This invention relates generally to the provision of cellular services and specifically to the accommodation of multiple service providers from a single cellular tower.
In the provision of wireless communication services within a cellular network, individual geographic areas or “cells” are serviced by one or more base stations. A base station has at least one cellular tower associated therewith, utilizing RF antennas which communicate with a plurality of remote devices, such as cellular phones and paging devices. The tower is then linked with other facilities of the service provider, including a switching office, for handling and processing the wireless communication traffic. The tower might be coupled to the switching office through land lines, or alternatively, the signals might be transmitted or backhauled through microwave backhaul antennas. Another tower might also be involved for delivering the wireless traffic to the switching office or another site. Generally, a tower will have various RF antennas and microwave backhaul antennas associated with each of the different wireless service providers, such as AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, and others having coverage for the area where the tower is located. As may be appreciated, each cellular tower generally accommodates a plurality of RF and/or microwave backhaul antennas.
Traditionally, cellular base stations and towers were owned and operated by the service providers. However, today, such towers are owned by third-party companies who are driven to operate the towers as efficiently and profitably as possible. To that end, and to maximize profits, cellular towers often accommodate multiple service providers desiring coverage in a geographic area. However, there are physical capacity limits for cellular towers which limit the capacity of the towers in handling all of the equipment for all possible service providers. Specifically, a greater number of service providers for a cell or cell sector has translated into additional equipment being loaded onto the tower. However, the physical tower loading must remain within desired parameters for the integrity of the tower.
For example, on a typical cellular tower, multiple providers (Q) each might have sets of 6–9 RF link antennas on a single tower. Such antennas, in addition to their own weight, each require Q×(6–9) cables. In addition to the RF link antennas, there will often be multiple microwave backhaul antennas (P), directed at various orientations around a 360° axis, adding not only additional antenna weight, but also requiring P additional cables or waveguides hanging from the tower. Adding additional service providers and the hardware associated therewith, will therefore, tax the tower to its physical capacity. Furthermore, weight is not the only concern, as the antennas and cables increase wind resistance for towers that must withstand 60 mile/hour winds. Still further, ice on the various antenna hardware and cables will further increase physical strain on a tower. Therefore, the physical capacity of the tower currently limits the ability to serve every interested service provider, and therefore limits the revenue of the tower owners in selling their tower space to service providers.
Simply building more towers is not a desirable solution. In addition to the cost to build and maintain the tower, communities are starting to vigorously protest the location of such towers due to their unsightly addition to the landscape. This is particularly so in densely populated areas where more towers might be needed or coverage is particularly desired by the service provider.
Another revenue limiting issue for tower owners is that there is only one tower top. The most desirable position for a service provider is to be operating from RF link or microwave backhaul antennas positioned at or very close to the top of the tower. The highest amount of revenue, or tower rent fees, for a tower operator is generated by those service providers using equipment at the top of the tower. Those service providers with equipment located below the tower top, understandably, will only pay lesser fees.
Another particular concern for service providers is the shape and direction of their signal beams. Different providers have different demands, thus putting a further burden on tower owners. While tower owners may provide specific beams to a service provider, such an option is often expensive, and will usually require additional equipment on the tower for that specific service provider. Furthermore, offering the service to one tower customer creates a desire by other tower customers, requiring even more equipment and expense to maintain the customers.
Consequently, tower operators have various factors to consider as they sell their tower services to wireless service providers. Traditionally, the tower operators have worked to sell their tower space and to put as much equipment on a tower as they could physically accommodate. The tower owners would like to have every possible service provider on their towers. Of course, every service provider will want the tower top location and will want special considerations, such as specific beam shapes or directions. As such, there exists a tension in the tower market due to limitations in the current technology which limits not only the revenues of the tower owner but also the benefits to be received by a service provider.
Therefore, it is desirable for a tower operator to increase revenues by accommodating every potential service provider customer on the tower.
It is further desirable, both from a revenue standpoint for the tower owner and a performance standpoint for the service provider, to have all service providers located at the tower top.
In addition to accommodating all of the service providers, the tower owner also wants to be able to meet the specific performance criteria of each of their potential service provider customers, including beam considerations, in order to entice them to purchase the services of the tower owner.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The invention addresses the above-noted desires and needs in the art and provides a system for accommodating multiple service providers on a single tower. While the invention described herein is described in connection with various preferred embodiments, it is understood that the invention is not limited to those particular embodiments. Rather, the description of the invention is intended to cover various alternatives, modifications, and equivalent arrangements as may be included within the scope of the invention as defined by the application.
The present invention relates to the concept of sharing a cellular tower among multiple service providers, while providing those service providers with tower top locations for their equipment, as well as tailored beams for their signals. Such a concept is applicable to the RF link systems on a tower, as well as the microwave backhaul systems on the same tower. The system allows for maximizing revenue for a tower owner while providing desirable performance characteristics for a wireless service provider.
Tower 10 includes one or more sets of RF link antennas, 12a, 12b, and 12c (corresponding to the multiple service providers on the tower) for providing the wireless communication link between the base station of tower 10 and a plurality of remote devices, such as cellular phones, pagers, and other wireless devices. Also associated with the tower are one or more backhaul antennas, or sets of antennas, indicated by reference numerals 14a, 14b, and 14c, which provide microwave backhaul of the communication signals, such as to a switching office for a service provider, or to another tower. The tower will usually include one or more land lines (not shown) such as for communication with the switching office or a remote location. Also associated with tower 10, but not shown in the drawings, are base station electronics, usually located at the base of the tower, which encompass any of the electronics not included at the antennas or up on the tower for processing wireless communications. Cables running from the various RF link antennas 12a–12c and microwave backhaul antennas 14a–14c run down to the electronics at the base of the tower and, as noted above, add to the weight and complexity of the tower equipment. Any additional equipment added to tower 10 diminishes the future capacity of the tower.
An RF link system 12a will include sets of RF antennas 16 with each set facing a portion or sector of a cell associated with tower 10. In
The microwave backhaul antennas 14a–14c are illustrated as being directed in various different directions. In that way, the microwave backhaul signals are sent to multiple points from the single tower point to backhaul signals to those multiple points, such as multiple switching offices, or to other towers. Tower 10 and the associated RF link and microwave backhaul will generally operate within allocated frequency bands which are recognized or authorized by governmental bodies such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), or any similar foreign counterparts, such as the European Telecommunications Standardization Institute (ETSI) in Europe, which are intended for use for wireless and microwave communications. Similarly, the present invention is directed for operation in various conventional wireless and microwave bands used for RF links and microwave backhaul.
Each individual RF sector antenna 24 provides multiple and simultaneous individual signal beams in the sector for each individual service provider using the array. That is, the beams provided for each service provider are specifically tailored according to the direction and performance criteria set forth by that service provider in accordance with another invention aspect. Additionally, and in accordance with still another aspect of the present invention, digital beam steering is provided so that each service provider has flexibility with respect to their multiple beams for all sectors serviced by the tower 10a. By providing multiple, individually-steered beams for each service provider, the carrier to interference (C/I) performance criteria for the service provider is improved. The present invention offers such performance improvement for each individual service provider.
Similarly, the array 22 of microwave backhaul sector antennas 26 provides multiple, simultaneous beams in each sector in different directions which provide the desired point-to-multipoint characteristics which are necessary for the microwave backhaul signals to reach the various locations remote from the tower (e.g., switching offices, other cell towers, etc.). Digital beam steering is also provided for the microwave backhaul beams of each service provider and each sector antenna 26 to provide flexibility in the microwave backhaul operation. The present invention not only allows a greater number of providers access to a particular tower without physically overloading the tower, but as mentioned above, it also provides every service provider the top location on the tower. This is extremely desirable for both the tower operator and service provider. Furthermore, the sharing of the array of sector antennas for both the RF links and the microwave backhaul reduces the operation costs for the operator, because such costs are spread out over a greater number of service providers. Furthermore, the present invention allows the use of lower capacity tower structures by reducing the large amount of hardware required to accommodate each of the numerous service providers using the tower.
System 40, as shown in
Utilizing an array of elements, a beam, or preferably a number of beams, may be formed having a desired shape and direction. Beamforming with an array antenna is a known technique. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the beam or beams formed by antenna 42 are digitally adapted for a desired shape, elevation and azimuth, as desired by each individual service provider utilizing the shared tower system of the invention. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the antenna 42 is driven to adaptively and selectively steer the beams as necessary for the service provider.
In beamforming, according to the invention, individually manipulating the signals to each array element 44 allows beam steering in both azimuth and elevation. Alternatively, azimuth beam steering may be more desirable than elevation beam steering, and therefore individual signals to columns 1–M are manipulated, that is the individual columns are manipulated to provide a beam which may be steered in azimuth while generally having a fixed elevation. The present invention utilizes the aspects of such digital beam steering for the desired results within the shared tower system.
Referring again to
The embodiment illustrated in
Coupled to the antenna 42 is frequency converter circuitry 50 which has the necessary modulation and demodulation circuitry for upconverting and downconverting the antenna signals of the elements 44. For an RF link, the antenna signals at the antenna will be within a defined RF communication frequency band, such as a PCS 1900, or a cellular 800 band. Those RF signals are associated with up-conversion (Tx) or down conversion (Rx) and one or more intermediate frequencies (IF) through the frequency converter circuitry 50. Similarly, for microwave backhaul, the antenna signals are in microwave frequency band, and are converted between that frequency band and one or more IF frequencies.
Returning to
The signals associated with the antenna 42 are referred to herein as “antenna signals,” and they are of a form for transmitting and receiving information through the antenna 42. After or before the antenna signals are frequency converted, the signals are referred to generally as IF signals to distinguish them from the RF or microwave antenna signals. The nomenclature utilized is not to any way to limit the invention, but rather, is used to refer to the signals at different stages of their processing.
The resulting IF signals from the converted frequency band are further converted to digital IF. Digital conversion circuitry 56 converts the signals between IF signals and digital signals within what is referred to herein as a defined digital band corresponding to the entire RF or microwave communication frequency band in one aspect of the invention. The digitized IF signals are often referred to as digital IF. The digital conversion circuitry 56 converts the signals to be further digitally signal processed for interfacing with a service provider, as discussed further hereinbelow. The entire communication frequency band is converted and represented in the converted digital IF band. Illustrated in
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the digital signal processing circuitry 70 for a plurality (T) of service providers, is operable to process and provide the signals associated with the service provider for the purposes of wireless communication. The digital signal processing circuitry 70, for example, will provide the desired modulation and demodulation associated with the service provider. The digital signal processing circuitry 70 is also operable to define an individual beam, or multiple individual beams, simultaneously for each individual service provider, utilizing an antenna array 20, 22. The antenna is thereby digitally driven or executed to define and steer the beams of the service provider. Accordingly, in accordance with one aspect of the present invention, each digital signal provider has its own set of beams, which may be configured to point in various different directions generally unrelated to the beams of another service provider utilizing the same antenna array. As such, the present invention customizes the antenna array 20, 22 for each service provider. This is extremely desirable for both the service provider and the entity owning and operating the tower. A single array is used for all providers, and all providers have the tower top location.
Referring to
Referring to
Such features of the invention are certainly desirable in an RF link sector antenna wherein the beams may be selectively directed for an improved C/I ratio. Similarly, for a microwave backhaul application, the invention provides multiple simultaneous beams in different directions for point-to-multipoint operation, thereby eliminating the need for multiple microwave backhaul antenna structures pointing in various different directions around the tower. Still further, in accordance with another aspect of the invention, the invention would be utilized for both the RF link system and/or the microwave backhaul system for a provider.
Referring again to
An antenna signal in a communication frequency band and associated with column 1 passes through a frequency multiplexor 90 which operates at one or more desired communication frequency bands, such as, for example, a PCS 1900 band, or a cellular 800 band. Through the frequency multiplexor 90, the receive signal 92 and transmit signal 94 are separated or joined to be individually processed or transmitted, as is conventional. Turning to the receive signal 92, the signal passes through a suitable amplifier, such as an LNA 96, and is split by a splitter 98 to provide signals for a series of K bandpass filters 100, indicated as F1–FK. The bandpass filters 100 divide the frequency communication band into a number of smaller bands or band portions for frequency conversion rather than a frequency conversion of the entire frequency band as noted above. Frequency converter circuitry, designated generally as 50, includes a plurality of mixers 102 driven by an LO synthesizer 104 for downconverting portions of the band from microwave or RF frequencies to IF. Controls (not shown) might be used to control the LO synthesizer and the other frequency conversion circuitry. As discussed hereinabove, the antenna utilized might be a distributed active antenna where the array elements, frequency multiplexor, and amplifiers are incorporated into a single antenna, as indicated by bracket 42. Alternatively, the antenna may be a passive antenna wherein the multiplexing, amplification, and frequency conversion circuitry are located elsewhere, such as at the base of the tower, or removed from the antenna as discussed further hereinbelow with respect to
The receive signal 92, and specifically the multiple band portions 100, are digitally converted through a series of A/D converters 106 (e.g. 41 MSPS, 12–14 bit) after being downconverted in band portions from the RF or microwave frequency communication band. The resulting groups of digital IF signals 103, are multiplexed by a digital multiplexor 108 and converted for digital transmission on fiber optic cable by a digital-to-fiber converter 60 as discussed with respect to
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4845504 | Roberts et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5023866 | De Muro | Jun 1991 | A |
5590415 | Peltola et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5646942 | Oliver et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5666365 | Kostreski | Sep 1997 | A |
5680142 | Smith et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689245 | Noreen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5745841 | Reudink et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5781865 | Gammon | Jul 1998 | A |
5854611 | Gans et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854986 | Dorren et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5872547 | Martek | Feb 1999 | A |
5880701 | Bhame et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884147 | Reudink et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889494 | Reudink et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5929823 | Martek et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937019 | Padovani | Aug 1999 | A |
5946622 | Bojeryd | Aug 1999 | A |
5969689 | Martek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991628 | Pedziwiatr et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6055230 | Feuerstein et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6070090 | Feuerstein | May 2000 | A |
6150984 | Suguro et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157847 | Buehrer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173189 | Lockhart | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181276 | Schlekewey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181955 | Dartois | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188373 | Martek | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188912 | Struhsaker et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195556 | Reudink et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198434 | Martek et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198435 | Reudink et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233466 | Wong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236849 | Reudink et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236866 | Meyer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246674 | Feuerstein et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252867 | Pfeil et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6289221 | Ritter | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295026 | Chen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297711 | Seward et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317100 | Elson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323823 | Wong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324405 | Young et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336033 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351654 | Huang et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360094 | Satarasinghe | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366789 | Hildebrand | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377819 | Gesbert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6658263 | Ke et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
20010012788 | Gammon | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020008577 | Cova et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 639 035 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0 878 974 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1 111 821 | Jun 2001 | EP |
2 320 618 | Jun 1998 | GB |
9-98018 | Aug 1997 | JP |
WO 9744914 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9839851 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 0003479 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0106801 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0219470 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02039541 | May 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030032424 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |