This application is a §371 application from PCT/FR2010/052527 filed Nov. 25, 2010, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This invention relates to a sheet, a method and a device for manufacturing a sheet and a method and a device for identifying a sheet. It applies, in particular, to the authentication of a paper sheet.
Many means are known for authenticating a sheet, by giving it recognizable characteristics during the manufacture of a sheet. For example, a watermark makes it possible to modify a sheet's local transparency. Similarly, inserting materials, such as fibers or bands, into the paper should allow the sheets formed with this paper to be made forgery-proof.
However, these techniques are very costly and are reproduced, more or less closely, by counterfeiters.
There are techniques for memorizing physical characteristics of a sheet, for example the shape of fibers in a given portion of the sheet. However, recognition of the sheet on the basis of a new analysis is very sensitive to variations in the analysis angle, particularly of the image sensor, and in the end can only be used in a laboratory.
The aim of the present invention is to remedy these drawbacks.
To this end, according to a first aspect, this invention envisages a planar sheet, characterized in that it comprises:
Thanks to these provisions, the sheet is protected in three ways. Firstly, determining the presence of an invisible mark provides a first level of protection. Secondly, the precision of the superimposition of the marks gives a second level of protection since it is very difficult to superimpose the printing of two marks on two opposite surfaces of a sheet with precision. In addition, the unique content of at least one mark borne by the sheet allows the sheet to be identified unequivocally.
According to particular features, in at least one pair of vertically adjacent marks each printed mark is invisible.
Detecting the sheet's protection is thus even more difficult.
According to particular features, each of the marks of at least one pair of vertically adjacent marks has unique content.
Identification of the sheet is therefore even stronger.
According to particular features, at least one said invisible mark is a two-dimensional barcode. Thanks to these provisions, once an image of the mark has been taken, standard processing systems can be used.
According to particular features, at least one said invisible mark is a copy-protection mark. Thanks to these provisions, it can be determined whether the sheet is an original or a copy.
According to particular features, at least one invisible mark is formed with a varnish. Thanks to these provisions, the mark is especially durable.
According to particular features, the content of at least one mark is representative of the position of an invisible mark on the sheet. Thus, to find an invisible mark, the content of another mark, e.g. visible, is used.
According to a second aspect, this invention envisages a method of manufacturing a planar sheet, characterized in that it comprises:
According to a third aspect, this invention envisages a method of identifying a sheet, characterized in that it comprises:
According to particular features, at least one of the steps of capturing an image comprises a step of depositing visible material on the mark of which an image is captured.
According to a fourth aspect, this invention envisages a device for manufacturing a planar sheet, characterized in that it comprises:
According to a fifth aspect, this invention envisages a device for identifying a sheet, characterized in that it comprises:
As the particular characteristics, advantages and aims of this manufacturing method, this identification method, this manufacturing device and this identification device are similar to those of the sheet that is the subject of this invention, as described in brief above, they are not repeated here.
Other advantages, aims and particular features of the present invention will become apparent from the description that will follow, made, as a non-limiting example, with reference to the drawings included in an appendix, in which:
Note that the figures are not to scale.
Sheet 100 is a planar sheet. It is, for example, made of paper, laminated paper, fabric or plastic. In the case shown, the sheet 100 is a standard-format sheet. The surfaces 105 and 150 are therefore coplanar.
Printed mark 110 is a visible mark positioned at the bottom of the page. The content of mark 110 varies from one sheet to another and, preferably, is unique for the sheet in question. In the embodiment described, mark 110 is a two-dimensional barcode, also called “Datamatrix”. Printed mark 115 is a visible mark placed next to mark 110. The content of mark 115 varies from one sheet to another and, preferably, is unique for the sheet in question. In the embodiment described, mark 115 is a copy-protection mark, i.e. its characteristics degrade in a measurable way during copying of the sheet 100.
For example, a copy-protection mark comprises a high level of redundancies and is printed with a resolution, linked to the print quality, such that, when printed, as a result of ad-hoc random physical phenomena, the redundancy rate to be utilized for correcting and reading the content of the copy-protection mark is high, preferably greater than 10 percent. Thus, a copy of the copy-protection mark, made with printing means of a similar quality to those used for the initial printing, causes an increase in the quantity of redundancies, to be utilized for correcting and reading the content of the copy-protection mark, that can be detected so as to recognize an original from a copy.
The reader may refer to sheet WO 2009 004172 (PCT FR2008/00743) for the determination and manufacture of the mark 115.
The content of marks 110 and 115 is correlated, i.e. the content of one of the marks 110 or 115 is a function of the content of the other mark.
Printed marks 120, 125 and 130 are invisible marks. They are formed, for example, with varnish or an enhanced invisible ink, water-based. Mark 120 has a fixed content, i.e. common to a set of sheets. Marks 125 and 130 have a unique content, i.e. only the sheet 100 bears them.
Printed marks 155, 160 and 165 are invisible marks. They are formed, for example, with varnish. Mark 155 is vertically adjacent to mark 120, i.e. it has the same dimensions as mark 120 and its outline is vertically adjacent to the outline of mark 120. Marks 120 and 155 therefore have symmetrical shapes with respect to an axis of the sheet's plane. Mark 160 is vertically adjacent to mark 125. Lastly, mark 165 is not vertically adjacent to any mark of the first surface 105. The content of marks 155 and 160 is unique.
Thus, in at least one pair of vertically adjacent marks 120-155 or 125-160, at least one of the marks of the pair has unique content.
According to variants, the sheet that is the subject of this invention does not comprise any visible mark.
For example, this information comprises:
During a step 310, a print position for at least one pair of vertically adjacent marks is determined. For example, this position is determined randomly.
Then, during a step 315, a copy-protection type of mark is formed representative of at least one part of the information obtained during step 305.
During a step 320, a two-dimensional barcode type of mark is formed representative of at least one part of the information obtained during step 305.
During a step 325, a mark is formed representative of the position of each pair of vertically adjacent marks.
Preferably, during steps 315, 320 and 325, error correction codes (or FEC, for “forward error correction”) are inserted into the content of the marks. The proportion of FEC redundancies is higher for the copy-protection marks than for the two-dimensional barcodes.
It is noted that the marks coming from steps 315, 320 and 325 are files of dots, e.g. binary, representing the print values to be realized. For example, in the case of binary marks, for each dot to be printed, one value represents printing and another value represents the absence of printing.
During a step 330, the two surfaces of a sheet are printed simultaneously to form on it the set of marks, visible or invisible, vertically adjacent or not, described with reference to
Then, during a step 410, a visible mark on the sheet is read.
During a step 415, the position of each invisible mark is determined according to the content of the visible mark.
During a step 420, the visible material is applied on the sheet, at the places where the invisible marks are located.
During a step 425, the excess visible material is removed from the places where the invisible marks are located, e.g. by applying and removing an adhesive in these places.
During a step 430, an image is captured of the invisible mark made visible by the remains of the visible material deposited, during steps 420 and 425.
It is noted that this image capture can be performed on the sheet or on an adhesive having removed an excess of visible material.
Steps 415 to 430 are repeated for the invisible marks borne on the two surface 105 and 150 of the sheet 100.
In a variant, steps 420 and 425 are eliminated and during step 430 a light with a non-visible wavelength and a sensor capable of capturing the light emitted, reflected or filtered by each invisible mark, are used to take an image of each invisible mark.
During a step 435, the information contained in the visible marks is determined. Preferably, error correction codes are utilized to correct the errors represented by the captured images and the quantity of FEC redundancies used to correct the errors of the copy-protection marks is measured.
During a step 440, it is determined, according to the redundancy quantity used to correct the copy-protection marks, whether the sheet is an original or a copy.
During a step 445, the precision of the superimposition of the vertically adjacent invisible marks is measured and, according to a limit value (e.g. a distance), it is determined whether the sheet is an original or a copy. To do this, the images are processed to determine the position of the center of each invisible mark, on each of the surfaces of the sheet, and the distance between the centers of two vertically adjacent invisible marks is determined.
During a step 450, an identity of the sheet is determined, according to the content of the marks borne by the sheet and, in particular, according to the content of the invisible marks.
It is noted that steps 435 and 445 can be performed locally or remotely, e.g. by a server.
The central processing unit 510 is designed to implement the steps illustrated in
The computer network 520 is, for example, the Internet network.
The printer 515 is designed to simultaneously print marks on the two surfaces of the sheet 535. In a variant, marks on the two surfaces are printed successively.
The central processing unit 610 is designed to implement the steps illustrated in
The computer network 620 is, for example, the Internet network. The image capture means 615 are, for example, comprised of a visible or invisible light source and an image sensor designed to supply an image representative of a visible or invisible mark borne by a sheet 635.
This invention finds applications in particular in the manufacture of paper that is mostly or completely uniform, on which information can be written or printed, in order to subsequently certify that the sheet thus formed is an original.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09 05664 | Nov 2009 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2010/052527 | 11/25/2010 | WO | 00 | 7/19/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/064504 | 6/3/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6089611 | Blank | Jul 2000 | A |
6755443 | Fresnel | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20060131425 | Stenzel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070276558 | Kim | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100201995 | Yoshida | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110071944 | Heiden et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007254655 | Jul 2009 | AU |
2796922 | Feb 2001 | FR |
2009004172 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130299573 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |