This application is based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-031830 filed on Feb. 13, 2008, of which content is incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a sheet ejecting device, and more particularly to a sheet ejecting device that is suited to be employed in an image forming apparatus such as an electrophotographic copying machine or a printer, or in an after-processing device such as a finisher connected to the image forming apparatus.
2. Description of Related Art
When a printed sheet is ejected from an image forming apparatus onto a sheet tray through a pair of ejection rollers, if the sheet is soft, trouble will occur. Specifically, the leading part of the soft sheet bends downward, and the sheet interferes with sheets already ejected and stacked on the tray. Thereby, the sheets stacked on the tray will be out of alignment.
JP2005-263418A discloses a way of avoiding this trouble. According to this conventional way, a currently ejected sheet is curved in a direction perpendicular to the sheet ejecting direction by use of a spring or an elastic member, so that the leading edge of the currently ejected sheet will be in contact with a stack of sheets on the tray at a point farther from the pair of ejection rollers. Thereby, the leading part of the currently ejected sheet is prevented from interfering with the stack of sheets on the tray and from pushing the stack of sheets on the tray out of alignment. However, since the currently ejected sheet is curved and strengthened evenly from the leading edge to the trailing edge, the sheet may jump out of the pair of ejection rollers with great force, and consequently, the sheet may push the stack of sheets on the tray out of alignment.
a shows a case of ejecting a sheet S onto a sheet tray 110 while not strengthening the sheet S. If the sheet S is very soft, the leading part of the sheet S bends downward after coming out of the ejection rollers 101 and interferes with a stack of sheets S′ at a position near the ejection rollers 101, and the stack of sheets S′ is pushed.
As
d shows a case of ejecting a sheet S2 of a relatively small size while strengthening the sheet S2. In this case, the leading edge of the strengthened sheet S2 comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′, and while the sheet S2 keeps strong, the trailing edge of the sheet S2 comes out of the ejection rollers 101. Therefore, the sheet S2 is tense between the ejection rollers 101 and the stack of sheets S′, and the sheet S2 comes out of the ejection rollers 101 with great force. Thereby, the sheet S2 cannot be in alignment with the stack of sheets S′.
An object of the present invention is to provide a sheet ejecting device for ejecting a sheet onto a tray while strengthening the sheet, in which the sheet is prevented from pushing a stack of sheets on the tray out of alignment, and in which the sheet is ejected in alignment with the stack of sheets on the tray.
In an aspect of the present invention, a sheet ejecting device for ejecting printed sheets one by one comprises: a pair of ejection rollers for ejecting a sheet; a strengthener, provided in a sheet ejection route, for strengthening a sheet; a tray for receiving sheets ejected via the pair of ejection rollers and holding the sheets in a stack; and a mechanism for changing a distance between a contact point of a currently ejected sheet with the stack of sheets held on the tray and the pair of ejection rollers.
In the sheet ejecting device, since a sheet is strengthened and ejected, the currently ejected sheet is prevented from bending downward, and thereby, is prevented from pushing a stack of sheets on the tray out of alignment. Moreover, since the contact point of the currently ejected sheet with the stack of sheets on the tray is moved closer to the pair of ejection rollers, the force provided for the sheet by the strengthener is cancelled. Accordingly, even if the sheet has a relatively small dimension in the sheet ejecting direction, there is no possibility that the sheet may jump out of the pair of ejection rollers with great force, and the sheet is prevented from pushing the stack of sheets on the tray out of alignment.
This and other objects and features of the present invention will be apparent from the following description with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a and 6b show an arrangement of strengthening wheels,
a-11d are illustrations of sheet ejection performed by a conventional sheet ejecting device.
Sheet ejecting devices according to embodiments of the present invention are hereinafter described with reference to the drawings. In the following embodiments, the same members and parts are provided with the same reference symbols, and repetitious descriptions are omitted.
As
A printed sheet S is fed from a direction indicated by an arrow “A” into a nip portion of the ejection rollers 11 and is ejected onto the tray 20 by the rotation of the ejection rollers 11. In this moment, the strengthener 15 curves the sheet S in a direction perpendicular to the ejecting direction “A” such that the curvature extends in the ejecting direction “A”, and the curved and strengthened sheet S is ejected onto the tray 20.
The strengthened sheet S comes into contact with a stack of sheets S′ on the tray 20 at a point farther from the ejection rollers 11 than a point at which a non-strengthened sheet comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′ on the tray 20. Therefore, there is no possibility that the sheet S will push the stack of sheets S′ out of alignment.
A specified time after the leading edge of the sheet S is detected by the sensor 19, and specifically, between the time when the leading edge of the sheet S comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′ and the time when the sheet S passes through the nip portion of the ejection rollers 11, the tray 20 is lifted up by a specified distance (from the position shown by the dashed line to the position shown by the solid line). Accordingly, the point B at which the sheet S currently ejected via the ejection rollers 11 comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′ comes nearer to the ejection rollers 11, that is, the distance L between the contact point B and the nip portion of the pair of ejection rollers 11 becomes shorter. Thereby, the force provided for the sheet S by the strengthener 15 is cancelled. Thus, when the sheet S passes through the ejection rollers 11, the sheet S is no longer strengthened, and there is no possibility that the sheet S may jump out of the ejection rollers 11 with great force. Consequently, the sheets S′ can be kept in alignment on the tray 20. After the sheet S is ejected onto the tray 20, the tray 20 is lifted down to the initial level.
A second embodiment of the present invention, which is shown by
Like in the first embodiment, a printed sheet S is strengthened by the strengthener 15 and is ejected onto the tray 20. The strengthened sheet S comes into contact with a stack of sheets S′ on the tray 20 at a point farther from the ejection rollers 11 than a point at which a non-strengthened sheet comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′ on the tray 20. Therefore, there is no possibility that the sheet S will push the stack of sheets S′ out of alignment.
A specified time after the leading edge of the sheet S is detected by the sensor 19, and specifically, between the time when the leading edge of the sheet S comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′ and the time when the sheet S passes through the nip portion of the pair of ejection rollers 11, the tray 20 is pushed to stand such that the angle θ1 becomes larger (from the position shown by the dashed line to the position shown by the solid line). Accordingly, the point B at which the sheet S currently ejected via the ejection rollers 11 comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′ comes nearer to the ejection rollers 11, that is, the distance L between the contact point B and the nip portion of the ejection rollers 11 becomes shorter. Thereby, the force provided for the sheet S by the strengthener 15 is cancelled. Thus, when the sheet S passes through the ejection rollers 11, the sheet S is no longer strengthened, and there is no possibility that the sheet S may jump out of the ejection rollers 11 with great force. Consequently, the sheets S′ can be kept in alignment on the tray 20. After the sheet S is ejected onto the tray 20, the tray 20 is returned such that the angle θ1 becomes to the initial value.
A third embodiment of the present invention, which is shown by
Like in the first embodiment, a printed sheet S is strengthened by the strengthener 15 and is ejected onto the tray 20. The strengthened sheet S comes into contact with a stack of sheets S′ on the tray 20 at a point farther from the pair of rollers 11 than a point at which a non-strengthened sheet comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′ on the tray 20. Therefore, there is no possibility that the sheet S will push the stack of sheets S′ out of alignment.
A specified time after the leading edge of the sheet S is detected by the sensor 19, and specifically, between the time when the leading edge of the sheet S comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′ and the time when the sheet S passes through the nip portion of the ejection rollers 11, the sheet ejection angle θ2 is increased. Specifically, an upper roller 11a of the ejection rollers 11 is somewhat pivoted on a lower roller 11b from the position shown by the dashed line to the position shown by the solid line. Thereby, the point B at which the sheet S currently ejected via the ejection rollers 11 comes into contact with the stack of sheets S′ comes nearer to the ejection rollers 11, that is, the distance L between the contact point B and the nip portion of the ejection rollers 11 becomes shorter. Thereby, the force provided for the sheet S by the strengthener 15 is cancelled. Thus, when the sheet S passes through the ejection rollers 11, the sheet S is no longer strengthened, and there is no possibility that the sheet S may jump out of the ejection rollers 11 with great force. Consequently, the sheets S′ can be kept in alignment on the tray 20. After the sheet S is ejected onto the tray 20, the upper roller 11a is returned such that the sheet ejection angle θ2 becomes to the initial value.
Now, the strengthener 15 is described. The strengthener 15 is made of metal, resin or an elastic material and is located in a position somewhat advancing into the sheet ejection route. As shown by
As shown by
Referring to
In each of the first, the second and the third embodiments, the distance L between the nip portion of the ejection rollers 11 and the contact point B of the sheet S with the stack of sheets S′ after shortened by the operation of the driving section 25, 26 or 27 may be determined based on the size of the sheet S (the length of the sheet S in the ejecting direction), the kind of the sheet S, the environmental conditions, etc.
In
In other words, the maximum distance L4 is calculated by subtracting the distance L2 and the distance L3 from the length of the sheet S in the ejecting direction. In the case of A4-vertical sheet ejection, the length of the sheet S in the ejecting direction “A” is 297 mm. Accordingly, the distance L4 is calculated by 297−50−50, and the result is 197 mm. Therefore, the distance L should be designed to be equal to or smaller than 197 mm. In the case of A4-lateral sheet ejection, the length of the sheet S in the ejecting direction “A” is 210 mm. Accordingly, the distance L4 is calculated by 210−50−50, and the result is 110 mm. Therefore, the distance L should be designed to be equal to or smaller than 110 mm.
When the sheet S is ejected, the sheet S bends down by its own weight. The degree of the bend-down (the strength) of the sheet S depends on the kind of the sheet S (the weight per square meter, that is, whether to be thin paper, ordinary paper or thick paper and whether to be recycled paper) and the environmental conditions (temperature and humidity). Therefore, it is preferred that the distance L is changed in accordance with the kind of the sheet S and the environmental conditions.
Table 1 shows an exemplary setting of the distance L in accordance with the kind of sheet. Here, thin paper is paper with a weight per square meter smaller than 60 g/m2. Ordinary paper is paper with a weight per square meter within a range from 60 g/m2 to 90 g/m2. Thick paper is paper with a weight per square meter greater than 90 g/m2.
Further, recycled paper is not so strong as non-recycled paper, and the distance L in the case of ejecting recycled paper may be set longer than the distance L in the case of ejecting non-recycled paper with the same weight per square meter. Table 2 shows an exemplary setting.
Moreover, when the temperature and/or the humidity is high, it is preferred that the distance L is set to be longer. Table 3 shows an exemplary setting of the distance L in accordance with whether the sheet ejecting device is under high temperature and high humidity, under ordinary temperature and ordinary humidity, or under low temperature and low humidity.
Referring to
It is possible to combine the first embodiment, the second embodiment and the third embodiment with one another. For example, a lift-up of the tray 20 and a change of the ejection angle θ2 may be combined with each other, or alternatively, a change of the angle θ1 of the tray 20 and a change of the ejection angle θ2 may be combined with each other. Further, the detailed constructions of the tray 20, the ejection rollers 11 and the strengthener 15 may be arbitrarily designed.
Although the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments above, various changes and modifications are possible to those who are skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are to be understood as being within the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2008-031830 | Feb 2008 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4605211 | Sonobe | Aug 1986 | A |
5139254 | Yamashita et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5318401 | Mandel | Jun 1994 | A |
5350169 | Hiroi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
6076825 | Kato et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6109606 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6145826 | Kawata | Nov 2000 | A |
6390466 | Sanmiya | May 2002 | B1 |
20020171197 | Ardery et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005-263418 | Sep 2005 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090200736 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |