This application is a national stage completion of PCT/GB2009/002413 filed on Oct. 9, 2009 which claims priority from British Application Serial No. 0818508.4 filed on Oct. 9, 2008.
This invention relates to packaging and is concerned particularly with packaging for use in protecting articles against damage and shock during storage and transit.
Various packaging methods have been used for protecting, for example electronic components, during storage and transit. These methods, in addition to being generally labor-intensive, commonly involve a substantial outlay in cost and material-resources on packaging items in the form, for example, of cardboard cases and specially-designed items of plastics foam and corrugated cardboard to fit within them.
A form of packaging case that may be used with advantage environmentally and economically is described in GB-A-2414728. The rectangular packaging case described is of a thermoformed plastics-sheet construction having four walls that are hinged together to fold from flat in erection of the case round the article or articles to be protected. Although this form of packaging case has been found to be very effective in providing shock protection, some articles such as flat-screen television sets and other heavy domestic electronic products, computer monitors and computers themselves, are in general too large to be accommodated in cases of this form. The present invention is concerned with providing an alternative form of packaging that may be used in these circumstances.
According to the present invention, there is provided a one-piece thermoformed packaging device for article shock-protection, wherein the device comprises a plurality of elongate wings which are hinged together and which each have upstanding flanges that are spaced apart laterally of the respective wing to define an intervening channel for receiving a portion of the article to be protected from shock.
A portion of each wing may abut a portion of another of the wings when the device is folded about the hinge by which those two wings are hinged together. Ridges with intervening grooves may run longitudinally of the two wings within the mutually-abutting portions for ridge-within-groove nesting between them. The said portions may be inclined portions of the flanges, and may form a mitre joint, for example of 90 degrees, when in mutual abutment.
Examples of thermoformed packaging devices in accordance with the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
Referring now also to
Three circular recesses 11 are located between the shoulders 7 and 8 of each wing 2 and 3. Each recess 11 is of tiered form in that its diameter decreases progressively in steps with depth to create resilient projections 12 on the outside of the molding (see
As shown most clearly in
More particularly in the latter regard, the ridges and intervening grooves of each ridge-groove pattern 5 and 6 of the wing 3 are shifted laterally by one-half pitch with respect to the corresponding pattern 5 and 6 of the wing 2. As a result the abutment throughout the portions 9 of the wings 2 and 3 is with ridge-within-groove nesting of shoulder 7 with shoulder 7 and shoulder 8 with shoulder 8. This provides interlocking of the two wings 2 and 3 against relative lateral displacement and also cushioning and absorption of shock tending to close up the wings 2 and 3 further onto one another.
Each corner cap 1 fits to the periphery of the article A as illustrated in
Caps of the same general form (including with ridge-groove patterns corresponding to the patterns 5 and 6 in miter-joints) of the cap 1 can be utilized for protection other than in the context of corners. In this respect, reference is directed to
As an extension of this, a wrap for article-protection within, for example, a lightweight cardboard or other container, can be produced as illustrated in
Each of the wings 31 to 34 is molded with a configuration similar to that of each of the wings 2 and 3 of the corner caps 1 described above, but of increased length related to the breadth and height of the monitor C. The wings 31 to 34 have inclined faces at both ends so that mitered joints between them together with ridge-within-groove nesting, are established at the corners of the monitor C as the wings 31, 33 and 34 are folded up round it.
Retention of the wings 31 to 34 wrapped round the perimeter of the monitor C is by a locking tab 35 which is hinged to the free end of wing 34 and which involves a stud 36 that is entered and retained resiliently within a cavity (not shown) in the wing 31.
Where the article to be protected is very large it is often not feasible to design and manufacture a wrap capable of extending throughout the full perimeter. In these circumstances a complete peripheral wrap may be produced by assembly together end-to-end of a plurality of thermoformed wrap-components that each comprise two or more hinged wings. An example of a component 40 of this nature that is made up of just two mutually-hinged wings 41 and 42 with a locking tab 43 hinged to the wing 42, is illustrated in
The three-stage locking sequence is illustrated in
Referring to stage (a) of
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0818508.4 | Oct 2008 | GB | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/GB2009/002413 | 10/9/2009 | WO | 00 | 6/2/2011 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2010/041023 | 4/15/2010 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2863595 | Emery | Dec 1958 | A |
| 3684636 | Rothrock, Jr. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3807622 | Belcher et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3868054 | Congleton | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3939978 | Thomaswick | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3992810 | Kimball | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3994433 | Jenkins et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4162729 | Kaiser et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4869369 | Turngren | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4883179 | Dionne | Nov 1989 | A |
| 5577614 | Palmeroni et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5729960 | Davis | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5806683 | Gale | Sep 1998 | A |
| 6082543 | Beliveau | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6142304 | Moren et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6436217 | Heertjes | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6968954 | Hsieh | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7134553 | Stephens | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7743922 | Pitt | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 20080067105 | Pitt | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20090230016 | Rohrbach et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20110233099 | Pitt | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1777171 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| 2414728 | Dec 2005 | GB |
| 2005118423 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110220541 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |