The present invention generally relates to a cooling tower. More particularly, the present invention pertains to a natural draft cooling tower.
Many types of industrial facilities, such as for example, steam power plants, require condensation of the steam as integral part of the closed steam cycle. Both wet and dry type cooling towers have been used for condensing purposes. Wet cooling towers are preferred when sufficient water resources are available as wet cooling is more energy efficient than dry cooling. However, as wet cooled systems consume a considerable amount of cooling water, dry cooling systems have gained a growing market share because of their ability to save water resources. In particular, forced draught dry air-cooled condensers consisting of a multitude of fin tube heat exchangers have been known for many years. Contrary to wet cooling arrangements, which are characterized by a secondary cooling water loop, these systems are so-called “direct” dry systems where steam is directly condensed in the fin tube heat exchangers by air cooling. The fin tube heat exchangers are mounted with the tube center lines arranged in a position inclined to the vertical direction. The bundles are mounted to a support structure which enables cooling air to be conveyed through the fin tube heat exchangers by means of fans. Ambient air in contact with the fin tube heat exchangers condenses the steam inside the fin tubes, which then exits the heat exchanger as condensed sub-cooled liquid. Although being commercially successful over many years, a disadvantage of direct dry air-cooled condensers is the power required to operate the fans, as well as fan noise, which is undesirable in most situations. Currently two types of dry cooling are used, air-cooled condenser (ACC) natural draft or fan assisted, and indirect dry cooling tower (IDCT) natural draft or fan assisted.
In an indirect dry cooling system, a turbine exhaust condenser is provided, where turbine steam is condensed by means of cooling water. The cooling water is conveyed through a water duct by means of a pump to an air-cooled cooling tower. An indirect dry cooling tower consists of a multitude of air-cooled heat exchangers where the heat is conveyed to the ambient air by convection. The cooling tower may be operated with fan assistance or in natural draught. The turbine exhaust condenser may for example be a surface or a jet condenser. Because of the presence of a secondary water loop, indirect dry cooling systems are not as thermally effective as direct dry systems. Another disadvantage of natural draught indirect dry cooling systems, however, is the higher investment cost as compared to the forced draught direct air cooled condenser.
These natural draft cooling towers are generally from 100 meters to 200 meters high or more and 75 to 150 meters or more in diameter. In general, the larger the towers are, the more heat they are capable of dissipating. However, if the plant is modified to produce more energy or otherwise need more cooling capacity, it is very difficult to increase capacity to a natural draft cooling tower. Adding heat transfer media whether wet or dry may not increase cooling. By adding depth to the heat exchangers the resistance to air flow is increased. The total airflow through a natural draft tower is reduced and thermal performance may actually be diminished. More airflow may be needed to increase thermal performance.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a system and method to increase the cooling capacity of a cooling tower that is capable of overcoming the disadvantages described herein at least to some extent.
The foregoing needs are met, to a great extent, by the present invention, wherein in some respects a system and method to increase the cooling capacity of a cooling tower are provided.
An embodiment of the present invention pertains to a system for increasing a cooling capacity of a natural draft cooling tower. The system includes a shell extension and a tensioner. The shell extension is to extend a height of the cooling tower. The tensioner provides compression in the structure from the shell extension to a base of the cooling tower.
Another embodiment of the present invention relates to an apparatus for increasing a cooling capacity of a cooling tower. The apparatus includes a shell extension and a tensioner. The tensioner provides compression in the structure from the shell extension.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention pertains to a method of increasing a cooling capacity of an existing cooling tower. In this method, a shell extension is installed to extend a height of the existing cooling tower and it is determined if a wind load of the shell extension and the existing cooling tower is less than a designed wind load of the existing cooling tower.
There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, certain embodiments of the invention in order that the detailed description thereof herein may be better understood, and in order that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. There are, of course, additional embodiments of the invention that will be described below and which will form the subject matter of the claims appended hereto.
In this respect, before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of embodiments in addition to those described and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein, as well as the abstract, are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception upon which this disclosure is based may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present invention provides, in various embodiments, a system and method to increase the cooling capacity of a cooling tower suitable for use with a power generating facility. Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawing figures, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout.
The shell extension system 12 includes a shell extension 30, stiffening ring 32, tensioners 34, plinths 36, ring beam 38, and ballast 40. The shell extension 30 includes a panel or membrane 42 supported by a frame 44. The shell extension system 12 may be installed as part of a new cooling tower construction and/or on an existing cooling tower. In both installations, the shell extension system 12 increases the cooling capacity of the cooling tower 10. It is an advantage of one or more embodiments of the invention that this increased cooling capacity or increased capacity to dissipate heat may be realized without building additional cooling towers or demolishing existing towers and rebuilding them larger. It is another advantage that the shell extension system 12 described herein may be installed more quickly and efficiently than a concrete extension and a portion may be assembled on the ground to further reduce energy plant down time. In addition, the extension described herein may be less expensive to build. Furthermore, the shell extension 30 may be extremely corrosion resistant. For example, the membrane 42 may include a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), or other polymer sheet or fabric.
Natural draft (ND) cooling tower performance is influenced by the height of the tower shell 14. The cooling tower 10 and other ND towers work by creating a pressure differential of the column of air in the shell 14 versus the air stratum on the outside of the shell 14. The ambient air on the outside of the shell 14 may be thought of as a column of ambient air creating a head pressure. This column of air exerts a pressure at the air inlet around the columns 16. Ambient air entering the cooling tower 10 is heated and gains moisture as it passes through the heat exchanger (not shown). This makes the air more buoyant than the outside air. The inside air column exerts less pressure. This pressure differential causes the ambient air to move into the tower and through the heat exchanger.
More air flow results in more cooling. The airflow is roughly proportional to the square root of the pressure differential. By creating a taller tower, the column of air is also taller and the differential pressure is approximately increased linearly. Therefore, the airflow increases approximately by a factor of the square root of the ratio of the total height of the extended tower to the tower height of the original shell 14.
It is another advantage of some embodiments that a deteriorated top portion or the rim 18 of the cooling tower 10 or other existing ND tower may be replaced during installation of the shell extension system 12. In this regard, older shells 14 may have experienced significant deterioration. In some cases, the rim 18 or top of the shell 14 is significantly more deteriorated than the lower portion of the shell 14. Effluent air discharged from the cooling tower 10 is nearly all pure water vapor. Wind tends to bend the plume over the top of the cooling tower 10 and some of the vapor may condense on the outside of the shell 14—particularly at the rim 18. This condensate dries out when the plume changes direction. Thus, the outside of the shell 14 is exposed to many wet dry cycles of this condensed vapor. Vapor condensate aggressively solubilizes and leaches out constituents from the concrete which causes the concrete to weaken and crumble.
Additionally, many shells 14 flare out above the throat (minimum diameter location) as shown in
The shell extension 30 shown in
Returning to
The shell extension 30 may be anchored to the existing cooling tower 10 and/or the stiffening ring 32. The rim 18 is typically stiffened (larger section) to prevent the rim 18 from buckling under wind loads. If the rim 18 is sound, it may be used as-is to anchor the shell extension 30. Otherwise, the stiffening ring 32 may be used to replace or augment the existing rim 18.
Wind loads applied to the shell extension 30 may be mitigated via the tensioners 34. Because the shell extension 30 is generally light weight compared to an equivalent concrete shell, wind uplift is of a particular concern. Adding additional wind uplift forces without balancing with equal gravity dead loads results in net uplift forces. Two approaches can be utilized to satisfy wind forces. In new construction, reinforcing steel may be added to the shell to accommodate the additional uplift from the shell extension 30. In existing cooling towers, the tensioners 34 may be utilized to translate the uplift to the ground or to the ballast 40. The tensioners 34 include any suitable material for translating a tension load from the stiffening ring 32 to the plinths 36, ballast 40 and/or the ground. Examples of suitable materials for the tensioners 34 include: steel and other metal cables; wires; carbon fibers or other fibers braided into lines; or other such materials. The tensioners 34 may be free or retained against the shell 14 with clips or other retaining device, for example, that permit free elongation of the tensioner but provide transverse restraint to prevent the tensioner from dynamic excitation. Tension in the tensioners 34 places the shell 14 in compression. When the additional uplift forces are applied, the pre-compression of the shell 14 is relieved. No additional demands are placed on the conventional steel reinforcing in the shell 14. Also noteworthy is the fact that where the wind load places compressive loads on the shell 14, the concrete of the shell 14 will elastically shorten due to the compression. This elastic shortening reduces the tension in the tensioners 34 resulting in little or no net compression in the shell 14 for the wind load. For shell geometries with straight line generators, the tensioners 34 desirably can be placed along these lines. For each tensioner 34 placed on the outside of the shell 14, an accompanying cable may be placed on the inside as shown in
The plinths 36 support the bottoms of the columns 16 and also provide an anchor for the tensioners 34. In a particular example, the plinths 36 are reinforced concrete with inset cable anchors. The ring beam 38 facilitates distribution of loads from the plinths 36. The ballast 40 is optionally included to provide additional downward force to offset uplift. Alternatively the tensioners may be anchored to the ring beam.
The number of tensioners may be an even multiple of the plinths. The force resisted by each tensioner is the uplift force at each plinth divided by the number of tensioners per plinth. A service factor is applied to the uplift force or alternatively a load and resistance factor design (LRFD) method is applied to establish the required force capacity of the tensioner. Then a tensioner with a capacity equal to or greater than the required capacity could be selected. For example cable manufactures typically have load capacity tables for their products. The appropriate cable can be selected from the table.
To reduce applied wind forces on the cooling tower 10 and/or the shell extension system 12, a variety of steps may be taken. For example, in shells built without surface ribs or with very small surface ribs, an option is to consider making the surface more rough. Building codes for cooling towers prescribe a number of circumferential wind pressure distributions for different surface rib roughness. This may reduce the resulting forces in the shell. Also, older shells (before 1977) may have been designed with very conservative wind pressure coefficients. Applying new standards may prove the shell has capacity to accept the wind loads with the tension structure extension. In some cases it may be found that tensioners are not required to resist uplift due to reducing wind loads and/or because an overabundance of reinforcing was supplied in the original shell design.
To reduce applied wind forces, the shell extension 30 may include a wind bypass or one or more devices to vent wind. For example, retractable fabric or doors can be used to vent the frame work and reduce the wind loads. In advance of an approaching storm such as a hurricane, the shell extension 30 “skin” could be retracted or vented to reduce wind loads. Normally, natural draft towers have plenty of draft (air flow) in cool weather and the shell extension 30 may not be needed. In hot weather, many power plants experience maximum demand and the ND towers are least effective. As such, the shell extension 30 is most beneficial during hot weather. So, the shell extension 30 could be vented from fall through spring minimizing any risk to wind events during that time. The vent may be used alone or in combination with ribs or other roughness features to reduce wind loads. Furthermore, the tensioners 34 may be utilized to attach the ribs or other roughness features.
The many features and advantages of the invention are apparent from the detailed specification, and thus, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such features and advantages of the invention which fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and variations will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation illustrated and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3300942 | Horstman | Jan 1967 | A |
3385197 | Greber | May 1968 | A |
3618277 | Waters | Nov 1971 | A |
3637193 | Kugler et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3846519 | Spangemacher | Nov 1974 | A |
3944636 | Schuldenberg et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3994108 | Johnson | Nov 1976 | A |
4092811 | Lin et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4148850 | Schulte et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4261931 | Rothrock et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4267883 | Maurice et al. | May 1981 | A |
4326363 | Leonhardt et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4397793 | Stillman et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4520600 | Bordet | Jun 1985 | A |
4737321 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
5480594 | Wilkerson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
6497401 | Flaherty | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6943461 | Kaploun | Sep 2005 | B2 |
8235363 | Samyn et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140373466 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |