This invention relates to an improved power driven sharpening apparatus for knife edges and edges of metal cutting tools.
There have been a wide range of devices and mechanisms for sharpening the edge of knives and cutting tools both manual and power driven. A number of these have been the subject of patents by this inventor including U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,627,194, 4,716,689, 4,807,399, 4,897,965, 6,113,476, and 6,012,971. These describe sharpeners capable of creating very sharp edges. The perfection and effectiveness of the final edge is in each case limited by the design of the final sharpening stage.
The invention relates to an improved design of a powered finishing stage that creates an exceedingly sharp and effective edge by minimizing the size of the burr resulting from the abrading actions during the metal removal process. The invention involves novel means that make it possible to use effectively abrasives of exceedingly small grit size in the finishing stage of powered sharpeners.
The process of sharpening a cutting edge commonly involves a series of abrading steps. First the faces of the knife immediately adjacent to the edge must be beveled on each side of the cutting edge by removing material at some selected angle α relative to the center plane of the blade faces. Most knives are made of metal. As metal is removed on each face at the selected angle α, facets are formed along the edge of the blade which intersect each other at the edge at a total angle of 2 α. As these facets are created, the material removal process along the last-to-be-created (abraded) facet creates along the edge a burr which is bent away from the abrading mechanism in the direction of the adjacent facet as shown in FIG. 1. The creation of the burr results from the fact that the very thin edge being created by the intersection of the facets is unsupported and too thin to physically resist the force being applied by the abrading process. Hence the edge being formed bends away from the abrasive action. The force needed to abrade exceeds the force necessary to bend the edge away from the abrasive. Hence as the abrading force increases the burr becomes larger. Conversely if the abrading force can be reduced the size of the burr will be reduced. Old fashioned power driven sharpening stones that were rigidly mounted on a motor shaft resulted in extremely high forces being applied to the knife edge facets which overheated and gouged the edge and left large burrs and the blade consequently was relatively dull.
The presence of a burr along a cutting edge, reduces greatly the cutting ability of the edge. Consequently it is important to reduce the size of the resulting burr and to reduce the curvature of the burr by altering the sharpening process in a manner that minimizes and limits the force being applied to the blade facets when sharpening.
When metal blades are sharpened by conventional abrading process a burr is virtually always formed along the edge. If more efficient abrasives such as diamonds are used, the magnitude of abrading force that must be applied normal to the facet is reduced as compared to the force necessary to abrade the same amount of metal in unit time from the facet by less effective abrasives such as silicon oxide or silicon carbide. Because the force necessary to abrade is reduced by using more efficient abrasives, the size of the burr can be reduced.
Consequently to reduce the size and extension of the burr one should use an efficient abrasive material, a smaller effective particle size of the grit and apply the lightest possible force normal to the facets during the final abrasive sharpening process before the edge is used for cutting. If a burr of any size remains along the edge, it will be bent over by the forces of cutting with the blade. The larger the burr the easier it can be bent over and folded back against the adjacent edge facet impairing sooner the cutting effectiveness of the edge.
Because of these factors it is important in the finishing step of sharpening to use an exceedingly fine grit but effective abrasive and a very low abrading force normal to the facets. Previous attempts to use lower abrading forces in powered sharpeners have been unsuccessful due to serious mechanical problems that limit the attainable sharpness, damage the edge and destroy the symmetry of the abrasive surface.
The geometry of the finishing apparatus can take many forms, however, this inventor has developed a novel, highly effective, low-cost combination of motor driven disks coated with ultra-fine diamonds where the abrasive coated disks are held by an exceedingly low-force spring action against a positioning stop on a motor driven shaft. The positioning stop serves to locate the surface of the abrasive coated disks immediately adjacent to knife guides positioned and angled so that the edge facets of the knife blades being sharpened contact the abrasive surface of the motor driven rotating spring-loaded disks and displace the disks against the low-force spring while maintaining contact with the abrasive surface of the rotating disk. Consequently the sharpening of the blade facets occurs at a rate controlled and limited by the force of the springs. As the spring force is reduced the size of the resulting burr at the edge of the blade is reduced.
One physical arrangement for a sharpener that has proved effective for sharpening with ultra fine abrasives is shown by way of example in
This mounting and drive mechanism as described above and shown in
The sharpener of
Referring to
While the drive pin must be free to move within slot 10 it was discovered that objectionable vibrations of the hub and disk surface will occur if the width of the hub slot W is much greater than the diameter d of the drive pin 9, of FIG. 8. These vibrations initiate when low force springs are used as the knife is withdrawn and can be sufficiently severe that the disk will not return to its rest position, instead it will continue to resonate as the drive pin 9 impacts alternate sides of the hub slot 10. Because the disk does not properly return to its rest position, the sharpening action is severely compromised.
It was found that the vibration and adverse resonance of the hub and disk could be eliminated by limiting width W (
Because of the exceedingly light force spring used to restore the hub and disk to their rest position there is a tendency of the drive pin as it returns to its rest position to also impact the bottom of the slot with sufficient momentum to set up a resonance in the direction of the axis of the shaft and causes the hub/disk combination to vibrate in and out of the rest position—again interfering with the sharpening action. It was discovered that the magnitude of these vibrations could be reduced by placing filets in the inside corners of the slot curved to match the radius of the drive pin as shown in FIG. 8. This caused the pin to make random contact with a matching contour rather than at a single point along its circumference which helped to break up the tendency to resonate.
Some of the mechanical resonances that gave rise to the bouncing effect of the disks described above have their origin in the non-uniform angular speed of drive motors and the small but excessive instantaneous changes in the torque and speed of the motor as the magnetic poles of the motor armature cross the fixed poles of the motor. This is particularly a problem with inexpensive two pole shaded pole motors widely used in sharpening devices.
These resonances occur also in part because of eccentricities of sharpening disks coupled with any looseness of the displaceable disks on the drive shaft. The disks must be free to move (slide) along the shaft in response when the edge of the knife contacts the abrasive surface of the sharpening disk. The sharpening disk or disks are held in a rest position on the shaft by the force of the restraining spring which pushes the disk to its rest position. The relationship of the locations of the stop-pin on the shaft, the abrasive surface on the disk and the knife guide must be extremely precise in order that when the blade to be sharpened is placed on the knife guide and slid into contact with an appropriate area on the abrasive surface of the disk the rotating disk will be displaced along the motor shaft during the actual sharpening process. This insures that the disk is always displaced somewhat during the sharpening process and the sharpening force on the facet of the blade edge can be controlled primarily by the force of the compression spring.
Because the disk assembly (the disk held by its plastic hub) must slide (be displaced) freely on the motor shaft against the spring force when contacted by the knife edge, there must be sufficient clearance between the cylindrical bore of the hub and the shaft surface to avoid frictional effects that are much greater than the restoring force of the spring. Excessive friction will cause the hub to bend or freeze on the shaft and create excessive forces on the edge of the knife being sharpened and as a result gauge the knife edge, thus destroying the sharp edge being created. When a low force spring, below 0.2 pound, is used in order that the knife edge be abraded very gently, the frictional forces between the hub and shaft must be exceedingly small. However, if the bore size of the hub is increased sufficiently in order to reduce friction to that level that the frictional effects do not interfere with the spring action, mechanical resonances can be created that vibrate the abrading surface and lightly “hammer” the edge being sharpened. The quality and fineness of the edge is adversely deteriorated by the physical resonances that can occur. The optimum clearance between a shaft 3 of 0.2496 inch diameter and the cylindrical bore of the hub 6 was found to be about 0.0009 inch.
The hammering effect that can occur due to these resonances is further exacerbated by the disk runout—namely any imperfections in the symmetry of the disk's abrasive surface relative to its axis of rotation. If the runout is excessive the resonance will be enhanced and the hammering effect can be sufficient to prevent the creation of exceedingly sharp knife edges by the disk sharpening system.
A convenient design for the abrasive disk is a thin adhered layer of abrasive particles, preferably diamonds, on a rigid shaped substrate such as a symmetrical metal disk for example in the shape of a truncated cone. With this design runout of the abrasive surface of the disks can be diminished by “wearing in” the surface abrasive the abrasive surface when the size of the abrasive grit or thickness of abrasive layer is significantly larger than the runout of the metal substrate. In effect initial wear of the abrasive on a disk surface with runout is largely at high spots on the disk surface and by “wearing in” any high spots are lowered which in turn improves the apparent runout of the disk. With a single layer of fine grit sized less than the magnitude of run-out, the amount of “wearing in” of the surface is limited. Hence when using ultra fine grits there is a greater requirement that the initial runout of the disk be exceedingly small. For example, runout of the symmetrically shaped surface in a direction normal to the surface about its axis of rotation is less than ± .006 inches.
Efforts to create stable—non-resonating abrasive disk systems with grit sizes less than 0.002 inch diameter with spring forces less than 0.2 pound and as low as 0.01 pound (0.16 ounce) restoring the disk to its rest positions, driven by conventional low cost motors at about 3000 to 3600 RPM were ineffective if the shaft of the driving motor or the shaft on which the sharpening disks were mounted had an eccentric motion, that is had a wobble or lateral motion of its axis greater than±± 0.006 inch. Such eccentric motion aggravated the resonance especially if the clearance between the drive shaft (0.2496 inch diameter) and the hole in the plastic hub of the disk assembly exceeded 0.0009 inch. The resonance became unacceptable with clearances greater than 0.002 inch if one wished to create exceedingly sharp knives. It was possible in spite of the interaction of such small mechanical imperfections and the difficulty of isolating the cause of damaging resonances to establish the acceptable limits for each type of imperfection as described above.
This application is based upon provisional application Ser. No. 60/418,475, filed Oct. 15, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4627194 | Friel | Dec 1986 | A |
4716689 | Friel | Jan 1988 | A |
4807399 | Friel | Feb 1989 | A |
4897965 | Friel | Feb 1990 | A |
5148634 | Bigliano et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5245789 | Rees et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5390431 | Friel | Feb 1995 | A |
5582535 | Friel | Dec 1996 | A |
5620359 | Harrison et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
6012971 | Friel, Sr. et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6071181 | Wightman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6113476 | Friel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6709320 | Li | Mar 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040077296 A1 | Apr 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60418475 | Oct 2002 | US |