Patent Grant
9534870
In order to reduce harm to persons and property, it is desirable to mitigate high intensity impulses such as from blasts and projectiles. These impulses can arise from IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices), mines, and the like.
An armor system includes an appliqué comprising a high fluid retaining material (HFRM) and a plate configured to hold the appliqué against a compartment, wherein the armor system is adapted so that upon impact of a blast wave upon the plate, the HFRM is vented away from the compartment.
In another embodiment, an armor system includes a plate operably connected to a plunger, one or more rods of brittle material operably connected to the plunger and contained within a tube, and a high fluid retaining material (HFRM) also contained within the tube, wherein the armor system is adapted so that upon impact of a blast shock wave upon the plate, the plate transfers the blast shock wave to the plunger and thence to the contents of the tube.
In yet another embodiment, an armor system includes a plate operably connected to a plunger, one or more rods of brittle material operably connected to the plunger and contained within a tube, wherein the armor system is adapted so that upon impact of a blast shock wave upon the plate, the plate transfers the blast shock wave to the plunger and thence to the contents of the tube. Optionally, the tube also contains HFRM.
Definitions
Before describing the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that the terminology used in the specification is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments, and is not necessarily intended to be limiting. Although many methods, structures and materials similar, modified, or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice of the present invention without undue experimentation, the preferred methods, structures and materials are described herein. In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an,” and “the” do not preclude plural referents, unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
As used herein, the term “about” when used in conjunction with a stated numerical value or range denotes somewhat more or somewhat less than the stated value or range, to within a range of ±10% of that stated.
As used herein, the term “high fluid retaining material” or “HFRM” refers to a material that is able to absorb from 50% to up to 1000% of its weight in water.
Description
Mitigation of high intensity impulses from blasts caused by improvised explosive devices (IEDs) or land mines is critical to prevent injury to warfighters and non-combatants. For blast mitigation, it can be shown from first principle momentum and energy conservation arguments that the minimum momentum and kinetic energy transfer occurs for a maximum inelastic collision. To accomplish this requires a structure that both maximizes energy dissipation and provides ideal coupling.
As described herein and in a related application entitled “Materials and Processes for Coupling Impulses and Shockwaves into Solids,” appliqués are developed to better match the impedance of the shock wave and blast products while allowing for energy dissipation. In one embodiment, the two functions (dissipation and coupling) are provided into two separate appliqués, however, it is possible to integrate the two functions into a single appliqué.
Jump height provides relevant and reliable data associated with blast testing of the device under test (DUT). An exemplary jump height test configuration is shows in
Armor System Design
One example of impulse mitigation involves a brittle material, such as glass, fracturing, adsorbing energy from the impulse, and preventing the impulse energy from harming personnel and equipment (see U.S. Pat. No. 8,176,831 and US Patent Publication Nos. 2011/0203452, each of which is incorporated herein by reference).
High fluid retaining materials (HFRM) such as sodium polyacrylate (NAPA) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) are able to absorb 50% to 800% or in some cases up to 1000% their weight in water, depending on process conditions and environmental factors. Normally, bulk water and other fluids that are shear thickening can be utilized to amplify, rather than mitigate a blast wave, due to several factors including water coherently vaporizing at its interface upon passage of a blast wave through its bulk and pressure dependent hydrogen bonding. Thus, it is undesirable to use a contiguous gel or fluid in the armor system.
However, a HFRM made of small distributed volumes such as spheres or fibers adjacent to voids (air) would react to a blast wave in a non-coherent manner, i.e., vaporization of retained fluid would occur at different rates throughout the distributed system and counter act the blast pressure wave rather than reinforce it. This distributed system would have a surface area per unit volume orders of magnitude greater than a bulk fluid structure, enabling a significantly greater aggregate transformation rate of the fluid to its vapor phase, and as a result, absorb a significant portion of the blast wave energy. In addition, these materials are also shear thinning, that is the viscosity decreases with increased stress allowing the momentum and energy of the shockwave to be transferred the medium. Further, materials such as water vapor, experiencing blast wave pressures and temperatures can undergo transformation to a supercritical fluid state, lowering their viscosity and resistance to flow significantly.
Beads or pellets of HRFM material are commercially available in a wide variety of sizes. In one embodiment, beads exist in a dry form with the majority having sizes between 150 μm and 500 μm, swelling with water to about 3 mm. Larger pellets may be used, such as those of about 2 cm. Preferably, the HRFM is fully hydrated or nearly fully hydrated (e.g., about 99.9%, 99%, 98%, 95%, or 90% hydrated).
In a soil blast test, jump height was reduced from 182 inches in a control to 134 inches when using NAPA, a reduction of 25%.
Additionally, the distributed HFRM can be used to redirect the blast wave momentum away from a volume designated for personnel, such as the volume of a troop transport vehicle; the mine resistant ambush protected (MRAP) vehicle. In non-dissipative systems momentum is constrained to be conserved. Thus, the momentum of the initial blast wave must be conserved as that momentum is transferred to the vehicle. The vaporized fluid from the HFRM significantly lowers the HRFM's viscosity allowing it to flow in rapid response to pressure gradient components of the blast wave, and if the armor structure is design appropriately, redirect the momentum and energy of the blast wave away from the vehicle compartment as shown in
Such an embodiment shown is illustrated in
In blast testing of an embodiment as shown in
Incorporating One or More Brittle Rods
In addition to one or more of the armor elements described therein, it is possible to include a vertical tube contains a plunger, one or more brittle rods (comprising glass, ceramic, or a mixture thereof) designed to adsorb energy through a number of processes including fracture, and a high fluid retaining material (HFRM) such as sodium polyacrylate (NAPA) material surrounding the brittle rods.
Such embodiments are shown in
The basin-like structure with the 45° angled sides serves as a representation of the vehicle underbody. There is a large plate under the vehicle body that may contain HFRM material. This plate is preferably comprised of a metal, metal alloy, metal matrix composite, and the like that functions to contain energy absorbing material such as HFRM. It may or may not be shaped to conform to the vehicle underbody shape; in this case the plate does not conform to the vehicle 45° angled sidewall. Atop the large plate is a smaller plate. This plate is comprised of a metal, metal alloy, metal matrix composite, and the like that functions to have appropriate structural integrity to transfer the blast shock wave to the plunger. Atop the small plate is a plunger. The plunger is comprised of a metal, metal alloy, metal matrix composite, and the like that functions to have appropriate structural integrity to transfer the blast shock wave to the brittle material. Atop the plunger is brittle material designed to absorb the blast energy through several mechanisms including fracture and transfer blast energy through acceleration of the fractured brittle material. The HFRM serves to (1) absorb blast energy through a phase transformation, and (2) absorb blast energy through HFRM particle acceleration.
Additional Test Results
Additional blast testing was conducting using various configurations as shown in
For Shot 31, the target configuration (top to bottom) was as follows and is illustrated in
For Shot 31, the target configuration (top to bottom) was as follows and is illustrated in
Target Configuration (from top to bottom):
For Shot 43, the target configuration (top to bottom) was as follows and is illustrated in
All documents mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference for the purpose of disclosing and describing the particular materials and methodologies for which the document was cited.
Although the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions, modifications, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Terminology used herein should not be construed as being “means-plus-function” language unless the term “means” is expressly used in association therewith.
This Application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/662,075 and 61/777,511 filed on Jun. 20, 2012 and Mar. 12, 2013, respectively, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4449446 | Degnan et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 5102723 | Pepin | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5225622 | Gettle et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5394786 | Gettle et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 7437987 | Ohnstad et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7841268 | Bailey | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 8316752 | Waddell et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8522664 | Chen et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8573571 | Langhorst et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8590437 | Gettle | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8820493 | Parida et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 20040118271 | Puckett et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154463 | Edberg et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20080190276 | Barger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250916 | Bailey | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20100307329 | Kaswen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110174144 | Kuchinsky et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20120216670 | McDonald et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20140007761 | Haidar | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140150636 | Baron, Sr. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140208928 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61662075 | Jun 2012 | US | |
| 61777511 | Mar 2013 | US |
