1. Technical Field
The invention relates to a ship, especially a ship with at least one sail rotor.
2. Description of the Related Art
A sail rotor is a rotating cylinder, which is positioned on a ship and driven by a motor, preferably an electric motor and thereby creates forward thrust in connection with the wind sweeping by. The physics of the sail rotors were already described by the physician Magnus and ships with such sail rotors, also called Magnus rotors existed previously, which were successfully tested in the twenties by Anton Flettner. However, this technology, for example known from DE 420840 and CH 116268, lost its importance due to the introduction of diesel motors.
The present invention deals with the further development of a ship with at least one sail rotor, preferably four sail rotors, and in some cases it is an object of the invention not only to decidedly lower, with the sail rotor technology, the fuel consumption of a ship and thereby also the pollutant emission of the ship per transported ton compared to conventional shipping, but also to enable a safe operation of the ship, especially when the ship is a large freighter with a length of about 130 meters and the ship itself is ocean going.
The ship in accordance with aspects of the invention thereby comes not only with at least one sail rotor, but also with a marine screw (propeller) drive system which is driven by an electric motor. The electric motor can thereby be an electric machine which is also known as a generator of the type E-82 of the company Enercon, for example, is however operated as a motor and thereby also controlled by the power converters which are usually used in wind energy installations.
a is a top view of the forecastle in
b is a cross section view of the forecastle in
c is a cross section view of the forecastle in
d is a cross section view of the forecastle in
e is a cross section view of the locks of the forecastle as locking pins of
f is a cross section view of other locks of a forecastle.
g is a cross section view of the panel 10 of the forecastle in the two different positions.
h is a top view of the upper deck of the ship of
It is an object of the invention to further develop the ship known from WO 2006/133950 A2 so that waves which reach the forecastle are broken so that the ship becomes ocean going.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the forecastle has a panel, which is pivotable relative to horizontal so that when strong seas and therefore strong waves are observed, the panel can be pivoted downward and waves which strike the forecastle can then be broken so that the thereby invading water can drain to the side without penetrating the ship.
The panel, which is pivotable at the forecastle relative to horizontal, has an upper position and a lower position. The lower position is assumed when high seas are observed and a wave breaker function is desired. The upper position is assumed when this is not the case and instead the incoming wind is to be guided as much as possible without turbulence to the upper deck of the ship to then drive the sail rotors as much as possible without swirling and thereby as much as possible without turbulence, in order to provide a maximum Magnus forward thrust or a stabilization by way of the Magnus rotors.
Thus, when the panel is in its upper position, it is used to guide the oncoming wind as optimal as possible to the Magnus rotors.
When the seas are too strong, the panel is pivoted downward in order to allow for the wave breaker function.
The invention is further described in the following by way of one of the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings.
As is apparent from
As is easily seen from
As is apparent from
Because of the soft transitions at the tip of the bow as well as across the forecastle 3, across the bridge 4, the bridge roof as well as the sidewalls of the bridge and the sidewalls of the forecastle, the on flowing wind can reach the sail rotors 5 by way of the forecastle and the bridge and as much as possible without turbulence. It is thereby also noted that the forecastle 3 gradually rises from the tip of the bow 9 to the windows 6 of the bridge 4 so that the air in this region reaches the bridge or the windows and flows around the bridge by way of the bridge roof or along the windows (left or right) so that the air or the wind reaches the sail rotors 5 in order to contribute thereon to the forward thrust increase.
a shows a top view of the forecastle 3. The forecastle 3 has one-approximately triangular panel 10 which ends in its forward region in the region of the tip of the bow 9 and in the rearward region rests against the construction of the bridge 4.
Different locking mechanisms of the panel 10 are also apparent from
b shows a cross-section along line B-B through
It is also illustrated in
c shows mechanisms provided herefor, for pivoting of the panel 10 to the two positions 16, 17, namely essentially hydraulic assemblies for the lifting or lowering of the panel 10, in clear illustration. It is also apparent from
The drive for the lifting and lowering of the panel includes a hydraulic piston or stamp supported in a cylinder, which—after opening of the locks 12 and 11—and when the lever length is shortened, lowers the panel about a joint 30 until it comes to rest on a rest 18 and/or the floor.
When the panel is in the lower position 17, it is there again locked at the side of the panel by locks 11.
d shows a further cross-section through the forecastle, namely along line A-A in
The position of the panel 10 in the upper position 16 or in the alternative, lower position 17 is hereby apparent. Also apparent are the locks 11 at the sides of the panel 10.
It is also apparent from
At the widest location of the panel 10, the sidewalls 19 and 20 are cut through and the opening 8—see FIG. 1—is visible from the outside.
One clearly recognizes that when the panel 10 is in the lower position 17 the water, which breaks over the forecastle at high seas and waves passes the panel 10 and strikes the bridge wall of the under structure 15 and can drain towards the left and right through the openings 8. The draining is thereby also assisted by the construction of the panel 10 which is not completely horizontal but slightly slopes down towards the left and right side as is well recognized from
At the same time, this construction of the panel 10 also has the advantage that the panel 10 when it is in its upper position 16 assists the onward sweep of the wind and thereby the optimal flow around the bridge.
e shows that construction of the locks 12 as locking pins.
g once again shows the construction of the panel 10 in the two different positions “upper position” 16 and “lower position” 17 and
The rest 18 is apparent in the central region of
The locks 11, 12 are opened before the movement of the panel 10 so that the panel 10 can be moved into the respectively desired position 16 or 17.
As mentioned, the normal position of the panel 10 of the forecastle 3 is the one in the upper position 16.
When heavy seas develop, the panel 10 of the forecastle 3 can from the bridge be moved very fast into the lower position 17 so that waves which strike the forecastle cannot at all reach the region of the windows of the bridge, but strike the bridgewall 15 of the ship, are broken and then can drain towards the left and right through the openings 8.
The height of the panel 10 where it abuts in the upper position on the bridgewall 15 is about two meters above the floor, which is also apparent from
During normal seas, the waves are not driven this high over the forecastle and the panel 10 of the forecastle 3 is then held in the upper position 16 in order to thereby optimally assist the ship's advancement and the operation of the sail rotors.
By way of the soft outer contours also of the forecastle—here see especially
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 003 662 | Apr 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/054136 | 3/18/2011 | WO | 00 | 5/7/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/124460 | 10/13/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1674169 | Flettner | Jun 1928 | A |
2141181 | Geddes | Dec 1938 | A |
2151836 | Bugatti | Mar 1939 | A |
2584347 | Hazard | Feb 1952 | A |
2713392 | Von Karman et al. | Jul 1955 | A |
3004510 | Nawara | Oct 1961 | A |
3280777 | Matzer | Oct 1966 | A |
3428194 | Weiss | Feb 1969 | A |
3616776 | Anker-Nilsen | Nov 1971 | A |
3808998 | Molotzak | May 1974 | A |
3934530 | Kossa et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4377123 | Jackson | Mar 1983 | A |
4398895 | Asker | Aug 1983 | A |
4492310 | Weingart | Jan 1985 | A |
4602584 | North et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4760702 | Ammann et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4776294 | Childs | Oct 1988 | A |
4795312 | Purcaru | Jan 1989 | A |
4870558 | Luce | Sep 1989 | A |
5599215 | Järvinen | Feb 1997 | A |
5616056 | Meissner | Apr 1997 | A |
5724906 | Lee | Mar 1998 | A |
6302652 | Roberts | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6352408 | Kilian | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6644926 | Vandyke | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6792886 | Maloney et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6848382 | Bekker | Feb 2005 | B1 |
8070446 | Potter et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8261681 | Wobben | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8601964 | Rohden | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20030118446 | Han et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20070163484 | Eng et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20140137781 | Rohden | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
895.044 | Mar 1983 | BE |
116268 | Aug 1926 | CH |
87 1 00987 | Oct 1987 | CN |
87 2 09395 | Feb 1988 | CN |
420840 | Nov 1925 | DE |
422057 | Nov 1925 | DE |
24 30 630 | Apr 1976 | DE |
3425426 | Jan 1986 | DE |
243 251 | Feb 1987 | DE |
41 01 238 | Jul 1992 | DE |
199 52 460 | May 2001 | DE |
101 02 740 | Aug 2002 | DE |
2 072 112 | Sep 1981 | GB |
2 111 007 | Jun 1983 | GB |
50-155789 | Dec 1975 | JP |
54-102786 | Aug 1979 | JP |
57-18596 | Jan 1982 | JP |
57-33082 | Feb 1982 | JP |
57-55292 | Apr 1982 | JP |
58-4696 | Jan 1983 | JP |
58-87698 | Jun 1983 | JP |
59-140193 | Aug 1984 | JP |
59-206296 | Nov 1984 | JP |
60-38290 | Feb 1985 | JP |
60-75193 | May 1985 | JP |
60-95398 | Jun 1985 | JP |
60-139593 | Jul 1985 | JP |
61-113090 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61-169796 | Oct 1986 | JP |
62-129387 | Aug 1987 | JP |
62-231889 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-98899 | Jun 1988 | JP |
63-195998 | Dec 1988 | JP |
4331694 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-213271 | Aug 1993 | JP |
8-26186 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8-74602 | Mar 1996 | JP |
2000-262082 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-30979 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2003-138836 | May 2003 | JP |
2005-132314 | May 2005 | JP |
10-1993-0004152 | Mar 1993 | KR |
97-010829 | Jul 1997 | KR |
10-2011-0063531 | Jun 2011 | KR |
2 063 362 | Jul 1996 | RU |
2006133950 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2011124460 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Shipbuilding, “Rotosail to enter commercial service on 445 dwt ship,” Schiff & Hafen, No. 7, XP-002079444, Hamburg, Deutschland, Jul. 1985, 2 pages. |
“Hybrid rotors for wind propulsion,” Marine Engineers Review 604:54-55, London, Great Britain, Sep. 1991. |
Beverley, “Electric Propulsion Drives,” Marine Engineering:303-305, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Jersey City, New Jersey, Oct. 1, 1991. |
Wagner, “Die Segelmaschine,” Ernst Kabel Verlag GmbH:154-175, Hamburg, 1991. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 12, 2011 from PCT/EP2011/054136 (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130213286 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |