The present invention relates to printable sheet constructions that are adapted to be fed into printers or copiers and indicia printed on different portions thereof and the portions thereafter separated into separate printed media, such as business cards. It further is concerned with methods for making those printing sheet constructions. Additionally, it relates to methods of using the sheet constructions to form the printed cards.
Small size media, such as business cards, ROLODEX rotary-type card file cards, party invitations and visitors cards, because of their small format, cannot be fed into and easily printed using today's ink jet printers, laser printers, photocopiers and other ordinary printing and typing machines. Therefore, one known method of producing small size media has been to print the desired indicia on different portions of a large sheet such as 8½ by 11 or 8½ by 14 or A4 size sheets, and then to cut the sheets with some type of cutting machine into the different portions or individual small size sheets or media with the printing on each of them. However, this method is disadvantageous because the user must have access to such a cutting machine, and the separate cutting step is cost and time inefficient.
To avoid this cutting step, another prior art product has the portions of the sheet which define the perimeters of the media (e.g., the business cards) formed by preformed perforation lines. (See, e.g., PCT International Publication No. WO 97/40979.) However, a problem with this product was that since these cards must be durable and professional looking, they had to be made from relatively thick and heavy paper. And the thick, heavy perforated sheets are relatively inflexible, such that they cannot be fed from a stack of such sheets using automatic paper feeders into the printers and copiers. One proposed solution to this feeding problem is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,704,317 ('317) to Hickenbotham. (This patent and all other patents and other publications mentioned anywhere in this disclosure are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.) The method of the '317 patent reduces the stiffness of the corners of the sheet as by scoring, slitting, die cutting or calendering. However, a number of problems with this method prevented it from becoming generally commercially acceptable.
Another attempted solution to the sheet feeding problem is that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,587 ('587) to Bishop et al. (See also U.S. Pat. No. 4,447,481 to Holmberg et al.) Pursuant to the '587 patent the sheetstock has a relatively thin portion on at least one of the longitudinal edges thereof which facilitates feeding the sheetstock into a printer or copier. The thin portion is removed from the sheet after printing. The individual printed cards are then separated from one another by pulling or tearing along the preformed microperforated lines. While the perforation ties remaining along the edges of the printed cards thereby formed are small, they are perceptible, giving the card a less than professional appearance and feel.
A card sheet construction which uses clean cut edges instead of the less desirable perforated edges is commercially available from Max Seidel and from Promaxx/“Paper Direct”, and an example of this product is shown in the drawings by
One of the problems with the prior art sheet product 100 is that printers have difficulty picking the sheets up, resulting in the sheets being misfed into the printers. In other words, it is difficult for the infeed rollers to pull the sheets past the separation tabs within the printers. Feeding difficulties are also caused by curl of the sheetstock 102 back onto itself. The “curl” causes the leading edge of the sheet to bend back and flex over the separation tabs. Since the sheetstock 102 is a relatively stiff product, it is difficult for the infeed rollers of the printer 120 to handle this problem.
Another problem with the prior art sheet 100 is a start-of-sheet, off-registration problem. In other words, the print is shifted up or down from its expected desired starting position below the top of the sheet. This off-registration problem is often related to the misfeeding problem discussed in the paragraph above. This is because if the printer is having difficulty picking up the sheet, the timing of the printer is effected. And this causes the print to begin at different places on the sheet, which is unacceptable to the users.
Directed to remedying the problems in and overcoming the disadvantages of the prior art, disclosed herein is a dry laminated sheet construction including printable media, such as business cards, ROLODEX type cards, party invitations, visitor cards or the like. A first step in the formation of this dry laminated sheet construction is to extrusion coat a low density polyethylene (LPDE) layer on a densified bleached kraft paper liner, thereby forming a film-coated liner sheet. Using a layer of hot melt adhesive, a facestock sheet is adhered to the film side of the liner sheet to form a laminated sheet construction web. A more generic description of the “dry peel” materials—the LPDE, and densified bleached kraft paper liner—is a film forming polymer coated onto a liner stock. The facestock sheet, the film layer and the adhesive layer together define a laminate facestock. (See U.S. Pat. No. 4,863,772 (Cross); see also U.S. Pat. No. 3,420,364 (Kennedy), U.S. Pat. No. 3,769,147 (Kamendat et al), U.S. Pat. No. 4,004,058 (Buros et al), U.S. Pat. No. 4,020,204 (Taylor et al), and U.S. Pat. No. 4,405,401 (Stahl)). The sheet construction (which also includes a facestock bonded to the film forming polymer) separates at the film-liner interface rather than the facestock-film interface, when the final construction is subjected to a peeling force.
According to one embodiment of this invention, a web of laminate facestock is calendered along one or both edges thereof to assist in subsequent printer feed of the printable media sheets. The calendered edges help prevent the multiple sheet feed-through, misfeed and registration problems of the prior art. Lines are die cut through the laminate facestock and to but not through the liner sheet. These facestock cut lines define the perimeters of blank business cards (or other printable media) and a surrounding waste paper frame. These die cut lines do not cause sheets to get caught in one another. This allows sheets to be effectively fed into printers. Lines are then cut through the liner sheet, but not through the laminate facestock, to form liner sheet strips on the back face of the laminate facestock. The liner sheet cut lines can each be straight lines or they can be curving, wavy lines. The lines can be horizontally (or vertically) straight across the sheet or diagonally positioned thereon. According to one alternative, the lines can extend only part way across the sheet, such as from both side edges, to only a central zone of the sheet. Further steps in the process are to sheet the web into individual sheets, stack and package them and distribute the packaged sheets through retail channels to end users.
The laminated (business card) sheets are unpackaged by the user and stacked into the feed tray of a printer or copier and individually and automatically fed, calendered edge first, into a printer (and particularly a horizontal feed ink jet printer) or copier where indicia is printed on each of the printable media (or blank business cards) on the sheet. After the printing operation, each of the printed media (or business cards) is peeled off of the liner sheet strips and out from the waste paper frame. The support structure formed by the strips and the frame is subsequently discarded. Alternatively, the support structure is peeled off of the printed business cards. The product, in either event, is a stack of cleanly printed business cards, each having clean die cut edges about its entire perimeter.
In other words, the adhesive layer securely bonds the facestock sheet to the LPDE film layer on the liner sheet. It bonds it such that the overall sheet construction separates or delaminates at the film-liner sheet interface, when the user peels the printed business cards and liner strips apart. That is, it does not separate at the facestock sheet interface. Additionally, the film-coated liner sheet does not significantly affect the flexibility of the sheet as it is fed through the printer. Rather, it is the thickness of the facestock which is the more significant factor. Thus, the facestock sheet needs to be carefully selected so as to not be so stiff that feeding or printing registration problems result.
Pursuant to some of the preferred embodiments of the invention, every other one of the strips is peeled off and removed from the sheet during the manufacturing process and before the sheet is fed into a printer or copier. The remaining strips cover a substantial number of the laminated facestock cut lines and extend onto the waste paper frame to hold the business card blanks and the sheet together as they are fed into and passed through the printer or copier. The remaining strips (and thus the facestock cut lines) preferably extend width-wise on the sheet or are perpendicular to the feed direction of the sheet to make the laminated sheet construction less stiff and more flexible as it passes into and through the printer or copier. By starting off with a single continuous liner sheet to form the strips, the final stripped product is flatter than the prior art products. Thus, it is less likely that the sheets will bow and snag together.
Other embodiments do not remove any of the strips before the sheet is fed into the printer or copier. In other words, the entire back side of the laminated facestock is covered by the liner sheet having a series of liner-sheet cut lines.
A further definition of the method of making this invention includes forming a roll of a web of dry laminate sheet construction comprising a liner sheet on a facestock sheet. The web is unwound under constant tension from the web and the edges of the web are calendered. The facestock sheet of the unwound web is die cut without cutting the liner sheet to form perimeter outlines of the printable media (business cards). The liner sheet is then die cut, without cutting the facestock sheet, to form liner strips. Alternating ones of the interconnected liner strips are removed as a waste liner matrix and rolled onto a roll and disposed of. The web is then sheeted into eleven by eight-and-a-half inch sheets, for example, or eight-and-a-half by fourteen or in A4 dimensions; the sheets are stacked, and the stacked sheets are packaged. The user subsequently removes the stack of sheets from the packaging and positions the stack or a portion thereof in an infeed tray of a printer or copier for a printing operation on the printable media or individually feeds them into the printer or copier. After the printing operation, the printed media are separated from the rest of the sheet, as previously described.
Sheet constructions of this invention appear to work on the following ink jet printers: HP550C, HP660C, HP722C, HP870Cse, Canon BJC620, Canon BJC4100, Epson Stylus Color II and Epson Stylus Color 600.
Another advantage of the embodiments of the present invention wherein alternate strips of the liner are removed before the printing operation is that a memory curl is less likely to be imparted or induced in the business cards from the liner sheet. Memory curl occurs when the facestock is removed from a full liner sheet. The liner strips are better than liner sheets since they reduce the amount of memory curl that occurs during removal of the facestock.
A further embodiment of this invention has a strip of the laminated facestock stripped away at one end of the sheet to leave a strip of the liner sheet extending out beyond the end of laminated facestock. This liner strip defines a thin infeed edge especially well suited for feeding the sheets into vertical feed printers and appears to work better than calendering the infeed edge. The opposite (end) edge of the laminated facestock can also be stripped away to leave an exposed liner sheet strip. Alternatively, the opposite edge of the laminated facestock can be calendered. The calendered edge appears to work better for feeding the sheets into horizontal feed printers. And instructions can be printed on the sheet (or on the packaging or on a packaging insert) instructing the user to orient the sheet so that the exposed liner strip defines the infeed end when a vertical feed printer is used and to orient the sheet so that the calendered edge defines the infeed end when a horizontal feed printer is used.
In fact, this inventive concept of the exposed liner strip at one end and the calendered edge at the other end can be used for other sheet constructions adapted for feeding into printers for a printing operation thereon. An example thereof is simply a face sheet adhered to a backing sheet. The backing sheet does not need to have cut lines or otherwise formed as strips. And the face sheet does not need to have cut lines; it can, for example, have perforated lines forming the perimeters of the business cards or other printable media.
A preferred sheet construction of the present invention is facially similar to but a significant improvement over the prior art “Paper Direct” product shown in
Similar to the dry laminate products of this invention described above a laminate cardstock is formed according to this preferred embodiment. Ultraremovable adhesive is applied to a paper sheet to form therewith a liner sheet and the liner sheet is laminated to a cardstock (facestock) sheet to form this laminate cardstock web. The web is face die cut through the cardstock sheet, but not through the liner sheet, to thereby form cardstock cut lines that define at least in part perimeters of the printable media (business cards, postcards, greeting cards, and so forth). At the next station the web is then die cut through the liner sheet, but not through the cardstock sheet, to form liner sheet strips on a back side of the cardstock sheet. Some of the strips define cover strips covering backs of some of the cardstock cut lines, and others of the strips define waste strips. The waste strips are then matrix removed from the back of the cardstock sheet. The web is then sheeted into sheets of the desired size, such as 8½ by 11 inches.
The sheets are ready to be fed into a printer or copier, and a printing operation thereby conducted on fronts of the printable media. The printed media are then separated from (peeled off of) the cover strips, ready for use. The cover strips preferably provide the sole means of keeping the die cut printable media together as an intact unit sheet for passing through the printer or copier. Removing the waste strips before the sheet is passed through the printer or copier makes the sheet more flexible so that it can bend and pass better through the winding paths in the printers or copiers.
The ultraremovable adhesive is peeled off with the paper waste strips and the cover strips thereby providing a clean back side to the cardstock sheet (and thereby the printed media). The clean back side(s) (even when a coating thereon is provided) advantageously can be written on, that is, it accepts pencil, ink and even inkjet and laser printing. The ultraremovable adhesive sticks to the paper allowing for easy removal and disposal of the paper strips, and even though it is tacky it does not stick to anything permanently. In contrast, the “Paper Direct” product uses a removable adhesive. (Generally, adhesions of “ultraremovable To assist the sheet in being fed into the printer or copier the lead-in edge thereof is preferably calendered, unlike the “Paper Direct” product. The web, before sheeting, is preferably calendered with textured calendering dies before the face cutting station. The calendering step is also preferably performed after the printing operation on the web wherein identifying and explanatory information is printed on the cardstock.” adhesives at their highest adhesion levels (to a surface such as stainless steel) are roughly half of what they are for conventional “removable” adhesive. A fundamental difference is that conventional adhesives provide complete contact with a substrate while ultraremovable adhesive provide partial contact. This limited contact area is what prevents an ultraremovable adhesive from becoming permanent, over time.)
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent to those persons having ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains from the foregoing description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
a is a front view of a preferred sheet construction of the present invention;
b is a back view of the sheet construction of
A number of different embodiments and manufacturing processes of the dry laminated business card sheet constructions of this invention are illustrated in the drawings and described in detail herein. A representative or first sheet construction is illustrated generally at 200 in
Referring to
A preferred example of this dry laminate facestock construction 224 is the “Dry Tag” product such as manufactured at the Fasson Roll Division of Avery Dennison Corporation. The facestock sheet 212 can alternatively be fluorescent paper, high gloss paper or thermal transfer label paper. A preferred high photo glossy paper which can be used is the glossy cardstock which is available from Rexam Graphics of Portland, Oreg. and has a thickness of approximately eight mil.
Preferred thicknesses of each of the layers of the laminate facestock construction 224 are as follows: the liner sheet 208—3.0 mil; the LDPE film layer 204—0.80 to 1.0 mil; the adhesive layer 216—0.60 to 0.75 mil; and the facestock sheet 212—8.3 or 8.5 to 9.0 mil. Alternatively, the liner sheet 208 plus the film layer 204 can have a 3.5 mil thickness. Another alternative is for the thicknesses of the facestock sheet 212 and the liner sheet 208 to be approximately 6.0 and 3.0 mil, respectively, or approximately 7.0 and 2.0 mil, respectively. The LDPE layer 204 will not significantly affect the flexibility of the sheet construction; rather, it is the thickness of the facestock 212 which is the more significant factor. To assist the picking up and feeding of the laminate facestock construction 224 into the printer or copier 230, the leading edge 234 can be, according to one definition of this invention, calendered or crushed, as shown in
In addition to calendering the leading edge 234 of the laminate facestock construction 224, further processing steps are needed to form the sheet construction 200. One key step is to form cut lines 240 on and through the laminate facestock. Referring to
The facestock cut lines 240 extend through the laminate facestock construction 224 and to but not through the liner sheet 208. If the facestock cut lines 240 passed through the liner sheet 208, the laminate facestock construction 224 would fall apart into the rectangular media 280 and the frame 260, each separate from the other. The separate small media cannot be passed effectively through the printer or copier 230 for a printing operation on them. Instead, the facestock cut lines 240 do not pass through the liner sheet 208. However, the continuous liner sheet 208, while it would hold the (ten) rectangular media 280 and the frame 260 together during the printing operation, may make the sheet construction 200 too rigid, lacking the flexibility to pass through the curving feed paths in printers or copiers. In some of the figures which show the back or liner face of the sheet construction, the facestock cut lines 240 are shown in dotted lines to depict their relationship with the liner sheet strips as discussed below. Although the facestock cut lines 240 and the liner-sheet cut lines discussed below are preferably formed by die cutting, other techniques such as laser cutting or using a circular cutting blade as would be known by those skilled in the art are within the scope of this invention.
Therefore, pursuant to the present invention, liner-sheet cut lines 300 are formed on the liner sheet 208, through the liner sheet and to but not through the laminate facestock 224. They divide the liner sheet 208 into liner strips 304. The liner-sheet cut lines 300 provide flexibility to the sheet construction 200 and according to some of the embodiments of this invention, adequate flexibility. However, for others the flexibility is not enough, so these embodiments provide that some of the strips are removed from the laminate facestock 224 to form the sheet construction which is passed through the printer or copier 230. More importantly, by removing some of the liner strips, the amount of memory curl induced in the (printed) media is reduced. The remaining strips 308, however, must be sufficient to hold the cut laminate facestock 224 together during the printing operation. In other words, the shape and location of the remaining strips 308 are selected on the one hand to provide sufficient sheet flexibility and to minimize memory curl and on the other hand to provide sufficient sheet integrity. In particular, according to preferred embodiments, the remaining strips cover all of the facestock cut lines 240 which are parallel to the infeed edge of the sheet. Where the sheet is to be fed in the portrait direction into the printer or copier 230, the covered facestock cut lines extend width-wise on the sheets.
The embodiment of
While sheet constructions 200, 350 show the liner-sheet cut lines and thus strips 308, 340 extending straight across the sheet, sheet construction 380 has its liner-sheet cut lines 384 extending diagonally across the back of the laminate facestock. This construction is shown in
The liner-sheet cut lines 300, 384 are discussed above and as shown in the corresponding drawing figures are all straight lines. However, it is also within the scope of the invention to make them curving or wavy, and a sheet construction embodiment having wavy or curving lines 412 is illustrated generally at 416 in
It is also within the scope of the present invention for the liner-sheet cut lines and thus the liner strips to not extend from one side or edge of the sheet to the other. A sheet construction embodying such a configuration is shown in
Flexibility of the sheet constructions at both ends thereof is important. Accordingly, referring to
A preferred embodiment of the liner sheet or the liner-sheet cut lines 300 and liner strips is illustrated by sheet construction shown generally at 482 in
Accordingly, the sheet construction 482 of
Each of the thin strips 494 and each of the central wide strips 490 extend a distance past the vertical frame cut lines, but not to the edge of the sheet. In other words, a liner edge or margin is left on both sides extending between the end wide strips 486. What this means is that the liner sheet “strips” which are removed after the liner-sheet cut lines are made and before the sheet construction is sent to the user for a printing operation are interconnected into a web or matrix. That is, all of the liner portions (or strips) between the thin strips 494 and the adjacent wide strips 486, 490 and between the adjacent thin strips are connected to the borders or margins and thereby to each other in a continuous web or matrix. Thus, by grabbing any portion of this matrix, and preferably a corner thereof, the entire matrix can be pulled off of the laminate facestock in essentially one step. As will be described with reference to
Both end edges are crushed or calendered as can be seen in
A schematic view of the system and process for manufacturing the laminate sheet construction 482 of
A schematic view of the system and process for manufacturing the laminate sheet construction 482 of
The web 554 is then pulled to the turning station shown generally at 580 where a turn bar 584 turns the web over so that the liner side is facing up and the facestock side is facing down for delivery to the calendering station. At the calendering station shown generally at 588 and including an anvil 592 and a calendering die 596, both edges of the web on the facestock side thereof are crushed for about 7/16 inch from a 13.4 mil thickness to approximately 10.4 mil.
The web 554 is pulled further to the two die cutting stations. The face cutting station shown generally at 600 includes an anvil 604 and a face cutting die 608, with the anvil positioned on top. At this station the face of the web 554 is cut up to the liner but without cutting the liner to create the business card shapes on the face with cut lines, as previously described. At the liner cutting station as shown generally at 620, the anvil 624 is positioned below the liner cut die 628, in a relative arrangement opposite to that at the face cutting station 600. The liner at this station 620 is die cut up to the face without cutting the face. At these die cutting stations 600, 620 a bridge bears down on the die bearers, which forces the die blades to cut into a predetermined portion of the caliper or thickness of the web. This portion is called a step, and is the difference between the bearer and the end of the die cutting blades. The smaller the step, the deeper the cut into the web, as would be understood by those skilled in the die cutting art.
The liner cutting forms the waste matrix 640 of the liner sheet. This matrix 640 is grabbed and pulled off of the web 554 and wound onto a roll 644 at the waste matrix station, which is shown generally at 648. The finished web 652 is thereby formed and delivered to the sheeting station. The calendering station 588, the face cutting station 600, the liner cutting station 620 and the waste matrix station 648 can essentially be arranged in any order except that the waste matrix station must follow the liner cutting station.
The sheeting station which is shown generally at 660 includes an anvil 664 and a sheeter cylinder 668. The eleven-inch wide web 652 is sheeted into eight-and-a-half inch sheets 672. Of course, if different sizes of sheets 672 (or 482) are desired (such as 8½ by 14 inch or A4 size) then the width of the web and/or the sheeting distance can be altered or selected as needed. The final sheet constructions 672 (or 482) are shown stacked in a stack 680 at the stacking station, which is illustrated generally at 684. Each stack 680 of sheets can then be packaged and distributed to the end user through normal retail distribution channels.
The end user then unpackages the sheets and stacks them in a stack 686 in the infeed tray 694 of a printer (particularly an ink jet printer) or copier 230, such as shown in
The individual printed media or business cards 700 are then peeled off of the rest of the sheet construction in an operation as shown in
A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown generally at 710 in
Two alternative systems or method for stripping the laminate facestock strip are illustrated in
The other method or system does not use the separate stripping station 728. Instead the stripping is conducted in the facility 550. The die cut line 724 is made at the face cutting station 600. The facestock strip is then removed at the removal station shown generally at 740, which can be part of waste matrix station 648. At removal station 740, the face strip 744 is wrapped around a driven roll 748 and exhausted using an air line 752 into a vacuum system.
The arrangement of having one end of a sheet construction formed by stripping a strip (744) of a face sheet (such as laminate facestock) off of a backing sheet (such as a liner sheet) can be used not only on sheet construction 710 and the other previously-described sheet constructions but also on generally any multi-sheet construction.
An example thereof is the sheet construction shown generally at 780 in
A preferred laminate sheet construction of the present invention is illustrated in
What all of the sheet constructions of
The cardstock sheet 836 may have or include a face coat 852 (
Examples of usable cardstocks 836 are: (1) ink jet (uncoated) (a) Monadnock Paper Mills: 65# Cover (white, mellow white and antique gray) and (b) Monadnock Paper Mills: 100# Text (white, mellow white and antique gray); (2) ink jet (coated) (a) Monadnock Paper Mills: Lightweight C1S (white, mellow white and antique gray), (b) Monadnock Paper Mills: Heavyweight C1S (white, mellow white and antique gray), and (c) Mitsubishi Paper Mills: C1S Glossy (white); (3) laser (uncoated) (a) Fox River Paper Co.: 100# Text (white, natural and cool gray), and (b) Boise Cascade: 100# Offset (white); and (4) laser (coated) (a) Monadnock Paper Mills: C1S w/“Nairobi” or “Harmony” coating (white), and (b) Nakagawa: C1S Magnetic substrate.
Referring to
To assist the sheet construction in being consistently and accurately picked up and fed into the printer or copier, the infeed edge (and the opposite end) of the sheet construction can be calendered or crushed, as shown in various of the drawing figures at 864. More particularly, the thickness of the infeed end of the sheet (or the laminate web 870 during the manufacturing process—see
The process(es) for making the sheet constructions of
The printed web 870 then passes to the web turning assembly 896, which flips the web over so that the liner side 870a of the web is up and the face side 870b is down. The calendering station 900 is next, and it includes an anvil roll 904 and a calendering die 908 which calenders the “infeed” edge of the web. The calendering dies 908 preferably have a random-patterned textured finish. As opposed to a smooth tool, the textured dies 908 grip the web 870 and keep it flat and even during the calendering process. The textured calendered end (864) also assists the printer's rollers to grip the sheet construction for infeeding same.
The web 870 then passes to the face cutting station 916, which includes an anvil roll 920 and a face cutting die 924, and the through-cut lines 840 in the facestock sheet 836 (but not passing into the liner 844) are formed at this station to define perimeters of the printable media (e.g., business cards, greeting cards, post cards, etc.). The liner cutting station 930, which includes the liner cutting die 934 and anvil roller 936, is the next station in this manufacturing process. At this station 930 the continuous liner sheet portion of the web 870 is die cut to form alternating cover strips 844 and waste strips 938 on the back of the cardstock sheet 836. The cover strips 844 cover the horizontal cardstock sheet die-cut lines, that is, the through-cut lines 840, which are width-wise parallel to the infeed edge of the cardstock sheet 836. The waste strips 938 are between the cover strips 844. The (separate) paper waste strips 938 are removed (pulled off) at the removal station 942, which can include a matrix rewind mandrel 946. Alternatively, the waste strips 938 can be removed from the web by a blower system.
The web 870 then passes to the sheeter station 950 where the web is cut or sheeted to the desired (width) dimension, such as 8.5 by eleven inch sheets as shown by a stack of same at 954. The sheets can then be packaged in sets, boxed and distributed to the end user through normal commercial channels as would be known. The sheets are then unpackaged and fed by a user through a printer or copier (see
Although a single-web process is illustrated in
Preferred dimensions and configurations for each of the versions of the business card, greeting card and post card embodiments as depicted in
For the three embodiments, the biggest difference in the cardstock 836 used is the thickness. Business cards are typically thicker and somewhat stiffer than greeting cards and post cards. For example, an average of 8.2-9.0 mils as opposed to an average of 7.4-7.6 mils. The greeting card embodiment would likely have a scored fold line 960 formed at the facestock die cutting station and incorporated in the same die. The post cards are preferably standard four by six inch size; and the additional cut lines 964 at the top and bottom are provide additional flexibility for feeding and passing the sheet construction through the printer or copier. They can also be provided for the greeting cards. Optional short side perforated lines 968 can also be provided to increase flexibility of the sheet construction.
Preferred dimensions in inches (in parentheses) for construction 800, referring to
Instead of providing the full paper liner laminated to the cardstock, die cutting it and removing the waste strips, an alternative manufacturing method of this invention will now be described. A cardstock web (which does not have a paper liner laminated thereto) is unwound from a roll and indicia printed thereon. Cross-direction lines are die cut therethrough, and then individual paper strips are laminated (with ultraremovable adhesive) to the cardstock web at the desired locations. The next step is to machine-direction die cut the web. Calendering of the edge of the web can be done right before the printing step or immediately before the machine-direction die cutting step. After the machine-direction die cutting step, the web is sheeted, and the sheets are stacked, packaged, boxed and distributed.
Referring to
The preferred dimensions of the preferred sheet construction are indicated in the drawings as follows in inches: 1000a (⅜), 1000b (¾), 1000c (½), 1000d ( 1/16), 1000e (3½), 1000f (2), 1000g (8½), 1000h (11), and 1000i (¼), and machine direction 1000j. As can be seen in
Examples of preferred dimensions and materials will now be described. The laminate can be eight point C1S (coated on one side)/LP430 weld/dry base. The total laminate caliper will be a minimum of 12.7 mils., a maximum of 14.1 and a target of 13.4. The facestock or cardstock can be MONADNOCK 8 point C1S. The caliper will be a minimum of 8.1 mils., a maximum of 8.7 and a target of 8.4. The smoothness will have minimum, maximum and target values of 110, 200 and 160 SFU. The brightness will be 98.5% minimum. The coefficient of friction will be 0.76 (static) and 0.55 (kinetic). The liner will have a minimum caliper of 3.8 mils, maximum of 4.6 and a target of 4.2. The brightness will have minimum, maximum and target percentage values of 96.8, 97.8 and 97.3, respectively. The smoothness will preferably be 200 SFU. And the release will have minimum, maximum and target values of 50, 150 and 100 grams per square meter. The adhesive will preferably be an emulsion acrylic. It will have a coat weight of weld (target) and a service temperature of −40 to 200 degrees Fahrenheit.
As can be seen in
The sheet construction of
The sheet construction of
From the foregoing detailed description, it will be evident that there are a number of changes, adaptations and modifications of the present invention which come within the province of those skilled in the art. For example, the printed media instead of being business cards can be postcards, mini-folded cards, tent cards or photo frames. However, it is intended that all such variations not departing from the spirit of the invention be considered as within the scope thereof.
This application claims the filing date benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 60/208,767, filed Jun. 2, 2000, and is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/400,170, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,955, filed Sep. 21, 1999, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/158,728 filed Sep. 22, 1998 and Ser. No. 09/158,308 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,374,631, filed Sep. 22, 1998; the entire contents of all four of these applications and of International Publication WO 00/16978, published Mar. 30, 2000, are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1865741 | Carney | Jul 1932 | A |
2321184 | Butterworth | Jun 1943 | A |
2434545 | Brady, Jr. et al. | Jan 1948 | A |
2681732 | Brady | Jun 1954 | A |
2883044 | Kendrick | Apr 1959 | A |
3140215 | Russell | Jul 1964 | A |
3239478 | Harlan, Jr. | Mar 1966 | A |
3361252 | Wise | Jan 1968 | A |
3380871 | Thomas | Apr 1968 | A |
3420364 | Kennedy, Jr. | Jan 1969 | A |
3568829 | Brady, Jr. | Mar 1971 | A |
3769147 | Komendat et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3854229 | Morgan | Dec 1974 | A |
4004058 | Buros et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4020204 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4048736 | Castleman et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4051285 | Kramer | Sep 1977 | A |
4128954 | White | Dec 1978 | A |
4150183 | Reed | Apr 1979 | A |
4243458 | Giulie | Jan 1981 | A |
4368903 | Jones | Jan 1983 | A |
4380564 | Cancio et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4398287 | Spencer | Aug 1983 | A |
4398985 | Eagon | Aug 1983 | A |
4405401 | Stahl | Sep 1983 | A |
4447481 | Holmberg et al. | May 1984 | A |
4465729 | Cancio | Aug 1984 | A |
4528054 | Stahl | Jul 1985 | A |
4545517 | Olson | Oct 1985 | A |
4548845 | Parsons et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4549063 | Ang et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4560600 | Yellin et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4704317 | Hickenbotham et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4732069 | Wood et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4833122 | Doll et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837088 | Freedman | Jun 1989 | A |
4858957 | Capozzola | Aug 1989 | A |
4863772 | Cross | Sep 1989 | A |
4873643 | Powell et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878643 | Stinson | Nov 1989 | A |
4879148 | Neaves et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4882211 | McIntyre et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4890862 | Buchholz | Jan 1990 | A |
4940258 | Cuba, Jr. et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5007191 | Klein | Apr 1991 | A |
5039652 | Doll et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5090733 | Bussiere | Feb 1992 | A |
5100728 | Plamthottam et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5132915 | Goodman | Jul 1992 | A |
5135789 | Schmidt | Aug 1992 | A |
5139836 | Burke | Aug 1992 | A |
5154962 | Mertens et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5198275 | Klein | Mar 1993 | A |
5209810 | Marschke | May 1993 | A |
5219183 | McKillip | Jun 1993 | A |
5238269 | Levine | Aug 1993 | A |
5262216 | Popat et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5288714 | Marschke | Feb 1994 | A |
5340427 | Cusack et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5389414 | Papal | Feb 1995 | A |
5403236 | Greig | Apr 1995 | A |
5407718 | Popat et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413532 | Raby | May 1995 | A |
5416134 | Skoglund | May 1995 | A |
5418026 | Dronzek, Jr. et al. | May 1995 | A |
5462488 | McKillip | Oct 1995 | A |
5462783 | Esselmann | Oct 1995 | A |
5466013 | Garrison | Nov 1995 | A |
5495981 | Warther | Mar 1996 | A |
5509693 | Kohls | Apr 1996 | A |
5518787 | Konkol | May 1996 | A |
5530793 | Watkins et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534320 | Raby | Jul 1996 | A |
5543191 | Dronzek, Jr. et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558454 | Owen | Sep 1996 | A |
5571587 | Bishop et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589025 | Garrison | Dec 1996 | A |
5595403 | Garrison | Jan 1997 | A |
5599128 | Steiner | Feb 1997 | A |
5622758 | Hollis et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625996 | Bechtel | May 1997 | A |
5632511 | Longtin | May 1997 | A |
5632842 | Oliver et al. | May 1997 | A |
5656705 | Mallya et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5670226 | Yoshizawa et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5702789 | Fernandez-Kirchberger et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5730826 | Sieber | Mar 1998 | A |
5735453 | Gick et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766398 | Cahill et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769457 | Warther | Jun 1998 | A |
5782497 | Casagrande | Jul 1998 | A |
5793174 | Kovach et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5825996 | Davis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5842722 | Carlson | Dec 1998 | A |
5853837 | Popat | Dec 1998 | A |
5885678 | Malhotra | Mar 1999 | A |
5890743 | Garrison et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5908209 | Carides et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5947525 | Pollman | Sep 1999 | A |
5948494 | Levin | Sep 1999 | A |
5976294 | Fagnant et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985075 | Freedman | Nov 1999 | A |
5993928 | Popat | Nov 1999 | A |
5997680 | Popat | Dec 1999 | A |
5997683 | Popat | Dec 1999 | A |
6001209 | Popat et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6033751 | Kline | Mar 2000 | A |
6039356 | Warther et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6074747 | Scholz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099927 | Freedman | Aug 2000 | A |
6103326 | Kobayashi | Aug 2000 | A |
6110552 | Casey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6126773 | Fernandez-Kirchberger et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135504 | Teng | Oct 2000 | A |
6135507 | Hamby | Oct 2000 | A |
6136130 | Tataryan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6173649 | Onishi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6217078 | Roth et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221192 | Walsh | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256109 | Rosenbaum et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268032 | Mertens et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277456 | Bulgrin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6328340 | Fischer | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331018 | Roth et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340512 | Mercer et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352287 | Casagrande | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6352608 | Garden | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358587 | Saint et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379760 | Tang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6482490 | Hanahara et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6730826 | Wagner | May 2004 | B2 |
6827373 | Zumberge | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837955 | McCarthy et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6890397 | Weirather et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7144469 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7288163 | Weirather et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7374631 | Weirather et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7377996 | Bilodeau | May 2008 | B2 |
7579076 | Ishikawa | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20010007703 | Weirather et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020047263 | McCarthy et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020096874 | Viby | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20050087977 | Crum | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095387 | McCarthy et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050175807 | Bilodeau | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060028015 | Ray | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070141292 | Utz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070275204 | Ugolick | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
B-5006090 | Aug 1990 | AU |
A-8832591 | Jun 1992 | AU |
2088958 | Feb 1993 | CA |
2148553 | Dec 1995 | CA |
2257435 | Dec 1984 | DE |
G 88 07 521 | Sep 1988 | DE |
G 88 07 521.4 | Dec 1988 | DE |
19519584 | Dec 1996 | DE |
19741563 | Mar 1998 | DE |
29805481 | Sep 1998 | DE |
9219168 | Dec 1998 | DE |
29907361 | Mar 2000 | DE |
19945254 | Aug 2001 | DE |
69909841 | May 2004 | DE |
0126312 | Nov 1984 | EP |
0 299 598 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0334584 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0 341 328 | Nov 1989 | EP |
0 416 862 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0 514 625 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 613 792 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0 658 423 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 690 794 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 987 670 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0 987 670 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0987195 | Mar 2000 | EP |
765 514 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1274619 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1586336 | Jan 1970 | FR |
05-318672 | Dec 1993 | JP |
11-170745 | Jun 1999 | JP |
156959 | Feb 1988 | NO |
WO 9534879 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9717664 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9740979 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9812383 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9931644 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0016978 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0032412 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0046316 | Aug 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fasson Roll Division (circa 1986) 14 pages. |
Fasson Dry Technology Products (circa 1986) 13 pages. |
Avery Dennison Corporation, “1997-98 Full Line Specification Catalog (Appendix II),” Avery Office Products. |
Avery Dennison, “White Photo Frame Cards for Ink Jet Printers,” packaging/ inserts from Avery's Product 3258, Avery Personal Creations (© 1997, produced Oct. 1998) (Appx. III). |
Avery Dennison Corporation, “1995 Full Line Illustrated Product Catalog,” (cover sheet and p. 33 Laser Business Cards, Laser Tent Cards and Laser Note Cards) (Appendix VI). |
Examination Report in European Patent Application EP 99948369, dated Nov. 16, 2006. |
Examination Report in European Patent Application EP 99948369, dated Sep. 16, 2005. |
Examination Report in European Patent Application EP 99948369, dated Jan. 14, 2005. |
Examination Report in European Patent Application EP 99948369, dated Mar. 9, 2004. |
Fasson® S246 Data Sheet; http://www.na.fasson.com/frna/Prod—sht.nsf/AllKeys/S246?OpenDocument. |
Response dated Aug. 26, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Office action dated Oct. 3, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Amendment dated Jan. 9, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Supplemental amendment dated Jan. 23, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Final office action Feb. 26, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Amendment dated Mar. 17, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Notice of allowance dated Mar. 25, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
RCE dated Jun. 25, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Notice of allowance dated Aug. 27, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
RCE/amendment dated Nov. 21, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Notice of non-compliant amendment dated Sep. 10, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Amendment dated Sep. 17, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Notice of allowance dated Oct. 6, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Patent grant dated Oct. 9, 2009 from related Argentinean Application No. PO10102662. |
Notice of acceptance dated Apr. 23, 2008 from related Australian Application No. 2006202835. |
Office action dated Nov. 29, 2007 from related Canadian Application No. 2410996. |
Notice of allowance dated Jan. 20, 2009 from related Canadian Application No. 2410996. |
Reinstatement and amendment dated Jul. 21, 2009 from related Canadian Application No. 2410996. |
Office action dated Sep. 3, 2009 from related Canadian Application No. 2410996. |
Amendment dated Feb. 23, 2010 from related Canadian Application No. 2410996. |
Notice of allowance dated Jun. 15, 2010 from related Canadian Application No. 2410996. |
Examination report dated Mar. 2, 2006 from related European Application No. 01941861.5. |
Amendment dated Sep. 12, 2006 from related European Application No. 01941861.5. |
Examination report dated May 21, 2007 from related European Application No. 01941861.5. |
Response dated Sep. 26, 2007 from related European Application No. 01941861.5. |
Examination report dated Mar. 14, 2008 from related European Application No. 01941861.5. |
Amendment dated Jul. 9, 2008 from related European Application No. 01941861.5. |
Intent to grant dated Mar. 19, 2009 from related European Application No. 01941861.5. |
Decision to grant dated Aug. 20, 2009 from related European Application No. 01941861.5. |
Amendment dated Oct. 26, 2010 from related European Divisional Application No. 09008743.8. |
Office action dated Aug. 31, 2010 from related European Divisional Application No. 09008743.8. |
Search report dated Dec. 28, 2010 from related European Divisional Application No. 09008743.8. |
Examination report dated Feb. 17, 2003 from New Zealand application No. 523129. |
International preliminary examination report dated Dec. 2, 2002 from related International Application No. PCT/US2001/17972. |
International search report dated Dec. 13, 2001 from related International Application No. PCT/US2001/17972. |
Preliminary amendment dated Nov. 16, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Supplemental preliminary amendment dated Sep. 7, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Supplemental preliminary amendment dated Sep. 14, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Office action dated Jan. 9, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Amendment dated Mar. 25, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Office action dated Oct. 8, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Amendment dated Oct. 28, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Office action dated Feb. 5, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Amendment dated Aug. 5, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Restriction requirement dated Dec. 1, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Amendment dated Dec. 17, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Notice of non-compliant amendment dated Apr. 16, 2010 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Amendment dated May 13, 2010 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Office action dated Aug. 9, 2010 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Amendment dated Dec. 8, 2010 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Final office action dated Feb. 17, 2011 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Notice of abandonment dated Dec. 30, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/925,666. |
Preliminary amendment dated Oct. 26, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/925,666. |
Restriction requirement dated Jun. 16, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/925,666. |
International search report dated Jan. 19, 2000 from related International Application No. PCT/US1999/21854. |
Amendment dated Jul. 26, 2011 from related European Application No. 08152543.8. |
Decision to grant dated Oct. 7, 2011 from related European Application No. 08152543.8. |
Office action dated Oct. 24, 2008 from related Mexican Application No. PA/a/2001/002989. |
Interview summary dated Dec. 18, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Interview summary dated May 9, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Interview summary dated Oct. 10, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Interview summary dated May 17, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Dec. 1, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Office action dated Jan. 23, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Interview summary dated Apr. 25, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Office action dated Jul. 20, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Apr. 10, 2008 from related Australian Application No. 2006202835. |
Amendment dated Jul. 19, 2011 from related European Application No. 09008743.8. |
International preliminary examination report dated Dec. 20, 2000 from related International Application No. PCT/US1999/21854. |
Amendment dated Aug. 22, 2011 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728.—Aug. 22, 2011 Amendment. |
Amendment dated Aug. 16, 2011 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Amendment dated Apr. 23, 2001 from related European application No. 99948369.6. |
Intent to grant dated Jul. 27, 2007 from related European application No. 99948369.6. |
Office action dated Jun. 3, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Oct. 17, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Notice of allowance dated Jan. 13, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
RCE dated Mar. 14, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Notice of allowance dated Apr. 22, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
RCE and amendment dated Jul. 22, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Notice of allowance dated Oct. 1, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
RCE and amendment dated Dec. 19, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Office action dated Mar. 23, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Jun. 8, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Notice of allowance dated Sep. 16, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
RCE dated Sep. 30, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Notice of allowance dated Feb. 17, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
RCE dated May 11, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Office action dated Aug. 9, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Oct. 31, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Office action dated Mar. 2, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Jun. 5, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Oct. 25, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Notice of allowance and interview summary dated Mar. 27, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
RCE dated Apr. 13, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Jul. 30, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Aug. 2, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Interview summary dated Sep. 14, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Sep. 19, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Notice of allowance dated Jan. 8, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Preliminary amendment dated Feb. 13, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Preliminary amendment dated Apr. 7, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Election/restriction requirement dated Oct. 1, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Amendment dated Oct. 29, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Office action dated Jan. 11, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Amendment dated Mar. 1, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Amendment dated Apr. 1, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Interview summary dated Jun. 28, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Office action dated Jun. 28, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Amendment dated Jul. 6, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Office action dated Sep. 21, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Amendment dated Nov. 7, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Office action dated Feb. 10, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Amendment dated Apr. 29, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Office action dated Jul. 18, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Interview summary dated Sep. 21, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Amendment dated Oct. 23, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Notice of allowance dated Jan. 18, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Amendment dated Apr. 13, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Amendment dated Aug. 2, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Interview summary dated Sep. 4, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Notice of allowance dated Sep. 4, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,005. |
Preliminary amendment dated May 5, 2000 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Restriction requirement dated Jun. 3, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/565,972. |
Office action dated Jan. 12, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Jun. 12, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Aug. 23, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Sep. 12, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Oct. 23, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Jan. 10, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Jan. 17, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Apr. 5, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Jul. 11, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Oct. 9, 2007 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Feb. 11, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated May 1, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Nov. 3, 2008 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Election/restriction requirement dated Feb. 5, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Feb. 24, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Jun. 22, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Notice of appeal and pre-brief appeal conference request dated Dec. 14, 2009 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Pre-brief appeal conference decision dated Jan. 12, 2010 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Apr. 15, 2010 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Oct. 11, 2010 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Dec. 28, 2010 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Mar. 30, 2011 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Apr. 21, 2011 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Election/restriction requirement dated Jun. 29, 2001 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Amendment dated Oct. 26, 2001 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Election/restriction requirement dated Mar. 22, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Amendment dated Apr. 22, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Office action dated Jun. 4, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Amendment dated Oct. 11, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Office action dated Jan. 13, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Amendment dated Feb. 26, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Office action dated May 21, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Amendment dated Jul. 25, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Office action dated Oct. 1, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Amendment dated Feb. 2, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Notice of allowance dated May 17, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Amendment dated Aug. 11, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Notice of allowance dated Oct. 7, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/400,170. |
Preliminary amendment dated Dec. 7, 1998 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Preliminary amendment dated Dec. 21, 1999 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Election/restriction requirement dated Mar. 22, 2000 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Apr. 25, 2000 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Office action dated Jun. 5, 2000 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Aug. 21, 2000 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Office action and Interview summary dated Nov. 7, 2000 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated May 8, 2001 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Office action dated Jul. 3, 2001 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Jan. 3, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Office action dated Mar. 14, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Amendment dated Apr. 23, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,308. |
Patent grant dated Feb. 22, 2007 from related Australian Application No. 2003235017. |
Amendment dated May 26, 2009 from related Australian Application No. 2007200561. |
Patent grant dated Oct. 15, 2009 from related Australian Application No. 2007200561. |
Examiner's report dated Feb. 21, 2007 from related Australian Application No. 2007200561. |
Amendment dated Apr. 18, 2008 from related Canadian Application No. 2,345,101. |
Patent grant dated Sep. 16, 2009 from related Canadian Application No. 2,345,101. |
Notice of allowance dated Oct. 7, 2008 from related Canadian Application No. 2,345,101. |
Amendment dated Feb. 7, 2003 from related European Application No. 99948369.6. |
Search report dated Aug. 9, 2002 from related European Application No. 99948369.6. |
Amendment dated Sep. 14, 2004 from related European Application No. 99948369.6. |
Amendment dated Mar. 26, 2008 from related Canadian Application No. 2,345,101. |
Amendment dated Jul. 22, 2005 from related European Application No. 99948369.6. |
Interview summary dated May 23, 2011 from related European Application No. 08152543.8. |
Amendment dated Jul. 18, 2006 from related European Application No. 99948369.6. |
Amendment dated Mar. 21, 2007 from related European Application No. 99948369.6. |
Decision to grant dated Feb. 14, 2008 from related European Application No. 99948369.6. |
Amendment dated Sep. 30, 10 from related European Divisional Application No. 08152543.8. |
Search report dated May 4, 2009 from related European Divisional Application No. 08152543.8. |
Intent to grant dated Apr. 12, 2011 from related European Application No. 08152543.8. |
Office action dated Jan. 20, 2010 from related European Application No. 08152543.8. |
Withdrawal of office action dated Jul. 13, 2010 Office action dated Jan. 20, 2010 from related European Application No. 08152543.8. |
Patent grant dated Jun. 23, 2009 from related Mexican Application No. PA/a/2001/002989. |
Office action dated Apr. 10, 2007 from related Mexican Application No. PA/a/2001/002989. |
Preliminary amendment dated Dec. 7 1998 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Preliminary amendment dated Dec. 21, 99 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Jul. 4, 2000 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
CPA dated Jan. 5, 2001 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Oct. 9, 2001 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Feb. 5, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Restriction requirement dated Apr. 1, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Jun. 27, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Restriction requirement dated Sep. 25, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Oct. 16, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Restriction requirement dated Nov. 15, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Dec. 12, 2002 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Jan. 2, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Jan. 28, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Apr. 8, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated May 12, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Jul. 28, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Oct. 22, 2003 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Jan. 15, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Jul. 15, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Final office action dated Sep. 24, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Jan. 24, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Office action dated Apr. 18, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Amendment dated Sep. 22, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Supplemental amendment dated Oct. 31, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728. |
Examiner's First Report dated Feb. 24, 2005 in Australian Application No. 20023235017, 2 pgs. |
Response to Office Action dated May 29, 2008 in Canadian Application No. 2,410,996, 14 pgs. |
Amendment dated Jun. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320, 16 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320, 13 pgs. |
Amendment dated Sep. 27, 2012, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320, 14 pgs. |
Interview Summary and Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320, 11 pgs. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728, dated May 21, 2013. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728, dated Aug. 28, 2012. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728, dated Nov. 28, 2012. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728, dated Dec. 21, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance in Canada Application No. 2694879, dated Apr. 20, 2012. |
Response and Amended Claims in European Application No. 09008743.8, dated Dec. 15, 2011. |
Office Action in European Application No. 09008743.8, dated Apr. 25, 2013. |
Request for Continued Examination in U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320, dated Jan. 25, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320, dated Mar. 21, 2013. |
Request for Continued Examination in U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320, dated Jun. 12, 2013. |
Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2011 from related European Application No. 09008743.8. |
Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2011 from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,320. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 26, 2011 from related Canadian Application No. 2694879. |
Request for Reinstatement and Amendment dated Feb. 28, 2012 from related Canadian Application No. 2694879. |
Preliminary amendment dated Dec. 29, 2004 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Election/restriction requirement dated Aug. 3, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Amendment dated Aug. 11, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Office action dated Nov. 7, 2005 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Amendment dated May 5, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Office action dated May 11, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Amendment dated May 19, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Office action dated Aug. 9, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Amendment dated Sep. 15, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Interview summary dated Sep. 18, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Interview summary dated Sep. 28, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Notice of allowance dated Oct. 6, 2006 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/024,665. |
Fasson® S246 Data Sheet; http://www.na.fasson.com/frna/Prod—sht.nsf/AllKeys/S246?OpenDocument, Dated Mar. 3, 2012. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/158,728, dated Jun. 13, 2013, 27 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020047263 A1 | Apr 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60208767 | Jun 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09400170 | Sep 1999 | US |
Child | 09872353 | US | |
Parent | 09158728 | Sep 1998 | US |
Child | 09400170 | US | |
Parent | 09158308 | Sep 1998 | US |
Child | 09158728 | US |