The present invention relates to a shock absorbing device for a cable under tension, in particular for rockfall and avalanche control works, according to the preamble of claim 1.
A device of this type is disclosed in EP-B-0 494 046. The cable is looped through a helical deformation element in the form of a tube and the overlapping tube ends are guided through a clamping element, while the tube is plastically deformed when the cable is overloaded, as the helical diameter is reduced. The clamping element is in the form of a compression sleeve. A frictional engagement arises between the tube and the clamping element which can only be overcome after an initial tension force has been exceeded. The damping curve rises in approximately linear fashion over the area of the cable extension, as the result of which a progressive absorption of the kinetic energy, for example from a rockfall, occurs.
The present invention is based on the problem of making a decisive further improvement to the device of the first-mentioned type with respect to the load-damping curve.
This problem is solved according to the invention by a device with the features of claim 1.
Further preferred embodiments of the device according to the invention form the subject matter of the dependent claims.
Since according to the invention the holding element has bevels, roundings and soft inlays or special surface coatings at the entry and exit of an opening formed for the overlapping ends of the deformation element, the plastic deformation of the deformation element which occurs when the cable is overloaded, as the helical diameter reduces, can progress more consistently than before, and also the load-damping curve is better defined, while the effect (damping) sets in more rapidly, i.e. greater resistance is generated right from the start, which catches any shock loading, for example due to large falling rocks.
The damping curve can be largely predetermined, not only by the dimensioning of the helical deformation element, but also by the choice of material and geometrical design of the holding element. The holding element can advantageously include a bearing shell enclosed by a compression sleeve as a transition piece, where the compression sleeve can preferably be made of aluminum and the bearing shell with bevels or roundings can be made of corrosion-resistant steel or of steel with a corrosion-resistant layer or coating. For technical production reasons, it is also advantageous to have a two-part holding element according to the invention made from corrosion-resistant steel.
The invention will next be explained in more detail with the aid of the drawings, which show:
When the cable 9 is overloaded, for example by falling masses of stones or snow, the helical diameter is reduced, while the deformation element 1 is pulled through the holding element 10, at least on one side. Due to this plastic deformation of the deformation element 1 and due to the friction between the deformation element 1 and the holding element 10, any high-impact load acting on the cable 9 is damped and kinetic energy is progressively reduced as the extension of the cable increases, in which case the cable strength can be exploited to the full. With relatively long cables, several such helixes can be distributed over the cable length. Several helixes can also be guided through the holding element.
In the embodiment shown in
As can be seen from
According to the invention, the holding element 10 has bevels or roundings on the entry and exit of the opening formed for the overlapping end sections 2, 3 of the deformation element 1, which promote the deformation process associated with the change in the helical diameter, so that this can occur more consistently and with better definition.
Another embodiment of an advantageous holding element 30 is shown in
In an especially advantageous fashion, both clamping elements 33, 34 of the holding element 30 are identical in structure, in which case the one side part 37 includes a projection 50 oriented transversely to the opening axis and the other side part 37 is in the form of a fork and is provided with a groove 51 oriented transversely to the opening axis. The two clamping parts 33, 34—reciprocally rotated through 180°—can be brought together in such a way that the one clamping part 33 projects with the projection 50 into the groove 51 of the other clamping element 33 and its groove 51 accepts the projection 50 of the other clamping element 34. The clamping parts 33, 34 interlocking with each other in this way are joined via a compression bolt 55 guided through the fork-shaped side parts and the projections 50 inserted therein, and hence the end sections 2, 3 are locked.
Advantageously both the projection 50 and the grooves 51 are wedge-shaped in cross section.
The clamping elements 33, 34 are preferably made of corrosion-resistant steel or of steel with a corrosion-resistant layer or coating.
After joining, the clamping parts 33, 34 act so as to be “self-locking”, since the deformation element applies the necessary counterpressure.
Instead of a tube, an elongate deformation element which is not completely closed around its circumference could also be used to receive the cable. In particular, deformation elements with U and L profiles or similar profiles could be used for this.
In the inventive devices, the load-damping curve can be pre-defined, not only, as previously, by the dimensioning of the helically shaped deformation element and in any event by the generation of a frictional engagement between the deformation element and the holding element, but it can also be defined more clearly by the geometric design of the holding element and the selection of material.
In original condition, this holding element can enclose this deformation element with little play or else clamp or compress the deformation element by acting as a clamping element.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0987/06 | Jun 2006 | CH | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4095328 | Cawthorne | Jun 1978 | A |
4612680 | Daiguji | Sep 1986 | A |
5207302 | Popp et al. | May 1993 | A |
5794897 | Jobin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6079673 | Cox | Jun 2000 | A |
6131873 | Blazon et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6386526 | Sarkar et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080006757 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |