This application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 National Stage Application of PCT/CN2013/083141, filed on Sep. 9, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The invention relates to a shock sensor for detecting an attack on a facility equipped with the shock sensor.
With the development of the society and technical advancement, more and more convenient facilities, such as automobiles, motorcycles, automatic teller machines (ATM) and the like, appear in our daily life. These facilities normally need to be equipped with alarm devices against an attack, and when the facilities are subjected to the attack, the alarm devices can sense the attack and generate corresponding alarms, such as sound alarms.
At present, the alarm device normally is a shock sensor. That is, it is determined whether the facilities are subjected to the attack according to a shock signal sensed by the shock sensor. To this end, the known shock sensor is provided with a sensing device for sensing the shock signal. In the prior art, a piezo bimorph is usually used as the sensing device. The shock signal sensed by the pizeo bimorph is transmitted to a processor and is analyzed by the processor.
As is well known, the piezo bimorph is an analog element and can only sense a shock in one direction. In operation, the piezo bimorph transforms a strain thereof into an analog voltage as an output signal. Therefore, the shock signal sensed actually by the piezo bimorph may not be a real shock signal and can not describe really the attack as the real shock signal generated by the attack usually has three dimensional components. Moreover, the output signal is interfered easily by many factors, such as noise, a power supply for powering the piezo bimorph, etc.
The shock sensor also needs a complicated analog electrical circuit due to the piezo bimorph, thereby causing the shock sensor unstable.
The known shock sensor mainly executes a detection method as follows. A threshold value is predetermined, the shock signal detected by the shock sensor is compared with the threshold value, and exceeding of the threshold value indicates that the facility is subjected to the attack, thus generating a corresponding alarm. In some cases, in addition that the shock signal detected by the shock sensor is compared with a threshold value, one or more judgment conditions need to be met, in order to further decrease false alarm and missing alarm. However, as described above, the shock signal sensed by the piezo bimorph may not describe really the real attack, and therefore the false alarm and missing alarm may increase so as to cause the shock sensor ineffective.
Thus, it is desirable to provide a simple and reliable shock sensor adapted to detect the shock signal describing really the attack and thereby generate the alarm properly according to the shock signal.
In view of the problems existed in the prior art, an object of the invention is to provide a more simple and reliable shock sensor for detecting an attack on a facility equipped with the shock sensor.
For achieving this object, in one aspect, the present invention provides a shock sensor for detecting an attack on a facility equipped with the shock sensor, which comprises:
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the shock sensor further comprises a sensitivity adjusting device connected with the microprocessor, and a sensitivity of the shock sensor can be adjusted by means of the sensitivity adjusting device.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the microchip is provided with a serial peripheral interface, and the microprocessor is provided with a corresponding serial peripheral interface connected with the serial peripheral interface of the microchip; or the microchip is in communication with the microprocessor in a wireless manner.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the shock sensing device is an acceleration sensing device; and/or the shock sensing device samples the shock signal at a sampling frequency of about 2 kHz, preferably 2 kHz; and/or the output device is an alarm device.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the microchip is programmable and comprises a first register for storing the at least one parameter received from the microprocessor, a second register for storing the shock signal received from the shock sensing device, a memory for storing a program sequence to analyze the shock signal, and an on-chip interrupt controller at least adapted to send an interrupt instruction to the microprocessor based on the analysis result of the shock signal.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the shock sensor further comprises a mode setting device connected with the microprocessor, and the shock sensor can be set to a sensitivity determining mode by means of the mode setting device; and the sensitivity of the shock sensor is determined by means of the following steps: a) setting the shock sensor to the sensitivity determining mode by means of the mode setting device and powering the shock sensor on; b) simulating a desired attack in a predetermined time period and recording an amplitude of the shock signal generated by the desired attack in the predetermined time period by means of the micro electromechanical system; and c) determining the sensitivity of the shock sensor at least based on the amplitude of the shock signal.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, when the sensitivity of the shock sensor is determined, the shock sensor is switched from the sensitivity determining mode to another mode in which the determined sensitivity is allowed to be set by means of the sensitivity adjusting device.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the sensitivity adjusting device comprises a first DIP (double in-line package) switch adapted to select a sensitivity range for the shock sensor and a potentiometer (POT) adapted to set the sensitivity of the shock sensor in the selected sensitivity range; and/or the mode setting device comprises a second DIP switch.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the shock sensor further comprises: an additional adjusting device, in particular a third DIP switch, connected with the microprocessor, wherein a corresponding additional parameter can be set by means of the additional adjusting device, and the corresponding additional parameter is taken into account when the shock signal is analyzed; and/or a tamper switch for protecting the shock sensor itself and connected with the output device.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the shock sensor further comprises an indication device, in particular an LED (light emitting diode), connected with the microprocessor; the output device comprises an optical alarm device and an acoustic alarm device; and the indication device can be used for assisting in setting the sensitivity of the shock sensor and functions as the optical alarm device.
The invention and advantages thereof will be further understood by reading the following detailed description of some preferred exemplary embodiments with reference to the drawings in which:
Now, a shock sensor according to a preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to
As shown in
As further shown in
As an example, the power supply 5 may be a 3 VDC power supply.
Preferably, as shown in
Preferably, as shown
For example, the shock sensing device 8 samples the shock signal at a sampling frequency of 2 kHz.
Preferably, the microchip 9 is programmable and a first preprogrammed program sequence is stored in the microchip 9 to analyze the shock signal. Further, the microchip 9 at least comprises a digital interface (such as the SPI 7), a first register for storing the at least one parameter transmitted from the microprocessor 3, a second register for storing the shock signal received from the shock sensing device 8, a memory for storing the first program sequence, and an on-chip interrupt controller at least adapted to send an interrupt instruction to the microprocessor 3 according to an analysis result of the shock signal.
As an alternative, the MEMS 2 can be communicated with the microprocessor 3 in a wireless manner. In this case, the microchip 9 is provided with a wireless transceiver and the microprocessor 3 is provided with a corresponding wireless transceiver.
Preferably, the shock sensing device 8 is an acceleration sensing device. It should be understood by a person skilled in the art that the shock sensing device 8 may be any other suitable sensing device, as long as the shock signal sensed by the shock sensing device 8 is able to describe really the attack.
Preferably, the interrupt instruction is an instruction for indicating that the attack is determined as the real attack by analyzing the shock signal, and the instruction is sent immediately to the microprocessor 3 when the real attack is determined.
Preferably, a second preprogrammed program sequence is stored in a memory of the microprocessor 3 to at least control the alarm device 4 according to the interrupt instruction received from the on-chip interrupt controller of the MEMS 2. When the microprocessor 3 receives the interrupt instruction, the microprocessor 3 sends a control signal to the alarm device 4 to generate the alarm.
It may be understood by a person skilled in the art that a sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 usually needs to be adjusted when the shock sensor 1 is used in different applications and sites. Generally, as described above, the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 corresponds to a certain threshold value, with which an amplitude of the shock signal will be compared in operation. As an example, by comparing the amplitude of the shock signal generated by the attack with the threshold value (and additionally comparing a duration of the attack with a predetermined duration), the microchip 9 analyzes the shock signal and generates the alarm when the attack is determined as the real attack.
To this end, as shown in
As shown in
It is preferable to provide four different sensitivity levels for the shock sensor 1. In this case, the at least one first DIP switch 11 comprises two DIP switches 11, as shown in
When the microprocessor 3 determines the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1, the threshold value corresponding to the determined sensitivity, as a parameter, is assigned to the first register of the microchip 9 by means of the microprocessor 3. Then, the microchip 9 can be used for analyzing the shock signal at least based on the determined sensitivity by using the first program sequence.
Preferably, as shown in
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the indication device 13 may be or comprises an LED, in particular a colored LED.
For assisting in adjusting the sensitivity, as shown in
Preferably, the mode setting device 14 is a second DIP switch, as shown in
In the normal working mode, the shock sensor 1 works normally to detect the attack. Preferably, when the shock sensor 1 is installed on the facility and set to the normal working mode by means of the mode setting device 14, the shock sensor 1 can be communicated with a control system (not shown) of the facility.
Preferably, in the sensitivity determining mode, the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 can be determined intelligently as follows. Specifically, a process for determining the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 comprises the following steps:
a) setting the shock sensor 1 to the sensitivity determining mode by means of the mode setting device 14 and powering the shock sensor 1 on;
b) simulating a desired attack in a predetermined time period and recording an amplitude of the shock signal generated by the desired attack in the predetermined time period by means of the MEMS 2; and
c) determining the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 at least based on the amplitude of the shock signal.
Preferably, the process for determining the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 is carried out in the microchip 9. Of course, the process can also be carried out in the microprocessor 3.
Once the sensitivity is determined, the shock sensor 1 is set to not be in the sensitivity determining mode and the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 is finally adjusted to the determined sensitivity by means of the sensitivity adjusting device 10 with the help of the indication device 13.
In operation, in addition to the comparison between the amplitude of the shock signal and the threshold value, an additional characteristic value of the shock signal needs to be compared with the corresponding additional threshold value to further decrease false alarm and missing alarm. To this end, the shock sensor 1 further comprises an additional setting device connected with the microprocessor 3 and adapted to set the corresponding additional threshold value. Preferably, the additional setting device is used for selecting one additional threshold from a plurality of predetermined values. In this case, the additional setting device preferably is a third DIP switch 15, as shown in
As further shown in
Preferably, the shock sensor 1 further comprises a tamper switch for self protection. The tamper switch is connected with the alarm device 4 and generates an alarm when the shock sensor 1 is subjected to damage.
While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The attached claims and their equivalents are intended to cover all the modifications, substitutions and changes as would fall within the scope and spirit of the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2013/083141 | 9/9/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/032094 | 3/12/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2968939 | Preston, Jr. | Jan 1961 | A |
3549264 | Christie | Dec 1970 | A |
4845464 | Drori | Jul 1989 | A |
5181010 | Chick | Jan 1993 | A |
5243322 | Thompson | Sep 1993 | A |
5512874 | Poston | Apr 1996 | A |
5805056 | Mueller | Sep 1998 | A |
7356429 | Eskildsen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020021231 | Schlager | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20050190059 | Wehrenberg | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080210020 | Bieck | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090073803 | Smith | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100194692 | Orr | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110037588 | Zeng | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120029765 | Sheffer | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130162365 | Otaguro | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140062692 | Li | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140263426 | Gasper | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2898835 | May 2007 | CN |
101065787 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101634659 | Jan 2010 | CN |
44 20 431 | Dec 1995 | DE |
1 612 565 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2515282 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2512577 | Oct 2014 | GB |
Entry |
---|
ElectronicsTutorials, “Potentiometers”: pp. 1-13 (retrieved on Feb. 2020 from https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/resistor/potentiometer.html) (Year: 2020). |
RS Components Ltd, “What is a DIP switch?”: pp. 1-4 (retrieved on Feb. 2020 from https://uk.rs-online.com/web/generalDisplay.html?id=ideas-and-advice/dip-switches-guide) (Year: 2020). |
International Search Report corresponding to PCT Application No. PCT/CN2013/083141, dated Jun. 10, 2014 (German and English language document) (4 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160223581 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |