Patent Application
20220233944
The present disclosure generally relates to auxetic materials, particularly to a shin guard made of auxetic material and a unit structure thereof.
In materials science and solid mechanics, Poisson's ratio is a measure of the Poisson effect, which is the deformation (expansion or contraction) of material in directions perpendicular to the specific direction of loading. The value of Poisson's ratio is the negative of the ratio of transverse strain to axial strain. Most conventional materials have Poisson's ratio values ranging between 0.0 and 0.5. For soft materials, such as rubber, where the bulk modulus is much higher than the shear modulus, Poisson's ratio is near 0.5.
However, advancements in the field of material science and solid mechanics have brought about various materials that behave differently. For example, auxetics are structures or materials with a negative Poisson's ratio. This means that, when stretched, auxetics are structures or materials that tend to become thicker perpendicular to the applied force. This occurs primarily due to their particular internal structure and how it deforms when the sample is uniaxially loaded. Auxetics can be single molecules, crystals, or a particular structure of macroscopic matter. Such materials and structures are expected to have mechanical properties such as high energy absorption and fracture resistance. Therefore auxetic materials have been found to be useful in applications such as body armor, packing material, knee and elbow pads, robust shock-absorbing material, and sponge mops.
However, there are various disadvantages associated with the hitherto existing structures of auxetic material and various challenges associated with usage of the auxetic material, which sometimes tend to make usage and application of auxetic material suitable.
In view of the preceding disadvantages inherent in the prior art, the present disclosure's general purpose is to provide a unit structure of auxetic materials that includes all advantages of the prior art, and yes overcomes the drawbacks inherent in the prior art.
An object of the present disclosure is to provide a novel unit structure of the auxetic material.
Another object of the present disclosure is to provide a protective article used in sports equipment with a novel unit structure.
Another object of the present disclosure is to provide a shin guard having a novel unit structure of the auxetic material.
To achieve the above objects, in an aspect of the present disclosure, an article made from an auxetic material, the auxetic material having a plurality of unit structures joined together, is provided. The unit structure includes a first strut element, and a second strut element joined to the first strut element. Each of the first strut element and the second strut element has a predetermined thickness and width. The first strut element is connected to the second strut element at a predetermined re-entrant angle (Θ). Further, the first strut element includes a top first strut element, and a bottom first strut element, and the second strut element includes a set of top second strut elements and a set of bottom second strut elements and wherein the strut element of the set of top second strut elements being connected to respective strut member of the set of bottom second strut elements.
This together with the other aspects of the present disclosure, along with the various features of novelty that characterize the present disclosure, is pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forms a part of the present disclosure. For a better understanding of the present disclosure, its operating advantages, and the specified object attained by its uses, reference should be made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which there are illustrated exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.
The advantages and features of the present disclosure will become better understood with reference to the following detailed description and claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like elements are identified with like symbols, and in which:
Like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the description of several views of the drawings.
For a thorough understanding of the present disclosure, reference is to be made to the following detailed description, including the appended claims, in connection with the above-described drawings. Although the present disclosure is described in connection with exemplary embodiments, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the specific forms set forth herein. It is understood that various omissions and substitutions of equivalents are contemplated as circumstances may suggest or render expedient, but these are intended to cover the application or implementation without departing from the spirit or scope of the claims of the present disclosure. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
The terms, “a” and “an” herein do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced items.
The present disclosure provides an article made from an auxetic material, the auxetic material having a plurality of unit structures joined together. The unit structure includes a first strut element, and a second strut element joined to the first strut element. Each of the first strut element and the second strut element has a predetermined thickness and width. The first strut element is connected to the second strut element at a predetermined re-entrant angle (Θ). Further, the first strut element includes a top first strut element, and a bottom first strut element, and the second strut element includes a set of top second strut elements and a set of bottom second strut elements and wherein the strut element of the set of top second strut elements being connected to respective strut member of the set of bottom second strut elements.
Referring now to
The sports equipment (200) as illustrated in any of these figures, is composed of an auxetic material (202). In examples where the sports equipment (200) is composed of multiple parts, as illustrated in
The auxetic material (202) is made up of a plurality of singular unit structures (100) joined together. Each of the unit structures (100) may have an identical profile and may be joined together using various means, to form the auxetic material (202) that can be transformed into the required shape, i.e., the shape of the desired sports equipment, such as a shin guard.
As shown in
As shown in
Further, the set of top second strut elements (104a, 104b) extends downwardly from opposite ends of the top first strut element (102a) at the predetermined re-entrant angle (Θ). In the same but in symmetric opposite manner, the set of bottom second strut elements (104c, 104d) extend upwardly from opposite ends of the bottom first strut element (102b) at the predetermined re-entrant angle (Θ).
In an embodiment, the predetermined re-entrant angle (Θ) ranges between 65 degrees to 70 degrees. For example, the predetermined re-entrant angle (Θ) is 67 degrees.
In an embodiment, both vertical struts (i.e., first strut element (102)) and oblique struts (i.e., second strut element (104)) may have the same square cross-section. For example, both vertical struts (i.e., first strut element (102)) and oblique struts (i.e., second strut element (104)) may have the same square cross-section ‘t.’ In an example, the cross-section of vertical struts, and the oblique struts are about 0.5−/+0.01.
The first strut element (102) has a predetermined length “h”, and the second strut element (104) has a predetermined length “l.” The top first strut element (102a), is separated from the bottom first strut element (102b) by twice of “l” times sin (Θ).
The predetermined length “h” of the first strut element (102) is greater than twice “l” times cos (Θ). The first strut element (102) has a predetermined width “t”, wherein the predetermined width “t” is less than “l” times sin (Θ). The width of the vertical struts (1t), and the width of the oblique struts (1l) (2t).
In an embodiment, the predetermined length h of the first strut element (102) is greater than
As shown in
Various test results prove and establish the performance of the unit structure (100) of the present disclosure.
Compressive Testing Result: The energy absorption of reentrant structures was investigated, and it was concluded that under the same compressive strain, the reentrant structures absorbed more energy due to early densification, as illustrated in
3P Bending Test Result: The three-point bending flexural test provides results for the modulus of elasticity in bending, flexural stress, flexural strain, and the flexural stress-strain response of the material, refer to
The major benefit of a three-point flexural test is the specimen preparation and testing convenience. However, this approach also has some disadvantages: the findings of the testing method are susceptible to specimen and loading geometry and strain rate.
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, a unit structure (100) of an auxetic material (202) is illustrated. The unit structure (100) comprises: a first strut element (102), includes a top first strut element (102a), and a bottom first strut element (102b), a second strut element (104) joined to the first strut element (102), the second strut element (104) includes a set of top second strut elements (104a, 104b) and a set of bottom second strut elements (104c, 104d), and wherein the strut element of the set of top second strut elements (104a, 104b) being connected to respective strut member of the set of bottom second strut elements (104c, 104d) the set of top second strut elements (104a, 104b) extend downwardly from opposite ends of the top first strut element (102a) at the predetermined re-entrant angle (Θ), and wherein the set of bottom second strut elements (104c, 104d) extend upwardly from opposite ends of the bottom first strut element (102b) at the predetermined re-entrant angle (Θ) wherein the predetermined re-entrant angle (Θ) ranges between 65 degrees to 70 degrees.
The first strut element (102) has a predetermined length “h”, and the second strut element (104) has a predetermined length “l”, wherein the top first strut element (102a), is separated from the bottom first strut element (102b) by twice of “l” sin (Θ). The predetermined length h of the first strut element (102) is greater than twice “l” times of cos (Θ).
The first strut element (102) has a predetermined width “t”, wherein the predetermined width “t” is less than “l” times of sin (Θ).
Referring now to
In an embodiment, the plurality of unit structures (100n) comprise a first unit structure (100a), and one or more adjacent unit structures (100b) connected to the first unit structure (100a).
In an embodiment, the top first strut element (102a) of the first unit structure (100a) is the bottom first strut element (102b) of an upper positioned unit structure of the one or more adjacent unit structures (100b). Alternatively, the top first strut element (102a) of the first unit structure (100a) is connected to the bottom first strut element (102b) of the upper positioned unit structure of the one or more adjacent unit structures (100b). Likewise, the bottom first strut element (102b) of the first unit structure (100a) is the top first strut element (102a) of a bottom positioned unit structure of the one or more adjacent unit structures (100b). Alternatively, the bottom first strut element (102b) of the first unit structure (100a) is connected to the top first strut element (102a) of the bottom positioned unit structure of the one or more adjacent unit structures (100b).
Referring now to
In the same manner the application of expanding force on one or more of the top first strut element (102a) and the bottom first strut element (102b) causes expansion between the set of top second strut elements (104a, 104b) and the set of bottom second strut elements (104c, 104d). For example, the application of expanding force, that is force along with axis V, from the top first strut element (102a) away from the bottom first strut element (102b), causes expansion, i.e., movement away from each other whereby the top second strut element (104a) moving away from the top second strut element (104b), and the bottom second strut elements (104c) moving away from the bottom second strut elements (104d).
As such, the deformation along the lateral (vertical) axis owing to Poisson's ratio under tensile axial (horizontal) stress for (a) a forced material and (b) a resultant auxetic material is illustrated.
In an example, the sports equipment (200), having the unit structure (100) of the auxetic material (202), may be manufactured using the 3D Printing technique. In such an example, the sports equipment (200) will be manufactured using the following materials and under the following parameters.
Filament: CarbonX™ CF-PETG
Chemical Name: Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol Copolymer (PETG)
It may herein be noted that an interlocking assembly approach for fabricating 3D auxetic cellular structures of the present disclosure has significant benefits over additive manufacturing.
During utilizing the article i.e., sports equipment made from the auxetic material having the described unit structure, the application of load or forces thereon, will cause the article to significantly absorb energy and expand while exhibiting negative Poisson's Ratio. Accordingly, the disclosed article, or any sports equipment having the disclosed unit structure, will have significant improvements and advantages over conventional materials.
More particularly, these dimensions with auxetic unit structures demonstrated more uniform deflection and bending compliance than other structures. Additionally, it was proved that the features of auxetic sandwich structures might be adjusted to meet the requirements of a particular design application by using alternative cell structure geometries. Additionally, it was discovered that additional three-dimensional cellular sandwich constructions might display great stiffness and strength, which is advantageous for possible applications.
Moreover, the auxetic sandwich panels displayed uniform stress and deformation distribution during bending. Bending experiments have shown that the auxetic sandwich panel mechanical characteristics could be customized across an extensive range by varying the Poisson's ratio. Additionally, the auxetic sandwich panels demonstrated exceptional bending resistance as compared to all other designs. Consequently, auxetic sandwich panels of the present disclosure have a great deal of promise for energy absorption applications in general.
