Several techniques are currently employed to clad materials. These include techniques such as extrusion, rolling, electroplating, weld forming, explosive bonding and the like. Among these techniques extrusion and rolling are sensitive to variable flow stresses of the two materials and require strenuous optimization of processing parameters. Typical defects or challenges to be addressed in using these techniques include non-uniform thicknesses, porous interfaces, lack of metallurgical bonding, etc. and it especially becomes challenging when working with anisotropic hexagonal close packed (HCP) material such as magnesium, titanium or zirconium. The other aforementioned techniques are slow batch processes and unable to control the graded interface or create the desired texture in the final component.
Magnesium is a desirable material for lightweight structures is limited by its corrosion resistance, but cladding it with aluminum or similar material will significantly improve the corrosion resistance and its ability to join with other material systems. Several technical challenges arise when forming such structure such as controlling the texture of the magnesium such that the asymmetry in mechanical properties under compression and tension is eliminated, the preferred grain size of the magnesium is less than 5 micron with an aluminum cladding bonded to the magnesium and the same time forms a graded interface to minimize the corrosion rate in the system. The present disclosure provides a methodology that allows for making structures with specified cladding as well as making structures that have desired shapes and microstructural and mechanical characteristics that existing methodologies struggle to provide.
To meet these needs a process has been developed wherein functionally graded claddings and coatings are produced in a single step with tailored physical properties (such as microstructure, mechanical, electrical, thermal, etc.) and at the same time provide high corrosion resistance. Typically clad materials are preferred material systems for engineering applications, as one metal/alloy often does not satisfy the required application conditions. The major advantage of cladding is the ability to tailor properties such that the surface has a different chemical composition and properties relative to the core. For example aluminum clad copper wires provide excellent conductivity with improved corrosion life. Clad materials also offer minimal use of expensive materials, such as high temperature materials, and at the same time retain the desired physical properties such as thermal conductivity.
Over the past several years researchers at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have developed a novel Shear Assisted Processing and Extrusion (ShAPE™) technique which uses a rotating ram as opposed to the axially fed ram used in the conventional extrusion process. As described in the previously cited and incorporated references, in some embodiments the ram face contains spiral scroll features which when brought into contact with a solid billet and a forging load is applied, significant heating occurs due to friction, thus softening the underlying billet material. The combined action of the forging load together with the rotating action of the ram face, force the underlying material to flow plastically. The scroll features on the ram face help in the material flow and help in controlling the texture.
We have successfully demonstrated the scalability of this process, and we were able to alter and control the texture, grain size and also uniformly disperse the secondary particles by changing a few process parameters and at loads/pressure several orders or magnitude lower than conventional extrusion. We have now expanded applications of this tool and process to generate cladded materials by extrusion and to control various features of structures formed by this technique.
This provides significant promise over several of the prior art techniques which are typically employed to clad materials such as extrusion, rolling, electroplating, weld forming, explosive bonding, etc. Extrusion and rolling are sensitive to variable flow stresses of the two materials and require strenuous optimization of processing parameters. Typical defects or challenges to address using these techniques are non-uniform thickness, porous interface, lack of metallurgical bond, etc. and it especially becomes challenging when working with anisotropic HCP material such as magnesium, titanium or zirconium. Typically the aforementioned techniques are performed in a slow batch processes and are unable to control the graded interface or create the desired texture in the final component. Conventional linear extrusions typically have virtually constant crystallographic texture across the wall thickness.
Developing a method for forming extrusions while simultaneously varying the texture across the wall thickness could lead to improved bulk material properties. Such improvement could include but are not limited to increased strength, reduced susceptibility to corrosion and brittleness, Mechanical property improvements through breakdown and dispersion deleterious second phase particles, corrosion resistance though elimination of galvanically unfavorable second phases and precipitates, and extrusion of brittle intermetallic materials not possible by conventional means among them.
The purpose of the foregoing abstract is to enable the United States Patent and Trademark Office and the public generally, especially the scientists, engineers, and practitioners in the art who are not familiar with patent or legal terms or phraseology, to determine quickly from a cursory inspection the nature and essence of the technical disclosure of the application. The abstract is neither intended to define the invention of the application, which is measured by the claims, nor is it intended to be limiting as to the scope of the invention in any way.
Various advantages and novel features of the present invention are described herein and will become further readily apparent to those skilled in this art from the following detailed description. In the preceding and following descriptions I have shown and described only the preferred embodiment of the invention, by way of illustration of the best mode contemplated for carrying out the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modification in various respects without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description of the preferred embodiment set forth hereafter are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
The advantages of the present disclosure lie in the application of a shear assisted extrusion process for producing cladded materials wherein a cladding material and a material to be cladded are placed in sequence with the cladded material positioned to contact a rotating scroll face first and the material to be cladded second. The two materials are fed through a shear assisted extrusion device at a preselected feed rate and impacted by a rotating scroll face to generate a cladded extrusion product.
In one example the cladding material is aluminum, and the material to be clad is magnesium or a magnesium alloy. In some instances the preselected feed rate is 0.05-1.0 inches per minute, in others the rotating scroll face rotates at a rate of 10-1000 rotations per minute. The rotating scroll face can have at least 2 starts. In some embodiments the axial extrusion force is less than 50 MPa and the temperature of the billet (aluminum, magnesium or both) is less than 100° C. In various applications feed rates are varied to include a rate of less than 0.2 inches (0.51 cm) per minute and the rotational shearing force is generated from spinning the die or the billet at a rate between 100 rpm to 500 rpm.
In another embodiment, a process for creating an aluminum cladded magnesium product comprising the steps of placing a thin sheet of aluminum having a hole defined therein on center of a magnesium billet in a shear assisted extrusion device, impacting the billet with a rotating scroll face rotating at rate of (10-1000 RPM) and a feed rate of 0.05-1.0 inches per minute to extrude an aluminum cladded magnesium material. This extrusion process can include the steps of: simultaneously applying a rotational shearing force and an axial extrusion force to a billet while contacting one end of the billet with a scroll face configured to engage and move plasticized billet material toward an orifice whereby the plastically deformed billet material flows substantially perpendicularly from an outer edge of the billet through the orifice forming an extrusion product with microstructure grains about one-half the size of the grains in the billet prior to extrusion. In some variations the extrusion of the plasticized billet material is performed at a temperature less than 100° C. In other applications the axial extrusion force is at or below 100 MPa.
The resulting materials developed by such a process provide materials with mechanical property improvements through breakdown and dispersion deleterious second phase particles enabled by such a process. This includes corrosion resistance though elimination of galvanically unfavorable second phases and precipitates. The extrusion of brittle intermetallic materials not possible by conventional means and other advantages not available in the prior art.
The following description including the attached pages provide various examples of the present invention. It will be clear from this description of the invention that the invention is not limited to these illustrated embodiments but that the invention also includes a variety of modifications and embodiments thereto. Therefore the present description should be seen as illustrative and not limiting. While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, it should be understood, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the specific form disclosed, but, on the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the claims.
Various methods and techniques are described wherein application and manipulation and modification of the ShAPE™ technique and device as shown for example in demonstrated the ability to control microstructure such as crystallographic texture through the cross sectional thickness, while also providing the ability to perform various other tasks such as cladding aluminum to magnesium.
In one embodiment, such as the arrangement shown in
It has been shown that the geometry of the scroll face, using 2, 4 and 16-start tools shown in
In this arrangement where the aluminum billet and the magnesium billets are together within the structure the impact of the aluminum billet with the scroll face at relatively slow rate (150 RPM) and slow feed rate 0.3-0.15 inches per minute at room temperature, created an aluminum cladded magnesium extrusion product in tubular, wire, or rod form. In addition to this arrangement other arrangements have been shown to produce cladded materials such as rods and wire. In one particular instance this process was used to form actual extrusion components including ZK60 tubing having an outer diameter of 2.0″ and wall thickness of 60 and 120 mils.
In other applications, methodologies using the ShAPE™ design have also been developed to allow for through-wall texture control, extrusion of additional materials that were previously considered not possible for extrusion by conventional extrusion processes (such as AZS 312/317 magnesium alloys), increasing the strength, ductility, corrosion resistance and energy absorption in various materials, significant grain refinement and basal texture alignment, creation of extruded materials with reduced potential for microgalvanic corrosion, breakdown of Mg2Si intermetallics to nanoscale, elimination of Al—Zn precipitates by dissolution into solid solution, elimination of Mg17Al12 (β phase), uniform dispersion of second phases, improved ductility, and increased compressive yield stress. The application of this process is not limited to these alloys but unconventional systems like high entropy alloys have also been processed to create a single phase alloy and eliminated the dire homogenization step.
As will be described below in more detail, in addition to modifying various parameters such as feed rate, heat, pressure and spin rates of the process, various mechanical elements of the tool assist to achieve various desired results. For example, scroll patterns on the face of extrusion dies (in the ShAPE™ process) can be used to affect/control crystallographic texture through the wall thickness of extruded tubing. This can be used to advantageously alter bulk materials properties such as ductility and strength. These properties can in turn be tailored for specific engineering applications such crush, pressure or bending.
The die design and process parameters can offer unprecedented control over the microstructure of materials. An illustrative example is the use of different scroll geometry as shown in
In a first set of examples, the process parameters were as follows: material: Magnesium alloy ZK60, rotational speed 250 revolutions per minute (range can be 10-1000 rpm), extrusion rate: 0.15 inches per minute (range can be 0.05 to 1.0 ipm), die face temperature: 450 degrees Celsius (range can be 200 to 500 degrees Celsius). Under these conditions tubes with 60 mil wall thickness were extruded using 2, 4 and 16 start scrolls. One tube with 120 mil wall thickness was extruded using a 4 start scroll. This makes for a total of four tubes for which data has been collected supporting this invention.
All four tubes were cross sectioned through at least two locations along the length of the tube to ensure that potential variations in texture along the tube length were also captured.
In addition to being able to providing a process for cladding, and obtaining a desired through wall thickness. The ShAPE™ technology platform can be used to obtain structures from various materials that have not been demonstrated in other prior art configurations.
For example, Mg alloys containing Si are attractive for automotive, aerospace and high temperature applications. The maximum solubility of Si in Mg is less than 0.003 at % and the Si atoms react to form Mg2Si precipitates, which results in forming an alloy that has high melting point, low density, low coefficient of thermal expansion and increases the elastic modulus. It is also known that the Mg2Si precipitates have the same galvanic potential as that of the mg alloy matrix which results in minimization or elimination of microgalvanic corrosion making for a more corrosion resistant alloy. However, casting these alloys results in very low ductility and strength due to the formation of large Mg2Si precipitates and Chinese script brittle eutectic phase and thus cannot be easily extruded. In order to overcome this challenge several others have tried hot extrusion, rapid solidification and extrusion and mechanical alloying. All these techniques help refine the microstructure and the precipitate morphology but involve additional steps which increases the cost of the processing and does not entirely solve the issues associated with extruding such a brittle material. Even with these approaches, the extruded products also have brittle properties.
Wire and rod of brittle magnesium alloys AZS312 and AZS317 has been extruded with 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm diameters using the ShAPE™ process. Process parameters range from 0.05 to 1.0 for feed rate, 10 to 1000 for rpm rotational speed with extrusion ratios demonstrated up to 160:1 and anticipated as going as high as 200:1. Process parameters will vary depending on the material and desired extrudate dimension and the parameter values mentioned are indicative of the material/geometry investigated and are not restrictive to the process of extruding brittle materials in general. Table 1 shows mechanical test data for AZS312 and AZS317 extruded by ShAPE™ into 5.0 mm rod. The table also shows data for conventionally extruded AZ31 as a benchmark for comparison.
The AZS alloys compare similarly with AZ31 in terms of ultimate strength but show a marked improvement compressive yield strength form 97 MPa for AZ31 to 160 MPa and 155 MPa for AZS312 and AZS317 respectively. The higher compressive strength for the AZS alloys also leads to a dramatic improvement in the ratio of compressive yield strength to tensile yield strength (CYS/TYS) with 0.48 for AZ31 and 0.94 and 1.06 for AZS3112 and AZS317 respectively. This is important because the optimum value for CYS/TYS is 1.0 for energy absorption applications. In addition, the elongation at failure improves from 12% for AZ31 to 17% for AZS312. In the case of AZS alloys, ShAPE™ not only enables the extrusion of brittle materials directly from castings, but the unique shearing conditions intrinsic to ShAPE™ also enable novel microstructures which lead to the improved properties shown in Table 1.
For example
First, the brittle Mg17Al12 intermetallic present in AZ31 is not present in the AZS castings because Mg combines favorably with Si instead of Al during the casting process. As such, second phase with the lowest corrosion potential is eliminated which reduces corrosion rate. Second, Al from the Al—Zn impurity dissolves into the Mg matrix during ShAPE™ processing which further reduces the overall corrosion potential. Third, the fracturing of mm scale Mg2Si particles to the nm scale is known to reduce microgalvanic corrosion.
While various preferred embodiments of the invention are shown and described, it is to be distinctly understood that this invention is not limited thereto but may be variously embodied to practice within the scope of the following claims. From the foregoing description, it will be apparent that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/898,515 filed Feb. 17, 2018, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/460,227 filed Feb. 17, 2017, and which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/351,201 filed Nov. 14, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,189,063 issued Jan. 29, 2019, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/313,500 filed Mar. 25, 2016, and which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/222,468 filed Mar. 21, 2014, now abandoned, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/804,560 filed Mar. 22, 2013, the entirety of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract DE-AC0576RL01830 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3432369 | Naastepad | Mar 1969 | A |
3640657 | Rowe et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3661726 | Denes | May 1972 | A |
3684593 | Benz et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3884062 | Green | May 1975 | A |
3892603 | Reid | Jul 1975 | A |
3933536 | Doser et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3977918 | Paladino et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3989548 | Morris | Nov 1976 | A |
4287749 | Bachrach et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4300378 | Thiruvarudchelvan | Nov 1981 | A |
4585473 | Narasimhan et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4778542 | Clemens | Oct 1988 | A |
4801340 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4808224 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4892596 | Chatterjee | Jan 1990 | A |
4985085 | Chatterjee | Jan 1991 | A |
5026438 | Young et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5089060 | Bradley et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5242508 | McCallum et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5262123 | Thomas et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5283130 | Bradley et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5437545 | Hirai | Aug 1995 | A |
5461898 | Lessen | Oct 1995 | A |
5470401 | McCallum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5492264 | Wadleigh | Feb 1996 | A |
5737959 | Korbel et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739498 | Sunamoto et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6022424 | Sellers et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036467 | Jameson | Mar 2000 | A |
6638462 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6843405 | Okamoto et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6940379 | Creighton | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7096705 | Segal | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7314670 | Bartsch et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322508 | Chang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7954692 | Fukuda | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8016179 | Burford | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8240540 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8313692 | Somekawa et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8695868 | Messer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
10189063 | Lavender et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10369748 | Whalen et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10695811 | Joshi et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20020029601 | Kwok | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040057782 | Okamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040238501 | Kawazoe et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265503 | Clayton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060005898 | Lui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080029581 | Kumagai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048005 | Forrest et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080202653 | Ignberg | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080251571 | Burford | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090072007 | Nagano | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090291322 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100059151 | Iwamura et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100089976 | Szymanski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100132430 | Tsai et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110104515 | Kou et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110132970 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110309131 | Hovanski et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120006086 | Manchiraju et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120052322 | Hatakeyama et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120168045 | Ihara et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120258332 | Hatakeyama et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130075452 | Burford | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140002220 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140076957 | Sayama et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140102161 | Stewart | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140248508 | Ohhama et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140283574 | Lavender et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140328710 | Cui et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150075242 | Eller et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150115019 | Pascal et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150360317 | Kalvala et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160008918 | Burford | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160167353 | Fan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160175981 | Kandasamy | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160175982 | Kandasamy et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160184922 | Kikyo | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160228932 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160354860 | Boettcher et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170008121 | Li | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170136686 | Ueno et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170163135 | Emberton et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170182587 | Tokoro et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170216961 | Utter et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170225265 | Ito et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170304933 | Miles et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180036840 | Hu et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180043467 | Huysmans | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180050419 | Das et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180311713 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180354231 | Iwase | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180369889 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190275608 | Das et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20210086291 | Okada et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210205918 | Fujii et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2990178 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2003-275876 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2007-222925 | Sep 2007 | JP |
WO PCTUS2019040730 | Oct 2019 | WO |
WO PCTUS2019040730 | Jan 2021 | WO |
WO PCTUS2020053168 | Feb 2021 | WO |
WO PCTUS2021050022 | Feb 2022 | WO |
WO PCTUS2020053168 | Apr 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Liu et al., “A Review of Dissimilar Welding Techniques for Magnesium Alloys to Aluminum Alloys”, Materials, 7, 2014, United States, pp. 3735-3757. |
Liu et al., “Microstructure and mechanical properties of equimolar FeCoCrNi high entropy alloy prepared via powder extrusion”, Intermetallics 75 (2016), United States, pp. 25-30. |
Martinsen et al., “Joining of Dissimilar Materials”, CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 2015, United States, 21 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/222,468, filed Mar. 21, 2014, First named inventor Curtis A. Lavender, Notification dated Nov. 6, 2015, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/222,468, filed Mar. 21, 2014, First named inventor Curtis A. Lavender, Notification dated Apr. 6, 2016, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/222,468, filed Mar. 21, 2014, First named inventor Curtis A. Lavender, Notification dated May 20, 2016, 3 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/222,468, filed Mar. 21, 2014, First named inventor Curtis A. Lavender, Notification dated Jan. 26, 2017, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,220, filed May 2, 2014, First Named Inventor Jun Cui, Notification dated Dec. 1, 2015, 7 pages. |
Rodewald et al. “Top Nd—Fe—B Magnets with Greater Than 56 MGOe Energy Density and 9.8 kOe Coercivity”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, No. 5, 2002, United States, pp. 2955-2957. |
Saha, “Aluminum Extrusion Technology, Chapter 1, Fundamentals of Extrusion”, The Materials Information Society, ASM International, 2000, United States, pp. 1-29. |
Luo, Alan, “Magnesium: Current and Potential Automotive Applications”, JOM, 54(2), 2002, United States, pp. 42-48. |
Nakamura et al., “Tool Temperature and Process Modeling of Friction Stir Welding”, (2018) Modern Mechanical Engineering, 8, 78-94. |
Zhang et al., “Numerical Studies on Effect of Axial Pressure in Friction Stir Welding”, (2007) Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, vol. 12, No. 3, United Kingdom, pp. 226-248. |
Pickens, “Aluminum Powder Metallurgy Technology for High-Strength Applications”, Journal of Materials Science 16 (1981) 1437-1457, United Kingdom, 21 pages. |
Whalen et al., “High Ductility Aluminum Alloy Made from Powder by Friction Extrusion”, Materalia 6 (2019) 100260, Netherlands, 6 pages. |
Whalen et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/694,565, filed Sep. 1, 2017, titled “System and Process for Joining Dissimilar Materials and Solid-State Interocking Joint with Intermetallic Interface Formed Thereby”, 69 pages. |
Abu-Farha, “A Preliminary Study on the Feasibility of Friction Stir Back Extrusion”, Scripta Materials, 66, 2012, United States, 615-618. |
Amancio-Filho et al., “Joining of Polymers and Polymer-Metal Hybrid Structures: Recent Developments and Trends”, Polymer Engineering & Science, 2009, United States, pp. 1461-1476. |
Bozzi et al., “Intermetallic Compounds in AI 6016/IF-Steel Friction Stir Spot Welds”, Materials Science and Engineering, 2010, Netherlands, pp. 4505-4509. |
Cole et al., “Lightweight materials for Automotive Applications”, Materials Characterization, 35, 1995, United States, pp. 3-9. |
Evans, W.T., et al., Friction Stir Extrusion: A new process for joining dissimilar materials, Manufacturing Letters, 5, 2015, United States, pp. 25-28. |
Gann, J.A., “Magnesium Industry's Lightest Structural Metal”, SAE Transactions, vol. 25-26, 1930-1931, United States, pp. 620-634, 641. |
Hammond et al., “Equal-Channel Angular Extrusion of a Low-Density High-Entropy Alloy Produced by High-Energy Cryogenic Mechanical Alloying”, JOM. vol. 66, No. 10, United States, 2014, pp. 2021-2029. |
Kaiser et al., “Anisotropic Properties of Magnesium Sheet AZ31”, Materials Science Forum, vols. 419-422, Switzerland, 2003, pp. 315-320. |
Kuo et al., “Fabrication of High Performance Magnesium/Carbon-Fiber/PEEK/Laminated Composites”, Materials Transactions, vol. 44, No. 8 (2003), Japan, pp. 1613-1619. |
Leitao, C., et al., Aluminum-steel lap joining by multipass friction stir welding, Materials and Design, 106, 2016, United States, pp. 153-160. |
ThomasNet.com, https:/www.thomasnet.com/articles/custom-manufacturing-fabricating/friction-stir-welding/ Feb. 10, 2011 (Year: 2011). |
Trang et al., “Designing a Magnesium Alloy with High Strength and High Formability”, Nature Communications, 2018, United Kingdom, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210023596 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62460227 | Feb 2017 | US | |
62313500 | Mar 2016 | US | |
61804560 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15898515 | Feb 2018 | US |
Child | 16916548 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15351201 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 15898515 | US | |
Parent | 14222468 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15351201 | US |