The present invention relates to a shaving device for shaving a skin surface with improved cutting blades and geometry.
In the prior art, the arrangement of the blades within a shaving device has focused on multi-blade razors.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,863,340 teaches a plural edge razor with a lead blade member and a following blade member, wherein the members have unsymmetrical edges hereon and have passages therethrough to facilitate removal of shaving debris from the cutting edge.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,655,030 describes a shaving head with at least a first and second cutting member arranged behind and spaced apart from the first cutting member wherein the cutting angle between the skin contacting surface and the second cutting member is equal or higher than the cutting angle between the skin contacting surface of the first cutting member.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,842,499 refers to a razor blade assembly with one or more groups of multiple cutting edge wherein the group of cutting elements comprises at least two blades with one blade being chisel shaped. This allows a favorable geometry for tandem blade shaving operations.
Improvements are needed in the geometry and interrelationship of the various parts of the razor blade assembly to improve shaving performance. The blades of the prior art, combination with the geometries of the prior art, often tend to disadvantageously ride over the hair without penetrating and cutting through. Due to these drawbacks, a shaving device with an optimized geometrical arrangement allowing a low cutting force and a high cutting efficiency to ensure sufficient safety for the skin is desired.
The present invention is directed to a shaving device for shaving a skin surface including a housing with a skin contacting surface and at least one cutting blade mounted in the housing, wherein the at least one cutting blade has an asymmetric cross-sectional shape with a first face, a second face opposed to the first face as well as a cutting edge at the intersection of the first face and the second face wherein the first face comprises a first surface and a primary bevel with the primary bevel extending from the cutting edge to the first surface, a first intersecting line connecting the primary bevel and the first surface and a first wedge angle θ1 between an imaginary extension of the first surface and the primary bevel and the second face comprises a secondary bevel with the secondary bevel extending from the cutting edge and a second wedge angle θ2 between the first surface and the secondary bevel.
In another aspect, the present invention provides the at least one cutting blade mounted in the housing such that the clearance angle α between the skin contacting surface and the primary bevel or the secondary bevel is ≤11°, the effective cutting angle ε between the skin contacting surface and the bisecting line of the first wedge angle θ1 is ≥10° and θ1>θ2.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which is regarded as forming the present invention, it is believed that the invention will be better understood from the following description which is taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like designations are used to designate substantially identical elements, and in which:
The following reference signs are used in the figures of the present application.
The present invention relates to a shaving device for shaving a skin surface including a housing with a skin contacting surface and at least one cutting blade mounted in the housing, wherein the at least one cutting blade has an asymmetric cross-sectional shape with a first face, a second face opposed to the first face as well as a cutting edge at the intersection of the first face and the second face.
The following definitions are used in the present application:
The dimensions of shaving blade edge profiles and their arrangement in a shaving device are interdependent and are typically optimized to cut hair efficiently. This comprises the following 3 parameters:
These definitions and parameters are illustrated in the figures of the present application.
The first two parameters result in a comfortable shave without tugging on the hairs while they are cut. However, it has been demonstrated the small tip radius of the edge together with a large blade mounting angle, i.e., the clearance angle α, creates a significant pressure onto the skin surface, which is uncomfortable and may even lead to skin being cut. Reducing the effective cutting angle ε improves the safety during shaving. Thus, in this case, conventional symmetric wedge-shaped blades tend to ride over the hair without penetrating and cutting through.
During shaving the rake face interacts with the hair and is primarily responsible for the hair cutting performance while the clearance face interacts with the skin and is primarily responsible for the safety of the skin.
For optimizing the performance of shaving, it is required to increase the safety of a shaving blade by mounting the blade at a small blade mounting angle, i.e., the clearance angle α, so that the skin facing side of the cutting blade (clearance face) lies flat on the skin (low clearance angle) and then modify the blade edge profile so that the cutting efficiency of hairs is not compromised by this small clearance angle α. This means the clearance angle α should be as small as possible to ensure skin safety and the effective cutting angle ε should be as large as possible to efficiently cut through the hair. Hence the clearance angle α plays the role of the safety angle and the effective cutting angle ε plays the role of the efficiency angle.
The clearance angle α and the effective cutting angle ε are related by
ε=α+θ/2
Hence, minimizing the clearance angle α while maintaining an effective cutting angle ε of around 22° as has been used in shaving devices successfully for a long time, requires an increase of the cutting bevel angle θ. However, the force to cut through a hair is determined by the thickness of the cutting blade near to the cutting edge and this thickness increases when the bevel angle θ of the cutting bevel is increased. Hence, increasing the bevel angle θ to maintain the cutting angle ε while reducing the clearance angle α creates a new problem of increasing cutting force and decreasing the shaving comfort due to tugging on the hair, and hence the bevel angle θ plays the role of the comfort angle.
To overcome all these interdependencies and create a cutting edge profile that has a low cutting force (small θ) a high cutting efficiency (large ε) and is safe for the skin (small α) an asymmetric cutting blade profile with at least one additional cutting bevel is disclosed.
The present invention therefore addresses the mentioned drawbacks in the prior art and provides a shaving device with an optimized geometrical setup allowing a low cutting force and a high cutting efficiency and ensuring sufficient safety for the skin.
This problem is solved by the shaving blade with the features of claim 1. The further dependent claims define preferred embodiments of such a blade.
The term “comprising” in the claims and in the description of this application has the meaning that further components are not excluded. Within the scope of the present invention, the term “consisting of” should be understood as preferred embodiment of the term “comprising”. If it is defined that a group “comprises” at least a specific number of components, this should also be understood such that a group is disclosed which “consists” preferably of these components.
In the following, the term “intersecting line” as used herein is understood as the linear extension of an intersecting point (according to a cross-sectional view as in
In the following, the term “cross-sectional” refers to the cross-section perpendicular to the linear extension of the cutting edge.
According to the present invention a shaving device for shaving a skin surface is provided comprising a housing with a skin contacting surface and at least one cutting blade mounted in the housing, wherein the at least one cutting blade has an asymmetric cross-sectional shape with a first face and opposed to the first face a second face as well as a cutting edge at the intersection of the first face and the second face, wherein:
According to the present invention the at least one cutting blade is mounted in the housing that the following conditions are met:
It was surprisingly found that by choosing the conditions as defined above the contradictive effects of a high cutting efficiency on the one hand and a comfortable and safe cutting on the other hand are realized simultaneously.
The at least one cutting blade has an asymmetric cross-sectional shape. The asymmetrical cross-sectional shape refers to the symmetry with respect to an axis which is the bisecting line of (θ1+θ2)/2 and anchored at the cutting edge.
The at least one cutting blade according to the present invention has a low cutting force due to a smaller θ2 while the cutting efficiency is high which is realized by a larger effective cutting angle ε. Moreover, the shaving device has an increased safety of the shaving process due to the small clearance angle α.
Moreover, the primary bevel may have the additional function to strengthen the cutting blade if the primary wedge angle is larger than the secondary wedge angle which allows a mechanical stabilization against damage from the cutting operation which allows a slim blade body in the area of the secondary bevel without affecting the cutting performance of the blade.
The primary bevel with the first wedge angle θ1 has therefore the function of a stabilizing angle of the cutting edge preventing damage to the cutting edge when a hair is being cut, i.e., a bigger wedge angle θ1 increases the mechanical stability of the cutting edge. In consequence, by using a primary bevel with the wedge angle θ1 the second wedge angle θ2 can be reduced.
The wedge angle θ1 has the function to stabilize the cutting edge which allows a slim blade body in the area of the secondary bevel without effecting the cutting performance of the blade. Moreover, the primary bevel with the wedge angle θ1 allows to lift the cutting edge from the object to be cut which makes the cutting step safer, e.g., by raising the distance between skin and cutting edge a cutting into the skin can be avoided.
The second wedge angle θ2 represents the penetration angle of the blade penetrating in the object being cut. The smaller the penetrating angle θ2, the lower the force to penetrate the object being cut.
It is preferred that the clearance angle α is ≤5°, preferably ≤10, more preferably ≤0° and even more preferably from −1° to −5° and/or the effective cutting angle first wedge angle ε is ≥15°, preferably ≥20°.
According to a preferred embodiment, the first wedge angle θ1 ranges from 5° to 75°, preferably 10° to 60°, more preferably 15° to 45° and/or the second wedge angle θ2 ranges from −5° to 40°, preferably 0° to 30°, more preferably 10° to 25°.
The cutting blades according to the present invention are preferably further strengthened by adding a thick and strong tertiary bevel that has a tertiary wedge angle greater than the secondary wedge angle and by employing this tertiary bevel to split the object to be cut, thus reducing the forces acting on the thin secondary bevel. The third wedge angle θ3 ranges preferably from 1° to 60°, more preferably from 10° to 55°, even more preferably from 19° to 46°, and in particular from 20° to 45°
The third wedge angle θ3 represents the splitting angle, i.e., the angle necessary to split the object to be cut. For this function the third wedge angle θ3 has to be preferably larger than the second wedge angle θ2.
According to a further preferred embodiment, the primary bevel has a length d1 being the dimension projected onto the first surface of the length taken from the cutting edge to the first intersecting line from 0.1 to 7 μm, preferably from 0.5 to 5 μm, and more preferably 1 to 3 μm. A length d1<0.1 μm is difficult to realize since an edge of such length is too fragile and would not allow a stable use of the cutting blade. It has been surprisingly found that the primary bevel stabilizes the blade body with the secondary and tertiary bevel which allows a slim blade in the area of the secondary bevel which offers a low cutting force. On the other hand, the primary bevel does not affect the cutting performance provided the length d1 is not larger than 7 μm.
Preferably, the length d2 being the dimension projected onto the first surface (i.e., the projection of the primary and secondary bevel) taken from the cutting edge to the second intersecting line ranges from 1 to 100 μm, more preferably from 5 to 75 μm, and even more preferably from 10 to 50 μm. The length d2 corresponds to the penetration depth of the cutting blade in the object to be cut. In general, d2 corresponds to at least 30% of the diameter of the object to be cut, i.e., when the object is human hair which typically has a diameter of around 100 μm the length d2 is around 30 μm.
The cutting blade is preferably defined by a blade body comprising or consisting of a first material and a second material joined with the first material. The second material can be deposited as a coating at least in regions of the first material, i.e., the second material can be an enveloping coating of the first material or a coating deposited on the first material on the first face.
The material of the first material is in general not limited to any specific material as long it is possible to produce a bevel using this material.
However, according to an alternative embodiment the blade body consists only of the first material, i.e., an uncoated first material. In this case, the first material is preferably a material with an isotropic structure, i.e., having identical values of a property in all directions. Such isotropic materials are often better suited for shaping, independent from the shaping technology.
The first material comprises or consists of a material selected from the group consisting of:
The steels used for the first material are preferably selected from the group consisting of 1095, 12C27, 14C28N, 154CM, 3Cr13MoV, 4034, 40X10C2M, 4116, 420, 440A, 440B, 440C, 5160, 5Cr15MoV, 8Cr13MoV, 95X18, 9Cr18MoV, Acuto+, ATS-34, AUS-4, AUS-6 (=6A), AUS-8 (=8A), C75, CPM-10V, CPM-3V, CPM-D2, CPM-M4, CPM-S-30V, CPM-S-35VN, CPM-S-60V, CPM-154, Cronidur-30, CTS 204P, CTS 20CP, CTS 40CP, CTS B52, CTS B75P, CTS BD-1, CTS BD-30P, CTS XHP, D2, Elmax, GIN-1, H1, N690, N695, Niolox (1.4153), Nitro-B, S70, SGPS, SK-5, Sleipner, T6MoV, VG-10, VG-2, X-15T.N., X50CrMoV15, ZDP189.
It is preferred that the second material comprises or consists of a material selected from the group consisting of:
Moreover, all materials cited in the VDI guideline 2840 can be chosen for the second material.
It is particularly preferred to use a second material of nano-crystalline diamond and/or multilayers of nano-crystalline and polycrystalline diamond as second material. In this regard, it was surprisingly found that cutting blades having a second material of nano-crystalline diamond layers, detachment, as is known of polycrystalline diamond, is suppressed. Relative to monocrystalline diamond, it has been shown that production of nano-crystalline diamond, compared to the production of monocrystalline diamond, can be accomplished substantially more easily and economically. Hence, also longer and larger-area cutting blades can be provided. Moreover, with respect to their grain size distribution nano-crystalline diamond layers are more homogeneous than polycrystalline diamond layers, the material also shows less inherent stress. Consequently, macroscopic distortion of the cutting edge is less probable.
It is preferred that the second material has a thickness of 0.15 to 20 μm, preferably 2 to 15 μm and more preferably 3 to 12 μm.
It is preferred that the second material has a modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus) of less than 1,200 GPa, preferably less than 900, and more preferably less than 750 GPa. Due to the low modulus of elasticity the hard coating becomes more flexible and more elastic and may be better adapted to the substrate, object or the contour to be cut. The Young's modulus is determined according to the method as disclosed in Markus Mohr et al., “Youngs modulus, fracture strength, and Poisson's ratio of nanocrystalline diamond films”, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 124308 (2θ14), in particular under paragraph III. B. Static measurement of Young's modulus.
The second material has preferably a transverse rupture stress Go of at least 1 GPa, more preferably of at least 2.5 GPa, and even more preferably at least 5 GPa.
With respect to the definition of transverse rupture stress Go, reference is made to the following literature references:
The transverse rupture stress Go is thereby determined by statistical evaluation of breakage tests, e.g., in the B3B load test according to the above literature details. It is thereby defined as the breaking stress at which there is a probability of breakage of 63%.
Due to the extremely high transverse rupture stress of the second material the detachment of individual crystallites from the second material, in particular from the cutting edge, is almost completely suppressed. Even with long-term use, the cutting blade therefore retains its original sharpness.
The second material has preferably a hardness of at least 20 GPa. The hardness is determined by nanoindentation (Yeon-Gil Jung et. al., J. Mater. Res., Vol. 19, No. 10, p. 3076).
The second material has preferably an surface roughness RRMS of less than 100 nm, more preferably less than 50 nm, and even more preferably less than 20 nm, which is calculated according to
A=evaluation area
Z(x,y)=the local roughness distribution
The surface roughness RRMS is determined according to DIN EN ISO 25178. The mentioned surface roughness makes additional mechanical polishing of the grown second material superfluous.
In a preferred embodiment, the second material has an average grain size d50 of the nano-crystalline diamond of 1 to 100 nm, preferably 5 to 90 nm and more preferably from 7 to 30 nm, and even more preferably 10 to 20 nm. The average grain size d50 may be determined using X-ray diffraction or transmission electron microscopy and counting of the grains.
It is preferred that the first material and/or the second material is/are coated at least in regions with a low-friction material, preferably selected from the group consisting of fluoropolymer materials (like PTFE), parylene, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyethylene, polypropylene, polymethyl methacrylate, graphite, diamond-like carbon (DLC) and combinations thereof.
The edge connecting the primary bevel and the secondary bevel is preferably shaped within the second material.
It is further preferred that the edge between secondary and tertiary bevel is arranged at the boundary surface of the first material and the second material which makes the process of manufacture easier to handle and therefore more economic, e.g., the blades can be manufactured according to the process of
The cutting edge ideally has a round configuration which improves the stability of the blade. The cutting edge has preferably a tip radius of less than 200 nm, more preferably less than 100 nm and even more preferably less than 50 nm determined e.g., by cross sectional SEM using the method illustrated in
It is preferred that the tip radius r of the cutting edge correlates with the average grain size d50 of the hard coating. It is hereby advantageous if the ratio between the rounded radius r of the nano-crystalline diamond as second material at the cutting edge and the average grain size d50 of the nano-crystalline diamond as second material r/d50 is from 0.03 to 20, preferably from 0.05 to 15, and particularly preferred from 0.5 to 10.
Turning now to
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In a next step 9, the diamond film is etched anisotropically by an Ar/O2-plasma in an RIE system to form an almost vertical bevel 5′ with a 900 corner in the diamond layer 104, which is required to form primary bevel 7 on the first face 2 of the cutting blade as shown in step 10.
To form primary bevel 7 on the first face 2 of the cutting blade, the Si-wafer 101 is now turned to expose the first face 2 to the subsequent etching step 10 (
Finally, in step 11 (
Lastly, in
The illustrations presented herein are not intended to be actual views of any particular substrate, apparatus (e.g., device, system, etc.), or method, but are merely idealized and/or schematic representations that are employed to describe and illustrate various embodiments of the disclosure.
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm” or ±10% of the disclosed dimension.
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application and any patent application or patent to which this application claims priority or benefit thereof, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20169937.8 | Apr 2020 | EP | regional |