Shared sheath digital transport termination cable

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6566606
  • Patent Number
    6,566,606
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 31, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 20, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A telecommunications cable includes multiple binder units. Each binder unit includes a predetermined number of twisted pairs enclosed by a binder unit wrap. A foil free edge tape is applied over the top of the unit wrap with the foil facing inwardly. A drain wire is pulled between the foil and the unit wrap. A preselected number of binder units are enclosed by an overall core wrap, and a shield is applied over the top of the overall core wrap such that the shield surface faces inwardly for improved termination methods. An overall drain wire is placed between the overall core and overall shield. The entire cable may be enclosed by a jacket or sheath.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a cable made of twisted wire pairs, and more particularly, to a cable made of twisted wire pairs that is suitable for use in high-speed data communication applications.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Twisted pair telecommunication wires are bundled together in large cables. Typically, 50 or more pairs of wire are included in a typical cable configuration near its termination point. However, cables coming out of a central telecommunications location may have hundreds or even thousands of pairs bundled together. In operation, each twisted pair within the cable is utilized for transmitting data as well as for furnishing direct current (DC) power to remote equipment. With signal multiplexing, a single twisted pair may service multiple data signals and multiple end users, reducing the number of individual pairs required for a desired level of service and reducing the distance between an access point and a final subscriber.




Recently, demands upon telecommunication systems have greatly increased. With the explosive growth of the Internet, consumers and telecommunication companies alike are seeking new methods for high speed data transmission. In particular, telecommunication companies and other entities are developing methods for supporting digital communication circuits at increased speed and/or distances than have existed in the past. For example, new methods for supporting digital communication circuits at increased speed and/or distance include, but are not limited to, DS1/1C/2, ADSL, SDSL, HDSL, and VDSL. In addition, telecommunication companies and other entities are developing these new methods for use over the existing telephone wiring infrastructure, which is generally composed of twisted pair wires bundled as cables strung over relatively long distances.




In general, wire pairs are twisted to minimize the interference of signals from one pair to another caused by radiation or capacitive coupling between the pairs. When a signal is present on a twisted pair, a state known as “active,” the twisted pair naturally creates an electromagnetic field around it. The electromagnetic field thus generated may induce a signal in other twisted pairs located within the electromagnetic field. Additionally, a field generated by one active twisted pair can interfere with the operation of other active pairs located in close proximity to the first pair. As a result, signals transmitted in one pair may generate “noise” within adjoining pairs, thereby degrading or attenuating the signal in the adjoining pairs. This coupling, known as “crosstalk,” worsens as data transmission frequencies and data transmission length increase.




With the emerging deployment of the various high speed digital transport systems and services, the shortcomings of the existing and deployed twisted pair communications cables are quickly being apparent. Emerging methods of supporting digital communication circuits, described above, rely upon using increased data transmission frequencies over long distances. For example, normal voice transmissions transmitted over telephone wires occur in a frequency range from greater than 0 to 4 kHz, while DSL applications typically transmit in a frequency range from greater than 0 to about 100 kHz over distances between 12,000 and 18,000 feet. As can be appreciated, emerging digital communications methods are highly prone to error due to crosstalk between pairs within the cable, between adjoining cables, and from outside interference, especially at the point where the incoming signal is interfaced to transport equipment such as a modem.




Typically, existing twisted pair cables attempt to isolate outside interference and crosstalk by using a common shield within the cable and by grounding the shield at a termination point. Alternatively, if multiple shields are used, existing cables fail to isolate various shields within a cable, such that the multiple shields within a cable electrically communicate with each other, especially after prolonged use. Specifically, if a telecommunications cable includes an overall shield surrounding a unit shield, the overall shield may electrically communicate with the unit shield, or else electrical interaction may occur due to shield shorts for pinholes in any insulation. Moreover, typical telecommunications cables currently in use terminate the overall shield by drawing out a drain wire and simply clamping it to ground. Unfortunately, grounding the drain wire usually causes it to act as an antenna that draws interference into the cable from outside sources.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A cable for supporting digital communication circuits and increased speed and/or distances is disclosed. The cable design employs multiple binder units, each binder unit comprising a predetermined number of twisted pairs. Each binder unit is enclosed by a binder core wrap. The binder core wrap is enclosed by a foil free edge tape applied with the foil facing inwardly and a drain wire pulled between the foil and the core wrap. A preselected number of binder units further comprise a cable. The preselected number of binder units are enclosed by an overall core wrap, and a unit shield is applied over the top of the overall core wrap such that the shield surface faces inwardly for improved termination to ground. An overall drain wire is placed between the overall core wrap and overall shield. Finally, the entire cable may be enclosed by a jacket or sheath.




In the cable of the present invention, the overall shield is isolated from the unit shields, and each shield may be terminated to ground independently of the other. In this way, the inner binder units are isolated from outside interference, e.g., from other adjacent cables. The shields are also isolated from contacting each other or from contacting individual wires or wire pairs, by the overall core wrap, thereby preventing shorts or signal loss through pinholes in the twisted pair insulation.




Moreover, both the overall shield and the unit shield are applied with the foil side inwardly oriented. This arrangement allows the foil to be folded back over the cable and the binder unit, respectively, and terminated using a simple grounding clamp, rather than by grounding the drain wire as is currently the practice. By clamping the shields instead of the drain wire, shielding performance is enhanced because the drain wires are not able to act as an antenna and draw interference into the cable.




By separating the twisted pair wires into manageably sized binder units, convenience and efficiency of use is enhanced. For example, separate digital services may be provided through each of the binder units based upon the frequency spectrum within which they operate. Alternatively, one binder unit may be used as a “send” unit, while an adjacent binder unit may be designated the “receive” units. By separating “send” and “receive” functions between binder units, rather than simply between twisted pairs within a single unit, local crosstalk is minimized, leading to increased transmission distances.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to one of ordinary skill and art from the detailed description of the invention that follows and from the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a cross sectional view of a binder unit constructed according to the present invention; and





FIG. 2

is a cross sectional view of a cable constructed according to the present invention.





FIG. 3

is a perspective view of a shield tape according to the present invention.





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of an alternative shield tape configuration according to the present invention.





FIG. 5

is a perspective view of the cable of

FIG. 2

with terminating the overall shield according to a method of the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a perspecitve view of the cable of

FIG. 2

with terminating the binder unit shield according to a method of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




With reference to

FIG. 1

, a plurality of twisted wire pairs


10


comprise a binder unit


12


for inclusion into a transport cable. Under the present invention, the number of twisted wire pairs


10


is predetermined by the manufacturer of the binder unit


12


, but in practice it has been found that 25 pairs of #24 AWG insulated copper wires may easily be combined into a single binder unit


12


. The twisted wire pairs


10


are bundled together and wrapped with a standard unit wrap


14


to form a bound core


16


of the binder unit


12


. The unit wrap


14


may comprise a polyester film, or other material known in the art. Preferably, the unit wrap


14


comprises a 2 mil thick polyester film of the type well known in the art. A unit drain wire


18


is placed adjacent the exterior


20


of the unit wrap


14


, and is then wrapped in a binder unit shield


22


. Preferably, after placement of the unit drain wire


18


, a foil free edge tape


24


is helically wound about the bound core


16


and the unit drain wire


18


. If the foil free edge tape


24


is helically wound about the bound core


16


, then the unit wrap


14


is also applied in a helical fashion.




As shown in

FIGS. 1 and 3

, the foil free edge tape


24


includes two surfaces. An outer surface


26


of the tape


24


is an exposed non-conductive material such as an appropriate polymer or plasticized material of the type well-known in the art. An inner surface


28


of the tape


24


includes a conductive foil surface


30


. The foil surface


30


extends the full longitudinal length of the tape


24


and is of a predetermined thickness, but preferably extends less than the full width of the tape


24


, making the longitudinal edges of the tape “foil free.” In one embodiment, a portion of the non-conductive material remains exposed on the inner surface


28


of the tape


24


adjacent the foil surface


30


. Preferably, the exposed non-conductive material is coated with an adhesive of the type known in the art. As best seen in

FIG. 3

, the foil surface


30


of the inner surface


28


of the tape


24


is most preferably centered between the longitudinal sides


32


,


34


of the tape


24


such that exposed portions


40


,


42


remain between the longitudinal sides


32


,


34


of the tape


24


and the respective longitudinal sides


36


,


38


of the foil surface


30


. Distances D


1


and D


2


define the extent of the foil free edge of the tape


24


. In the most preferred embodiment, the distances D


1


and D


2


, measured between respective tape longitudinal sides


32


,


34


and foil surface longitudinal sides


36


,


38


, are identical, but they need not be. As in a previous embodiment, the exposed portions


40


,


42


are coated with an adhesive


44


capable of forming a bond between a respective exposed portion


40


,


42


and the outer surface


26


of the tape


24


.




When the foil free edge tape


24


is helically wound about the bound core


16


and the unit drain wire


18


, the helical spacing of the foil free edge tape is such that the first longitudinal side


36


of the foil surface


30


is wound substantially adjacent the second longitudinal side


38


of the foil surface


30


on successive winds. As seen in

FIG. 1

, the foil surface may even overlap slightly about the circumference of the bound core


16


. However, the leading edge exposed tape portion


40


, including the adhesive


44


, contacts the exterior surface


20


of the unit wrap


14


, while the trailing-edge exposed tape portion


42


, including the adhesive


44


, contacts the outer surface


26


of the tape


24


of the preceding wind. In this way, the tape


24


is secured both to the unit wrap


14


and to adjacent winds of the tape, thereby preventing migration of the tape or gaps between successive winds when the binder unit


12


is flexed or moved. Moreover, because the tape portions


40


,


42


do not include foil, no part of the foil surface


30


is exposed on the exterior


46


of the shield tape.




In another embodiment, shown in

FIG. 4

, the tape


24


′ may be formed of a single long strip of polymeric material having a width W that is slightly larger than the circumference C of the exterior surface


20


of the unit wrap


14


. The foil surface


30


′ of the tape


24


′ has a width W


1


that is substantially equal to the circumference C of the exterior surface


20


of the unit wrap


14


while accommodating the insertion of the drain wire


18


. The remaining width (W−W


1


) of the inner surface


28


′ of the tape


24


′ defines an exposed portion


40


′ that includes an adhesive


44


′. Instead of being helically wound about the exterior of the unit wrap


14


and the unit drain wire


18


, the width W of tape


24


′ is wrapped circumferentially about the binder unit


12


and the drain wire


18


such that first and second longitudinal surfaces


32


′,


34


′ meet along the axial length of the binder unit


12


. In this embodiment, if the tape


24


′ is wrapped circumferencially about the binder unit


12


, then the unit wrap


14


′ is comprised of an elongated strip of polyester film that is wrapped circumferentially along the longitudinal length of the twisted pairs.




The exposed portion


40


′, including the adhesive


44


′, then overlaps a portion of the tape outer surface


26


′, thereby sealing the core wrap within the tape


24


. As shown in

FIG. 4

, the inner surface


28


′ of the tape


24


′ may include opposing exposed portions


42


′,


44


′ including an adhesive so that one longitudinal edge of the tape


24


′ may be affixed to the outer surface


20


of the unit wrap


14


if desired. In this way, none of the foil surface


30


remains exposed on the exterior of the completed binder unit


12


.




A cable


50


formed from multiple binder units


12


is shown in FIG.


