This invention generally relates to elevator sheaves and more particularly, to a unique belt guiding surface configuration on an elevator sheave.
Elevator systems are widely known and used. Typical arrangements include an elevator cab that moves between landings in a building, for example to transport passengers or cargo to different levels in the building. A load bearing member, such as a rope or a belt typically supports the weight of the cab as it moves through the hoistway.
As the cab moves through the hoistway, the load bearing member typically moves over at least one sheave. In some instances the sheave is a drive sheave, which is coupled to a motorized mechanism for moving the elevator cab as desired. In other instances, sheaves are passive and move responsive to movement of the load bearing member.
While elevator sheaves have been in use for a long time, there is a need for an improvement in their design to maximize the longevity of the elevator system components, such as the load bearing member. For example, flat belts typically are subjected to overload stresses as the belt moves over the sheave. Additionally, because the elevator sheave axis is typically not perfectly aligned with the supporting mechanism axis, there is a tendency for the belt to move sideways along the sheave as the sheave rotates. While crowned sheave surfaces have been used to improve belt-tracking behavior, they have the associated drawback of introducing an overload in at least some of the cords in the central region of the belt. Coated steel belts in which a plurality of steel cords are imbedded in a polymer coating are particularly subject to such strain because those belts are designed to be axially very stiff. The cords are not uniformly stressed, resulting in uneven loading. Additionally, conventional crown designs do not adequately accommodate tracking behavior under all circumstances.
There is a need for an improved elevator sheave design that optimizes tracking performance of the load bearing member and reduces overall stress on the load bearing member. This invention addresses that need while avoiding the shortcomings and drawbacks of the prior art.
An exemplary disclosed sheave for use in an elevator system has a belt guiding surface that maximizes tracking capabilities while minimizing stress induced on the load bearing member.
An example sheave includes a sheave body that has a central axis about which the sheave rotates. A belt guiding surface includes a surface profile extending along at least a portion of the belt guiding surface. The surface profile preferably is defined by an equation that approximates an nth degree polynomial, of a distance from a selected reference point on the belt guiding surface, where n is a number greater than 2.
In one example, the belt guiding surface includes a central portion that is aligned parallel with the central axis of the sheave. Side portions on either side of the central portion preferably are defined by an equation that approximates an nth degree polynomial of a distance from a selected reference point on the belt guiding surface, where n is any number. The latter example is particularly useful for embodiments where the width of the load bearing member or belt is greater than one-half of the width of the belt guiding surface.
In another example, first side portions on either side of the central portion are defined by an nth degree polynomial. Second side portions extend from the first side portions toward outer edges of the sheave. The second side portions in this example have a linear profile. Accordingly, a sheave designed according to this example provides three distinct zones on each side of a plane of symmetry through a center of the sheave.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiments. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The belt 24 is received upon a belt guiding surface 26 that extends between edges 28 and 30 on the illustrated sheave. The raised edges 28 and 30 are not included in another example sheave. The belt rides along the surface 26 as the sheave rotates about a central axis 34. The belt guiding surface preferably includes a surface profile along at least a portion of the width of the belt guiding surface. The surface profile preferably provides an at least partially crowned surface along which the belt rides on the sheave. As can be appreciated from
In one example, the surface profile is approximated by a higher order polynomial equation. This equation may be expressed as y=|xn| where n is a number greater than 2, y is along an axis perpendicular to the sheave axis of rotation 34 and x is a distance measured from a reference point 40 on the belt guiding surface 26 in a direction parallel to the sheave axis of rotation. In the illustrated example, the reference point 40 is at a central location along the width of the belt guiding surface 26.
The example surface profiles maximize the tracking behavior of the belt 24 on the belt guiding surface 26 while minimizing the stresses on the belt caused by the shape of the profile. The example surface profiles enhance tracking robustness because they maintain adequate spacing between the edges on a belt and the sides of the sheave.
In examples as shown in
Side portions 44 and 46 of the surface profile preferably extend between the central portion 42 and the edges 28 and 30 of the belt guiding surface, respectively. Each of the side portions 44 and 46 preferably is approximated by the equation y=xn where n is any number. In the example of
A crown design as shown in
Second side portions 48 and 50 extend between the first side portions 46 and 44, respectively, and the edges of the belt guiding surface 26. In this example, the second side portions 48 and 50 have a surface profile that is linear. In the illustrated example, the belt guiding surface 26 is symmetrical about a plane through a center of the sheave (i.e., a vertical plane extending into the page).
In examples as shown in
In the figures, transitions between portions of the guiding surfaces 26 are somewhat exaggerated for illustration. In an example sheave, the guiding surface is machined from a single piece of material and presents a continuous, uninterrupted surface across the entire sheave.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to what has been disclosed above may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2004/025211 | 8/4/2004 | WO | 00 | 1/17/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/022686 | 3/2/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
489323 | Noble et al. | Jan 1893 | A |
1592418 | Brownell | Apr 1926 | A |
2274512 | Weimer | Jul 1941 | A |
2966065 | Renner | Dec 1960 | A |
3066794 | Mulheren et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3288338 | Morrow | Nov 1966 | A |
3789682 | Holz | Feb 1974 | A |
3851535 | Presentey | Dec 1974 | A |
4586915 | Cathey et al. | May 1986 | A |
4718520 | Schroder | Jan 1988 | A |
4991784 | Schmid | Feb 1991 | A |
4995855 | Hasebe et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002157 | Heikkinen | Mar 1991 | A |
5382761 | Amano | Jan 1995 | A |
5411444 | Nakamura et al. | May 1995 | A |
5870924 | Fahimi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6041476 | deNormand | Mar 2000 | A |
6206796 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6371448 | De Angelis | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401871 | Baranda et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6416433 | Linnenbrugger | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419208 | Baranda et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6488123 | Pitts et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
20040256180 | Eichhorn et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050266947 | Miyata | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20100236869 | Fargo et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
580601 | Nov 1924 | FR |
622514 | Jan 1987 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Abramowitz et al, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Jun. 1964, National Bureau of Standards, vol. 55, p. 14. |
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US04/25211, dated Sep. 28, 2006. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US04/25211 dated Sep. 28, 2006. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability relating to International Application No. PCT/US2004/025211 mailed Feb. 15, 2007. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 12 15 7343 mail Mar. 29, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070252121 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |