The present application relates to containers for receiving frangible objects such as eggs, and to structural components of such containers.
Egg containers of various kinds have been developed for the transportation and sale of eggs. As eggs are relatively fragile, the egg containers must protect the eggs from the various manipulations involved from the packaging of the eggs to the consumer's refrigerator. One significant improvement in egg containers is the use of thermoformed plastics as material for the egg containers. Thermoformed plastics are typically transparent, which allows the eggs to be visible, and are relatively inexpensive to produce. Hence, the consumer may inspect the eggs without having to open the container.
The packaging process in which eggs are inserted in egg containers is often automated. In such processes, and in manual packaging processes, eggs are dropped into their receiving cavities. For this reason, the bottom of egg containers are domed, so as to absorb the shock of a dropped egg. However, the domed bottom may cause a bounce of the egg, which may in turn result in eggs of adjacent egg receiving cavities contacting one another during packaging, when bouncing up.
It is therefore an aim of the present disclosure to provide a container for frangible items such as eggs that addresses issues associates with the prior art.
Therefore, in accordance with the present application, there is provided a container for receiving frangible items comprising: a sheet of polymer formed into: a base portion having a plurality of item receiving cavities for supporting frangible items; at least one cover portion having at least one item covering concavity for covering the frangible items; a first hinge between a first longitudinal edge of the base portion and the cover portion for rotating the cover portion onto the base portion to hold the frangible items captive in the item receiving cavities; and a hollow ring projecting upwardly from a bottom surface of at least one of the item receiving cavities to define an annular contact surface for an item received in the item receiving cavity.
Further in accordance with the present application, there is provided a container for receiving frangible items comprising: a sheet of polymer formed into: a base portion having a plurality of item receiving cavities for supporting frangible items, with at least a pair of adjacent ones of the item receiving cavities being separated by a horizontal shoulder; at least one cover portion having at least one item covering concavity for covering the frangible items; a first hinge between a first longitudinal edge of the base portion and the cover portion for rotating the cover portion onto the base portion to hold the frangible items captive in the item receiving cavities; and at least one hollow separator wall projecting upwardly from at least one of the horizontal shoulder separating adjacent ones of the item receiving cavities.
Referring to the drawings and more particularly to
The egg container 10 of
Referring to
In order to close the egg container 10′, the middle cover portion 15 is firstly hinged into contact with the base container 12, as illustrated by arrow A. The top cover portion 13 is then hinged onto the middle cover portion 15, as illustrated by arrow B. When the egg container 10/10′ is closed, peripheral flanges 21 and 22 lay flat one on the other.
Referring to
A shock absorber 30 is provided in a bottom of the cavity 12. The shock absorber 30 may project upwardly from a wall 31 of the cavity 12 having generally planar surfaces. When the containers 10 and 10′ are laid on the ground, the wall 31 typically lies on the ground. The shock absorber 30 is integral with the material of the cavity 12, as the egg containers 10 and 10′ are made of a thermoformed sheet.
In
A ring 33 projects upwardly from a top surface 34 of the base 32. In another embodiment, the ring 33 may project directly from a bottom of the receiving cavity 12 (e.g., from the wall 31). The ring 33 is hollow in that it defines a hollow volume between its inner and outer diameters, as it is the result of the thermoforming process. An outer diameter of the ring 33 is of 0.56″±0.07″ and an inner diameter is of 0.38±0.05″, and a highest point thereof relative to the ground is at 0.12″±0.06″. Accordingly, the combination of the base 32 and ring 33 defines a crater-like shape in the illustrated embodiments of
When an egg is dropped in the cavity 12, it will contact the ring 33, and possibly a part of the top surface 34. The ring 33 is sized so as to temporarily deform (e.g., elastic deformation) or maintain its shape upon contact and hence decelerate the fall of the egg at a suitable rate. The ring 33 may then regain its initial shape, causing some bounce of the egg. However, the geometry of the ring 33 reduces the bounce over some existing bottom configurations, by having a greater stiffness than a dome.
In
Referring to
The egg containers of the present disclosure may contain any suitable number of egg receiving cavities. One suitable material for the egg containers of the present application is polyethylene terephthalate (PET). PET has many advantages, as this material can be transparent or opaque and can be produced at high volume and at low cost. Wall thicknesses of PET cases in a contemplated embodiment are of 0.0175 inch in thickness, but other thicknesses as low as 0.012 to as high as 0.022 inch are also contemplated. It is pointed out that the thickness may be outside of these ranges, especially after the container 10 is formed. However, any suitable thickness can be used, depending on the fragility of the objects packaged in the container 10.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2600130 | Schilling | Jun 1952 | A |
2918204 | Butterfield | Dec 1959 | A |
3123519 | Reifers et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3421682 | Eisenbach | Jan 1969 | A |
3603499 | Snow et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3613987 | Laidman | Oct 1971 | A |
3779370 | Snow et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3790062 | Boyd | Feb 1974 | A |
3813027 | Misdom et al. | May 1974 | A |
4088259 | Sutton | May 1978 | A |
4194682 | Congleton et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4394214 | Bixler et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4448344 | Lord et al. | May 1984 | A |
4553692 | Padovani | Nov 1985 | A |
4795080 | McIntyre | Jan 1989 | A |
5950830 | Trigger | Sep 1999 | A |
6012583 | Ramirez | Jan 2000 | A |
7255231 | Andrews et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20110120898 | Archambault et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110226656 | Archambault et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130183412 | Ramirez | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130212981 | Chait et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140131245 A1 | May 2014 | US |