The present application claims priority from Spanish Utility Model No. 200801242 filed on Jun. 6, 2008, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a shelling-separating machine, especially for almonds and other soft-shelled nuts, providing essential novelty features and considerable advantages with respect to the means known and used for similar purposes in the current state of the art.
The existence of multiple nuts in which the kernel, i.e., the part which can be used for consumption, is covered with a shell with a degree of hardness which varies considerably among nuts is generally known. Even within the same nut, there are occasionally different varieties nuts in which the degree of hardness of a shell is likewise variable. Such is the case of almonds, in which the degree of hardness of the shell varies considerably from one variety to another. Therefore, the shelling process must necessarily be designed according to the structural features of the shell.
The existence of machines which have specifically been designed to automatically shell the almonds or other nuts with similar characteristics is already known on the market. For example, Spanish Utility Model number U-200601131 owned by the same applicant as the present invention and incorporated herein by reference describes a shelling-separating machine for almonds in which the shelling element consists of a rotary shaft provided with multiple filiform elements which, like fingers longitudinally provided with a certain curvature, project radially from said rotary shaft, starting from aligned positions according to different generatrices of the rotary shaft. These elements act directly on the shell of the nut and cause it to break, in order to extract the kernel through an outlet hopper provided for such purpose, and to expel the sticks and shells through an outlet mouth located at the end opposite to the product access end.
However, experience has demonstrated that in practice, soft-shelled almonds are usually mixed with a certain percentage of hard-shelled almonds, which is about 10% to 20%. These hard-shelled almonds evidently require a different treatment, as it is impossible to break their shell to extract the kernel with the use of the same machine as is used for the softer-shelled almonds.
Therefore, although the machine described in the mentioned prior utility model perfectly fulfills the mission for which it was developed, it has been verified in practice that the modification of some of the structural features for the purpose of providing continuous feed means, together with retaining the hard-shelled almonds (i.e., the non-shelled nuts) at the outlet of the machine, all of this being controlled by measuring and controlling a certain functional parameter, allows carrying out a selection of soft-shelled almonds among hard-shelled almonds, in order to extract the kernel from the first type of almonds and expel the second type of almonds, when certain levels of the control parameter are exceeded, the expelling action of which can be manually or automatically controlled.
Therefore, the objective of the present invention is to develop and construct an almond shelling machine which allows obtaining the operational and functional improvements mentioned above. This objective has been fully reached by means of the shelling machine which will be the object of the description below.
The machine of the invention has essentially started from a basic construction similar to that described in the above-mentioned prior utility model, in the sense that the machine comprises a receptacle supported by a suitable support frame intended to receive the nuts through an access mouth located at a first end of the receptacle, the latter being provided with an opening made at the bottom thereof, in a longitudinally intermediate position, for the exit of the kernel, and the receptacle further having an outlet mouth formed at the other end through which the almonds or harder-shelled nuts which have not been shelled, together with other impurities, are expelled. Inside the receptacle there is a rotary shaft, supported on end bearings, provided with radially projecting fingers to act on the almonds and drive the relative movement thereof towards the outlet mouth formed at the second end of the receptacle.
Unlike the machine of the prior document, the present invention has provided the arrangement at the inlet of the machine of a hopper equipped with a vibrating/feed metering device, which prevents the machine from being without material and the breaking of the kernel with the subsequent reduction in the quality of the latter, whereas the continuous feed provided by said device prevents at the same time the occurrence of obstructions inside the machine. In turn, the placement of a lowerable means intended to close the outlet opening has been provided at the outlet mouth of the machine of the present embodiment, such that the non-shelled product (almonds or other hard-shelled nuts) is retained for the necessary time, until the operational conditions of the machine show the need to open the retaining element to allow the exit of the retained product. As has been stated, these conditions are determined by controlling one or more functional parameters of the machine, such that the action for opening the retaining element can be carried out manually or automatically. In the embodiment of the present invention, it has been provided the retained product exits due to overflowing, once the amount of retained product exceeds a certain pre-established level, given that as hard-shelled almonds have a lower density than soft-shelled almonds, they occupy the highest positions in the stack of retained product. Despite the foregoing, although overflowing is preferred as the expelling means for the hard-shelled almonds in the chosen embodiment, it must be understood that in the state of the art there are many other options which would be perfectly applicable to the improved machine of the present invention for the purpose of recovering the almonds or other harder-shelled nuts which may not have shelled during their passage through the machine.
As a constructive detail associated to the improvements proposed by the present invention, it has been provided that the motor in charge of transmitting the driving action on the rotary shaft inside the receptacle of the machine is preferably located in a position outside the frame, far from the lower outlet of the receptacle through which the shelled kernel falls, thus providing it with a greater protection against the dust which inevitably accompanies the kernel. Additionally, and independently, of the position chosen for said motor, the machine can incorporate aspiration means which aspirate and collect a high percentage of the dust generated during the treatment of the nuts inside the receptacle of the machine, for the purpose of preventing the dust generated from being accumulated in the motor or any other member of the machine.
The motor transmitting the driving effect to the rotary shaft is preferably controlled electronically, such that its speed is variable through a wide range of value, for the purpose of adapting the speed of the rotary shaft (and therefore the action of the fingers on the nuts) to the process conditions, either during the filling (feed of the product towards the receptacle) or to adapt the speed according to the type or the variety of nuts which are being shelled.
As it will be understood, with a shelling-separating machine including the constructive improvements mentioned above, a much more complete treatment of soft-shelled almonds is achieved, while at the same time a much more profitable result is ensured due to considerable reduction in the percentage of non-shelled almonds with respect to that which was generated with prior machines, with the subsequent production increase. The form of control of the shelling provided does not affect the kernel, and a substantial improvement over the entire process is therefore obtained.
These and other features and advantages of the invention will be more clearly shown from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment, given only by way of a non-limiting illustration together with the attached drawings, in which:
The present invention proposes the development and construction of a machine applicable to the operation of shelling nuts of the type of those including a soft (and where appropriate semi-soft) outer enveloping shell, such as almonds, peanuts and other nuts the shell of which has hardness, flexibility and tenacity properties similar to those of the specifically mentioned nuts, which machine has been designed as a substantial improvement of the already existing models as it incorporates operational and functional features which allow ensuring the obtaining of the kernel in optimal conditions, while at the same time it allows an effective separation of the almonds and other hard-shelled nuts which may possibly accompany the soft-shelled nuts. The machine of the invention provides, on one hand, the incorporation at the inlet end of the machine of means for continuously feeding the product for the purpose of eliminating obstructions inside such machine and, on the other hand, at the outlet end of the machine, retaining means which can be manually or automatically actuated, which means keep the outlet closed in order to retain the non-shelled product until the operational conditions recommend the actuation and opening of such retaining means to allow the non-shelled product to exit the machine, preferably by the overflow with respect to a previously established level.
As has been mentioned above, the detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the machine of the invention will be made below with the aid of the attached drawings, through which the same reference numbers are used to designate identical or similar parts. Thus, considering first
Now considering the representation of
With a machine embodiment such as that which has just been described, both the operation of the machine and the improvements provided by the invention with respect to other conventional machines can be easily understood. The product is introduced through the hopper 9, with the aid of the vibrating and metering device 10, towards the receptacle 2, where it is subjected to the shelling action provided by the fingers of the shaft 4. The feed of a sufficient amount of product makes this action effective, as it is basically the consequence of the friction between the fingers and the almonds inside the receptacle. The almonds which are not shelled, together with other impurities, are thrust towards the end of the receptacle opposite to the inlet end, where they have no chance of exiting because the retaining element 13 is lowered, i.e., closing the outlet passage, and they are therefore retained against such element. When it is considered that there is retention above a predetermined threshold, which circumstance depends on the parameters measured by the devices 11 and/or 12, the opening of the retaining element 13a is caused, allowing the product which was retained up to that time to exit. As has been stated, this product basically consists of the hard-shelled almonds which were accumulated during the development of the process and which correspond to a percentage of almonds which normally accompanies the soft-shelled almonds, mixed with the hard-shelled almonds, and which as result of its lower density, occupies higher positions in the stack of the product; in the embodiment which has been shown, the fall occurs due to the overflowing of the amount of almonds which has been located above the edge determined by line 14, these almonds being suitably collected for their subsequent treatment in another suitable machine.
In the description which has just been made, it has been considered that the soft-shelled almonds are mixed with a percentage amount of hard-shelled almonds as this is the normal situation occurring in practice. However, the persons skilled in the art will understand that the improvements provided by the modified machine of the present invention can also be reached even in the case in which there are no hard-shelled almonds mixed with the soft-shelled almonds, but rather the entire treated product is of the latter type. Indeed, due to the fact that, as has been stated above, the shelling occurs by the friction between the fingers (not visible in the figure) carried by the rotary shaft 4 and nuts fed into the receptacle 2, it will be understood that this action is optimized when a minimum product filling level has been reached inside said receptacle 2, which is obtained as a result of the feed controlled through the vibrating/metering device 10 incorporated at the inlet of the receptacle. This action is independent of the existence or non-existence of hard-shelled almonds or other nuts retained at the outlet, because as has been stated, the optimal performance is achieved when a minimum filling level is reached; it is deduced therefrom that although all the almonds are soft-shelled almonds, the results are likewise improved provided that this minimum filling level is maintained approximately constant.
Continuing with the description of the operational development of the treatment process, as the non-shelled product is allowed to exit receptacle 2 by lifting the retaining element 13, the variation in the measured parameters determines that the closure of said retainer 13 is carried out again, the cycle continuing in the same manner.
The parameter used to determine the action of the retaining element 13 is preferably the driving torque associated with the motor device 5, which is variable depending on the higher or lower resistance found by the rotary shaft 4 during the operational cycle, but this feature must not be considered as limiting, since any other parameter which can provide information on the operational and functional states of the machine could be chosen. In this sense, other parameters such as power consumption, the product level detected by means of a suitable probe, the speed of the rotary shaft, or even the offset measured in the amount of inlet and outlet product could be mentioned.
In addition, as has been mentioned above, the lowering of the retaining element 13 of the present embodiment with respect to its hinged joint 13a in relation to the receptacle 2 can be carried out manually by the operator in charge of the machine, or it can be carried out in an automated manner, commanded by the control devices, with the use of any means known in the art and which are suitable for this specific function, depending on the measured values of the parameter considered.
Finally, it will be observed that the motor 5 is positioned outside of the frame 1 for supporting the machine. This feature must only be understood as optional and is due to the convenience of separating the motor 5 from the outlet of the hopper 8 because, as has been stated, the shelled kernel exiting through said hopper 8 is accompanied by a certain amount of dust which reaches the position of the motor 5, is accumulated thereon, increases the maintenance needs and reduces its operational life. Therefore, it is considered necessary to locate it in a position farther from the outlet of the hopper 8, and therefore less within the reach of the dust which is produced during the shelling and exiting to the outside together with the kernel. Alternatively, the machine can include a conventional type of aspirating device (not shown) which allows suitably aspirating the dust which is produced during the operations for treating the nuts inside the receptacle 2, regardless of the fact that the motor is located outside the frame as has been shown in
As a summary of the above, it will be understood that the described machine provides a set of advantages with respect to currently existing machines, because the feed through the hopper and the metering device is more safe and effective as, on one hand, it prevents the machine from being without material and, consequently, the breaking of the kernel, with the subsequent reduction in the quality thereof, and, on the other hand, it provides a continuous controlled feed which keeps a filling level constant, preventing the occurrence of obstructions and allowing reaching an optimal performance of the machine; the placement of a retaining element at the outlet end improves the percentage of non-shelled almonds which occurred with the production increase, and finally, the arrangement of the motor outside the frame, in the case of the preferred embodiment of the invention, reduces the need and frequency of maintenance operations, with the subsequent saving of time and costs. All this, together with the capacity for the automated control of its operation, makes the described machine have optimal operational and functional features for the function for which it is intended.
It is not considered necessary to extend the content of the present description so that a person skilled in the art can understand its scope and the advantages derived therefrom, as well as carry out the practical embodiment of its object.
Despite the foregoing and given that the description made corresponds only to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood that multiple, likewise protected variations and modifications of detail could be introduced within its essence, which could affect features such as the shape, the size or the construction materials of the assembly or of the parts integrating it.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200801242 | Jun 2008 | ES | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
397863 | Kuhlmann | Feb 1889 | A |
567372 | Beach | Sep 1896 | A |
611765 | Beach | Oct 1898 | A |
644485 | Woodson | Feb 1900 | A |
659801 | Read | Oct 1900 | A |
879696 | Trevor | Feb 1908 | A |
928958 | Gilson | Jul 1909 | A |
1062742 | Siebert et al. | May 1913 | A |
1073165 | Paul | Sep 1913 | A |
1133121 | Gebhardt | Mar 1915 | A |
1230001 | Martenette | Jun 1917 | A |
1231002 | Dawson | Jun 1917 | A |
1238238 | Williams | Aug 1917 | A |
1272803 | Hayes et al. | Jul 1918 | A |
1322300 | Gooding et al. | Nov 1919 | A |
1342692 | Pape | Jun 1920 | A |
1350506 | Kennedy | Aug 1920 | A |
1364083 | Demerath | Jan 1921 | A |
1380023 | Roussillon | May 1921 | A |
1380859 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Jun 1921 | A |
1411177 | Mitchell | Mar 1922 | A |
1417272 | Maness | May 1922 | A |
1418840 | Smith et al. | Jun 1922 | A |
1478869 | Cooper | Dec 1923 | A |
1501259 | Woodson | Jul 1924 | A |
1574450 | Skinner et al. | Feb 1926 | A |
1594702 | Williams | Aug 1926 | A |
1598053 | Coari | Aug 1926 | A |
1598076 | Galleazzi | Aug 1926 | A |
1606226 | Hopkins et al. | Nov 1926 | A |
1663980 | Giesecke | Mar 1928 | A |
1672443 | Williams | Jun 1928 | A |
1761823 | Gebhardt | Jun 1930 | A |
1767917 | Demek | Jun 1930 | A |
1785328 | Repp | Dec 1930 | A |
1795476 | Coari | Mar 1931 | A |
1802294 | Walker | Apr 1931 | A |
1808104 | Gebhardt | Jun 1931 | A |
1834347 | Nixon | Dec 1931 | A |
1860746 | MacDougall | May 1932 | A |
1935385 | Biggs | Nov 1933 | A |
1994906 | Burgin | Mar 1935 | A |
2175425 | Berneike | Oct 1939 | A |
2248327 | Bainer et al. | Jul 1941 | A |
2248365 | Leonard et al. | Jul 1941 | A |
2248368 | Low | Jul 1941 | A |
2259939 | Garcia | Oct 1941 | A |
2265588 | Walker | Dec 1941 | A |
2279987 | Guerra | Apr 1942 | A |
2296088 | Carter | Sep 1942 | A |
2307656 | Abbott | Jan 1943 | A |
2319757 | Vigneau | May 1943 | A |
2321795 | Buckman | Jun 1943 | A |
2381288 | Jones | Aug 1945 | A |
2408510 | Feldmann | Oct 1946 | A |
2424022 | Deutsch | Jul 1947 | A |
2454660 | Leonard | Nov 1948 | A |
2504374 | Baldwin | Apr 1950 | A |
2506848 | Turner | May 1950 | A |
2669268 | Meyer | Feb 1954 | A |
2685312 | Mulvany et al. | Aug 1954 | A |
2747635 | Kofoid | May 1956 | A |
2755834 | Mulvany | Jul 1956 | A |
2762410 | Stahl | Sep 1956 | A |
2771927 | Thaning | Nov 1956 | A |
2806501 | Van Dijk | Sep 1957 | A |
3276495 | Calfee | Oct 1966 | A |
4144805 | Cacho | Mar 1979 | A |
4358467 | Patel | Nov 1982 | A |
4504505 | Rodriguez et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4537122 | George | Aug 1985 | A |
4742686 | Cook | May 1988 | A |
4773323 | Frasch et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5467700 | Dowell et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5505123 | Kim | Apr 1996 | A |
5721002 | Whaling | Feb 1998 | A |
6098530 | Hemry | Aug 2000 | A |
6135020 | Broyles | Oct 2000 | A |
6209448 | Hagen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6270824 | Quantz | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6382427 | Nakhei-Nejad | May 2002 | B1 |
6397737 | Eisel | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6516714 | Warmack et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6541057 | McSwain | Apr 2003 | B1 |
8273396 | Shepard et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1062979 | Aug 2006 | ES |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090301320 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |