The present disclosure relates to image sensors, and more particularly, to a 3D stacked active pixel sensor with shared pixels.
An active pixel sensor (APS) combines a photodiode with processing and amplification circuitry in each pixel to form an image sensor. In some implementations, the associated circuitry is implemented with four transistors, and may be referred to as a 4 T APS. Such sensors are commonly found in devices such as cell phone cameras, digital cameras, and web cameras.
Smaller APS and smaller pixels are enabled by the improvements in semiconductor processing. A consequence of smaller pixel size is that the pixel's photodiode must also shrink to accommodate the smaller APS area. Less light is then able to fall on each pixel, and as a result image quality is reduced. Conventionally, as pixel size is getting smaller, a plurality of pixels share transistor(s) so to increase fill factor, which represents the percentage of the pixel area that is consumed by the actual photodiode, and is a higher-is-better (HB) metric.
However, when a plurality of pixels share a transistor, each pixel contributes additional parasitic capacitance to the pixel sensor. The higher capacitance of the pixel sensor results in a lower conversion gain (CG), which is undesirable.
It is desirable to maintain conversion gain when more pixels share electrical circuitry. Further, it is desired to have high CG, especially for high sensitivity under low illumination conditions.
In an embodiment, an active pixel sensor comprises a plurality of pixels and a plurality of processing circuit. Each pixel includes a light sensitive element and a transfer gate. The plurality of pixels include at least one floating diffusion region. The plurality of processing circuits are associated with the plurality of pixels. Each processing circuit comprises a charge amplifier.
The present invention is illustrated in an exemplary manner by the accompanying drawings. The drawings should be understood as exemplary rather than limiting, as the scope of the invention is defined by the claims.
As will be discussed below, the disclosed embodiments allow for larger light sensitive elements in spite of shrinking image sensor circuit features through the use of a stacked configuration of sensor and circuit dies. Further, some of the disclosed embodiments achieve a stacked image sensor without requiring a floating diffusion region on the circuit die. Floating diffusion region is a combination of diffusion areas like drain of transfer transistor, source of reset transistor and parasitic capacitors associated therewith.
For examples, we have an array size 400×100=40K pixels. There will be 40K micro VIAs just for pixels. If 4 pixels share an amplifier AMP for example, the total micro VIAs to connect pixels will be 40,000/4=10K. Therefore shared pixel reduces number of micro VIAs.
However shared pixel causes higher parasitic capacitance in floating node, which translates to lower conversion gain. For example, transfer gate has drain area (diffusion) in floating node. There is parasitic capacitance between transfer gate poly gate and drain diffusion. In another example, each diffusion area has capacitance. Diffusion area cannot be shares when multiple pixels share floating area. The additional diffusion increases parasitic capacitance. The connection wires between multiple diffusion areas add more parasitic capacitance. Conversion Gain (CG) is a measure of voltage changes on floating node in response to the charge transferred from photoelectric converting device.
Lower conversion gain means that higher gain is needed to achieve required signal at same lighting condition, or higher noise. For example, amplifier AMP will generate noise, say “NAMP.” We use CG=100 uV/e− and 200 uV/e− as examples. The signal is 1000 electrons and an output signal 400 mV is desired. When CG=100 μV/e−, signal at the output bus Vout=100×10−3×1000+NAMP=100+NAMP (mV). Additional 4 times gain is needed to achieve 400 mV signal. Signal=4×(100+NAMP)=400+4×NAMP with noise “4×NAMP”. When CG=200 μV/e−, signal at the output bus Vout=200×10−3×1000+NAMP=200+NAMP (mV). Additional 2 times gain is needed to achieve 400 mV signal. Signal=2×(200+NAMP)=400+2×NAMP with noise “2×NAMP”. Assume 2× or 4× amplifier (not show in
Note that although
Floating diffusion node FD is virtual ground if the amplify AMP is ideal, that is if the amplifier gain is infinite, which makes the voltage difference between the positive and negative inputs zero. The floating diffusion node FD will keep at constant voltage REF (the same as the voltage of negative input INP of the amplifier AMP) in this case. Note that in
Therefore, the conversion gain for this embodiment can be represented as
Wherein e− represents an electron, and CF represents the capacitance of first capacitor CF.
V(FD)=REF, V(A)=REF, V(Vout)=REF,
wherein REF represents the voltage of the reference signal bus.
Q(FD)=CFD×REF, Q(A)=C1×REF
Then, assume a charge “q” is transferred to floating node, then
V(FD)=REF, V(A)=VA, V(Vout)=Vout
And there are constant charge numbers in both nodes “FD” and “A,” then
Q(FD)=CFD×REF+q+CF×(REF−VA)=CFD×REF
Q(A)=CF×(VA−REF)+C2×(VA−Vout)+C1×VA=C1×REF
From the two equations above, we have
Therefore, for the circuit shown in
With the above embodiment, Photo Response Non Uniformity (PRNU) can be improved. Basically, the signal should be same if same amount of photons hit a pixel. The variation of each pixel in response to the photon is called PRNU. The matching of CF becomes worse when CF is smaller, then the variation of conversion gain is bigger, i.e., PRNU is getting worse. There are many processing and amplification circuits 400 in pixel array. CF in every processing and amplification circuit 400 will be slightly different due to manufacturing variations. The smaller the CF, the higher percentage of the difference. For example, CF depends on the area of CF. Assume CF size is 10×10 and process variation (in each direction) is 1, the CF area ranges from 9×9 to 11×11. Max/Min==112/92=1.49. Alternatively, when CF is increased to 100×100 with same process variation, CF area ranges from 99×99 to 101×101. Max/Min=1012/992=1.04. Increased CF improves PRNU.
Further,
ratio can be adjusted to meet the CG requirement. The
ratio can be adjusted based on process variations. For example, the minimum area to achieve reasonable uniformity is 100. CG is 10 when use area 100 capacitor using circuit in 300 of
therefore C1=800.
Therefore in
Alternatively or in addition, the floating diffusion region is covered with metal layer. Assume many pixels share one amplifier. Then all drain nodes of transfer gates are connected together. In the case we have a very strong light hit one pixel (including the drain node of transfer gate), the entire floating node bus is constantly exposed. It is like pixels connected to this floating node bus are all very bright, which is called smear. Those of ordinary skill in the art can understand that when the floating diffusion region is covered with metal layer, which means that each floating node is covered with metal light shielding, the smear effect can be eliminated or alleviated.
Features and aspects of various embodiments may be integrated into other embodiments, and embodiments illustrated in this document may be implemented without all of the features or aspects illustrated or described. One skilled in the art will appreciate that although specific examples and embodiments of the system and methods have been described for purposes of illustration, various modifications can be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, embodiments of the present invention may be applied to image sensors having different types of light sensing devices, such as photodiodes, photogates, pinned photodiodes, and equivalents. Moreover, features of one embodiment may be incorporated into other embodiments, even where those features are not described together in a single embodiment within the present document. Accordingly, the invention is described by the appended claims.
Other variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims. In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. Even if certain features are recited in different dependent claims, the present invention also relates to an embodiment comprising these features in common. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.
Note that any and all of the embodiments described above can be combined with each other, except to the extent that it may be stated otherwise above or to the extent that any such embodiments might be mutually exclusive in function and/or structure.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be recognized that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described, but can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/070,365, entitled “3D STACKED IMAGE SENSOR”, which was filed on Nov. 1, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5056064 | Iwahashi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5541654 | Roberts | Jul 1996 | A |
5565915 | Kindo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5935236 | Wakimoto | Aug 1999 | A |
5955753 | Takahashi | Sep 1999 | A |
6339363 | Fowler | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6459078 | Fowler | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6887769 | Kellar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6960757 | Merrill et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984816 | Holm et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7115925 | Rhodes | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7635880 | Toros et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7638749 | Fowler | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7764396 | Yu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7781716 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791192 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7800145 | Toros et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8445828 | He | May 2013 | B2 |
8460794 | Zheng et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20030137594 | Koizumi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040227109 | Storm et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050068838 | Kono et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050128324 | Kishi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050205761 | Shah | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050274873 | Liu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070132867 | Rhee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070189071 | Vali et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205495 | Fernandez et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080043128 | Poonnen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080083939 | Guidash | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080246869 | Krymski | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090091648 | Lin et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096890 | Li | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090184349 | Dungan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189057 | Asaba et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090230287 | Anderson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090294813 | Gambino | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100060764 | McCarten | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110156195 | Tivarus | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157398 | Okita et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157445 | Itonaga et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120002092 | Guidash | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019828 | McCaffrey | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120091551 | Marenco | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120147237 | Xu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130134295 | Yan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130320194 | Chen | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140027640 | Yang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140042298 | Wan | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140042299 | Wan et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140077057 | Chao | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104469 | Kim | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140211056 | Fan | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140264683 | Kao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150122971 | He | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101193203 | Jun 2008 | CN |
1052846 | Nov 2000 | EP |
200917827 | Apr 2009 | TW |
WO-2007136764 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2009035785 | Mar 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,905, filed May 21, 2013, He. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,365, filed Nov. 1, 2013, He. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/075,430, filed Nov. 8, 2013, He. |
Jimmin Chang, A.A. Abidi, and C.R. Viswanathan, “Flicker noise in CMOS transistors from subthreshold to strong inversion at various temperatures”, IEEE Trans. On Electron Devices, vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 1965-1971, Nov. 1994. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150124135 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14070365 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 14109834 | US |