The present invention relates to a mechanism for moving a stack of sheet material. In particular, the invention is a mechanism for lifting a stack of sheet media for feeding individual sheets into a feed path.
The following applications have been filed by the Applicant with application No. 11/482,981:
The disclosures of these co-pending applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Various methods, systems and apparatus relating to the present invention are disclosed in the following US Patents/Patent Applications filed by the applicant or assignee of the present invention:
The disclosures of these applications and patents are incorporated herein by reference.
Sheet material is typically supplied and stored in stacks. To use the individual sheets, they first need to be separated from each other. The paper feed systems in printers, scanners, copiers or faxes are a common examples of the need to sequentially feed individual sheets from a stack into a paper feed path. Given the widespread use of such devices, the invention will be described with particular reference to its use within this context. However, this is purely for the purposes of illustration and should not be seen as limiting the scope of the present invention. It will be appreciated that the invention has much broader application and may be suitable for many systems involving the handling of stacked sheet material.
Printers, copiers, scanners, faxes and the like, sequentially feed sheets of paper from a stack in the paper tray, past the imaging means (e.g. printhead), to a collect tray. There are many methods used to separate single sheets from the stack. Some of the more common methods involve air jets, suction feet, rubberized picker rollers, rubberized pusher arms and so on. In the systems that use a pick up roller or pusher arm, it is important to control the force with which the roller touches the top sheet of the stack to drive, push or drag it off the top. The friction between the top sheet and the pusher or roller needs to exceed the friction between the top sheet and the sheet underneath. Too much force can cause two or more sheets to be drawn from the stack (known as ‘double picks’), and too little will obviously fail to draw any sheets.
Sheet feed mechanisms should also be relatively simple, compact and have low power demands. For example, consumer expectations in the SOHO (Small Office/Home Office) printer market are directing designers to reduce the desktop footprint, improve feed reliability for a variety of paper grades while maintaining or reducing manufacturing costs.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a sheet feed mechanism includes a chassis for supporting a stack of sheets; a top sheet engaging member for engaging a top most sheet of the stack; a stack engaging structure, a first end of the stack engaging structure engaging the stack of sheets to bias a top most sheet of the stack of sheets against the top sheet engaging member, the stack engaging structure being supported from the chassis by a resilient member; a friction surface extending perpendicularly from a second end of the stack engaging structure opposite to the first end; a lock mechanism having a lock arm hingedly connected to the chassis, the lock mechanism including a biased contact foot for engaging the friction surface to retard a rectilinear movement of the stack engaging structure; and an actuator for engaging and disengaging the contact foot from the friction surface.
Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring to
Referring to
As the cam 20 rotates out of engagement with the engagement arm 28, the lift spring 10 pushes the lift arm 8, locking surface 18 and locking arm 14 upwards until the bearing surface 34 abuts the stop 36 on the chassis 2. The cam 20 continues to rotate until it contacts the disengagement arm 30. Further rotation presses the disengagement arm 30 towards the bearing surface 34 against the bias of the lock spring 38. This actuates the lever to lift the contact foot 32 out of engagement with the friction surface 18. This unlocks the lift arm 8 from the lock arm 14. This allows the lift spring 10 to elevate the stack 4 until the top-most sheet 40 engages the picker roller 6 and is drawn away from the remainder of the stack.
Referring to
Turning to
The embodiment shown does not use a U-shaped member but instead configures the lock arm 14 to act as the engagement arm 28 as well. When the cam 20 contacts the engagement arm 28, it rotates anti-clockwise about the hinge 16. The contact foot 32 maintains locking engagement with the friction surface 18 because the spring 38 continues to bias the disengagement arm 30 in a clockwise direction despite the rotation of the engagement arm in an anti clockwise direction.
In fact the bearing surface 34 rotating anti clockwise tends to maintain the gap bridged by the spring 38 so that the biasing force remains relatively uniform.
The embodiment shown in
The lift arm 8 is positioned directly beneath the picker roller 6 with the distal end 50 of the lift arm positioned beneath the leading edge of the stack of sheets (not shown). Initially the lifter arm is held in a fully depressed configuration so that its distal end is flush with the paper support platen 52 in the feed tray 48. The lift arm 8 is forced into this initial position using the lift arm reset lever 54 described in greater detail below.
Turning to
In
Also shown in
Referring to
The locked configuration of the U-shaped member 22 and the arcuate friction arm 18 is best shown in
The invention has been described here by way of example only. Still workers in this field will readily recognise many variations and modifications, which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the broad invented concept.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/505,520 filed Jul. 19, 2009, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,726,647 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/482,981 filed Jul. 10, 2006, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,571,906, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4418903 | Landa | Dec 1983 | A |
6315282 | Chua et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6485014 | Lin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485015 | Yen et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6499736 | Hsieh | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6783126 | Amamoto | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6953190 | Shin | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7571906 | Dyer et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20030193128 | Takai | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040041329 | Hiraoka | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0083025 | Jul 1983 | EP |
0246703 | Nov 1987 | EP |
60-128139 | Jul 1985 | JP |
05-062125 | Mar 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100225049 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12505520 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 12783509 | US | |
Parent | 11482981 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 12505520 | US |