The present invention generally relates to collapsible shelters and, more particularly, to a collapsible shelter having collapsible eaves and to shelters that are compact when in the collapsed state.
Portable, free standing, shelters that have a collapsible frame structure that supports a canopy are well known. Portable shelters typically employ a cloth or plastic canopy attached to a light-weight, highly foldable skeleton or frame structure. The canopy provides a roof and/or walls for the shelter, and the frame structure provides support for the canopy, for example, the frame structure includes legs to elevate the roof and a system of trusses to support the roof and to generally stabilize the shelter. The frame structure often incorporates a compound, scissor-like, arrangement of a light-weight, tubular material such as aluminum. In order to maximize the usable area under a shelter, the frame structure is often designed so that the roof is supported solely by legs positioned near the perimeter of the roof. Stated alternatively, shelters do not typically employ an interior supporting post or leg such as a leg or post positioned in the center of shelter. An example of such a portable shelter is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 4,641,676 to Lynch the contents of which are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference.
To further maximize the usable area under the canopy, several portable shelter designs have incorporated eaves or awning-like structures that support the canopy beyond the exterior boundary or envelope defined by the legs of the shelter's frame. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,718,995 to Dotterweich describes a portable shelter having a canopy extension that extends out from one side of the shelter. The extension is supported by a relatively complex secondary network of trusses and cross-supports independent from that of the main body of the shelter. This single canopy extension design has the disadvantage of increasing the weight and size of the collapsed shelter, decreasing the effective height of the shelter along the outer boundary of the canopy extension, and being susceptible to deformation and damage from environmental forces, such as wind, due to the relatively large, unsupported extension.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,367,348 to Tsai et al., the contents of which are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference, describes a portable shelter having a canopy extension extending from four sides of the shelter. The canopy extension is supported by the end portions of certain of the trusses that support the canopy roof. The end portions supporting the canopy extension are entirely unsupported by secondary trusses or struts. This canopy extension design is also relatively susceptible to deformation and damage from environmental forces, such as wind, due to the unsupported nature of the canopy extension.
U.S. Publication No. 2007/0186967 to Zingerle, the contents of which are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference, describes a canopy extension that is supported by primary struts extending from the exterior corner of each support post. The primary strut is supported by one or more support strut that span between the primary strut and a network of side trusses. This canopy extension design has the disadvantage that a relatively large angle is formed between the support strut and the network of side trusses which, in turn, results in less fluid movement of the shelter frame when expanding and collapsing the shelter and increases the likelihood that the support strut will bind and/or kink. Furthermore, the fact that the primary struts extend from the corners of the support posts undesirably increases the collapsed size of the shelter.
Chinese Patent Application No. 2009201183292 to Kuanjun, the contents of which are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference, describes a canopy extension that is supported by primary struts extending from the exterior corners of each support post. The primary struts are supported by a support strut that is attached to the primary strut at one end and slidibly attached to the exterior corner of the support post at an opposite end. This canopy extension design has the disadvantages that the strut support is not limited in its upward movement on the support post. In the event that an environmental force, such as wind, acts against the support strut, the support strut will be prone to upward movement which, in turn, causes deformation and damage to the canopy extension and frame generally. Furthermore, the fact that the primary struts and support struts extend from the corners of the support posts undesirably increases the collapsed size of the shelter.
What is needed in the art is a shelter design that maximizes the area shaded and protected by the deployed shelter and that does so without sacrificing the stability and strength of the shelter, complicating the operation of the shelter, or increasing the weight, collapsed size or storability, or cost of the shelter.
In light of deficiencies of prior art collapsible shelters, the present invention provides a collapsible shelter that includes a slider and strut mechanism mounted on support posts of the shelter that automatically actuate and extend from the corners of the shelter when the shelter is expanded from its collapsed state. The strut mechanism provides support for an eave that extends outside all or a portion of the perimeter of the shelter defined by the corners of the support posts. In this manner the protected and shaded area offered by the shelter is greatly increased without sacrificing the stability and strength of the shelter, complicating the operation of the shelter, or increasing the weight, storability or cost of the shelter.
The present invention also provides an automatic hard-stop mechanism that prevents the eave slider and strut mechanism from becoming over-extended during improper operation of the shelter or during harsh environmental conditions such as high winds.
The present invention also provides shelter support posts that are configured and oriented in a manner that minimizes the footprint of the increased awning shelter when in the collapsed state. In a preferred embodiment, the support posts are configured to be oriented at a 45 degree angle so that the eave slider and strut mechanism can be attached to the support posts without increasing the footprint, or envelope, of the shelter when in the collapsed state.
These and other aspects, features and advantages of which embodiments of the invention are capable of will be apparent and elucidated from the following description of embodiments of the present invention, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, in which
Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. The terminology used in the detailed description of the embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings is not intended to be limiting of the invention. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements.
With reference to
The side trusses 16 employ a scissor-like assembly spanning between posts 12. The side trusses 16 have an upper arm 24 and a lower arm 26 that cross one another and attached to one another at a side truss hinge 28.
As best shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
With reference to
While
In a preferred embodiment, instead of one longitudinal element, the strut support 38 comprises two longitudinal elements. The proximal ends 40 of the two longitudinal elements of the strut supports 38 pass by each of the two intermediary sides 70 of the post 12 and attach to the eave slider 48 on the interior side 66 of the post 12, as shown in
This configuration provides at least two advantages to the frame 10. First, by positioning the pivot point for the proximal end 40 of the strut supports 38 on the interior side of the post 12, a sharper angle is formed at the point where the strut supports 38 attach to the eave strut 32. This, in turn provides for smoother operation, i.e. smoother expanding and collapsing of the eave assemblies 30 and the frame 10. Second, employing two longitudinal elements of the strut support 38 increases strength of the eave assemblies 30 and, more particularly, aids in preventing the eave assemblies from moving laterally. This advantage is further enhanced by the increased rigidity provided by passing the longitudinal elements of the strut support 38 on each side of the post 12. The post 12 serving as a lateral truss between the two longitudinal elements.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the corner assembly 14 and hence the frame 10, is further improved by employing an eave stop 62. With reference to
The eave stop 62 is particularly advantageous in that the eave stop 62 assists in securing the eave slider 48 in the desired position on the post 12. In operation, when the frame 10 is transitioned from a collapsed state to an expanded, deployed state, the lower coupling 46 is urged upward towards the upper portion 45 of the post 12 causing expansion of the truss network comprising the peak trusses 18 and side trusses 16. The lower coupling 46 contacts the eave slider 48 and urges the eaves slider 48 upward along the post 12. As the eave slider 48 moves upward along the post 12, the eave slider 48 causes the eave strut 32 to pivot outward away from the exterior side 68 of the post 12, thereby providing support for a canopy eave, not shown, that is configured to extend beyond the perimeter of the posts 12 of the frame 10. The lower coupling lock 64 eventually locks into place on the post 12 when the frame 10 is in the fully expanded, deployed state.
In harsh environmental conditions such as high winds, there is a risk that the canopy of the shelter is caught by the wind and is caused move or deform the frame 10 that supports the canopy. This is especially problematic due to cantilever-like configuration of the eave assemblies 30. In order to prevent the eave assemblies 30 from being forced upward in such a circumstance, the eave stop 62 is disposed on the post 12. In the event the wind on the canopy urges the eave assembly 30 in the upwards direction, an upper surface of the eave slider 48 contacts the eave stop 62. The eave stop 62 thereby prevents the upward movement or the eave slider 48 and, hence, the deformation of the eave assembly 30.
Of particular importance to certain embodiments of the present invention is the orientation of the rectangular posts 12 relative to the other components of the frame 10. As best shown in
By way of comparison, as shown in
The orientation of the posts 12 relative to the envelope 84 and other components of the frame 10 of the shelter of the present invention provides distinct advantages over the prior art shelters. For example, the rotation of the posts of the frame 10 of the present invention results in a space occurring between the exterior side 68 of the post 12 and the corner of the shelter envelope when the frame 10 is in the collapsed state. Within this space, the eave strut 32 and strut support 38 of the eave assembly 30 are disposed, when the frame 10 is in the collapsed state. As a result, a collapsible shelter having an eave feature according to the present invention can be collapsed into substantially the same envelope as that of a shelter that does not provide an eave. Further advantages are provided by the orientation of the post 12 of the frame 10 by imparting increased resistance to lateral forces, such as wind, to the frame 10.
One of skill in the art will understand that the frame structure 10 of the present invention may be constructed from a variety of materials known in the art to facilitate light-weight designs and foldability. For example, the posts 12, the peak trusses 18, the peak truss supports 19, the side trusses 16, the eave struts 32, and the strut supports 38 may be formed of an alloy including, but not limited to, tubular and/or solid aluminum. The upper coupling 44, the lower coupling 46, the eave slider 48, the peak junction 20, the side truss hinges 28, and other similar components may be formed of, for example, a solid alloy or a molded plastic.
Although a particular embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, various changes may be made in the form, composition, construction and arrangement of the parts herein without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the examples discussed above should be taken as being illustrative and not limiting in any sense.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/092,765 filed Apr. 22, 2011 entitled Shelter With Extended Eaves, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/326,997, filed Apr. 22, 2010, entitled Shelter With Extended Eaves, the contents of both of which are incorporated in their entireties herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
595875 | Ernest | Dec 1897 | A |
2197791 | Eddy | Aug 1936 | A |
2182283 | Curtis | Sep 1939 | A |
2555220 | Brown | May 1951 | A |
2962034 | Finlayson | Nov 1960 | A |
3621857 | May et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3730196 | Borskey | May 1973 | A |
3874398 | Hendrickson | Apr 1975 | A |
D246141 | Mazur | Oct 1977 | S |
4630627 | Windows et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641676 | Lynch | Feb 1987 | A |
4779635 | Lynch | Oct 1988 | A |
5024409 | Bohnen | Jun 1991 | A |
5035253 | Bortles | Jul 1991 | A |
5335685 | Dahulich | Aug 1994 | A |
6431193 | Carter | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6718995 | Dotterweich | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6848461 | Tsai | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6874520 | Carter | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6929017 | Byun | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7025075 | Suh | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7299812 | Carter | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7367348 | Tsai et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7775229 | Sy-Facunda | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7849868 | Carter | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20020074031 | Morgante et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020092555 | Chen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020108647 | Chen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040020526 | Deng | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20070051397 | Choi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070186967 | Zingerle | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070221262 | Tsai et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20100043856 | Park et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100051078 | Sy-Facunda | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110061702 | Lin | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201531150 | Jul 2010 | CN |
201695750 | Jan 2011 | CN |
201695751 | Jan 2011 | CN |
Entry |
---|
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,728, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,728, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 22, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,765, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 10, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,765, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/704,405, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Mar. 8, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,728, 11 pages. |
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 13, 2011 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/033627, 8 pages. |
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 13, 2011 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/033627, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140102497 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61326997 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13092765 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 14132385 | US |