1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a shock absorber, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to a shock absorber for a sports floor.
2. Brief Description of the Related Art
It is generally known to provide cushioning pads under a sports flooring system in order to provide resiliency to the floor. In such known systems, the amount of cushioning provided by the pads is generally controlled by the durometer, i.e., the hardness of the pads. There are both advantages and disadvantages to using either hard or soft pads.
Specifically, in sports such as basketball and racquetball, it is important that the floor be relatively stiff, so that the ball bounces back easily and uniformly throughout the floor. High durometer (hard) resilient pads produce a floor having preferred ball response characteristics. However, hard pads provide little shock absorption, and have a greater potential to cause injury to the athlete. This problem is especially severe when heavy loading occurs from a number of athletes performing in close proximity to each other.
Low durometer (soft) resilient pads provide greater shock absorption and hence provide a higher level of safety or protection to the athlete. However, floors employing such soft pads do not produce desirable ball response characteristics under normal loading conditions, and thus are not suitable for sports such as basketball and racquetball. Furthermore, soft pads are prone to “compression set” which is a permanent change in profile after the pad has been subjected to high loads for a long period of time. Such compression set can occur in areas where bleachers, basketball standards, or other gymnasium equipment are likely to be placed for periods of time.
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
A plurality of shock absorbers 22 constructed in accordance with the present invention are illustrated supporting the sub-flooring 14 in a spaced apart relation with respect to the base 20. The shock absorbers 22 are connected to the bottom surface of the first layer of plywood 16 at an equal center-to-center distance. For a basketball court, the shock absorbers 22 are generally required to be spaced at 913/16 inch center-to-center intervals, by way of example. For a multi-purpose floor, the shock absorbers 22 would generally be required to be spaced at twelve inch center-to-center intervals to provide additional flex in the playing surface.
Referring now to
The pyramid portion 26 extends centrally from the base portion 24 and preferably has a diameter less than the base portion 24. The pyramid portion 26 is shown to have a truncated upper end 34 and four sides 36, 38, 40, and 42. In a preferred embodiment, each of the sides 36-42 is formed to have a plurality of steps 44a, 44b, 44c, and 44d which generally have a right angle configuration with an upper surface of the steps 44a-44d being substantially perpendicular to a central axis 45 (
The shock absorber 22 is formed into a one piece unit using conventional manufacturing processes, such as vulcanization, and can be formed from a variety of elastomeric materials, such as rubber, PVC, neoprene, nylon, plastisol, or polyurethane. As discussed above, high durometer (hard) resilient shock absorbers produce a floor having preferred ball response characteristics; however, hard shock absorbers provide low shock absorption, and thus have a greater potential to cause harm to the athlete. Yet, floors employing soft shock absorbers do not produce desirable ball response characteristics. Desirable results have been obtained by constructing the shock absorber 22 from a plastisol having a durometer Shore hardness of 65.
The steps 44a-44d of the pyramid portion 26 are dimensioned so that the combination of the base portion 24 and the pyramid portion 26 provides the desired shock absorbing characteristics that cause the floor assembly 10 to absorb a significant percentage of the impact force of an individual's foot while maintaining a firmness which controls the deformation of the playing surface and results in a desirable ball response off the playing surface. It should be understood that the number and thickness of the steps may altered to provide a shock absorber which provides the desired floor characteristics.
The DIN standards were developed to ensure that aerobic athletes received a greater degree of safety and performance from a flooring surface when participating in aerobic exercise. There are four basic testing areas under the DIN standards. These areas are: area deflection, vertical deflection, shock absorption, and ball deflection. Area deflection measures the floor system's ability to contain the deflected area under an athlete's impact, measured within twenty inches of the impacted area. Vertical deflection measures the floor system's downward movement during the impact of an athlete landing on the surface. This measurement is interdependent with area deflection criteria. Shock absorption measures the floor system's ability to absorb impact forces normally absorbed by the athlete when landing on a hard surface such as concrete or asphalt. Finally, ball deflection measures the ball's response off the sports floor system as compared to the ball's response off concrete.
Other standards exist as well. For example, the EN standards have recently been developed. The EN standards focus on three test areas: vertical deflection, shock absorption, and ball deflection.
A test pod incorporating the shock absorber 22 described above were tested by ASET Services, Inc. utilizing the test methods described in the DIN 18032.2 (1991) Standard and EN 14904 (2006). The test pod had the shock absorbers 22 spaced at twelve inches. The results of those tests are as follows:
DIN 18032.2 (1991) Standard Performance Data by Test Point
EN 14904 (2006) Performance Data by Test Point
From the above description it is clear that the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects and to attain the advantages mentioned herein as well as those inherent in the invention. While a presently preferred embodiment of the invention has been described for purposes of this disclosure, it will be understood that numerous changes may be made which will readily suggest themselves to those skilled in the art and which are accomplished within the spirit of the invention disclosed and as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1806341 | Gavaza | May 1931 | A |
1969266 | Herold | Aug 1934 | A |
2225093 | Avery | Dec 1940 | A |
2357120 | Kuebert et al. | Aug 1944 | A |
2458621 | Miller | Jan 1949 | A |
3305227 | Henley | Feb 1967 | A |
3361467 | Ludwikowski | Jan 1968 | A |
3368806 | Szonn | Feb 1968 | A |
4521979 | Blaser | Jun 1985 | A |
4860516 | Koller et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4879857 | Peterson et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4890434 | Niese | Jan 1990 | A |
4945697 | Ott et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5118086 | Stevenson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5277010 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5412917 | Shelton | May 1995 | A |
5549327 | Rusche et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5609000 | Niese | Mar 1997 | A |
5619832 | Myrvold | Apr 1997 | A |
6141931 | Simmons | Nov 2000 | A |
6357717 | Kennard, IV | Mar 2002 | B1 |
RE37615 | Niese | Apr 2002 | E |
6363675 | Shelton | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397543 | Hamar | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6457261 | Crary | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6742312 | Valentine | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20020063369 | Huang | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090211192 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |