The present invention is related to medical devices, methods and systems. More specifically, the invention is related to devices, methods and systems for accessing various blood vessels in a patient, such as one or both renal arteries and one or more peripheral vessels.
In the setting of interventional radiology, numerous conditions exist that warrant placement of various intravascular devices into the lower limb arteries (iliac, femoral, popliteal, etc.). Such devices may include catheters and guidewires for diagnostic purposes, or systems for therapeutic or prophylactic applications such as drug infusion, monitoring/sampling, angioplasty and stenting, possibly in conjunction with embolic protection. In any event, these procedures often involve the use of radiocontrast agents known to have detrimental effects on renal function.
In many instances, lower limb arteries intended for diagnosis or intervention are accessed via an “up-and-over” approach, which first involves gaining arterial access on one side of the patient, typically though not necessarily via a femoral artery. From that access point, one or more diagnostic, prophylactic, and/or treatment devices are advanced in a retrograde fashion through the iliac artery on the side of access to the aortic bifurcation and then down along the direction of blood flow on the contralateral side, through the contralateral iliac artery, into and possibly through the contralateral femoral artery, etc. to the site of treatment and/or diagnostic procedure. As mentioned above, performing the treatment and/or diagnostic procedure often involves injection of a radiocontrast agent to allow the physician(s) to visualize the treatment/diagnostic site.
The nephrotoxicity of radio contrast agents has been well established. In patients with known risk factors, radiocontrast nephropathy (RCN) is a prevalent adverse effect of interventional procedures utilizing organically bound iodine-based contrast imaging agents. While the full mechanism of RCN is not known, its detrimental results on morbidity and mortality are well documented, and it is hypothesized that local agent administration to the renal arteries during the time of contrast media exposure may mitigate the development of RCN. Agents in this case may include vasodilators, diuretics, or hyper-oxygenated blood or blood substitute. As well as agent infusion, the exchange of blood laden with contrast media and replacement of it with filtered blood, via use of an external blood filter/pump might be warranted.
Various apparatus and methods for providing local delivery of substances to renal arteries have be described by the inventors of the present invention in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/724,691 , filed Nov. 28, 2000; Ser. No. 10/422,624 , filed Apr. 23, 2003; Ser. No. 10/251,915 , filed Sep. 20, 2002; Ser. No. 10/636,359 , filed Aug. 6, 2003; and Ser. No. 10/636,801 , filed Aug. 6, 2003, the full disclosures of which are all incorporated herein by reference. Apparatus and methods for renal delivery of substances have also been described in PCT Patent Application Nos.: PCT/US03/029744 , filed Sep. 22, 2003; PCT/US03/29995 , filed Sep. 22, 2003; PCT/US03/29743 , filed Sep. 22, 2003; and PCTIUS03129585 , filed Sep. 22, 2003, the full disclosures of which are all incorporated herein by reference.
For the reasons described above, in some diagnostic and treatment procedures performed in the peripheral vasculature, especially in patients with renal risk factors, it may be desirable to concurrently provide for a means of renal protection via site-specific agent delivery to the renal arteries. Thus, a need exists for devices, methods and systems that provide access to one or more renal arteries and to one or more peripheral vessels. Ideally, such devices, methods and systems would allow for access and substance delivery through a common introducer device that provides access via a femoral artery. At least some of these objectives will be met by the present invention.
In one aspect of the present invention, a single lumen introducer sheath for accessing at least one renal artery and at least one peripheral blood vessel of a patient includes a proximal hub comprising first and second ports and a lumen extending from the ports and having proximal and distal apertures. The lumen extends from the first and second ports and has sufficient length such that when the ports are positioned outside the patient a distal end of the lumen is positionable in the abdominal aorta at or near origins of the patient's renal arteries. The proximal aperture in the lumen is configured to allow passage of a vascular catheter device through the proximal aperture and into or through an iliac artery contralateral to an insertion point of the introducer sheath into the patient. The distal aperture at the distal end of the lumen is configured to allow passage of a bifurcated renal catheter device out of the distal aperture to enter at least one of the renal arteries. Typically, though not necessarily, the proximal aperture comprises a side aperture in the lumen.
For purposes of the present application, the term “contralateral” refers to the side of the patient that is opposite the side in which an introducer sheath is placed. Various embodiments of the sheath described herein may be placed on either side of a patient, typically though not necessarily via a femoral artery access site. Thus, in one example where a sheath is inserted into a patient's right femoral artery, then the left side of the patient's body would be the contralateral side. If a sheath is inserted into a patient's left femoral artery, then the contralateral side is the right side.
In another aspect of the present invention, a dual lumen introducer sheath for accessing at least one renal artery and at least one peripheral blood vessel of a patient includes a proximal hub comprising first and second ports, a first lumen, and a second lumen. The first lumen extends from the first port to a first distal aperture and has sufficient length such that when the first port is positioned outside the patient the first distal aperture is positionable in the abdominal aorta at or near origins of the patient's renal arteries. The second lumen extends from the second port to a second distal aperture and has a shorter length than the length of the first lumen. The second lumen is configured to allow passage of a catheter device through the second lumen and into or through an iliac artery contralateral to an insertion point of the introducer sheath into the patient.
In some embodiments, the first and second lumens are disposed side-by-side in a proximal portion of the introducer sheath, and the first lumen extends beyond the proximal portion. In some embodiments, the first lumen is configured to accept a bifurcated catheter for delivering one or more substances into the renal arteries. The second lumen may be configured to accept, for example, a balloon angioplasty catheter device for performing an angioplasty procedure in one or more peripheral arteries.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method for advancing at least two catheter devices into vasculature of a patient first involves positioning a single lumen introducer sheath in the patient such that the sheath extends from a proximal, two-port hub outside the patient into one of the patient's iliac arteries, and thus to a distal end in an abdominal aorta at or near origins of renal arteries of the patient. Next, a bifurcated renal artery catheter device is advanced through the distal end of the sheath's lumen to extend into the renal arteries, and a vascular catheter device is advanced through a proximal aperture in the lumen into at least one peripheral vessel of the patient on a contralateral side of the patient relative to an insertion point of the sheath. In various embodiments, the vascular catheter may be advanced through the introducer sheath before or after the renal catheter is advanced.
In some embodiments, the method further involves delivering at least one substance into at least one of the renal arteries through the bifurcated renal artery catheter device. For example, substances which may be delivered through the renal artery catheter device include, but are not limited to, vasodilators, diuretics, hyper-oxygenated blood, hyper-oxygenated blood substitutes and filtered blood. In some embodiments, the method further involves delivering at least one additional substance into peripheral vessel(s) of the patient through the vascular catheter device. For example, such an additional substance may include, but is not limited to, a radio contrast agent. Optionally, the method may further include performing an interventional procedure in at least one peripheral vessel of the patient, using the vascular catheter device. One example of such a procedure is an angioplasty procedure.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method for advancing at least two catheter devices into vasculature of a patient involves positioning a dual lumen introducer sheath in the patient such that the sheath extends from a proximal hub outside the patient into one of the patient's iliac arteries, and thus to a first distal aperture of a first lumen in the abdominal aorta at or near origins of renal arteries of the patient and to a second distal aperture of a second lumen in or near the iliac artery in which the sheath is positioned. The method then involves advancing a bifurcated renal artery catheter device through the first lumen and first distal aperture to extend into the renal arteries. The method then involves advancing a vascular catheter device through the second lumen and second distal aperture into at least one peripheral vessel of the patient on a contralateral side of the patient relative to an insertion point of the sheath. Again, in various embodiments, the vascular catheter may be advanced through the sheath either before or after the renal catheter is advanced.
In another aspect of the invention, a system for accessing at least one renal artery and at least one peripheral blood vessel of a patient includes a single lumen introducer sheath, a bifurcated renal artery catheter device for advancing through the first lumen to access the renal arteries, and a vascular catheter device for advancing through the second lumen and into or through the contralateral iliac artery. The single lumen sheath includes a proximal hub, a lumen, a proximal aperture in the lumen, and a distal aperture at the distal end of the lumen, as described above. The sheath may include any of the features previously described.
In some embodiments, the bifurcated renal artery catheter device is configured to expand from a constrained configuration within the introducer sheath to a deployed configuration in which two oppositely directed distal ends are positioned within the two renal arteries of the patient. In some embodiments, one of the two distal ends includes an aperture for allowing passage of fluid from the bifurcated renal artery catheter into one of the renal arteries. In alternative embodiments, each of the two distal ends includes an aperture for allowing passage of fluid from the bifurcated renal artery catheter into one of the renal arteries. The vascular catheter may comprise any diagnostic and/or treatment catheter device suitable for accessing and performing a function in a blood vessel. In one embodiment, for example, the vascular catheter device comprises a balloon angioplasty catheter.
In another aspect of the present invention, a system for accessing at least one renal artery and at least one peripheral blood vessel of a patient includes a dual lumen introducer sheath, a bifurcated renal artery catheter device for advancing through the first lumen to access the renal arteries, and a vascular catheter device for advancing through the second lumen and into or through the contralateral iliac artery. The dual lumen introducer sheath includes a proximal hub, a first lumen, and a second lumen, as described above. The introducer sheath may include any of the features previously described.
These and other aspects and embodiments of the invention will be described in further detail below, with reference to the attached drawing figures.
Referring to
Introducer sheath 12 is generally adapted to be placed at the desired in-vivo location via traditional vascular access technique. After this placement, bifurcated renal artery catheter 14 is delivered into first entry port 24 on hub 18 and advanced through first lumen 20 to extend out first distal aperture 28, such that each of its two branches is positioned within a renal artery R. In various embodiments, bifurcated renal artery catheter 14 may be any of a number of suitable renal catheter devices, many examples of which are described in the patent applications incorporated by reference above in the background section. In some embodiments, bifurcated catheter 14 may be adapted to access both renal arteries, while in alternative embodiments only one renal artery may be accessed, and the opposite arm of the bifurcated catheter may act as an anchor or support. Once it is placed in a desired position, bifurcated renal artery catheter 14 may be used to selectively infuse one or more agents, typically renal protective agents, into the renal arteries. Such agents may include, but are not limited to, vasodilators, saline, diuretics, hyper-oxygenated blood, hyper-oxygenated blood substitutes and filtered blood. In other embodiments, other agent(s) may be used prevent or reduce negative effects of one or more radiocontrast agents that are subsequently or simultaneously delivered elsewhere. In some embodiments, system 10 may include a source of such agent(s).
In some embodiments, once renal catheter 14 is positioned, vascular catheter device 16 may then be advanced into second entry port 26 on hub 18, advanced through second lumen 22 and second distal aperture 30, and further advanced into and possibly through the contralateral iliac artery Cl. Depending on the desired treatment and/or diagnosis site, vascular catheter 16 may be advanced into the contralateral femoral artery or through the contralateral femoral artery into one or more peripheral vessels. Vascular catheter device 16 itself may comprise any of a number of suitable devices, such as a balloon angioplasty catheter (as shown), an atherectomy catheter, an ultrasound catheter, an infusion catheter or the like. Once placed in a desired position in the contralateral peripheral vasculature of the patient, vascular catheter 16 may then be used to perform one or more diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures. Many of such procedures involve the introduction of one or more radiocontrast dyes or agents, and any adverse effects of such agents on the kidneys K will be mitigated by the substance(s) delivered via bifurcated renal artery catheter 14.
In various embodiments, system 10 may include additional, fewer and/or alternative components or devices. Furthermore, in various embodiments of a method for using system 10, the various steps may be performed in a different order and/or steps may be added or eliminated. For example, in one embodiment, a renal protective substance may be delivered via renal catheter 14 at the same time that a radiocontrast agent is delivered via vascular catheter 16. In another embodiment, the method may involve multiple infusions of renal protective substance(s) and/or multiple infusions of radio contrast material(s) in any of a number of different orders. Thus, the described method is but one preferred way in which vascular access system 10 may be used.
With reference now to
Because sheath 12 maybe delivered to the peri-renal aorta, past the aortic bifurcation, sheath 12 may be further adapted to allow for the diagnostic or interventional device performing the lower limb procedure to exit along its length at a pre-determined or variable location so as to allow for the “up-and-over” delivery about the aortic bifurcation as previously discussed. In one particular embodiment, this may involve an aperture or other opening in the side wall of sheath 12 at an appropriate point. In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
Referring now to
A method for using system 50 is much the same as the method described above with reference to
Referring now to
Renal catheter 14 may be delivered in a collapsed condition via sheath 12 to the abdominal aorta in the vicinity of the renal arteries. Once deployed, it may expand to contact the walls of the vessel, in an attempt to regain the shape configuration as demonstrated above. This expansion and contraction may be active or passive, as desired, based on the design of renal catheter 14. For the purposes of illustration, the device is considered to be in its free state as pictured in
When deployed in the aorta, in a procedure where it is desired to access the renal arteries, renal catheter 14 will exit introducer sheath 12, and branches 15, 17 will seek to open to their natural, at-rest state. This will bias branches 15, 17 away from each other and against the inner wall of the vessel, at approximately 180 degrees apart from each other, more or less centering catheter body 32 in the aorta. The proximal end of renal catheter 14 may be manipulated via standard technique (ie., the use of a supplied “torque device” as is common with intravascular guidewires) so that branches 15, 17 are more or less aligned near the target renal arteries' ostia, and with a minimal amount of axial or rotational manipulation, bilateral renal artery cannulation can be achieved.
Previous disclosures by the inventors of the present application have also addressed the merits of various embodiments of bifurcated renal catheters 14 in providing access to multiple vessels simultaneously through a single vascular access point, alone or in combination with other diagnostic or therapeutic interventions or other procedures. For example, such disclosures include U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/476,347 , filed Jun. 5, 2003; 60/486,206 , filed Jul. 9, 2003; 60/502,600 , filed Sep. 13, 2003; 60/502,339 , filed Sep. 13, 2003; 60/505,281 , filed Sep. 22, 2003; 60/493,100 , filed Aug. 5, 2003; 601,502,468 , filed Sep. 13, 2003; 60/543,671 , filed Feb. 9, 2004; 60/550,632 , filed Mar. 4, 2004; 60/550,774 , filed Mar. 5, 2004; 60/571,057 , filed May 14, 2004; 60/612,731 , filed Sep. 24, 2004; and 60/612,801 , filed Sep. 24, 2004, the full disclosures of which are all hereby incorporated by reference. Similar and alternative embodiments are described in PCT Patent Application Nos.: PCT/US03/029744 , filed Sep. 22, 2003; PCT/US04/008573 , filed Mar. 19, 2004; PCT/US03/029586 , filed Sep. 22, 2003; and PCT/US03/029585 , filed Sep. 22, 2003, the full disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Bifurcated renal catheter 14 may be similar to that previously described in the above-referenced patent applications or may have any other suitable design and features for bilateral renal cannulation. The example provided and discussed herein for illustration includes, without limitation, a passively self-expanding branched assembly that uses outer sheath constraint to allow delivery to the area of the renal arteries and then expands upon delivery out of the sheath. However, in further embodiments the catheter may also be of the type that is independently collapsible and expandable, if so desired. Various features may be further included. In one particular beneficial embodiment, two distal arms are provided whose shapes and flexibility profile allow for fast bilateral renal artery cannulation with a minimum of required manipulation and such that there is no induced vascular trauma. Exemplary catheter shaft and distal arms may be in the range for example of about 1 Fr. To about 4 Fr. outer diameter. Exemplary arm lengths may be for example in the range of about 2 cm to about 5 cm.
Dimensions and other particular features such as shape, stiffness, etc. may be varied according to the scale of the patient's anatomy, and thus a kit of devices may be provided from which a healthcare provider may chose one particular device to meet a particular need for a particular patient. For example, multiple renal catheters may be provided having small, medium, and large sizes, respectively. Upon being provided a particular patient parameter, such as anatomical dimensions, a person could refer to the device sizes offered and simply match the chosen size to the parameter given. In this regard, a chart may be provided which assists in matching a measured or estimated patient parameter with the appropriate catheter choice.
Although the foregoing is a complete and accurate description of various embodiments of the present invention, any of a number of changes, additions or deletions may be made to one or more embodiments.
Therefore, the foregoing description is provided for exemplary purposes and should not be interpreted to limit the scope of the claims.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/073,421, entitled “Sheath for use in peripheral interventions”, filed Mar. 4, 2005 and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/550,632 , filed Mar. 4, 2004, and 60/550,774, , filed Mar. 5, 2004, the full disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1696018 | Schellberg | Dec 1928 | A |
2499045 | Walker et al. | Feb 1950 | A |
3144868 | Jascalevich | Aug 1964 | A |
3455298 | Anstadt | Jul 1969 | A |
3516408 | Montanti | Jun 1970 | A |
3667069 | Blackshear et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3730186 | Edmunds, Jr. et al. | May 1973 | A |
3791374 | Guarino | Feb 1974 | A |
3841331 | Wilder et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3995623 | Blake et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4248224 | Jones | Feb 1981 | A |
4309994 | Grunwald | Jan 1982 | A |
4345602 | Yoshimura et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4407271 | Schiff | Oct 1983 | A |
4423725 | Baran et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4459977 | Pizon et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4490374 | Bandurco et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4493697 | Krause et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4536893 | Parravicini | Aug 1985 | A |
4546759 | Solar | Oct 1985 | A |
4554284 | Stringer et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4636195 | Wolinsky | Jan 1987 | A |
4685446 | Choy | Aug 1987 | A |
4705502 | Patel | Nov 1987 | A |
4705507 | Boyles | Nov 1987 | A |
4712551 | Rayhanabad | Dec 1987 | A |
4714460 | Calderon | Dec 1987 | A |
4723939 | Anaise | Feb 1988 | A |
4753221 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4781716 | Richelsoph | Nov 1988 | A |
4817586 | Wampler | Apr 1989 | A |
4834707 | Evans | May 1989 | A |
4840172 | Augustine et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4846831 | Skillin | Jul 1989 | A |
4861330 | Voss | Aug 1989 | A |
4863461 | Jarvik | Sep 1989 | A |
4888011 | Kung et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4902272 | Milder et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4902291 | Kolff | Feb 1990 | A |
4906229 | Wampler | Mar 1990 | A |
4909252 | Goldberger | Mar 1990 | A |
4911163 | Fina | Mar 1990 | A |
4919647 | Nash | Apr 1990 | A |
4925377 | Inacio et al. | May 1990 | A |
4925443 | Heilman et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927407 | Dorman | May 1990 | A |
4927412 | Menasche | May 1990 | A |
4938766 | Jarvik | Jul 1990 | A |
4950226 | Barron | Aug 1990 | A |
4957477 | Lundback | Sep 1990 | A |
4964864 | Summers et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4976691 | Sahota | Dec 1990 | A |
4976692 | Atad | Dec 1990 | A |
4990139 | Jang | Feb 1991 | A |
4995864 | Bartholomew et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002531 | Bonzel | Mar 1991 | A |
5002532 | Gaiser et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5044369 | Sahota | Sep 1991 | A |
5053023 | Martin | Oct 1991 | A |
5059178 | Ya | Oct 1991 | A |
5067960 | Grandjean | Nov 1991 | A |
5069662 | Bodden | Dec 1991 | A |
5069680 | Grandjean | Dec 1991 | A |
5073094 | Dorman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5087244 | Wolinsky | Feb 1992 | A |
5089019 | Grandjean | Feb 1992 | A |
5098370 | Rahat et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098442 | Grandjean | Mar 1992 | A |
5112301 | Fenton, Jr. et al. | May 1992 | A |
5112349 | Summers et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119804 | Anstadt | Jun 1992 | A |
5129883 | Black | Jul 1992 | A |
5131905 | Grooters | Jul 1992 | A |
5135474 | Swan et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5158540 | Wijay et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5160323 | Andrew | Nov 1992 | A |
5163910 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167628 | Boyles | Dec 1992 | A |
5180364 | Ginsburg | Jan 1993 | A |
5205810 | Guiraudon et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5226888 | Arney | Jul 1993 | A |
5256141 | Gencheff et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257974 | Cox | Nov 1993 | A |
5282784 | Willard | Feb 1994 | A |
5290227 | Pasque | Mar 1994 | A |
5292309 | Van Tassel et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5308319 | Ide et al. | May 1994 | A |
5308320 | Safar et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312343 | Krog et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320604 | Walker et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326374 | Ilbawi et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5328470 | Nabel et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332403 | Kolff | Jul 1994 | A |
5345927 | Bonutti | Sep 1994 | A |
5358519 | Grandjean | Oct 1994 | A |
5364337 | Guiraudon et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370617 | Sahota | Dec 1994 | A |
5383840 | Heilman et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389090 | Fischell et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5397307 | Goodin | Mar 1995 | A |
5405341 | Martin | Apr 1995 | A |
5411479 | Bodden | May 1995 | A |
5421826 | Crocker et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429584 | Chiu | Jul 1995 | A |
5453084 | Moses | Sep 1995 | A |
5464449 | Ryan et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476453 | Mehta | Dec 1995 | A |
5478331 | Heflin et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484385 | Rishton | Jan 1996 | A |
5505701 | Anaya Fernandez de Lomana | Apr 1996 | A |
5509428 | Dunlop | Apr 1996 | A |
5536250 | Klein et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5558617 | Heilman et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569296 | Marin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5599306 | Klein et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609628 | Keranen | Mar 1997 | A |
5613949 | Miraki | Mar 1997 | A |
5613980 | Chauhan | Mar 1997 | A |
5617878 | Taheri | Apr 1997 | A |
5637086 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643171 | Bradshaw et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5643215 | Fuhrman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669924 | Shaknovich | Sep 1997 | A |
5702343 | Alferness | Dec 1997 | A |
5713853 | Clark et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713860 | Kaplan et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720735 | Dorros | Feb 1998 | A |
5755779 | Horiguchi | May 1998 | A |
5762599 | Sohn | Jun 1998 | A |
5766151 | Valley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776190 | Jarvik | Jul 1998 | A |
5797876 | Spears et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807311 | Palestrant | Sep 1998 | A |
5807895 | Stratton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817046 | Glickman | Oct 1998 | A |
5820585 | Mobin-Uddin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5902229 | Tsitlik et al. | May 1999 | A |
5902336 | Mishkin | May 1999 | A |
5913852 | Magram | Jun 1999 | A |
5928132 | Leschinsky | Jul 1999 | A |
5935924 | Bunting et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968013 | Smith et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971910 | Tsitlik et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984955 | Wisselink | Nov 1999 | A |
6001079 | Pourchez | Dec 1999 | A |
6013054 | Jiun Yan | Jan 2000 | A |
6039721 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6068629 | Haissaguerre et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077256 | Mann | Jun 2000 | A |
6086527 | Talpade | Jul 2000 | A |
6086557 | Morejohn et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096073 | Webster et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117117 | Mauch | Sep 2000 | A |
6117156 | Richter et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6142973 | Carleton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6143002 | Vietmeier | Nov 2000 | A |
6156016 | Maginot | Dec 2000 | A |
6165120 | Schweich et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6190349 | Ash et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210380 | Mauch | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6251133 | Richter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261273 | Ruiz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261316 | Shaolian et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287277 | Yan | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287608 | Levin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6325826 | Vardi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6383172 | Barbut | May 2002 | B1 |
6387037 | Bolling et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390969 | Bolling et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6468241 | Gelfand et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475208 | Mauch | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482211 | Choi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494875 | Mauch | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508787 | Erbel et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514226 | Levin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533747 | Polaschegg et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540779 | Richter et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6592567 | Levin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595959 | Stratienko et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6669718 | Besselink | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699231 | Sterman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6733474 | Kusleika | May 2004 | B2 |
6749598 | Keren et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749628 | Callol et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6884258 | Vardi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887258 | Denison et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6911039 | Shiu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6945992 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6994700 | Elkins et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7063679 | Maguire et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7104981 | Elkins et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7241273 | Maguire et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7329236 | Kesten et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335192 | Keren et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341570 | Keren et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7364566 | Elkins et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381204 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7470252 | Mickley et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7563247 | Maguire et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7585836 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20010023334 | St. Goar et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010029349 | Leschinsky | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010031907 | Downey et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020022857 | Goldsteen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020090388 | Humes et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091355 | Hayden | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091362 | Maginot et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020165574 | Ressemann et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169413 | Keren et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030050600 | Ressemann et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069468 | Bolling et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100919 | Hopkins et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030144636 | Liu | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153898 | Schon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181856 | Goldman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030220664 | Petrick et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040002730 | Denison et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044302 | Bernard et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064089 | Kesten et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097900 | Keren et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111148 | Goodson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117003 | Ouriel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040167415 | Gelfand et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167463 | Zawacki et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040254236 | Dong et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027305 | Shiu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050197624 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245882 | Elkins et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245892 | Elkins et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267010 | Goodson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030814 | Valencia et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036218 | Goodson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047266 | Elkins et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067972 | Kesten et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069323 | Elkins et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079836 | Holman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079859 | Elkins et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060149350 | Patel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167437 | Valencia | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060259066 | Euteneuer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070053904 | Kirst et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070167913 | Elkins et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070213686 | Mathur et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070249997 | Goodson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070287967 | Hekmat et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080103442 | Kesten et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080154236 | Elkins et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080221551 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090105799 | Hekmat et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090305990 | Goodson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306625 | Pereira et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318857 | Goodson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
43 24 637 | Mar 1995 | DE |
0 654 283 | May 1995 | EP |
0 884 064 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1635736 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1644070 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1750506 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1659970 | May 2008 | EP |
1928535 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1933920 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1804879 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2023997 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2 239 675 | Jul 1997 | GB |
2006508776 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006526464 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006527629 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007521233 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007537298 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008514298 | May 2008 | JP |
2009509644 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009511199 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009539504 | Nov 2009 | JP |
WO 9711737 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9803213 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9817347 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9852639 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9922784 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9933407 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9951286 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0041612 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0137882 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0141861 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0183016 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0197687 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0197717 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0197878 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0197879 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 200426370 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 200432791 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004030718 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005002660 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005014100 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2004107965 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005091910 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005112980 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006036944 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007041031 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007044907 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007146825 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008112563 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2009055564 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009114826 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“FDA Form 510(K) on related correspondence for Advanced Equipment Development, Inc.”. |
Agostoni et al. “Sustained Benefit from Ultrafiltration in Moderate Congestive Heart Failure”, Cardiology 2001:96 183-189. |
Akaba et al., “A Cylinder-Shaped Balloon Catheter for the Management of Dissecting Aneurysms in Acute Stage,” Herz, vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 390-393, Dec. 1992. Abstract Only. |
Aspelin, et al., “Nephrotoxic Effects in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Angiography,” N Engl J Med, Feb. 2003, vol. 348, No. 6, pp. 491-499. |
Bakris et al., “Renal Hemodynamics in Radiocontrast Medium-Induced Renal Dysfunction: A Role for Dopamine-1 Receptors,” Kidney Internatinal, vol. 56 pp. 206-210 (1999). |
Beregi, et al., “Doppler Flow Wire Evaluation of Renal Blood Flow Reserve in Hyertenstive Patient With Normal Renal Arteries,” Cardio Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 23, pp. 340-346 (2000). |
Bergey et al., “Transhepatic Insertion of Vascular Dialysis Catheters in Children: A Safe, Life-Prolonging Procedure,” Pediatr. Radiol., vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 42-50, Jan. 1999. Abstract Only. |
Bischoff et al., “Modified in Situ Perfusion of the Kidney Using Balloon Catheters,” Fortschr Med vol. 94, No. 30, pp. 1695-1697, Oct. 21, 1976. Abstract Only. |
Chatterjee, “Refractory heart failure-drugs and devices”, European Heart Journal, 2001, 22:2227-2230. |
Chu, et al. “Fenoldopam in the Prevention of Contrast Media-Induced Acute Renal Failure,” The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 35:1278-1282 (2001). |
Cohn, “The Management of Chronic Heart Failure,” The New England Journal of Medicine, pp. 490-498, Aug. 15, 1996. |
Darves, “ASHP: Perioperative Fenoldopam Improves Renal Function During Major Surgery,” Retrieved from the Internet [Online]: www.pslgroup.com/dg/225C72.htm, Dec. 19, 2002. |
Del Greco, “The Kidney in Congestive Heart Failure,” Modem Concepts of Cardiovascular Disease, Sep. 1975, vol. 44, No. 9, pp. 47-52. |
D'Elia et al., “Nephrotoxicity from Angiographic Contrast Material, A Prosepctive Study,” Am J Med, May 1982, vol. 72, pp. 719-725. |
Diaz-Sandoval, et al., “Acetylcysteine to Prevent Angiography-Related Renal Tissue Injury,” The American Journal of Cardiology, Feb. 1, 2002: vol. 89, pp. 356-358. |
Drescher et al., “Prevention of Contrast Medium-Induced Renal Vasospasm by Phosphodiesterase Inhibition,” Invest Radiol, 1998;33:858-862. |
Eisenberg et al., “Renal Failure after Major Angiography Can be Avoided with Hydration”, AJR, May 1981; 136:859-861. |
Eisenberg et al., “Renal Failure After Major Angiography,” Am J Med, Jan. 1980, vol. 68, pp. 43-46. |
Eisenberger et al., “Transfemoral Cannulation of the Renal Vessels. Diagnostic and Therapeutic use in Urology,” Urologe [A], vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-5, Jan. 1977. Abstract Only. |
Elkayam et al., “Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Vasodilation with Nifedipine and Hydralazine in Patients With Heart Failure,” JACC, vol. 4, No. 6 (Dec. 1984), pp. 1261-1267. |
Elkayam et al., “Renal Vasodilatory Effect of Endothelial Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Congestive Heart Failure,” J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28: 176-182. |
Fox, “Mechanisms of Contraction,” Human Physiology, Fourth Edition, Chapter 12, pp. 300-323. |
Freeman, et al., “Nephopathy Requiring Dialysis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the Critical role of an Adjusted Contrast Dose,” Am J Cardiol, vol. 90, (Nov. 15, 2002) pp. 1068-1073. |
Garwood et al., “Renal Preservation Strategies for High Risk Patients,” University of Chico School of Medicine, Cover Page, Table of Contents Page, pp. 1-19, (1998). |
Gerlach, et al., “Contrast Medium-Induced Nephrotoxicity: Pathophysiology and Prevention,” Pharmacotherapy, 2000, 20(5):540-548. |
Greco et al., “Atherosclerotic Ischemic Renal Disease,” Am. J. Kidney Dis., vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 167-187, Feb. 1997. Abstract Only. |
Gruberg, et al., “The Prognostic Implications of Further Renal Function Deterioration Within 48 h of Interventional Coronary in Patients With Pre-existent Chronic Renal Insufficiency,” J Am Coli Cardiol, 2000, vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 1542-1548. |
Halpenny, et al., “The effects of fenoldopam on fenal blood flow and tubular function during aortic cross-clamping in anaesthetized dogs,” Eur J Anaesthesia, 2000 Aug.;17(8);491-8 Abstract Only. |
Heyman et al.,“ Pathophysiology of Radiocontrast Nephropathy, A Role for Medullary Hypoxia,” Invest Radiol, 1999;34:685-691. |
Hobbs, et al., “An Update on Nesiritide for Treatment of Decompensated Heart Failure,” Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs, 2001, 10(5):935-942. |
Houghton, et al., “Basal and Reserve Renal Artery Blood Flow: Effect of Endothelium-Dependent and Independent Vasoactive Agonists and Radiographcl Contrast Medium in Two Patients”, J invas Cardiol 2000,12: 211-215. |
Iannone at al., “Effect of Primary Balloon Expandable Renal Artery Stents on Long-Term Patency, Renal Function, and Blood Pressure in Hypertensive and Renal Insufficient Patients with Renal Artery Stenosis,” Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn., vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 243-250, Mar. 1996. Abstract Only. |
Jacobs et al., “Reduced Renal Failure Following Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair by Selective Perfusion,” Eur. J. Cardlothorac. Surg., vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 201-205, Aug. 1998. Abstract Only. |
Katsumata et al., “Newly-Developed Catheter for Cardio-Renal Assist During Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation,” Kyobu Geka, vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 767-770. Aug. 1993. Abstract Only. |
Kay, et al., Acetylcysteine for Prevention of Acute Deterioration of Renal Function Following Elective Coronary Angiography and Intervention, JAMA, vol. 289 No. 5, (Feb. 5, 2003). |
Kehrer et al., “Construction and Experimental Application of a Catheter for Selective Arterial Kidney Perfusion in Situ”, Urological Research, 1985, 13:85-89. |
Kim at al., “Fluoroscopic Landmarks for Optimal Visualization of the Proximal Renal Arteries,” JVIR, 10:37-39 (1999). |
Kini et al., “A Protocol for Prevention of Radiographic Contrast Nephropathy During Pecutanous Coronary Intervention,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2002, 55:169-173. |
Kini, et al., “Managing the High-Risk Patient: Experience with Fenoldopam, a Selective Dopamine Receptor Agonist in Prevention of Radiocontrast Nephropathy During Precutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Rev Cardiovasc Med.2001, 2(suppl 1):S19-S25. |
Kobayashi et al., “Experimental Study on the Usefulness of the Autoperfusion Balloon Catheter in Maintaining the Blood Supply to the Distal Organs,” Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 682-684, May 25, 1992. Abstract Only. |
Lass et al., “Cardiovascular and Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Intravenous Infusions of the Selective DA1 Agonist, Fenoldopam, Used Alone or in Combination With Dopamine and Dobutamine”, Circulation 1988;78;1310-1315. |
Levin, Howard et al., “Reversal of Chronic Ventricular Dilation in Patients with End-Stage Cardiomyopathy by Prolonged Mechanical Unloading,” Circulation vol. 91, No. 11, pp. 2717-2718, Jun. 1, 1995. |
Linden et al., “The Nature of the Atrial Receptors Responsible for a Reflex Decrease in Activity in Renal Nerves in the Dog,” The Physiological Society, pp. 31-40, (1980). |
Madyoon, “Clinical Experience with the Use of Fenoldopam for Prevention of Radiocontrast Hephropathy etc,” Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2001, 2(suppl 1 );S26-S30. |
Madyoon, “Use of Fenoldopam to Prevent Radiocontrast Nephropathy in High-Risk Patients,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2001;53:341-345. |
Margulies at al., “Intra-Arterial Atrial Natriuretic Factor (ANF) Attenuates Radiocontrast-Induced Nephropathy in Humans.,” Renal Pathology, unknown date, pp. 666, Abstract only. |
Margulies at al.,“ Induction and Prevention of Radiocontrast-induced Nephropathy in Dogs with Heart Failure”, Kidney Int. 1990; vol. 38:1101-1108. |
Masaki at al., “In Situ Perfusion by Retrograde Cannulation of a Tumor Artery Nephron-Sparing Surgery,” Int. J. Urol, vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 161-165. Jul. 1995. Abstract Only. |
Mason at al., “Renal Dysfunction After Arteriography,” JAMA, 1985;253:1001-1004. |
Mathis et al., “Use of a Guide Catheter as a Temporary Stent During, Microcatheter Intervention,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol, vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 932-933. May, 1998. Abstract Only. |
Mathur, “The Role of the DA1 Receptor Agonist Fenoldopam in the Management of Critically Ill, Transplant, and Hypertensive Patients,” Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2003;4(Supp 1):S35-S40. |
Mathur, et al., “The Effects of Fenoldopam, a Selective Dopamine Receptor Agonist, on Renal Hemodynamics in Normotensive Subjects,” Crit Cre Med Sep. 1999;27(9):1832-1837, Abstract only. |
McCarthy, “Animal Models in Medical Device Development and Qualification,” Charles River Laboratories, vol. 10(2)1997. |
McCullough et al., “Acute Renal Failure After Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Relationship to Mortality,” Am J Med. 1997;103:368-375. |
Mehran, et al., “A Risk Score for Prediction of Contrast Induced Nephropathy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Retrieved from the Internet [Online]: www.abstractsonline.com/viewer, Mar. 31, 2003. |
Mehran, et al., “Radiocontrast-Induced Acute Renal Failure: Allocations and Outcomes,” Rev Cardiovasc Med 2001;2(suppl1):S9-S13. |
Middleton, “IschemIc Disease of the Kidney: How and Why to Consider Revascularization,” J. Nephrol., vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 123-136, May-Jun. 1998. Abstract Only. |
Miller, at al., “Effects of Fenoldopam on Renal Blood Flow and Tubular Function Following Supraerenal Aortic Cross-Clamping,” Ann Vasc Surg, 2003, Published online Oct. 23, 2003. Abstract Only. |
Mintz, et al., “Radiocontrast-Induced Nephropathy and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 2003; 4(5):639-652. |
Mueller, et al., “Prevention of Contrast Media-Associated Nephropathy,” Arch Intern med, Feb. 2002, vol. 162, pp. 329-336. |
Nohria, et al., Medical Management of Advanced Heart Failure, JAMA, Feb. 6, 2002; vol. 287, No. 5, pp. 628-640. |
Novick, “Atherosclerotic Ischemic Nephropathy. Epidemiology and Clinical Considerations,” Urol. Clin. North Am., vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 195-200, May 1994. Abstract Only. |
Paganini, et al., “Severity Scores and Outcomes With Acute Renal Failure in the ICU Setting,” Contrib Nephrol, 2001; 132: 181-195. |
Parfrey at al., “Contrast Material-Induced Renal Failure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus, Renal Insufficiency, or Both,” N Engl J Med 1989; 320:143-149. |
Patel at al., “Intravenous Fenoldopam Infusion in Severe Heart Failure,” Cardiovasc Drugs Ther , 1993;7:97-101. |
Postma et al., “Treatment of Renal Artery Stenosis with Intra-Arterial Stents,” Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, vol. 142, No. 39. pp. 2132-2137, Sep. 26, 1998. Abstract Only. |
Ramanathan, et al., “Ameliorating Contrast-Induced Nephropathy”, Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Nov. 2001, Retrieved from the Internet [Online]: www.invasivecardiology.comlfic—2001/jic—200111f6.html. |
Rebeiz, et al., “Radiocontrast Nephropathy: a Time for Affirmative Action, J Invasive Cardiology,” Jan. 2003; vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 23-24. |
Rihal, et al., “Incidence and Prognostic Importance of Acute Renal Failure After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Circulation, (May 14, 2002),105:2259-2264 |
Ritchie, et al., “Use of nonionic or Low Osmolar Contrast Agents in Cardiovascular Procedures,” Retrieved from the Internet [Online] www.acc.org/clinlcal/position/72543.htm, Jan. 22, 2003 |
Robinson, at al., “Congestive Heart Failure: Targeted Drug Therapy and Invasive Interventions”, Retrieved from the Internet [Online] www.speroff.com/articieslTextbook/66—CHF2.htm, printed Sep. 4, 2002. |
Rudnick at al., “Nephrotoxicity of Ionic and Noionic Contrast Media in 1196 Patients: A Randomized Trial,” Kidney International, 1995;47:254-261. |
Schwab et al., “Contrast Nephrotoxicity: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Nonionic and an Ionic Radiographic Contrast Agent,” N Engl J Med, 1989,320:149-153. |
Seiter, H. et al., “Modified T-Catheter and its Use for Transvenous Hypothermic in Situ Perfusion in the Surgical Restoration of the Kidney with Staghom Calculi,” Z. Urol Nephrol., vol. 76 No. 6 pp. 403-406, Jun. 1983. Abstact Only. |
Shusterman et al., “Fenoldopam, But Not Nitroprusside, Improves Renal Function in Severely Hypertensive Patients With Impaired Renal Funcion,” Am J of Medicine, 95:161-168 (1993). |
Solomon et al., “Effects of Saline, Mannitol, and Furosemide on Accute Decreases in Renal Function Induced by Radiocontrast Agents.,” N Engl J Med 1994; vol. 331 No. 21 pp. 1416-1420. |
Stevens et al., “A Prospective Randomized Trial of Prevention Measures in Patients at High Risk for Contrast Nephropathy,” J Am Coli Cardiol, 1999;33:403-411. |
Strick et al., “Direct Measurement of Renal Medullary Blood Flow in the Dog,” Am J. Physiol. 267 (Regulatory Integrative Compo Physiol. 36): R253-R2259, 1994. |
Suehiro, et al., “Selective Renal Vasodilation and Active Renal Artery Perfusion Improve Renal Function in Dogs with Acute Heart Failure,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 298. No. 3 pp. 1154-1160 (2001). |
Taliercio et al., “Risks for Renal Dysfunction with Cardiac Angiography,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 1986;104:501-504. |
Thomas et al., “Glomerrular Filtration Dynamics During Renal Vasodilation with Acetylcholine in the Dog.,” Am. J. Physic. 244:F606-F611 (1983). |
Thomas et al., “Influence of Bradykinin and Papaverine on Renal and Glomerular Hemodynamics in Dogs.,” Renal Physiology, Basel 5:197-205 (1982). |
UIC College of Pharmacy, “Is Fenoidoparn (Corlopam) Useful for the Prevention of Contrast Media Associated Nephrotoxicity?”, Retrieved from the Internet [Online] www.uic.edu/pharmacy/services/di/fenoldopam.htm, Jan. 2003. |
Umrani, et al., “Beneficial Effects Offenoldopam Treatment on Renal Function in Streptozotcin-Induced Diabetic Rats,” Clin Exp Hypertens, Apr. 2002;24(3):207-19 Abstract Only. |
Vari et al., “Induction, Prevention and Mechanisms of Contrast Media-Induced Acute Renal Failure,” Kidney International, 1988; 33:669-707. |
Walker et al., “Use of a Balloon-Tipped Perfusion Catheter for Renal Preservation During Suprarenal Abdominal Aortic Operations,” J. Vasc. Surg., vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 337-339, Mar. 1985. Abstract Only. |
White et al., “Renal Artery Stent Placement: Utility in Lesions Difficult to Treat with Balloon Angioplasty,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 1445-1450, Nov. 15, 1997. Abstract Only. |
Williams et al., “Design and Testing of a High-FLO2 Autoperfusion Catheter: An Experimental Study,” J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., vol. 3. No. 2, pp. 285-290. May, 1992. Abstract Only. |
Zacherl, et al. “Periarterial Papaverine Applications Improves Intraoperative Kidney Function During Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy”, Journal of Surgical Research 103:268-271 (2002). |
Maydoon, Hooman et al., Fenoldopam for prevention of contrast-induced renal dysfunction in a high risk angiography population: A historically-controlled case series:, Circulation, vol. 104, No. Suppl 17, Oct. 23, 2001, p. II.185, XP009098219. |
Stone, G.W. et al., “Designand rational of Contrast—a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fenoldopam mesylate for the prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy”, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 2, No. Suppl.1, 2001, pp. 531-536, XP009098217. |
Thatipelli et al., “CT Angiography of Renal Artery Anatomy for Evaluting Embolic Protection Devices.” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2007: 18(7):842-846. |
Tumlin et al., “A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fenoldopam meysylate in the prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vo. 11, Sep. 2000, p. 135A, XP009098223. |
Van Der Zander et al., “Hypertension: Does Brain Natriuretic Paptide Have a Direct Renal Effect in Human Hypertensives?”, American Heart Association, 2003, 41, 119-123. |
Venkatamaran, “Prevention of acute renal failure,” Crit. Care Clin., 2005, 21(2), 281-289 (abstract). |
Weisberg et al., Risk of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients with and without diabetes mellutus, Kidney International, 1994, 45:259-265. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090318857 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60550632 | Mar 2004 | US | |
60550774 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11073421 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12549486 | US |