SHELL CASE DESIGN UTILIZING METAL INJECTION MOLDING

Abstract

Disclosed is a cartridge case for various caliber ammunition that consists essentially of a powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy that is formed into the cartridge case through an injection mold processing. Also disclosed is a method for forming a cartridge case, which may include use of Metal Injection Molding (“MIM”) processes to produce the cartridge case which retains a primer, propellant, and/or a bullet. The method can include metal injection molding an initial part, and also at least one of tapering and trimming the initial part to form the finished cartridge case. Further embodiments can include the use of Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis to develop an optimized MIM design.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments herein relate to a cartridge case that consists essentially of or consists entirely of a powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy that has been formed into the cartridge case through an injection mold processing. Also disclosed is a method for forming a cartridge case, which may include use of Metal Injection Molding (MIM) and, in particular, MIM technology that includes a propellant and a primer and is easily scalable for various caliber cartridge cases.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Small caliber ammunition production can be a complex process. The complexity can lead to high costs and inflexibility in the design and production of cartridge cases for the ammunition, and large variability and inconsistency that results in high scrap rates and non-conforming parts. It may be beneficial to have process by which the production of a cartridge case is simplified and/or streamlined, and can hold very tight tolerances while still being cost effective. It may also be beneficial to produce a cartridge case that consists essentially of or consists of a powdered metal or a powdered metal alloy that has been formed via Metal Injection Molding (“MIM”) procedures.

Methods to generate cartridge casings with MIM processes exist, but these are limited in that only a small portion/section of the case is made via MIM processes (e.g., the case is made with an MIM formed insert). For example, the bulk of the case may comprise a polymer material that is attached to a MIM portion to form the cartridge case. While these and similar methods may employ MIM processes, they too can lead to increased complexity, higher cost, and inflexibility, and also do not meet all testing requirements such as, but not limited to, environmental conditioning tests. Furthermore, such designs can exhibit failure due to the joints of the multi-piece designs.

The present invention is directed toward overcoming one or more of the above-identified problems.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Disclosed is a cartridge case that may be used for ammunition, where the cartridge case consists essentially of or consists of a powdered metal and/or a powdered metal alloy that has been formed into the cartridge case through an injection mold processing. Also disclosed is a method of generating a cartridge case, which may include use of Metal Injection Molding (“MIM”). The method can further include use of Finite Element Method (“FEM”) analytics to control the product characteristics by generating operational parameters and predictively optimizing them to meet and/or exceed ammunition requirements. With the inventive method, the MIM process can generate a cartridge case by simply: 1) injection molding an initial part; and 2) tapering and/or trimming the initial part. The MIM cartridge case may also undergo secondary processing such as solution treatment, annealing, tempering, hardening, strengthening, tapering, etc. to further refine the performance.

The inventive method can provide a means to utilize alternative material (e.g., material other than brass) for ammunition cases in a manner that can meet desired production rates, reduce the load of a soldier carrying the ammunition comprising the cartridge case, reduce freight and shipping costs, holding tighter tolerances, meet all testing requirements, increased and more consistent performance, and/or reduce resources required to produce cartridge cases. Such materials can include high strength steel, mild steel, high strength stainless steel, duplex stainless steel, titanium alloy, etc. Other high and/or medium strength metals with sufficient strength to modulus ratios may also be used. One reason materials other than brass can be used may be due to the incorporation of FEM analysis methods via FEM software to generate a holistic approach that factors in many variables into the design process for the MIM component. In some embodiments, the inventive method can use FEM analytics to provide inputs that may be used during the MIM process so that a MIM design can optimized and meet target objectives. For example, the FEM software can be leveraged to determine which metals and/or metal alloys are feasible for a particular cartridge case design made by the MIM process. In this regard, the inventive method may cause the FEM software to take into account desired case material and mechanical characteristics, chamber pressures, weapon characteristics such as the chamber, bolt and extractor forces as well as other parameters that enable the cartridge case to be made with the MIM process and to function properly during use in a weapon. Thicknesses, geometries, and other attributes of the cartridge case can also be specifically tailored to produce lighter weight cases. For example, the inventive method can allow for the use of higher strength materials (in comparison to brass and other traditional cartridge case material), which can then enable tailoring certain geometries and dimensions of the cartridge case to lighten the cartridge case and/or increase the cartridge performance. The inventive method can thus provide for flexibility in mold design such that resulting case dimensions can be tailored to achieve material specific results which translates into enhances cartridge performance.

MIM is a readily available technology that is robust and has extensive industrial applications, and thus use of the inventive method may not require significant capital expenditure for manufacturers. A MIM process used with the inventive method can utilize commonly available equipment. Such equipment can also be scaled up accordingly. Further, manufacturers can use the inventive method to generate the cartridge case while availing existing methods of more down-stream production processes (e.g., loading the propellant, seating the projectile, seating the primer, sealing the case interfaces, etc.) Thus, the inventive method can be easily incorporated into most, if not all, processes for producing ammunition without causing major overhauls, re-tooling, and/or other disruptions.

As noted above, the inventive method can include use of FEM analytics to provide inputs that may be used during the MIM process. With such a method, robustness and flexibility can be introduced into the cartridge case production process to facilitate use of different materials in the production of cartridge cases and to generate case dimensions tailored to achieve material specific results. For instance, a cartridge case consisting essentially or consisting of a powdered metal and/or a powdered metal alloy can be made, where producing a cartridge case can: 1) retain traditional cartridge case dimensions set as standards for certain calibers of ammunition; 2) hold, contain, and/or be non-reactive with the propellant, the primer, and/or the projectile of the ammunition; 3) orient cartridge components in a weapon's chamber and/or align the projectile with a bore axis for proper engraving: 4) allow the cartridge case to recover after firing to permit easy extraction; 5) allow the cartridge case to act as a heat sink to reduce an amount of heat transfer to the weapon's chamber; 6) allow the cartridge case to be temperature resistant to avoid degradation and/or failure during firing; 7) facilitate sealing the breach of a weapon during the firing event, wherein progressive rearward obturation may be desirable; 8) survive handling, loading, and/or recoil forces; 9) be stable in long-term storage; 10) withstand harsh cold and hot environments; and/or 11) comprise a material that is non-sparking.

Although exemplary embodiments describe use of the inventive method for small caliber cartridge cases, medium and large (i.e., any caliber) cartridge cases can also be produced without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Further, the inventive method can be used to produce parts other than cartridge cases (e.g., bullets, primers, variants of cases, etc.).

In an exemplary embodiment, a method for producing a cartridge case can include generating an initial part by subjecting a Metal Injection Molding (MIM) material to an MIM process. The method can further include at least one of tapering and trimming the initial part to generate the cartridge case. The cartridge case may include an elongated member with a head at its first end, a mouth at its second end, and a body lying between the head and the mouth. The body may further include sidewalls conjoined with a base to form a hollow cavity to contain propellant. The base may further include a primer pocket structured to receive and retain a primer. The primer pocket may further include a vent formed within the primer pocket that extends from the primer pocket to the hollow cavity. The head may further include the base and a rim that extends radially from the base to generate an extractor groove. The mouth may be configured to receive and retain a projectile.

Some embodiments can include at least one of mixing and kneading powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy with an organic binder material to form the feedstock MIM material. Some embodiments can include at least partially melting or fully melting the binder material to form a semisolid metal-binder slurry. Some embodiments can include injecting the semisolid metal-binder slurry into a die cavity to form a green preform. Some embodiments can include at least one of thermally debinding and chemically or solvent debinding the green preform to generate a net-shape component. The embodiments include sintering the net-shape component for densification and to generate the initial part. In some embodiments, the at least one of tapering and trimming the initial part to generate the cartridge case comprises generating the cartridge case with a shoulder formed as a portion of the sidewalls that steps radially in towards the hollow cavity. In some embodiments, the at least one of tapering and trimming the initial part to generate the cartridge case comprises generating the cartridge case with a neck that extends out from the shoulder in a direction parallel or substantially parallel to the sidewalls. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the sidewalls exhibits a taper (i.e., rifle ammunition). In some embodiments, at least a portion of the sidewalls is straight walled (i.e., pistol ammunition). In some embodiments, at least a portion of the cartridge case exhibits desired variations in thickness, hardness, ductility, and/or strength. In some embodiments, the cartridge case consists essentially of powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy that has been subjected to the MIM process.

