARC Tech Report. |
Zhang, Lixia, et al. ‘Named data networking.’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44.3 {2014): 66-73. |
Soh et al., “Efficient Prefix Updates for IP Router Using Lexicographic Ordering and Updateable Address Set”, Jan. 2008, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 57, No. 1. |
Beben et al., “Content Aware Network based on Virtual Infrastructure”, 2012 13th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering. |
D. Trossen and G. Parisis, “Designing and realizing and information-centric Internet,” IEEE Communications Magazing, vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 60-67, Jul. 2012. |
Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al., “Automatic Routing Using Multiple Prefix Labels”, 2012, IEEE, Ad Hoc and Sensor Networking Symposium. |
Gasti, Paolo et al., ‘DoS & DDoS in Named Data Networking’, 2013 22nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), Aug. 2013, pp. 1-7. |
Ishiyama, “On the Effectiveness of Diffusive Content Caching in Content-Centric Networking”, Nov. 5, 2012, IEEE, Information and Telecommunication Technologies (APSITT), 2012 9th Asia-Pacific Symposium. |
J. Hur and D.K. Noh, “Attribute-based access control with efficient revocation in data outsourcing systers,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst, vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 1214-1221, Jul. 2011. |
Kaya et al., “A Low Power Lookup Technique for Multi-Hashing Network Applications”, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on Emerging VLSI Technologies and Architectures, Mar. 2006. |
Hoque et al., “NLSR: Named-data Link State Routing Protocol”, Aug. 12, 2013, ICN'13. |
Nadeem Javaid, “Analysis and design of quality link metrics for routing protocols in Wireless Networks”, PhD Thesis Defense, Dec. 15, 2010, Universete Paris-Est. |
Wetherall, David, “Active Network vision and reality: Lessons form a capsule-based system”, ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Dec. 1, 1999. pp. 64-79. |
Kulkarni A.B. et al., “Implementation of a prototype active network”, IEEE, Open Architectures and Network Programming, Apr. 3, 1998, pp. 130-142. |
C. Gentry and A. Silverberg. Hierarchical ID-Based Cryptography. Advances in Cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2002. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2002). |
Zahariadis, Theodore, et al. “Trust management in wireless sensor networks.” European Transactions on Telecommunications 21.4 (2010): 386-395. |
Mahadevan, Priya, et al. “Systematic topology analysis and generation using degree correlations.” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 36. No. 4. ACM, 2006. |
Xiong et al., “CloudSeal: End-to-End Content Protection in Cloud-based Storage and Delivery Services”, 2012. |
https://code.google.com/p/ccnx-trace/. |
Biradar et al., “Review of multicast routing mechanisms in mobile ad hoc networks”, Aug. 16, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 35 (2012) 221-229. |
Lui et al. (A TLV-Structured Data Naming Scheme for Content-Oriented Networking, pp. 5822-5827, International Workshop on the Network of the Future, Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on Jun. 10-15, 2012). |
Peter Dely et al. “OpenFlow for Wireless Mesh Networks” Computer Communications and Networks, 2011 Proceedings of 20th International Conference on, IEEE, Jul. 31, 2011 (Jul. 31, 2011), pp. 1-6. |
Tiancheng Zhuang et al. “Managing Ad Hoc Networks of Smartphones”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Oct. 1, 2013. |
Xie et al. “Collaborative Forwarding and Caching in Content Centric Networks”, Networking 2012. |
Amadeo et al. “Design and Analysis of a Transport-Level Solution for Content-Centric VANETs”, University “Mediterranea” of Reggio Calabria, Jun. 15, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170295261 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |