Embodiments of the present disclosure relate generally to blowout preventers, and more specifically, to improved blade profiles for shear blocks in a blowout preventer ram unit.
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present disclosure, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light and not as admissions of prior art.
Blowout preventers are used extensively throughout the oil and gas industry. Typical blowout preventers include a main body to which are attached various types of ram units. The two categories of blowout preventers that are most prevalent are ram blowout preventers and annular blowout preventers. Blowout preventer stacks frequently utilize both types, typically with at least one annular blowout preventer stacked above several ram blowout preventers. The ram units in ram blowout preventers allow for both the shearing of the wellbore tubular and the sealing of the blowout preventer. Typically, a blowout preventer stack may be secured to a wellhead and may provide a means for sealing the well in the event of a system failure.
Existing ram units often include shear blocks designed to be forced together to shear the wellbore tubular and seal the blowout preventer. The shear blocks generally feature opposing blade profiles used to cut the wellbore tubular. In some ram units, the opposing blade profiles feature a straight across cutting edge and/or a V-shaped cutting edge for shearing the wellbore tubular. In other existing ram units, the opposing blade profiles feature cutting points formed at acute angles extending toward the wellbore tubular to puncture and crush the wellbore tubular. Unfortunately, such blade profiles can lead to inefficient shearing of the wellbore tubular if the wellbore tubular (e.g., particularly a wellbore tubular with small outer diameter) slips between the opposing cutting points.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and its features and advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
One or more specific embodiments of the present disclosure will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
Generally, embodiments of the disclosure are directed to a blowout preventer having a ram unit designed to shear and seal wellbore tubulars with a wide range of outer diameters. The ram unit may include a first shear block having a first blade profile, and a second shear block having a second blade profile. The first and second blade profiles may each feature an angled portion for contacting the wellbore tubular. The angled portion of the first blade profile may be a different size (e.g., width dimension) than the angled portion of the second blade profile. This may enable the larger angled portion to support a smaller wellbore tubular while contact points on the smaller angled portion apply a force for shearing the wellbore tubular. When the wellbore tubular is larger, an initial edge portion of the blade profile with the smaller angled portion may be used to support the wellbore tubular while contact points on the larger angled portion apply a force for shearing the wellbore tubular.
The contact points formed where the angled portions meet the initial edge portions of the respective shear blocks may provide more than one crush point on a given side of the wellbore tubular. An opposite side of the tubular may be supported against the opposing shear block, thus preventing the wellbore tubular from slipping within the ram unit. Such slipping can occur in existing shear block designs where the blade profiles feature sharp angles extending toward the wellbore tubular. These sharp angles can provide a failure point for shearing the wellbore tubular, but sometimes the wellbore tubular can slide to one side or the other of the sharp angled profile, leading to inefficient operation of the blowout preventer. Presently disclosed embodiments feature no such sharp angles extending toward the wellbore tubular, but rely instead on soft radiuses of the angled portions and initial edge portions of the shear blocks to support the wellbore tubular and provide multiple contact points for collapsing the wellbore tubular inward on itself to efficiently shear the wellbore tubular.
Turning now to the drawings,
In presently disclosed embodiments, each of the shear blocks 12 and 14 may include a specific blade profile designed to shear the wellbore tubular 16 in an efficient manner. The shear block 12 may feature the blade profile 18, while the opposing shear block 14 may feature the blade profile 20. As illustrated, the blade profiles 18 and 20 for the shear blocks 12 and 14, respectively, may be different from one another. Specific embodiments of the opposing blade profiles 18 and 20 are discussed in detail below.
In some embodiments, the shear blocks 12 and 14 may be vertically offset from one another, as shown in
As shown in
The illustrated shear block 14, for example, may include a blade profile 20 having an angled section 50 with a width dimension W1, and the shear block 12 may include a blade profile 18 having an angled section 52 with a width dimension W2. As illustrated, the first width dimension W1 of the blade profile 20 is larger than the second width dimension W2 of the blade profile 18. These different sized angled sections 50 and 52 may allow the ram unit 10 to easily and efficiently cut through a range of different sized wellbore tubulars. The different sized angled section 50 and 52 may be used in combination to shear the wellbore tubular using less pressure than would be necessary to shear the tubular with shear blocks having identical blade profiles.
As illustrated, the blade profile 18 may include an initial edge section 54 extending from both sides of the angled section 52 of the blade profile 18. The angled section 52 may be generally angled such that it extends from the initial edge section 54 into the shear block 12 in a direction away from the oppositely facing shear block 14. Similarly, the blade profile 20 of the shear block 14 may include an initial edge section 56 extending from both sides of the angled section 50 of the blade profile 20. The angled section 50 may be generally angled such that it extends from the initial edge section 56 into the shear block 14 in a direction away from the oppositely facing shear block 12.
In the illustrated embodiment, the angled sections 50 and 52 of each blade profile are generally rounded V-shaped sections (i.e., V-shaped sections each having a soft radius). The soft radius of each profile may allow wellbore tubulars of different sizes to work their way into the opposing angled sections 50 and 52 prior to the blade profiles 18 and 20 shearing the wellbore tubular. In other embodiments, the angled sections 50 and 52 may each feature a rounded profile with a diameter of approximately the corresponding width dimension (i.e., W1 and W2). In still other embodiments, the angled sections 50 and 52 may be V-shaped sections with straight edges.
It should be noted that the blade profiles 18 and 20 do not include any acute angled portions extending outward in a direction of the opposing shear block. Such acute angled portions extending toward the wellbore tubular could potentially cause the wellbore tubular to slip to one side or the other of the acute angled portion. Such slippage is not a concern for the disclosed embodiments, since the blade profiles 18 and 20 are designed to seat the wellbore tubular within one or both of the inwardly-extending angled sections 50 and 52.
In the illustrated embodiment, the initial edge section 54 of the blade profile 18 may be angled slightly inward toward the angled section 52 of the blade profile 18 and in a direction away from the opposing shear block 14. Similarly, the initial edge section 56 of the blade profile 20 may be angled slightly inward toward the angled section 50 of the blade profile 20 and in a direction away from the opposing shear block 12. In other embodiments, the initial edge sections 54 and 56 of the respective blade profiles 18 and 20 may be inwardly rounded. In still other embodiments, the initial edge sections 54 and 56 may cut straight across the width of the respective blade profiles 18 and 20 until the points where the initial edge sections 54 and 56 meet the angled sections 52 and 50.
As mentioned above, the width dimension W1 of the angled section 50 of the blade profile 20 may be larger than the width dimension W2 of the angled section 52 of the opposing blade profile 18. In some embodiments, the width dimension W1 of the angled section 50 may be within a range of approximately 3 to 6 inches, or approximately equal to 4.5 inches. The width dimension W2 of the angled section 52 may be within a range of approximately 0.5 to 2.5 inches, or approximately equal to 1.8 inches. The illustrated width dimensions are taken as a distance between contact points where the angled sections 50 and 52 meet their respective initial edge sections 56 and 54.
Similarly, the angled section 50 may extend into the shear block 14 by a depth dimension D1 that is larger than a depth dimension D2 of the angled section 52 extending into the opposing shear block 12. In some embodiments, the depth dimension D1 of the angled section 50 may be within a range of approximately 1 to 3 inches, or approximately equal to 2.2 inches. The depth dimension D2 of the angled section 52 may be within a range of approximately 0.5 to 2.5 inches, or approximately equal to 1.8 inches. The illustrated depth dimensions D1 and D2 are taken as a distance from a straight line (58, 60) across the width of each shear block at its furthest point in a direction of the opposite shear block and a most inwardly extending point of the angled section. In the following discussion, these lines may be referred to by reference numerals 58 (for the blade profile 20) and 60 (for the blade profile 18).
In some embodiments, the initial edge sections 56 and 54 may be angled relative to the respective lines 58 and 60 extending straight across the respective shear blocks 14 and 12. As illustrated, the angle φ1 that the initial edge section 56 makes with the line 58 may be equal to the angle φ2 that the initial edge section 54 makes with the line 60. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, both angles φ1 and φ2 may be approximately equal to 12.5°. In other embodiments, these angles φ1 and φ2 may be different from one another.
In the disclosed embodiments, the angled sections 50 and 52 are generally angled relative to the respective lines 58 and 60. As illustrated, angle θ1 that the angled section 50 makes relative to the line 58 may be smaller than the angle θ2 that the angled section 52 makes with line 60. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, the angle θ1 may be approximately equal to 40° and the angle θ2 may be approximately equal to 45°.
The dimensions described above for the blade profiles 18 and 20 illustrated in
Having now discussed the general shape and dimensions of the blade profiles 18 and 20 used in the disclosed ram unit 10, two detailed examples of the ram unit 10 being used to shear different sized wellbore tubulars will be provided.
As illustrated and discussed above with reference to
While the disclosure may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the following appended claims.