In another exemplary embodiment, a method for producing a cartridge case can include using Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis to generate variables representing factors and characteristics associated with enabling the cartridge case to be made via a Metal Injection Molding (MIM) processes and to enable an MIM generated cartridge case to function properly during subsequent use as ammunition in a weapon. The method can further include generating operating parameters based on the variables to include as inputs for the MIM process. The method can further include mixing or kneading powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy with a binder material to form a MIM feedstock material. The method can further include Metal Injection Molding the MIM material into a MIM initial part via the MIM process. The MIM process may include at least partially melting the binder material to form a semisolid metal-binder slurry. The MIM process may further include injecting the semisolid metal-binder slurry into a die cavity to form a green preform. The MIM process may further include thermally debinding and/or chemically debinding the green preform to generate a net-shape component. The MIM process may further include sintering the net-shape component for densification and to generate the MIM initial part. The MIM process may further include at least one of tapering and trimming the initial part to generate the cartridge case.

Some embodiments include transmitting the operational parameters from a FEM computer device to a MIM system. Some embodiments include establishing a set of parameters from traditional cartridge case designs to use as a baseline within the FEM analysis. In some embodiments, the cartridge case can include an elongated member with a head at its first end, a mouth at its second end, and a body lying between the head and the mouth. The body may further include sidewalls conjoined with a base to form a hollow cavity to contain propellant. The base may further include a primer pocket structured to receive and retain a primer. The primer pocket may further include a vent formed within the primer pocket that extends from the primer pocket to the hollow cavity. The head may further include the base and a rim that extends radially from the base to generate an extractor groove. The mouth may be configured to receive and retain a projectile. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the cartridge case exhibits desired variations in thickness, tolerances, hardness, ductility, and/or strength. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the sidewalls exhibits a taper. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the sidewall is straight walled.

In another exemplary embodiment, a cartridge case can include a body with a head at a first distal end and a mouth at a second distal end, wherein the cartridge case consists essentially of powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy that is formed into the cartridge case through an injection mold processing. In some embodiments, the cartridge case consists of the powdered metal and/or the powdered metal alloy that is formed into the cartridge case through the injection mold processing.

Some conventional cartridge cases made from material other than brass may not be reloadable, or may be prone to defects upon reloading. For example, some conventional cartridge cases made from aluminum can be prone to splitting is subjected to the forced and/or processing used to reload. Some conventional cartridge cases made from polymers or telescoping cases, for example, may not be reloaded. Embodiments of the inventive cartridge case, however, can be reloaded. For example, use of the FEM analysis and the MIM process can allow for production of cartridge cases made from material other than brass that can be reloaded due to the proper balance of ductility and strength determined by the FEA analysis.

While these potential advantages are made possible by technical solutions offered herein, they are not required to be achieved. The presently disclosed cartridge case and method of production can be implemented to achieve technical advantages, whether or not these potential advantages, individually or in combination, are sought or achieved.

Further features, aspects, objects, advantages, and possible applications of the present invention will become apparent from a study of the exemplary embodiments and examples described below, in combination with the Figures, and the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

The above and other objects, aspects, features, advantages and possible applications of the present invention will be more apparent from the following more particular description thereof, presented in conjunction with the following Figures, in which:

FIGS. 1A-1B show an exemplary cartridge case that may be created via the inventive method, and a cross section of the cartridge case of taken along the C3-C3 line (see FIG. 1A), respectively.

FIG. 2 shows an exemplary method of generating a cartridge case.

FIG. 3 shows a cross-section of an exemplary cartridge case that has been further processed for tapering and trimming (image from “The Cartridge Case”, IIT Research Institute, Nov. 15, 1968).

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary hardness profile of a cartridge case that may be used as a factor within Finite Element Method analysis when implementing the inventive method (image from “The Cartridge Case”, IIT Research Institute, Nov. 15, 1968).

FIG. 5 shows an exemplary Metal Injection Molding (MIM) process that may be used with the inventive method (image from http://www.piminternational.com/aboutpim/binders).

FIG. 6 shows a graph of expansion v. stress in the cartridge case wall, comparing steel to brass that may be further analyzed in an FEM analysis (image from “The Cartridge Case”, IIT Research Institute, Nov. 15, 1968).

FIG. 7 shows comparisons of various factors that may be used to generate or optimize variables in an FEM analysis.

FIG. 8 shows the relation between expansion and stress during obturation that may be used to generate variables in an FEM analysis (image from Carlucci, Donald E. and Jacobson, Sidney S. Ballistics: Theory and Design of Guns and Ammunition, CRCPress, Boca Raton, Fla., 2008, pp. 108-110).

FIGS. 9A-9B show theoretical clearance v. strength-to-modulus ratios, and a chart comparing various factors of MIM generated cartridge cases, respectively, that may be used to generate variables in an FEM analysis.

FIGS. 10A-10B show data results for normalized distance from case head v. case hardness, and true strain v. true stress, respectively, that may be used to generate variables in an FEM analysis.

FIG. 11 shows time v. pressure for a firing pressure of a baseline firing simulation that may be used to generate variables in an FEM analysis.

FIG. 12 shows firing simulation geometry of a baseline firing simulation that may be used to generate variables in an FEM analysis.

FIG. 13 shows firing simulation bolt forces of a baseline firing simulation that may be used to generate variables in an FEM analysis.

FIGS. 14A-14B show firing simulation stresses of a baseline firing simulation for a maximum material condition (MMC) case and a least material condition (LMC) case, respectively, that may be used to generate variables in an FEM analysis.

FIG. 15A shows time v. extraction force of a firing simulation for three different case cartridges, and FIG. 15B shows time v. extraction force of a firing simulation MMC case and a firing simulation LMC case, which may be used to generate variables in an FEM analysis.

FIG. 16 shows an MIM cartridge case production process that may be used with the inventive method.

FIGS. 17A-17B show first and second MIM generated case cartridge designs, respectively, each demonstrating control of sidewall thickness and close geometric tolerances that may be achieved with the inventive method.

FIGS. 18A-18B show calculated internal cartridge case volumes for a baseline cartridge case and the two MIM generated cartridge cases of FIGS. 17A-17B.

FIG. 19 shows a comparison between a baseline cartridge case and various MIM generated cartridge cases, demonstrating an improvement in density and weight that may be achieved via the inventive method.

FIG. 20 shows a two-core design requiring secondary forming operations to create a taper on one end of the cartridge case that may be used with the inventive method.

FIG. 21 shows the external dimensions of a MIM generated net-shape component.

FIG. 22 shows the cross-sectional dimensions of two net-shape components that may be formed by the MIM process.

FIG. 23 shows a change in surface appearance and a reduction of mouth distortion due to formation of the taper.

FIG. 24 shows the surface hardness of the net-component (before tapering) and that of the case cartridge 10 (after tapering).

FIGS. 25-29 show the surface appearance of the net-shape component and the cartridge case after the first taper and after the second taper.

FIGS. 30-32 show SEM imagery of surface microstructure of the net-shape component, the cartridge case after the first taper, and the cartridge case after the second taper, respectively.

FIG. 33 shows light optical microstructure of the cartridge case.

FIG. 34 shows the external dimensions of the MIM generated net-shape component with a heat treatment of at a H900 condition.

FIG. 35 shows the cross-sectional dimensions of two net-shape components with a heat treatment of at a H900 condition.

FIG. 36 shows the surface hardness as a result of the H900 treatment.

FIGS. 37-39 show the surface appearance of the net-shape component as-sintered, the net-shaped component after conditioned to H900 and the net-shaped component conditioned to H900 and after the taper is formed.

FIGS. 40-41 show SEM imagery of surface microstructure of the net-shape component at H900 and the net-shaped component at H900 and tapered, respectively.

FIG. 42 shows light optical microstructure of the net-shaped component conditioned at H900.

FIG. 43 shows the external dimensions of a MIM generated net-shape component with a heat treatment of at a H1150M condition.

FIG. 44 shows the cross-sectional dimensions of two net-shape components with a heat treatment of at a H1150M condition.

FIG. 45 shows the surface hardness as a result of the H1150M treatment.

FIGS. 46-48 show the surface appearance of the net-shape component as-sintered, the net-shaped component after conditioned to H1150M, and the net-shaped component conditioned to H1150M and after the taper is formed.

FIGS. 49-50 show SEM imagery of surface microstructure of the net-shape component at H1150M and the net-shaped component at H1150M and tapered, respectively.

FIG. 51 shows light optical microstructure of the net-shaped component conditioned at H1150M.

FIG. 52 shows the external dimensions of the MIM generated net-shape component with a heat treatment of at a H1150 condition.

FIG. 53 shows the cross-sectional dimensions of two net-shape components with a heat treatment of at a H1150 condition.

FIG. 54 shows the surface hardness as a result of the H150 treatment.

FIGS. 55-56 show SEM imagery of surface microstructure of the net-shape component at H1150 and the net-shaped component at H1150 and tapered, respectively.

FIG. 57 shows light optical microstructure of the net-shaped component conditioned at H1150.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following description is of an embodiment presently contemplated for carrying out the present invention. This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of describing the general principles and features of the present invention. The scope of the present invention should be determined with reference to the claims.

Referring to FIGS. 1-2, embodiments herein can include a cartridge case 10 that consists essentially of or consists of a powdered metal and/or a powdered metal alloy 110 that has been formed into the cartridge case 10 through an injection mold processing. Also disclosed is a method for forming a cartridge case 10, which may include use of Metal Injection Molding (“MIM”) 100 to produce the cartridge case 10. Further embodiments can include use of Finite Element Method (“FEM”) analytics (which may be done through FEM software) to take into account desired material and mechanical characteristics and other parameters that enable the cartridge case 10 to be made in the MIM process 100 and to function properly during subsequent use as ammunition in a weapon. Further embodiments can include use of the FEM analytics to provide inputs that may be used during the MIM process 100.

Referring to FIG. 3, a cartridge case 10 can include a hollow elongated member with a first end and a second end. In some embodiments, the cartridge case 10 can be segmented into three portions, which may be a head 12 at the first distal end, a mouth 16 at the second distal end, and a body 14 lying between the head 12 and the mouth 16. The body 14 can further include sidewalls 18 conjoined with a base 20 to form a hollow cavity 22. The hollow cavity 22 may be used to contain a propellant (e.g., gun powder) when using the cartridge case 10 as ammunition. The body 14 can have a general cylindrical structure so as to facilitate insertion of the cartridge case 10 into a chamber and/or bore of a weapon. The base 20 can further include a primer pocket 24 configured to receive and retain a primer. The primer pocket 24 can include a vent 26 to provide a means for heat exchange (e.g., spark of flame) between the primer and the propellant located in the hollow cavity 22 and to ignite the propellant. In some embodiments, the vent 26 can be an aperture formed within the primer pocket 24 that extends from the primer pocket 24 to the hollow cavity 22. The sidewalls 18 can have a thickness. Any portion of the sidewalls 18 can be structured to be thicker and/or stronger at and/or near the head 12 of the cartridge case 10. In some embodiments, the thickness and/or strength of at least a portion of the sidewalls 18 can change gradually from the mouth 16 to the head 12. In other embodiments, the thickness and/or strength of any portion of the sidewalls 18 can change gradually from any portion of the sidewalls 18 to the head 12. For example, a portion of the sidewalls 18 near the head 12 can be made to be progressively thicker and/or stronger as it leads into the head 12. In some embodiments, any portion of the sidewalls 18 can exhibit a taper. For example, the at least a portion of the sidewalls 18 may exhibit a narrowing taper towards the mouth 16.

The sidewalls 18 can extend from the head 12 and may lead into a shoulder 28. The shoulder 28 may lead into a neck 30. The neck 30 may lead into the mouth 16. The shoulder 28 can be a portion of the sidewalls 18 that steps radially in towards the hollow cavity 22 as the sidewalls 18 extend toward the neck 30 so as to reduce the radius of the sidewalls 18 more sharply than the taper does. The shoulder 28 can terminate at the neck 30. The neck 30 can extend out from the shoulder 28 in a direction parallel, or substantially parallel, to the sidewalls 18, where a distal end of the neck 30 can be the mouth 16. In some embodiments, the thickness of any portion of the sidewalls 18 can be thinner at and/or near the shoulder 28, the neck 30, and/or the mouth 16. This may be done to facilitate progressive rearward obturation.

In at least one embodiment, the body 14 portion can include material and structural configurations that balance ductility with strength so as to not be too brittle and not be too ductile. If too brittle, the cartridge case 10 may have a tendency to circumferential rupture and split. If too ductile, the cartridge case 10 may be prone to extraction problems when the cartridge case 10 is ejected from the weapon.

The head 12 can be a circular structure at the first distal end of the body 14 that leads into the base 20. The primer pocket 24 can be formed into the head 12 so as to generate a receptacle embedded within the base 20 portion of the head 12. The primer, generally comprising a primer cup and an igniting element, can be contained within the primer pocket 24. The vent 26 can be an aperture formed within the primer pocket 24 that extends from the primer pocket 24, through a web 38 portion of the head 12, and into the hollow cavity 22. The head 12 can further include a rim 32 that may extend radially from the base 20, which may serve as a catching lip to allow a portion of a weapon's receiver (e.g., a bolt) to engage therewith. For example, the rim 32 can generate an extractor groove 34 to allow the weapon's receiver to engage the cartridge case 10.

The rim 32 can further include a bevel 36 to assist with proper placement and smooth engagement with the weapon's receiver. In some embodiments, the head 12 can be rigid enough to permit obturation of a primer cup against the primer pocket 24, and also be sufficiently ductile to permit staking or crimping of the primer cup. The head 12 may also exhibit sufficient strength so as to not rupture and/or split during firing the ammunition comprising the cartridge case 10. The head 12 should also be structured to prevent or avoid yielding and/or permanent deformation.

The mouth 16 can be configured to receive and retain a projectile or bullet (both axially and concentrically). The mouth 16 may be ductile enough to facilitate press fitting the bullet into the mouth 16 by crimping the mouth 16 onto the bullet after the bullet is inserted into the mouth 16. The mouth 16 may be further configured so that the press fit forms a seal during firing (obturation). The mouth 16 can also be structured to rebound for ejection purposes.

Referring to FIG. 4, in some embodiments, the hardness of the cartridge case 10 can exhibit a differential hardness gradient along a length of the cartridge case 10. In at least one embodiment, hardness gradients, in conjunction with sidewall 18 tapers, can be used to force progressive rearward obturation.

Traditional case cartridges consist of brass, because brass cartridge cases tend to exhibit the desired characteristics that facilitate proper functioning of the ammunition comprising the brass cartridge case. However, brass may not be a preferred metal 110 for use with a MIM process 100, because of the material's insufficient strength. Brass' insufficient strength may be due to a lack of the ability to be work hardened, or at least be work hardened to a significant extent. Moreover, other materials exhibiting material and mechanical properties that differ from brass may be desirable for use as cartridge cases. For example, many other materials can be used to improve upon process technology of cartridge case production and to improve upon the operational characteristics of the ammunition comprising the cartridge case. The inventive method provides a means to do just that. Materials for use with the inventive method can be materials that exhibit high yield strength, low modulus of elasticity, adequate ductility, light-weight, corrosion resistance, temperature resistance (e.g., exhibit small to no changes in material properties when subjected to swings in temperature), waterproof aspects, and/or inert aspects. The materials can also be readily available and/or have a low material cost. Such materials can include, but are not limited to, stainless steels, titanium alloys, low alloy and high strength steel alloys, iron-nickel alloys, high strength aluminum alloys, etc. Some aluminum alloys may not be suitable for MIM processes due to their reactivity.

Referring to FIG. 5, the inventive method can utilize an MIM process 100 to produce a cartridge case 10. The MIM process 100 can be a metalworking process in which a powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy 110 may be mixed 120 and/or kneaded with a binder material 130 to generate a raw material or feedstock 140 that is capable of being subjected to injection mold processing 150 to form a part (e.g., cartridge case 10). The injection mold processing 150 may include metal injection mold forming. After injection mold processing, further material conditioning can be performed on the part. This can include binder removal 160, sintering 170 coalescing metal particles, and/or other processes to form a final part comprising the desired metal and/or metal alloy 110 and having the desired shapes and geometric dimensions of the cartridge case 10.

An exemplary MIM process 100 can include of mixing and/or kneading 120 a metal powder and/or a metal alloy powder 110 with a binder 130 to generate an MIM feedstock material 140. The binder 130 can be an organic wax/polymer-like binder. In some embodiments, the binder 130 can exhibit a high viscosity. In at least one embodiment, the MIM material 140 can be 60% or larger amount of steel powder comprising 22-micrometer range spheres and 40% or lower amount of binder. The mixing 120 can be done to generate a MIM material 140 in a form of granules and/or pellets. The granules and/or pellets can then be used as a feedstock material 140 in which the feedstock material 140 is subjected to MIM 150. During MIM 150, the binder 130 of the MIM material 140 can be at least partially melted to form a semisolid metal-binder slurry. The semisolid metal-binder slurry can be injected into a die cavity of a die to form a green preform. The die cavity can be of a shape that substantially conforms to a shape of a cartridge case 10 (or other component shape if the process is being used to produce a part other than a cartridge case). The green preform can then be thermally and/or chemically de-bound 160 to produce a net-shape component. The green preform can also be sintered 170 when producing the net-shape component. This may be done for densification of the green preform. In some embodiments, sintering 170 can be performed so as to generate a net-shape component exhibiting a density of approximate 99.9%. After thermally de-bounding 160, chemically de-bounding 160, and/or sintering 170, a MIM initial part is formed. The process can continue by tapering and/or trimming the MIM initial part to generate a MIM cartridge case 10 (see FIGS. 17A-17B).

MIM parts can shrink, for example, 20% from their molded dimensions during binder removal 160 and/or sintering 170. Thus, the mold 44 (see FIG. 20) can be made to be 20% larger than the final part. However, because MIM parts have little density gradient, shrinkage can be isotropic and repeatable. Thus, the MIM process 100 can generate net-shape components with very tight dimensional tolerances.

The inventive method can further include use of FEM analytics (which may be via FEM software) to establish parameters that are associated with enabling the cartridge case 10 to be made in the MIM process 100 and to function properly during use as ammunition in a weapon. As noted above, many different materials, other than brass, can be used with the MIM process 100. These materials can exhibit material and mechanical properties that vastly differ from brass. Brass has been the mainstay of traditional cartridge cases, and therefore its material and mechanical properties are well-known for tooling and process technology purposes. When using materials other than brass, parameters accounting for such material and mechanical differences can be factored. For example, using a higher strength material may enable generating a cartridge case 10 with thinner sidewalls 18 (and thus a lighter cartridge case 10), but it also must be ensured that the mouth 16 of the cartridge case 10 still exhibits rebound for ejection. As another example, steel's high modulus may require significant yield strength to achieve an adequate amount of recovery, as shown in FIG. 6. Thus, there may be several countervailing factors that must be accounted for. The factors may include, but are not limited to:

• • 1. Utilizing a powdered metal and/or a powdered metal alloy 110 as part of the MIM material 140 that exhibits sufficient strength to be subjected to injection molding processes. This may include a material having a strength to modulus ratio above 4.0.
  • 2. Utilizing a MIM material 140 that exhibits high yield strength, low modulus of elasticity, ductility (which may relate to proper bullet and primer insertion and crimp), light-weight, corrosion resistance, temperature resistance, thermal stability, material compatibility, waterproof aspects, inert aspects, being readily available, and/or has a low material cost.
  • 3. Feedstock 140 flowability (which may relate to mold fill).
  • 4. Elastic modulus and/or yield strength of the MIM material 140 (which may relate to proper firing and extraction).
  • 5. Shrinkage of the MIM generated part.
  • 6. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a head 12, a body 14, and a mouth 16 that includes the various subcomponent parts and shapes described herein.
  • 7. Generating a cartridge case 10 with dimensions that adhere to caliber and ballistic standards.
  • 8. Bolt force, extraction force, and/or plastic strain within the cartridge case 10 after firing, pocket radial deformation, and/or contact pressures between the cartridge case 10 and a barrel of the weapon. (See FIG. 7).
  • 9. Generating a cartridge case 10 with thicker and/or stronger sidewalls 18 at and/or near the head 12 of the cartridge case 10.
  • 10. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a change in thickness and/or strength along a portion of a length of at least a portion of the sidewalls 18.
  • 11. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a thinner thickness of at least a portion of the sidewalls 18 at and/or near the shoulder 28, the neck 30, and/or the mouth 16.
  • 12. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a taper along at least a portion of the sidewalls 18.
  • 13. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a differential hardness gradient along at least a portion of the length of the cartridge case 10.
  • 14. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a proper balance of ductility and strength within at least a portion of the body 14.
  • 15. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a narrowing taper at and/or near the mouth 16 of the cartridge case 10.
  • 16. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a head 12 that is rigid enough to permit obturation of a primer cup against the primer pocket 24 and that is ductile enough to permit staking and/or crimping of a primer cup.
  • 17. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a head 12 that is strong enough to not rupture and/or split during firing the ammunition comprising the cartridge case 10.
  • 18. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a head 12 that is structured to prevent and/or avoid yielding and/or permanent deformation.
  • 19. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a mouth 16 that can receive and retain a projectile axially and/or concentrically.
  • 20. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a mouth 16 that is ductile enough to facilitate press fitting the projectile into the mouth 16 by crimping the mouth 16 onto the bullet.
  • 21. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a mouth 16 that can facilitate a press fit, forming a seal during firing (obturation).
  • 22. Generating a cartridge case 10 with a mouth 16 that can rebound for ejection.
  • 23. Generating a cartridge case 10 that can retain current case dimensions set as standards for certain calibers of ammunition.
  • 24. Generating a cartridge case 10 that can hold, contain, and/or be non-reactive with the propellant, the primer, and/or the projectile of the ammunition.
  • 25. Generating a cartridge case 10 to facilitate orienting cartridge components in a weapon's chamber and/or align the projectile with a bore axis for proper engraving.
  • 26. Generating a cartridge case 10 that can allow the cartridge case 10 to recover after firing to permit easy extraction.
  • 27. Generating a cartridge case 10 that can allow the cartridge case 10 to act as a heat sink to reduce an amount of heat transfer to the weapon's chamber.
  • 28. Generating a cartridge case 10 that can allow the cartridge case 10 to be temperature resistant to avoid degradation or failure during firing.
  • 29. Generating a cartridge case 10 that can facilitate sealing the breach during the firing event.
  • 30. Generating a cartridge case 10 that can exhibit progressive rearward obturation.
  • 31. Generating a cartridge case 10 that can survive handling, loading, and/or recoil forces.
  • 32. Generating a cartridge case 10 that can be stable in long-term storage.
  • 33. Generating a cartridge case 10 that meets the cold and warm environmental requirements.
  • 34. Generating a cartridge case 10 that includes a MIM material 140 that is non-sparking.
  • 35. Generating a cartridge case 10 where initial firing pressure can force the sidewalls 18 against the chamber interior (obturation) of the weapon. (See FIG. 8).
  • 36. Generating a cartridge case 10 where cartridge case 10 expansion continues as the weapon's chamber expands elastically under firing pressure. (See FIG. 8).
  • 37. Generating a cartridge case 10 where both the cartridge case 10 and chamber recover from elastic deformation as firing pressure subsides. This may include the weapon chamber recovering fully (purely elastic) and cartridge case 10 recovering partially (plastic deformation). (See FIG. 8).

The above characteristics are at least some requirements of ammunition cartridge cases that may be used to enable the cartridge case 10 to be made with the MIM process 100 and/or to function properly during use in a weapon. Any one or any combination of these characteristics can be used by the inventive method to generate a cartridge case 10. For example, variables and parameters encompassing these characteristics can be used by the MIM process 100 making a cartridge case 10. This may be done using FEM analytics, which may be via a FEM software installed on a FEM computer device.

For example, these and other factors can be mathematically modeled and represented by variables. Algorithmic functions within the FEM software can then be generated, including use of these variables. The FEM software can then be operated on a computer device (FEM computer device) to develop a design which is delivered to a system operating the MIM process 100 (MIM system). For example, a user can input at least one variable into the FEM computer device, such as the dimensions and desired weight of the cartridge case 10 to be produced by the MIM system. The FEM computer device can then run at least one algorithm to generate at least one the operating parameter that would enable a MIM cartridge case design 10 exhibiting the desired characteristics. In some embodiments, the FEM computer device can be programmed to generate a plurality of operating parameters as a function of another operating parameter. For example, the FEM computer device may generate a set of operating parameters for each powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy 110 that would result in a cartridge case 10 having the desired dimensions and desired weight. A user may then select a powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy 110 with the most desirable characteristics to be used by the MIM system.

Proper functioning of a cartridge case 10 when used as ammunition can depend on many complex factors. To ensure that the MIM generated cartridge case 10 performs as expected when used as ammunition, a comparative analysis can be done. This can be incorporated into the inventive method, which may be further incorporated into the FEM analysis. For example, a set of parameters from known case designs (e.g., a traditional brass cartridge) can be used as a baseline. Thus, the inventive method can further include: 1) proposing a MIM material 140; 2) generating variables for cartridge case 10 forming process comparison; 3) generating variables for comparing the MIM material 140 to a known material (e.g., brass) to form a baseline; 4) selecting the MIM materials 140 and generating variables representing the selected MIM materials 140; 5) generating variables representing firing and extraction of ammunition comprising the MIM generated cartridge case 10; 6) generating variables representing recovery performance of the MIM cartridge case 10 after being formed into ammunition and being fired; 7) comparing MIM generated cartridge case 10 weights with baseline cartridge weights; 8) generating variables representing MIM generated cartridge case firing simulations with the baseline; 9) generating variables representing extraction performance; 10) analyzing the results and generating operating parameters for a selected MIM process 100; and, II) transmitting the operating parameters to the MIM system.

Simplified formulas (Equations 1 and 2) for firing and extraction can be performed to identify feasible MIM materials 140 and to evaluate and down-select MIM materials 140 at a high level before detailed analysis.

$\begin{array}{cc}{u}_{\mathrm{tube}}=\frac{a^{\prime }}{E_{\mathrm{tube}}\left(b^2-a^{\mathrm{\prime 2}}\right)}\hspace{1em}\left[\left(1-v\right)\left(p_1{a}^{\prime 2}-p_2{b}^2\right)+\left(1+v\right)b^2\left(p_1-p_2\right)\right]u_{\mathrm{case}}=\frac{a^2{p}_1}{E_{\mathrm{case}}h}{\sigma }_{\theta \theta }=\frac{{\mathrm{ap}}_1}{h}{\varepsilon }_{\theta \theta }=\frac{{\sigma }_{\theta \theta }}{E_{\mathrm{case}}}& \mathrm{Equation}\left(1\right)\\ {\varepsilon }_{\theta {\theta }_{\max }}-\varepsilon \gamma =\frac{{\sigma }_{\theta {\theta }_{\max }}-\sigma \gamma }{E_{\mathrm{case}\text{-}\mathrm{tangent}}}{\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{return}}=\frac{{\sigma }_{\theta {\theta }_{\max }}}{E_{\mathrm{case}}}{\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{residual}}={\varepsilon }_{\theta {\theta }_{\max }}-{\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{return}}{u}_{\mathrm{residual}}=a{\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{residual}}& \mathrm{Equation}\left(2\right)\end{array}$

(Eq. (1) and (2) referenced from Carlucci, Donald E. and Jacobson, Sidney S. Ballistics: Theory and Design of Guns and Ammunition, CRCPress, Boca Raton, Fla., 2008, pp. 108-110).

Case cartridges 10 with MIM materials 140 having a yield strength to modulus ratio above approximately 4.0 can perform equivalent to or better than a traditional brass cartridge. (See FIGS. 9A-9B). Thus, MIM materials 140 with a yield strength to modulus ratio above 4.0 may be preferred.

Generating variables for comparing the MIM material 140 to a known material (e.g., brass) to form a baseline can further include creating a baseline dynamic explicit Finite Element Analysis (“FEA”) firing simulation. This may include approximating exact weapon geometry and firing information based on actual data and/or publically available data. This may further include obtaining actual data from a traditional brass cartridge to include as part of the baseline. This may further include evaluations using at least one of maximum material conditions (“MMC”) and least material conditions (“LMC”) to understand the significance of cartridge case 10 tolerances. For example, MMC may lead to a least case-to-chamber clearance, a longer cartridge case 10, and/or little head space. A LMC may lead to a maximum case-to-chamber clearance, a shorter cartridge case 10, and/or large head space. Baseline responses can be compared to publically available literature references or existing test data to validate a model response.

Using a .50 caliber cartridge case as an example, FIGS. 10-15B show non-limiting examples of how baseline data can be generated and used in the inventive method. FIGS. 10A-10B show a traditional brass cartridge case hardness gradient modeled by assigning appropriate material properties to five discrete regions along the cartridge case length. FIG. 11 shows firing pressure of a baseline firing simulation, where internal case pressure can be applied in two phases: 1) primer ignition; and 2) propellant ignition. Primer ignition may be applied to all internal surfaces in the primer pocket 24. Propellant ignition may be applied to all internal cartridge case 10 surfaces and primer pocket 24 surfaces. Both pressures can be applied as uniform pressures. Pressure gradients may not be considered. FIG. 12 shows firing simulation geometry of a baseline firing simulation. FIG. 13 shows firing simulation bolt forces of a baseline firing simulation. As can be seen, bolt forces can be predicted to be within a range from 16,000 to 18,000 lbf, depending on cartridge case 10 tolerances and caliber. It should be noted that .50 caliber bolt force data was not publically available. 5.56 mm bolt forces were found to be approximately 3,500 lbf. This translates into a 2× geometric size difference between .50 caliber and 5.56 mm, and a 2× increase in diameter (4× increase in bolt area). Thus, the predicted .50 caliber forces are approximately 4× higher than the 5.56 mm forces, which is reasonable. These data can be used as part of the baseline to compare a MIM cartridge case 10 design.

FIGS. 14A-14B show firing simulation stresses of a baseline firing simulation for an MMC cartridge case 10 and an LMC cartridge case 10, respectively. As can be seen, uniform stress distributions were exhibited. Contact pressure was maintained between the cup and the primer for the entire firing event and during extraction. FIGS. 15A-15B show firing simulation extraction forces of a baseline firing simulation. Exact chamber and cartridge case dimensions used in generating literature data is unknown, but reasonable correlation with the limited available data can be used. These data can also be used as part of the baseline to compare a MIM cartridge case 10 design.

The MIM process 100 can significantly reduce the number of process steps and streamline the process used to produce cartridge cases 10, thus for reducing the total cost of ownership (TCO) for ammunition producers. For example, a traditional cartridge case production method includes at least the steps of: 1) forming a cup; 2) generating an initial draw from the cup; 3) generating a final draw from the cup; 4) forming a header; 5) turning the head; 6) piercing the base; 7) generating a first taper; 8) generating a second tapper; and, 9) trimming to generate a completed case. (See https://www.petersoncartridge.com/our-process/drawing-brass). This can be a complex forming process with multiple inspection points that requires high capital equipment and high personnel costs. Traditional cartridge case production methods can further result in relatively low piece-part price, a complex acquisition process for production, and/or a high total ownership cost (e.g., combined facility, personnel, equipment, inspection, piece part, etc.).

Conversely, the inventive method can use a MIM process 100 that may include as little as two steps: 1) metal injection molding an initial part; and, 2) tapering and trimming the part. (See FIG. 16). As contrasted with traditional cartridge case production methods, the inventive method can be a simpler process that involves less inspection points, low capital equipment costs, higher piece-part price, simpler acquisition processes for production, and/or lower total ownership costs.

A wide variety of materials may be used as the metal powder and/or metal alloy powder 110. Materials with a strength to modulus ratio above 4.0 may be used to ensure that the material performs equivalent to or better than traditional brass cartridge cases. It should be noted that aluminum and aluminum alloys can be very difficult to MIM. This may be due to difficulty in performing the sintering process 170 on aluminum and aluminum based MIM material 140 during densification. For example, innate aluminum oxide film on aluminum powder 110, along with possible contamination and possible oxidation during the de-binding process 160, can inhibit or even prevent the densification of an aluminum or aluminum alloy green preform into a net-shape cartridge case. In addition, an aluminum cartridge case 10 may be prone to burn-through during the firing event of the finished ammunition cartridge (e.g., catastrophic failure caused by burning of propellant and a reaction of the aluminum when the primer is ignited, i.e, thermite reaction).

MIM parts may shrink 20% from their molded dimensions during binder removal 160 and/or sintering 170. Because MIM parts have little density gradient, shrinkage is isotropic and repeatable. Thus, uniform cartridge case sidewall 18 thicknesses can be achieved for MIM generated cartridge cases 10 to ensure tolerances are met. However, mold design considerations can accommodate sidewall 18 thickness variations, if such variations are desired. To demonstrate this, two cartridge case 10 design configurations (Design 1 and Design 2) are shown in FIGS. 17A-17B, where the sidewall 18 thicknesses of each are compared to a traditional brass cartridge case (“baseline brass case”). FIG. 17A shows Design 1, which is a green MIM generated cartridge case 10 molded to yield dimensions similar to the baseline brass cartridge case after binder removal 160 and sintering 170. As shown, the external dimensions of the MIM generated cartridge case 10 are very similar to the baseline brass cartridge case but for minor deviations with respect to interior dimensions. Note that the MIM generated cartridge case 10 may require a subsequent taper operation after MIM processing 100. FIG. 17B shows Design 2, which is a green MIM generated cartridge case 10 molded to yield dimensions similar to the baseline brass case after binder removal 160 and sintering 170, but with an increased case body sidewall 18 thickness to facilitate MIM mold fill. Note that a minimal change in sidewall 18 thickness at or near the mouth 16 may be used to maintain bullet/case interface. Again, the MIM cartridge case 10 may require a subsequent taper operation after MIM process 100. FIGS. 17A-17B demonstrate the control of sidewall 18 thickness and close geometric tolerances that may be achieved with the inventive method. Thus, uniform cartridge case sidewall 18 thickness can be achieved through mold design considerations that accommodate thickness variation.

Referring to FIGS. 18A-18B, interior cartridge case volume (e.g., the volume of the hollow cavity 22) can be calculated and compared to a baseline interior cartridge case volume. Internal volume can be determined by Equation 3.

Internal Volume=V_vent+V_neck+V_body  Equation (3)

This may be done to determine and/or factor in propellant fill space and/or maximum charge. FIGS. 18A-18B show the calculated internal cartridge case volumes for the baseline cartridge case, the Design 1 cartridge case, and the Design 2 cartridge case.

The calculated internal volume and the previously established firing simulation data can be used to analyze the MIM generated cartridge case geometry. From this data, the baseline can then be re-established or refined by comparing the MIM generated cartridge case geometry with the cold worked brass material properties and hardness gradient. This may be done to develop an understanding of the impact of changes in geometry associated with the MIM generated cartridge case geometry.

As noted above, the inventive method can facilitate use of alternative materials, which may be higher in strength. His may allow for generating a cartridge case 10 that has less material density and weight, as compared to traditional cartridge cases. This can lighten the load a solder must carry, lower freight shipping costs, etc. FIG. 19 shows a comparison between the baseline cartridge case and various MIM generated cartridge cases 10, demonstrating the improvement in density and weight.

In FIG. 19:

• • MIM case design 1 used for volume and weight calculations.
  • It may be possible to further reduce 4140 HT and 17-4 weights by reducing volume in web and base to side wall transition with use of high yield strength material. However, further analysis and investigation are required to determine actual weight savings.

Some embodiments can include alternative means to generate a taper on the body 14 of the cartridge case 10. In at least one embodiment, a two-core (a first core 40 and a second core 42) design requiring secondary forming operations to create taper on one end of cartridge case 10 can be used. (See FIG. 20). Other embodiments can include creating two green pans (one of the end cap and one of the long case including the end taper), which may be joined during the debinding 160 and/or sintering 170 steps to create one cartridge case 10. Other embodiments can include creating an initial MIM with a taper using specialized tooling which may collapse to permit mold ejection which would create the cartridge case 10 in a single step.

In an exemplary embodiment, a cartridge case 10 can include a body 14 with a head 12 at a first distal end and a mouth 16 at a second distal end, wherein the cartridge case 10 consists essentially of powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy 110 that has been formed into the cartridge case 10 through an injection mold processing. In some embodiments, the cartridge case 10 consists of powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy 110 that has been formed into the cartridge case 10 through an injection mold processing.

A method for producing a cartridge case 10 can include generating an initial part by subjecting a MIM material 140 to MIM processing 150. The method can further include at least one of tapering and trimming the initial part to generate the cartridge case 10. This can generate a cartridge case 10 as an elongated member with a head 12 at its first end, a mouth 16 at its second end, and a body 14 lying between the head 12 and the mouth 16. The body 14 could include sidewalls 18 conjoined with a base 20 to form a hollow cavity 22 to contain propellant. The base 20 could further include a primer pocket 24 structured to receive and retain a primer. The primer pocket 24 could further include a vent 26 formed within the primer pocket 24 that may extend from the primer pocket 24 to the hollow cavity 22. The head 12 could further include the base 20 and a rim 32 that may extend radially from the base 20 to generate an extractor groove 34. The mouth 16 could further be configured to receive and retain a projectile.

Alternatively, or in addition, a method for producing a cartridge case 10 can include using FEM analysis to generate variables representing factors and characteristics associated with enabling the cartridge case 10 to be made via a MIM processes 100 and to enable an MIM generated cartridge case 10 to function properly during subsequent use as ammunition in a weapon. The method can include generating operating parameters based on the variables to control the MIM design 100. Mixing or kneading 120 powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy 110 with a binder material 130 can be done to form a MIM material 140. Metal Injection Molding 150 can be performed on the MIM material 140 to generate a MIM initial part. The Metal Injection Molding 150 can include at least partially melting the binder material 130 to form a semisolid metal-binder slurry, injecting the semisolid metal-binder slurry into a die cavity to form a green preform, thermally debinding 160 and/or chemically debinding 160 the green preform to generate a net-shape component, and sintering 170 the net-shape component for densification and to generate the MIM initial part. Tapering and trimming the initial part can be done to generate the cartridge case 10.

Before, during, and/or after the tapering and/or trimming, the net-shape component or the cartridge case 10 can be conditioned using a heat treatment and/or other metal working or can be used in the as sintered state. This can include solution treatment, annealing, tempering, hardening, strengthening, etc. For example, a cartridge case 10 including stainless steel material can be heat treated to a H900 condition, a H150M condition, a H1150 condition, etc. This may be done to improve performance of the case cartridge. FIGS. 21-57 show test results of net-shape components and case cartridges 10 produced by the MIM process 100, where the net-shape component and/or the case cartridge 10 was not heat treated, beat treated to a H900 condition, heat treated to a H1150M condition, and heat treated to a H1150 condition.

FIGS. 21-33 show test results of a net-shape component and a case cartridge comprising 17-4PH stainless steel formed by the MIM process 100 without additional heat treatment. FIG. 21 shows the external dimensions of the MIM generated net-shape component. Distortion was observed at the mouth 16. Two net-shaped components (net-shape component 1 and net-shape component 2) were generated and compared. Slight variations in dimensions and densities were observed between net-shape component 1 and net-shape component 2. FIG. 22 shows the cross-sectional dimensions of net-shape component 1 and net-shape component 2. The dimensional variations may be due to electrical discharge machining (“EDM”) cutting errors. FIG. 23 shows a change in surface appearance and a reduction of mouth 16 distortion after the first taper and/or second taper is formed. For example, the grainy-like appearance from the net-shape component changed to a smooth shiny surface after the second taper was formed. FIG. 24 shows the surface hardness of the net-component (before tapering) and that of the case cartridge 10 (after tapering). FIG. 24 shows that the surface hardness of the cartridge case 10 head 12 is slightly higher than that of the body 14. The surface hardness of the cartridge case 10 body 10 is uniform. The through wall thickness hardness of the cartridge case 10 head 12 is comparable to that of its surface. The through thickness hardness of the cartridge case 10 mouth 16 is slightly higher than that of the cartridge case 10 body 14. As can be seen, there is a slight increase of the hardness of the cartridge case 10 body 10 surface (˜7%) after tapering. The hardness of the tapered mouth 16 surface of the cartridge case 10 increased by approximately 17% due to cold working. The as-sintered cartridge case 10 has a hardness lower than that of the H1150M Condition (See FIGS. 43-45). For example, the as sintered cartridge case 10 has a hardness of 29-31Rc. The cartridge case 10 heat treated to H1150 has a hardness of 33 Rc˜(327 HV).

FIGS. 25-29 show the surface appearance of the net-shape component and the cartridge case 10 after the first taper and after the second taper. Incipient surface cracks appeared in the cartridge case 10 after the first and second taper. The cracks are in the longitudinal direction and adjacent to the partition line flash. The “shinny” surface appearance of the cartridge case 10 body 14 after forming the second taper may indicate high friction produced surface deformation. The net-shape component shows some grain directionality and thermal etching. Cracks formed after the first taper are in the longitudinal direction, along the elongated grain boundaries. The cracks may be the result of a shear stress produced by flash material of a partition line flash. The partition line flash was flattened during the first and second taper (see FIGS. 31-32). Grain elongation occurred after the second taper, which is due to cold forming induced by tapering.

FIGS. 30-32 show SEM imagery of surface microstructure of the net-shape component, the cartridge case 10 after the first taper, and the cartridge case 10 after the second taper, respectively. Referring to FIG. 30, the net-shape component exhibited a parallel band-like appearance at the surface. The parallel bands are in the longitudinal direction of the tubular axis of the net-shape component. This may indicate the flow of the MIM material. A thin and narrow mold partition line appeared, and the partition line had a wavy-like (sinusoidal) appearance. Coarse Copper precipitation was observed at the grain boundaries. Equiaxed grains were also observed. Referring to FIG. 31, slight grain deformation in the direction of taper was observed. Crack initiation started to occur at the side of the partition line flash. Flattening of the flash also started to occur. Referring to FIG. 32, grain deformation and smearing (galling) in the direction of taper forming was observed. Cracking development adjacent to the partition line flash was observed. Complete flattening of the flash line also occurred.

FIG. 33 shows light optical microstructure of the cartridge case 10, which demonstrates a uniform microstructure including equiaxed martensitic grains with extensive inter and intragranular copper precipitation. The mouth 16 and the body 14 of the cartridge case 10 had a lesser amount of porosity than that observed in the cartridge case 10 head 12. There is some possible ferrite at the grain boundaries of the cartridge case 10 head 12 microstructure.

FIGS. 34-42 show test results of a net-shape component and a case cartridge comprising 17-4PH stainless steel formed by the MIM process 100 with a heat treatment at a H900 condition. FIG. 34 shows the external dimensions of the MIM generated net-shape component. The grainy-like appearance from the as-sintered condition changed to a smoother surface after heat treatment and forming of the first and/or second taper. The mouth outer diameter (“OD”) distortion of the as-sintered case remained after heat treatment, but it disappeared after the first and/or second taper was formed. The partition line along the longitudinal axis still remained after heat treatment and after the first and second tapering. The density of the H900 condition material increased from 7.33 g/cm³ to 7.762 g/cm³ due to the H900 heat treatment. FIG. 35 shows the cross-sectional dimensions of two net-shape components (net-shape component 1 and net-shape component 2). The dimensional variations may be due to electrical discharge machining (“EDM”) cutting errors. FIG. 36 shows the surface hardness as a result of the H900 treatment. The surface hardness of the net-shape component head 12 is slightly higher than that of the body 14. The surface hardness of the net-shape component body 10 is uniform. The through wall thickness hardness of the net-shape component head 12 is comparable to that of its surface. The through thickness hardness of the net-shape component mouth 16 is slightly higher than that of the net-shape component body 14. The average hardness of the net-shape component at the H900 condition (42-45 Rc) is comparable to that of the wrought alloy H1150M (40-48 Rc). The hardness of a net-shape component with a tapered mouth 16 was not measured but it is expected to increase due to cold working.

FIGS. 37-39 show the surface appearance of the net-shape component as-sintered, the net-shaped component after conditioned to H900 and the net-shaped component conditioned to H900 and after the taper is formed. Very well defined partition line flash was observed in both the net-shape component as-sintered and in the net-shaped component after conditioned to H900. A very fine band-like pattern along the axis of the tube in was observed in all three. Grain elongation occurred due to the cold forming induced by tapering. No cracks were observed after the forming of the taper. The net-shaped component after conditioned to H900 exhibited a grainy-like appearance, equiaxed grain structure was observed at the surface, and no cracks were observed at the partition line flash or at adjacent regions. The partition line flash for the net-shaped component after conditioned to H900 was approximately 25-35 μm tall. The net-shaped component conditioned to H900 with a taper exhibited a crack after the second taper was generated. The crack was observed adjacent to the partition line flash. The crack was shallow and had depth of approximately 10-15 μm. The partition line flash was flattened by the forming of the second taper.

FIGS. 40-41 show SEM imagery of surface microstructure of the net-shape component at H900 and the net-shaped component at H900 and tapered, respectively. Referring to FIG. 40, the band-like appearance disappeared after beat treatment. A thin and narrow mold partition line flash with wavy-like (sinusoidal) appearance was observed. Coarse Copper precipitation at the grain boundaries was not present. Equiaxed grains were observed. Referring to FIG. 41, grain deformation and smearing (galling) in the direction of taper forming occurred. Surface cracking adjacent to the partition line flash was observed. Complete flattening of the partition line flash was also observed.

FIG. 42 shows light optical microstructure of the net-shaped component conditioned at H900, which demonstrates a uniform microstructure including equiaxed martensitic grains with extensive inter and intragranular copper precipitation. The mouth 16 and the body 14 had a lesser amount of porosity than that observed in the head 12. The microstructure of all sections of the component show presence of some ferrite.

FIGS. 43-51 show test results of a net-shape component and a case cartridge comprising 17-4PH stainless steel formed by the MIM process 100 with a heat treatment at a H1150M condition. FIG. 43 shows the external dimensions of the MIM generated net-shape component. The grainy-like appearance from the as-sintered condition changed to a smoother surface after heat treatment and forming of the first and/or second taper. The mouth distortion of the as-sintered case remained after heat treatment, but it disappeared after the first and/or second taper was formed. The partition flash along the longitudinal axis still remained after heat treatment and after the first and second tapering. The density of the H1150M condition material increased from 7.33 g/cm³ to 7.579 g/cm³ due to the H1150M heat treatment. FIG. 44 shows the cross-sectional dimensions of two net-shape components (net-shape component 1 and net-shape component 2). The dimensional variations may be due to electrical discharge machining (“EDM”) cutting errors. FIG. 45 shows the surface hardness as a result of the H1150M treatment. The surface hardness of the net-shape component head 12 is slightly higher than that of the body 14. The surface hardness of the net-shape component body 10 is uniform. The through wall thickness hardness of the net-shape component head 12 is comparable to that of its surface. The through thickness hardness of the net-shape component mouth 16 is slightly higher than that of the net-shape component body 14. The average hardness of the net-shape component at the H1150 condition (23-25 Rc) is much lower than that of the wrought alloy H1150M (33 Rc). The hardness of a net-shape component with a tapered mouth 16 was not measured but it is expected to increase due to cold working.

FIGS. 46-48 show the surface appearance of the net-shape component as-sintered, the net-shaped component after conditioned to H1150M, and the net-shaped component conditioned to H1150M and after the taper is formed. Very well defined partition line flash was observed in both the net-shape component as-sintered and in the net-shaped component after conditioned to H1150M. A very fine band-like pattern along the axis of the tube was observed in all three. Grain elongation due to the cold forming induced by tapering occurred. No cracks were observed after the forming of the taper. The net-shaped component after conditioned to H1150M exhibited a grainy-like appearance, equiaxed grain structure was observed at the surface, and no cracks were observed at the partition line flash or at adjacent regions. The partition line flash for the net-shaped component after conditioned to H1150M was approximately 20-30 μm tall. The net-shaped component conditioned to H1150M after the taper is formed exhibited a crack after the second taper was generated. The crack was observed adjacent to the partition line flash. The crack had depth of approximately 40-50 μm. The partition line flash was flattened by the forming of the second taper.

FIGS. 49-50 show SEM imagery of surface microstructure of the net-shape component at H1150M and the net-shaped component at H1150M and tapered, respectively. Referring to FIG. 49, the band-like appearance disappeared after heat treatment but shallow parallel gashes were observed. A thin and narrow mold partition line flash with wavy-like (sinusoidal) appearance was observed. Coarse Copper precipitation at the grain boundaries was not present. Equiaxed grains were observed. Referring to FIG. 50, grain deformation and smearing (galling) in the direction of taper forming occurred. Surface cracking adjacent to the partition line flash was not observed. Complete flattening of the partition line flash was also observed.

FIG. 51 shows light optical microstructure of the net-shaped component conditioned at H1150M, which demonstrates a uniform microstructure including equiaxed martensitic grains with extensive inter and intragranular copper precipitation. A relatively large amount of porosity was observed in all regions. The microstructure of all sections of the component show presence of some ferrite.

FIGS. 52-57 show test results of a net-shape component and a case cartridge comprising 17-4PH stainless steel formed by the MIM process 100 with a heat treatment at a H1150 condition. FIG. 52 shows the external dimensions of the MIM generated net-shape component. The grainy-like appearance from the as-sintered condition changed to a smoother surface after heat treatment and forming of the first and/or second taper. The mouth OD distortion of the as-sintered case remained after heat treatment, but it disappeared after the first and/or second taper was formed. The partition flash along the longitudinal axis still remained after heat treatment and after the first and second tapering. The density of the H1150 condition material increased from 7.33 g/cm³ to 7.807 g/cm³ due to the H1150 heat treatment. FIG. 53 shows the cross-sectional dimensions of two net-shape components (net-shape component 1 and net-shape component 2). The dimensional variations may be due to electrical discharge machining (“EDM”) cutting errors. Heat treatment did not cause distortion or dimensional changes. FIG. 54 shows the surface hardness as a result of the H1150 treatment. The surface hardness of the net-shape component neck 30 is lower than that of the body 14 and the head 12. The surface hardness of the net-shape component body 10 is comparable to that of the head 12. The through wall thickness hardness of the net-shape component head 12 is uniform from the head 12 to the neck 30. The average hardness of the net-shape component at the MIM H1150M condition (30 Rc) is lower than that of the wrought alloy H1150M (33 Rc). The hardness of a net-shape component with a tapered mouth 16 was not measured but it is expected to increase due to cold working. Surface appearance stereoscopic analysis of the net-shape component in the H1150 conditions was not conducted but it is expected to show similar to that of the net-shape components heat treated at the H1150M condition.

FIGS. 55-56 show SEM imagery of surface microstructure of the net-shape component at H1150 and the net-shaped component at H1150 and tapered, respectively. Referring to FIG. 55, the band-like appearance disappeared after heat treatment. A thin and narrow mold partition flash line with wavy-like (sinusoidal) appearance was observed. Coarse Copper precipitation at the grain boundaries was not present. Equiaxed grains were observed. Referring to FIG. 56, extensive grain deformation (flattening) and smearing (galling) of the partition line flash occurred during tapering. Grain deformation and smearing in the direction of the taper forming was observed. Surface cracking adjacent to the partition line flash was not observed.

FIG. 57 shows light optical microstructure of the net-shaped component conditioned at H1150, which demonstrates a uniform microstructure including equiaxed martensitic grains with extensive inter and intragranular copper precipitation. A relatively large amount of porosity was observed in all regions. The microstructure of all sections of the component show presence of some ferrite.

All net-shape component and cartridge cases 10 examined were sound and free of visual defects. Also, in all cases a minor distortion of the mouth 16 was present. However, distortion of the mouth 16 was eliminated during tapering. The case 10 dimensions were close to what was expected. Stereoscopic microscopy of the cartridge case 10 surface shows a grainy-like appearance forming fine parallel bands in the longitudinal axis of case 10. The inspection also shows a partition line flash in the longitudinal direction. This flash was produced by the narrow gap between the mating of the molding dies. Surface cracks parallel to the longitudinal axis were formed during the tapering process, and these cracks were observed adjacent to the partition line flash. These cracks were only observed in the as-sintered and H900 heat treated condition cases 10. The flash line may be responsible for uneven shear stresses, which may have led to the crack formation. During tapering, the flash was flattened and galling occurred.

Cold forming of the taper on cases 10 heat treated to the H1150 and H1150M conditions did not cause cracking but galling at the flash line and at adjacent regions was observed. The microstructure of the as-sintered and heat treated MIM 17-4 PH stainless steel cases 10 consists of martensite and copper precipitates. The copper precipitates are coarser in the as-sintered material and are very fine in the heat treated alloy. Some ferrite is possibly found to be present in all as-sintered and heat treated alloy cases; however, X-ray diffraction may be necessary to ascertain its presence in the MIM alloy. A relative increase in density (3-5%) with respect to the as-sintered condition was observed with the various heat treatments used. Table I shows the hardness for all as-sintered and heat treated MIM cases 10. As expected, the H900 condition was the hardest and was comparable to that of the wrought alloy. The as-sintered is similar to the H1150 condition. The H1150 M had the lower hardness.

TABLE I
Metal injection Molded 17-PH Stainless Steel Hardness Vickers
and Rockwell C (Rc) for the Various Heat treatment Conditions
Heat	Head	Central Body
Treatment	Through		Through
Condition	Thickness	Surface	Thickness	Surface
As Sintered	307 (31 Rc)	307 (31 Rc)	295 (26 Rc)	295 (26 Rc)
H900	409 (42 Rc)	414 (42 Rc)	436 (44 Rc)	385 (39 Rc)
H1150	305 (30 Rc)	307 (31 Rc)	304 (30 Rc)	310 (31 Rc)
H1150M	269 (25 Rc)	260 (24 Rc)	255 (23 Rc)	264 (25 Rc)
Heat	Neck	Neck
Treatment	Through		Taper(*)
Condition	Thickness	Surface	Surface	Wrought
As Sintered	305 (30 Rc)	295 (26 Rc)	346 (35 Rc)	—
H900	442 (45 Rc)	386 (39 Rc)		45 Rc
H1150	308 (31 Rc)	263 (25 Rc)		35 Rc
H1150M	266 (25 Rc)	264 (25 Rc)		33 Rc
(*)Increase in hardness due to cold work of the neck taper of the case.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous modifications and variations of the described examples and embodiments are possible in light of the above teachings of the disclosure. The disclosed examples and embodiments are presented for purposes of illustration only. Other alternate embodiments may include some or all of the features disclosed herein. Therefore, it is the intent to cover all such modifications and alternate embodiments as may come within the true scope of this invention, which is to be given the full breadth thereof. Additionally, the disclosure of a range of values is a disclosure of every numerical value within that range, including the end points.

Claims

1-14. (canceled)

15. A method for producing a cartridge case, the method comprising: using Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis to generate variables representing factors and characteristics associated with enabling the cartridge case to be made via a Metal Injection Molding (MIM) processes and to enable an MIM generated cartridge case to function properly during subsequent use as ammunition in a weapon;generating operating parameters based on the variables to include as inputs for the MIM process;mixing or kneading powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy with a binder material to form a MIM material;Metal Injection Molding the MIM material into a MIM initial part via the MIM process, the MIM process comprising: at least partially melting the binder material to form a semisolid metal-binder slurry;injecting the semisolid metal-binder slurry into a die cavity to form a green preform;thermally de-bounding and/or chemically de-bounding the green preform to generate a net-shape component; and,sintering the net-shape component for densification and to generate the MIM initial part.

16. The method recited in claim 15, further comprising at least one of tapering and trimming the initial part to generate the cartridge case.

17. The method recited in claim 15, further comprising establishing a set of parameters from traditional cartridge case designs to use as a baseline within the FEM analysis.

18. The method recited in claim 15, wherein the cartridge case comprises: an elongated member with a head at its first end, a mouth at its second end, and a body lying between the head and the mouth, wherein; the body further comprises sidewalls conjoined with a base to form a hollow cavity to contain propellant, the base further comprising a primer pocket structured to receive and retain a primer, the primer pocket further comprising a vent formed within the primer pocket that extends from the primer pocket to the hollow cavity;the head further comprising the base and a rim that extends radially from the base to generate an extractor groove; and,the mouth further configured to receive and retain a projectile.

19. The method recited in claim 15, wherein at least a portion of the cartridge case exhibits desired variations in thickness, hardness, ductility, and/or strength.

20. The method recited in claim 18, wherein at least a portion of the sidewalls exhibits a taper.

21. The method recited in claim 18, wherein at least a portion of the sidewalls is straight walled.

22. The method recited in claim 15, wherein the cartridge case comprises a body with a head at a first distal end and a mouth at a second distal end, wherein the cartridge case consists essentially of powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy that is formed into the cartridge case through an injection mold processing.

23. The method recited in claim 15, wherein the cartridge case consists of the powdered metal and/or the powdered metal alloy that is formed into the cartridge case through the injection mold processing.