2


. In

FIG. 2

, only three binder units are combined to form bound core


48


of the cable


50


, but it should be understood that the number of binder units


12


to be combined in a single cable


50


is limited only by spatial constraints and convenience. Each binder unit is constructed as described above, and is placed within a cable having an overall shield


52


that encircles the bound core


48


and all of the binder units


12


. To ensure that no electrical interaction occurs between the overall shield


52


and the shield


22


of each binder unit


12


, an outer core wrap


54


is formed about the exterior of the combined bound core


48


using conventionally available methods and materials, such as a polyester film similar to the unit wrap


14


, or other materials. The cable


50


will be subject to flex over time, which may open gaps in the tape


24


of each binder unit


12


. Without the outer core wrap


54


, tape gaps would potentially cause contact between the overall shield


52


and the shield


22


of each binder unit


12


over time as the cable


50


is flexed. Thus, the outer core wrap


54


is an added precaution to enhance isolation of each binder unit


12


. An overall shield drain wire


56


is placed between the outer core wrap


54


and the overall shield


52


. In one embodiment, the overall shield


52


is a conventionally available foil shield. In another embodiment, the overall shield


52


is a braided shield of the type conventionally known. However, in the preferred embodiment, the overall shield


52


is comprised of a combination foil and braid to provide the greatest amount of shielding. Finally, a conventional cable jacket or sheath


58


is applied over the entire length of the cable


50


.




Referring now to

FIG. 5

, because the overall shield


52


is isolated from the unit shields


22


, the overall shield


52


may be terminated to ground independently of the individual unit shields


22


, thereby protecting the inner binder units


12


from outside interference, for example, from other adjacent cables. Moreover, the overall shield


52


is preferably applied with the foil side in facing contact with the outer surface of the outer core wrap


54


. This arrangement allows the foil to be folded back over the jacket


58


and terminated using a simple grounding clamp, rather than by grounding the drain wire as is currently the practice. By clamping the overall shield


52


instead of the drain wire


56


, shielding performance is enhanced because the drain wire


56


is not able to act as an antenna and draw interference into the cable. Similarly, the foil surface


30


of the foil free edge tape


24


applied to each binder unit


12


is separated from the twisted pairs


10


by the unit wrap


14


. The unit wrap


14


offers the benefits of isolating the twisted pair conductors from the foil surface


30


, thereby preventing shorts or signal loss through pinholes in the twisted pair insulation.




Like the overall shield


52


, each binder unit shield


22


may be terminated independently to ground, thereby providing protection against binder unit to binder unit crosstalk within the cable, as shown in FIG.


6


. In fact, because of the foil free edge tape arrangement, only a minimal amount of shield


22


need be removed for termination. In practice, when an installer or end user is attaching the cable to various contact points, including to ground, the installer may optionally apply a separate appropriately sized tube of a known, shrink-wrap material, around the outside of each binder unit


12


. However, a short length, on the order of two to three inches, of the binder unit is left exposed by the installer on each end of the binder unit


12


. The foil free edge tape


24


is then stripped back to the edge of the tube and is terminated using a grounding clamp or by clamping a connector over the shield, as for example, a 50-pin connector ground. The shrink wrap tube prevents further unwinding of the foil free edge tape


24


, and ensures that the cable of the present invention retains its intended dimensional shape. The twisted pairs within the unit may then be connected conventionally to either a termination point, such as a punch-down block, or to the 50-pin connector. In either case, only a minimal amount of each twisted pair is exposed outside of the shield. Because the twisted pairs are surrounded by the unit wrap


14


, the shield


22


is isolated from the twisted pairs


10


, minimizing the impedance mismatch between the minimally exposed end portions of each twisted pair


10


and the unexposed portions of the twisted pairs. Finally, application of the outermost shrink wrap tube over the shield


22


stabilizes the binder unit, preventing distortion of the binder unit


12


under flex or torsional forces.




Using the cable


50


manufactured according to the present invention, separate digital services may be provided through each of the binder units based upon the frequency spectrum within which they operate. Alternatively, one binder unit may be used as a “send” unit, while an adjacent binder unit may be designated the “receive” units. By separating “send” and “receive” functions between binder units, rather than simply between twisted pairs within a single unit, local crosstalk is minimized, leading to increased transmission distances.




Although certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described, the invention is not limited to the illustrations described and shown herein, which are deemed to be merely illustrative of the best modes of carrying out the invention. A person of ordinary skill in the art will realize that certain modifications will come within the teachings of this invention and that such modifications are within its spirit and the scope as defined by the claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for minimizing crosstalk within a telecommunications cable, comprising the steps of:wrapping a plurality of twisted wire pairs with a unit wrap; placing a unit drain wire adjacent an outer surface of the unit wrap; wrapping the unit wrap and the unit drain wire with a binder unit shield to form a binder unit; wrapping one or more the binder units with an outer core wrap; placing an overall shield drain wire adjacent an outer surface of the outer core wrap; enclosing the one or more wrapped binder units and the overall shield drain wire with an overall shield having an inner surface of conductive material contacting the outer surface of the outer core wrap and the overall shield drain wire; enclosing the overall shield with a jacket; and grounding the cable by folding the overall shield back over the jacket, thereby minimizing crosstalk within the telecommunications cable.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the binder unit shield comprises a foil free edge tape having an inner surface of conductive material and an outer surface of non-conductive material, the inner surface of conductive material contacting an outer surface of the unit wrap and the unit drain wire.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2, further comprising the step of grounding each binder unit shield, thereby minimizing binder unit to binder unit crosstalk within the telecommunications cable.
  • 4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the foil free edge tape is helically wrapped around the unit wrap and the drain wire.
  • 5. The method according to claim 2, wherein the foil free edge tape is circumferentially wrapped around the unit wrap and the drain wire.
  • 6. A method for minimizing crosstalk within a telecommunications cable, comprising the steps of:wrapping a plurality of twisted wire pairs with a unit wrap; placing a unit drain wire adjacent an outer surface of the unit wrap; wrapping the unit wrap and a drain wire with a binder unit shield comprising a foil free edge tape having an inner surface of conductive material and an outer surface of non-conductive material to form a binder unit; wrapping the one or more binder units with an outer core wrap; placing an overall shield drain wire adjacent an outer surface of the outer core wrap; enclosing the one or more wrapped binder units and the overall shield drain wire with an overall shield; enclosing the overall shield with a jacket; and grounding each binder unit shield, thereby minimizing binder unit to binder unit crosstalk within the cable.
  • 7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the overall shield has an inner surface of conductive material contacting an outer surface of the outer core wrap and the overall shield drain wire.
  • 8. The method according to claim 7, further comprising the step of grounding the cable by folding the overall shield back over the jacket, thereby enhancing shielding performance of the cable.
  • 9. The method according to claim 6, wherein the foil free edge tape is helically wrapped around the unit wrap and the drain wire.
  • 10. The method according to claim 6, wherein the foil free edge tape is circumferentially wrapped around the unit wrap and the drain wire.
US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
3576939 Ziemek May 1971 A
3643007 Roberts et al. Feb 1972 A
4096346 Stine et al. Jun 1978 A
4150249 Pedersen Apr 1979 A
4510346 Bursh, Jr. et al. Apr 1985 A
4691081 Gupta et al. Sep 1987 A
5008490 Strauss et al. Apr 1991 A
5061827 Grabbe Oct 1991 A
5107076 Bullock et al. Apr 1992 A
5216202 Yoshida et al. Jun 1993 A
5473117 Morgan et al. Dec 1995 A
5530203 Adams et al. Jun 1996 A
5767442 Eisenberg et al. Jun 1998 A
5834699 Buck et al. Nov 1998 A
5956445 Deitz, Sr. et al. Sep 1999 A
6010788 Kebabjian et al. Jan 2000 A