This disclosure is related to the feeding of media sheets in a printer or copier and more particularly to detecting and preventing multifeeds of sheets.
Multifeeds of media sheets in a printer or copier can be typically caused by welding of sheet edges, porosity of sheets, adhesion and static charge between sheets, as well as separate sheets being fed from multiple feed trays. A vacuum sheet feeding system can reduce some but not all multifeeds of sheets. When multifeeds do occur, the multiple sheets can jam the printer or copier forcing an operator to fix the jam, intervene with the print job, and possibly even damaging the printer or copier.
Quite often the multifeed will manifest itself as a “shingle” multifeed. In this case, the multifed sheets are not exactly overlapped and will have an offset. Due to the overlap, it is possible to separate the sheets by holding the trailing sheet in the previous set of nips and allowing the leading sheet to be taken away.
The present disclosure provides for an apparatus and method to detect and separate shingle sheets and thereby reduce multifeed/jam rates.
In one arrangement, a sheet separating mechanism is provided to prevent the multifeeding of sheets into printers or copiers. The sheet separating mechanism provides a first nip and a second nip for feeding a series of sheets therebetween. The first nip can include a first motor and the second nip can include a second motor for feeding a leading sheet from the first nip to the second nip. The mechanism further provides a first sensor for sensing a trailing edge of the leading sheet and a second sensor for sensing a leading edge of the leading sheet. The first sensor is upstream of the first motor and the second sensor is downstream of the second motor. A trailing sheet can be prevented from feeding with the leading sheet by stopping the first motor when the leading edge of the leading sheet is sensed by the second sensor and when the first sensor remains occluded.
In another arrangement, a xerographic system is provided to prevent multifeeding of sheets. The system provides a sheet feeding apparatus having a first nip and a first sensor upstream from a second nip and a second sensor. The system further provides that the first nip includes a feed motion adapted to feed a pair of sheets in a feed direction from the first nip toward the second nip during the feed motion. The second nip includes a feed motion adapted to feed a leading sheet from the pair of sheets in the feed direction. The first nip is adapted to halt the feed motion responsive to the first and second sensors wherein a trailing sheet is stopped at a wait point positioned between the first nip and the second nip until the leading sheet clears the second sensor.
The disclosure further provides a method of feeding sheets to a printer or a copier comprising applying a feed force in a feed direction to a leading sheet. The feeding of the leading sheet can be from a first nip to a second nip wherein the first nip includes a first motor and the second nip includes a second motor. The first sensor can sense a trailing edge of the leading sheet and the second sensor can sense a leading edge of the leading sheet wherein the first sensor is upstream of the first motor and the second sensor is downstream of the second motor. The method prevents a trailing sheet from feeding with the leading sheet by stopping the first motor when the leading edge of the leading sheet is sensed by the second sensor while simultaneously the first sensor remains occluded.
An apparatus and method for detecting and separating shingled sheets is shown in
Shingled sheets 22, 24 can be fed via the first motor 34 to a wait point or position 50 with the leading sheet 22 slightly ahead of, in front of, or offset from a trailing sheet 24. The offset shingled sheets 22, 24 can move together from the first nip 32 towards the second nip 42. The leading sheet 22 will reach the second nip 42 first. A leading edge 52 of the leading sheet 22 arrives at the second sensor 46 (refer to
If the second sensor 46 goes clear at the expected time, then the trailing sheet 24 is determined to be a shingled sheet occluding the first sensor 36. The trailing sheet 24 can then be fed through the system 30 as the next top sheet thereby eliminating a jam situation and likely shutdown/intervention to the system 30.
In one exemplary arrangement, a xerographic system can comprise the sheet feeding apparatus having the first nip 32 and its associated first sensor 36 upstream from the second nip 42 and its associated second sensor 46. The first nip 32 can have a feed motion adapted to feed a pair of sheets 22, 24 in a feed direction from the first nip 32 toward the second nip 42 during the feed motion. The second nip 42 can have a feed motion adapted to feed the leading sheet 22 from the pair of sheets in the feed direction. The first nip 32 can be adapted to halt the feed motion in response to the first and second sensors 36, 46 wherein the trailing sheet 24 is stopped at the wait point 50, which can be positioned between the first nip 32 and the second nip 42, until the leading sheet 22 clears the second sensor 46.
The pair of sheets 22, 24 can each be of a predetermined length. The system 30 can further include a timer for timing the duration of time between entry of the leading edge 52 and exit of a trailing edge 54 of the leading sheet 22 with the second sensor 46. The duration of time can be compared with a predetermined time based upon the predetermined sheet length. The trailing sheet 24 can become a next leading sheet and the first motor 34 can feed the trailing sheet 24 from the first nip 32 to the second nip 42 when the duration is substantially equal to the predetermined time.
The first nip 32 and the second nip 42 can have a fixed spacing therebetween. The leading edge 62 of the trailing sheet is stopped at the wait point 50 when the first motor 34 is stopped. It is to be appreciated that the leading edge 52 of the leading sheet 22 is offset and downstream from the leading edge 62 of the trailing sheet 24.
One exemplary method adapted for feeding sheets to a printer or a copier can be described as follows. Apply a feed force in a feed direction to the leading sheet 22. Feed the leading sheet 22 from the first nip 32 to the second nip 42 wherein the first nip 32 includes the first motor 34 and the second nip 42 includes the second motor 44. Sense the trailing edge 54 of the leading sheet 22 with the first sensor 36 and sense the leading edge 52 of the leading sheet 22 with the second sensor 46 wherein the first sensor 36 is upstream of the first motor 34 and the second sensor 46 is downstream of the second motor 44. The system 30 can prevent the trailing sheet 24 from feeding with the leading sheet 22 by stopping the first motor 34 when the leading edge 52 of the leading sheet 22 is sensed by the second sensor 46 while simultaneously the first sensor 36 remains occluded. Referring to
If the sheets have a predetermined length and the nips have a fixed distance therebetween, then a predetermined duration is known for feeding a sheet from the first nip 32 to the second nip 42. Thus a comparison can be conducted wherein the actual duration between sensing the leading edge 52 and the trailing edge 54 of the leading sheet 22 is measured and compared with the predetermined duration. If the actual duration is substantially equal to the predetermined duration, then the trailing sheet becomes the next leading sheet. The system can then feed the next leading sheet from the first nip 32 to the second nip 42.
It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6554275 | Tranquilla | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6644660 | Sussmeier et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6836640 | Isemura et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7068969 | Ueda | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7150455 | Furukawa et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7293769 | Asari et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308853 | Satoh et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7396175 | Ueda | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7448622 | Kim | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20050017442 | Furukawa et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070045936 | Kuo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090051105 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |