Shielding is used in a variety of cables to reduce electrical interference that could affect a signal travelling through the cable. The shielding also helps to prevent the signal from radiating from the cable and interfering with other devices. One such type of shielding includes either one or two layers of aluminum or other shielding material (such as silver, copper, or Mu-metal) wherein each shielding layer is laminated onto (and if there is more than one shielding layer, each shielding layer is separated by) a separating layer, such as a plastic, e.g., polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”) or a polyolefin such as polypropylene (“PP”). This type of shielding that combines layers of shielding material and separating layers is often referred to as either “foil,” “laminated tape,” “shielding tape,” “shielding laminate tape,” and combinations or variations thereof.
In some cables, such as coaxial cables, multiple layers of shielding tape (each of which has either one shielding layer or two shielding layers) are employed in the cable. For example, “tri-shield” cable includes an inner foil surrounded by a braid, which is in turn surrounded by an outer foil. “Quad-shield” cable includes an inner foil surrounded by an inner braid, which is in turn surrounded by an outer foil, in turn surrounded by an outer braid.
Multiple layers of shielding tape, while providing better shielding performance, also add to the cost and complexity of producing the cabling. Conventional shielding tape, with only one or two shielding layers, is susceptible to allowing RF signal egress or ingress as micro-cracks form in the shielding layers and align with each other as a result of flexing the cable. Furthermore, the outer shielding structures (such as tape) of conventional cables must often be removed in order to attach a connector. These outer shielding structures may also separate and interfere with the attachment of a connector to the cable.
The present invention overcomes these and other problems associated with conventional shielding tape and cable designs. In particular, by using shielding tape of the present invention (that incorporates three or more shielding layers) as the inner foil of a cable, outer shielding structures (such as shielding tape and/or braids) can be eliminated. This not only reduces the cost of the cable, but obviates the need for these outer shielding structures to be removed to attach a connector to the cable. Likewise, by including additional shielding layers to the inner shielding tape, the present invention eliminates the potential problem of the outer shielding structures separating and interfering with connector attachment. Furthermore, the use of three or more shielding layers in the shielding tape of the present invention improves the flex life of the shield tape by covering micro-cracks in the metal layers with additional shielding layers, thus reducing signal egress or ingress.
A coaxial cable of the present invention comprises a center conductor, a dielectric surrounding the center conductor, a shielding tape surrounding the dielectric, a braided metal surrounding the shielding tape, and an outer jacket surrounding the braided metal. The shielding tape comprises: (i) a first shielding layer bonded to a first separating layer; (ii) a second shielding layer bonded to the first separating layer and a second separating layer; and (iii) a third shielding layer bonded to the second separating layer. The present invention eliminates the potential problem of the outer shielding structures separating and interfering with connector attachment. Furthermore, the use of three or more shielding layers in the shielding tape of the present invention improves the flex life of the shield tape by covering micro-cracks in the metal layers with additional shielding layers, thus reducing signal egress or ingress. Accordingly, the present invention provides cost savings and/or an improvement in shielding performance.
A cable according to another aspect of the present invention includes a center conductor and a shielding tape surrounding the center conductor. The shielding tape comprises (i) a first shielding layer bonded to a first separating layer; (ii) a second shielding layer bonded to the first separating layer and a second separating layer; and (iii) a third shielding layer bonded to the second separating layer.
A shielding tape according to another aspect of the present invention comprises a first shielding layer bonded to a first separating layer, a second shielding layer bonded to the first separating layer and a second separating layer, and a third shielding layer bonded to the second separating layer.
Turning now to the drawings, where the purpose is to describe preferred embodiments of the invention and not limit same,
Shielding tape 10 according to the present invention comprises at least three layers of shielding material (which are also called “shielding layers”). As shown in
The aluminum layers of the exemplary shielding tape 10 are each about 9 microns thick, while the separating layers are about 12 microns thick. There is also a layer of adhesive between each aluminum/PET layer of about 2 microns thick. The adhesive layer 70 is about 25 microns thick. Other embodiments of the present invention may include shielding layers of at least 3 microns thick, separating layers of at least 4 microns thick, and adhesive layers of at least 8 microns thick. Multiple shielding layers need not all be of the same thickness. Likewise, multiple separating layers and/or adhesive layers need not all have the same thickness.
The layers of shielding material may comprise any suitable material, such as aluminum, copper, silver, a magnetic alloy (such as Mu-metal), or combinations thereof, and need not each be formed from the same material(s). The shielding layers may be any suitable thickness, and need not each be the same thickness. Additionally, while the exemplary shielding tape depicted in
The separator layers are preferably plastic and may comprise any suitable material, such as polyester, polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”), a polyolefin (such as polypropylene), or combinations thereof, and need not each be formed from the same material(s). The separator layers may be any suitable thickness, and need not each be the same thickness. Additionally, while the exemplary shielding tape depicted in
The additional thickness of the shielding tape of the present invention can be accommodated by, for example, reducing slightly the diameter of the foam dielectric 120 to which it is applied. This allows the diameter of the cable 100 to remain the same as conventional cables, yet the slight reduction in the diameter of the dielectric does not substantially degrade the performance of the cable.
Because of the improved inner layer shielding, a bi-shield coaxial cable using the preferred shielding tape of the present invention (which has three shielding layers) can perform as well as some conventional tri-shield cables without the use of an outer shielding tape. This lowers the cost and complexity of manufacturing the cable. Additionally, connector attachment is easier since an outer shielding layer would normally need to be removed to install a connector. Likewise, a tri-shield coaxial cable using the preferred shielding tape of the present invention (which has three shielding layers) can perform as well as some quad-shield cables without the use of an outer shielding braid. Accordingly, the present invention provides cost savings (e.g., when a bi-shield cable of the present invention is used instead of a conventional tri-shield cable) and/or an improvement in shielding performance (e.g., when a tri-shield cable of the present invention is used instead of a conventional tri-shield cable).
The shielding tape of the present invention also provides additional resistance to performance degradation due to wear. Upon repeated flexing of conventional cables, the shielding material (which is preferably aluminum) in each shielding layer can develop micro-cracks. These degrade shielding performance because the cracks in one shielding layer may align with the cracks in the other shielding layer, and RF can then egress or ingress through the cracks in each respective layer. The present invention reduces the effects of such cracks because cracks in each of the three layers are less likely to be aligned to provide a path for R.F. egress or ingress as compared to shielding tape with only one or two shielding layers. This is illustrated in
The exemplary bi-shield coaxial cable 100 in
Cables employing shielding tape of the present invention may also include additional layers of shielding tape and/or braid. For example, as shown in
A shielding tape of the present invention may be used in conjunction with any other type of shielded cable, such as shielded twisted-pair (“STP”) cabling. In an STP cable, for example, the shielding tape of the present invention may be used to surround each pair of one or more pairs of conductors twisted together. As shown in
An exemplary process for manufacturing a shielding tape in accordance with the present invention is depicted in
Referring again to
In step (2), the AP sheet and an A sheet are fed from rolls into the laminator. Once again, corona treatment may be used to activate the P surface prior to applying a thin layer of liquid adhesive. After lamination and oven curing the APA laminate is rolled up for the next operation.
In step (3), the sheet of AP manufactured in step 1 is combined with a sheet of APA manufactured in step 2 using lamination resulting in an APAPA layer, which is rolled up. This laminate with 3 metal shielding layers can be slit and used as is if no hot melt adhesive layer is needed.
In step (4), the sheet of APAPA manufactured in step 3 is combined with a sheet of E using the laminator. The E surface may be activated using corona treatment to improve adhesive bonding. After lamination and oven curing the APAPAE laminate is rolled up for slitting.
In step (5), the sheet of APAPA or APAPAE is slit into multiple tapes to the final width and then rolled up for use in cable manufacture.
As mentioned previously, the laminate shielding tape of the present invention provides better shielding effectiveness than cables with conventional tape, even after repeated flexing of the cable. This effectiveness is illustrated in the graph in
Having thus described preferred embodiments of the invention, other variations and embodiments that do not depart from the spirit of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art. The scope of the present invention is thus not limited to any particular embodiment, but is instead set forth in the appended claims and the legal equivalents thereof. Unless expressly stated in the written description or claims, the steps of any method recited in the claims may be performed in any order capable of yielding the desired result.
The present application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/644,477, filed Jul. 7, 2017, titled “Shielding Tape With Multiple Foil Layers,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/605,908, filed Oct. 26, 2009, titled “Shielding tape With Multiple Foil Layers,” which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/226,250 filed Jul. 16, 2009, titled “Shielding Tape With Multiple Foil Layers,” the disclosures of which are fully incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2178365 | Brobst | Oct 1939 | A |
2232846 | Freydberg | Feb 1941 | A |
2669695 | Bird | Feb 1954 | A |
2769148 | Clogston | Oct 1956 | A |
3076235 | Rollins | Feb 1963 | A |
3229623 | Rubenstein | Jan 1966 | A |
3379824 | Kempf | Apr 1968 | A |
3588317 | Hutchins, Jr. | Jun 1971 | A |
3662090 | Grey | May 1972 | A |
4029006 | Mercer | Jun 1977 | A |
4092452 | Hori | May 1978 | A |
4096346 | Stine | Jun 1978 | A |
4100003 | Trusch | Jul 1978 | A |
4117260 | Wilkenloh | Sep 1978 | A |
4125739 | Bow | Nov 1978 | A |
4221926 | Schneider | Sep 1980 | A |
4340771 | Watts | Jul 1982 | A |
4371742 | Manly | Feb 1983 | A |
4484023 | Gindrup | Jan 1984 | A |
4439632 | Aloisio | Mar 1984 | A |
4465717 | Crofts | Aug 1984 | A |
4472595 | Fox | Sep 1984 | A |
4477693 | Krabec | Oct 1984 | A |
4487996 | Rabinowitz et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4515992 | Gupta | May 1985 | A |
4557560 | Bohannon, Jr. | Dec 1985 | A |
4564723 | Lang | Jan 1986 | A |
4569704 | Bohannon, Jr. | Feb 1986 | A |
4595431 | Bohannon, Jr. | Jun 1986 | A |
4641110 | Smith | Feb 1987 | A |
4642417 | Ruthrof | Feb 1987 | A |
4691081 | gupta | Sep 1987 | A |
4694122 | Visser | Sep 1987 | A |
4729629 | Saito | Mar 1988 | A |
4760362 | Maki | Jul 1988 | A |
4774148 | Goto | Sep 1988 | A |
4894488 | Gupta | Jan 1990 | A |
4965412 | Lai | Oct 1990 | A |
4997994 | Andrews | Mar 1991 | A |
5043538 | Hughey, Jr. | Aug 1991 | A |
5043539 | Connole | Aug 1991 | A |
5049721 | Parnas | Sep 1991 | A |
5132491 | Mulrooney | Jul 1992 | A |
5146391 | MacFarlane | Sep 1992 | A |
5194291 | D'Aoust | Mar 1993 | A |
5216202 | Yoshida | Jun 1993 | A |
5298682 | Saiz | Mar 1994 | A |
5329064 | Tash | Jul 1994 | A |
5355720 | Bailey | Oct 1994 | A |
5412856 | Nazerian | May 1995 | A |
5414213 | Hillburn | May 1995 | A |
5444466 | Smyczek | Aug 1995 | A |
5471144 | Meyer | Nov 1995 | A |
5493070 | Habu | Feb 1996 | A |
5515848 | Corbett, III | May 1996 | A |
5521331 | Hillburn | May 1996 | A |
5538586 | Swanson | Jul 1996 | A |
5560536 | Moe et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5695431 | Bond et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707465 | Bibber | Jan 1998 | A |
5719353 | Carlson | Feb 1998 | A |
5770988 | Goto et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796042 | Pope | Aug 1998 | A |
5912433 | Pulido | Jun 1999 | A |
5926949 | Moe et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5945632 | Butera | Aug 1999 | A |
5949018 | Esker | Sep 1999 | A |
5959245 | Moe et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969295 | Boucino | Oct 1999 | A |
5969456 | Okamoto | Oct 1999 | A |
6037545 | Fox | Mar 2000 | A |
6052043 | Gotoh et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6087017 | Bibber | Jul 2000 | A |
6127441 | Sakamoto | Oct 2000 | A |
6137058 | Moe et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148130 | Lee | Nov 2000 | A |
6201189 | Carlson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201190 | Pope | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204445 | Gialenios | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218017 | Yamashita | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246006 | Hardin | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265667 | Stipes | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282778 | Fox | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6284374 | Yamazaki | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288628 | Fujimori | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6326551 | Adams | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6371585 | Kurachi | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6372990 | Saito | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384337 | Drum | May 2002 | B1 |
6417454 | Biebuyck | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6462436 | Kay | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6498301 | Pieper | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6545222 | Yokokawa | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6583361 | Clouet | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6596393 | Houston | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610931 | Perelman | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6734364 | Price | May 2004 | B2 |
6770819 | Patel | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800809 | Moe et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6800811 | Boucino | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6817272 | Holland | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6818832 | Hopkinson | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846536 | Priesnitz | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6848939 | Stirling | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858805 | Blew | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6875928 | Hayes | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6915564 | Adams | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6997999 | Houston | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022918 | Gialenios | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7052283 | Pixley | May 2006 | B2 |
7084343 | Visser | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7127806 | Nelson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7157645 | Huffman | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7210940 | Bailey | May 2007 | B2 |
7228625 | Zerebilov | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7299550 | Montena | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7314998 | Amato | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7468489 | Alrutz | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7497002 | Chawgo | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7507117 | Amidon | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7566236 | Malloy | Jul 2009 | B2 |
9728304 | Visser | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10068686 | Kumada | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10424423 | Visser | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10510469 | Kumada | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10573980 | Mathews | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10826108 | Wensley | Nov 2020 | B2 |
20010040042 | Stipes | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020046849 | Rapp | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020053446 | Moe et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030044606 | Iskander | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030150633 | Hirakawa | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040007308 | Houston | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040085183 | Ha | May 2004 | A1 |
20040222009 | Blew | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050042960 | Yeh | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060034638 | Kamijo | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048963 | Nishinaka | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070037419 | Sparrowhawk | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070291462 | Peng | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080314636 | Ogura | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090008142 | Shimizu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020712 | Matsumoto | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090126984 | Saneto | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133922 | Okazaki | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151998 | Fujiwara | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090283296 | Shimosawa | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100276176 | Amato | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110011638 | Gemme | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110011639 | Visser | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120255761 | Shanai | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120312592 | Matano | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130037304 | Ikeda | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130248232 | Chang | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140218642 | Iwami | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150034360 | Muto | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053950 | Suematsu | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150068907 | Fujikawa | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150250078 | Matsuda | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160037632 | Murakawa | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20190013559 | Suenaga | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190013560 | Suenaga | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190191601 | Suenaga | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190348196 | Hornung | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200234855 | Sagawa | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10050445 | Apr 2002 | DE |
1075698 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1335390 | Aug 2003 | EP |
2004128158 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2003013848 | Feb 2003 | WO |
200506353 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2011009006 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,908, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,908, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,908, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,908, 20 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 28, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/042198, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,908, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,908, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,908, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,908, 17 page. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 7, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,908, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/644,477, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 14, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/644,477, 10 pages. |
Pico/Macom GRB-I and “Pico/Macom GRB-2” single and dual coax cable ground blocks, Stallions Satellite and Antenna—Grounding Products, dated Nov. 9, 2005 and printed Aug. 17, 2011, 3 pgs., located online at: http://web.archive.org/web/20051109024213/http://tvantenna.com/products/installation/grounding.html. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200043635 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61226250 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15644477 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 16544748 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12605908 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 15644477 | US |